Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Research
  • Open Access

RIG-I is responsible for activation of type I interferon pathway in Seneca Valley virus-infected porcine cells to suppress viral replication

  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 2,
  • 1,
  • 1Email author and
  • 1Email author
Virology Journal201815:162

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12985-018-1080-x

  • Received: 19 July 2018
  • Accepted: 15 October 2018
  • Published:

Abstract

Background

Retinoic acid-inducible gene I (RIG-I) is a key cytosolic receptor of the innate immune system. Seneca valley virus (SVV) is a newly emerging RNA virus that infects pigs causing significant economic losses in pig industry. RIG-I plays different roles during different viruses infections. The role of RIG-I in SVV-infected cells remains unknown. Understanding of the role of RIG-I during SVV infection will help to clarify the infection process of SVV in the infected cells.

Methods

In this study, we generated a RIG-I knockout (KO) porcine kidney PK-15 cell line using the Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats (CRISPR)/CRISPR-associated protein-9 nuclease (Cas9) genome editing tool. The RIG-I gene sequence of RIG-I KO cells were determined by Sanger sequencing method, and the expression of RIG-I protein in the RIG-I KO cells were detected by Western bloting. The activation status of type I interferon pathway in Sendai virus (SeV)- or SVV-infected RIG-I KO cells was investigated by measuring the mRNA expression levels of interferon (IFN)-β and IFN-stimulated genes (ISGs). The replicative state of SVV in the RIG-I KO cells was evaluated by qPCR, Western bloting, TCID50 assay and indirect immunofluorescence assay.

Results

Gene editing of RIG-I in PK-15 cells successfully resulted in the destruction of RIG-I expression. RIG-I KO PK-15 cells had a lower expression of IFN-β and ISGs compared with wildtype (WT) PK-15 cells when stimulated by the model RNA virus SeV. The amounts of viral RNA and viral protein as well as viral yields in SVV-infected RIG-I WT and KO cells were determined and compared, which showed that knockout of RIG-I significantly increased SVV replication and propagation. Meanwhile, the expression of IFN-β and ISGs were considerably decreased in RIG-I KO cells compared with that in RIG-I WT cells during SVV infection.

Conclusion

Altogether, this study indicated that RIG-I showed an antiviral role against SVV and was essential for activation of type I IFN signaling during SVV infection. In addition, this study suggested that the CRISPR/Cas9 system can be used as an effective tool to modify cell lines to increase viral yields during SVV vaccine development.

Keywords

  • RIG-I
  • SVV
  • Interferon
  • Immune response
  • Viral replication

Background

Clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR) exists widely in bacteria and archaea, which provides acquired immunity and causes interference against foreign bacteriophages invasion [1, 2]. The initial discovery of the CRISPR was in Escherichia coli in 1987 [3]. CRISPR loci consists of 21- to 48-base pair (bp) noncontiguous direct repeats separated by non-repetitive sequences called spacers, and flanked by diverse CRISPR-associated genes (Cas genes) [4]. Cas genes encode an allogenetic and more complex family of proteins that perform similar functions as helicases, nuclease, and RNA-binding proteins [5].

Upon the locus organization and gene conservation, CRISPR has been divided into three main types: type1, type2 and type3 [6]. Among them, the type2 CRISPR system has been used broadly in the field of genome editing in various species and cell types. The type2 CRISPR system includes the Cas9 nuclease, a noncoding trans-activating crRNA (tracerRNA) and a precursor crRNA [7].The crRNA fuses to the tracerRNA guiding the Cas9 protein to bind with the target DNA sequences causing a strand-specific cleavage [8]. A double-stranded break (DSB) is introduced in the chromosome and then the damaged DNA is repaired by non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) pathway. Insertions or deletions (indels) are generated by NHEJ, leading to frameshift mutation or premature stop codons and destruction of gene expression [9]. CRISPR-Cas9 system has a series of advantages such as simple to design, efficient, cheap, and relatively accurate genome editing in host cells comparing with the others genome editing technologies, such as zinc-finger nucleases (ZFNs) and transcription activator-like effector nucleases (TALENs) [10].

Innate immune system recognizes pathogens by pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) including Toll-like receptor (TLRs), RIG-I-like receptor (RLRs), nucleotide oligomerization domain-like receptor (NLRs) and cytosolic DNA sensors [11, 12]. PRRs-mediated antiviral signaling induces the expression of interferons (IFNs), proinflammatory cytokines and IFN-stimulated genes (ISGs) during viral infections [13]. RLRs are cytosolic RNA sensors, consisting of three members: retinoic acid-inducible (RIG-I), melanoma differentiation-associated gene 5 (MDA5), and laboratory of genetics and physiology-2 (LGP2). RIG-I has a DExH/D helicase core flanked by two N-terminal tandem CARDs and a C-terminal domain (CTD) [14, 15]. RIG-I detects a wide variety of RNA viruses, such as influenza A virus, newcastle disease virus (NDV) and Ebola virus [1618].

RIG-I mainly recognizes free 5′ triphosphate end structures and short dsRNAs; and MDA5 mainly recognizes long dsRNA [12, 19]. Seneca valley virus (SVV) is a newly emerging RNA virus that belongs to the genus Senecavirus of family Picornaviridae. SVV infects pigs and causes vesicular disease in pigs that presents similar clinical signs with foot-and-mouth disease (a highly contagious and economically devastating viral disease of pigs and ruminants). As a newly emerging virus in pigs, there are many aspects of the virus and the disease that are not yet fully understood, the mechanisms about the sensing, replication and pathogenesis of SVV have not been clarified. Foot-and-mouth disease virus (FMDV) is the causative agent of foot-and-mouth disease, which also belongs to the family Picornaviridae [20]. FMDV is mainly sensed by MDA5 but not RIG-I in the infected cells [21]. However, the role of RIG-I in SVV-infected cells remains unknown.

In present study, we developed a porcine RIG-I knockout (KO) cell line using the CRISPR-Cas9 gene-editing technology and evaluated the role of RIG-I in SVV-infected porcine cells. The established RIG-I KO cell line can be used as a good model for investigation of RIG-I-associated immune response in pig cells; and we determined that RIG-I presented an antiviral role against SVV and was essential for activation of type I IFN signaling during SVV infection. These data provide an insight for increase of SVV propagation during vaccine production by knockout of RIG-I from the engineering cell lines.

Materials and methods

Cells, virus and reagents

Porcine kidney PK-15 cells were cultured in DMEM/High Glucose supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum and 1% penicillin-streptomycin. SVV was isolated previously and preserved by our lab [22]. T7 endonuclease 1 (T7E1) was purchased from New England Biolabs (NEB). Mouse polyclonal antibody against RIG-I was purchased from Cell Signaling Technology. Mouse monoclonal antibody against β-actin was purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz). The rabbit polyclonal antibody against SVV viral structural protein VP2 was prepared by our lab.

Construction of RIG-I CRISPR-Cas9 plasmids, transfection and single-cell isolation

Three sgRNA sequences were designed by an online CRISPR Design Tool (http://crispr.mit.edu/), targeting the first exon of porcine RIG-I gene (Table 1). The BbsI sites were added in the 5′-terminal of sgRNA sequences. The synthesized sgRNA oligonucleotides were resuspended (100 μM) and mixed, and then were annealed by the following conditions: 95 °C for 5 min and then ramp down from 95 °C to 85 °C at 2 °C/s; then ramp down from 85 °C to 25 °C at 0.1 °C/s. The annealed sgRNA oligonucleotides were cloned into the CRISPR-Cas9 vector pX330 plasmid (Addgene plasmid: 42230) at BbsI site by using T4 Ligase. PK-15 cells were seeded into 12-well plates (3 × 105 cells). The pX330-sgRNA plasmids or pX330 vector plasmids (2 μg) were transfected into PK-15 cells using electrophoretic transfer (Nucleofector™ 2b Device System). The transferred cells were reseeded in 6-well plates at 37 °C. After 72 h post-transfection, the cells were divided into two parts. Genomic DNA was extracted from one part of cells and used for analysis of RIG-I genomic DNA. Another part was cultured continuously forpreservation. After the effectiveness of sgRNA was confirmed by T7 endonuclease cleavage assay, the transfected cells were diluted and cultured to isolate single cell clone by limiting dilution method. The amounts of the transfected cells were counted and serially diluted to a density of 0.5 cell per well. The diluted cells were seeded in 96-well plate for monoclonal cultivation for about 1 week. The cells grown from single-cell clone were selected for genomic analysis. The extracted genomic DNA from these single-cell clones was used as template to amplify the target region sequence and evaluate the knockout consequence. The detection primers (Forward: 5′-AAGTGGTTACACCGCATACA-3′; Reverse: 5′-CACCTCAAACTCCGACAATC-3′) were used to amplify the target region sequence. The PCR products were cloned into pMD18-T vector. Eight plasmids per sample were sequenced to confirm frameshift mutation at allele gene.
Table 1

The designed sgRNA sequences targeting porcine RIG-I gene

sgRNA

Forward

Reverse

sgRNA1

CACCGACGCTTTCGGGGACTATGTC

AAACGACATAGTCCCCGAAAGCGTC

sgRNA2

CACCGCGGCGGAATCTGCACGCTTT

AAACAAAGCGTGCAGATTCCGCCGC

sgRNA3

CACCGCGGAATCTGCACGCTTTCG

AAACCGAAAGCGTGCAGATTCCGC

T7 endonuclease 1 (T7E1) cleavage assay

The efficiency of three sgRNA sequences for introduction of indels in RIG-I genomic DNA was compared. The genomic DNA was extracted using the DNA Quick DNA extraction kit (QIAGEN) from the pX330-sgRNA plasmids transfected cells according to the manufacturer’s instructions. A pair of detection primers was used to amplify the genomic region that includes the target site. 200 ng of PCR products were denatured and re-annealed according to following conditions: 95 °C for 5 min and then ramp down from 95 °C to 85 °C at 2 °C/s; then ramp down from 85 °C to 25 °C at 0.1 °C/s. The annealed DNA products were treated with T7 endonuclease l for 15 min at 37 °C. The digested products were then subjected to electrophoresis on 1.5% agarose gel.

Viral infection

RIG-I KO or wildtype (WT) PK-15 cells were cultured in 12-well plates. The monolayer cells were incubated with SVV at multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 0.1 for 1 h at 37 °C. The supernatant was removed and the cells were maintained with DMEM with 1% FBS as previously described [23].

TCID50 assay

The 50% tissue culture infective dose (TCID50) assay was performed as previously described [23]. PK-15 cells were seeded on 96-well cell culture plates. The monolayer cells were inoculated with 100 μl of 10-fold serial dilutions of samples and were tested in eight replicates. The cells were cultured until cytopathic effects were clearly observed. The TCID50 values were determined using the Reed-Muench method [24, 25].

Western bloting analysis

The Western bloting assay was performed as previously described [26]. Briefly, the RIG-I KO or WT PK-15 cells were lysed in the lysis buffer and boiled at 95 °C. The lysates were then subjected to sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE). The proteins were transferred onto a nitrocellulose membrane (Pall) after running gel and were incubated with appropriate antibodies. The antigen-antibody complex was visualized by Supersignal West Pico Chemiluminescence Substrate purchased from Thermo Scientific.

Real-time qPCR

Total RNA was extracted from cells using the TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen) and the cDNA was synthesized via reverse transcription using avian myeloblastosis virus reverse transcriptase following the manufacturer’s instructions. The quantitative PCR experiment was performed using the TB Green Premix ExTaq reagents (TaKaRa) on the QuantStudio5 QPCR system (Applied Biosystems). Relative expression of mRNA was normalized to the expression of glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) using the 2−ΔΔCT method. All qPCR specific primers are listed in Table 2.
Table 2

The qPCR primers used in this study

Gene

Primers(5′ → 3′)

SVV

Forward: AGAATTTGGAAGCCATGCTCT

Reverse: GAGCCAACATAGARACAGATTGC

GAPDH

Forward: ACATGGCCTCCAAGGAGTAAGA

Reverse: GATCGAGTTGGGGCTGTGACT

IFN-β

Forward: GCTAACAAGTGCATCCTCCAAA

Reverse: AGCACATCATAGCTCATGGAAAGA

MXA

Forward: GAGGTGGACCCCGAAGGA

Reverse: CACCAGATCCGGCTTCGT

GBP1

Forward: AGCACCTTCGTCTACAACAGC

Reverse: TCAGCCGAGTCCTCAATCC

Indirect immunofluorescence assay (IFA)

RIG-I KO or WT PK-15 cells were seeded in 12-wells and mock-infected or infected with SVV for 10 h. The cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 30 min and then permeabilized with 0.25% Triton X-100 at room temperature for 5 min. After three times washes with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), the cells were blocked with 5% bovine serum albumin in PBS for 30 min and then incubated with anti-VP2 antibody at 4 °C overnight. The cells were then washed for five times with PBS and incubated with Alexa-Fluor 488 goat anti-rabbit secondary antibody for 30 min, followed by incubation with 4,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) for 5 min. After washing with PBS, the fluorescent images were acquired using Leica Microsystems.

Statistics and data analysis

All experiments were performed in triplicate and at least three times. Significant differences were calculated using Student’s t test. *P < 0.05 was considered as significant, **P < 0.01 and ***P < 0.001 were taken as highly significant.

Results

Knockout of RIG-I using CRISPR/Cas 9 system

To generate RIG-I KO PK-15 cells, we designed three RIG-I-specific CRISPR-Cas9 sgRNAs targeting the first exon of the porcine RIG-I. The sgRNA was cloned into the pX330 vector using the BbsI terminal sequences. The pX330-sgRNA1, pX330-sgRNA2 and pX330-sgRNA3 plasmids were transfected into PK-15 cells respectively. The T7E1 assay indicated that there were indels introduced into the RIG-I genome resulting from transfection of pX330-sgRNA3 plasmid (Fig. 1a). The PK-15 cells transfected with pX330-sgRNA3 were seeded into 96-wells plates for single-cell screening by the limiting dilution method (0.5 cell each well). The genomic DNA extracted from the single-clone cells were used as the template for amplification of the genomic region that included the target site. The amplified fragments were cloned into pMD-18 T vectors. Eight plasmids for each single-cell clone sample were sequenced to confirm the frame-shifting mutation of both alleles of the established cell line. We successfully acquired one homozygous RIG-I KO cell line with 11 nucleotides deletion in one allele and one nucleotide insertion in another allele of RIG-I genome (Fig. 1b). The Sanger sequencing results indicated the clean sequence peaks were obtained (Fig. 1c).
Fig. 1
Fig. 1

Generation of a RIG-I KO PK-15 cell line by CRISPR/Cas9 system. a The electrophoresis results of the T7E1 assay. Red arrow showed PCR amplicons and green arrow indicated the cleaved fragments. b The sgRNA3 targeted sequences in the RIG-I gene. GGG (green) was the PAM locus. A bi-allelic modifications were presented in KO-1# and KO-2#. The dashed line (red) respresented deletion and highlighted bases indicated indels. c Sanger sequencing results showing the indels into the two alleles. d Western bloting analysis of RIG-I expression in the RIG-I KO and WT PK-15 cells. β-actin was used to normalize the protein loading quantities

RIG-I protein is undetectable in the established KO cell line

To further confirm the silence of RIG-I expression in the screened RIG-I KO cell line, the RIG-I protein expression in the RIG-I WT and KO PK-15 cells were evaluated by Western bloting analysis. The results showed that RIG-I protein was not detected in the RIG-I KO PK-15 cells, however, it can be detected from the RIG-I WT cells (Fig. 1d). These data suggested that the RIG-I KO PK-15 cell line was successfully established.

Investigation of IFN-β and ISGs expression in RIG-I KO PK15 cells infected with SeV

RIG-I acts as a cytosolic receptor that plays a significant role in sensing invading pathogens. RIG-I is implicated in recognition of vesicular stomatitis virus, Sendai virus (SeV), NDV and many RNA viruses. After detecting RNA virus, RIG-I activates the signal transduction of type I IFN signal pathway and induces the expression of IFN-β, proinflammatory cytokines and hundreds of ISGs, suppressing viral replication by various mechanisms. SeV is a model RNA virus routinely used to activates type I IFN pathway signaling in cell culture [2729]. We analyzed the transcript levels of IFN-β and several ISGs including ISG15, MXA and GBP1 in RIG-I WT and KO cells infected by SeV. SeV infection considerably induced IFN-β and ISGs expression in RIG-I WT PK-15 cells. However, in the RIG-I KO PK-15 cells, SeV infection triggered remarkably weak expression of IFN-β and ISGs (Fig. 2). These results suggested that RIG-I was an important sensor in PK-15 cells to induce the expression of IFN-β and ISGs, and the RIG-I KO PK-15 cells carried a defective type I IFN signal pathway.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2

RIG-I KO PK-15 cells showed higher levels of IFN-β and ISGs than that in the WT PK-15 cells upon Sev stimulation. RIG-I KO and WT PK-15 cells were mock-infected or infected with SeV (100 HAU/ml) for 12 h. The expression levels of IFN-β (a), ISG15 (b), MxA (c)), GBP1 (d) were evaluated by qPCR

Evaluation of SVV replication in RIG-I KO PK-15 cells

As a newly emerging disease, SVV has caused a significant economic loss to pig industry. However, many aspects of the mechanisms about SVV remain unknown. Our previous study has showed that PK-15 cell was permissive for SVV infection [22]. To investigate the potential role of RIG-I in PK-15 cells, we evaluated the replication status of SVV in both RIG-I KO and WT PK-15 cells. The same amount of RIG-I KO and WT PK-15 cells were incubated with equal amount of SVV (0.1 MOI). The viral RNA and viral protein levels were determined at 10 h post infection (hpi). As shown in Fig. 3a and b, both the viral RNA and viral protein levels were higher in RIG-I KO PK-15 cells than that in RIG-I WT PK-15 cells. The expression of viral proteins was also detected by IFA. A considerably higher expression of SVV proteins were observed in RIG-I KO PK-15 cells than that in RIG-I WT PK-15 cells (Fig. 3c). The viral yeilds in SVV-infected RIG-I WT and KO cells at different time points were further measured and compared, which also suggested that SVV replicated more rapidly in the RIG-I KO cells than that in the WT cells (Fig. 3d). These results indicated that RIG-I played an antiviral function during SVV infection in PK-15 cells.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3

Knockout of RIG-I enhanced SVV replication in PK-15 cells. a RIG-I KO and WT PK-15 cells were infected with SVV (MOI of 0.1) respectively, and the cellular samples were collected at 10 hpi. Viral RNA levels were detected by qPCR, (b) viral protein levels were detected by western bloting, and (c) viral protein levels were detected by IFA. d RIG-I KO and WT PK-15 cells were infected with equal amounts of SVV for 6, 10 or 14 h, the viral titers were detected by TCID50 assay

RIG-I is essential for activation of type I IFN signal pathway during SVV infection in PK-15 cells

Knockout of RIG-I significantly increased SVV replication. To investigate whether RIG-I is involved in type I IFN signal pathway activation during SVV infection, the expression of IFN-β and several ISGs including ISG15, MXA and GBP1 in RIG-I WT and KO cells infected by SVV was detected. SVV infection also triggered high expression of IFN-β and ISGs in RIG-I WT PK-15 cells (Fig. 4), suggesting that SVV infection activated type I IFN signaling. However, the expression of IFN-β and ISGs was significantly decreased in SVV-infected RIG-I KO PK-15 cells. This indicated that SVV infection activated type I IFN signal pathway, and RIG-I was essential for the activation of type I IFN signal pathway to induce IFN-β and ISGs expression. RIG-I might be responsible for viral RNA recognition during SVV infection.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4

RIG-I was essential for type I IFN signal pathway activation during SVV infection. RIG-I KO and WT PK-15 cells were mock-infected or infected with SVV at an MOI of 0.1 for 10 h. The expression levels of IFN-β (a), MxA (b), ISG15 (c), GBP1 (d) were measured by qPCR

Discussion

CRISPR/Cas9 system has been widely used in generation of gene modification cell lines or animals. In the transgenic research in pigs, a number of knock-in or knockout porcine cells and pigs have been generated using CRISPR/Cas9 system [3033]. Such as the critical region of fusion receptor of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV), CD163 subdomain 5 has been knocked out from porcine immune cells. The knockout monocyte and macrophage cells were completely resistant to PRRSV infection [34]. In present study, we generated an innate immune sensor RIG-I knockout porcine cell line using the CRISPR/Cas9 system. Western bloting analysis showed that RIG-I protein was completely depleted in the established RIG-I KO cell line (Fig. 1). Because the indels were introduced into the first exon of RIG-I gene, we asserted that RIG-I expression had been completely destructed in the RIG-I KO cells.

After sensing of pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs), RIG-I is activated and interacts with mitochondrial antiviral-signaling protein (MAVS) to induce the production of type I IFN and various cytokines [11, 12]. Type I IFN subsequently activates the janus kinase (JAK) signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) pathway to induce numerous ISGs expression [35]. The high expression of cytokines and ISGs plays crucial functions to inhibit virus replication [36]. RIG-I also induces the adaptor molecule STING expression and restricts virus infection [37]. In various human and mouse cells, depletion of RIG-I results in decreased expression of IFNs, proinflammatory cytokines and ISGs during several virus infection [12, 38, 39]. However, few studies have been performed to investigate the situation in the porcine cells. In this study, we established an RIG-I KO PK-15 cell line. Knockout of porcine RIG-I also resulted in the decrease of SeV-induced IFN-β and ISGs expression as compared that in the RIG-I WT cells (Fig. 2). This indicated that RIG-I also performed an import role in innate immune signaling in porcine cells.

SVV was first isolated from a culture contaminant in 2002, and the genome sequence was first confirmed in 2005. SVV is initially used as an oncolytic virus for treatment of cancer [40]. Recently, outbreaks of SVV infection in pigs have emerged and rapidly spread in many countries and caused severe economic loss [22, 41, 42]. We isolated an epidemic SVV strain CH-FJ-2017 (GenBank: KY747510.1) from pigs previously. To investigate the role of RIG-I in SVV-infected cell, we compared viral replication of CH-FJ-2017 and expression of IFN-β and several ISGs between RIG-I KO and WT PK-15 cells. We determined that RIG-I showed an antiviral role against SVV, and found that knockout of RIG-I decreased the expression of IFN-β and several ISGs during SVV infection (Figs. 3 and 4). Gene knockout studies have distinguished the roles of RIG-I and MDA5 in response to RNA viruses. FMDV is mainly sensed by MDA5, however, in the present study, RIG-I is essential for type I IFN pathway activation during SVV infection. This implies that RIG-I might be responsible for sensing of SVV. SVV includes a shorter viral genome (~ 7.2 kb) compared with FMDV genome (~ 8.5 kb), the sensing of two viruses by host cells might be different.

Knockout of RIG-I considerably increased SVV propagation. At present, there are no available commercial vaccines against SVV. Our previous study developed an inactivated vaccine that might be used as a potential vaccine to prevent SVV spread [43]. Here, we showed that establishment of a RIG-I KO cell line using the CRISPR/Cas9 system is a strategy for increasing the viral yields of SVV. This indicates that the CRISPR/Cas9 system can be used as an effective tool to modify cell lines to increase viral yields during SVV vaccines development, and RIG-I gene is a potential target.

Conclusions

RIG-I plays different roles during different viruses infections. Basing on knockout of RIG-I from porcine cells, we determined that RIG-I is responsible for sensing of SVV and activation of type I interferon pathway in SVV-infected cells. RIG-I played a significant antiviral role against SVV. SVV is a newly emerging RNA virus that infects pigs and causes significant economic losses in pig industry. This study helped to understand the infection process of SVV in the infected cells and also suggested that the CRISPR/Cas9 system can be used as an effective tool to modify cell lines to increase viral yields during SVV vaccine development.

Abbreviations

CRISPR-Cas9: 

Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats/CRISPR-associated protein-9 nuclease

INF-β: 

interferon-β

ISGs: 

IFN-stimulated genes

KO: 

knockout

PRRs: 

pattern recognition receptors

RIG-I: 

Retinoic acid-inducible gene I

SeV: 

Sendai virus

SVV: 

Seneca valley virus

WT: 

wildtype

Declarations

Funding

This work was supported by grants from the National Key Research and Development Program of China (No. 2018YFD0500100). The Key Development and Research Foundation of Yunnan (2018BB004). The Chinese Academy of Agricultural Science and Technology Innovation Project (CAAS-XTCX2016011–01 and Y2017JC55).

Availability of data and materials

All relevant information is provided in this current manuscript.

Authors’ contributions

PL, XZ, ZZ and HZ contributed to the study conception and design. PL, ZZ and HZ wrote the manuscript. MZ, XL and HZ checked and revised it. PL and XZ carried out the establishment of knockout cell line. WC, FY, XD and ZS helped with the virus challenge experiments and contributed to the data analysis. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The requirement for individual written informed consent was waived since the study was cell experiment.

Consent for publication

This manuscript is approved for publication by Lanzhou Veterinary Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
State Key Laboratory of Veterinary Etiological Biology, National Foot and Mouth Diseases Reference Laboratory, Key Laboratory of Animal Virology of Ministry of Agriculture, Lanzhou Veterinary Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Lanzhou, 730046, China
(2)
College of Veterinary Medicine, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, 712100, Shaanxi, China

References

  1. Bolotin A, Quinquis B, Sorokin A, Ehrlich SD. Clustered regularly interspaced short palindrome repeats (CRISPRs) have spacers of extrachromosomal origin. Microbiology. 2005;151:2551–61.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Barrangou R, Fremaux C, Deveau H, Richards M, Boyaval P, Moineau S, Romero DA, Horvath P. CRISPR provides acquired resistance against viruses in prokaryotes. Science. 2007;315:1709–12.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Ishino Y, Shinagawa H, Makino K, Amemura M, Nakata A. Nucleotide sequence of the iap gene, responsible for alkaline phosphatase isozyme conversion in Escherichia coli, and identification of the gene product. J Bacteriol. 1987;169(12):5429–33.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Deveau H, Garneau JE, Moineau S. CRISPR/Cas system and its role in phage-bacteria interactions. Annu Rev Microbiol. 2010;64:475–93.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Haft DH, Selengut J, Mongodin EF, Nelson KE. A guild of 45 CRISPR-associated (Cas) protein families and multiple CRISPR/Cas subtypes exist in prokaryotic genomes. PLoS Comput Biol. 2005;1:e60.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Makarova KS, Haft DH, Barrangou R, Brouns SJ, Charpentier E, Horvath P, Moineau S, Mojica FJ, Wolf YI, Yakunin AF, et al. Evolution and classification of the CRISPR-Cas systems. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2011;9:467–77.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Mali P, Yang L, Esvelt KM, Aach J, Guell M, DiCarlo JE, Norville JE, Church GM. RNA-guided human genome engineering via Cas9. Science. 2013;339:823–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Sato M, Miyoshi K, Nagao Y, Nishi Y, Ohtsuka M, Nakamura S, Sakurai T, Watanabe S. The combinational use of CRISPR/Cas9-based gene editing and targeted toxin technology enables efficient biallelic knockout of the alpha-1,3-galactosyltransferase gene in porcine embryonic fibroblasts. Xenotransplantation. 2014;21:291–300.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Cong L, Zhang F. Genome engineering using CRISPR-Cas9 system. Methods Mol Biol. 2015;1239:197–217.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Hsu PD, Lander ES, Zhang F. Development and applications of CRISPR-Cas9 for genome engineering. Cell. 2014;157:1262–78.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Thompson MR, Kaminski JJ, Kurt-Jones EA, Fitzgerald KA. Pattern recognition receptors and the innate immune response to viral infection. Viruses. 2011;3:920–40.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Chow KT, Gale M, Loo YM. RIG-I and other RNA sensors in antiviral immunity. Annu Rev Immunol. 2018;36:667–94.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Iwasaki A. A virological view of innate immune recognition. Annu Rev Microbiol. 2012;66:177–96.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Godde JS, Bickerton A. The Repetitive DNA Elements Called CRISPRs and Their Associated Genes:Evidence of Horizontal Transfer Among Prokaryotes. J Mol Evol. 2006;62:718–29.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Goubau D, Deddouche S, Reis e Sousa C. Cytosolic sensing of viruses. Immunity. 2013;38:855–69.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Jorgensen SE, Christiansen M, Ryo LB, Gad HH, Gjedsted J, Staeheli P, Mikkelsen JG, Storgaard M, Hartmann R, Mogensen TH. Defective RNA sensing by RIG-I in severe influenza virus infection. Clin Exp Immunol. 2018;192:366–76.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Sun Y, Ding N, Ding SS, Yu S, Meng C, Chen H, Qiu X, Zhang S, Yu Y, Zhan Y, Ding C. Goose RIG-I functions in innate immunity against Newcastle disease virus infections. Mol Immunol. 2013;53:321–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Spiropoulou CF, Ranjan P, Pearce MB, Sealy TK, Albarino CG, Gangappa S, Fujita T, Rollin PE, Nichol ST, Ksiazek TG, Sambhara S. RIG-I activation inhibits ebolavirus replication. Virology. 2009;392:11–5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Loo YM, Fornek J, Crochet N, Bajwa G, Perwitasari O, Martinez-Sobrido L, Akira S, Gill MA, Garcia-Sastre A, Katze MG, Gale M Jr. Distinct RIG-I and MDA5 signaling by RNA viruses in innate immunity. J Virol. 2008;82:335–45.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Grubman MJ, Baxt B. Foot-and-mouth disease. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2004;17:465–93.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Feng Q, Hato SV, Langereis MA, Zoll J, Virgen-Slane R, Peisley A, Hur S, Semler BL, van Rij RP, van Kuppeveld FJM. MDA5 detects the double-stranded RNA replicative form in picornavirus-infected cells. Cell Rep. 2012;2:1187–96.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Zhu Z, Yang F, Chen P, Liu H, Cao W, Zhang K, Liu X, Zheng H. Emergence of novel Seneca Valley virus strains in China, 2017. Transbound Emerg Dis. 2017;64:1024–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Zhu Z, Li C, Du X, Wang G, Cao W, Yang F, Feng H, Zhang X, Shi Z, Liu H, et al. Foot-and-mouth disease virus infection inhibits LGP2 protein expression to exaggerate inflammatory response and promote viral replication. Cell Death Dis. 2017;8:e2747.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Reed LJ, Muench H. A SIMPLE METHOD OF ESTIMATING FIFTY PER CENT ENDPOINTS. Amjhyg. 1938;27.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. REED LJ. MUENCH H: a simple method of estimating fifty percent endpoint. Am J Epidemiol. 1938;27:493–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Li W, Zhu Z, Cao W, Yang F, Zhang X, Li D, Zhang K, Li P, Mao R, Liu X, Zheng H. Esterase D enhances type I interferon signal transduction to suppress foot-and-mouth disease virus replication. Mol Immunol. 2016;75:112–21.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Garcin D, Latorre P, Kolakofsky D. Sendai virus C proteins counteract the interferon-mediated induction of an antiviral state. J Virol. 1999;73:6559–65.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Ishida N, Homma M. Sendai virus. Adv Virus Res. 1978;23:349–83.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Nagai Y, Takakura A, Irie T, Yonemitsu Y, Gotoh B: Sendai virus: evolution from mouse pathogen to a state-of-the-art tool in virus research and Biotechnology 2011.Google Scholar
  30. Zou Y, Li Z, Zou Y, Hao H, Li N, Li Q. An FBXO40 knockout generated by CRISPR/Cas9 causes muscle hypertrophy in pigs without detectable pathological effects. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2018;498:940–5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Su X, Cui K, Du S, Li H, Lu F, Shi D, Liu Q. Efficient genome editing in cultured cells and embryos of Debao pig and swamp buffalo using the CRISPR/Cas9 system. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim. 2018;54:375–83.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Sheets TP, Park KE, Park CH, Swift SM, Powell A, Donovan DM, Telugu BP. Targeted mutation of NGN3 gene disrupts pancreatic endocrine cell development in pigs. Sci Rep. 2018;8:3582.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Li M, Ouyang H, Yuan H, Li J, Xie Z, Wang K, Yu T, Liu M, Chen X, Tang X, et al. Site-specific Fat-1 Knock-in enables significant decrease of n-6PUFAs/n-3PUFAs ratio in pigs. G3 (Bethesda). 2018;8:1747–54.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Burkard C, Lillico SG: Precision engineering for PRRSV resistance in pigs: Macrophages from genome edited pigs lacking CD163 SRCR5 domain are fully resistant to both PRRSV genotypes while maintaining biological function. 2017, 13:e1006206.Google Scholar
  35. Shuai K, Liu B. Regulation of JAK-STAT signalling in the immune system. Nat Rev Immunol. 2003;3:900–11.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Sadler AJ, Williams BR. Interferon-inducible antiviral effectors. Nat Rev Immunol. 2008;8:559–68.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Liu Y, Goulet ML, Sze A, Hadj SB, Belgnaoui SM, Lababidi RR, Zheng C, Fritz JH, Olagnier D, Lin R. RIG-I-mediated STING upregulation restricts herpes simplex virus 1 infection. J Virol. 2016;90:9406–19.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Wang Y, Zhang HX, Sun YP, Liu ZX, Liu XS, Wang L, Lu SY, Kong H, Liu QL, Li XH, et al. Rig-I−/− mice develop colitis associated with downregulation of G alpha i2. Cell Res. 2007;17:858–68.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Su C, Zhan G, Zheng C. Evasion of host antiviral innate immunity by HSV-1, an update. Virol J. 2016;13:38.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Hales LM, Jones BH, Vasko AJ, Knowles NJ, Police SR, Hallenbeck PL. EPIDEMIOLOGY of Seneca Valley virus (SVV-001), a novel oncolytic picornavirus for the systemic treatment of patients with solid cancers with neuroendocrine features. Mol Ther. 2006;13:S187.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Sun D, Vannucci F, Knutson TP, Corzo C, Marthaler DG. Emergence and whole-genome sequence of Senecavirus a in Colombia. Transbound Emerg Dis. 2017;64:1346–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Saeng-Chuto K, Rodtian P, Temeeyasen G, Wegner M, Nilubol D. The first detection of Senecavirus a in pigs in Thailand, 2016. Transbound Emerg Dis. 2018;65:285–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Yang F, Zhu Z, Cao W, Liu H, Zhang K, Tian H, Liu X, Zheng H. Immunogenicity and protective efficacy of an inactivated cell culture-derived Seneca Valley virus vaccine in pigs. Vaccine. 2018;36:841–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2018

Advertisement