- Open Access
Roles of the highly conserved amino acids in the second receptor binding site of the Newcastle disease virus HN protein
Virology Journal volume 16, Article number: 164 (2019)
The paramyxovirus haemagglutinin-neuraminidase (HN) is a multifunctional protein that is responsible for attachment to receptors, removal of receptors from infected cells to prevent viral self-aggregation (neuraminidase, NA) and fusion promotion. It is commonly accepted that there are two receptor binding sites in the globular head of HN, and the second receptor binding site is only involved in the function of receptor binding and fusion promotion.
10 conserved residues in the second receptor binding site of Newcastle disease virus (NDV) HN were chosen and substituted to alanine (A). The desired mutants were examined to detect the functional change in hemadsorption (HAD) ability, NA activity and fusion promotion ability.
The HAD and fusion promotion ability of mutants C172A, R174A, C196A, D198A, Y526A and E547A were abolished. Compared with wild-type (wt) HN, the HAD of mutants T167A, S202A and R516A decreased to 55.81, 44.53, 69.02%, respectively, and the fusion promotion ability of these three mutants decreased to 54.74, 49.46, 65.26%, respectively; however, mutant G171A still maintained fusion promotion ability comparable with wt HN but had impaired HAD ability. All the site-directed mutations altered the NA activity of NDV HN without affecting protein cell surface expression.
The data suggest that mutants C172A, R174A, C196A, D198A, Y526A and E547A do not allow the conformational change that is required for fusion promotion ability and HAD activity, while the other mutants only affect the conformational change to a limited extent, except mutant G171A with intact fusion promotion ability. Overall, the conserved amino acids in the second receptor binding site, especially residues C172, R174, C196, D198, Y526 and E547, are crucial to normal NDV HN protein function.
The Paramyxoviridae family includes many pathogenic viruses covering both medical and veterinary areas, such as human parainfluenza viruses (hPIVs), Nipah virus (NiV), Sendai virus (SV), mumps virus (MuV) and Newcastle disease virus (NDV) [1,2,3,4,5]. NDV is usually used as an ideal model to study the pathogenic mechanism of paramyxoviruses. NDV, also named avian paramyxovirus type 1 (APMV-1), is an enveloped, non-segmented, single-stranded, negative-sense RNA virus whose genome encodes the nucleocapsid (NP) protein, phosphoprotein (P), matrix (M) protein, fusion (F) protein, haemagglutinin-neuraminidase (HN) protein and polymerase protein (L) in proper order.
To process infection, the lipid envelope of NDV must fuse with the membrane of the host cell and cause the formation of syncytia. The phenomenon of membrane fusion is a receptor-dependent, pH-independent process that requires the cooperation of two glycoproteins embedded in the lipid membrane, F and HN proteins . Regarding the mechanism of how HN cooperates with F, there are some different opinions: first, the protein-protein interactions exist before receptor binding ; second, only after receptor engagement can the protein-protein interactions occur ; third, some researchers have noted that the receptor binding protein is necessary for not only the initial triggering of the F protein but also the entire fusion procedure . Regardless of the mechanism, it is undeniable that the HN protein plays an important role in activating the F protein to achieve membrane fusion.
The NDV HN protein, a multifunctional protein, is a type II glycoprotein existing in the form of tetramers that possesses the following three activities: recognizes and binds sialic acid-containing receptors; acts as a neuraminidase (sialidase) for virus budding; and promotes the fusion activity of the F protein . HN protein can be structurally divided into the cytoplasmic tail domain, transmembrane domain, stalk domain and globular head domain. The core structure of the globular head domain is a so-called β-propeller functioning in receptor binding activity and neuraminidase activity . The opinions of the previous researchers are different in regard to whether the two functions are supported by one site or not. In 1987, researchers argued that the two activities occur at separate sites . However, some studies showed a single site with dual functions [13, 14]. In 2004, clear evidence indicated a second sialic acid binding site at the dimer interface of HN. In a previous study, researchers mentioned that the movement of the residues R174, Y526 and E547 of HN protein caused by HN binding to sialic acid-containing receptors could lead to changes in the HN dimer interface, subsequently creating a new sialic acid binding site composed of four loops: residues 156 to 174, residues 191 to 203, residues 515 to 527 and residues 547 to 556 . For the ability of the second receptor binding site, a study proposed that despite the more avid receptor engagement, the second binding site lacked neuraminidase activity . However, some studies of site mutation involved in the second binding site gave different results. For example, the mutation of F553 to A caused a 70% decrease in receptor binding ability and neuraminidase activity compared with wild-type (wt) HN .
In this study, we tried to determine the real function of the second receptor binding site. Therefore, 18 mutants were constructed and subjected to a series of experiments to probe the functional change of HN after being mutated. Our data demonstrate that the receptor binding site of NDV HN is responsible for HAD ability, NA activity and fusion promotion ability and that some residues play a significant role in guaranteeing the correct function of NDN HN.
Materials and methods
To determine the location of the desired amino acids in this study, the homology model of the NDV HN protein was built with PyMOL 2.0 on the basis of the crystal structure of NDV HN (PDB ID: 1USR).
Cells, viruses and vectors
BHK-21 cells were cultured in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) (Biological Industries (BI), Israel) supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum (FCS) (BI) and 1% penicillin–streptomycin (BI). Both wt vaccinia virus and recombinant vaccinia virus vTF7–3, which can provide T7 RNA polymerase, were presented as a gift from Dr. Bernard Moss of National Institutes of Health. With the exception of the reporter gene method, all cells in this study were transfected with the recombinant vaccinia virus vTF7–3 1 h before transfection with the desired plasmids. The genes NDV HN and F, which were inserted into plasmid pBluescript(+) (pBSK+) containing T7 promoter and terminator respectively, were kindly given by Professor Ronald M. Iorio of University of Massachusetts Medical School and conserved in our laboratory.
Acquisition of mutants
By aligning the HN amino acid sequences of NDV, hPIV1–4, (parainfluenza virus 5) PIV5 and SV, 10 amino acids were chosen (Fig. 1a) and designed to be mutated into A. The four loops (residues 156 to 174, residues 191 to 203, residues 515 to 527 and residues 547 to 556) of the NDV HN protein were deleted or replaced respectively with the corresponding sequences of the hPIV3 HN protein, which was proven to have a second receptor binding site [17, 18]. The oligonucleotide primers were designed (Table 1) and synthesized by Sangon Biotech Co. Ltd., Shanghai, China. The PCR products obtained from overlapping PCR were transformed into Escherichia coli DH5α cells to obtain the entire mutant. The bacterial colonies were selected and sequenced. The positive examples were cultured in Luria-Bertani medium, and plasmids were extracted by using a PLAST Mini KIT I (Omaga,USA).
Indirect immunofluorescence assay (IIFA)
BHK-21 cells grown to 80% confluency in 24-well plates were infected with recombinant vTF7–3 for an hour. Then, with the help of TurboFect™ Transfection Reagent (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA), transfections of the HN mutants were performed. At 24 h post transfection (hpt), the cell monolayers were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 15 min, blocked with PBSA (PBS with 3% bovine serum albumin) for 1 h and incubated with a mixture of two monoclonal antibodies (MAB80144 and MAB80145, Merck Millipore, USA) specific for the NDV HN protein for 2 h followed by Fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-labelled goat anti-rabbit IgG (Beyotime, China) for 30 min. Photographs of the bound fluorescence were taken by a fluorescence inverted microscope (OLYMPUS, Japan).
The cell surface expression efficiency of mutant HN proteins was detected with fluorescence-activated cell sorter (FACS) analysis. At 36 hpt, the cell monolayers were removed from 6-well plates to EP tubes with PBS-EDTA (5 mM EDTA), pelleted, washed twice with PBS, and blocked with PBSA for 30 min at 4 °C. The primary antibody and the secondary antibody used here were the same as those used in the IIFA analysis. Then, after fixation with PBS containing 4% paraformaldehyde for 10 min and resuspending in 0.4 ml PBSA, the cells were subjected to FACS analysis with the CytoFLEX S Flow Cytometer (Beckman Coulter, Inc., California, USA). Cells transfected with the pBSK+ empty vector and wt HN were used as negative and positive controls, respectively.
Syncytium formation assay
Co-transfection with HN mutants and wt F was performed as soon as the monolayer was grown to 80% confluency. At 24 hpt, the cell monolayers were washed twice with PBS, fixed with methanol for 10 min and then stained with Giemsa Stain solution (Solarbio, China) for 15 min. Photographs of the syncytia were captured by inverted microscope (OLYMPUS, Japan). Cells co-transfected with the pBSK+ empty vector and wt F and co-transfected with wt HN and F were used as negative and positive controls, respectively.
Reporter gene method
To quantify the fusion promotion ability of HN mutants, a reporter gene method was performed as previously described [19, 20]. BHK-21 cells were plated in both 12-well plates and 60-mm culture dishes. As the confluency reached 80%, the cell monolayers in the 12-well plates (monolayers A) were infected with recombinant vTF7–3 for an hour and then co-transfected with the desired HN mutants and wt F genes. The cell monolayers in the 60-mm culture dish (monolayers B) were infected with wt vTF7–3 and transfected with plasmid pG1NT7β-gal encoding β-galactosidase. At 16 hpt, equal numbers (1 × 105) of monolayers A and B were mixed in 96-well plates for further incubation. After incubation at 37 °C for 7 h, the β-galactosidase activity of cells was assayed with a β-Galactosidase Assay Kit (Beyotime, China). The level of fusion was quantified by the absorbance at 590 nm with an ELISA reader. The monolayers A co-transfected with the pBSK+ empty vector and wt F and co-transfected with wt HN and F were used as negative and positive controls, respectively.
The lipid mixing in the process of cell fusion can be reflected by the transfer of octadecyl rhodamine b chloride (R18) (Invitrogen, California, USA) from chicken red blood cells (cRBCs) to BHK-21 cells . After being washed three times with cold PBS-CM (PBS containing 0.1 mM CaCl2 and 1 mM MgCl2), 1% cRBC solution was incubated with R18 at room temperature in the dark for 30 min. The 0.1% R18-labelled cRBC suspension was added to the wells of plates containing BHK-21 cells co-transfected with HN mutants and wt F. After incubation at 4 °C for 30 min, the wells were washed three times gently to remove unbound R18-labelled cRBCs and then incubated for 1 h at 37 °C; finally, the lipid mixing was observed under an inverted fluorescence microscope (OLYMPUS, Japan).
Hemadsorption (HAD) assay
The ability of mutants to adsorb cRBCs was detected to determine the receptor binding activity of these mutants. At 24 hpt, the culture medium of BHK-21 monolayers transfected with HN mutants in a 24-well plate was replaced with 1% cRBC solution in serum-free, CO2-independent medium (BI, Israel) with or without zanamivir (a drug designed based on the crystal structure of the influenza virus NA, 2 mM). After being placed at 4 °C for 30 min, the plate was washed three times gently with cold PBS-CM. Subsequently, the plate was observed under an inverted microscope (OLYMPUS, Japan) to capture the bound cRBCs or treated with 50 mM NH4Cl at 4 °C to lyse bound cRBCs, and the absorbance was read at 405 nm with a UV spectrophotometer (Shimadzu, Japan).
Neuraminidase (NA) assay
BHK-21 cells seeded in 12-well plates were transfected with HN mutants in medium with (+) or without (−) zanamivir (2 mM). At 24 hpt, the cells were detached from the plates using 5 mM EDTA in PBS and pelleted by centrifuging at 2000 rpm for 3 min. The pellets were lysed to assay the neuraminidase activity according to the procedures of the Neuraminidase Assay Kit (Beyotime, China). The fluorescence was measured with excitation and emission wavelengths of 360 and 460 nm, respectively. The cells transfected with the pBSK+ empty vector and wt HN acted as negative and positive controls, respectively.
All results were collected from at least three independent experiments and expressed as the mean ± standard deviation (SD). Statistical analysis was calculated by SPSS 17.0 using Student’s t test, and P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Acquisition of mutants and position of the desired amino acids
To identify the conserved amino acids in the second binding site of the NDV HN protein, the amino acid sequences of NDV, hPIV1–4, PIV5 and SV were aligned. As a result, 10 amino acid residues (T167, G171, C172, R174, C196, D198, S202, R516, Y526 and E547) were chosen to be mutated to A, respectively. The homology model was generated based on the crystal structure of NDV HN (PDB ID: 1USR). The localization of the selected amino acids is shown in Fig. 1b. In addition to these site-directed mutants, 8 fragment deletion or replacement mutants corresponding to the four loops (residues 156 to 174, residues 191 to 203, residues 515 to 527 and residues 547 to 556) of the second receptor binding site of NDV HN were also constructed named Ch1, Ch2, Ch3, Ch4, De1, De2, De3 and De4.
Cell surface expression efficiency of mutant HN proteins
IIFA was used to detect whether the mutant proteins were expressed on the surface of BHK-21 cells. As shown in Fig. 2, no detectable fluorescence was observed in mutants Ch1, Ch2, De1, De2, De3 and De4. The other mutants all emitted green fluorescence under blue light. Then, FACS was performed to quantify the cell surface expression efficiency of the mutant HN proteins compared with the wt HN protein. Mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) was used to evaluate the cell surface expression efficiency of the mutants. The FACS results suggested that the expression efficiency of all site-directed mutants was quite comparable to that of wt HN from 83.46 to 106.19% (P > 0.05). However, the fragment deletion or replacement mutants varied notably in the cell surface efficiency. The expression efficiency of mutants Ch1, Ch2, De1, De2, De3 and De4 that showed no fluorescence in IIFA was 0.31 to 22.52% (P < 0.01). Although fluorescence could be detected for mutant Ch4, its MFI was reduced to 49.57% of that of wt HN (P < 0.01). Only the MFI of mutant Ch3 was comparable to that of wt HN (102.50%, P > 0.05). The data shown in Fig. 3 and Table 2 are the average result of three independent experiments.
Fusion promotion ability of HN mutants
The ability of HN mutants to promote cell fusion was evaluated with the results of Giemsa staining, reporter gene method and hemi-fusion assay.
First, Giemsa staining was used to determine the general situation of syncytium formation of HN mutants co-transfected with wt F. As shown in Fig. 4a, b, the ability of mutant G171A to promote cell fusion seemed to be similar to wt HN. Mutants T167A, S202A, R516A, Ch3 and Ch4 could promote cell fusion but showed varying degrees of decline. Moreover, mutants C172A, R174A, C196A, D198A, Y526A and E547A showed no syncytium under the microscope. It is noteworthy that no fusion events were detected for mutants Ch1, Ch2, De1, De2, De3 and De4, which could confirm that they were not expressed as shown in cell surface expression efficiency of mutant HN proteins section. Thus, these mutants were not considered for the following experiments.
Next, a reporter gene method was carried out to quantify the fusion promotion ability of the mutants. As mentioned in the materials and methods section, after incubating the mixture of monolayers A and B, the absorbance was measured, and the data are displayed in Fig. 4c and Table 2. Except for mutant G171A possessing a similar ability to promote fusion to wt HN, the other mutants showed reduced ability to varying degrees. The fusion promotion ability of mutants T167A, S202A, R516A, Ch3 and Ch4 was reduced to 15.89 to 65.26% of that of wt HN. The fusion promotion ability of mutants C172A, R174A, C196A, D198A, Y526A and E547A did not reach 15%.
Finally, a hemi-fusion assay was performed to observe the lipid mixing phenomenon in the fusion process, which can be reflected by the transfer of the lipophilic probe R18 from the cRBC membranes to the transfected BHK-21 cell membranes. The fluorescence images in Fig. 4d indicate that, compared with wt HN, the intensity and scope of fluorescence in the mutants T167A, S202A, R516A, Ch3 and Ch4 were weaker and smaller. The difference between mutant G171A and wt HN could not be distinguished by the naked eye. In addition, the transfer phenomenon of the lipophilic probe R18 could not be detected in mutants C172A, R174A, C196A, D198A, Y526A and E547A.
Receptor binding ability of HN mutants
A 1% cRBC solution was used to detect the receptor binding ability of these desired HN mutants. The unbound cRBCs were washed off, and the images of the adsorbed cRBCs are illustrated in Fig. 5a. In the image of wt HN, the cBRCs were massively adsorbed and distributed uniformly. Compared with wt HN, mutants T167A, G171A, S202A, R516A, Ch3 and Ch4 adsorbed less cRBCs. Additionally, mutants C172A, R174A, C196A, D198A, Y526A and E547A did not show an obvious HAD phenomenon. The bound cRBCs were lysed with 50 mM NH4Cl, and the absorbance of the lysed cells of three independent experiments is shown in Fig. 5b and Table 2. The receptor binding ability of mutants T167A, G171A, S202A, R516A, Ch3 and Ch4 was 55.81, 85.08, 44.53, 69.02, 46.96 and 16.88% of that of wt HN, respectively. Mutants C172A, R174A, C196A, D198A, Y526A and E547A almost lost their receptor binding ability (less than 10%).
Zanamivir is a small molecule receptor analogue that can engage the first receptor binding site of HN and activate the second receptor binding site . In the current study, mutants T167A, G171A, S202A, R516A, Ch3 and Ch4 were treated with zanamivir to determine whether the second receptor binding site really played a role in the existing receptor binding ability. The data are shown in Fig. 5c and Table 2. Mutant T167A increased the level of binding receptor to 107.34% of that of wt HN. Mutants G171A, S202A, R516A, Ch3 and Ch4 all damaged the ability of binding receptor compared with wt HN (93.69, 60.31, 68.68, 41.73 and 23.98%, respectively).
NA activity of HN mutants
With the aid of the Neuraminidase Assay Kit (Beyotime, China), the activity of mutants to hydrolyze receptors from progeny virion particles to prevent viral self-aggregation was detected, and the results are shown in Fig. 6 and Table 2. On the one hand, in the absence of zanamivir, the NA activity of every mutant, to some extent, decreased (42.05 to 81.56%) compared with that of wt HN, except T167A, which had a comparable ability to wt HN. However, the NA activity of C172A did not differ significantly from that of wt HN, nor did D198A. On the other hand, in the presence of zanamivir, the NA activity of the mutants showed small fluctuations to a certain degree with no significant difference compared with that of wt HN.
The ectodomain of paramyxovirus attachment proteins, including the NDV HN, consists of a long stalk that mediates the interaction with the homologous F, and the stalk is connected to the terminal globular domain that has receptor binding ability and NA activity . With respect to the receptor binding site of the globular head of NDV HN, it was reported that the second receptor binding site can activate the stalk of multiple paramyxovirus receptor binding proteins to trigger fusion . Here, we chose 10 targeted residues in the second binding site of NDV HN that are largely conserved among paramyxoviruses. As a result, 18 mutants were constructed, including 10 site-directed mutants and 8 fragment deletion or replacement mutants corresponding to the four loops of the second receptor binding site.
The expression efficiency of these 18 mutants on the cell surface was determined by IIFA and FACS. The 10 site-directed mutants were expressed on the cell surface in similar amounts to wt HN (Figs. 2a and 3a and Table 2). This means that these mutants can maintain the protein structural integrity, and the series of functional changes were not caused by the change in expression efficiency. However, the expression efficiency of fragment deletion or replacement mutants was significantly different compared with wt HN, except for mutant Ch3. In addition, mutants Ch1, Ch2, De1, De2, De3 and De4 showed little expression efficiency. It is possible that these mutants are misfolded or affect the protein translation or transport process.
Infection of host cells by paramyxovirus is accomplished by the interaction of F and HN proteins, which initiates membrane fusion and forms syncytia . The entire phase of membrane fusion is usually divided into three phases: hemi-fusion, pore formation, and pore expansion . The ability of HN mutants to promote cell fusion was evaluated with syncytium formation assay, reporter gene method and hemi-fusion assay in the current study. The fact that mutants Ch1, Ch2, De1, De2, De3 and De4 were not expressed efficiently was confirmed by the syncytium formation assay. Hence, these 6 mutants were not considered for the following experiments of this study. The quantification results of cell fusion showed that of the 12 remaining mutants, only mutant G171A possessed a comparable ability to promote cell fusion with wt HN, while the other 11 mutants reduced, to some extent, the fusion promotion ability. This means that residues T167, C172, R174, C196, D198, S202, R516, Y526 and E547 play an important role in maintaining the fusion promotion ability of the HN protein, especially C172, R174, C196, D198, Y526 and E547, whose substitution to A caused almost complete impairment of the fusion promotion ability. In addition, the results of the hemi-fusion assay indicate that the reduction in fusion promotion ability occurred at the early stage of membrane fusion.
The receptor binding ability of all 12 mutants was reduced, and the results were significantly different from those of the wt HN protein. The decreased degree of receptor binding ability was similar to that of the fusion promotion ability, indicating that there is a correlation between receptor binding and fusion promotion. Many previous studies also highlighted the importance of receptor binding in the membrane fusion process of paramyxovirus [8, 16, 26, 27]. It should be noted that the G171A had a weaker receptor binding ability (85.08%) but stronger fusion promotion ability (104.69%) than wt HN. This indicates that receptor binding is not the only factor affecting fusion promotion. Furthermore, in this study, we used zanamivir to remove the function of the first receptor binding site . The receptor binding ability of most of the examined mutants fluctuated slightly after treatment with zanamivir, except T167A. Compared with wt HN, the receptor binding ability of T167A improved greatly from 55.81 to 107.34%. This result might have occurred because the second receptor binding site acts much more avidly than the first site during the fusion process, as suggested by a previous study .
The transmission of NDV depends on the removal of sialic acid from the cell surface by HN NA activity. It was mentioned in a previous study that the second binding site did not mediate NA activity . However, the results of the NA assay in the current study demonstrated that the NA activity of all mutants was damaged to a certain degree, although some mutants (T167A, C172A and D198A) showed no significant difference with wt HN. The data of mutants R174A, Y526F, Y526H and E547D in a previous study supported our results . Additionally, the effect of all mutations on NA activity is moderate, indicating that they only have a limited effect on the first receptor binding site. Therefore, we think it is reasonable to assume that some residues (G171, R174, C196, S202, R516, Y526 and E547) in the second receptor binding site are related to HN NA activity. However, the reason why mutants C172A, R174A, C196A, D198A, Y526A and E547A did not have detectable HAD ability was unclear. It is quite likely that the mutations of residues transformed the spatial structure of the HN protein, which affected the exposure of the centrally located first receptor binding site. In addition, we can consider it from another perspective: these mutants may not interfere with receptor binding and NA activity of the first receptor binding site, but interfere with the formation of the second receptor binding site, which is responsible for tight binding (HAD) of the HN-F complex (and thus the virus), since this site binds sialic acid with high avidity. As a consequence of the NA activity by the first receptor binding site and the lack of the second receptor binding site, the HN-F complex (and thus the virus) is not efficiently retained at the cell membrane resulting in an apparent lack of HAD ability and fusion promotion ability, while remaining NA activity. However, when zanamivir was added to the medium, the NA activity of the mutants became comparable to that of wt HN. The reason for this phenomenon may be that zanamivir works efficiently and blocks the action of NA resulting in both wt HN and mutants almost loss of NA activity. The fact that the NA activity of wt HN with zanamivir declined sharply compared with that of wt HN without zanamivir (10.18% ± 3.05%) confirmed the above presumption. As for the much lower absolute values, although it cannot be excluded that zanamivir still has an effect, the slight relative increase on NA activity is probably also due to larger variation at these low levels.
In this study, the HAD ability and fusion promotion ability of mutant Y526A decreased to 1.78 and 8.38% of those of wt HN, respectively. However, in a previous study, mutation of Y526 had enhanced fusion promotion ability but had almost no HAD activity. The reason given can be concluded in two speculations. One is that the 293 T cells used in their study carry exogenous sialic acid receptors that can bind to HN and block the binding of HN to red blood cells. The other is that the mutation of Y526 to F/H leads to the formation of a new HN structure similar to the structure that appears when the receptor binds to HN . The different fusion promotion ability is likely because of the different NDV strains and/or cell types used in experiments, which may have different sensitivities. Another study using BHK-21 cells to express the mutant Y526A showed similar results (7.9 and 3.2% of wt HN) to ours . In addition, A was chosen in the current study because the short side chain of A has a minimal disruptive impact on the whole protein structure. While in mutants Y526F and Y526H, the substitution might cause the movement of F/H and thereby propagate the conformational change signal to the dimer interface leading to fusion promotion. If it makes sense, mutant Y526A showed no fusion promotion, which may be because the slight change caused by A cannot form the correct conformational change signal. Thus, the loss of HAD ability is equal to the loss of fusion promotion ability.
Residue D198 was mutated into other amino acids (R, E, L and S) in a previous study. The results showed that none of the D198-mutated proteins had a detectable amount of HAD ability, NA activity or fusion promotion ability, except D198E, which has HAD ability (3%) and fusion promotion ability (7%) . Here, mutant D198A possessed only 4.42% HAD ability of wt HN, but the NA activity in the absence of zanamivir and the fusion promotion ability were 73.15 and 10.54%, respectively. The reason why the fusion promotion ability of mutant D198A is much stronger than that of D198E may be due to its remaining NA activity. The fragment deletion or replacement mutants, as the complement of site-directed mutants, did not express sufficiently in this study. Only mutants Ch3 and Ch4 were expressed at detectable levels, which means that the loops 515 to 527 and 547 to 556 of NDV HN are consistent with hPIV3 HN in maintaining protein structural integrity. The cell surface expression efficiency of mutant Ch3 was similar to that of wt HN, even so, the HAD ability, NA activity and fusion promotion ability were all reduced (46.96, 63.06 and 33.77%, respectively). The corresponding data for mutant Ch4 were 16.88, 43.91 and 15.89%, respectively. However, the expression efficiency decreased to 49.57%; thus, inadequate expression cannot be ruled out as a reason for the loss of function of mutant Ch4. Therefore, due to the maintained cell surface expression efficiency and diminished function, the loop 515 to 527 corresponding to mutant Ch3 could be considered as an optional region for developing vaccines and drugs for both NDV and hPIV3.
In summary, the conserved residues of the second receptor binding site of NDV HN involved in this research (residues T167, G171, C172, R174, C196, D198, S202, R516, Y526 and E547) are involved in the three basic functions of HN without affecting protein cell surface expression: residues C172, R174, C196, D198, Y526 and E547 are all indispensable to the HAD ability and fusion promotion ability because mutation of them caused abolishment of the two abilities; residues T167, S202 and R516 also mediate the HAD and fusion promotion abilities but the importance of them is less than the former six residues; residue G171 is related to the HAD ability but not the fusion promotion ability; and all the residues can modulate the NA activity of HN. Since the stalk mainly mediates the interaction with the homologous F protein, the incident causing the impaired fusion promotion ability may occur in two stages: the production of the corresponding signal mediated by the head and/or the transmission of the signal from head to stalk. This study of HN will provide fundamental data to further clarify the mechanism of action of this multifunctional protein.
Availability of data and materials
avian paramyxovirus type 1
chicken red blood cells
Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium
fluorescence-activated cell sorter
fetal calf serum
human parainfluenza viruses
indirect immunofluorescence assay
mean fluorescence intensity
Newcastle disease virus
parainfluenza virus 5
Pawelczyk M, Kowalski ML. The role of human Parainfluenza virus infections in the immunopathology of the respiratory tract. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2017;17(3):16.
Clayton BA. Nipah virus: transmission of a zoonotic paramyxovirus. Curr Opin Virol. 2017;22:97–104.
Bajimaya S, Hayashi T, Takimoto T. Rescue of Sendai virus from Cloned cDNA. Methods Mol Biol (Clifton, NJ). 2017;1602:103–10.
Rubin S, Eckhaus M, Rennick LJ, Bamford CG, Duprex WP. Molecular biology, pathogenesis and pathology of mumps virus. J Pathol. 2015;235(2):242–52.
Liu Y, Sun C, Chi M, Wen H, Zhao L, Song Y, Liu N, Wang Z. Genetic characterization and phylogenetic analysis of Newcastle disease virus from China. Infect Genet Evol. 2019;75:103958.
Smith EC, Popa A, Chang A, Masante C, Dutch RE. Viral entry mechanisms: the increasing diversity of paramyxovirus entry. FEBS J. 2009;276(24):7217–27.
Lamb RA, Paterson RG, Jardetzky TS. Paramyxovirus membrane fusion: lessons from the F and HN atomic structures. Virology. 2006;344(1):30–7.
Li J, Quinlan E, Mirza A, Iorio RM. Mutated form of the Newcastle disease virus hemagglutinin-neuraminidase interacts with the homologous fusion protein despite deficiencies in both receptor recognition and fusion promotion. J Virol. 2004;78(10):5299–310.
Porotto M, Devito I, Palmer SG, Jurgens EM, Yee JL, Yokoyama CC, Pessi A, Moscona A. Spring-loaded model revisited: paramyxovirus fusion requires engagement of a receptor binding protein beyond initial triggering of the fusion protein. J Virol. 2011;85(24):12867–80.
Zaitsev V, von Itzstein M, Groves D, Kiefel M, Takimoto T, Portner A, Taylor G. Second sialic acid binding site in Newcastle disease virus hemagglutinin-neuraminidase: implications for fusion. J Virol. 2004;78(7):3733–41.
Langedijk JP, Daus FJ, van Oirschot JT. Sequence and structure alignment of Paramyxoviridae attachment proteins and discovery of enzymatic activity for a morbillivirus hemagglutinin. J Virol. 1997;71(8):6155–67.
Portner A, Scroggs RA, Metzger DW. Distinct functions of antigenic sites of the HN glycoprotein of Sendai virus. Virology. 1987;158(1):61–8.
Crennell S, Takimoto T, Portner A, Taylor G. Crystal structure of the multifunctional paramyxovirus hemagglutinin-neuraminidase. Nat Struct Biol. 2000;7(11):1068–74.
Merz DC, Prehm P, Scheid A, Choppin PW. Inhibition of the neuraminidase of paramyxoviruses by halide ions: a possible means of modulating the two activities of the HN protein. Virology. 1981;112(1):296–305.
Porotto M, Fornabaio M, Greengard O, Murrell MT, Kellogg GE, Moscona A. Paramyxovirus receptor-binding molecules: engagement of one site on the hemagglutinin-neuraminidase protein modulates activity at the second site. J Virol. 2006;80(3):1204–13.
Takimoto T, Taylor GL, Connaris HC, Crennell SJ, Portner A. Role of the hemagglutinin-neuraminidase protein in the mechanism of paramyxovirus-cell membrane fusion. J Virol. 2002;76(24):13028–33.
Porotto M, Fornabaio M, Kellogg GE, Moscona A. A second receptor binding site on human parainfluenza virus type 3 hemagglutinin-neuraminidase contributes to activation of the fusion mechanism. J Virol. 2007;81(7):3216–28.
Mishin VP, Watanabe M, Taylor G, Devincenzo J, Bose M, Portner A, Alymova IV. N-linked glycan at residue 523 of human parainfluenza virus type 3 hemagglutinin-neuraminidase masks a second receptor-binding site. J Virol. 2010;84(6):3094–100.
Navaratnarajah CK, Oezguen N, Rupp L, Kay L, Leonard VH, Braun W, Cattaneo R. The heads of the measles virus attachment protein move to transmit the fusion-triggering signal. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2011;18(2):128–34.
Jardetzky TS, Lamb RA. Activation of paramyxovirus membrane fusion and virus entry. Curr Opin Virol. 2014;5:24–33.
Bagai S, Lamb RA. Quantitative measurement of paramyxovirus fusion: differences in requirements of glycoproteins between simian virus 5 and human parainfluenza virus 3 or Newcastle disease virus. J Virol. 1995;69(11):6712–9.
Melanson VR, Iorio RM. Addition of N-glycans in the stalk of the Newcastle disease virus HN protein blocks its interaction with the F protein and prevents fusion. J Virol. 2006;80(2):623–33.
Porotto M, Salah Z, DeVito I, Talekar A, Palmer SG, Xu R, Wilson IA, Moscona A. The second receptor binding site of the globular head of the Newcastle disease virus hemagglutinin-neuraminidase activates the stalk of multiple paramyxovirus receptor binding proteins to trigger fusion. J Virol. 2012;86(10):5730–41.
Connaris H, Takimoto T, Russell R, Crennell S, Moustafa I, Portner A, Taylor G. Probing the sialic acid binding site of the hemagglutinin-neuraminidase of Newcastle disease virus: identification of key amino acids involved in cell binding, catalysis, and fusion. J Virol. 2002;76(4):1816–24.
Xie W, Wen H, Chu F, Yan S, Lin B, Xie W, Liu Y, Ren G, Zhao L, Song Y, Sun C, Wang Z. Mutations in the DI-DII linker of human Parainfluenza virus type 3 fusion protein result in diminished fusion activity. PLoS One. 2015;10(8):e0136474.
Guillaume V, Aslan H, Ainouze M, Guerbois M, Wild TF, Buckland R, Langedijk JP. Evidence of a potential receptor-binding site on the Nipah virus G protein (NiV-G): identification of globular head residues with a role in fusion promotion and their localization on an NiV-G structural model. J Virol. 2006;80(15):7546–54.
Talekar A, Moscona A, Porotto M. Measles virus fusion machinery activated by sialic acid binding globular domain. J Virol. 2013;87(24):13619–27.
Mahon PJ, Mirza AM, Iorio RM. Role of the two sialic acid binding sites on the Newcastle disease virus HN protein in triggering the interaction with the F protein required for the promotion of fusion. J Virol. 2011;85(22):12079–82.
Sun C, Wen H, Chen Y, Chu F, Lin B, Ren G, Song Y, Wang Z. Roles of the highly conserved amino acids in the globular head and stalk region of the Newcastle disease virus HN protein in the membrane fusion process. Biosci Trends. 2015;9(1):56–64.
Deng R, Wang Z, Mahon PJ, Marinello M, Mirza A, Iorio RM. Mutations in the Newcastle disease virus hemagglutinin-neuraminidase protein that interfere with its ability to interact with the homologous F protein in the promotion of fusion. Virology. 1999;253(1):43–54.
We sincerely thank Dr. Bernard Moss of National Institutes of Health for the wt and recombinant vaccinia virus vTF7-3 and Dr. Ronald M. Iorio of University of Massachusetts Medical School for providing the recombinant plasmid vectors.
This work was supported by grants from National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.81672011) and the Fundamental Research Funds of Shandong University (2015JC044).
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Consent for publication
All the authors consent to publish.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
About this article
Cite this article
Liu, Y., Chi, M., Liu, Y. et al. Roles of the highly conserved amino acids in the second receptor binding site of the Newcastle disease virus HN protein. Virol J 16, 164 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12985-019-1273-y
- Newcastle disease virus
- Receptor binding
- Fusion promotion