Skip to main content

Sequence and phylogentic analysis of MERS-CoV in Saudi Arabia, 2012–2019

Abstract

Background

The Middle East Respiratory Syndrome-related Coronavirus (MERS-CoV) continues to exist in the Middle East sporadically. Thorough investigations of the evolution of human coronaviruses (HCoVs) are urgently required. In the current study, we studied amplified fragments of ORF1a/b, Spike (S) gene, ORF3/4a, and ORF4b of four human MERS-CoV strains for tracking the evolution of MERS-CoV over time.

Methods

RNA isolated from nasopharyngeal aspirate, sputum, and tracheal swabs/aspirates from hospitalized patients with suspected MERS-CoV infection were analyzed for amplification of nine variable genomic fragments. Sequence comparisons were done using different bioinformatics tools available.

Results

Several mutations were identified in ORF1a/b, ORF3/4a and ORF4b, with the highest mutation rates in the S gene. Five codons; 4 in ORF1a and 1 in the S gene, were found to be under selective pressure. Characteristic amino acid changes, potentially hosted and year specific were defined across the S protein and in the receptor-binding domain Phylogenetic analysis using S gene sequence revealed clustering of MERS-CoV strains into three main clades, A, B and C with subdivision of with clade B into B1 to B4.

Conclusions

In conclusion, MERS-CoV appears to continuously evolve. It is recommended that the molecular and pathobiological characteristics of future MERS-CoV strains should be analyzed on regular basis to prevent potential future outbreaks at early phases.

Background

Coronaviruses (CoVs) have long been known to infect humans and several animal species, causing systemic infections of respiratory airways, intestine, liver, and nervous system [1, 2]. Previously, human CoVs such as HCoV-229E, HCoV-NL63, HCoV-OC43 and HCoV-HKU1 were known to cause mild and self-limiting respiratory diseases mainly upper respiratory tract infections in the human population. Nevertheless, three outbreaks due to human CoVs have been already witnessed in the last two decades. The first outbreak caused by SARS-CoV-1 originated in China and gradually spread to several countries around the world leading to the death of 774 (9.56%) cases out of 8096 reported to the World Health Organization [3]. The causative agent of the second outbreak was identified as MERS-CoV which was originated in Saudi Arabia in September 2012, and spread to the neighboring countries and further to other geographically distant regions [4,5,6].

According to WHO, MERS-CoV outbreak is on-going causing 2519 laboratory-confirmed cases till now, of which 866 (34.3%) have died, majority of them in Saudi Arabia. Clinical manifestations of MERS-CoV are similar to those of SARS, nevertheless, MERS-CoV patients mostly develop rapid respiratory failure [5]. The third and the biggest pandemic started in Wuhan, China, in December, 2019. During 1 year since the reporting of the first case, SARS-CoV-2 has affected more than 215 countries with more than 55 million cases. Of these, more than 1.3 million have died with a case fatality rate of more than 2% [7]. Bats are the common reservoir for several beta coronaviruses from which the virus jump to humans through an intermediate hosts [8,9,10]. However, in case of MERS-CoV, human infections are thought to occur directly from bats or through an intermediate host, most likely dromedary camels [11,12,13].

MERS-CoV belongs to the subfamily Orthocoronavirinae, family Coronaviridae, and order Nidovirales. Viruses of this family are enveloped with polycistronic, non-segmented, positive sense, single-stranded, RNA (~ 30 kbp). According to ICTV, Orthocoronavirinae has four genera; Alphacoronavirus, Betacoronavirus, Gammacoronavirus, and Deltacoronavirus [14, 15]. Full genome sequence analysis allocated MERS-CoV among betacoronaviruses lineage C, a group that include bat-CoVs [13, 16]. MERS-CoV’s genome was predicted to contain 10 ORFs with the first 5′-three-fourths sequence encodes for RdRp (ORF1a and ORF1b) [16]. These two ORFs are translated via -1 ribosomal frameshifting to yield polyproteins pp1a and pp1b which are processed into 16 nonstructural proteins (nsps) [17, 18]. The last third ORFs are downstream ORF1b and encode for the structural proteins; spike (S), envelop (E), membrane (M) and nucleocapsid (N). Among these proteins, S protein mediates virus entry via attachment to dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP4) [19, 20]. Therefore, S protein is among the highly variable MERS-CoV proteins and hence, a target for phylogenetic studies and designing therapeutic agents.

MERS-CoV transmission, evolution, divergence and animal reservoir are critical issues that should be resolved for effective control of MERS-CoV and potentially for the current SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. CoVs are known for a high rate of recombination, a feature that enables them to infect several hosts and to fit well in different environmental niches [21,22,23]. Phylogenetic analysis based on the deduced amino acid sequences of the RdRp domain (ORF1ab, ORF1b) and conserved regions of structural proteins (S, E, N and M) revealed that MERS-CoV is closely related to HCoV-HKU4 and HCoV-HKU5 [14, 24, 25]. Moreover, MERS-CoV shares high sequence identity with bat CoVs from Africa, Europe and America [24, 26]. In the current study, four MERS-CoV isolates of human origin were used for sequence and phylogenetic analysis. Sequence contigs of 6916 nts including ORF1a/b, S, and ORF3/4a were amplified, sequenced and assembled. Sequence analysis was performed and mutations were recorded along the whole sequence contigs. Codons under selective pressure were investigated. Phylogenetic analysis was performed based on the S gene.

Materials and methods

Clinical samples

Nasopharyngeal aspirate and/or swab samples were obtained from hospitalized patients with suspected MERS-CoV infection at three different cities in Saudi Arabia: Riyadh, Madinah and Dammam. Sputum and tracheal swabs/aspirates were also considered in few cases. A wide spectrum of clinical symptoms was included as probable signals for MERS-CoV infection including fever, myalgia, cough, dyspnea, aches, abdominal pain, vomiting and diarrhea. Samples were collected and handled by the relevant authorities at the Saudi Ministry of Health (MOH-SA) during December 2014 and January 2015 following the strict biosafety guidelines set by WHO and CDC [7, 27]. Samples were transported in viral transport medium to the regional laboratories of MOH-SA and processed immediately or stored at − 80 °C till use. Informed consents were obtained from the patients or their guardians and the study protocols were prepared to conform to the 1975 Declaration of Helsinki.

RNA extraction and real-time RT-PCR

Upon receipt, samples were shacked vigorously and equal volumes of sample and external lysis buffer (6 M Guanidine Isothiocyanate, 30% Triton X-100, 100 mM Tris–HCl, 0.01% Bromophenol blue) were mixed in a safety cabinet. Clinical samples were extracted using one of two automatic nucleic acid isolation systems according to their availability in different MOH-SA regional laboratories including: MagNA Pure 96 (Roche Diagnostics, Indianapolis, IN) and QIAsymphony SP (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). MagNA Pure Compact Nucleic Acid Isolation (Roche) and QIAsymphony RNA (Qiagen) kits were utilized for viral RNA extraction in the corresponding platform according to the manufacturer's instructions. Single negative control of PCR grade water was extracted in parallel for every 12 samples. All samples were screened for MERS-CoV using LightMix® Modular MERS-CoV upE Kit (Roche) using the experimental protocol and reaction setup primarily established by Corman et al. [28]. Positive results were confirmed with LightMix® Modular MERS-CoV ORF1a Kit (Roche). Samples with doubtful results (i.e. positive reactivity in one assay and negative in the other) were re-extracted and tested in triplicates in both UpE and ORF1a assays.

Generation of sequence data

RNA isolated from MERS-CoV positive samples was used for amplification of nine genomic fragments that possess considerable sequence variability among MERS-CoV strains circulating worldwide in man and animals. The nine fragments include four for ORF1a/b, three for S gene, one for ORF3/4a and one for ORF4b (Table 1, Fig. 1). Amplification was performed in a single step RT-PCR using SuperScript® III One-Step RT-PCR System with Platinum® Taq DNA Polymerase (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA). The cycling protocol involved: one cycle at 55ºC for 30 min, one cycle at 94ºC for 2 min, 40 cycles of 94ºC for 15 s, 55ºC (58 ºC for fragments 1, 5, 8 and 9) for 30 s and 68ºC for 1 min, and one cycle at 68ºC for 10 min. The amplified fragments were purified using QIAquick PCR purification kit (Qiagen) and were sequenced on both strands using BigDye Terminator version 3.1 sequencing kit on ABI PRISM 3730xl genetic analyzer at GATC Biotech (Cologne, Germany). The sequence of the nine regions was edited using Bioedit software, version 7.2.5 (Ibis Biosciences, Carlsbad, CA) and was assembled in a concatenated sequence of 6916 bases (around 23% of the genome length).

Table 1 Primers used for amplification of sequencing fragments
Fig. 1
figure1

MER-CoV genome depiction and primer design. a full length MERS-CoV genome showing different ORFs. b location of primers that have been used to amplify the target ORFs

Sequence and phylogenetic analysis

The complete genome sequence of 92 MERS-CoV Saudi and international strains (67 of human-origin and 25 of camel-origin) were retrieved from the GenBank database. Strains were chosen to represent the different MERS-CoV genotypes [29, 30], the variable geographic regions worldwide, and the entire period of virus spread (2012 to 2019). Sequences were edited and trimmed using Editseq program of Lasergene software, version 3.18 (DNAStar, Madison, WI) to display concatenated sequences corresponding to those generated in the current study. Multiple sequence alignment for divergence analysis, identification of mutation sites, and prediction of amino acid substitutions was performed using Clustal W algorithm, MegAlign program, Lasergene v3.18. Heterogeneity in the glycosylation profiles of all MERS-CoV stains was assessed by determining the potential N- and O-linked glycosylation sites using Net-N-glyc 1.0 (http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/ services/NetNGlyc) and Net-O-glyc 3.1 (http://www.cbs. dtu.dk/services/NetOGlyc), respectively [31]. The phylogenetic tree was constructed based on both 2670 nts of the S gene. Phylogenetic analysis was accomplished using the maximum likelihood (ML) method of MEGA 6.0 software with bootstrapping of 1000 pseudo-replicates.

Analysis of selective pressure

To investigate the evolutionary dynamics, identify and allocate statistically significant positive and negative selective pressure sites, codons over the entire concatenated sequence were screened using DataMonkey server (http://www.datamonkey.org) [32, 33]. Four different models were employed for such purpose including: (1) single likelihood ancestor counting (SLAC), which uses a combination of ML and counting approaches to determine dN/dS substitution rates per-site basis for coding sequence alignment and its phylogeny, (2) fixed effects likelihood (FEL), (3) random effects likelihood (REL), (4), mixed effects model of evolution (MEME), which was applied to allocate positively selected sites among different clades within a phylogenetic tree. Sites with a statistical p-value of < 0.1 were considered under positive selection.

Nucleotide sequence accession numbers

The nucleotide sequence of the different genome fragments of MERS-CoV strains analyzed in this study have been deposited in GenBank under the following accession numbers: KT624236—KT624239 (ORF1a/b), KT624240—KT624243 (Spike gene), KT624244—KT624247 (ORF3), and KT624248—KT62451 (ORF4b).

Results

Sequence analysis, mutation record and glycosylation profile

Multiple alignment of the assembled concatenated sequence of the four Saudi MERS-CoV strains revealed no abnormal sequence variations like gaps, insertions, and/or deletions. The overall nucleotide and deduced amino acid sequence homology ranged from 99.1 to 100% and from 98.8 to 100%, respectively. A total of 27 mutations were recognized, among which 7 mutations changed their corresponding amino acid residues (Table 2). The majority of mutations (n = 14) was identified in S protein gene. To track the evolution of S and ORF1a/b proteins throughout the years 2012–2019, the deduced amino acid sequences of all analyzed sequences were compared to EMC-2012; the first MERS-CoV isolate. The spike protein seemed to be conserved among all the tested strains with about 99% sequence homology. Some amino acid changes appear characteristic to specific sub-clusters including: V27A, G159Y, H194Y, S390F, L450F A597V, R626P, L745F for MERS-CoVs of Ethiopian camels (2017), V27L for Riyadh and Qaseem human isolates (2018), L411F for isolates of Riyadh (2014), A756Q, E666K and M696T for camel isolates of UAE and Egypt (2014). More importantly, the receptor binding domain (RBD) of the S1 protein subunit (residues 358 to 588) displayed amino acid changes in several MERS-CoV strains, such as K369I in Camel-Jeddah-O47(b)-2017, S390F in strains of Ethiopian camels, S457G in KFU-HKU-19dam-2013, S460F in Qatar-3–2013, A434S in Camel-Egypt-NRCE-HKU-205, Y447X in Camel-UAE-D1209-2015, and D509G in both Bisha-2012 and Riaydh-1–2012 strains (Fig. 2a).

Table 2 Mutation record analysis of MERS-CoV strains identified in the current study
Fig. 2
figure2

Deduced amino acid alignments of representative strains from different years were selected, and the alignment was done by Clustal W method running within the MegAlign program (DNAstar). Alignments are shown in comparison with the consensus sequences of the first isolated MERS-CoV strain (EMC-2012). Dots represent the identical amino acid residues. a displays 80 deduced amino acids of the S protein RBD. Host and year specific amino acids are shown in boxes. b 90 amino acid residues of ORF1a/b (residues 1025 to 1105) showed a distinct pattern where several amino acids had been changed permanently in comparison with the isolate (EMC-2012); 1000 T/V, 1055 P/S, 1070 A/E, 1094 N/S

ORF1a/b showed a distinct pattern where several amino acids had been changed permanently in comparison with the isolate (EMC-2012); 1000 T/V, 1055 P/S, 1070 A/E, 1094 N/S, 2747 A/V and 2780 A/V (Fig. 2b). Two amino acid changes, 981 G/S, and 1099 P/R, were found to be characteristic to the isolates of 2018 and 2019. Similarly, isolates of 2016 have one characteristic amino acid change at 1052 P/S. Four mutations were recorded in ORF3/4a and 4 in ORF4b (Table 2). Of these, 3 mutations changed the corresponding amino acids in ORF3/4a; L8527F, A8552V, and S8596L and two in ORF4b; S8703T and M8723T. Both N and O glycosylation sites were determined for the S protein. A total of 13 potential N-glycosylation sites, 66, 104, 125, 166, 222, 236, 244, 410, 487, 592, 619, 719, and 870, were reported for all the tested strains including our strains. Only one strain, isolate 1390-Hu-Jed, isolated in March of 2019 in Jeddah displayed an additional N-glycosylation site at 155. In the contrast, potential sites for O-glycosylation ranged from 2 to 4. In most strains, residues 135, and 878 seemed to be conserved for O-glycosylation.

Codons under selective pressure

The adaptive evolution of MERS-CoV strains was evaluated by calculating dN/dS ratio (ѡ) for the entire amplified fragments. Most codons of the two major clades (A and B) displayed purifying selection with ѡ < 1 (0.329 for clade A and 0.438 for clade B). Only 5 codons, 4 in ORF1a (926, 1055, 2747 and 3785), and 1 in spike gene (7085) were found to have ѡ > 1 by the four different models, SLAC, FEL, REL and MEME with statistical significance values.

Phylogenetic analysis

The phylogenetic tree was constructed based solely on the nucleotide sequence of the spike gene. MERS-CoV strains were clustered into three main clades, A, B and C (Fig. 3). Clade A has four strains including the first strain isolate from Bisha, Saudi Arabia in 2012, an early strain from Jordan, and two camel strains from UAE and Egypt. The majority of MERS-CoV strains are grouped into clade B which is further divided into 4 distinctive lineages B1 to B4. Most of the Saudi strains, including those of the current study, are members of lineage B3. Strains from Korea and China are also grouped into lineage B3, whereas UAE strains of both human and camel origin are grouped in lineage B1. Clade C contains only three strains of camel origin isolated in Ethiopia in 2017.

Fig. 3
figure3

Phylogenetic tree based on the first 2670 nt of the S gene using MEGA 6.06 program. Multiple sequence alignment was performed using Clustal W, and the phylogram was generated by the Maximum Likelihood method based on the Tamura-Nei model. The analysis involved 73 nucleotide sequences. All positions containing gaps and missing data were eliminated. Only bootstrap values exceeding 50% are displayed. Clades and lineages are indicated at the periphery of the phylogram

Discussion

MERS-CoV continues to circulate in the Middle East region causing sporadic cases, particularly in Saudi Arabia. The extinction of SARS-CoV-1, the causative agent of 2002–2003′s pandemic, the low spread rate of MERS-CoV, and the emergence of the current SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has raised several questions regarding coronavirus (CoV) genetics and evolution. In the current study, we aimed at analyzing the sequence of four MERS-CoV strains identified in the winter season of 2014–2015. These sequences were compared to a wide range of strains identified in both human and camel over 7 years (2012–2019). The use of concatenated sequences particularly those of the most important genes was found to be reliable for sequence and phylogenetic analysis of MERS-CoV [34, 35].

One of the interesting features of CoVs is its ability to use different cellular receptors. For instance, HCoV-229E uses Aminopeptidase N [36], SARS-CoV-1 and SARS-CoV-2 use angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) [37], whereas S protein of MERS-CoV binds to dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP4) [20]. The location of S protein on the surface of virus envelope and its role in initiating virus infection makes it a preferred target for host defense and consequently a major hot spot for mutation. In comparison to EMC-2012, the first identified MERS-CoV strain, several characteristic amino acid changes were reported along the S gene including the RBD. These changes appear to be host and year specific. The host specificity of these amino acid changes in RBD may reflect adaptation to human or camel cellular receptors. Whereas year specific changes reflect continuous accumulation of mutations over time to coup with the immune response, only one codon of the S gene was found to be under selective pressure. In contrast, RSV and influenza viruses evolve mainly by introducing several point mutations in the attachment and hemagglutinin proteins, respectively. This finding adds more evidence that CoVs evolve by introducing major changes in the S gene through recombination rather than accumulation of point mutations. Glycosylation of viral glycoproteins usually modulate virus infectivity and antigenicity [38, 39]. Both N- and O-linked oligosaccharides may mask epitopes in certain cases and hence enables the virus to escape the immune system [40, 41]. In a previous study, we have reported that the variation in the glycosylation pattern of Saudi HRSV-A strains had a deep impact on virus infectivity and immunogenicity [42]. Here, we report a total of 13 potential N-glycosylation and from 2 to 4 O-linked glycosylation sites in the spike protein. These glycosylation sites may enhance virus infectivity and help to evade the pre-existing immunity.The drawback of the present study is the limited number of specimens used for analysis. Although a few number of (partial) sequence has been used, the data are still relevant and indicative. Even though the whole genome sequence is variable, however, the fragments included in the study are the most variable and therefore more suitable for studying virus evolution overtime. From our bioinformatic analysis of the entire MERS-CoV genome, we do not expect a significant difference in the results.

The relationship between different strains of MERS-CoV at the level of geographical distribution and host range (i.e. camel or human) was further elucidated in phylogenetic analysis. Although we used partial sequence of S gene (2670 nt), the tree topology was almost similar to that constructed using complete S gene and full genome sequences [43,44,45,46]. Because of the high sequence similarity between MERS-CoV strains of camel and human origins, clades displayed a mix of both. In a previous study, Lau et al., has classified the MERS-CoV strains into two major clades, A and B [43]. In this study, inclusion of MERS-CoV strains isolated from Ethiopian camels has resulted in appearance of a third clade (C). Clade C was recognized before to contain isolates from Ethiopia, Burkina Faso, Egypt, Morocco, and Nigeria, and therefore, it may be considered as an African clade [44].

MERS-CoV is largely circulating among dromedary camels in the Middle East region and in North and East Africa as evidenced by the high seropositive rates in many of the affected countries [47, 48]. However, human cases were not reported in most of the African countries and remained confined only to the Middle East region. This may be explained by the antigenic variation between the S protein of MERS-CoV isolated from dromedaries in Ethiopia and those isolated from the Middle East. Another explanation is that MERS-CoV strains of Ethiopian camels replicate at lower rates in tissue culture and are easily neutralized by lower concentration of sera [44].

Lineage B3 comprises most strains isolated in Saudi Arabia as well as in South Korea and China [49]. The virus was reportedly transmitted to South Korea via a Korean who performed multiple visits to the Middle East countries including Saudi Arabia. Interestingly, the same strain was transmitted to China via two infected persons who travelled from South Korea [50].

Accessory proteins play an important role in the pathogenesis of MERS-CoV. For example, the product of ORF4a inhibits interferon production through binding to dsRNA while the product of ORF4b mediate virus evasion of IFN actions [51, 52]. Therefore, amino acid changes in both ORFs may modulate the host immune response against MERS-CoV. Here, we reported four mutations in each ORF with amino acid changes in the corresponding codons. However, the impact of these amino acid changes on virus pathogenicity requires further studies.

Conclusion

In conclusion, sequence and phylogenetic analysis of MERS-CoV overtime from 2012 to 2019 revealed the continuous evolution of the virus. MERS-CoV evolution was apparent in both ORF1a/b and the S gene. Interestingly, amino acid changes seemed to be host and year specific reflecting virus adaptation to host cellular receptors and evolution overtime to coup with the host immunity. Taking into consideration the inconsistent epidemiological patterns of HCoVs, we recommend frequent monitoring the sequences of MERS-CoV isolates particularly the S protein and understand these changes with regard to disease severity. Deep understanding of virus evolution will be useful to contain and develop effective tools for controlling any possible MERSCoV outbreak at early stages.

Availability of data and materials

Samples were collected and handled by the relevant authorities at the Saudi Ministry of Health (MOH-SA) following the strict biosafety guidelines set by WHO and CDC [7, 27]. Samples were transported in viral transport medium to the regional laboratories of MOH-SA and processed immediately or stored at − 80 °C till use.

Abbreviations

MERS-CoV:

Middle East Respiratory Syndrome-related Coronavirus

CoVs:

Coronaviruses

References

  1. 1.

    Perlman S. Pathogenesis of coronavirus-induced infections. Review of pathological and immunological aspects. Adv Exp Med Biol. 1998;440:503–13.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Weiss SR, Navas-Martin S. Coronavirus pathogenesis and the emerging pathogen severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2005;69(4):635–64. https://doi.org/10.1128/MMBR.69.4.635-664.2005.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Lam WK, Zhong NS, Tan WC. Overview on SARS in Asia and the world. Respirology. 2003;8 Suppl(Suppl 1):S2–5. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1440-1843.2003.00516.x.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Zaki AM, van Boheemen S, Bestebroer TM, Osterhaus ADME, Fouchier RAM. Isolation of a novel coronavirus from a man with pneumonia in Saudi Arabia. N Engl J Med. 2012;367(19):1814–20. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1211721.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Assiri A, Al-Tawfiq JA, Al-Rabeeah AA, et al. Epidemiological, demographic, and clinical characteristics of 47 cases of Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus disease from Saudi Arabia: a descriptive study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2013;13(9):752–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(13)70204-4.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Cauchemez S, Van Kerkhove MD, Riley S, Donnelly CA, Fraser C, Ferguson NM. Transmission scenarios for Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus (MERS-CoV) and how to tell them apart. Euro Surveill. 2013;18(24):20503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    WHO | Laboratory testing for Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus. WHO. Accessed November 20, 2020. http://www.who.int/csr/disease/coronavirus_infections/mers-laboratorytesting/en/

  8. 8.

    Woo PCY, Wang M, Lau SKP, et al. Comparative analysis of twelve genomes of three novel group 2c and group 2d coronaviruses reveals unique group and subgroup features. J Virol. 2007;81(4):1574–85. https://doi.org/10.1128/JVI.02182-06.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Li W, Zhang C, Sui J, et al. Receptor and viral determinants of SARS-coronavirus adaptation to human ACE2. EMBO J. 2005;24(8):1634–43. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.emboj.7600640.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Lau SKP, Fan RYY, Luk HKH, et al. Replication of MERS and SARS coronaviruses in bat cells offers insights to their ancestral origins. Emerging Microbes Infect. 2018;7(1):1–11. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41426-018-0208-9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Buchholz U, Müller MA, Nitsche A, et al. Contact investigation of a case of human novel coronavirus infection treated in a German hospital, October-November 2012. Euro Surveill. 2013;18(8):20406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Meyer B, Müller MA, Corman VM, et al. Antibodies against MERS Coronavirus in Dromedary Camels, United Arab Emirates, 2003 and 2013. Emerg Infect Dis. 2014;20(4):552–9. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid2004.131746.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Lau SKP, Li KSM, Tsang AKL, et al. Genetic characterization of betacoronavirus lineage C viruses in bats reveals marked sequence divergence in the spike protein of pipistrellus bat coronavirus HKU5 in japanese pipistrelle: implications for the origin of the novel middle east respiratory syndrome coronavirus. J Virol. 2013;87(15):8638–50. https://doi.org/10.1128/JVI.01055-13.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    de Groot RJ, Baker SC, Baric RS, et al. Middle east respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERSCoV): announcement of the coronavirus study group. J Virol. 2013;87(14):7790–2. https://doi.org/10.1128/JVI.01244-13.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Woo PCY, Lau SKP, Lam CSF, et al. Discovery of seven novel mammalian and avian coronaviruses in the genus deltacoronavirus supports bat coronaviruses as the gene source ofalphacoronavirus and betacoronavirus and avian coronaviruses as the gene source of gammacoronavirus and deltacoronavirus. J Virol. 2012;86(7):3995–4008. https://doi.org/10.1128/JVI.06540-11.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    van Boheemen S, de Graaf M, Lauber C, et al. Genomic characterization of a newly discovered coronavirus associated with acute respiratory distress syndrome in humans. MBio. 2012. https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.00473-12.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Snijder EJ, Bredenbeek PJ, Dobbe JC, et al. Unique and conserved features of genome and proteome of SARS-coronavirus, an early split-off from the coronavirus group 2 lineage. J Mol Biol. 2003;331(5):991–1004. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-2836(03)00865-9.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Gorbalenya AE, Enjuanes L, Ziebuhr J, Snijder EJ. Nidovirales: Evolving the largest RNA virus genome. Virus Res. 2006;117(1):17–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.virusres.2006.01.017.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Chan JF-W, Chan K-H, Choi GK-Y, et al. Differential cell line susceptibility to the emerging novel human betacoronavirus 2c EMC/2012: implications for disease pathogenesis and clinical manifestation. J Infect Dis. 2013;207(11):1743–52. https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/jit123.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Raj VS, Mou H, Smits SL, et al. Dipeptidyl peptidase 4 is a functional receptor for the emerging human coronavirus-EMC. Nature. 2013;495(7440):251–4. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12005.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Zeng Q, Langereis MA, van Vliet ALW, Huizinga EG, de Groot RJ. Structure of coronavirus hemagglutinin-esterase offers insight into corona and influenza virus evolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008;105(26):9065–9. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0800502105.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Woo PCY, Lau SKP, Huang Y, Yuen K-Y. Coronavirus diversity, phylogeny and interspecies jumping. Exp Biol Med (Maywood). 2009;234(10):1117–27. https://doi.org/10.3181/0903-MR-94.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Lau SKP, Lee P, Tsang AKL, et al. Molecular epidemiology of human coronavirus OC43 reveals evolution of different genotypes over time and recent emergence of a novel genotype due to natural recombination. J Virol. 2011;85(21):11325–37. https://doi.org/10.1128/JVI.05512-11.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Annan A, Baldwin HJ, Corman VM, et al. Human betacoronavirus 2c EMC/2012-related viruses in bats, Ghana and Europe. Emerg Infect Dis. 2013;19(3):456–9. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid1903.121503.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Drexler JF, Corman VM, Drosten C. Ecology, evolution and classification of bat coronaviruses in the aftermath of SARS. Antiviral Res. 2014;101:45–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.antiviral.2013.10.013.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Anthony SJ, Ojeda-Flores R, Rico-Chávez O, et al. Coronaviruses in bats from Mexico. J Gen Virol. 2013;94(Pt 5):1028–38. https://doi.org/10.1099/vir.0.049759-0.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    MERS-CoV | Interim Guidelines for Clinical Specimens from PUI | CDC. Published March 23, 2020. Accessed November 20, 2020. https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/mers/guidelines-clinicalspecimens.html.

  28. 28.

    Corman VM, Eckerle I, Bleicker T, et al. Detection of a novel human coronavirus by real-time reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction. Euro Surveill. 2012. https://doi.org/10.2807/ese.17.39.20285-en.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Cotten M, Watson SJ, Kellam P, et al. Transmission and evolution of the Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus in Saudi Arabia: a descriptive genomic study. Lancet. 2013;382(9909):1993–2002. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61887-5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Smits SL, Raj VS, Pas SD, et al. Reliable typing of MERS-CoV variants with a small genome fragment. J Clin Virol. 2015;64:83–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcv.2014.12.006.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Steentoft C, Vakhrushev SY, Joshi HJ, et al. Precision mapping of the human O-GalNAc glycoproteome through SimpleCell technology. EMBO J. 2013;32(10):1478–88. https://doi.org/10.1038/emboj.2013.79.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Pond SLK, Frost SDW. Datamonkey: rapid detection of selective pressure on individual sites of codon alignments. Bioinformatics. 2005;21(10):2531–3. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bti320.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Weaver S, Shank SD, Spielman SJ, Li M, Muse SV, Kosakovsky Pond SL. Datamonkey 2.0: a modern web application for characterizing selective and other evolutionary processes. Mol Biol Evol. 2018;35(3):773–7. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msx335.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Nowotny N, Kolodziejek J. Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) in dromedary camels, Oman, 2013. Euro Surveill. 2014;19(16):20781.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Haagmans BL, Al Dhahiry SH, Reusken CB, Raj VS, Galiano M, Myers R, et al. Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus in dromedary camels: an outbreak investigation. Lancet Infect Dis. 2014;14(2):140–5.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Hofmann H, Simmons G, Rennekamp AJ, et al. Highly conserved regions within the spike proteins of human coronaviruses 229E and NL63 determine recognition of their respective cellular receptors. J Virol. 2006;80(17):8639–52. https://doi.org/10.1128/JVI.00560-06.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Walls AC, Park Y-J, Tortorici MA, Wall A, McGuire AT, Veesler D. Structure, function, and antigenicity of the SARS-CoV-2 spike glycoprotein. Cell. 2020;181(2):281-292.e6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2020.02.058.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Lambert DM. Role of oligosaccharides in the structure and function of respiratory syncytial virus glycoproteins. Virology. 1988;164(2):458–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/0042-6822(88)90560-0.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Palomo C, García-Barreno B, Peñas C, Melero JA. The G protein of human respiratory syncytial virus: significance of carbohydrate side-chains and the C-terminal end to its antigenicity. J Gen Virol. 1991;72(Pt 3):669–75. https://doi.org/10.1099/0022-1317-72-3-669.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Cane PA, Matthews DA, Pringle CR. Identification of variable domains of the attachment (G) protein of subgroup A respiratory syncytial viruses. J Gen Virol. 1991;72(9):2091–6. https://doi.org/10.1099/0022-1317-72-9-2091.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Roca A, Loscertales M-P, Quintó L, et al. Genetic variability among group A and B respiratory syncytial viruses in Mozambique: identification of a new cluster of group B isolates. J Gen Virol. 2001;82(Pt 1):103–11. https://doi.org/10.1099/0022-1317-82-1-103.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Farrag MA, Amer HM, Aziz IM, Alsaleh AN, Almajhdi FN. The emergence of subgenotype ON-1 of Human orthopneumovirus type A in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia: a new episode of the virus epidemiological dynamic. J Med Virol. 2020;92(8):1133–40. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmv.25643.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Lau SKP, Wong ACP, Lau TCK, Woo PCY. Molecular evolution of MERS coronavirus: dromedaries as a recent intermediate host or long-time animal reservoir? Int J Mol Sci. 2017. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms18102138.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Shirato K, Melaku SK, Kawachi K, et al. Middle east respiratory syndrome coronavirus in dromedaries in ethiopia is antigenically different from the middle east isolate EMC. Front Microbiol. 2019. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2019.01326.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Sohrab SS, Azhar EI. Genetic diversity of MERS-CoV spike protein gene in Saudi Arabia. J Infect Public Health. 2020;13(5):709–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiph.2019.11.007.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    AlBalwi MA, Khan A, AlDrees M, et al. Evolving sequence mutations in the Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus (MERS-CoV). J Infect Public Health. 2020;13(10):1544–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiph.2020.06.030.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Müller MA, Corman VM, Jores J, et al. MERS Coronavirus Neutralizing Antibodies in Camels, Eastern Africa, 1983–1997. Emerg Infect Dis. 2014;20(12):2093–5. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid2012.141026.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Fukushi S, Fukuma A, Kurosu T, et al. Characterization of novel monoclonal antibodies against the MERS-coronavirus spike protein and their application in species-independent antibody detection by competitive ELISA. J Virol Methods. 2018;251:22–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jviromet.2017.10.008.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Cowling BJ, Park M, Fang VJ, Wu P, Leung GM, Wu JT. Preliminary epidemiologic assessment of MERS-CoV outbreak in South Korea, May–June 2015. Euro Surveill. 2015;20(25). Accessed November 20, 2020. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4535930/.

  50. 50.

    Wang Y, Liu D, Shi W, et al. Origin and possible genetic recombination of the middle east respiratory syndrome coronavirus from the first imported case in China: phylogenetics and coalescence analysis. MBio. 2015;6(5):e01280-e1215. https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.01280-15.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Totura AL, Baric RS. SARS coronavirus pathogenesis: host innate immune responses and viral antagonism of interferon. Curr Opin Virol. 2012;2(3):264–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coviro.2012.04.004.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Yang Y, Ye F, Zhu N, et al. Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus ORF4b protein inhibits type I interferon production through both cytoplasmic and nuclear targets. Sci Rep. 2015;5:17554. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep17554.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Deanship of Scientific Research, KSU for technical support.

Funding

This study was supported by the researchers supporting project number (RSP-2020/198), King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

MF, HA, FA designed the study, MF,AH, RB perfomed the experiments and wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fahad N. Almajhdi.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Informed consents were obtained from the patients or their guardians and the study protocols were prepared to conform to the 1975 Declaration of Helsinki.

Consent for publication

Informed consents were obtained from the patients or their guardians for performing and publishing the results to conform to the 1975 Declaration of Helsinki.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Farrag, M.A., Amer, H.M., Bhat, R. et al. Sequence and phylogentic analysis of MERS-CoV in Saudi Arabia, 2012–2019. Virol J 18, 90 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12985-021-01563-7

Download citation

Keywords

  • Human coronaviruses
  • Mutation
  • Viruses
  • Sequence analysis
  • Evolution