Open Access

Ecogenomic survey of plant viruses infecting Tobacco by Next generation sequencing

  • Ibukun A. Akinyemi1,
  • Fang Wang2,
  • Benguo Zhou2,
  • Shuishui Qi1 and
  • Qingfa Wu1Email author
Contributed equally
Virology Journal201613:181

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12985-016-0639-7

Received: 4 August 2016

Accepted: 18 October 2016

Published: 4 November 2016

Abstract

Background

The invasion of plant by viruses cause major damage to plants and reduces crop yield and integrity. Devastating plant virus infection has been experienced at different times all over the world, which are attributed to different events of mutation, re-assortment and recombination occurring in the viruses. Strategies for proper virus management has been mostly limited to eradicating the vectors that spreads the plant viruses. However, development of prompt and effective diagnostic methods are required to monitor emerging and re-emerging diseases that may be symptomatic or asymptomatic in the plant as well as the genetic variation and evolution in the plant viruses. A survey of plant viruses infecting field-grown Tobacco crop was conducted in Anhui Province of China by the deep sequencing of sRNAs.

Methods

Survey of plant viruses infecting Tobacco was carried based on 104 samples collected across the province. Nine different sRNA libraries was prepared and custom-made bioinformatics pipeline coupled with molecular techniques was developed to sequence, assemble and analyze the siRNAs for plant virus discovery. We also carried out phylogenetic and recombination analysis of the identified viruses.

Results

Twenty two isolates from eight different virus species including Cucumber mosaic virus, Potato virus Y, Tobacco mosaic virus, Tobacco vein banding Mosaic virus, Pepper mottle virus, Brassica yellow virus, Chilli venial mottle virus, Broad bean wilt virus 2 were identified in tobacco across the survey area. The near-complete genome sequence of the 22 new isolates were determined and analyzed. The isolates were grouped together with known strains in the phylogenetic tree. Molecular variation in the isolates indicated the conserved coding regions have majorly a nucleotide sequence identity of 80-94 % with previously identified isolates. Various events of recombination were discovered among some of the isolates indicating that two or more viruses or different isolates of one virus infect the same host cell.

Conclusion

This study describes the discovery of a consortium of plant viruses infecting Tobacco that are broadly distributed in Anhui province of China. It also demonstrates the effectiveness of NGS in identifying plant viruses without a prior knowledge of the virus and the genetic diversity that enhanced mixed infection.

Keywords

sRNA Bioinformatics Assembly Next generation sequencing Plant virus

Background

Viruses are ubiquitous and affects plant growth and yield. Over the years, crop losses due to viral infection have been very devastating and are of great concern especially in developed and developing countries [1]. The unrestricted distribution of plant diseases and emerging infectious disease poses serious threat to food sustenance. A high percentage of this loss is caused by viruses because of their abundant presence in most environments among the biological entities [2]. Early identification of these plant pathogens remains the focal point in the field of virology, aimed at preventing the spread of the viruses as well as developing ways of combating and reducing their effects on agricultural yield.

RNA viruses exists within host as a consortium of un-identical but similar sequences due to their inability to propagate without a living host, high mutation and recombination rates, referred to as viral quasispecies [3]. RNA silencing is one of the defense mechanisms of plant against viruses, in which the double stranded RNA (dsRNA) serves as a substrates for Dicer-like ribonuclease (DCL) to produce small-interfering RNAs (siRNAs) of between 21 to 25 nt [4]. Viral infection of plants involves the production of viral small RNAs (vsRNAs) and the plant host interacts with invading viruses by developing various cellular mechanisms. Viruses are both inducers and targets of RNAi [5]. Double stranded RNA intermediates are produced by viral genomes during replication which serves as substrates for Dicer-like ribonucleases and cleaves into small virus derived siRNAs (viRNAs), and binds with the Argonaut protein (Ago) to form the RISC complex [6].

The advent of new sophisticated technologies for parallel sequencing had increased our understanding of viral genome variability and evolution within the host and virus defense mechanism in plants. It is widely accepted that studies of viral abundance and diversity will lead and have led to novel insights into the functioning of the microbial biosphere. The relative abundance of a virus (or viral nucleic acid) in a sample, compared to that of other organisms such as bacteria or host cells (or their genomes), is a critical factor for the discovery of viruses when using metagenomics. Unlike traditional virus detection methods e.g., enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), polymerase chain reaction (PCR), or microarray which depends on prior knowledge of antibody or sequence of the potential virus [7] as well as determining the existence of novel viral agents [8, 9], the use of next generation sequencing technology (NGS) provides a powerful method for determining the causative pathogen without the prior knowledge of the disease pathogen. The genome of plant viruses can be rapidly determined even when occurring at extremely low titers in the infected host. The detection of both DNA and RNA viruses [10] has been made possible by the reconstruction of partial or complete viral genomes [11] and sequencing of the accumulated 21–24 nt virus-derived siRNAs generated by Dicer enzymes upon recognition of viral dsRNA. With the development of NGS technology and its relatively low cost, NGS has widen understanding and its potentials of diagnostics of viral pathogens without a priori knowledge of the invading pathogen, which provide accurate and timely detection of these viral pathogens in plant for effective disease management and control. Consequently, it is necessary to conduct an accurate and timely detection of these viral pathogens in plant for effective disease management and control.

Tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) is an important economic crop worldwide, with half of the world’s tobacco farmers in China and the world’s largest producer [12], ahead of countries such as India, Zimbabwe, Indonesia, Turkey, Bangladesh, Egypt, Philippine and Thailand. The production and yield of tobacco have been seriously affected by the invasion of emerging and recurrent plant viruses with symptoms such as venial necrosis, mosaic, mottling, yellowing, ring spots, stunting, shoestring and deformation [1316]. Anhui province is in the center of China and surrounded by six other provinces. The typical geographical feature of this area is enriched with geochemical elements suitable for the flourishing of Tobacco plant [17]. The tobacco plantation is usually surrounded or mixed with other crops, as mixed system of farming is commonly adopted in these areas. These however, had enhanced the transmission of plant virus from one plant to the other and consequently made Anhui province an idealistic open ecosystem to investigate the viruses infecting the crop in the province. In order to identify the etiological agents of the different disease symptoms observed in different Tobacco plantation across Anhui province, we used next generation sequencing of small RNAs to identify viruses from symptomatic Tobacco plants in farm fields. We also present the results of genome comparison between the resulting 22 isolates and genomes retrieved from GenBank. This study provides census of viral population and distribution in different ecosystem or cropping system through the characterization, discovery and molecular interaction of plant viruses. We also described the recombination events that occurred in the isolates and a bioinformatics pipeline that explores the siRNA generated in response to viral invasion and other molecular biology methods employed to discover a consortium of viruses infecting tobacco.

Results

Sequence data

One hundred and four symptomatic leaf samples of tobacco were collected from farm fields and pooled into 9 combinations based on the location of sample collected. Nine individual sRNA libraries were constructed and sequenced on an Illumina HiSeq-2000 platform which generated between 38 and 49 million raw reads. Adapters and low quality reads were trimmed to obtain between 32 and 45 million clean reads with lengths of 18–30 nt (Tables 1). The most abundant class of viral derived small RNAs were 21–24 nt in length, with a peak of 24 nt for all samples (Additional file 1: Figure S1). Similar length distribution of sRNA were observed in all the libraries (Additional file 1: Figure S2a,b,c).
Table 1

Description of Next generation sequencing data from one hundred and four samples

Library Source (City)

Library Name

No of Samples

Raw Reads

Clean reads

Unique Seq

No of Contigs Assembled by Velvet (k = 17)

Xuancheng

Xch 1

14

44,729,605

38,973,127

7,051,733

7952

Xch 2

11

49,938,373

45,290,836

7,131,823

7038

Xuancheng/Wuhu

Xch-Wh

5

38,747,172

34,282,436

5,985,886

6346

Dongzhi/Qingyang

Dzh-Qyg

11

43,827,189

38,882,338

6,522,149

6776

Bozhou

Bzh 1

17

45,974,903

39,218,493

7,582,592

8133

Bzh 2

11

41,574,669

36,303,201

7,641,767

8981

Bzh 3

9

43,324,495

37,668,456

6,579,416

7388

Bzh 4

8

41,720,630

37,414,819

6,770,175

8011

Bzh 5

18

38,277,531

32,358,941

6,088,147

6698

Virus identification

The homology-dependent approach for plant virus discovery was employed for the analysis, using a custom-made pipeline (Fig. 1). The clean reads of each library were assembled into contigs with Velvet [18] and Oases [19]. The number of contigs produced were 6346–8981 (Table 1) based on the de-bruijn graph algorithm (k -mer 17), with the longest single contig length of 2,255 nt. GC content of the assembled contigs ranges between 43 and 45 %. These contigs were searched against the non-redundant nucleotide sequence entries of the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) database by BLASTn with e-value of 10−3. Stringent parameters of ≥ 90 % identity and coverage identified 554 contigs hit distantly related to sequences in the database at nucleotide and protein level (Table 2). Related reference genome sequences were used to determine the relative positions and orientation of these final contigs. Subsequently, RT-PCR was performed to obtain the near-complete genome sequence of all the isolates using primers designed based on the final contigs. The genome sequence of identified viruses from all the libraries have high nucleotide sequence identity with respective matching genome from the Genbank database (Table 3). BLASTn search of the full-length nucleotide sequence against the database indicated the assembled genomes from the libraries have significant similarities to viruses belonging to Cucumovirus, Tobamovirus, Polerovirus and Potyvirus of the Family Bromoviridae, Virgaviridae, Luteoviridae and Potyviridae respectively (Table 3). Specifically, 8 different virus species were identified which includes Cucumber mosaic virus (CMV), Potato virus Y (PVY), Tobacco mosaic virus (TMV), Tobacco vein banding Mosaic virus (TVBMV), Pepper mottle virus (PeMV), Brassica yellow virus, Chilli venial mottle virus (CVMV), Broad bean wilt virus 2 (BBWV) infecting tobacco across the survey area. In order to gain insight into the host RNA silencing mechanism induced by the invading viruses, analysis of the sequences characterized by Bowtie [20] allowing no mismatch showed an equal distribution of siRNAs along the genome of the new virus while no excess of (+) over (−) siRNAs (Additional file 1: Figure S3) but revealed a peak of 22 and 24 nts in the genome sequence. The genome sequence of the 22 isolates from this study has been deposited at the GenBank database under the accession number KX650847-KX650868.
Fig. 1

Schematic representation of virus detection and discovery pipeline using next generation sequencing

Table 2

Analysis of the assembled contigs against sequences in the NCBI database, using a highly homology sequence search

Library Source

Library Name

Viruses

No of contigs identical to Blastn

Size (nt)

G + C %

Mapped Organism

Relative (ref Seq)

Xuancheng

Xch 1

CMV-Xch-1

43

2874

45.95

Cucumber Mosaic Virus

3357

  

PVY-Xch-1

20

9292

42.53

Potato Virus Y

9704

  

PeMV-Xch

14

9632

43.42

Pepper Mottle Virus

9640

 

Xch 2

CMV-Xch-2

24

2922

44.92

Cucumber Mosaic Virus

3357

  

TMV-Xch-2

23

4679

42.87

Tobacco Mosaic Virus

6395

Xuancheng/Wuhu

Xch-Wh

CMV-Xch-Wh

5

3102

45.34

Cucumber Mosaic Virus

3357

  

PVY-Xch-Wh

14

9302

42.02

Potato Virus Y

9704

  

BrYV-Xch-Wh

12

3494

42.86

Brassica Yellow Virus

5666

  

TMV-Xch-Wh

31

5808

43.10

Tobacco Mosaic Virus

6395

Dongzhi/Qingyang

Dzh-Qyg

TMV-Dzh-Qyg

33

5571

43.10

Tobacco Mosaic Virus

6395

  

CVMV-Dzh-Qyg

20

9499

41.08

Chilli venial mottle virus

9711

Bozhou

Bzh-1

PVY-Bzh-1

21

8826

42.18

Potato Virus Y

9704

 

Bzh-2

CMV-Bzh-2

29

2786

38.42

Cucumber Mosaic Virus

3357

 

Bzh-3

PVY-Bzh-3

34

9560

42.46

Potato Virus Y

9704

  

CMV-Bzh-3

18

2754

45.51

Cucumber Mosaic Virus

3357

  

TvBMV-Bzh-3

41

9148

42.15

Tobacco Vein Banding Mosaic virus

9570

 

Bzh-4

PVY-Bzh-4

37

9412

42.11

Potato Virus Y

9704

  

CMV-Bzh-4

16

2836

45.89

Cucumber Mosaic Virus

3357

  

TvBMV-Bzh-4

31

9449

42..12

Tobacco Vein Banding Mosaic virus

9570

 

Bzh-5

CMV-Bzh-5

24

2967

46.22

Cucumber Mosaic Virus

3357

  

BBWV2-Bzh-5

29

3106

43.59

Broad Bean Wilt Virus 2

3607

  

TvBMV-Bzh-5

35

9312

41.97

Tobacco Vein Banding Mosaic virus

9570

  

Total=

554

    

Note: Reference used were retrieved from the NCBI database Cucumber mosaic virus (NC_002034.1), Potato virus Y(NC_001616.1), Tobacco mosaic virus(NC_001367.1), Tobacco vein banding Mosaic virus(NC_009994.1), Pepper mottle virus(NC_001517.1), Brassica yellow virus(NC_016038.1), Chilli venial mottle virus(NC_005778.1), Broad bean wilt virus 2(NC_003004.1)

Table 3

Percentage nucleotide identity of identified viruses in each library to reference genome from NCBI database

Virus Identified

Xch 1

Xch 2

Xch-Wh

Dzh-Qyg

Bzh 1

Bzh 2

Bzh 3

Bzh 4

Bzh 5

Cucumber mosaic virus

77.34

77.58

84.63

62.64

75.07

77.95

80.25

Potato virus Y

89.15

84.78

81.67

83.88

88.00

Tobacco Mosaic virus

72.06

89.31

86.11

Tobacco Vein Banding Mosaic virus

87.06

89.40

88.61

Pepper Mottle Virus

94.18

Chilli venial mottle virus

78.70

Brassica Yellow Virus

52.97

Broad Bean Wilt Virus 2

72.48

–: Not available

Genome properties

The single protein gene 1a responsible for viral replication was predicted in the CMV isolates Xch-1, Xch-2, Xch-Wh, Bzh-2, Bzh-3, Bzh-4, Bzh-5 (accession number KX650847, KX650848, KX650849, KX650850, KX650851, KX650852, KX650853 respectively) by the ORF Finder. The gene is a major virulence factor of the cucumber mosaic virus (CMV) and its essential for replication of the viral genome [21]. The ORF 1a encodes 993 amino acids (aa) protein, known to be involved in replication. The conserved domain of the putative ORF 1a-encoded protein of the CMV isolates are also found in association with two enzymatic motifs: viral methyl transferase and viral helicase consistent with other cucumoviruses [22]. Also, a large ORF 1a of the CMV isolates encoded the virus replicase protein of between 533 and 933 amino acids (aa) with an estimated molecular mass of ~ 45–112 kDa consistent with other cucumoviruses. The 7 isolates of the CMV have high nucleotide similarity with the reference genome of isolate Fny (D00356). CMV-Xch-1 (KX650847) shares 79 % nucleotide sequence identity with CMV-Ix isolate from the Philippines (U202201), while CMV-Bzh-4 (KX650852) had 80 % identity with the CMV-SD isolate (AF071551) from China.

The PVY isolates contain a single large ORF predicted by ORF Finder, consistent with other members of the potyvirus. The ORF of PVY-Xch-1, PVY-Xch-Wh, PVY-Bzh-1 isolates (accession number KX650858, KX650859, KX650860) are 166–7,362, 2,568–9,095 and 2,723–8,824 nt and encodes a polyprotein of 2,398, 2,175 and 2,033 aa with an estimated molecular mass of ~ 272, 248 and 231 kDa respectively. Comparison of PVY isolates polyprotein aa sequence with those of other PVY strains showed the presence of nine predicted cleavage sites, generating ten mature proteins (P1, HC-Pro, P3, 6 K1, CI, 6 K2, Vpg, NIa-Pro, NIb, and CP) after processing by virus-encoded proteases [23]. PVY-Bzh-1 (KX650860) has 90 % nucleotide identity with isolate PVY-Guiding-3 (HM590405), representing an a close similarity between the sequences. The ORF predicted in pepper mottle virus (PeMV-Xch) isolate (KX650857) reveals a single long polyprotein between 2,423 and 7,345 nt, also typical of potyviruses of the family Potyviridae [24]. PeMv-Xch encodes 1,640 aa, estimated to have a molecular weight of 186 kDa. This share 94 % nucleotide identity with the isolate (NC_001517.1) from USA.

Three isolates were identified to be Tobacco mosaic virus from samples collected in Xuancheng, Dongzhi, Qingyang and Bozhou. TMV has two replication-related genomic protein segment of 126 and 183 kDa, 30-kDa movement protein (MP) and a 17.5-kDa coat protein (CP). TMV-Xch-2 (KX650854) isolate encodes replicase protein between the 3 and 4,127 nt, and a movement protein encoded between 4,111 and 4,677 nt. Also the replicase and movement protein of TMV-Dzh-Qyg (KX650856) isolate are encoded between 144 and 4,585 nt and 4,569–5,375 nt respectively. TMV-Xch-Wh (KX650855) however has additional coat protein encoded between 5,410–5,808 nt expressed from a second subgenomic RNA [25].

Phylogenetic analysis of Isolates

The identified near-complete nucleotide sequences in this study, other previously identified isolates as well as major strains of species with large group members were retrieved from the GenBank database and used to determine the phylogenetic relationships between the isolates and members of the same genus. This is important to understand plant virus evolution and events such as recombination and reassortment that are major evolutionary force in virus population [26]. Neighbor-joining phylogenetic analysis based on full-length viral genomes was performed with a bootstrap of 1000 replications. The genomic sequence of the 7 CMV isolates (Table 2) shared a single 1a gene of between 80 and 95 % identity with other isolates. The isolates were grouped into clusters according to the sequences of the closest relatives in the genus (Fig. 2). All the selected sequences of the cucumoviruses and identified isolates were well separated into three subgroups (IA, IB and II). The new cucumber mosaic virus isolates from Anhui province, China formed clusters with some proven standard isolates that were taken as reference isolates for each subgroup such as isolates Fny, MF and Y for subgroup IA; isolates CTL, NT9, SD and TFN for subgroup IB; isolates LY, Q, S and Trk7 for subgroup II, which are consistent with previous studies [22, 27]. The divergence of subgroups I and II is clearly seen in the 1a phylogeny estimation (Fig. 2); however, further divergence of subgroup I into IA and IB is not obvious but indicates an evolutionary history that is quite different from what is seen in the other RNAs. The 87.24 % sequence identity of isolate CMV-Xch-1 (KX650847) and CMV-Xch-2 (KX650848) formed the same cluster in the subgroup 1b while the CMV-Bzh-3 (KX650851) and CMV-Bzh-5 (KX650853) isolates from different county in Bozhou form separate cluster with 90 % nucleotide identity in the same subgroup. However, the CMV-Bzh-4 (KX650852) had 90.12 % identity with the CMV-SD (AF071551.1) isolate while CMV-Bzh-2 is the only isolate in the subgroup II, indicating that most isolates from the China survey are clustered in subgroup 1 (Fig. 2).
Fig. 2

Phylogenetic analyses of Cucumber mosaic virus Isolates and selected strains, with aligned nucleotide sequences, generated using the neighbor-joining method and MEGA6 software. The percentage of replicate trees in which the associated taxa clustered together in the bootstrap test (1000 replicates) is shown next to the branches. Peanut stunt virus ER RNA 1 was used as an out group for the tree construction

As for the Potyviruses, 5 isolates formed the same clade as the potato virus Y (NC_001616.1). The strains of Potato virus Y are divided into three groups (PVYC, PVYO, PVYN) [28, 29] and recombinant variants (PVYNTN) according to biological properties and genome sequence [30, 31]. PVY isolates Bzh-1 (KX650860), Bzh- 3 (KX650861), Bzh-4 (KX650862) and Xch-Wh (KX650859) clusters within the NTN group while the PVY-Xch-1 (KX650858) isolate falls within the PVY O strain group (Fig. 3). PVY-Xch-1 (KX650858) is closest to the PVY-Oz isolate (EF026074) from the USA with 90 % nucleotide identity. The PVY isolates have shown great ability to adapt to different changing environmental conditions throughout the world probably because of the genetically diverse populations of the RNA viruses [32]. Most PVY isolates are clustered in the PVYNTN subgroup which has been regarded as the group of recombinant variant of PVYN. This can be explained by a 94 % nucleotide identity shared between PVY-Bzh-1 and PVY Guiding. The development of new variants through mutation and recombination had foster global distribution of the isolates [33]. The phylogenetic analysis of the TMV isolates also confirms the redistribution of the plant viruses across borders. TMV-Xch-2 (KX650854) form cluster with the Pertunia isolate (AB369275) from South Korea while TMV-Xch-Wh (KX650855) is clustered with Shanxi (JF920727) also from China. However, TMV-Dzh-Qyg (KX650856) is rooted independently in the tree (Fig. 4) forming a branch leading to the clade but closest to the Pertunia and Shanxi isolates as well, sharing 85 % nucleotide identity respectively.
Fig. 3

Phylogenetic analyses of Potato virus Y isolates and selected strains, with aligned nucleotide sequences, generated using the neighbor-joining method and MEGA6 software. The percentage of replicate trees in which the associated taxa clustered together in the bootstrap test (1000 replicates) is shown next to the branches. The tree of the Potyvirus was rooted using Sunflower chlorotic mottle virus (SuCMoV) as an out group sequence for the phylogenetic analysis

The Chilli venial mottle virus isolate CVMV-Dzh-Qyg (KX650863) and PeMV-Xch (KX650857) identified in this study has 93 % and 94.18 % nucleotide identity with isolate Yp8 and PepMoVgp1 (NC_001517) respectively. The partial sequence of a Brassica yellow virus isolate BrYV-Xch-Wh clustered with the Brassica yellow virus (NC_016038.1) belonging to the genus Polerovirus. The analysis suggest that reassortment may have been a major event in the evolution of some of the strains and are derived from common recent ancestors that had passed through a bottleneck event. Phylogenetic analysis showed that, among the 22 isolates described worldwide, 14 Chinese isolates clustered together into an independent clade based on the near-complete genome nucleotide.

Recombination events

The major source of variability in RNA viruses are mutation, re-assortment and recombination [34] which can result in insertion of unrelated sequence elements, as well as exchange, duplication or deletion of existing viral sequence elements. Segmental recombination events of the isolates were analyzed based on at least four positive statistical methods implemented in the RDP4 program used for the analysis. Recombination breakpoints detected by the methods were recognized in the cucumovirus and potyvirus strains (Additional file 1: Figure S7a and b). Some of the new isolates were predicted to have experienced recombination events supported by at least four programs. The major parent of PVY-Xch-Wh (KX650859) is SCRI-O isolate from United Kingdom while the minor parent is LYE84.2 from Spain. Recombination analysis in other isolates such as the PVY-Bzh-3 (KX650861) detected that the major and minor parent is WA-13 quan (China) and NE-11 (USA) isolate respectively while the PVY-Bzh-3 isolate was determined to be a recombinant of PVY-Bzh-4 and PVY-Xch-Wh. Fewer break points were observed in the cucumber virus isolates. The LS strain and FNY (USA) are the major and minor parent for CMV-Bzh-2 (KX650850) while other isolates share their origin from the Ly strain from Australia (Additional file 1: Figure S7a).

Discussion

In spite of the different plant disease control mechanisms, plant virus still cause significant economic losses in tobacco production every year in China [14]. The effectiveness of disease control strategies can be affected by the genetic exchange and changes in composition of virus population [35]. Therefore, prompt identification of invading plant virus, elucidation of the molecular determinants and genetic diversities involved in pathogenesis is important to better understand plant–pathogen isolates. In this study, our goal was to survey tobacco plant in Anhui province of China for virus infection that caused devastating infection in the fields and also capture the genetic diversity and molecular variability of the different isolates identified across the province as well as determine the effectiveness of the application of next generation sequencing technology coupled with molecular techniques in discovery of plant viruses, without the prior knowledge of the virus.

We describe a bioinformatics pipeline to efficiently identify viruses in a mixed infection of tobacco and to differentiate different strains infecting the plant across the province. The bioinformatics method is based on the deep sequencing and de novo assembly of siRNAs. The assembled contigs generated from nine sRNA libraries were analyzed for the identification of the viruses associated with Tobacco. We determined the genome sequences of 22 isolates of plant viruses infecting tobacco collected from various regions across Anhui Province of China and validated through RT-PCR and Sanger sequencing. These identified viruses consist of 7 isolates of Cucumber Mosaic Virus, 5 isolates of Potato Virus Y, 3 isolates of Tobacco Mosaic Virus, 3 isolates of Tobacco Vein Banding Mosaic Virus, 1 isolate each of Pepper Mottle Virus, Brassica Yellow Virus, Chilli venial mottle virus, Broad Bean Wilt Virus 2 infecting Tobacco, a crop plant of paramount economic value. There are more isolates of CMV and PVY infecting Tobacco, compared to other identified isolates. This can be attributed to the diversity of the isolates [36] which has been reported in other parts of the world to be a serious concern to crop production.

Sequencing of the libraries of small RNA isolated from infected leaves shed more light on the consortium of replicating virus in the plant sample and proved decisive for the identification of the novel isolates [7, 9]. De novo assembly of the siRNA and BLAST search of assembled contigs to the non-redundant nucleotide and protein database identified virus sequence with more than 90 % similarity. To elucidate the molecular and genetic diversity of the isolates in Anhui province of China, we analyzed the isolates and sequences of previously reported recombinant and non-recombinant isolates [3638] retrieved from the GenBank. Some of the isolates had experienced various recombination events which are similar to other strains from other parts of the world. They were clustered in the same subgroup with other strains of viruses prevalent in other parts of the world [36, 38, 39]. The CMV isolates identified in this study showed that subgroup I is of greater prevalence than subgroup II in China. The detected several subgroup IB isolates among historic CMV isolates and phylogenetic analysis further revealed presence of this specific subgroup in other parts of the world [31]. PVY is also considered as one of the most dangerous plant virus with different strains causing about 80 % of plant losses [23] which are dependent on infecting strains, time of infection and co-infecting species. The recombination events in plants plays a critical role in the virulence of plant viruses by generating genetic variation and producing new viruses [40]. The designation of PVY strain groups is based on the biological differences of the PVY strains to overcome resistance genes in tobacco and also allow the invasion of other plant viruses by suppressing the immune response of the plant at different strain groups.

Viral evolution and host adaptation are best understood by examining the role of recombination in generating and eliminating variation in viral sequences. RNA viral replicates, apparently lack proof-reading ability and as a consequence, the frequency of mutations is much higher than in organisms with a DNA genome [41]. The recombination events in some of the isolates are as a result of mutation and genetic reassortment which has been previously reported in other isolates [36, 42, 43].

The coverage, dispersal and complexity of virus population detected in this study, calls for a need for a constant survey of not only symptomatic crops but also other crops used in mixed cropping, and proper monitoring of disease spread and efficient management. Also a fast and efficient detection method, as the Next generation sequencing that do not need a prior knowledge of the virus should be employed to identify viruses. Deep sequencing, bioinformatics and phylogenetic analysis, as well as comparison of the different virus species identified in Tobacco presents an important revelation of molecular variability of viruses causing devastating effects on the crop. Furthermore the proliferation of new genetic types signals a high risk for crops that must be addressed with efficient viral control and diagnostic methods.

Conclusion

In this study we describe the discovery of a consortium of plant viruses infecting Tobacco that are broadly distributed in Anhui province of China. We further characterized the genome of the 22 isolates, its variability and the siRNAs induced in tobacco plant in response to virus infection. Our result showed the effectiveness of the custom made bioinformatics pipeline coupled with molecular techniques and phylogenetic analysis, in diagnostics and identification of plant virus. Survey of plant viruses and prompt diagnostics should be frequently carried out in areas known for large cultivation of economically important crops.

Methods

Collection and preparation of samples

A field survey of the potential viral pathogens of Tobacco was conducted across farm fields in Anhui Province of China (Fig. 5a). One hundred and four symptomatic (mosaic, mottling, yellowing, ring spots, stunting, Shoestring and deformation)(Fig. 5b) leaf samples of cultivated Tobacco (Nicotina tobaccum) were collected from different regions (Xuancheng, Wuhu, Dongzhi, Qingyang, Bozhou) of Anhui province. (Tables 1). Leaf samples were immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80 °C until RNA extraction.
Fig. 4

Phylogenetic analyses of Tobacco mosaic virus isolates and selected strains, with aligned nucleotide sequences, generated using the neighbor-joining method and MEGA6 software. The percentage of replicate trees in which the associated taxa clustered together in the bootstrap test (1000 replicates) is shown next to the branches. The tree was rooted using Odontoglossum ring spot virus (ORSV) as an out group sequence for the phylogenetic analysis

Fig. 5

a Sampling areas of infected tobacco plants in Anhui Province of China. b Typical view representation of yellow mosaic mosaic, stunting, Shoestring and deformation symptom of the overall Tobacco leaf samples collected across Anhui Province

Preparation of total RNA, small RNA library construction and sequencing

Total RNA was extracted from leaf samples as earlier described [16]. Briefly, the frozen leaves of symptomatic samples were pulverized in liquid nitrogen and suspended in 1.5 ml tube containing extraction buffer (50 mM Tris–HCl, pH 8.0; 150 mM LiCl; 5 mM EDTA, pH 8.0; 5 % SDS, 5 % PVP). The supernatant was treated with 2.5 M Potassium Acetate (pH 4.8) followed by Chloroform : isoamyl alcohol (24:1 v/v). The pellets were washed in 70 % ethanol, air dried and re-suspended in nuclease-free water. Integrity of the RNA was verified in ethidium-bromide stained 1.2 % agarose gels after electrophoresis, and purity was assessed by measuring the absorbance ratio (1.8–2.0) at A260/A280 nm using a Eppendorf BioPhotometer Plus (Germany). Total RNA from symptomatic leaf samples were pooled for small RNA library construction based on the site of collection as previously described [44] and deep sequencing was performed on an Illumina HiSeq-2000 sequencing platform (BGI-ShenZhen, China) using the manufacturer’s instruction for sequencing.

Bioinformatics analysis

The sRNA sequence processing, assembly, and virus genome identification were conducted using a custom bioinformatics pipeline (Fig. 2). Briefly, quality of the raw Illumina sRNA reads were screened using the fastqc (http://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc) and the adapter sequence trimmed with the Cutadapt software (version 1.3) (https://cutadapt.readthedocs.io/en/stable/). Low quality reads were cleaned with an in-house Perl script. Trimmed sRNA sequences shorter than 18 nt and longer than 30 nt were discarded. The clean sRNAs reads from each sample were assembled de novo into contigs based on De Bruijin graphs with a k-mer length of 17 using Velvet [18] and Oases program downloaded from the European Bioinformatics Institute (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/~zerbino/oases/). The assembled contigs were used to query the non-redundant GenBank nucleotide and protein databases, respectively, using the BLAST program [45]. Highest hits having ≥ 90 % coverage and identity with the nucleotide sequences in the non-redundant NCBI database were extracted for further analysis using BLASTn (e-value cutoff: 10−3). Furthermore, they were filtered and searched against the non-redundant protein database of NCBI by BLASTx and tblastx to compare the homology, as short sequences may lead to false positive results [46]. Final hits with nucleic acid and protein coverage ≥ 90 % and identity ≥ 90 % transcription of the virus were identified and aligned to references in order to determine their orientation and positions. The small RNAs of the hits were mapped to the to the closest distantly related viral genome with Bowtie [20] to determine the distribution and abundance of the sRNA.

RT-PCR, cloning, full-length genome amplification, and sequencing

Reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR) was performed using primers (Table S1) designed from sequences of specific assembled contigs to bridge the gaps between them, so as to obtain the near-complete genome sequences. The PCR product segments were electrophoresed in 1.0 % agarose gels, bands were excised and purified using the SanPrep Gel Extraction Kit (Sangon Biotech, China). The amplification products were ligated to pMD18-T vector (Takara Biotechnology Co., Ltd), transformed into Escherichia coli DH5α and positive clones were sequenced. Two clones from independent PCR reactions products were sequenced twice on both strands for each amplified fragment through the conventional Sanger dideoxy sequencing.

Phylogenetic analysis

ORFs were predicted using ORF Finder. Conserved domains/motifs were analyzed using SMART [12]. The new sequences were aligned with other sequences retrieved from the GenBank with Mafft [47] and phylogenetic analyses were conducted using the neighbor-joining method by MEGA6 [48], with the bootstrap of 1000 replicates [49]. Maximum likelihood resulted in similar phylogenetic trees. Other isolates were retrieved from the GenBank database for the phylogenetic analysis. Origin and accession number of the isolates are listed in the Additional file 2: Table S2, S3 and S4.

Recombination analysis

The putative recombination events among the isolates and genus member were evaluated using the Recombination Detection Program v.4.66 (RDP4) [50] made up of different methods namely recombination detection program (RDP), statistical tests for detecting gene conversion (GENECONV) [51], BOOTSCAN [52], MaxiChi [53], Chimera [54], SiScan [55], and 3SEQ [56], implemented in the RDP Beta 4.66 program. Alignments of nucleotide sequences produced in Mafft [47] and MEGA6 [48] were used in RDP4 with the default settings (0.05 p-value cut-off). Recombination events were considered as significant if more than four algorithms had a consensus P-value ≤ 0.01, in addition to phylogenetic evidence of recombination. Otherwise, they were regarded as ‘tentative’ recombination events [57].

Abbreviations

Ago: 

Argonaut protein

BBWV: 

Broad bean wilt virus 2

BrYV: 

Brassica yellow virus

CMV: 

Cucumber mosaic virus

CVMV: 

Chilli venial mottle virus

DCL: 

Dicer-like ribonuclease

dsRNA: 

double stranded RNA

ELISA: 

Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay

NGS: 

Next Generation Sequencing

PCR: 

Polymerase chain reaction

PeMV: 

Pepper mottle virus

PVY: 

Potato virus Y

RISC: 

RNA-induced silencing complex

siRNAs: 

small-interfering RNAs

TMV: 

Tobacco mosaic virus

TVBMV: 

Tobacco vein banding Mosaic virus

vsRNAs: 

viral small RNAs

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by grants from the Chinese National Natural Science Foundation (no. 31272011), Key Program of Anhui Province Tobacco Monopoly Administration (no. 20150551007) and Natural Science Foundation of Anhui Province NO.1608085QC59. We will like to thank the support of Chinese Academy of Science - The World Academy of Science (CAS-TWAS) PhD President’s Fellowship to Ibukun A. Akinyemi. The funders played no role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Availability of data and materials

The genome sequence of the 22 virus isolates identified in this study have been deposited in GenBank and allocated the accession numbers of KX650847-KX650868.

Authors’ contributions

QW conceived the study and designed the project. BZ and FW collected the samples. IAA, FW, BZ and SQ conducted the experiments. IAA carried out the bioinformatics analysis. IAA and QW analyzed the data, wrote and revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
School of Life Sciences, University of Science and Technology of China
(2)
Tobacco Research Institute, Anhui Academy of Agricultural Sciences

References

  1. Nicaise V. Crop immunity against viruses: outcomes and future challenges. Front Plant Sci. 2014;5:660.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Adriaenssens EM, Cowan DA. Using signature genes as tools to assess environmental viral ecology and diversity. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2014;80:4470–80.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Domingo E, Sheldon J, Perales C. Viral quasispecies evolution. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2012;76:159–216.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Brodersen P, Voinnet O. The diversity of RNA silencing pathways in plants. Trends Genet. 2006;22:268–80.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Covey SN, AlKaff NS, Langara A, Turner DS. Plants combat infection by gene silencing. Nature. 1997;385:781–2.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Roy A, Shao J. A case study on discovery of novel citrus leprosis virus cytoplasmic type 2 utilizing small RNA libraries by next generation sequencing and bioinformatic analyses. Journal of Data Mining in Genomics & Proteomics. 2013;04.Google Scholar
  7. Wu Q, Ding SW, Zhang Y, Zhu S. Identification of viruses and viroids by next-generation sequencing and homology-dependent and homology-independent algorithms. Annu Rev Phytopathol. 2015;53:425–44.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Al Rwahnih M, Dave A, Anderson MM, Rowhani A, Uyemoto JK, Sudarshana MR. Association of a DNA virus with grapevines affected by red blotch disease in California. Phytopathology. 2013;103:1069–76.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Giampetruzzi A, Roumi V, Roberto R, Malossini U, Yoshikawa N, La Notte P, Terlizzi F, Credi R, Saldarelli P. A new grapevine virus discovered by deep sequencing of virus- and viroid-derived small RNAs in Cv Pinot gris. Virus Res. 2012;163:262–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Maliogka VI, Olmos A, Pappi PG, Lotos L, Efthimiou K, Grammatikaki G, Candresse T, Katis NI, Avgelis AD. A novel grapevine badnavirus is associated with the Roditis leaf discoloration disease. Virus Res. 2015;203:47–55.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Kreuze JF, Perez A, Untiveros M, Quispe D, Fuentes S, Barker I, Simon R. Complete viral genome sequence and discovery of novel viruses by deep sequencing of small RNAs. A generic method for diagnosis, discovery and sequencing of viruses. Virology. 2009;388:1–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Warner KE. The economics of tobacco: myths and realities. Tob Control. 2000;9:78–89.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Ding M, Yang C, Zhang L, Jiang ZL, Fang Q, Qin XY, Zhang ZK. Occurrence of Chilli veinal mottle virus in Nicotiana tabacum in Yunnan. China Plant Disease. 2011;95:357.Google Scholar
  14. Tian YP, Liu JL, Zhang CL, Liu YY, Wang B, Li XD, Guo ZK, Valkonen JP. Genetic diversity of potato virus Y infecting tobacco crops in China. Phytopathology. 2011;101:377–87.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Dong JH, Yin YY, Xu XY, Duan YM, Zhang ZK. First report of tomato spotted wilt virus in tomato and tobacco in China. J Plant Pathol. 2010;92:S121.Google Scholar
  16. Wang F, Qi S, Gao Z, Akinyemi IA, Xu D, Zhou B. Complete genome sequence of tobacco virus 1, a closterovirus from Nicotiana tabacum. Arch Virol. 2016;161:1087–90.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Q-F LIU, M-D LI, H-Y WU, X-D WU, D-Y PENG. Geochemical characteristics of typical tobacco-planting soils in Zhangjiajie mountainous area. Chin J Eco-Agric. 2012;6:19.Google Scholar
  18. Zerbino DR, Birney E. Velvet: algorithms for de novo short read assembly using de Bruijn graphs. Genome Res. 2008;18:821–9.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Schulz MH, Zerbino DR, Vingron M, Birney E. Oases: robust de novo RNA-seq assembly across the dynamic range of expression levels. Bioinformatics. 2012;28:1086–92.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Langmead B, Trapnell C, Pop M, Salzberg SL. Ultrafast and memory-efficient alignment of short DNA sequences to the human genome. Genome Biol. 2009;10:R25.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Kayode AB, Odu BO, Ako-Nai KA, Alabi OJ. Occurrence of cucumber mosaic virus subgroups IA and IB isolates in tomatoes in Nigeria. Plant Dis. 2014;98:1750.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Chen YF, Chen JS, Zhang HR, Tang XS, Du ZY. Molecular evidence and sequence analysis of a natural reassortant between Cucumber mosaic virus subgroup IA and II strains. Virus Genes. 2007;35:405–13.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Pourrahim R, Farzadfar S. Population analysis of Iranian potato virus Y isolates using complete genome sequence. Plant Pathol J. 2016;32:33–46.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  24. Vance VB, Moore D, Turpen TH, Bracker A, Hollowell VC. The complete nucleotide sequence of pepper mottle virus genomic RNA: comparison of the encoded polyprotein with those of other sequenced potyviruses. Virology. 1992;191:19–30.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Adams MJ, Antoniw JF, Kreuze J. Virgaviridae: a new family of rod-shaped plant viruses. Arch Virol. 2009;154:1967–72.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Bonnet J, Fraile A, Sacristan S, Malpica JM, Garcia-Arenal F. Role of recombination in the evolution of natural populations of Cucumber mosaic virus, a tripartite RNA plant virus. Virology. 2005;332:359–68.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Davino S, Panno S, Rangel EA, Davino M, Bellardi MG, Rubio L. Population genetics of cucumber mosaic virus infecting medicinal, aromatic and ornamental plants from northern Italy. Arch Virol. 2012;157:739–45.Google Scholar
  28. Moury B, Morel C, Johansen E, Jacquemond M. Evidence for diversifying selection in Potato virus Y and in the coat protein of other potyviruses. J Gen Virol. 2002;83:2563–73.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Singh RP, Valkonen JP, Gray SM, Boonham N, Jones RA, Kerlan C, Schubert J. Discussion paper: the naming of potato virus Y strains infecting potato. Arch Virol. 2008;153:1–13.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Glais L, Tribodet M, Kerlan C. Genomic variability in Potato potyvirus Y (PVY): evidence that PVY(N)W and PVY(NTN) variants are single to multiple recombinants between PVY(O) and PVY(N) isolates. Arch Virol. 2002;147:363–78.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Cuevas JM, Delaunay A, Visser JC, Bellstedt DU, Jacquot E, Elena SF. Phylogeography and molecular evolution of potato virus Y. PLoS One. 2012;7:e37853.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  32. Domingo E, Escarmis C, Sevilla N, Moya A, Elena SF, Quer J, Novella IS, Holland JJ. Basic concepts in RNA virus evolution. Faseb Journal. 1996;10:859–64.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Hu XJ, Karasev AV, Brown CJ, Lorenzen JH. Sequence characteristics of potato virus Y recombinants. J Gen Virol. 2009;90:3033–41.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Worobey M, Holmes EC. Evolutionary aspects of recombination in RNA viruses. J Gen Virol. 1999;80:2535–43.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Acosta-Leal R, Duffy S, Xiong Z, Hammond RW, Elena SF. Advances in plant virus evolution: translating evolutionary insights into better disease management. Phytopathology. 2011;101:1136–48.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Moodley V, Ibaba JD, Naidoo R, Gubba A. Full-genome analyses of a Potato Virus Y (PVY) isolate infecting pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) in the Republic of South Africa. Virus Genes. 2014;49:466–76.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Wang F, Gao ZL, An MN, Zhou BG, Wu YH. Sequencing and phylogenetic analysis of potato virus Y Liaoning isolate in China. J Integr Agric. 2013;12:1195–200.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Nouri S, Arevalo R, Falk BW, Groves RL. Genetic structure and molecular variability of Cucumber mosaic virus isolates in the United States. PLoS One. 2014;9, e96582.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  39. Kehoe MA, Coutts BA, Buirchell BJ, Jones RAC. Plant virology and next generation sequencing: experiences with a Potyvirus. Plos One. 2014;9.Google Scholar
  40. Froissart R, Roze D, Uzest M, Galibert L, Blanc S, Michalakis Y. Recombination every day: abundant recombination in a virus during a single multi-cellular host infection. PLoS Biol. 2005;3:e89.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  41. Malpica JM, Fraile A, Moreno I, Obies CI, Drake JW, Garcia-Arenal F. The rate and character of spontaneous mutation in an RNA virus. Genetics. 2002;162:1505–11.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  42. Roossinck MJ. Evolutionary history of Cucumber mosaic virus deduced by phylogenetic analyses. J Virol. 2002;76:3382–7.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  43. Lin HX, Rubio L, Smythe AB, Falk BW. Molecular population genetics of Cucumber mosaic virus in California: evidence for founder effects and reassortment. J Virol. 2004;78:6666–75.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  44. Yang X, Wang Y, Guo W, Xie Y, Xie Q, Fan L, Zhou X. Characterization of small interfering RNAs derived from the geminivirus/betasatellite complex using deep sequencing. PLoS One. 2011;6, e16928.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  45. Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ. Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol. 1990;215:403–10.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Ho T, Tzanetakis IE. Development of a virus detection and discovery pipeline using next generation sequencing. Virology. 2014;471:54–60.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Katoh K, Standley DM. MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability. Mol Biol Evol. 2013;30:772–80.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  48. Tamura K, Stecher G, Peterson D, Filipski A, Kumar S. MEGA6: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 6.0. Mol Biol Evol. 2013;30:2725–9.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  49. Felsenstein J. Confidence-limits on phylogenies - an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution. 1985;39:783–91.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  50. Martin DP, Murrell B, Golden M, Khoosal A, Muhire B. RDP4: Detection and analysis of recombination patterns in virus genomes. Virus Evolution. 2015;1:vev003.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  51. Padidam M, Sawyer S, Fauquet CM. Possible emergence of new geminiviruses by frequent recombination. Virology. 1999;265:218–25.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Salminen MO, Carr JK, Burke DS, McCutchan FE. Identification of breakpoints in intergenotypic recombinants of HIV type 1 by bootscanning. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 1995;11:1423–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Smith JM. Analyzing the mosaic structure of genes. J Mol Evol. 1992;34:126–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Posada D, Crandall KA. Evaluation of methods for detecting recombination from DNA sequences: computer simulations. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001;98:13757–62.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  55. Gibbs MJ, Armstrong JS, Gibbs AJ. Sister-Scanning: a Monte Carlo procedure for assessing signals in recombinant sequences. Bioinformatics. 2000;16:573–82.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Boni MF, Posada D, Feldman MW. An exact nonparametric method for inferring mosaic structure in sequence triplets. Genetics. 2007;176:1035–47.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  57. Tomitaka Y, Ohshima K. A phylogeographical study of the Turnip mosaic virus population in East Asia reveals an ‘emergent” lineage in Japan. Mol Ecol. 2006;15:4437–57.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2016

Advertisement