Open Access

Association between sensitivity of viral thymidine kinase-associated acyclovir-resistant herpes simplex virus type 1 and virulence

  • Natsumi Omura1, 2,
  • Hikaru Fujii1,
  • Tomoki Yoshikawa1,
  • Souichi Yamada1,
  • Shizuko Harada1,
  • Takuya Inagaki1, 2,
  • Miho Shibamura1,
  • Haruko Takeyama2 and
  • Masayuki Saijo1, 2Email author
Virology Journal201714:59

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12985-017-0728-2

Received: 9 January 2017

Accepted: 9 March 2017

Published: 21 March 2017

Abstract

Background

Acyclovir (ACV)-resistant (ACVr) herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) infections are concern in immunocompromised patients. Most clinical ACVr HSV-1 isolates have mutations in the viral thymidine kinase (vTK) genes. The vTK-associated ACVr HSV-1 shows reduced virulence, but the association between the level of resistance and the virulence of the vTK-associated ACVr HSV-1 is still unclear.

Methods

The virulence in mice of 5 vTK-associated ACVr HSV-1 clones with a variety of ACV sensitivities, when inoculated through intracerebral and corneal routes, was evaluated in comparison with ACV-sensitive (ACVs) parent HSV-1 TAS.

Results

Although all the 5 ACVr HSV-1 clones and ACVs HSV-1 TAS showed a similar single-step growth capacity in vitro, the virulence of ACVr HSV-1 clones significantly decreased. A 50% lethal dose (LD50) of each clone was closely correlated with 50% inhibitory concentrations (IC50), demonstrating that the higher the ACV-sensitvity, the the higher the virulence among the ACVr clones. One of the ACVr HSV-1 clones with a relatively low IC50 value maintained similar virulence to that of the parent TAS. The infection in mice with ACVr HSV-1 due to a single amino acid substitution in vTK induced local diseases, keratitis and dermatitis, while vTK-deficient clone did not.

Conclusions

A statistically significant correlation between the virulence and susceptibility to ACV among ACVr HSV-1 clones was demonstrated.

Keywords

Herpes simplex virus type 1AcyclovirResistanceThymidine kinaseVirulence

Background

Acyclovir (ACV, 2-amino-1,9-dihydro-9-((2-hydroxyethoxy)methyl)-6H-purin-6- one) is an effective first-line antiviral drug to treat herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) infections. ACV is a guanosine analogue that is monophosphorylated mostly by viral thymidine kinase (vTK), followed by phosphorylation by cellular kinases to become the active form, ACV-triphosphate (ACV-TP). ACV-TP can be incorporated into a viral DNA chain by the action of viral DNA polymerase, resulting in inhibiting viral genome replication by the termination of viral DNA elongation at the site of incorporation, because it does not have 3’-OH in the side chain [1].

ACV-resistant (ACVr) HSV-1 emerges with high frequency in immunocompromised patients [24]. Most of clinical ACVr HSV-1 isolates have mutations in the thymidine kinase (TK) genes, and the remaining having mutations in the viral DNA polymerase genes [59]. It was reported that vTK was dispensable in cell culture replication; however, it played an important role in inducing virulence in animal models [1013]. Viral thymidine kinase-deficient HSV-1 impaired viral replication, virulence, establishment of latency, and reactivation in mice [9, 11, 1317]. Some mutant viruses, which had low TK activity or alter the ability to phosphorylate ACV, showed reduced pathogenicity, but some did not [11, 18, 19]. However, it remains unknown whether there is any relationship between the level of HSV-1 TK activity, susceptibility to ACV, and the level of virulence.

In the present study, the relationship between the phenotypes of ACVr HSV-1 and virulence in mice through intracerebral or corneal inoculations was evaluated.

Methods

Cells

African green monkey kidney (Vero) cells were grown at 37 °C with 5% CO2 in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium (DMEM) supplemented with 5% fetal bovine serum, 100 U/ml of penicillin and 100 μg/ml of streptomycin (DMEM-5FBS).

Virus

HSV-1 TAS was used as the wild ACVs clone [20]. ACVr HSV-1 clones generated from HSV-1 TAS in the presence of ACV in the previous study [21] were also used. The vTK gene nucleotide sequence, TK activity, and susceptibility of TAS and these ACVr clones used to ACV was reported previously. One ACVr HSV-1 clone due to frameshift mutation (CL1) was selected as the vTK-deficient and ACVr HSV-1 clone. Furthermore, the ACVr HSV-1 clones (CL18, CL19, CL22, and CL24) with a variety of ACV sensitivities to ACV due to a single amino acid substitution were selected from the set of ACVr HSV-1 clones. When the vTK activity of HSV-1 TAS was defined as 100%, vTK of CL1, CL18, CL19, CL22, and CL24 were <1.0%, 94%, 1.4%, 10%, and 24%, respectively [21]. The susceptibility of each HSV-1 clone to ACV was re-assessed by plaque reduction assay in Vero cells in the present study, as described previously [21]. The viruses were cultured in DMEM supplemented with 2% FBS, 100 U/ml of penicillin and 100 μg/ml of streptomycin (DMEM-2FBS). The nucleotide sequence of vTK gene of all the clones used was also re-determined for confirmation as described previously [21]. Although the data are now shown, nucleotide sequence of DNA polymerase gene of all the clones used was confirmed to be identical to that of HSV-1 TAS.

In vitro viral replication of ACVr HSV-1

A Vero cell monolayer in the T-12.5 cm2 tissue culture flasks was inoculated with each HSV-1 clone at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 5 plaque forming unit (pfu)/cell. After 1 hr absorption, the cells were washed with phosphate buffered saline solution (PBS) and then cultured in DMEM-2FBS. At 0, 6, 12, 24, and 48 hr incubation from the end of absorption, the medium and cells were collected and subjected to freeze-thaw. The viral titers were determined on Vero cell monolayers at each time point per three wells in the 24-well tissue culture plates by plaque forming assay. These experiments were performed independently twice.

Mice

Female BALB/c mice were purchased from SLC Japan (Kurume, Japan). All animal experiments were approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee of the National Institute of Infectious Diseases (NIID) and were carried out in accordance with the approved guidelines.

Intracerebral inoculation

Three-week-old mice (3 mice per group) were infected intracerebrally with 50 μl of DMEM-2FBS containing a designated amount of each HSV-1 clone. The mice were observed daily and 50% lethal dose (LD50) was determined at 14 days post infection (p.i.) by the Reed and Muench method [22]. This experiment was performed independently twice. When each experiment was carried out, the titer of the virus inoculated was confirmed to be the target by back titration with the plaque reduction assay in Vero cells.

Corneal inoculation

Five-week-old mice (7 mice per group) were intraperitoneally anesthetized by mixture of medetomidine chloride, midazolam, and butorphanol tartrate, and then infected with 5 μl of DMEM-2FBS that contained 1.0 × 106 PFU of each HSV-1 clone through corneal inoculation per each eye [23]. In control group, surparnatant of mock-infected Vero cells were used. The clinical condition was observed daily and the severity level of dermatitis and keratitis was evaluated using a scoring system for 3 weeks under the criteria shown in Table 1 [2325]. LD50 was determined at 21 days p.i. according to the Reed and Muench method [22]. Tears were collected from both eyes for 7 days p.i. using cotton tips, transferred to 1 ml of DMEM-2FBS, and frozen at -80 °C. The samples were thawed, and then infectious virus concentration was determined by plaque forming assay on Vero cells. This experiment was also performed independently twice. When each experiment was carried out, the titer of the virus inoculated was confirmed to be the target by back titration with the plaque forming assay in Vero cells.
Table 1

Score standard for the dermatitis and keratitis condition

Score

Dermatitis condition

Keratitis condition

0

Normal

Normal

1

Mild swelling (eyelid)

Neovascularization (the periphery of eyes)

2

Mild swelling (head)

partial opacity

4

Severe fur loss (head)

Bleb formation

5

-

Ulcer, Necrosis

Statistical analysis

The in vitro replication capacities was assessed among the HSV-1 clonses by Statistical analyses, which were computed by the GraphPad Prism software version 7.01 (GraphPad software, La Jolla, CA). Dunn’s multiple-comparison test was used to compare the in vitro replication capacities and the amount of virus shedding of each clone with that of the parental HSV-1 TAS in the cells infected with or tears collected from mice infected with each clone, respectively. In the analysis, the virus titer was log10 transformed. A significant difference was considered to be present for any p value of <0.05. The relationship between the sensitivities to ACV and LD50 of HSV-1 clones were assessed by the Pearson correlation coefficients.

Results

Re-characterization of HSV-1 clones used in the present study: sensitivity to ACV and nucleotide sequence of the viral TK gene

The sensitivity of all the HSV-1 clones (ACVs HSV-1 TAS and ACVr HSV-1 clones) used was re-assessed and confirmed that the order in sensitivity to ACV among the HSV-1 clones used was the same as that in the previous study [21]. Furthermore, the nucleotide sequence of the viral TK gene of all the clones used were confirmed to be identical to those determined in the previous study [21].

In vitro viral replication of ACVr HSV-1

All ACVr HSV-1 clones showed comparable viral replication to that of HSV-1 TAS at each time point in Vero cells (Fig. 1), being consistent with previous studies indicating that vTK activity is not essential for viral replication in tissue culture [13, 17, 26]. There was no statistically significant difference in the replication capacities of each ACVr HSV-1 clone in Vero cells from that of ACVs HSV-1 TAS.
Fig. 1

Single-step growth kinetics of all ACVr HSV-1 clones derived from the parent HSV-1 TAS in Vero cells. Vero cells were infected with each of HSV-1 clones at MOI of 5 per cell. The single-step growth kinetics were calculated from two independent experiments

Virulence of each ACVr HSV-1 clone in mice when inoculated intracerebrally

The LD50 values of ACVr HSV-1 clones were 7.7 × 100 to 1.0 × 104-fold higher than that of HSV-1 TAS when inoculated intracerebrally (Table 2). The intracerebral-LD50 was significantly correlated with IC50 values of ACV (Fig. 2). The Pearson correlation coefficients (r) and significance values were 0.87 and 0,024, respectively, indiating that the relationship was statistically significant.
Table 2

Mutations in vTK gene, susceptibility to ACV, and virulence of HSV-1 clones

HSV-1 clone

Mutations in vTK

Accession number

IC50 of ACV (that in the previous study [18]), (μg/ml)

LD50 (PFU/head)

 

Nucleotidea

Amino acida

  

Intracerebral inoculation

Corneal inoculation

TAS

No

No

AB047358

1.2 × 100 (6.0 × 10−1)

1.3 × 10−1

1.1 × 103

CL1

G added within 7G (430–436)

AB047359

1.1 × 102 (>1.0 × 102)

1.3 × 103

>1.0 × 106 c

CL18

C194A

Thr65Asnb

AB047372

5.6 × 100 (4.8 × 100)

7.5 × 100

4.9 × 104

CL19

C250T

Pro84Ser

AB047373

2.1 × 101 (1.6 × 101)

1.0 × 100

1.9 × 104

CL22

C734T

Thr245Met

AB047376

7.8 × 101 (8.0 × 101)

1.0 × 102

> 1.0 × 106

CL24

G1007A

Cys336Tyr

AB047378

5.6 × 101 (7.2 × 101)

3.2 × 101

> 1.0 × 106

a‘C194A’ represents the nucleotide substitution of cytosine (C) for adenine (A) at position 194

b‘Thr65Asn’ represents the amino acid substitution of threonine (Thr) for asparagine (Asn) at position 55

cAll mice infected with CL1, 22, 24 survived even at an input dose of 106 PFU

Fig. 2

Correlation of the susceptibility to ACV with LD50 determined by intracerebral inoculation (left panel) and with that determined by corneal inoculation (right panel) among the ACVr HSV-1 clones and the parent HSV-1 TAS

Virulence of each ACVr HSV-1 clone in mice when inoculated through cornea

The corneal-LD50 value of HSV-1 TAS was the lowest among the HSV-1 clones tested, followed by the CL19 and CL18. The corneal-LD50 of HSV-1 CL1, CL22, and CL24 were > 1.0 × 106. The corneal LD50 of HSV-1 of the CL 19 and CL18 was approximately 1.7 × 101 and 4.5 × 101 times higher than that of HSV-1 TAS, respectively (Table 2, Fig. 2right panel). All the mice inoculated with HSV-1 TAS at the dose of 1.0 × 106 PFU caused lethal infections within 7 days post infection (Fig. 3). All the mice inoculated with CL19 at the same dose also died within 7 days post infection (Fig. 3). Four of all 7 mice and 3 of all 7 mice inoculated with CL18 in Experiment 1 and Experiment 2, respectively (Fig. 3), died between 7 and 11 days post infection.
Fig. 3

Peripheral pathogenicity of ACVr HSV-1 clones and the parent HSV-1 TAS in mice. Mice were infected with each ACVr HSV-1 clone at the dose of 1.0 × 106 PFU / mouse through corneal route (one eye). This study was conducted twice independently [Experiment 1 (a) and Experiment 2 (b)]. Severity levels of dermatitis (upper panels) and keratitis (lower panels) were measured by using the scoring system introduced. All the mice inoculated with TAS or CL19 died within 7 days post infection

The mice inoculated ocularly with TAS or CL19 died before 7 days post infection, therefore the regional ocular lesions after 7 days post infection could not be observed. The post 7-days lesions worsend in mice inoculated with ACVr HSV-1 CL18, CL19, or CL 22, while those of the mice inoculated ocularly with CL1 was alsomt the same level as that of the control (Fig. 3).

Viral shedding in cornea of ocularly infected mice

The viral loads in tears of mice infected with each clone were almost the same level among all the mouse group within 2 days post infection. However, those of the mice infected with HSV-1 TAS, CL18 or CL19 at the dose of 1.0 × 106 PFU/eye maintained a higher level for 7 days, while those of the mice infected with HSV-1 CL1, CL22 or CL24 showed a obvious decrease in viral loads, particularly after 3 days post infection (Fig. 4). Statistical analyses with Dunn’s multiple-comparison test confirmed the results described above, because the statistically significant decrease in virus titers in tears of the mice infected with each clone against those infected with HSV-1 TAS was demonstrated in CL1-, CL22-, and CL24-infecting mice on days 2–5, days 3–5, and days 1–5, respectively. There was no statistically significant decrease in the titers was demonstrated between HSV-1 TAS-infecting mice and those infected with CL18 or CL19 except for CL19 on day 1.
Fig. 4

The viral titers in tears of mice inoculated with each virus clone to cornea. Mice were infected with each virus clone at the dose of 1 × 106 PFU through corneal inoculation. Tears were collected every day for 7-day observation period. Viral titer in tears were determined by plaque forming assay in Vero cells. All the mice inoculated with HSV-1 TAS or CL19 died within 6 and 7 days p.i., respectively

Discussion

The results in the present study indicated that vTK-associated ACVr mutants showed lower virulence and pathogenicity as reported previously [11, 12, 1417]. However, the mechanism of the reduced virulence of the vTK-associated ACVr HSV-1 was not simple in terms of the level of virulence and replication capacity, which were influenced by the route and method of infection, in vivo.

The ACVr mutants with relatively higher susceptibility to ACV retained higher virulence (Figs. 2 and 3), although there was no significant relationship between intracerebral-LD50 and vTK activity (Table 2). It indicates that the virulence and pathogenicities are not simply associated with the vTK activity level. In fact, CL19, whose vTK activity was only 1.4% to that of HSV-1 TAS, was more virulent than CL18, whose vTK activity was 94% to that of HSV-1 TAS, when inoculated both through intracerebral and corneal routes (Figs. 2 and 3) [21]. It was reported that vTK-associated ACVr HSV-1 mutant with high vTK activity retained a similar virulence to the parent HSV-1, when inoculated intracerebrally [11]. Harris et al reported that the pathogenicity and the reactivation capability of the majority of vTK-associated ACVr HSV-1 clinical isolates demonstrated low neurovirulence [12]. A unique vTK-deficient ACVr HSV-1 due to a double G insertion in the 7 G-homopolymer stretch in vTK gene showed a relatively higer virulence and reactivation capabiligy from letencey [12, 19]. The mechanism behind the higher pathogenicity was to due to an additional single G-insertion into the G-homopolymer stretch, resulting in the restoration of the vTK open reading frame in vivo [19]. These results suggest that the characteristics of the vTK-associated ACVr HSV-1 in terms of the mutations in the vTK gene and fitness in vivo are the factors for the virulence. Another explanation for the discrepancy between the vTK activity and the virulence might be the method of measuring vTK activities. The vTK activities were measured using the 143B/TK- neo R cell extracts infected with each clone without purification of the vTK protein [21], as the vTK activities were measured for the cell extracts infected with each HSV-1 [1113, 15], while they were measured for the purified vTK of each HSV-1 [8].

Similar discussion is required for CL24, whose vTK activity maintained about one-fourth of the vTK activity of HSV-1 TAS, showed higher attenuation than that of CL19, whose vTK activity was only 1.4% to that of HSV-1 TAS. To confirm the results that CL19 was more virulent than CL18 and that CL24 showed higher attenuation than CL19 should be studied with using the recombinant HSV-1 with each mutation in vTK genetically engineered.

When the peripheral (corneal) virulence of the ACVr HSV-1 clones were measured, it was demonstrated that the ACVr HSV-1 clones with some degree of vTK activities (CL18, CL22, and CL24) induced local lesions, but the vTK-deficient CL1 did not as reported previously (Fig. 3) [27]. The results suggest that vTK-associated ACVr HSV-1 due to a single amino acid substitution remained peripheral virulence in mice. Further study is needed to clarify whether the peripheral virulence of the single amino acid-substitution based ACVr HSV-1 maintained in humans or not.

To evaluate the replication capacity of vTK-associated ACVr HSV-1 at the site (cornea) of virus inoculation, virus titers in tears of mice inoculated with each of HSV-1 clones through corneal inoculation were measured (Fig. 4). The virus load kinetics in tears of HSV-1 CL18 and CL19 were almost the same as that of HSV-1 TAS (Fig. 4). The mechanism behind the difference in virus load kinetics between relatively less ACVr HSV-1 (CL18 and CL19) inclusing HSV-1 TAS and relatively higly ACVr clones (CL22, CL24, and CL1) can be discussed as follows. All the HSV-1 replicated at the site of infection with the same replication capacity until day 2 post infection. The virus replicated at the site would be transported to ganglions from the inoculation sites, and the virus transported to trigeminal ganglion might replicate in the ganglions [24]. The virus replicated in trigeminal ganglion might be then transported back to peripheral tissues or forward to the brain. The mechanism of high virus titer-maintenance in tears of mice inoculated with TAS, CL18, or CL19 from day 3 to day 7 might be due to the high replication capacity at the local site of inoculation and/or high replication capacity in trigeminal ganglia with an ategrade return of the virus replicated in trigeminal ganglia. It is speculated that the relatively higly ACVr clones (CL22, CL24, and CL1) lacks or have reduced replication capacity in trigeminal ganglia. It was reported that a vTK-deficient HSV-1, which should be ACVr, showed a significantly reduced replication capacity in trigeminal ganglia of mice [28]. This result suggests that CL1 did not replicate in the trigeminal ganglia, when mice were inoculated with CL1 through corneal route. Therefore, the CL1 titer in tears collected from mice corneally inoculated with CL1 decreased after day 3 post infection (Fig. 4). However, the kinetics of the partially vTK-positive CL22 and CL24 were the same kinetic as that of CL1 (Fig. 4). These results also suggest that the replication capacities of vTK-associated ACVr HSV-1 are not regulated solely by the vTK activitiy of the vTK-associated ACVr HSV-1. The replication capacity in trigeminal ganglia of each clone should be assessed to support this speculation.

One of the limitations in this study is that the number of HSV-1 clones (one ACVs HSV-1 and 5 ACVr HSV-1 clones) used was small. Therefore, there is a room for discussion that the conclusion, “The higher the level of ACV-resistance, the lower the virulence in mice”, is still suggestive. Although the number of ACVr HSV-1 clones seems to be small, the sensitivity of these 5 ACVr HSV-1 and ACVs HSV-1 TAS to ACV varied, ranging from approximately 1 μg/ml to over 100 μg/ml. These clones with a variety of ACV-sensitivity were selected from those generated in the previous study [21]. To our knowledge, there have been no reports, in which virulence of several vTK-associated ACVr HSV-1 clones was assessed with ACV-sensitivity, mutations in the vTK, and vTK activities. Therefore, the number of ACVr HSV-1 clones (5) used in this single study is considered acceptable for obtaining the conclusions. Second limitation is that the capacity of replication and establishment of latency in trigeminal ganglia for each clone was not evaluated. To clarify the mechanism behind the difference in virulence (disease severities) among these clones, the capacity of replication and establishment of latency in trigeminal ganglia for each clone should be evaluated in detail. Third limitation in this study might be that recombinant HSV-1 with each amino acid mutation in the vTK gene genetically engineered was not included to exclude the possibility that other factors except for vTK mutations contributed to the difference in the virulence.

Conclusions

There was a statistically significant correlation between the virulence and the susceptibility to ACV among ACVr HSV-1 clones, suggesting the higher the sensitivity to ACV, the higher the virulence. Single amino acid substitution-based vTK-associated ACVr HSV-1 infection induced local skin lesions, dermatitis and keratitis, in mice, while completely vTK-deficient ACVr HSV-1 did not.

Abbreviations

HSV-1: 

Herpes simplex virus type 1

IC50

50% inhibitory concentrations

LD50

50% lethal dose

vTK: 

viral thymidine kinase

Declarations

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Ms. Yoshiko Fukui and Ms. Mihoko Tsuda for their excellent technical assistance in this study.

Funding

This study was supported by Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (No.15 K09675 and No.24591591).

Authors' contributions

NO, HT, and MSa designed expetiments; NO, HF, TY, SY, SH, TI, and MSh carried out expetiments. NO, HF, and MSa analyzed expetimental data and results. NO, HF, and MSa wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Ethics approval

All animal experiments were approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee of the NIID and were carried out in accordance with the approved guidelines.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Virology 1, National Institute of Infectious Diseases
(2)
Department of Life Science and Medical Bioscience, Waseda University

References

  1. Elion GB. Acyclovir: discovery, mechanism of action, and selectivity. J Med Virol. 1993;Suppl 1:2–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Gaudreau A, Hill E, Balfour Jr HH, Erice A, Boivin G. Phenotypic and genotypic characterization of acyclovir-resistant herpes simplex viruses from immunocompromised patients. J Infect Dis. 1998;178:297–303.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Stranska R, Schuurman R, Nienhuis E, Goedegebuure IW, Polman M, Weel JF, et al. Survey of acyclovir-resistant herpes simplex virus in the Netherlands: prevalence and characterization. J Clin Virol. 2005;32:7–18.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Christophers J, Clayton J, Craske J, Ward R, Collins P, Trowbridge M, et al. Survey of resistance of herpes simplex virus to acyclovir in northwest England. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1998;42:868–72.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Morfin F, Thouvenot D. Herpes simplex virus resistance to antiviral drugs. J Clin Virol. 2003;26:29–37.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Sauerbrei A, Deinhardt S, Zell R, Wutzler P. Phenotypic and genotypic characterization of acyclovir-resistant clinical isolates of herpes simplex virus. Antiviral Res. 2010;86:246–52.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Bestman-Smith J, Schmit I, Papadopoulou B, Boivin G. Highly reliable heterologous system for evaluating resistance of clinical herpes simplex virus isolates to nucleoside analogues. J Virol. 2001;75:3105–10.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Larder BA, Cheng YC, Darby G. Characterization of abnormal thymidine kinases induced by drug-resistant strains of herpes simplex virus type 1. J Gen Virol. 1983;64(Pt 3):523–32.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Larder BA, Darby G. Selection and characterisation of acyclovir-resistant herpes simplex virus type 1 mutants inducing altered DNA polymerase activities. Virology. 1985;146:262–71.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Sibrack CD, Gutman LT, Wilfert CM, McLaren C, St Clair MH, Keller PM, et al. Pathogenicity of acyclovir-resistant herpes simplex virus type 1 from an immunodeficient child. J Infect Dis. 1982;146:673–82.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Field HJ, Darby G. Pathogenicity in mice of strains of herpes simplex virus which are resistant to acyclovir in vitro and in vivo. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1980;17:209–16.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Harris W, Collins P, Fenton RJ, Snowden W, Sowa M, Darby G. Phenotypic and genotypic characterization of clinical isolates of herpes simplex virus resistant to aciclovir. J Gen Virol. 2003;84:1393–401.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Efstathiou S, Kemp S, Darby G, Minson AC. The role of herpes simplex virus type 1 thymidine kinase in pathogenesis. J Gen Virol. 1989;70(Pt 4):869–79.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Coen DM. Acyclovir-resistant, pathogenic herpesviruses. Trends Microbiol. 1994;2:481–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Coen DM, Kosz-Vnenchak M, Jacobson JG, Leib DA, Bogard CL, Schaffer PA, et al. Thymidine kinase-negative herpes simplex virus mutants establish latency in mouse trigeminal ganglia but do not reactivate. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1989;86:4736–40.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Chen SH, Pearson A, Coen DM. Failure of thymidine kinase-negative herpes simplex virus to reactivate from latency following efficient establishment. J Virol. 2004;78:520–3.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Field HJ, Wildy P. The pathogenicity of thymidine kinase-deficient mutants of herpes simplex virus in mice. J Hyg (Lond). 1978;81:267–77.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Hill EL, Hunter GA, Ellis MN. In vitro and in vivo characterization of herpes simplex virus clinical isolates recovered from patients infected with human immunodeficiency virus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1991;35:2322–8.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Grey F, Sowa M, Collins P, Fenton RJ, Harris W, Snowden W, et al. Characterization of a neurovirulent aciclovir-resistant variant of herpes simplex virus. J Gen Virol. 2003;84:1403–10.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Saijo M, Suzutani T, Murono K, Hirano Y, Itoh K. Recurrent aciclovir-resistant herpes simplex in a child with Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome. Br J Dermatol. 1998;139:311–4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Saijo M, Suzutani T, De Clercq E, Niikura M, Maeda A, Morikawa S, et al. Genotypic and phenotypic characterization of the thymidine kinase of ACV-resistant HSV-1 derived from an acyclovir-sensitive herpes simplex virus type 1 strain. Antiviral Res. 2002;56:253–62.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Reed LJ, Muench H. A simplemethodofestimating fifty percent endpoint. Am J Hyg. 1938;27:493–7.Google Scholar
  23. Sagou K, Imai T, Sagara H, Uema M, Kawaguchi Y. Regulation of the catalytic activity of herpes simplex virus 1 protein kinase Us3 by autophosphorylation and its role in pathogenesis. J Virol. 2009;83:5773–83.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  24. Summers BC, Margolis TP, Leib DA. Herpes simplex virus type 1 corneal infection results in periocular disease by zosteriform spread. J Virol. 2001;75:5069–75.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  25. Gangappa S, Babu JS, Thomas J, Daheshia M, Rouse BT. Virus-induced immunoinflammatory lesions in the absence of viral antigen recognition. J Immunol. 1998;161:4289–300.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Darby G, Churcher MJ, Larder BA. Cooperative effects between two acyclovir resistance loci in herpes simplex virus. J Virol. 1984;50:838–46.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  27. Griffiths A, Link MA, Furness CL, Coen DM. Low-level expression and reversion both contribute to reactivation of herpes simplex virus drug-resistant mutants with mutations on homopolymeric sequences in thymidine kinase. J Virol. 2006;80:6568–74.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  28. Jacobson JG, Chen SH, Cook WJ, Kramer MF, Coen DM. Importance of the herpes simplex virus UL24 gene for productive ganglionic infection in mice. Virology. 1998;242:161–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2017

Advertisement