Skip to main content

Advertisement

We're creating a new version of this page. See preview

  • Research
  • Open Access

Contribution of Tomato torrado virus Vp26 coat protein subunit to systemic necrosis induction and virus infectivity in Solanum lycopersicum

Virology Journal201916:9

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12985-019-1117-9

©  The Author(s). 2019

  • Received: 21 April 2018
  • Accepted: 6 January 2019
  • Published:

Abstract

Background

Tomato torrado virus (ToTV) infection manifests with burn-like symptoms on leaves, leaflets and upper stem parts of susceptible infected plants. The symptoms caused by ToTV may be considered as one of the most severe virus-induced forms of systemic necrosis, which spreads within the whole plant and leads to a lethal phenotype. However, to date there are no data revealing which viral genes encode for a specific pathogenicity determinant that triggers the plant necrotic response for any torradovirus. In this study we evaluated the influence of three coat protein subunits of ToTV: Vp23, Vp26 and Vp35, transiently expressed from a PVX-based vector, and checked their association with the induction of systemic necrosis in infected Solanum lycopersicum L. (cv. Beta Lux), a natural host of ToTV.

Methods

To estimate how ToTV coat protein subunits might contribute in plant response to virus infection we over-expressed the proteins from PVX-based vector in tomato and analyzed enzymatic activities related with plant defense response. By doing protein qualitative analysis performed by mass spectrometry we indicated the PR10 in protein fraction with induced ribonuclease activity.

Results

We observed that only the Vp26 enhanced PVX pathogenicity causing severe necrosis of the infected plant. Moreover, we indicated increased RNase and oxidative activities in plants infected with PVX-Vp26 chimeras only. Importantly, we suspected that this increased RNase activity is associated with increased accumulation of PR10 mRNA and products of its translation.

Conclusions

On the basis of the obtained results, we indicated that Vp26 acts as the elicitor of hypersensitive response-like reactions of PVX-Vp26 manifesting with enhanced pathogenicity of the recombined PVX. This might be the first described suspected necrosis determinant of torradoviruses infecting tomatoes.

Keywords

  • Coat protein
  • Torradovirus
  • Pathogenicity determinant
  • Plant defense
  • Solanum lycopersicum L.
  • Systemic necrosis
  • Plant-virus interaction

Background

Manifestation of virus infection on susceptible plants can be described by the wide range of disease symptoms that develop on the host infected by the pathogenic agent and that lead finally to the lowering of a crop yield and/or its consumer value. Therefore, much effort has been applied to mapping and identifying the host genes involved directly in plant defense responses to virus infection. However, the second component of the interactions—the virus-derived pathogenicity determinants—need to be defined and isolated to identify mechanisms of disease initiation at the very early stages of infection. The well-described RNA silencing suppressor of the cucumber mosaic virus, the 2b protein, which influences local and systemic viral movement, has been reported as a virulence-determining factor in Nicotiana tabacum, where it induces mild mosaic symptoms on upper, non-inoculated leaves [1]. In the cited research the 2b protein was described to act as virulence determinant involved in post-transcriptional gene silencing - a well described plant defence mechanism against viruses. Interestingly, it has also been indicated that coat proteins (CPs), in parallel with their structural function, may also play an important role in the elicitation of disease symptoms, for example, one of the biological functions of the p42 protein of melon necrotic spot virus is directly associated with symptom induction in infected melon plants [2].

The hypersensitive response (HR), that in some cases accompanies virus infection, is based generally on the isolation of virus-infected cells from adjacent healthy tissue, thus preventing further spread of such cells within the host [3]. An invading pathogen triggers a cascade of reactions, resulting in a burst of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in infected cells. The level of ROS and strength of the oxygen burst are strictly controlled by cellular peroxidases (POX), superoxide dismutase (SOD) and catalases. The HR was described to be induced by 2b of cucumber mosaic virus interacting with catalase CAT3 in Arabidopsis thaliana [4] whereas transient expression of the NSm protein in leaves of Sw-5 tomato or Sw-5 transgenic Nicotiana benthamiana resulted in a hypersensitive response [5, 6].

Tomato torrado virus (ToTV) has been classified within the genus Torradovirus in the family Secoviridae [7]. Torradoviruses have a bipartite genome consisting of positive sense (+), single-stranded RNAs encapsidated into nonenveloped virions [7]. RNA1 (7829 nucleotides-nt) encodes for a long polyprotein (2158 amino acids) involved in virus replication. RNA2 (5404 nt) encodes for two open reading frames (ORFs): ORF1 (187 amino acids), that is necessary for systemic infection [8] and a long ORF encoding a polyprotein (1198 amino acids) that can be proteolytically processed into a movement protein (3A) and three coat protein (CP) subunits: Vp35, Vp26 and Vp23 (Fig. 1a). In the presence of viral proteinase, both ToTV polyproteins are cleaved to functional proteins; however, the precise cleavage sites have not yet been identified. In a field and greenhouse conditions ToTV is transmitted by insects. Once the pathogen has been acquired by its vector, the whitefly [9–11], it can be transmitted efficiently to a host, particularly Solanum lycopersicum. The virus spreads within the tomato plants, leading to severe necrosis of the leaves (Fig. 1b), stems and even fruits [12]. It has been indicated that the virus may infect and accumulate in weed species, which serve as a potential source of infection of economically important plant-hosts of the pathogen [13].
Fig. 1
Fig. 1

Molecular and biological properties of tomato torrado virus. a Schematic representation of the ToTV genome. The genomic material of ToTV comprises two polyadenylated RNA strands, RNA1 and RNA2, composed of 7829 nucleotides and 5404 nucleotides, respectively. RNA1 encodes for protease cofactor (PrcCo), helicase (Hel), viral protease (Pro) and RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRP). RNA2 encodes for ORF1 (necessary for systemic infection) and ORF2 encoding movement protein (3A) followed by three capsid protein (CP) subunits (Vp35, Vp26 and Vp23). Dashed lines indicate borders of each CP subunit. b Symptoms induced by ToTV in Solanum lycopersicum cv. Beta Lux

Still little is known about pathogenicity determinants encoded by torradoviruses in a context of disease symptoms induced by the pathogens on a tomato and other host plants. Recently published data concerning ToTV pathogenicity described that a single amino acid mutation in the movement protein domain (the 3A) of the virus can have a substantial impact on virus infectivity in tomato and N. benthamiana [14]. In 2016 we described that N-terminal fragment of polyprotein encoded by ToTV RNA1 induces HR-like reaction in N. benthamiana [15]. However, studies concerning torradoviruses have focused, in majority, on inter- and intraspecies genetic diversity [16–20] rather than on putative proteins that may be involved in pathogenesis and plant–virus interactions.

In this study, we analyzed the possible role of the ToTV CP subunits Vp23, Vp26 and Vp35 in the induction of systemic necrosis in S. lycopersicum (cv. Beta Lux). We used a heterologous protein expression system based on a modified potato virus X (PVX)-derived vector to verify the plant response to the ToTV Vps (coat protein subunits). We showed that Vp26 in particular induces necrosis in plants when expressed from the PVX-based vector.

To examine the impact of the Vp26 protein on cellular defense mechanisms (anti-oxidative: POX as well as on RNase activities), we conducted in-gel enzymatic activity assays, and subsequently we analyzed changes in the level of a transcript encoding pathogenesis-related (PR) protein with putative RNase activities, particularly the SlPR10.

Methods

Virus isolate and plant material

Virus isolate (ToTV-Wal′03 [10] or ToTV-Kra [17]) was maintained on Nicotiana benthamiana and S. lycopersicum (cv. Beta Lux), grown in greenhouse conditions. When the S. lycopersicum (cv. Beta Lux) is challenged by ToTV, it develops systemic necrosis. Infectious clones of the virus (p35ToTV-Kra) were used for manipulations of the ToTV Vp26 [21].

Total RNA extraction and reverse transcription

Total RNA was isolated according to the protocol described previously [22]. The RNA was dissolved in RNase-free water and stored for further use.

For cloning purposes, cDNA was synthesized using 2 μg of total RNA, 1 μl of 50 μM oligo(dT)18 and 200 U SuperScript III reverse transcriptase (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol.

For gene expression purposes, cDNA was synthesized on 2 μg of the DNA-free RNA in the presence of 200 ng of random primers and 200 U of RevertAid Reverse Transcriptase (Thermo Fisher Scientific) following the manufacturer’s protocol. The obtained mixture was diluted in a 1:1 ratio with nuclease-free water and used for a real-time quantitative PCR.

Cloning and expression of coat protein subunit cDNAs

Sequences of all primers used in the study are indicated in Additional file 1: Table S1. PCR amplifications of cDNA fragments encoding viral capsid Vp35, Vp26 and Vp23 subunits were performed with three sets of primer pairs—Vp35SmaF/Vp35SmaR, Vp26SmaF/Vp26SmaR and Vp23SmaF/Vp23SmaR—respectively. Each PCR was done using 2.5 U of PfuUltra II Fusion DNA polymerase (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA), primers and 1 μl of the cDNA. The PCR products were digested with FastDigest SmaI (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and ligated with SmaI-digested and alkaline phosphatase-treated PVX-derived expression vector pgR107 (kindly provided by Prof. David Baulcombe). The ligation mixture was used for the transformation of competent E. coli TOP10 cells (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Sequence-verified plasmids were used for the transformation of a competent A. tumefaciens GV3101 strain (with the helper pSoup plasmid), grown for 2–3 days at 28 °C on LB-agar plates supplemented with 50 μg/ml of kanamycin and 5 μg/ml of tetracycline. A single bacterial colony was selected using a sterile toothpick and inoculated to a 3-week-old lower leaf (punched six times around a leaf’s main vein) of S. lycopersicum (cv. Beta Lux) seedlings. Plants were maintained at 28 °C in temperature-controlled greenhouse chambers with a 14-h/10-h light/dark photoperiod. When the infection symptoms became apparent, they were photographed, and the plant material was collected for subsequent analyses. Agro-inoculation was conducted in four replicates with PVX-Vp35, PVX-Vp26 and PVX-Vp23 constructs, whereas plants infected with unmodified PVX vector served as a negative control.

Alternatively, the plants were inoculated by means of agro-infiltration. For this purpose, several A. tumefaciens colonies were picked and grown at 28 °C for 24–48 h in liquid LB medium with the aforementioned antibiotics. The bacteria were then harvested and resuspended in infiltrating medium (10 mM MgCl2, 0.5 μM acetosyringone, 10 mM MES [2-(N-morpholino)-ethanesulfonic acid], pH 5.8). After 2 h’ incubation at room temperature, the bacteria were brought to an OD600 1.0 and used to infiltrate the S. lycopersicum seedlings.

Gene expression and virus accumulation analyses

Expression of the ToTV CP subunits from PVX-based vector in S. lycopersicum (cv. Beta Lux) was confirmed by PCR using the primers and thermal cycling conditions mentioned above. Briefly, the reaction mixture contained 1× reaction buffer, 200 μM dNTPs, 500 nM forward and reverse primers, 1 μl (ca. 50 ng) cDNA, and 0.5 U of Allegro Taq DNA polymerase (Novazym, Poland). The PCR products were separated on a 1% agarose gel, eluted and sequence verified.

Accumulation of genomic RNA of the PVX-chimera was analyzed by means of a reverse transcription real-time PCR (RT-qPCR) approach with primers PVX1/PVX2 (for quantitation of PVX RNA-dependent RNA polymerase ORF). For this purpose, 1 μl of obtained cDNA was added to 9 μl of RT-qPCR master mix containing iTaq™ universal SYBR® Green supermix (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) and 0.5 μM forward and reverse primers. The PCR temperature profile was set as recommended by the manufacturer.

The PR-10 transcript level in the infected tomatoes was estimated by RT-qPCR using primers SlPR10g/SlPR10h. For normalization, the mRNA of the EF1α reference gene (SlEF1α) was used [22]. Gene expression was analyzed using GenEx software (MultiD, Sweden).

Immunological detection

The accumulation of PVX was assessed by means of western blot with antibodies specific to the coat protein of the virus. Briefly, two discs (ca. 5 mm in diameter) were cut out of systemic leaves of plants and were homogenized in a presence of 150 μl 2× Laemlli buffer (Thermo Scientific), boiled for 10 min and centrifuged at 13,000 rpm. The resulted lysate (15 μl) was subjected to 12% SDS-PAGE and fractionated proteins were blotted onto PVDF filter. The filter was blocked in PBS buffer with 0.1 Tween (PBS-T) and 5% non-fat milk, washed three times with PBS-T, incubated with primary antibody against PVX coat protein (1:1,000 dilution; LOEWE,Germany) and subsequently with secondary antibody conjugated with horse radish peroxidase (1:25,000 dilution; Agrisera AB, Sweden). The signal was developed in a presence of ECL Bright substrate (Agrisera AB).

Enzyme activity analyses

In order to assess RNase and antioxidative enzymatic activities, protein extracts were prepared from plants infiltrated with ToTV, PVX or the PVX chimeras. Up to 200 mg of plant material was taken for this purpose and ground in extraction buffer (1 M Tris-HCl pH 7.5 and 20% glycerol) using a micropestle. The resultant homogenate was clarified by centrifugation (13,000 rpm, 30 min, 4 °C) and the supernatant was taken for subsequent analyses. Protein concentration was estimated using the Bradford method [23]. For determining POX and RNase activities, 50 μg of total protein was taken.

The profile of induced RNases was determined as described by Yen and Green [24]. Briefly, protein extracts were resolved on matrix containing acrylamide/N′,N′-methylene-bis-acrylamide and 2.4 mg/mL torula yeast RNA. The gel was placed in running buffer of 1.4% (w/v) glycine, 27.5 mM Tris, and 0.1% (w/v) SDS. The SDS was removed from the gel after two subsequent washes with 0.01 M Tris-HCl buffer supplemented with 25% (v/v) isopropanol, followed by subsequent incubations in 0.01 M and 0.1 M Tris-HCl. The bands corresponding to RNase activity became visible after gel illumination.

The method described previously [25] was used to estimate changes in POX activities. The resolved native PAGE gel was immersed in 50 mM sodium citrate and incubated in the buffer for 30 min. Next, the gel was washed in 1 mM DAB (3,3′-diaminobenzidine) and 0.03% (w/v) hydrogen peroxide in a citrate buffer that was made just before use. Peroxidase activity was identified by the presence of dark-brown bands.

Proteomic analyses: Protein identification and mass spectrometry

The bands containing the protein fractions that showed the RNase activity were excised from the gel and analyzed by liquid chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry. Peptides were separated on a nano-Ultra Performance Liquid Chromatography (UPLC) RP-C18 column (Waters, BEH130 C18 column) using a 45-min linear acetonitrile gradient. The column outlet was directly coupled to an electrospray-ionization (ESI) ion source of an Orbitrap Velos mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific), working within a regime of data-dependent MS to MS/MS switch.

Raw data files were pre-processed using Mascot Distiller software version 2.4.2.0, MatrixScience). The obtained peptide masses and fragmentation spectra were matched to an NCBI (National Center for Biotechnology Information) non-redundant database (31,002,772 sequences/10668937692 residues), with a Viridiplantae filter (1,473,438 sequences) and to a tomato non-redundant database (34,727 sequences/11956401 residues) using the Mascot search engine (Mascot Daemon v. 2.4.0, Mascot Server v. 2.4.1, MatrixScience).

Protein identification was performed using the Mascot search engine (MatrixScience, Boston, MA, USA), with a probability-based algorithm. An expected value threshold of 0.05 was used for analysis.

Bioinformatic analyses

Sequence alignment of tomato torrado virus Vp26s was carried out using BioEdit software [26].

Results

Vp26 triggers local and systemic necrosis in S. lycopersicum infected with PVX-Vp26

The main goal of the study was to identify ToTV genes that may be involved in the induction of the necrosis on tomato infected with the ToTV (Fig. 1). To express ToTV-derived proteins in tomato, we used a PVX-based expression vector (Fig. 2) [27, 28]. The mentioned PVX does not cause any symptoms of infection in tomato plants (cv. Beta Lux) (Fig. 3) and can therefore be used in the studies on the identification of ToTV pathogenicity determinants without risk of inducing nonspecific plant reactions.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2

Plasmid constructs used in the study. Five ORFs of potato virus X are indicated (RdRP – replicase, 25K, 12K, 8K – the triple gene block genes, CP – coat protein gene). The multi-cloning site with cloned tomato torrado virus CP ORFs (Vp23, Vp26 and Vp35) is indicated. Orientation of the Vp ORFs is indicated in a sense (+/+) and anti-sense (+/−) orientation

Fig. 3
Fig. 3

Symptoms manifested in Solanum lycopersicum (cv. Beta Lux) after infection with potato virus X chimeras. General plant view (upper row) as well as close-ups of systemic leaves (bottom row) are included. Healthy plants (mock) are indicated and compared with plants infected with PVX. The images were recorded at 14 dpi (days post infiltration)

The three CP open reading frames (Vp23, Vp26 and V35) from ToTV were introduced into the PVX-based expression vector, creating the following PVX chimeras named hereafter: PVX-Vp23, PVX-Vp26 and PVX-Vp35, respectively. Expression of the inserted transcripts occurred in plants after agro-inoculation of the tomato seedlings with the PVX-Vp constructs. Any PVX infection was monitored visually in systemic leaves on the 6th and 14th day post agro-inoculation; detection of PVX infecting tomato was additionally confirmed by means of RT-PCR.

At six days post inoculation the first necrotic local lesions were visible on the plants infected with PVX-Vp26. The symptoms developed around the inoculation area and gradually migrated along the petiole of the inoculated leaves. Simultaneously, plants inoculated with neither PVX-Vp23 nor PVX-Vp35 displayed any necrotic symptoms within inoculated loci (Table 1).
Table 1

Summarized results obtained from PVX-Vp assays in Solanum lycopersicum on the 6th and 14th day post agro-inoculation

Symptoms observed on Solanum lycopersicum (cv. Beta Lux)

PVX-

Vp23

Vp26

Vp35

6 dpi

Local and petiole necroses (inoculated leaf)

No

Yes

No

Systemic leaf necrosis

No

No

No

Apex necrosis

No

No

No

Plant stunting

No

No

No

14 dpi

Local and petiole necroses (inoculated leaf)

No

Yes

No

Systemic leaf necrosis

No

Yes

No

Apex necrosis

No

Yes

No

Plant stunting

No

Yes

No

The first systemic necrosis developed on the 10th dpi in plants inoculated only with PVX-Vp26; the symptoms became increasingly severe, leading gradually to necrotization of even the lower leaves. Compared with the symptoms induced in plants infected with PVX-Vp26, the plants inoculated with PVX-Vp23 or PVX-Vp35 reacted much less severely when they were examined at the same time points (Fig. 3). To confirm that the Vp23- and Vp35-derived transcripts were expressed from the PVX vector, despite the lack of systemic necrosis in the inoculated plants, a RT-PCR reaction was performed with primers specific for each assessed Vp. The analyses revealed the presence of the Vp23, Vp26 and Vp35 coding sequences in the systemic leaves of plants infected with PVX-Vp23, PVX-Vp26 and PVX-Vp35 (Fig. 4). Importantly, cross-contamination was also excluded. Moreover, western blot with FLAG-specific antibody was done to confirm presence of the FLAG-tagged Vp26 protein in tested plants (see the Additional file 2: Figure S1). To verify that the Vp26-induced necrosis was developed precisely by the properly translated, biologically active Vp26 protein, we inoculated plants with A. tumefaciens harboring a PVX-based vector with the Vp26 ORF in an antisense orientation (PVX-Vp26AS). This would also provide information as to whether the Vp26-encoding RNA itself served as a necrosis inducer. Subsequent observations of the plants’ response (monitored up to the 30th dpi) revealed extreme necrosis of systemic leaves, stem stunting, and death of the lower leaves of tomato plants infected with PVX-Vp26, but not with PVX-Vp26AS. Moreover, a frameshift mutation (adenine residue inserted between positions T314 and A315) introduced into the Vp26 coding sequence (PVX-ΔVp26) resulted in the absence of any systemic necrosis in inoculated plants. Plants expressing Vp23AS and Vp35AS remained symptomless as well, although their open reading frames were detected in PVX- Vp23AS and PVX-Vp35AS (data not shown).
Fig. 4
Fig. 4

Detection of recombinant potato virus X-Vps in infected tomato plants. Total RNA was extracted from systemic leaves of plants infected with each PVX-Vp individually (14 days post infiltration) and taken for reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) with corresponding Vp-specific primers. Specific RT-PCR products were detected for Vp23 (650 base pairs, bp), Vp26 (710 bp) and Vp35 (737 bp) in plants infected with PVX-Vp23, PVX-Vp26 and PVX-Vp35, respectively. Primers flanking a multi-cloning site (mcs) of PVX-vector gave a product of ca. 250 bp for the empty vector

This therefore provides evidence that an RNA-Vp26-derived translation product stimulated the necrotic phenotype in tomato inoculated with PVX-Vp26 and, in the context of the adopted experimental model, is a strong pathogenicity factor.

For subsequent analyses (in-gel activities, gene expression and virus accumulation) plants were collected at 14th dpi.

Systemic necrosis induced during Vp26 expression is not associated with increased accumulation of PVX RNAs

To ascertain whether the severity of the enhanced symptoms relating to the PVX-Vp26 chimera was associated with elevated accumulation of the progeny virus, we examined genomic PVX RNA as well as virus coat protein accumulation in the systemic leaves of PVX-infected plants. For this purpose, a total RNA and soluble protein fraction were prepared from the systemic leaves of infiltrated S. lycopersicum collected at 14th dpi when the systemic necrosis of systemic leaves were observed. Accumulation of the PVX genomic RNA was measured against the standard curve prepared from serial dilution of plasmid pgR107. In the conducted experiments we observed higher accumulation of unmodified PVX than the PVX chimeras (this was confirmed by assessment of accumulation of additional PVX open reading frames: the 25 K and CP, see the Additional file 3: Figure S2). Moreover, we observed that necrosis-associated PVX-Vp26 accumulated at the level lower than remaining two other PVX variants (Fig. 5a). This was surprising, because we expected that necrosis would result from a high titer of the PVX-Vp26 in tomato. Moreover, the observation was verified again by western blot analysis showing that PVX CP accumulated at the highest level in plants infected with the unmodified PVX (Fig. 5b).
Fig. 5
Fig. 5

Comparison of the accumulation level of potato virus X (PVX) RNAs in Solanum lycopersicum (cv. Beta Lux). The analyzed plants were inoculated with PVX-empty construct and PVX chimeras, PVX-Vp23, PVX-Vp26 and PVX-Vp35. a Accumulation of PVX genomic RNA (RNA-dependent RNA polymerase - RdRP) was analyzed by menas of quantitative real-time RT-PCR. The RNA used for the analysis was extracted from systemic leaves of tomato seedlings 14 days post infiltration. The copy number of PVX genomic RNA per 50 ng of total RNA was displayed. The mean (the x), the median (the central horizontal bar) and the outliers (the dots) were included in the box charts. b Western blot analysis of PVX coat protein (CP) accumulation in S. lycopersicum inoculated with tested PVX variants. The normalized densitometry quantitation of chemiluminescence signal was included. The equal protein load was assessed by Coomassie brilliant blue (CBB) staining

Therefore, it can be concluded that the systemic necrosis induced in a presence of the Vp26 was not caused by higher accumulation of the PVX-Vp26 but resulted rather from Vp26 expression in infected/inoculated plants.

Vp26 triggers enzymatic activities related to plant defense mechanisms

The POX and RNase activities were compared in plants infected by ToTV, PVX and PVX-Vp26 by means of in-gel activity assays at 7 and 14 dpi.

Initially we asked if any elevated POX and RNase activities would be observed in tomato infected by ToTV. Indeed, strong POX and RNase activities were detected in plants infected by ToTV already at 7th day after inoculation. At the 14 dpi the activities remained very strong in ToTV-infected plants (Fig. 6a). Next, we checked whether infection of tomato with PVX or PVX-Vp26 would give similar results. Again, the performed experiments indicated that the POX activity increased only in plants infected with PVX-Vp26 (Fig. 6b, the POX panel). At 7 dpi POX activity was observed in protein extracts collected from non-infiltrated and PVX-infected plants, whereas it was evidently higher in plants infected with PVX-Vp26, and at 14 dpi the signal was even stronger (Fig. 6b, the POX panel). Therefore, we concluded that this response was associated with the presence of the Vp26. Increase in POX activity was not observed in plants infected by PVX-Vp35 nor PVX-Vp23.
Fig. 6
Fig. 6

In-gel peroxidase (POX) and ribonuclease (RNase) activity assays. The protein extracts isolated from tomato infected with ToTV (a), PVX or PVX chimeras (b) at 7 and 14 days post inoculation were resolved under native conditions. Enzymatic activities were indicated after gel staining. The bands of RNase activities taken for MS analysis are marked with the asterisk

It was proposed previously that virus replication triggers cellular ribonucleases targeting viral genomic RNA for degradation [29]. Therefore, we assessed whether the expressed Vp26 protein would have an impact on cellular RNase activity as well. First, we checked if ToTV induced stronger RNase activities in infected tomato. In-gel RNase activity assay confirmed that stronger RNase activities were detected in infected tomato at 7 dpi and 14 dpi (Fig. 6a, lower panel). Next, we verified if the increase in RNase activities were also detected in tomatoes infected with the PVX variants. Our results indicated a common band of RNase activity detected in extracts obtained from non-infiltrated, empty PVX- and PVX-Vp-infected plants (Fig. 6b, lower panel). However, at 14 dpi, a band with increased RNase activity was observed in the fractionated protein extracts isolated from plants inoculated with the PVX-Vp26 (Fig. 6b, RNase panel) but not in plants inoculated with other tested PVX recombinants. This induced RNase fraction was excised from the gel and used for subsequent Mass Spectrometry (MS) Orbitrap analyses.

Vp26 enhances the expression of RNase-like PR-10

The protein fraction characterized by Vp26-induced enhanced RNase activity was subjected to Orbitrap Velos-type mass spectrometry analyses. Table 2 summarizes the results of the Mascot searches. For the purpose of the study, however, proteins with putative or experimentally confirmed RNase activity and PR proteins from the Solanaceae family have been subsumed, excluding structural, regulatory or photosynthesis-related records. The MS analysis revealed several protein hits corresponding to PR proteins or PR-like protein families, particularly PR-23 (S. lycopersicum), PR-5 (S. lycopersicum), p14, PR-10 (N. tabacum, S. virginianum), P69G (S. lycopersicum) and PR-4-like proteins (S. lycopersicum). Moreover, the majority of the selected proteins were identified by at least three ions; however, only a single ion has characterized the PR leaf protein 4-like, ribonuclease T2 and protein p14. PR STH-2-like shares the highest amino acid sequence identity with PR-10 proteins from other solanaceous species and was found in the same cluster as them. Therefore, we wondered whether an increase in PR-10 mRNA transcription would accompany a Vp26-induced necrotic response.
Table 2

Pathogenesis-related proteins identified after MS/MS analysis

ID

Name

Theoretical MW [Da]

Sequence coverage [%]

Peptides matched

Score rank

gi|19,315

pathogenesis-related protein PR P23 [Sl]

26,024

40

R.NNCPYTVWAASTPIGGGR.R

R.GQTWVINAPR.G

R.TNCNFDGAGR.G

K.CHAIHCTANINGECPGSLR.V

R.VPGGCNNPCTTFGGQQYCCTQGPCGPTDLSR.F

R.CPDAYSYPQDDPTSTFTCPSGSTNYR.V

322/441

gi|7,414,370

pathogenesis-related protein (PR-5 protein) [Sl]

28,437

25

R.GQSWWFWAPPGTK.M

R.TNCNFDGAGR.G

R.GWCQTGDCGGVLDCK.G

R.CPDAYSYPQDDPTSTFTCQSWTTDYK.I

K.CHPIQCTANINGECPGSLR.V

299/334/383

gi|460,404,652

pathogenesis-related protein STH-2-like [Sl]

17,472

42

K.GLVLDFDSLVPK.L

K.LLSHDVK.S

K.SIEIVEGDGGAGSIK.Q

K.QMNFVEGGPIK.Y + Oxidation (M)

K.IHVIDDK.N

K.IHVIDDKNLVTK.Y

K.YSLIEGDVLGDK.L

K.YSLIEGDVLGDKLESIAYDVK.F

K.FEAAGDGGCVCK.T

K.GDHVVSEEEHNVGK.G

K.AIDLFK.A

K.AIEAYLLANPSVYA.-

193/225/599

gi|224,802

pathogenesis-related, protein p14 [Sl]

14,589

13

R.AQVGVGPMSWDANLASR.A + Oxidation (M)

119/152/279

gi|372,995,481

pathogenesis-related protein PR-10 [Nt]

17,870

15

K.ALVLDADNLIPK.L

K.LHVIDDK.N

K.LHVIDDKNLVTK.Y

K.YSLIEGDVLGDK.L

45/94/151

gi|4,582,642

ribonuclease T2 [Sl]

27,157

7

R.ESSLDESEFSDLISTMEK.N + Oxidation (M)

128

gi|460,400,304

pathogenesis-related protein P69G [Sl]

80,109

4

K.SSYTVQIASPK.G

K.LTYQVTFSK.T

R.SPIAVVLALAK.-

110

gi|51,317,936

pathogenesis-related protein 10 [Sv]

17,690

24

K.QMNFVEGGPIK.Y + Oxidation (M)

K.IHVIDDK.N

K.YSLIEGDVLGDK.L

K.YSLIEGDVLGDKLESINYDIK.F

179

gi|460,402,446

pathogenesis-related leaf protein 4-like [Sl]

18,215

14

R.ASELWVAEKPNYNYGTNQCASGK.V

96

The MS/MS analysis concerns the protein fraction characterized by induced RNase activity. Identified proteins with a score higher than 130 (represented at least twice) are shown in bold. Sl, Solanum lycopersicum; Sv, Solanum virginianum; Nt, Nicotiana tabacum

To estimate the level of PR-10 mRNA in plants infected with PVX-Vp26, an RT-qPCR was performed. First, we analyzed the level of PR-10 mRNA in S. lycopersicum infected by ToTV. Within the set of ToTV-inoculated tested plants some were found symptomless, whereas at the same time, majority of the plants developed necrosis (observations were done ca. at 10 dpi). In comparison to mock-inoculated plants, we observed increased level of PR-10 mRNA in ToTV-infected S. lycopersicum (cv. Beta Lux) – both in plants with necrosis and symptomless ones (Fig. 7a; the presence of ToTV in symptomless plants was confirmed by RT-PCR, Fig. 7b). The quantitative analysis confirmed higher accumulation of both RNA1 and RNA2 of ToTV in plants expressing necrosis (Fig. 7b). Therefore the higher expression of the PR-10 in ToTV-infected plants with developed necrosis might result from higher ToTV accumulation. Next, we checked the expression of the PR-10 in plants infected with the PVX variants.
Fig. 7
Fig. 7

Analysis of expression of the PR-10 in Solanum lycopersicum cv. Beta Lux under experimental conditions. a Comparison of the relative quantity of the PR-10 gene in non-inoculated (mock) and ToTV-infected S. lycopersicum. Plants expressing no symptoms as well as tomatoes with developed necrosis were included. The red dot describes the outlier. b Qualitative (right panel) and quantitative (left panel) detection of ToTV in symptomless and symptomatic S. lycopersicum. c Fold change of PR-10 mRNA in plants inoculated with the wild-type PVX or with PVX-Vp23, PVX-Vp26 and PVX-Vp35. The expression measurements were normalized against an SlEF1α transcript. Asterisks indicate significant differences as analyzed by the Student’s t-test (P < 0.05)

First, we also asked whether the expression of Vp23 and Vp35 would have any impact at a PR-10 transcript level in infected plants. The analyses were performed on total RNA isolated from systemic leaves collected at 14 dpi. A priori, however, to exclude the unspecific impact of PVX on the level of the PR-10 mRNA transcript, the expression of the PR-10 gene was initially estimated by comparing non-infected plants with those infected only with the unmodified PVX. As the level of PR-10 mRNA remained stable in PVX-infected plants (compared with non-inoculated plants), we concluded that infection by the PVX empty vector did not have a significant impact on the expression of PR-10 (Fig. 7c).

Subsequently, we found that, compared with the plants inoculated with the empty PVX, the relative PR-10 expression was not influenced by the presence of either PVX-Vp23 or PVX-Vp35 at 14 dpi. However, when the level of the PR-10 transcript was assessed in the plants infected with PVX-Vp26, RT-qPCR analyses revealed an up-regulation of the PR-10 gene transcription in the infected plants (Fig. 7c). To exclude that the up-regulation of PR-10 was caused by the Vp26-delivering RNA molecule derived from the PVX backbone, comparative RT-qPCR was conducted on an RNA template isolated from plants infected with PVX-Vp26AS. The resulting data indicated similar levels of PR-10 mRNA in plants infected with either PVX-Vp26AS or PVX lacking any insert (data not shown). Therefore, taken together, it can be postulated that PR-10 expression is up-regulated as a result of the presence of Vp26 protein in infected cells.

Discussion

In this study, we analyzed the possible role of the three CP subunits of the ToTV capsid in the induction of severe necrotic-reaction characteristics relating to ToTV infection in S. lycopersicum (cv. Beta Lux). To do so, we initially analyzed whether, and how, the Vps would influence S. lycopersicum (cv. Beta Lux) when over-expressed from a PVX vector. Exploring further, we wondered which biochemical processes could be induced in a plant in the presence of a selected viral effector.

To achieve the goal we made use of a commonly applied experimental approach based on a PVX-derived expression vector. Generally, the PVX-based model has been used successfully to identify a number of putative disease determinants of RNA viruses [28, 30–33], DNA viruses [34–36] and satellite nucleic acids accompanying helper viruses [37]. However, it should be kept in mind that the PVX-based pathosystem raises the possibility of the occurrence in N. benthamiana of unspecific interactions between PVX-derived factors and the protein expressed from the vector [38].

Torrado disease manifests with severe necrosis induced upon infection of S. lycopersicum (cv. Beta Lux) by ToTV (Fig. 1). The first symptoms of infection are visible at 7–10 dpi and gradually develop to a burn-like phenotype (severe necrosis). As a starting point, we assumed that, as the natural way for ToTV transmission in the environment is via whiteflies, hence fully assembled ToTV virion-particles delivered from the vector’s stylet may be exposed to the cellular environment at the first outset of virus invasion. Moreover, supported by previous reports that CPs can be responsible for the induction of symptoms, or their modulation [39–41], we focused on the influence of three ToTV CP subunits—namely, Vp23, Vp26 and Vp35—on the plant response to these molecules. Indeed, we have shown that the Vp26 subunit of a ToTV CP is responsible for the development of systemic necrosis similar to torrado disease symptoms when the protein was over-expressed heterologously from a PVX-based vector in tomato plants. In contrast to plants infected with ToTV or PVX-Vp26, the PVX, PVX-Vp23 and PVX-Vp35 did not induce any necrosis on the inoculated plants (Fig. 2). It has also been shown that a Vp26-induced necrotic response in tomato was not accompanied by a substantially increased accumulation of PVX-Vp26 RNAs. Experimental data described previously [42] showed that a small 4.8 kDa product of ORF6 of TMV did not enhance either TMV or engineered PVX-ORF6 RNA accumulation in N. benthamiana at 12 dpi, although the protein induced severe systemic necrosis in this host. Cao et al. [30] described that the Pns10 protein of rice dwarf virus enhanced the pathogenicity of chimeric PVX without increasing its accumulation. However, Aguilar et al. [38] highlighted the substantial increase in accumulation of the subgenomic RNA of PVX (particularly CP ORF) expressing heterologous viral suppressors of RNA silencing in N. benthamiana.

Next, we analyzed the impact of Vp26 on POX cellular activities. In a classic model, however, the HR limits the occurrence of a pathogen to several cells, restricting virus movement by inducing programmed cell death around the site of infection. The mechanisms are related to, among others, the production of ROS [3, 43]. We have shown that at 14 dpi a strong POX activity was accompanied by the infection of ToTV. Moreover, the strong POX activity was observed in plants expressing the Vp26 protein from PVX backbone compared with plants infected with an empty PVX vector. The observations align with data presented by Dieng [44], where the antioxidant activity of POX was measured in tomato infected with TYLCV (tomato yellow leaf curl virus). The same was observed by Clarke et al. [45], who described an immediate increase in POX activity in Phaseolus vulgaris upon infection by white clover mosaic potexvirus.

We also observed that protein extracts isolated from plants inoculated with ToTV or PVX-Vp26 showed a significant induction of RNase activities compared with plants inoculated with an empty PVX vector. The T2 ribonuclease was the only classic RNase from S. lycopersicum identified in the samples (Table 2). The enzymes belonging to the T2 RNase family are divided into two subfamilies (S-RNases and S-like RNases) [46] and, as was proposed for Arabidopsis thaliana, the T2 RNase is essential for a housekeeping function during ribosomal RNA recycling [47]. Moreover, 23-kDa RNS1, a member of the T2 RNases, was induced after wounding in A. thaliana, both locally and systemically [48]. As all the mentioned plants used in our study were inoculated mechanically after introducing A. tumefaciens into the leaves, this may have affected the T2 activity in the experimental tomato plants. Therefore, we omitted the enzyme in our further analyses.

In the induced RNAse fraction by Vp26, several PR proteins were identified. MS analysis pointed additionally to the pathogenesis protein PR10a (formerly STH-2), which was chosen for further transcript profiling. Previously, it was shown that PR10 expression from Capsicum annuum had been induced during the incompatible interaction with TMV [49] in pepper as well as in Solanum virginianum (S. sutattense), where the SsPR10 was stress- and pathogen-induced [50]. Vp26 also triggered an increase in a PR STH-2-like transcript in S. lycopersicum, and thus may function as the elicitor of the STH-2-like response. Notably, Choi et al. [51] previously reported that the RNase-activity possessing PR-10 was essential to triggering an HR response, and the silencing of its expression compromised resistance in pepper. This correlation between induction of HR by RNases was also described by Kim and Hwang [52] for pathogenesis-related protein 4c isolated from pepper. The PR4c (possessing ribonuclease activity) caused HR cell death in pepper leaves, which was accompanied by enhanced accumulation of H2O2 and significant induction of some defense-response genes. This aligns with the data presented here in our study.

Conclusions

In summary, to our knowledge, this is the first report describing the molecular fundamentals of torrado disease pathogenesis regarding the CPs of the ToTV. Using the experimental system based on a PVX-Vp26 recombinant virus, we showed that Vp26 may be considered as an effector protein inducing a lethal systemic necrosis phenotype in plants where the molecule is expressed in a context of virus infection.

Abbreviations

CP: 

Coat protein

DAB: 

3,3′-diaminobenzidine

dpi: 

Days post inoculation/infiltration

HR: 

Hypersensitive response

MS: 

Mass spectrometry

NBT: 

Nitro blue tetrazolium chloride

NCBI: 

National Center for Biotechnology Information

ORF: 

Open reading frame

POX: 

Peroxidase

PR: 

Pathogenesis-related protein

PVX: 

Potato virus X

RdRP: 

RNA-dependent RNA polymerase

RNase: 

Ribonuclease

ROS: 

Reactive oxygen species

RT-PCR: 

Reverse transcription PCR

RT-qPCR: 

Reverse transcription real-time PCR

SDS-PAGE: 

Sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis

SOD: 

Superoxide dismutase

TEMED: 

N,N,N′,N′-tetramethylethylenediamine

TMV: 

Tobbacco mosaic virus

ToTV: 

Tomato torrado virus

TYLCV: 

Tomato yellow leaf curl virus

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Prof. Peter Palukaitis (Seoul Women’s University) for critical reading of the manuscript and Beata Wielkopolan for her technical support. We would also like to thank Prof. David Baulcombe (Department of Plant Sciences, University of Cambridge) for providing pgR107 plasmids.

Funding

The study was supported by the Polish National Science Center, grants no. UMO/2011/N/NZ9/07131 and UMO/2016/21/D/NZ9/02478.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article and its Additional files

Authors’ contributions

PW and AOS conceived the project and designed the experiments. PW, BW and AP carried out the experiments, PF prepared statistical analysis. PW and AOS analyzed the data and wrote the manuscript. All the authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Entomology, Animal Pests & Biotechnology, Institute of Plant Protection-National Research Institute, Władysława Węgorka 20 St, 60-318 Poznań, Poland

References

  1. Li HW, Lucy AP, Guo HS, Li WX, Ji LH, Wong SM, Ding SW. Strong host resistance targeted against a viral suppressor of the plant gene silencing defence mechanism. EMBO J. 1999;18:2683–91.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Genovés A, Navarro JA, Pallás V. Functional analysis of the five melon necrotic spot virus genome-encoded proteins. J gen Virol. 2006;87:2371–80.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Zurbriggen MD, Carrillo N, Hajirezaei MR. ROS signaling in the hypersensitive response: when, where and what for? Plant Signal Behav. 2010;5:393–6.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Murota K, Shimura H, Takeshita M, Masuta C. Interaction between cucumber mosaic virus 2b protein and plant catalase induces a specific necrosis in association with proteasome activity. Plant Cell Rep. 2017;35:37–47.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Hallwass M, de Oliveira AS, de Campos Dianese E, Lohuis D, Boiteux LS, Inoue-Nagata AK, Resende RO, Kormelink R. The tomato spotted wilt virus cell-to-cell movement protein (NSm) triggers a hypersensitive response in Sw-5-containing resistant tomato lines and in Nicotiana benthamiana transformed with the functional Sw-5b resistance gene copy. Mol Plant Pathol. 2014;15:871–80.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Peiró A, Cañizares MC, Rubio L, López C, Moriones E, Aramburu J, Sánchez-Navarro J. The movement protein (NSm) of tomato spotted wilt virus is the avirulence determinant in the tomato Sw-5 gene-based resistance. Mol Plant Pathol. 2014;15:802–13.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Sanfaçon H, Wellink J, Le Gall O, Karasev A, Van der Vlugt R, Wetzel T. Secoviridae: a proposed family of plant viruses within the order Picornavirales that combines the families Sequiviridae and Comoviridae, the unassigned genera Cheravirus and Sadwavirus. and the proposed genus Torradovirus Arch Virol. 2009;154:899–907.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Ferriol I, Vallino M, Ciuffo M, Nigg JC, Zamora-Macorra EJ, Falk BW, Turina M. The Torradovirus-specific RNA2-ORF1 protein is necessary for plant systemic infection. Mol Plant Pathol. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1111/mpp.12615.
  9. Amari K, González-Ibeas D, Gómez P, Sempere RN, Sánchez-Pina MA, Aranda MA, Diaz-Pendon JA, Navas-Castillo J, Moriones E, Blanca J, Hernandez-Gallardo MD, Anastasio G. Tomato torrado virus is transmitted by Bemisia tabaci and infects pepper and eggplant in addition to tomato. Plant Dis. 2008;92:1139.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Pospieszny H, Borodynko N, Obrepalska-Steplowska A, Hasiow B. The first report of tomato torrado virus in Poland. Plant Dis. 2007;91:1364.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Verbeek M, van Bekkum PJ, Dullemans AM, van der Vlugt RA. Torradoviruses are transmitted in a semi-persistent and stylet-borne manner by three whitefly vector. Virus Res. 2014;186:55–60.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Pospieszny H, Budziszewska M, Hasiow-Jaroszewska B, Obrepalska-Steplowska A, Borodynko N. Biological and molecular characterization of polish isolates of tomato torrado virus. J Phytopathol. 2010;158:56–62.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Alfaro-Fernández A, Córdoba-Sellés C, Cebrián MC, Herrera-Vásquez JA, Sánchez-Navarro JA, Juárez M, Espino A, Martín R, Jordá C. First report of Tomato torrado virus on weed hosts in Spain. Plant Dis. 2008;92:831.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Wieczorek P, Obrępalska-Stęplowska A. A single amino acid substitution in movement protein of tomato torrado virus influences ToTV infectivity in Solanum lycopersicum. Virus Res. 2016;213:32–6.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Wieczorek P, Obrępalska-Stęplowska A. The N-terminal fragment of the tomato torrado virus RNA1-encoded polyprotein induces a hypersensitive response (HR)-like reaction in Nicotiana benthamiana. Arch Virol. 2016;161:1849–58.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Alfaro-Fernández A, Cebrián MC, Herrera-Vásquez JA, Córdoba-Sellés MC, Sánchez-Navarro JA, Jordá C. Molecular variability of Spanish and Hungarian isolates of Tomato torrado virus. Plant Pathol. 2010;59:785–93.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Budziszewska M, Pospieszny H, Obrępalska-Stęplowska A. Genome characteristics, phylogeny and varying host specificity of polish Kra and Ros isolates of Tomato torrado virus. J Phytopathol. 2016;164:281–5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Budziszewska M, Wieczorek P, Zhang Y, Frishman D, Obrępalska-Stęplowska A. Genetic variability within the polish tomato torrado virus Kra isolate caused by deletions in the 3′-untranslated region of genomic RNA1. Virus Res. 2014;185:47–52.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Budziszewska M, Obrepalska-Steplowska A, Wieczorek P, Pospieszny H. The nucleotide sequence of a polish isolate of tomato torrado virus. Virus Genes. 2008;37:400–6.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Verbeek M, Dullemans AM, van den Heuvel JF, Maris PC, van der Vlugt RA. Tomato marchitez virus, a new plant picorna-like virus from tomato related to Tomato torrado virus. Arch Virol. 2008;153:127–34.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Wieczorek P, Budziszewska M, Obrępalska-Steplowska A. Construction of infectious clones of tomato torrado virus and their delivery by agroinfiltration. Arch Virol. 2015;160:517–21.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Wieczorek P, Wrzesińska B, Obrępalska-Stęplowska A. Assessment of reference gene stability influenced by extremely divergent disease symptoms in Solanum lycopersicum L. J Virol Methods. 2013;194:161–8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Bradford MM. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem. 1976;72:248–54.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Yen Y, Green PJ. Identification and properties of the major ribonucleases of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Physiol. 1991;97:487–93.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Christensen JH, Bauw G, Welinder KG, Van Montagu M, Boerjan W. Purification and characterization of peroxidases correlated with lignification in poplar xylem. Plant Physiol. 1998;118:125–35.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Hall TA. BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for windows 95/98/NT. Nucl. Acids. Symp. Ser. 1999;41:95–8.Google Scholar
  27. Lu R, Malcuit I, Moffett P, Ruiz MT, Peart J, Wu AJ, Rathjen JP, Bendahmane A, Day L, Baulcombe DC. High throughput virus-induced gene silencing implicates heat shock protein 90 in plant disease resistance. EMBO J. 2003;22:5690–9.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Scholthof HB, Scholthof KB, Jackson AO. Identification of tomato bushy stunt virus host-specific symptom determinants by expression of individual genes from a potato virus X vector. Plant Cell. 1995;7:1157–72.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Voinnet O. RNA silencing as a plant immune system against viruses. Trends Genet. 2001;17:449–59.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Cao X, Zhou P, Zhang X, Zhu S, Zhong X, Xiao Q, Ding B, Li Y. Identification of an RNA silencing suppressor from a plant double-stranded RNA virus. J Virol. 2005;79:13018–27.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Ruiz-Ruiz S, Soler N, Sánchez-Navarro J, Fagoaga C, López C, Navarro L, Moreno P, Peña L, Flores R. Citrus tristeza virus p23: determinants for nucleolar localization and their influence on suppression of RNA silencing and pathogenesis. Mol Plant-Microbe Interact. 2013;26:306–18.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Young BA, Stenger DC, Qu F, Morris TJ, Tatineni S, French R. Tritimovirus P1 functions as a suppressor of RNA silencing and an enhancer of disease symptoms. Virus Res. 2012;63:672–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Zhou ZS, Dell'Orco M, Saldarelli P, Turturo C, Minafra A, Martelli GP. Identification of an RNA-silencing suppressor in the genome of grapevine virus a. J Gen Virol. 2006;87:2387–95.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Hussain M, Mansoor S, Iram S, Fatima AN, Zafar Y. The nuclear shuttle protein of tomato leaf curl New Delhi virus is a pathogenicity determinant. J Virol. 2005;79:4434–9.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Luna AP, Morilla G, Voinnet O, Bejarano ER. Functional analysis of gene-silencing suppressors from tomato yellow leaf curl disease viruses. Mol Plant-Microbe Interact. 2012;25:1294–306.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Van Wezel R, Liu H, Tien P, Stanley J, Hong Y. Gene C2 of the monopartite geminivirus tomato yellow leaf curl virus-China encodes a pathogenicity determinant that is localized in the nucleus. Mol Plant-Microbe Interact. 2001;14:1125–8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Tahir MN, Mansoor S. βC1 of chili leaf curl betasatellite is a pathogenicity determinant. Virol J. 2011;8:509.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Aguilar E, Almendral D, Allende L, Pacheco R, Chung BN, Canto T, Tenllado F. The P25 protein of potato virus X (PVX) is the main pathogenicity determinant responsible for systemic necrosis in PVX-associated synergisms. J Virol. 2015;89:2090–103.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Hu X, Nie X, He C, Xiong X. Differential pathogenicity of two different recombinant PVY(NTN) isolates in Physalis floridana is likely determined by the coat protein gene. Virol J. 2011;8:207.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Lan P, Yeh WB, Tsai CW, Lin NS. A unique glycine-rich motif at the N-terminal region of bamboo mosaic virus coat protein is required for symptom expression. Mol Plant-Microbe Interact. 2010;23:903–14.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Park SH, Sit TL, Kim KH, Lommel SA. The red clover necrotic mosaic virus capsid protein N-terminal lysine-rich motif is a determinant of symptomatology and virion accumulation. Mol Plant Pathol. 2012;13:744–54.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Canto T, MacFarlane SA, Palukaitis P. ORF6 of Tobacco mosaic virus is a determinant of viral pathogenicity in Nicotiana benthamiana. J. Gen. Virol. 2004;85:3123–3133.Google Scholar
  43. Torres MA, Jones JD, Dangl JL. Reactive oxygen species signaling in response to pathogens. Plant Physiol. 2006;141:373–8.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  44. Dieng H, Satho T, Hassan AA, Aziz AT, Morales RE, Hamid SA, Miake F, Abubakar S. Peroxidase activity after viral infection and whitefly infestation in juvenile and mature leaves of Solanum lycopersicum. J Phytopathol. 2011;159:707–12.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  45. Clarke SF, Guy PL, Burritt DJ, Jameson PE. Changes in the activities of antioxidant enzymes in response to virus infection and hormone treatment. Physiol Plant. 2002;114:157–64.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  46. MacIntosh GC, Hillwig MS, Meyer A, Flagel L. RNase T2 genes from rice and the evolution of secretory ribonucleases in plants. Mol Gen Genomics. 2010;283:381–96.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  47. Hillwig MS, Contento AL, Meyer A, Ebany D, Bassham DC, Macintosh GC. RNS2, a conserved member of the RNase T2 family, is necessary for ribosomal RNA decay in plants. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108:1093–8.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  48. LeBrasseur ND, MacIntosh GC, Pérez-Amador MA, Saitoh M, Green PJ. Local and systemic wound-induction of RNase and nuclease activities in Arabidopsis: RNS1 as a marker for a JA-independent systemic signaling pathway. Plant J. 2002;29:393–403.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  49. Park CJ, Kim KJ, Shin R, Park JM, Shin YC, Paek KH. Pathogenesis-related protein 10 isolated from hot pepper functions as a ribonuclease in an antiviral pathway. Plant J. 2004;37:186–98.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  50. Liu X, Huang B, Lin J, Fei J, Chen Z, Pang Y, Sun X, Tang K. A novel pathogenesis-related protein (SsPR10) from Solanum surattense with ribonucleolytic and antimicrobial activity is stress- and pathogen-inducible. J Plant Physiol. 2006;163:546–56.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  51. Choi DS, Hwang IS, Hwang BK. Requirement of the cytosolic interaction between PATHOGENESIS-RELATED PROTEIN 10 and LEUCINE-RICH REPEAT PROTEIN1 for cell death and defense signaling in pepper. Plant Cell. 2012;24:1675–90.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  52. Kim NH, Hwang BK. Pepper pathogenesis-related protein 4c is a plasma membrane-localized cysteine protease inhibitor that is required for plant cell death and defense signaling. Plant J. 2015;81:81–94.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2019

Advertisement

Virology Journal

ISSN: 1743-422X