Skip to main content
Download PDF

Downregulation of microRNA-30a-5p contributes to the replication of duck enteritis virus by regulating Beclin-1-mediated autophagy

Virology Journal volume 16, Article number: 144 (2019) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) is increasingly recognized as an important element in regulating virus-host interactions. Our previous results showed that cellular miR-30a-5p was significantly downregulated after duck enteritis virus (DEV) infection cell. However, whehter or not the miR-30a-5p is involved in DEV infection has not been known.

Methods

Quantitative reverse-transcription PCR (qRT-PCR) was used to measure the expression levels of miRNAs(miR-30a-5p) and Beclin-1 mRNA. The miR-30a-5p - Beclin-1 target interactions were determined by Dual luciferase reporter assay (DLRA). Western blotting was utilized to analyze Beclin-1-mediated duck embryo fibroblast (DEF) cells autophagy activity. DEV titers were estimated by the median tissue culture infective dose (TCID50).

Results

The miR-30a-5p was significantly downregulated and the Beclin-1 mRNA was significantly upregulated in DEV-infected DEF cells. DLRA confirmed that miR-30a-5p directly targeted the 3′- UTR of the Beclin-1 gene. Overexpression of miR-30a-5p significantly reduced the expression level of Beclin-1protein (p < 0.05), leading to the decrease of Beclin-1-mediated autophagy activity, which ultimately suppressed DEV replication (P < 0.05). Whereas transfection of miR-30a-5p inhibitor increased Beclin-1-mediated autophagy and triggered DEV replication during the whole process of DEV infection (P < 0.01).

Conclusions

This study shows that miR-30a-5p can inhibit DEV replication through reducing autophagy by targeting Beclin-1. These findings suggest a new insight into virus-host interaction during DEV infection and provide a potential new antiviral therapeutic strategy against DEV infection.

Background

Duck enteritis virus (DEV) is the causative pathogen of duck viral enteritis disease, causing considerable economic losses in the duck industry due to high mortality and low egg production [1, 2]. In addition, DEV can cause variable morbidity and mortality in geese, swans and other wild waterfowl and poses a severe threat to waterfowl groups [3,4,5]. DEV is classified into the family Herpesviridae, subfamily Alphaherpesvirinae, genus Mardivirus and anatid herpesvirus I [6]. Its genome is a linear double-stranded DNA molecule that is composed of a unique long region (UL) and a unique short region (US) flanked by a short internal repeat sequence (IRS) and a short terminal repeat sequence (TRS) [7,8,9,10].

Autophagy is an essential self-digestion process that degrades protein and waste in cells to maintain cellular metabolic balance and homeostasis [11, 12]. Growing evidence has shown that viral infection can induce cellular autophagy. For example, some viruses, such as Newcastle disease virus (NDV) [13], classical swine fever virus (CSFV) [14], porcine circovirus type 2 (PCV2) [15], porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) [16], dengue virus, foot-and-mouth disease virus (FMDV) and varicella-zoster virus (VZV) [17], can induce cell autophagy to enhance their replication. However, autophagy can suppress viral replication and eliminate viral infection [18, 19]. For example, cellular autophagy can inhibit replication of vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV) by regulating the P13K/AKT signaling pathway [20]. Recent research has reported that DEV induces autophagy to enhance its replication in duck embryo fibroblast (DEF) cells [21]. Nevertheless, the regulatory relationship of autophagy remains poorly understand.

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are important small (18–24 nt), noncoding, endogenous RNAs that can negatively regulate gene expression by binding fully or partially to the 3′-untranslated region (3′-UTR) [22, 23]. Accumulating evidence has demonstrated that miRNAs participate in a wide range of biological processes, including cellular proliferation, differentiation, signal transduction, metabolism apoptosis and cellular autophagy [24,25,26,27], and play important roles in regulating virus-host interactions [28,29,30]. Our previous high-throughput sequencing results revealed that 13 cellular miRNAs (mir-125-2-3p, mir-124a-3p, mir-215-5p, mir-29b-3p, etc) were significantly upregulated and 25 miRNAs (mir-1a-3p, mir-133a-5p, miR-30a-5p, miR-16c-5p, etc) were significantly downregulated after CHv infection [31]. Therefore, we speculate that these miRNAs may play crucial roles in DEV infection.

In this study, we first confirmed that miR-30a-5p directly targeted the 3′-UTR of the Beclin-1 mRNA. Further study showed that overexpression of miR-30a-5p inhibited DEV replication by downregulating Beclin-1-mediated autophagy in DEF cells. miR-30a-5p inhibitor triggered DEV replication, suggesting that miR-30a-5p palys important roles in the regulation of DEV-induced autophagy and viral proliferation. These data provide a basis for further understanding miRNAs’ regulatory roles in cellular autophagy and should contribute to the development of anti-DEV drugs.

Methods

Virus, cells, miRNA mimic and antibodies

The DEV CHv (Chinese virulent strain) (accession No. JQ647509) and mouse anti-UL41 serum were provided by the Avian Diseases Research Center, College of Veterinary Medicine, Sichuan Agricultural University. Duck embryo fibroblast (DEF) cultures were prepared from 10-day-old duck embryos for the propagation of CHv. The study was approved by the Animal Ethics Committee of Sichuan Agricultural University (approval No. XF2016–17). Cell monolayers were cultured in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium (DMEM, Gibco, Grand Island, NY USA) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS, Gibco, USA) and 1% penicillin-streptomycin (Gibco, USA) at 37 °C in a 5% CO2 atmosphere. The miR-30a-5p mimic, mimic negative-control (mimic-NC), miR-30a-5p inhibitor and inhibitor-NC were synthesized by Ribobio (Guangzhou, China) and transfected into cells at a final concentration of 100 nM.

Quantitative real-time RT-PCR

Stem-loop qRT-PCR and general qRT-PCR methods were used to measure the expression levels of miRNAs and Beclin-1 mRNA, respectively. Total RNA from DEV-infected and uninfected DEF cells was extracted with TRIzol reagent (TIANGEN Biotech, Beijing) and quantified using a spectrophotometer (NanoDrop 2000). RNA (1000 ng) was reverse-transcribed to cDNA, and then 2 μl cDNA was used for real-time PCR amplification according to the kit manufacturer’s (Thermo) instructions. The primers are listed in Table 1. Relative expression levels of miRNA and Beclin-1 mRNA were calculated using the 2-ΔΔCt method. U6 and β-actin were used as respective endogenous controls.

Table 1 Primers for analysis of gene expression by qRT-PCR
Full size table

Vector constructs and luciferase assay

MiR-30a-5p was predicted to target the DEF Beclin-1 3’UTR (nt 136,000-145,890) according to RNAhybrid and PITA software. The Beclin-1 3’UTR (nt 136,085-136,248), including the predicted miR-30a-5p binding site, was synthesized by TsingKe (Chengdu, China) and cloned into a pmirGLO vector (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) with SacI and XhoI sites, resulting in pmirGLO-WT-Beclin-1. Accordingly, the mutant 3’UTR of the Beclin-1 vector was constructed and named pmirGLO-MU-Beclin-1. For the luciferase assay, COS7 cells were seeded in 96-well plates and cotransfected with miR-30a-5p mimic, miR-NC, pmirGLO-WT-Beclin-1 and pmirGLO-MU-Beclin-1 with Lipofectamine 3000 (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). We performed a site-directed DLRA, and luciferase activity was measured at 36 h posttransfection according to the manufacturer’s protocol (Promega, Madison, WI, USA).

Western blot analysis

The synthetic miR-30a-5p mimic, miR-NC, miR-30a-5p inhibitor and inhibitor-NC were transfected into DEF cells with Lipofectamine 3000 (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Meanwhile, the blank group (without) was set as the control group. Cells were infected with DEV at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 1.0 for 36 h. The cells were harvested and washed 3 times with cold PBS. The PBS was decanted and then 150 μl RIPA lysis buffer (Solarbio, China) and 1.0 mM PSMF were added. After 30 min on ice and centrifugation at 12,000 g for 10 min, 25 μl supernatant was mixed with 25 μl 5 × SDS loading buffer and boiled for 10 min. The protein samples were analyzed by 12% SDS polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and transferred to a polyvinylidene difluorride (PVDF) membranes (Millipore, Billerica, MA) by electroelution. Membranes were blocked with 5% milk-TBS-Tween-20 for 2 h at room temperature and incubated with rabbit anti-LC3 (Proteintech, 14,600–1-AP), rabbit anti-p62/SQSTM1 (Cell Signaling Technology, 5114), mouse anti-β-actin (Proteintech, 60,008–1-Ig), rabbit anti-Beclin-1 (Proteintech, 11,306–1-AP) and anti-CHv (UL41) antibodies overnight at 4 °C. Following incubation with HRP-conjugated goat anti-rabbit or anti-mouse IgG (Biodragon-Immunotech, China) as secondary antibody for 2 h at 37 °C, the immunoreactive bands were detected using an enhanced chemiluminescence kit (Solarbio, China). The amount of proteins was quantified by densitometry and normalized to β-actin, an internal standard.

Flow cytometry assay

DEF cells were seed in a 6-well plate at adensity of 1 × 106 cells per well. Cells were pretreated with control (without), miR-30a-5p mimic, miR-NC, miR-30a-5p inhibitor and inhibitor-NC for 4 h and then infected with DEV (MOI = 1.0) for 36 h. The cells were stained with Annexin V-fluorescein isothiocyanate (V-FITC) (BD Pharmingen, USA) and propidium iodide (PI) (BD Pharmingen, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions, and the percentage of apoptotic cells was assayed by flow cytometry (FCM).

Cell viability analysis

miRNA toxicity tests were performed using the MTT assay kit (Sangon Biotech, Shanghai, China) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. In brief, DEF cells were seeded in 96-well culture plates at a density of 1 × 105 cells per well. Cells were pretreated with control, miR-30a-5p mimic, miR-NC, miR-30a-5p inhibitor and inhibitor-NC for 4 h and then cultured in DMEM for 36 h, the cells were incubated in 100 μl fresh culture medium containing MTT (0.5 mg mL− 1) for 4 h at 37 °C. The medium was replaced by 100 μl formazan solubilization solution, and the absorbance was measured at 570 nm using a microplate reader (Bio-Rad).

DEV replication analysis

DEV viral copies were detected using qRT-PCR methods. DEF cells were seed in a 6-well plate at adensity of 1 × 106 cells per well. Cells were pretreated with control, miR-30a-5p mimic, miR-NC, miR-30a-5p inhibitor and inhibitor-NC for 4 h and then infected with DEV (MOI = 1.0). The cells were collected at the indicated times and stored at − 80 °C for subsequent experiments. The DEV absolute quantitative curve was created as previously described methods [32, 33].

DEV titers were estimated by the median tissue culture infective dose (TCID50). DEF cells were seed in 96-well plates at adensity of 1 × 105 cells per well. Cells were pretreated with control, miR-30a-5p mimic, miR-NC, miR-30a-5p inhibitor and inhibitor-NC for 4 h and then infected with DEV collected at the indicated times above. The plates were incubated for 5 days at 37 °C in a 5% CO2 atmosphere. Cell pathological changes were observed under a light microscope and recorded. Viral titers were measured according to the Reed-Muench method [34].

Statistical analysis

Each assay was performed in three independent experiments. All experimental results are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation (mean ± SD) and were analyzed by the software GraphPad Prism (version 7.0). The statistical significance was assessed using Student’s t-test. *p < 0.05 and **p < 0.01 indicate significance.

Results

DEV infection induces downregulation of miR-30a-5p and promotes Beclin-1 mRNA expression

According to our previous high-throughput sequencing results [31], six miRNAs were chosen and detected using the stem-loop qRT-PCR method. The results showed that the expression levels of miR-30a-5p and miR-16c-5p were significantly downregulated in DEV-infected DEF cells at 24 hpi (P < 0.01) (Fig. 1a), and there were no obvious changes in the remaining four miRNAs (miR-146b-5p, miR-27b-3p, miR-130b-3p and miR-125b-5p) compared with uninfected cells (Fig. 1a). We detected the expression levels of miR-30a-5p and miR-16c-5p at 4, 12, 24, 36 and 48 hpi in DEV-infected group and uninfected group respectively. We found that the expression levels of mir-30a-5p and mir-16c-5p in the uninfected group were 2.5 and 2.2 times as high as those in the infected group at 36 hpi respectively (Fig. 1b, c). In addition, qRT-PCR results showed that the expression level of Beclin-1 was upregulated in DEV-infected DEF cells and was 2.1- and 2.4-fold higher compared with the uninfected group at 36 hpi and 48 hpi (Fig. 1d).

Fig. 1
figure1

Expression levels of miRNAs and Beclin-1 mRNA after DEV infection of DEF cells. a Expression levels of 6 DEF-encoded miRNAs were detected using stem-loop qRT-PCR at 36 hpi. b Expression of miR-30a-5p was measured by stem-loop qRT-PCR at the indicated time points. U6 was used as an endogenous control. c Expression of miR-16c-5p was measured by stem-loop qRT-PCR at the indicated time points. U6 was used as an endogenous control. d Expression of Beclin-1 mRNA was measured by qRT-PCR at the indicated time points. β-Actin was used as an endogenous control. The data are presented as the mean ± SD for three independent experiments. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01

Full size image

Beclin-1 is a target of miR-30a-5p in DEF cells

A DLRA showed that pmirGLO-WT-Beclin-1 was significantly repressed by miR-30a-5p compared to the mimic-NC group (p < 0.01) (Fig. 2a, b). To further explore whether the downregulation of targets by miR-30a-5p was binding site-dependent, the binding sites of Beclin-1 were mutated to make the construct pmirGLO-MU-Beclin-1 vector (Fig. 2a). As expected, miR-30a-5p lost its repression effect on the mutant vector pmirGLO-MU-Beclin-1 (Fig. 2b). These results indicated that miR-30a-5p can directly target the DEF Beclin-1 mRNA at a 8-nucleotide complementary seed sequence.

Fig. 2
figure2

Luciferase reporter assay for the interaction between miR-30a-5p and Beclin-1 mRNA. a The seed sequence of miR-30a-5p and its target site in the 3’UTR of Beclin-1 mRNA are shown in red, and eight nucleotides were mutated in the 3’UTR of Beclin-1 mRNA (underlined). b Activity of the luciferase gene linked to the 3’UTR of Beclin-1 mRNA. Wild-type pmirGLO-WT-Beclin-1 (WT-Beclin-1) or mutant pmirGLO-MU-Beclin-1 (MU-Beclin-1) was transfected into COS7 cells with the miR-30a-5p mimic or the negative control (miR-NC). Luciferase activity was measured after 36 h. c DEF cells were pretreated with control (without), mimic-NC, miR-30a-5p mimic, inhibitor-NC and miR-30a-5p inhibitor for 4 h and then infected with DEV for 36 h. The expression level of miR-30a-5p was assessed by qRT-PCR. d DEF cells were pretreated with control (without), mimic-NC, miR-30a-5p mimic, inhibitor-NC and miR-30a-5p inhibitor for 4 h and then infected with DEV for 36 h. The expression level of Beclin-1 was assessed by qRT-PCR. The data are presented as the mean ± SD for three independent experiments. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01, compared with the control group (miR-30a-5p + WT-Beclin-1)

Full size image

miR-30a-5p suppresses Beclin-1 expression and autophagy is induced by DEV

To further explore whether therer is the negative regulation relationship between miR-30a-5p and Beclin-1 in DEV-infected DEF cells, DEF cells were transfected with control, miR-30a-5p mimic, miR-NC, miR-30a-5p inhibitor and inhibitor-NC for 4 h and then infected with DEV (MOI = 1.0) for 36 h. The mRNA expression levels of miR-30a-5p and Beclin-1 were evaluated by qRT-PCR. As expected, Transfection of the miR-30a-5p mimic significantly increased the miR-30a-5p expression and decreased the mRNA level of Beclin-1. Consistently, miR-30a-5p inhibitor had the opposite effects on expression in miR-30a-5p and Beclin-1 (P < 0.01) (Fig. 2c, d).

Next, we observed the effect of miR-30a-5p on autophagy. Western blot analysis showed that miR-30a-5p overexpression significantly decreased Beclin-1 protein expression. The ratio of of LC3-II/LC3-I was significantly downregulated and the p62 protein level was significantly upregulated in the miR-30a-5p group, suggesting that autophagy was inhibited by miR-30a-5p regulating Beclin-1 (Fig. 3a, b). While the miR-30a-5p inhibitor increased Beclin-1 protein level and decreased p62 expression. An increaed ratio of LC3-II/LC3-I was observed for miR-30a-5p inhibitor-treated group compared to inhibitor-NC group, indicating that autophagy activity was promoted (Fig. 3c, d). Specific viral proteins with UL41 antibody indicated the process of viral infection. These results revealed that the miR-30a-5p inhibited autophagy by regulating Beclin-1in DEV-infected cells.

Fig. 3
figure3

miR-30a-5p overexpression suppresses Beclin-1 expression and DEV-induced autophagy. a DEF cells were pretreated with control (without), mimic-NC and miR-30a-5p mimic for 4 h and then infected with DEV. Cells were lysed and blotted with antibodies against Beclin-1, p62, LC3, β-actin and UL41 at 36 hpi. b The optical densities of each protein band from (a) were measured by densitometric scanning, and the optical density ratios of Beclin-1/β-actin, P62/β-actin LC3II/I, and UL41/β-actin were calculated. c DEF cells were pretreated with control (without), inhibitor-NC and miR-30a-5p inhibitor for 4 h and then infected with DEV. Cells were lysed and blotted with antibodies against Beclin-1, p62, LC3, β-actin and UL41 at 36 hpi. d The optical densities of each protein band from (c) were measured by densitometric scanning, and the optical density ratios of Beclin-1/β-actin, P62/β-actin LC3II/I, and UL41/β-actin were calculated. The data are presented as the mean ± SD for three independent experiments. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01, compared with the control group

Full size image

miR-30a-5p promotes DEV-induced DEF cell apoptosis

A FCM was used to detect DEV-induced DEF cell apoptosis after transfecting control, miR-30a-5p mimic, miR-NC, miR-30a-5p inhibitor and inhibitor-NC. The results revealed that the percentage of apoptotic DEF cells was significantly increased at 36 hpi in the miR-30a-5p mimic group. However, the transfection of miR-30a-5p inhibitor significantly decreased the percentage of apoptotic cells in DEV-infected cells (Fig. 4a). These results showed that miR-30a-5p promoted DEV-induced apoptosis of DEF cells.

Fig. 4
figure4

miR-30a-5p overexpression reduces DEV replication in DEF cells. a DEF cells were pretreated with control (without), mimic-NC, miR-30a-5p mimic, inhibitor-NC and miR-30a-5p inhibitor for 4 h and then infected with DEV for 36 h. Apoptosis was analyzed by Annexin V-FITC/PI staining using flow cytometry. b Changes in DEF viability following treatment with control (without), mimic-NC, miR-30a-5p mimic, inhibitor-NC and miR-30a-5p inhibitor for 4 h and then cultured in DMEM at 37 °C. The cell viability were tested by MTT assay kit at 36 h. c DEF cells were pretreated with control (without), mimic-NC, miR-30a-5p mimic, inhibitor-NC and miR-30a-5p inhibitor for 4 h and then infected with DEV. Viral copies were determined at the indicated time points. d DEF cells were pretreated with control (without), mimic-NC, miR-30a-5p mimic, inhibitor-NC and miR-30a-5p inhibitor for 4 h and then infected with DEV, and viral yields (TCID50 per 0.1 ml) were determined at the indicated time points. The data are presented as the mean ± SD for three independent experiments. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01, compared with the control group. “ # ” indicates no significant difference, P > 0.05

Full size image

Cell viability unaffected by miRNAs treatment

The miRNAs might have influenced cell viability and affected our results. The effects on cell viability of the miRNAs used in this study were measured by MTT assays. The viability of treated cells was almost equal to that of control cells, so the miRNAs treatments did not affect DEF cell viability (Fig. 4b).

miR-30a-5p overexpression reduces DEV replication

To identify the potential function of miR-30a-5p in the viral replication process, DEF cells were transfected with control, miR-30a-5p mimic, miR-NC, miR-30a-5p inhibitor and inhibitor-NC for 4 h and then infected with DEV (MOI = 1.0). The genome copy number of DEV was measured by qRT-PCR at the indicated time points, and overexpression of miR-30a-5p strongly suppressed DEV replication at 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 hpi, while the miR-30a-5p inhibitor significantly triggered DEV replication at the same time points (Fig. 4c).

Viral yields were determined by TCID50 at the indicated time points, and titers of progeny viruses collected from miR-30a-5p mimic group were lower than from control cells at 24, 36, 48 and 60 hpi. While viral titers in miR-30a-5p inhibitor group were significantly upregulated compared with the control group (Fig. 4d).

Discussion

There have been several reports about miR-30a-5p target genes and their involvement in pathophysiological processes. For example, miR-30a-5p promotes the replication of porcine circovirus type 2 through enhancing autophagy by targeting 14–3-3 [15]. MiR-30a-5p downregulation contributes to the chemoresistance of osteosarcoma cells by activating Beclin-1-mediated autophagy [35]. The expression of miR-30a-5p is significantly downregulated in human colorectal cancer (CRC) tissues and CRC cell lines and may be a potential candidate target for CRC therapy [36]. Low expression of miR-30a-5p induces the proliferation and invasion of oral cancer by promoting the expression of FAP (Homo sapiens fibroblast activation protein α), and miR-30a-5p might be a new therapeutic target for oral cancer treatment [37]. In our previous study, miRNA expression profiles of virus and host were determined and analyzed in virulent DEV-infected DEF cells. The expression level of miRNA-30a-5p was significantly downregulated during the whole process of DEV infection [31], and similar results were confirmed by stem-loop qRT-PCR in this study (Fig. 1b). We speculate that miR-30a-5p plays an important role in regulating host-virus interactions.

Autophagy is an essential pathway for cellular homeostasis. Many studies have confirmed that some viruses can induce cells manipulate autophagy to promote their survival and replication [38, 39]. Examples include hepatitis C virus [40], egg drop syndrome virus (EDSV) [41], avian reovirus [42] and influenza A virus [43]. Rrecent study demonstrated that autophagy induced by DEV infection positively promotes viral replication [21]. However, the regulating relationship of autophagy in DEV-infected DEF cells is still unclear. In this study, our data showed that the expression of miR-30a-5p was downregulated and that Beclin-1 was upregulated after CHv infection of DEF cells. The Beclin-1 gene is recognized as a critical regulatory gene during autophagosome formation and maturation [44] and plays important roles in the replication of some viruses. For example, the replication of these three viruses (NDV, CSFV and DEV) was inhibited by siRNA knockdown of Beclin-1 gene level, which is required for autophagy [13, 14, 21]. Previous studies have demonstrated that miR-30a-5p regulates autophagy activity by targeting Beclin-1 mRNA [45,46,47]. Therefore, we speculated that there is the negative regulation relationship between Beclin-1 and endogenous miR-30a-5p in DEV-infected DEF cells. To confirm the regulation of miR-30a-5p on Beclin-1, bioinformatics analysis was performed using RNAhybrid software [31]. The results showed that miR-30a-5p was predicted to target the 3′-UTR region of Beclin-1. DLRA confirmed that overexpression of miR-30a-5p markedly reduced the luciferase level from Beclin-1 (Fig. 2a, b).

Western blot analysis demonstrated that overexpression of miR-30a-5p decreased decreased Beclin-1 protein level and the ratio of of LC3-II/LC3-I, enhanced the p62 protein level, which are related to autophagy. The expression of UL41 protein decreased (Fig. 3a, b). Whereas miR-30a-5p inhibitor attenuated DEV-induced cell autophagy and reversed the effect of miR-30a-5p. Both Beclin-1 and the ratio of LC3-II/LC3-I significantly increased in miR-30a-5p inhibitor group. The p62 protein level decreased and the expression of UL41 protein increased (Fig. 3c, d). The TCID50 and the viral copy test confirmed that DEV titers were significantly decreased in the miR-30a-5p mimic group compared with control group. Whereas transfection of miR-30a-5p inhibitor promoted DEV replication during the whole process of DEV infection (Fig. 4c and d). Our results were consistent with a previous report on autophagy induced by DEV [21], suggesting a key role for the miR-30a-5p/autophagy loop in DEV infection. These results strongly suggested that overexpression of miR-30a-5p decreased DEV replication by suppressing Beclin-1-mediated autophagy. Therefore, it is reasonable to conclude that downregulation of miR-30a-5p contributes to DEV replication by upregulating Beclin-1-mediated autophagy.

Apoptosis regulates embryonic development, cell turnover, and the immune response against tumor or virus-infected cells [48, 49]. Virus-induced cell apoptosis is involved in the pathogenesis of many viral infections [50, 51]. Our laboratory has discovered that DEV can induce apoptosis in the thymus, spleen and pancreatic lymphocytes of adult ducks and can cause apoptosis in DEFs in vitro [52, 53], and further confirmed that the mRNA levels and enzymatic activities of caspase-3, caspase-7 and caspase-9 were significantly increased during DEV-induced cell apoptosis [53]. Recent study has also reported miR-30a-5p can promote doxorubicin-induced osteosarcoma cell apoptosis by increasing the expression of cleaved caspase-3, and further certified that miR-30a-5p promotes chemotherapy-induced osteosarcoma cell apoptosis via repressing Beclin-1-mediated osteosarcoma autophagy [35]. In our study, flow cytometry demonstrated that overexpression of miR-30a-5p enhanced DEV-induced cell apoptosis (Fig. 4a). Nevertheless, miR-30a-5p inhibitor attenuated DEV-induced cell apoptosis and reversed the effect of miR-30a-5p (Fig. 4a). However, whehter or not the miR-30a-5p increased DEV-induced cell apoptosis by suppressing Beclin-1-mediated autophagy requires further confirmation.

Conclusions

The results of this study showed that the miR-30a-5p/autophagy loop plays an important role in DEV infection, and this is the first report of miR-30a-5p in herpesvirus-induced autophagy. Our work confirms the existence of a novel regulatory pathway controlled by miR-30a-5p and its direct target, Beclin-1, that regulates DEV replication in DEFs. Therefore, miR-30a-5p and its target gene pathway may represent new treatment methods for duck viral enteritis disease.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used or analysed during this study are included within the article.

Abbreviations

CHv:

Chinese virulent

CSFV:

Classical swine fever virus

DEV:

Duck enteritis virus

EDSV:

Egg drop syndrome virus

IRS:

Inverted repeated sequences

NDV:

Newcastle disease virus

PCV2:

Porcine circovirus type 2

PRRSV:

Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus

qRT-PCR:

Quantitative real-time reverse transcriotion PCR

TRS:

terminal repeated sequences

UL:

Unique long region

US:

Unique short region

VZV:

Varicella-zoster virus

References

  1. 1.

    Wang G, Qu Y, Wang F, Hu D, Liu L, Li N, et al. The comprehensive diagnosis and prevention of duck plague in Northwest Shandong province of China. Poult Sci. 2013;92(11):2892–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Dhama K, Kumar N, Saminathan M, Tiwari R, Karthik K, Kumar MA, et al. Duck virus enteritis (duck plague) - a comprehensive update. Vet Q. 2017;37(1):57.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Kaleta EF, Kuczka A, Kühnhold A, Bunzenthal C, Bönner BM, Hanka K, et al. Outbreak of duck plague (duck herpesvirus enteritis) in numerous species of captive ducks and geese in temporal conjunction with enforced biosecurity (in-house keeping) due to the threat of avian influenza a virus of the subtype Asia H5N1. Dtw Deutsche Tierärztliche Wochenschrift. 2007;114(1):3–11.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Keymer IF, Gough RE. Duck virus enteritis (anatid herpesvirus infection) in mute swans (Cygnus Olor). Avian Pathology. 1986;15(1):161–70.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Metwally SA SD, Glisson JR, McDougald LR, Nolan, LK, Suarez DL, Nair V,. Duck Virus Enteritis (Duck Plague)[M]. In: Diseases of Poultry, 13th Edition 2013:431–40.

  6. 6.

    King AMQ. Virus taxonomy: classification and nomenclature of viruses : ninth report of the international committee on taxonomy of viruses: Elsevier/academic press; 2012.

  7. 7.

    Li Y, Huang B, Ma X, Wu J, Li F, Ai W, et al. Molecular characterization of the genome of duck enteritis virus. Virology. 2009;391(2):151–61.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Wang J, Höper D, Beer M, Osterrieder N. Complete genome sequence of virulent duck enteritis virus (DEV) strain 2085 and comparison with genome sequences of virulent and attenuated DEV strains. Virus Res. 2011;160(1):316–25.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Wu Y, Cheng A, Wang M, Yang Q, Zhu D, Jia R, et al. Complete genomic sequence of Chinese virulent duck enteritis virus. J Virol. 2012;86(10):5965.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Wu Y, Cheng A, Wang M, Zhu D, Jia R, Chen S, et al. Comparative genomic analysis of duck enteritis virus strains. J Virol. 2012;86(24):13841–2.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Reggiori F. 1. Membrane origin for autophagy. Curr Top Dev Biol. 2006;74:1.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Levine B, Klionsky DJ. Development by self-digestion: molecular mechanisms and biological functions of autophagy. Dev Cell. 2004;6(4):463.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Sun Y, Yu S, Ding N, Meng C, Meng S, Zhang S, et al. Autophagy benefits the replication of Newcastle disease virus in chicken cells and tissues. J Virol. 2014;88(1):525.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Pei J, Zhao M, Ye Z, Gou H, Wang J, Yi L, et al. Autophagy enhances the replication of classical swine fever virus in vitro. Autophagy. 2014;10(1):93–110.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Wang X, Xu X, Wang W, Yu Z, Wen L, He K, et al. MicroRNA-30a-5p promotes replication of porcine circovirus type 2 through enhancing autophagy by targeting 14-3-3. Arch Virol. 2017;22:1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Chen Q, Fang L, Wang D, Wang S, Li P, Li M, et al. Induction of autophagy enhances porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus replication. Virus Res. 2012;163(2):650–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Buckingham EM, Carpenter JE, Jackson W, Zerboni L, Arvin AM, Grose C. Autophagic flux without a block differentiates varicella-zoster virus infection from herpes simplex virus infection. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015;112(1):256–61.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Gutierrez MG, Master SS, Singh SB, Taylor GA, Colombo MI, Deretic V. Autophagy is a defense mechanism inhibiting BCG and mycobacterium tuberculosis survival in infected macrophages. Cell. 2004;119(6):753–66.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Schmid D, Münz C. Innate and adaptive immunity through autophagy. Immunity. 2007;27(1):11–21.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Shelly S, Lukinova N, Bambina S, Berman A, Cherry S. Autophagy is an essential component of Drosophila immunity against vesicular stomatitis virus. Immunity. 2009;30(4):588–98.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Yin H-C, Zhao L-L, Li S-Q, Niu Y-J, Jiang X-J, Xu L-J, et al. Autophagy activated by duck enteritis virus infection positively affects its replication. J Gen Virol. 2017;98(3):486–95.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Bartel DP. MicroRNAs: target recognition and regulatory functions. Cell. 2009;136(2):215.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Fasanaro P, Greco S, Ivan M, Capogrossi MC, Martelli F. microRNA: emerging therapeutic targets in acute ischemic diseases. Pharmacol Ther. 2010;125(1):92–104.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Cullen BR. Viral and cellular messenger RNA targets of viral microRNAs. Nature. 2009;457(7228):421–5.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Huang Y, Shen XJ, Zou Q, Wang SP, Tang SM, Zhang GZ. Biological functions of microRNAs: a review. J Physiol Biochem. 2011;67(1):129–39.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Abeliovich H. Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy: Haematologica; 2012. 151–75 p.

  27. 27.

    Fu LL, Wen X, Bao JK, Liu B. MicroRNA-modulated autophagic signaling networks in cancer. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2012;44(5):733.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Yao Y, Smith LP, Nair V, Watson M. An avian retrovirus uses canonical expression and processing mechanisms to generate viral microRNA. J Virol. 2014;88(1):2–9.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Grey F. Role of microRNAs in herpesvirus latency and persistence. J Gen Virol. 2015;96(4):739–51.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Frappier L. Regulation of herpesvirus reactivation by host microRNAs. J Virol. 2015;89(5):2456.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Zhou H, Chen S, Zhou Q, Wei Y, Wang M, Jia R, et al. Cross-species antiviral activity of goose Interferons against duck plague virus is related to its positive self-feedback regulation and subsequent interferon stimulated genes induction. Viruses. 2016;8(7):195.

    PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Chen S, Zhang W, Zhou Q, Wang A, Sun L, Wang M, et al. Cross-species antiviral activity of goose interferon lambda against duck plague virus is related to its positive self-regulatory feedback loop. J Gen Virol. 2017;98(6):1455–66.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Reed LJ, Muench H. A simple method of estimating fifty per cent endpoints. Am J Epidemiol. 1938;27(3):493–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Wu X, Jia R, Zhou J, Wang M, Chen S, Liu M, et al. Virulent duck enteritis virus infected DEF cells generate a unique pattern of viral microRNAs and a novel set of host microRNAs. BMC Vet Res. 2018;14(1):144.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Xu R, Liu S, Chen H, Lao L. MicroRNA-30a downregulation contributes to chemoresistance of osteosarcoma cells through activating Beclin-1-mediated autophagy. Oncol Rep. 2016;35(3):1757.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Park YR, Kim SL, Lee MR, Seo SY, Lee JH, Kim SH, et al. MicroRNA-30a-5p (miR-30a) regulates cell motility and EMT by directly targeting oncogenic TM4SF1 in colorectal cancer. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2017;143(11):1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Ruan P, Tan A, Tao Z. Low expression of miR-30a-5p induced the proliferation and invasion of oral cancer via promoting the expression of FAP. Biosci Rep. 2018;38(1):BSR20171027.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Kim HJ, Lee S, Jung JU. When autophagy meets viruses: a double-edged sword with functions in defense and offense. Semin Immunopathol. 2010;32(4):323–41.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Jain B, Chaturvedi UC, Jain A. Role of intracellular events in the pathogenesis of dengue; an overview. Microb Pathog. 2014;69–70(1):45–52.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Wileman T. Aggresomes and autophagy generate sites for virus replication. Science. 2006;312(5775):875–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Wang X, Qi X, Yang B, Chen S, Wang J. Autophagy benefits the replication of egg drop syndrome virus in duck embryo fibroblasts. Front Microbiol. 2018;9.

  42. 42.

    Meng S, Jiang K, Zhang X, Zhang M, Zhou Z, Hu M, et al. Avian reovirus triggers autophagy in primary chicken fibroblast cells and Vero cells to promote virus production. Arch Virol. 2012;157(4):661–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Zhou Z, Jiang X, Liu D, Fan Z, Hu X, Yan J, et al. Autophagy is involved in influenza a virus replication. Autophagy. 2009;5(3):321–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Pattingre S, Tassa A, Qu X, Garuti R, Liang XH, Mizushima N, et al. Bcl-2 antiapoptotic proteins inhibit Beclin 1-dependent autophagy. Cell. 2005;122(6):927–39.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Zhu H, Wu H, Liu X, Li B, Chen Y, Ren X, et al. Regulation of autophagy by a beclin 1-targeted microRNA, miR-30a, in cancer cells. Autophagy. 2009;5(6):816–23.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Wang P, Liang J, Li Y, Li J, Yang X, Zhang X, et al. Down-regulation of miRNA-30a alleviates cerebral ischemic injury through enhancing beclin 1-mediated autophagy. Neurochem Res. 2014;39(7):1279–91.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Pan W, Zhong Y, Cheng C, Liu B, Wang L, Li A, et al. MiR-30-regulated autophagy mediates angiotensin II-induced myocardial hypertrophy. PLoS One. 2013;8(1):e53950.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Cao J, Ou X, Zhu D, Ma G, Cheng A, Wang M, et al. The 2A2 protein of duck hepatitis a virus type 1 induces apoptosis in primary cell culture. Virus Genes. 2016;52(6):1–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Sheng XD, Zhang WP, Zhang QR, Gu CQ, Hu XY, Cheng GF. Apoptosis induction in duck tissues during duck hepatitis a virus type 1 infection. Poult Sci. 2014;93(3):527–34.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Zhao C, Wang M, Cheng A, Yang Q, Wu Y, Zhu D, et al. Programmed cell death: the battlefield between the host and alpha-herpesviruses and a potential avenue for cancer treatment. Oncotarget. 2018;9(55):30704–19.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    You Y, Cheng AC, Wang MS, Jia RY, Sun KF, Yang Q, et al. The suppression of apoptosis by α-herpesvirus. Cell Death Dis. 2017;8(4):e2749.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Guo Y, Shen C, Cheng A, Wang M, Na Z, Chen S, et al. Anatid herpesvirus 1 CH virulent strain induces syncytium and apoptosis in duck embryo fibroblast cultures. Vet Microbiol. 2009;138(3):258–65.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Zhao C, Wang M, Cheng A, Yang Q, Wu Y, Jia R, et al. Duck plague virus promotes DEF cell apoptosis by activating Caspases, increasing intracellular ROS levels and inducing cell cycle S-phase arrest. Viruses. 2019;11(2):196.

    CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank all members of Avian Disease Research Center for their contributions to this study.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31872475), Sichuan Veterinary Medicine and Drug Innovation Group of China Agricultural Research System (CARS-SVDIP), China Agricultural Research System (CARS-42-17), and Sichuan Province Research Program (2017JY0014).

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Research Center of Avian Disease, College of Veterinary Medicine of Sichuan Agricultural University, Wenjiang District, Chengdu, 611130, Sichuan Province, China

    Xianglong Wu, Renyong Jia, Mingshu Wang, Shun Chen, Mafeng Liu, Dekang Zhu, Xinxin Zhao, Qiao Yang, Ying Wu, Shaqiu Zhang, Juan Huang, Ling Zhang, Yunya Liu, Yanling Yu, Leichang Pan, Bin Tian, Mujeeb Ur Rehman, Xiaoyue Chen & Anchun Cheng

  2. Institute of Preventive Veterinary Medicine, Sichuan Agricultural University, Wenjiang District, Chengdu, 611130, Sichuan Province, China

    Xianglong Wu, Renyong Jia, Mingshu Wang, Shun Chen, Mafeng Liu, Dekang Zhu, Xinxin Zhao, Qiao Yang, Ying Wu, Shaqiu Zhang, Juan Huang, Ling Zhang, Yunya Liu, Yanling Yu, Leichang Pan, Bin Tian, Mujeeb Ur Rehman, Xiaoyue Chen & Anchun Cheng

  3. Key Laboratory of Animal Disease and Human Health of Sichuan Province, Wenjiang District, Chengdu, 611130, Sichuan Province, China

    Renyong Jia, Mingshu Wang, Shun Chen, Mafeng Liu, Dekang Zhu, Xinxin Zhao, Qiao Yang, Ying Wu, Zhongqiong Yin, Shaqiu Zhang, Juan Huang, Ling Zhang, Yunya Liu, Yanling Yu, Leichang Pan, Bin Tian, Mujeeb Ur Rehman, Xiaoyue Chen & Anchun Cheng

Authors
  1. Xianglong Wu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Renyong Jia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mingshu Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Shun Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Mafeng Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Dekang Zhu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Xinxin Zhao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Qiao Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Ying Wu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Zhongqiong Yin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Shaqiu Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Juan Huang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Ling Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Yunya Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  15. Yanling Yu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  16. Leichang Pan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  17. Bin Tian
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  18. Mujeeb Ur Rehman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  19. Xiaoyue Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  20. Anchun Cheng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: RYJ XLW. Performed the experiments: XLW. Analyzed the data: RYJ, MSW, SC, MFL, DKZ, XXZ, QY, YW, ZQY, SQZ, JH, YLY, LCP, BT, MUR, XYC, ACC. Contributed reagents and materials: LZ, YYL. Wrote the paper: XLW, RYJ. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Renyong Jia or Anchun Cheng.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was approved by the Animal Ethics Committee of Sichuan Agricultural University (approval No. XF2016–17).

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wu, X., Jia, R., Wang, M. et al. Downregulation of microRNA-30a-5p contributes to the replication of duck enteritis virus by regulating Beclin-1-mediated autophagy. Virol J 16, 144 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12985-019-1250-5

Download citation

Keywords

  • Duck enteritis virus
  • Autophagy
  • miR-30a-5p
  • Beclin-1

Virology Journal

ISSN: 1743-422X