Viral metagenomics of aphids present in bean and maize plots on mixed-use farms in Kenya reveals the presence of three dicistroviruses including a novel Big Sioux River virus-like dicistrovirus
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 19 July 2017
Accepted: 20 September 2017
Published: 2 October 2017
Aphids are major vectors of plant viruses. Common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) and maize (Zea mays L.) are important crops that are vulnerable to aphid herbivory and aphid-transmitted viruses. In East and Central Africa, common bean is frequently intercropped by smallholder farmers to provide fixed nitrogen for cultivation of starch crops such as maize. We used a PCR-based technique to identify aphids prevalent in smallholder bean farms and next generation sequencing shotgun metagenomics to examine the diversity of viruses present in aphids and in maize leaf samples. Samples were collected from farms in Kenya in a range of agro-ecological zones.
Cytochrome oxidase 1 (CO1) gene sequencing showed that Aphis fabae was the sole aphid species present in bean plots in the farms visited. Sequencing of total RNA from aphids using the Illumina platform detected three dicistroviruses. Maize leaf RNA was also analysed. Identification of Aphid lethal paralysis virus (ALPV), Rhopalosiphum padi virus (RhPV), and a novel Big Sioux River virus (BSRV)-like dicistrovirus in aphid and maize samples was confirmed using reverse transcription-polymerase chain reactions and sequencing of amplified DNA products. Phylogenetic, nucleotide and protein sequence analyses of eight ALPV genomes revealed evidence of intra-species recombination, with the data suggesting there may be two ALPV lineages. Analysis of BSRV-like virus genomic RNA sequences revealed features that are consistent with other dicistroviruses and that it is phylogenetically closely related to dicistroviruses of the genus Cripavirus.
The discovery of ALPV and RhPV in aphids and maize further demonstrates the broad occurrence of these dicistroviruses. Dicistroviruses are remarkable in that they use plants as reservoirs that facilitate infection of their insect replicative hosts, such as aphids. This is the first report of these viruses being isolated from either organism. The BSRV-like sequences represent a potentially novel dicistrovirus infecting A. fabae.
KeywordsMetagenomics Phylogenetics Recombination Dicistrovirus Potyvirus Vector Aphid Epidemiology
Aphids are important insect pests of plants and vectors for plant-infecting viruses [1, 2]. Aphids are themselves infected by viruses, which may cause disease in the insects [1, 3]. For this reason, aphid-infecting viruses have been investigated with respect to their potential use in biological control or as agents that might interfere with aphid-mediated transmission of phytopathogenic viruses [4, 5]. However, viruses can sometimes act as mutualists, as demonstrated in at least one case for aphid-infecting viruses by a DNA virus, the Densovirus Dysaphis plantaginea virus, which promotes production of winged forms of its host, the rosy apple aphid, which enhances dissemination of both the host and virus .
The Dicistroviridae, which are Picorna-like positive-sense RNA viruses, are among the best-studied pathogenic viruses of aphids . Aphid lethal paralysis virus (ALPV) and Rhopalosiphum padi virus (RhPV) are members of the family Dicistroviridae and the genus Cripaviridae (type species, Cricket paralysis virus: CrPV) . Studies of CrPV revealed two internal ribosome entry sites preceding each of the two non-overlapping open reading frames (ORFs) of the dicistronic RNA genome . ORF1 encodes non-structural proteins: a suppressor of RNA silencing; a helicase; a protease; the viral genome linked protein (VPg), and the RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp). ORF2 encodes four structural proteins, VP1–4 . ORFs 1 and 2 are translated from the genomic RNA, producing polyproteins that are cleaved to yield the mature viral proteins . RhPV, first isolated from R. padi in 1981, decreases aphid longevity and fecundity [10, 11]. ALPV was isolated from R. padi in South Africa and shares many biophysical properties with RhPV [12, 13]. RhPV has a genome that is slightly larger (10Kb) than that of ALPV (9.8Kb) [14, 15]. Both RhPV and ALPV can be transmitted between insects (horizontal transmission) and transovarially (vertical transmission) . Remarkably, these aphid-infecting viruses are also transmitted horizontally through plants, which serve as infection reservoirs but are not considered to be hosts, since they do not support virus replication . Big Sioux River virus (BSRV) was first isolated from honeybees (Apis mellifera) following a study of the bee microbiome to identify potential causes of bee colony collapse disorder in the United States . BSRV has also been isolated from mosquitoes (Culex tritaeniorhynchus) and in the soybean aphid (Aphis glycines) in China [17, 18]. Neither the diversity of aphids nor the range of viruses infecting them has been examined in East Africa. We carried out viral metagenomic studies on aphid and plant samples collected on smallholder farms in from different agroecological zones in Kenya, focusing on farms where common bean and/or maize were grown.
Aphid and maize sampling sites
Maize leaf samples were collected from 14 sites in three counties in Kenya (Fig. 1). These were collected over the months of June–August from Baringo (semi-arid, highland), Machakos (semi-arid, lowland), Kitui (semi-arid, lowland) and Nakuru (humid, highland) (Additional file 1: Supplementary Table S1).
Trapping of aphids
To trap winged (alate) aphids, five yellow bowls (22 cm diameter) containing approximately 300 ml of 1% (w/v) SDS mixture were set up at the corners and the center of a 10x10m area within a bean plot. These traps were placed on stilts raised to the same height as the bean plants and left for two hours during the warmest part of the day (approximately 12:00 to 14:00 East Africa Time). Aphids were recovered from traps using plastic microbiological inoculation loops (VWR International bvba, Leuven, Belgium) and transferred individually to 1.5 ml micro-centrifuge tubes containing 500 μl of RNALater (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA). For collection of wingless (apterous) aphids, bean plants within the proximity of the traps were selected at random and examined for wingless aphids for capture and preservation in RNALater. Aphid samples were transported in racks and stored at 4 °C for up to 4 days before processing. Apterous aphids were collected at all four sites (Fig. 1). Alate aphids were available only at the Ndeiya site (Fig. 1).
DNA and RNA extraction from aphids
For nucleic acid extraction, ten wingless aphids were pooled together per sampling site into nine sample pools (P1-P9). The winged aphids were not pooled and were treated as individual samples (labelled as samples S16-S45) (Additional file 1: Table S1). Aphids were transferred to 2.0 ml screw-capped tubes, prefilled with 1.4-mm (diameter) ceramic beads for homogenizing using the MagNA Lyser® instrument (Roche, Basel, Switzerland). Lysis buffer (200 μl) was added to the tubes and the samples homogenized by shaking for 30 s at 7000 Hz. Of the supernatant, 120 μl was set aside for RNA extraction and 80 μl retained for DNA extraction. Semi-automated RNA and DNA extraction for RNAseq Illumina sequencing and CO1 PCR identification was done using the MagNA Pure® LC RNA Isolation kit III and MagNA Pure® LC DNA Isolation Kit II (Tissue) respectively on the MagNa Pure LC instrument (Roche) following the manufacturer’s instructions. Extracted RNA and DNA was analysed for concentration and purity using a Nanodrop® ND1000 spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific).
Cytochrome oxidase subunit 1 gene sequencing of individual aphid samples
Cytochrome oxidase subunit 1 (CO1) gene sequencing using template DNA from individual aphids was conducted using the aphid-specific primers, Favret F and Favret R (sense 5′-ACC AGT TTT AGC AGG TGC TAT TAC-3′ antisense, 5′-GTA TAT CGA CGA GGT ATA CCA TTT-3′) using DNA from individual aphids as template (S16-S45). The primers bordered a 700-base pair (bp) region of the CO1 gene . Purified PCR products were sequenced in both directions by automated Sanger sequencing [20, 21].
Library preparation for next generation sequencing of aphid samples
Thirty-nine libraries were prepared for sequencing using the Illumina MiSeq system. Of these libraries, nine consisted of pools of ten aphids taken from the area sampled. The remaining 30 were made from individual aphids caught in traps. Libraries were prepared using the TruSeq RNA v2 kit (Illumina, San Diego, CA) protocol as per the manufacturer’s instructions. Libraries were normalised, pooled and sequenced in two runs using the Illumina MiSeq system. Paired end reads were generated using the 2 × 250 cycle V2 kit on the MiSeq.
RNA extraction from maize samples and next generation sequencing
RNA was extracted using Trizol (Ambion) as per manufacturer’s instructions. Ribosomal RNA (rRNA) depletion was performed with Ribo-Zero Magnetic Kits (Plant Leaf – Epicentre), and depletion confirmed on a pre-cast 6% TBE-urea gel (Novex, Life Technologies). Indexed stranded libraries were constructed using Scriptseq V2 RNA-Seq Library Preparation kits (Epicentre) and Scriptseq Index PCR primers (Epicentre). Purification steps were performed using Agencourt AMPure XP beads. Library quantity and quality were checked using Qubit (Life Technologies) and on a Bioanalyzer High Sensitivity DNA Chip (Agilent Technologies). Libraries were sent to Beijing Genomics Institute for 100 bp paired-end sequencing on one lane of a HiSeq 2000 (Illumina).
The quality of reads generated was checked using FastQC (available online at: www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc/). The reads were trimmed to attain optimum quality using the dynamic trim function of SolexaQA  and FASTX-Toolkit (http://hannonlab.cshl.edu/fastx_toolkit/). A de novo assembly of the reads was done using Trinity (http://trinityrnaseq.github.io/) based on the de Bruijn graph algorithm. The resulting contigs from de novo assembly were analysed by BLASTn against a virus database to detect all viral sequences present in the data. In the Virfind online analysis pipeline, the sequences were trimmed (default setting ~5 bases). De novo assembly was performed using Trinity (v.2.0.2) but where the average sequence length was ≤80 nucleotides, de novo sequence assembly was done by Velvet with kmer = 15, 19, 23, 27, to generate sequences ≥90 nucleotides. Where the average sequence length ≤ 40 nucleotides, de novo sequence assembly was done by Velvet with kmer = 11, 13, to generate sequences ≥90 nucleotides. Assembled contigs were subjected to a BLASTn search in NCBI at the default e-value (0.01) to generate annotated sequences. All sequences not detected as ‘virus’ by BLASTn were subjected to a BLASTx search against all GenBank virus proteins with the e-value at the default (0.01). For the maize samples, libraries were de-multiplexed allowing one error within the index sequence and de novo assembly done with Trinity using a custom script.
Confirmation of presence of ALPV, RhPV and BSRV-like viruses from aphid and maize samples by reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR)
To confirm the presence of ALPV, RhPV and BSRV-like viruses in the pooled samples, cDNA was made by reverse transcribing 500 ng of total RNA extracted from aphids in Pools 1–9 using GoScript First Strand synthesis system (Invitrogen). Random hexamers were used as primers in a total volume of 20 μl and reverse transcription done at 42 °C for 50 min as recommended by the manufacturer. Primers for ALPV based on the KE Aphid P7 and KE Aphid P9 sequences were ALFWD1 5′-CAA AAC AAT ACA AAA TGTC-3′ and ALRV1 5′-GGT TTG TTT AAA ATC GTT GCC-3′ targeting a 511 bp region corresponding to the sequence positions 511 and 1022 in ORF1 of the ALPV genome. The primers for BSRV-like sequences were based on sequence S37 and were: BSRV1 FWD-5′-ACA ATT TAT ATC GTT TAG GTT-3′, and BSRV1 REV-5′-TTA CTA AGG TTT AAA TCT TTA-3′ amplifying a 511 bp region between (approximate 511–1015) in ORF1 of the S42 BSRV genome. For ORF2, primers BSRV2 FWD-5′-GTC AAA ACT AAA TTT CAT TCA-3′ and BSRV2 REV-5′-GG TGT AAT CAT GTG AAA TCT T-3′ were used targeting a 555 bp region (approximate positions 8467–9022). Primers for RhPV detection in aphid samples were RhPVF1 5′-GCA AAC TCA GTA TCT TCA GC-3′ and RhPVR1 5′-TTT GAT TTA TGG CGT GGT GG-3′, which have previously been used in RhPV detection . For RhPV detection from maize samples, custom primers were designed from the assembled RhPV sequence from sample T2F2S4 (sequence available in Additional file 2: Text file S1). The two primer pairs RPV_200_F1–5′-TTT GGA AGA CGT GTG CGAGA-3′/ RPV_1100_R1–5′-TCG TGC AGC TG GAA CGAAT-3′ (approximate positions 228–1016) and RPV_1350_F1–5′-GAT GGG TAC ACT GGA CAG CC-3′/ RPV_ 2300_R1–5′-CTC TCG CTC GCA GCA AATTC-3′ (approximate position 1401–2236) targeted 789 bp and 836 bp long regions of the assembled sequence, respectively. The primer sequences and sequences from the amplicons generated are shown in the additional information (Additional file 3: Table S2).
For PCR, 1 μl of cDNA solution was used in the reaction using the various primers and Biomix Red® PCR premix (Bioline, London, UK) in a 20 μl reaction. Cycling conditions for all primers were 3 min at 94 °C followed by 35 cycles of 30s at 94 °C/ 30s at 55 °C/ 1 min at 72 °C and a final extension of 7 min 72 °C. PCR products were analysed on a 2% agarose gel in 1X TBE containing Gel Red and electrophoresed in 1X TBE buffer. PCR products were purified and sequenced in both directions by automated Sanger sequencing [20, 21] at the Biosciences eastern and central Africa Hub at the International Livestock Research Institute in Nairobi, Kenya or Source Biosciences (Cambridge UK).
Phylogenetic and sequence analysis of ALPV and BSRV-like genomes
Multiple sequence alignments were done using MUSCLE  in Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis version 6.0. (MEGA 6) . The evolutionary history was inferred using either the Neighbor-Joining method . ORF Finder (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/orffinder/) was used for ORF prediction. To annotate the proteins encoded by the ORFs, an online search was conducted in the NCBI conserved domain database (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Structure/cdd/cdd.shtml) for the location of conserved domains.
Pairwise comparisons for percentage similarity at nucleotide and protein levels
The percentage differences between the nucleotide sequences of the isolates was done by doing a multiple sequence alignment using MUSCLE in the Sequence Demarcation Tool software version 1.2 .
Analyses to detect recombination was done using RDP4 software package. Alignments and analyses were performed for ORF 1 and ORF 2 separately. Default parameters were used for the RDP , GENCONV , MAXCHI , 3Seq , SiScan  and CHIMAERA  methods selected for the analysis. A Bonferroni corrected p value of 0.05 was considered significant. Evidence of recombination was accepted if it was supported in at least three different methods with a p value >10−6.
Aphid species identification by Cytochrome oxidase subunit 1 gene sequencing revealed that Aphis fabae was the only aphid species present in bean plots at sampled sites
Aphids were trapped in bean fields at the locations shown in Fig. 1. Nucleic acids were extracted from aphids for PCR-based aphid species identification and for Illumina sequencing of RNA. Following PCR of aphid DNA using primers specific for CO1, a basic local alignment search tool (BLAST)  search of the generated CO1 gene sequences showed that the samples were all A. fabae. The CO1 sequences generated from Sanger sequencing are available in the additional files (Additional file 4: Text S3). Confirmatory results were provided by analysis conducted using Virfind online bioinformatics platform (http://virfind.org/j/virfind-pipeline) . This analysis yielded longer CO1 gene sequence reads than from the automated Sanger sequencing and likewise identified the sequences as originating from A. fabae (Additional file 5: Text S4). A summary of results of the CO1 gene identification using the BLAST tool using sequences from Sanger sequencing and from Virfind are shown in the additional files (Additional file 6: Table S3).
Detection of dicistroviruses RNA sequences in aphid and maize samples
Aphid and maize samples containing dicistrovirus sequences
Genbank ID of closest match and annotation in GenBank
Big Sioux River virus
Big Sioux River virus
Big Sioux River virus
Big Sioux River virus
Big Sioux River virus
Big Sioux River virus
Big Sioux River virus
Big Sioux River virus
Big Sioux River virus
Big Sioux River virus
Big Sioux River virus
Aphid lethal paralysis virus
Aphid lethal paralysis virus
Aphid lethal paralysis virus
Aphid lethal paralysis virus
Aphid lethal paralysis virus
Aphid lethal paralysis virus
Rhopalosiphum padi virus
Geographic origin, isolation host and genome segment characteristics of the 8 ALPV isolates examined in this study
Country of origin
Genome size (bp)
KE Aphid P7
KE Aphid P9
One maize sample, T2F3S4, contained a 6816 bp sequence annotated as RhPV (Additional file 2: Text file S1). Additionally, there were shorter (~550 bp) assembled sequences annotated as RhPV from aphid samples (Additional file 8: Text file S5). By comparison, the full-length RhPV genomes available in GenBank are 10Kb in length. For the purposes of this study, RhPV sequences were not analysed further except by confirming the presence of the viral RNAs using RT-PCR and sequencing of the DNA products.
Eleven samples had sequences ranging from 9640 to 10,281 nucleotides long annotated as ‘Big Sioux River virus’ following de novo assembly (Table 1). The variation in the length of the genomic RNA sequences was mainly due to partial sequence assembly of the 3′-untranslated region. Of the 11 sequences, sample S37 (GenBank number KY933255) was the longest assembly at 10,281 nucleotides long including a 15 nucleotide polyA tail and is most likely the most complete of the BSRV-like genomes assembled. Though GenBank contained no full-length genomes for BSRV to allow complete sequence comparisons, the available sequences were sufficient for authentication of the BSRV-like virus RNAs. A list of other virus-like sequences detected from the aphid samples following BLASTx are in the additional information (Additional file 9: Table S4).
RT-PCR confirmed the presence of ALPV, RhPV and BSRV-like virus sequences in aphid and maize leaf samples from Kenya
We used RT-PCR and DNA sequencing to confirm the presence of the three putative dicistroviruses. For the aphid samples, cDNA templates were synthesized using RNA from samples P4, P5, P6, P7 and P9 and virus-specific primers used to confirm presence of the three viruses (Additional file 3: Table S2). PCR products generated using ALPV- and BSRV-specific primers from the pooled aphid samples migrated to approximately 500–550 bp on agarose gels, which was within the expected size range of the primers used (Additional file 10: Fig. S1). A BLAST search for homology confirmed that the amplified sequences had similarity to ALPV and BSRV-like viruses. The identity of RhPV was confirmed in maize samples by RT-PCR and Sanger sequencing (Additional file 3: Table S2; Additional file 11: Fig. S2). However, we were unable to confirm presence of RhPV from the aphid samples by RT-PCR using either the custom primers used to detect the virus in the maize sample or by primers used by other groups .
Analysis of ALPV sequences
To predict the domains encoded by the ORFs, analysis of the ORF sequences was conducted in the NCBI conserved domain database. Results revealed the predicted regions coding for the helicase and RdRp domains in ORF1 and four capsid proteins in ORF2. The position of the protease domain was determined by searching for the conserved protein sequence ‘VVV QNR GSY TYH AVT FFG DCG SIL IAS NAA ITQ KIM GMH IAG ITH MNKG’ for this region  at residues 1395–1443 of the ORF1 protein sequence when translated from the genomic RNA. A schematic of the ALPV genome and the mapping depth is shown in Fig. 2.
Phylogenetic and sequence comparisons between different ALPV sequences
When we compared the similarity of ORF1 and ORF2 sequences from the genomic RNA of the ALPV isolates we found out that KE Aphid P7 and KE Aphid P9 shared 98.6% and 99.3% similarity in ORF1 and ORF2, respectively. When the two isolates were compared to KE Maize, the similarity was about 90.3% and 86% in ORF1 and ORF2 respectively. All three isolates from Kenya had least similarity to the isolates from Spain and the USA (approximately 83%) in both ORFs (Additional file 12: Table S5).
Recombination analyses of ALPV ORFs
Recombination events identified by the RDP4 program
Potential Parental sequences
Score for five detection methods in RDP4
KE Aphid P7
KE Aphid P9
KE Aphid P9
Sequence and phylogenetic analyses reveal that BSRV-like isolates may belong to a new dicistrovirus species
From BLAST analyses, the 11 nucleotide sequences from this study had 87% similarity to isolate BSRV1 (GenBank number: JF423195.1), which is 1473 nucleotides long and encodes part of the non-structural polyprotein (ORF1) of BSRV. A BLAST analysis comparing ORF2 sequences from our BSRV-like sequences and an ORF2 sequence from GenBank, BSRV4 (GenBank number: JF423198.1) revealed 77% and 86% similarity at nucleotide and protein sequence comparisons respectively. The nucleotide similarity among the BSRV-like viruses was 98–99%.
In this article, we describe DNA-based species identification of winged aphids collected from farms in Kenya and the detection, using viral metagenomics, of dicistrovirus sequences in these aphids and in maize leaf samples. We found that A. fabae was the only aphid species present in the bean plots sampled, despite these being located on small farms that had mixed cropping systems. The lack of aphid diversity was surprising, given the diversity of plants present on the farms. For example, at the Ndeiya sampling site, beans were intercropped with maize and potato, and a wide variety of fruit trees and seasonal vegetable crops such as cabbage and amaranth were present in adjoining plots. The absence of aphids other than A. fabae could be due to two reasons. Firstly, the sampled plots may have had crop combinations that contained plant hosts unfavourable for other aphid species. Secondly, there may have been a seasonal effect on aphid diversity. Literature on the seasonal variation of aphids, in East Africa and Kenya specifically, is scant but past surveys conducted in Kenyan bean farms found that A. fabae and A. gossypii were the most prevalent aphids over the April to June long rainy season [37, 38] but no information was previously available for the October to November short rainy season.
Viral metagenomic analysis of aphids and maize leaf samples detected three dicistroviruses: ALPV, RhPV, and a novel BSRV-like virus. ALPV and RhPV have been detected in R. padi, A. fabae and maize in South Africa [11, 12], but not previously in East or Central Africa. The discovery of BSRV-like viruses in A. fabae is, to our knowledge, the first report from Africa. Phylogenetic comparison of the ALPV isolates from our study with those identified by others and deposited in GenBank revealed two main clades. These results are consistent with the analysis of Liu and colleagues , who also found two main clades for ALPV and suggested classification of ALPV isolates into two new species. Viral species demarcation is normally contingent on three criteria: evidence of different natural hosts; serological differences, and amino acid sequence identity between the capsid proteins being less than 90% . The Spanish and US isolates that are phylogenetically in a separate clade from other ALPV isolates are the best candidates for reclassification but they fulfill only the third criterion. In our study, isolates obtained in Kenya from maize and A. fabae showed genetic variation, indicating that there could be more than one lineage of ALPV. However, the Kenyan isolates did not meet the divergence thresholds for reclassification as separate species.
Recombination is a powerful driver of viral speciation, especially in viruses with monopartite genomes [41, 42]. For viruses with multipartite genomes, recombination can occur more in one of the genomic RNA components though the overall rate of recombination is infrequent [43, 44]. Our sequence analyses have revealed the first evidence of recombination among for ALPV. The results point to the likelihood that the three isolates (KE Aphid P7, KE Aphid P9 and Israel) are separate strains from isolate KE Maize and this difference was caused by a recombination event.
There is currently no full genome for BSRV in GenBank and, therefore, our isolates may be BSRV or could be a BSRV-like, novel dicistrovirus species infecting A. fabae. The BSRV-like sequences from Kenya cluster phylogenetically with viruses of the genus Cripavirus. From previous reports, BSRV appears to be a multi-host pathogen; having been previously detected in honeybees, mosquitoes and soybean aphids [16–18]. All discoveries of BSRV have been through metagenomic studies and hence BSRV is yet to be formally classified by the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses (ICTV), which until recently has required evidence of biological properties such as pathogenicity, host range and epidemiology. However, due to the increasing rate of discovery of novel viruses by metagenomics, the ICTV is waiving these requirements in favor of phenotypes inferred from genome analysis and sequence relatedness inferred from phylogeny, homology detection and divergence metrics .
Dicistroviruses, such as ALPV and RhPV, utilize plants (in which they do not replicate) as reservoirs (‘vectors’) to infect new insect hosts in which these viruses can replicate . There is no evidence (from experiments done using RhPV) that dicistroviruses replicate in plant tissue [10, 46]. However, experiments in barley show that RhPV travels through the plant vasculature to all parts of the plant including the roots within 7 days of inoculation . On barley, R. padi individuals infected with RhPV have decreased fecundity and diminished behavioral responses to semiochemicals, most notably for methyl salicylate, a semiochemical that denotes host plant suitability for aphid colonization . It was also noted that RhPV-infected aphids were more sensitive to the aphid alarm pheromone (E)-β-farnesene . This semiochemical promotes dispersal, which translates to decreased aphid populations on plants. These authors also noted that aphids infected with RhPV were more frequently attacked by the predatory lady beetle Coccinella septempunctata, and the parasitoid wasp Aphidius ervi .
The permissiveness of plants to dicistroviruses is suggestive that plants may have evolved to enable them to benefit from the insect-lethal properties of these viruses. Aphid populations increase on common bean when the plants flower and their aggregation around flowers and developing pods causes direct feeding damage as well as virus transmission . We speculate that dicistroviruses could potentially play a natural role in protecting plants through the control of aphid populations. The payback to the dicistroviruses would likely be access to new insect hosts. This conjectured mutualistic plant-virus relationship raises the possibility that plants exploit dicistroviruses as natural biopesticides.
Is there a role for beneficial insects such as pollinators in the spread of aphid-lethal dicistroviruses? ALPV has been detected in honeybees but its presence was not associated either with colony collapse disorder or any other pathology, suggesting that bees are latent hosts [16, 49]. It has been demonstrated that the honeybee-infecting dicistrovirus Israeli acute paralysis virus can be transmitted to non-infected individuals or colonies via virus-contaminated pollen collected during foraging on flowers . Bee-infecting viruses such as Black queen cell virus, Deformed wing virus and Chronic bee paralysis virus have been detected in honeybee feces [51, 52]. Thus, one might speculate that pollinators may also disseminate aphid-lethal dicistroviruses.
Using deep sequencing we have detected the presence of strains of three dicistroviruses, ALPV, RhPV, and a novel BSRV-like dicistrovirus, in insect (A. fabae) and plant (Z. mays) samples. This is the first report of these viruses being isolated from both organisms and the first report of these viruses in East Africa. The work indicates that for these three dicistroviruses the insect host and plant reservoir ranges as well as the extent of their geographic ranges are wider than previously suspected.
We thank all the teams at BecA-ILRI Hub for technical and institutional support for the Illumina MiSeq sequencing. We would like to thank the staff of the Segolip Unit at the BecA-ILRI Hub in Nairobi for help with Sanger sequencing. We thank David Karanja, the National Bean Programme coordinator at Kenya Agricultural and Livestock Research Organization, for his help and support in accessing smallholder farms in Katumani and Kaiti. We are grateful to Mr. Moses Njiriri and Mrs. Jacinta Nthenya Muia for allowing us to collect aphid samples from their farms at Ndeiya and Oloirien in Kiambu and Kajiado counties, respectively. We thank Dr. Andrew Firth, Dr. Nina Lukhovitskaya, and Professor Sir David C. Baulcombe for useful discussions.
Work was funded by a grant from the Sustainable Crop Production Research for International Development programme funded by the UK Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) with co-funding from the UK Department for International Development, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, the Department of Biotechnology of India’s Ministry of Science and Technology, and the Indian Council of Agricultural Research (BB/J011762/1) and a Global Challenges Research Fund Foundation Award (BB/P023223/1). LAB was funded by a Cambridge BBSRC doctoral training programme studentship.
Availability of data and materials
RNAseq raw data is available at NCBI, BioProject ID: PRJNA394582.
Conceived and designed the experiments: JPC, FOW, AD and JJWH. Performed the experiments: FOW, GNM, LAB and JPC. Analysed the data: FOW, JNN, GNM and JMM. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: AD, JJWH, JMM and LAB. Wrote the manuscript: FOW and JPC. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Consent for publication
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
- Groen SC, Wamonje FO, Murphy AM, Carr JP. Engineering resistance to virus transmission. Curr Opin Virol. 2017;26:20–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Brault V, Uzest M, Monsion B, Jacquot E, Blanc S. Aphids as transport devices for plant viruses. C R Biol. 2010;333:524–38.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bonning BC, Miller WA. Dicistroviruses. Annu Rev Entomol. 2010;55:129–50.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Christian PD, Scotti PD. Biopesticides from small RNA viruses on insects: aspects of their in vitro production. In: Maramorosch K, Loeb MJ, editors. Invertebrate cell culture: looking toward the twenty first century. San Francisco: Proc. Soc. in vitro Biol; 1996. p. 73–81.Google Scholar
- Gildow FE, D’Arcy CJ. Barley and oats for an aphid virus and the influence on barley yellow dwarf virus transmission. Phytopathology. 1988;78:811–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ryabov EV, Keane G, Naish N, Evered C, Winstanley D. Densovirus induces winged morphs in asexual clones of the rosy apple aphid, Dysaphis plantaginea. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106:8465–70.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Mayo MA. Virus Taxonomy – Houston 2002. Arch Virol. 2002;147:1071–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wilson JE, Powell MJ, Hoover SE, Sarnow P. Naturally occurring dicistronic cricket paralysis virus RNA is regulated by two internal ribosome entry sites. Mol Cell Biol. 2000;20:4990–9.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Nakashima N, Uchiumi T. Functional analysis of structural motifs in dicistroviruses. Virus Res. 2009;139:137–47.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- D’Arcy CJ, Burnett PA, Hewings AD. Detection, biological effects and transmission of a virus of the aphid Rhopalosiphum padi. Virology. 1981;114:268–72.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- D’Arcy CJ, Burnett PA, Hewings AD, Goodman RM. Purification and characterization of a virus from the aphid Rhopalosiphum padi. Virology. 1981;112:346–439.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Williamson C, Rybicki EP, Kasdorf GGF, von Wechmar M. Characterization of a new picorna-like virus isolated from aphids. J Gen Virol. 1988;69:787–95.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Williamson C, Rybicki EP. A comparative study on the cell-free translation of the genomic RNAs of two aphid picorna-like viruses. Arch Virol. 1989;109:59–70.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Moon JS, Domie LL, McCoppin NK, D’Arcy CJ, Jin H, D’Arcy CJ, Jin H. Nucleotide sequence analysis shows that Rhopalosiphum padi virus is a member of a novel group of insect-infecting RNA viruses. Virology. 1998;243:54–65.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- van Munster M, Dullemans AM, Verbeek M, van den Heuvel JFJM, Clérivet A, van der Wilk F. Sequence analysis and genomic organization of Aphid lethal paralysis virus: a new member of the family Dicistroviridae. J Gen Virol. 2002;83:3131–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Runckel C, Flenniken ML, Engel JC, Ruby JG, Ganem D, Derisi JL. Temporal analysis of the honeybee microbiome reveals four novel viruses and seasonal prevalence of known viruses, Nosema, and Crithidia. PLoS One. 2011;6:e20656.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Shi C, Liu Y, Hu X, Xiong J, Zhang B. Yuan ZA Metagenomic survey of viral abundance and diversity in mosquitoes from Hubei Province. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0129845.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Feng Y, Krueger EN, Liu S, Dorman K, Bonning B, Miller AW. Discovery of known and novel viral genomes in soybean aphid by deep sequencing. Phytobiomes. 2017;1:36–45.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Favret C, Voegtlin DJ. Speciation by host-switching in pinyon Cinara (Insecta: Hemiptera: Aphididae). Molec Phylogenet Evol. 2004;32:139–51.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sanger F, Nicklen S, Coulson AR. DNA sequencing with chain-terminating inhibitors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1977;74:5463–7.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Smith LM, et al. Fluorescence detection in automated DNA sequence analysis. Nature. 1986;321:674–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cox MP, Peterson DA, Biggs PJ. SolexaQA: At-a-glance quality assessment of Illumina second-generation sequencing data. BMC Bioinf. 2010;11:485.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ban L, Didon A, Jonsson LMV, Glinwood R, Delp G. (2007) An improved detection method for the Rhopalosiphum padi virus (RhPV) allows monitoring of its presence in aphids and movement within plants, J Virol Meth. 2007;142:136–42.Google Scholar
- Edgar RC. MUSCLE: Multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004;32:1792–7.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Tamura K, et al. MEGA6: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis Version 6.0. Mol Biol Evol. 2013;30:2725–9.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Saitou N, Nei M. The neighbour-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol. 1987;4:406–25.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Muhire BM, Varsani A, Martin DP. SDT: A virus classification tool based on pairwise sequence alignment and identity calculation. PLoS One. 2014;9(9):e108277.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Martin D, Rybicki E. RDP: detection of recombination amongst aligned sequences. Bioinformatics. 2000;16:562–3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Padidam M, Sawyer S, Fauquet CM. Possible emergence of new geminiviruses by frequent recombination. Virology. 1999;265:218–25.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Smith JM. Analyzing the mosaic structure of genes. J Mol Evol. 1992;34:126–1299.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Boni MF, Posada D, Feldman MW. An exact nonparametric method for inferring mosaic structure in sequence triplets. Genetics. 2007;176:035–1047.Google Scholar
- Gibbs MJ, Armstrong JS, Gibbs AJ. Sister-scanning: a Monte-Carlo procedure for assessing signals in recombinant sequences. Bioinformatics. 2000;16:573–82.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Posada D, Crandall KA. Evaluation of methods for detecting recombination from DNA sequences: computer simulations. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001;98:13757–62.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ. Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol. 1990;215:403–10.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ho T, Tzanetakis IE. Development of a virus detection and discovery pipeline using next generation sequencing. Virology. 2014;471–473:54–60.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nakashima N, Nakamura Y. Cleavage sites of the “P3 region” in the nonstructural polyprotein precursor of a dicistrovirus. Arch Virol. 2008;153:1955–60.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Eastop VF. The periodicity of aphid flight in East Africa. East African Agriculture & Forestry Research Organisation Report. 1954;pp 305–310.Google Scholar
- Kulkarni HY. Survey of viruses affecting East African major food crops. 1972;PhD Thesis, University of Nairobi.Google Scholar
- Liu S, Vijayendran D, Carrillo-Tripp J, Miller WA, Bonning BC. Analysis of new Aphid lethal paralysis virus (ALPV) isolates suggests evolution of two ALPV species. J Gen Virol. 2014;95:2809–19.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- King AMQ, Adams MJ, Carstens EB, Lefkowitz EJ. Virus Taxonomy- Classification and Nomenclature of viruses. Ninth Report of the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses. 2012;Elsevier. ISBN: 978-0-12-384684-6.Google Scholar
- Revers F, Le Gall O, Candresse T, Romancer LM, Dunez J. Frequent occurrence of recombinant potyvirus isolates. J Gen Virol. 1996;77:1953–65.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chare ER, Holmes EC. A phylogenetic survey of recombination frequency in plant RNA viruses. Arch Virol. 2006;151:933–46.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fraile A, et al. Genetic exchange by recombination or reassortment is infrequent in natural populations of a tripartite RNA plant virus. J Virol. 1997;71:934–40.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Bruyere A, Wantroba M, Flasinski S, Bujarski JJ. Frequent homologous recombination events between molecules of one RNA component in a multipartite RNA virus. J Virol. 2000;74:4214–9.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Simmonds P, et al. Virus taxonomy in the age of metagenomics. Nature Rev Microbiol. 2017;15:161–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gildow FE, D’Arcy CJ. Cytopathology and experimental host range of Rhopalosiphum padi virus, a small isometric RNA virus infecting cereal grain aphids. J Invert Pathol. 1990;55:245–57.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ban LP, Ahmed E, Ninkovic V, Delp G, Glinwood R. Infection with an insect virus affects olfactory behaviour and interactions with host plant and natural enemies in an aphid. Entomol Exper Applic. 2008;127:108–17.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Worrall EA, Wamonje FO, Mukeshimana G, Harvey JJW, Carr JP, Mitter N. Bean common mosaic virus and Bean common mosaic necrosis virus: relationships, biology, and prospects for control. Adv Virus Res. 2015;93:1–46.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- McMenamin AJ, Genersch E. Honeybee colony losses and associated viruses. Curr Opin Insect Sci. 2015;8:121–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Singh R, et al. RNA viruses in hymenopteran pollinators: Evidence of inter-taxa virus transmission via pollen and potential impact on non-Apis hymenopteran species. PLoS One. 2010;5:e14357.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Chen Y, Pettis J, Collins A, Feldlaufer MF. Prevalence and transmission of honeybee viruses. Appl Env Micro. 2006;72:606–11.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ribière M, Lallemand P, Iscache AL, Schurr F, Celle O, Blanchard P, Olivier V, Faucon JP. Spread of infectious chronic bee paralysis virus by honeybee (Apis mellifera L.) feces. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2007;73:7711–6.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Dombrovsky A, Luria N. The Nerium oleander aphid Aphis nerii is tolerant to a local isolate of Aphid lethal paralysis virus (ALPV). Virus Genes. 2013;46:354–61.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ge X, et al. Metagenomic analysis of viruses from bat fecal samples reveals many novel viruses in insectivorous bats in China. J Virol. 2012;86:4620–30.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Granberg F, et al. Metagenomic detection of viral pathogens in Spanish honeybees: co-Infection by aphid lethal paralysis, Israel acute paralysis and Lake Sinai viruses. PLoS One. 2013;8(2):e57459.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Maina S, Edwards OR, de Almeida L, Ximenes A, Jones RAC. Metagenomic analysis of cucumber RNA from East Timor reveals an Aphid lethal paralysis virus genome. Genome Announc. 2017;5(2):e01445–16.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Valles SM, et al. ICTV Virus Taxonomy Profile: Dicistroviridae. J Gen Virol. 2017;98:355–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar