Skip to main content
Download PDF

Whole-genome analysis of coxsackievirus B3 reflects its genetic diversity in China and worldwide

Virology Journal volume 19, Article number: 69 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Coxsackievirus B3 (CVB3) has emerged as an active pathogen in myocarditis, aseptic meningitis, hand, foot, and mouth disease (HFMD), and pancreatitis, and is a heavy burden on public health. However, CVB3 has not been systematically analyzed with regard to whole-genome diversity and recombination. Therefore, this study was undertaken to systematically examine the genetic characteristics of CVB3 based on its whole genome.

Methods

We combined CVB3 isolates from our national HFMD surveillance and global sequences retrieved from GenBank. Phylogenetic analysis was performed to examine the whole genome variety and recombination forms of CVB3 in China and worldwide.

Results

Phylogenetic analysis showed that CVB3 strains isolated worldwide could be classified into clusters A–E based on the sequence of the entire VP1 region. The predominant CVB3 strains in China belonged to cluster D, whereas cluster E CVB3 might be circulated globally compared to other clusters. The average nucleotide substitution rate in the P1 region of CVB3 was 4.82 × 10–3 substitutions/site/year. Myocarditis was more common with cluster A. Clusters C and D presented more cases of acute flaccid paralysis, and cluster D may be more likely to cause HFMD. Multiple recombination events were detected among CVB3 variants, and there were twenty-three recombinant lineages of CVB3 circulating worldwide.

Conclusions

Overall, this study provides full-length genomic sequences of CVB3 isolates with a wide geographic distribution over a long-term time scale in China, which will be helpful for understanding the evolution of this pathogen. Simultaneously, continuous surveillance of CVB3 is indispensable to determine its genetic diversity in China as well as worldwide.

Background

Enteroviruses (EVs) are important etiological agents that can cause a wide spectrum of diseases in young children, ranging from febrile illness, hand, foot, and mouth disease (HFMD), herpangina, encephalitis, acute flaccid paralysis (AFP), and even death [1,2,3,4]. EVs belong to the genus Enterovirus in the family Picornaviridae and order Picornavirales. Human EVs comprises four species, namely, EV-A, EV-B, EV-C, and EV-D [1,2,3,4]. To date, EV-B includes 63 serotypes, including the coxsackievirus group A (CVA, serotype 9), coxsackievirus group B (CVB, serotypes 1–6), echovirus (serotypes 1–7, 9, 11–21, 24–27, and 29–33), EV-B69, EV-B73–B75, EV-B77–B88, EV-B93, EV-B97–B98, EV-B100–B101, EV-B106–B107, and EV-B111; and non-human EVs: EV-B110, EV-B112–114 [5].

Coxsackievirus B3 (CVB3) was first reported in Connecticut, the USA in 1949, and has emerged as an active pathogen in myocarditis [6], aseptic meningitis (AM), HFMD [7, 8], and pancreatitis [9], causing a heavy burden on society. CVB3 infection is the most common cause of viral myocarditis, characterized by viral infection and myocardial inflammation [10, 11]. However, there are no vaccines or antiviral drugs available to treat CVB3 infections.

Generally, EVs were considered to have only one ORF, but a second ORF was characterized in the EV genome and its encoded protein, ORF2p [12], was found to be crucial for viral intestinal infection. In CVB3, this ORF was found to be span ATG589 nt to TGA792 nt in the prototype strain (Nancy). The first ORF encodes 11 proteins, including VP1 to VP4, 2A to 2C, and 3A to 3D. The amino acid sequence of the ORF2 product, ORF2p, is highly conserved among various EVs (EV-A, B, and C), suggesting an important role for ORF2p in EV replication or transmission.

HFMD is a viral infectious disease in young children, particularly in those younger than 5 years of age, and is associated with different types of EVs, notably enterovirus A71 (EV-A71) and Coxsackievirus A16 (CVA16) [13,14,15]. However, non-EV-A71 and non-CVA16 EVs became the dominant pathogens in the HFMD spectrum from 2013 in the mainland China [1, 3]. Similarly, CVB3 is becoming a vital pathogen in the HFMD spectrum [8]. The prevalence of HFMD caused by CVB3 also increases the risk of serious diseases such as myocarditis.

Frequent recombination events and mutations in EVs have been recognized as the main mechanisms for the high rate of evolution observed, which enables them to rapidly respond and adapt to new environmental challenges [16]. Recombination is a frequent inter- and intra-typic event in EVS and is an important cause for the emergence of new EV lineages and types [17].

Relying on our three-level HFMD surveillance laboratory network in China, we obtained temporal and geographical representative CVB3 sequences isolated from patients with HFMD and healthy children. To date, there has been no systematic analysis of the whole-genome variety and recombination forms of CVB3 in China and worldwide. Therefore, we performed a large-scale, (near) full-length genetic analysis of global and Chinese CVB3 isolates, including 26 newly sequenced samples collected extensively in the mainland of China between 2012 and 2020 CVB3 sequences retrieved from the GenBank database.

Methods

Virus isolation

Clinical specimens were collected from patients with HFMD and from healthy children in the mainland of China. The clinical specimens from patients with hand, foot and mouth disease (HFMD) were collected according to the standard protocols of the National guideline for HFMD (http://www.gov.cn/gzdt/2009-06/04/content_1332078.htm). According to the National HFMD pathogen surveillance system, which was established in 2008 in the mainland of China, HFMD cases were reported by the provincial CDC and the representative samples were sent to the national HFMD laboratory for confirmation. These representative samples sent by the provincial CDC are the source of samples for this study. Real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) was performed to screen for EV-A71, CVA16, and other EVs as previously described [10]. Non-EV-A71 and non-CVA16 EV-positive samples were selected for further analysis. All samples were processed according to the standard and previously described protocols [9]. The viruses were isolated from the original clinical specimens by propagation in human rhabdomyosarcoma (RD) and human larynx carcinoma (HEp-2) cells following conventional methods [11]. These two cell lines were obtained from the WHO Global Poliovirus Specialized Laboratory, USA, and were originally purchased from the American Type Culture Collection.

Full-length genome sequencing of CVB3 isolates

We selected the non-EV-A71 and non-CVA16 EV-positive samples, and extracted the viral RNA using a QIAamp Viral RNA Mini Kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA). Reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) was performed to amplify the entire VP1 capsid region using the PrimeScript One Step RT-PCR Kit Ver. 2 (TaKaRa, Dalian, China) and the primers E490/E492 were used to amplify a portion of the VP1 region [8]. Preparation of RT-PCR reactions and amplification profiles were based on previously reported protocols [8]. PCR products were purified using a QIAquick PCR Purification Kit (Qiagen, Germany). The amplicons were bi-directionally sequenced using an ABI 3130 Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems, USA). Sequences were analyzed using the EV Genotyping Tool and BLAST server [18]. To obtain the entire genome sequence of CVB3, specific primers were used based on a previous study [8]. The obtained sequences were deposited in GenBank under the accession numbers OK632332–OK632353, OK643871–OK643874, OK643877–OK643882. The CVB3 strains used in this study were isolated between 2012 and 2020. Twenty-six samples isolated between 2012 and 2020 were identified as CVB3. The geographic distribution map of CVB3 isolates from the mainland China was obtained from Highcharts (Grant number: 0321912045738052).

Phylogenetic analysis of CVB3 sequences

Alignment of the nucleotide sequences from CVB3 strains was performed using the BioEdit sequence alignment editor software (version 5.0). Maximum likelihood (ML) trees were estimated using the best-fit Tamura-Nei model (TN93) + Gamma (G) parameter model of nucleotide substitution in MEGA software (version 5.03). Branch lengths of the dendrogram were determined based on the tree topology and the majority rule consensus of 1000 bootstrap replicates. Bootstrap values greater than 70% were considered statistically significant for grouping. The consensus principle of EV genogrouping is at least 15% of the difference in the entire VP1 nucleotide sequences. The global evolutionary dynamics of CVB3 were inferred based on the entire P1 capsid region. The correlation coefficient and regression value of each dataset were calculated using TempEst (v1.5.1) to estimate the correlation between sequence divergence and the date of isolation in each dataset [19]. The Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) method implemented in BEAST (v1.7.5) was used to estimate the temporal phylogenies and rates of evolution [20]. All 84 P1 region sequences were analyzed using the uncorrected relaxed molecular clock (exponential) and constant site tree prior to the GTR + G + I nucleotide substitution model. A Bayesian MCMC run comprised 3 × 108 generations to ensure that each parameter could converge. The sampling frequency was set to 3 × 104 generations. The output from BEAST was analyzed using TRACER (v1.7.1) (http://beast.community/tracer) (with estimated sample size (ESS) values higher than 200). A maximum clade credibility (MCC) tree was constructed using TreeAnnotator, and the burn-in option was used to remove the first 10% of the sampled trees; the resulting tree was visualized using FigTree (v1.4.4).

Recombination analysis of CVB3 sequences

In this study, we scanned the entire genomic sequence of CVB3 and potential recombinants from GenBank. Briefly, the P2 and P3 coding sequences of these strains were analyzed using BLAST to compare their identity with the sequences from GenBank. Sequences with a similarity higher than 85 percent were considered potential parental sequences and were downloaded from GenBank. Similarity plots and bootscanning analyses were performed using Simplot (version 3.5.1; Stuart Ray, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA). A sliding window of 200 nucleotides was used, moving in 20-nucleotide steps, and bootscanning analyses were performed using the neighbor-joining method [21].

Results

Global CVB3 epidemiology

With the rapid development of molecular biology technologies, a cDNA copy covering two-thirds of the CVB3 genome was cloned in Sweden in 1984 [22]. In 1985, the biologically active CVB3 virus (Nancy strain) cDNA, including the entire genome, was synthesized in Germany [23]. When the full-length genome of CVB3 was first reported in 1987, the number of CVB3 isolates significantly increased. CVB3 related outbreaks have been reported frequently, such as an outbreak in southern Louisiana, USA in 1959 (51 patients) [24], an outbreak in South Africa in 1984 with a variety of clinical manifestations [25], an outbreak of herpangina in Japan in 1987[26] (22 patients), an outbreak in Thailand in 1988 [27], an October 1992 outbreak of infant infection in a hospital in Beijing (35 patients) [28], a June 2005 outbreak of neonatal infections in Taiwan, China [29], 2008 outbreaks of aseptic meningitis in Shandong Province, China (81 CVB3 isolates) [30], and Hong Kong, China (69 CVB3 isolates) [31], an outbreak of HFMD in Hebei in 2012 (35 cases), and an outbreak of HFMD in Shandong in 2016 (42 patients) [8]. During the EV-D68 outbreak in 2014 in the United States, CVB3 was the most commonly identified type of EV infection [32].

To date, CVB3 strains are associated with various diseases, and the manifestations vary from mild respiratory [33], gastrointestinal infections [34, 35], herpangina [36], and hand, foot, and mouth disease [7, 8, 37], to more severe diseases such as heart disease (including viral myocarditis [6, 38], pericarditis [39], and acute myocardial infarction [40]), CNS involvement (meningitis [30, 36, 41,42,43], meningo-cerebellitis [11], encephalitis [44], and AFP [45,46,47]), and pancreatic interrelated disease (pancreatitis [48], diabetes [49]). More seriously, the virus can cause neonatal sepsis-like illness and sudden death in infected infants [38, 50] and adults with low immune function.

Summary of CVB3 datasets

In total, 319 entire VP1 sequences (before 2021 August 31st) were collected for the CVB3 genotyping and clinical manifestations summary. The CVB3 strains isolated between 1949 (the prototype strains) and 2020 from 17 countries, included countries in Asia ( China, Japan, India, Thailand, Uzbekistan, Indonesia), Europe (Germany, France, UK, Poland, Denmark, Russia, Romania, Moldova), North America (USA), Oceania (Australia), and Africa (Madagascar), representing wide temporal and regional distributions. In total, 84 CVB3 whole genome sequences (near the whole genome) (this study, n = 26; GenBank, n = 58) were used for the analysis. The sequence information is summarized in Additional file 1: Table S1. In total, 44 CVB3 whole genome sequences (near the whole genome) were included from the mainland of China from 2001 to 2020, in 16 provinces, municipalities, and autonomous regions, representing seven administrative regions of China: Southeast China (Shandong, Jiangsu, Shanghai, Anhui, and Fujian), Central China (Hunan), South China (Guangdong), North China (Beijing and Tianjin), Northwest China (Shaanxi, Gansu, and Xinjiang), Southwest China (Sichuan, Yunnan, and Tibet), and Northeast China (Jilin) (Fig. 1). It showed that CVB3 has been widely spread in mainland of China, covering seven geographic regions and 16 out of 31 provinces (municipalities, and autonomous regions) of the mainland of China. Most patients (19/26, 73.1%) were 1 ~ 3 years old, the median age of these patients was 2.7 years old, and all severe cases (4 cases) were under 2 years old. Men are in the majority, with a ratio of 1.6:1. Nearly 9/10 (23/26, 88.5%) cases occurred between May and August, when was spring and summer time in China. CVB3 strains isolated between 1949 (the prototype strains) and 2020 were from 12 countries and regions, including the mainland of China. A flow chart to show CVB3 sequences used in this analysis was in Additional file 2: Fig. S1.

Fig. 1
figure 1

The geographical distribution whole genome of CVB3 sequences in the mainland China. Numbers in brackets represented the whole genome sequences (near the whole genome) in each provinces (municipalities, and autonomous regions) of the mainland of China

Full size image

Five clusters were assigned based on the complete VP1 coding region of CVB3 isolates

In total, 319 entire VP1 sequences were collected, including the mainland China (n = 167), Taiwan, China (n = 46), Japan (n = 3), India (n = 17), Thailand(n = 2), Uzbekistan (n = 1), Indonesia (n = 1), Germany (n = 27), France (n = 19), UK (n = 1), Poland (n = 4), Denmark (n = 1), Russia (n = 3), Romania (n = 2), Moldova (n = 1), USA (n = 8), Australia (n = 14), and Madagascar (n = 2). We divided the global CVB3 into five clusters (A–E) based on the entire VP1 sequence (Fig. 2A). The cluster mean distances varied from 16.9% (clusters C to D) to 21.5% (clusters A to C). The mean genetic distance within the cluster varied from 0.6% (cluster A) to 12.0% (cluster E), indicating the reliability of genotyping. The prototype strain Nancy, which was isolated in the USA in 1949, clustered with the strains isolated in Australia, the USA, Germany, and the mainland of China to form cluster A. Cluster B included strains isolated in the USA in 1956 and in Germany in 1999. Most Indian strains, one strain from Uzbekistan, and two from Madagascar formed cluster C. Most cluster D strains were isolated in China. Cluster E comprised strains isolated from 14 countries, suggesting that cluster E might be transmitted globally. Notably, the Chinese isolates fell into clusters A, D, and E. Cluster D CVB3 was first isolated from cases of acute flaccid paralysis in 1990 and has persistently circulated in the mainland of China from 1993 to 2017, suggesting strong transmission potential. We found that the dominant cluster D had a wide temporal and geographical distribution, whereas cluster A disappeared after 2014. Emerging cluster E was only detected among HFMD cases in 2020 in one province and was possibly imported from other countries. The basic data for each cluster are summarized in Table 1. The phylogenetic analysis of CVB3 based on the ORF1sequences (near the whole genome) was also constructed, and distinct difference was not observed compared with the VP1 tree. The five clusters could also be seen in the ORF1sequences phylogenetic trees (Additional file 3: Fig. S2).

Fig. 2
figure 2

The genetic diversity and clinical manifestations distribution of CVB3 worldwide as determined in this study. A The maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree based on the entire VP1 genome of 319 CVB3 genome sequences for cluster division. B The maximum clade credibility (MCC) phylogenetic tree based on the entire P1 coding region of 77 CVB3 strains around the world. C The distribution of diseases caused by CVB3 in different clusters. The numbers of disease cases in each cluster are indicated by in the bar chart

Full size image
Table 1 Information of 5 clusters CVB3s relying on entire VP1 sequences
Full size table

To investigate the evolutionary history of CVB3, MCC trees (Fig. 2B) were constructed based on the entire P1 nucleotide sequence of CVB3 strains (n = 77). The correlation coefficient was 0.74 and the R2 value was 0.54. A positive correlation was observed between genetic divergence and sampling time. The average nucleotide substitution rate for the P1 coding region in all CVB3 strains worldwide was 4.82 × 10–3 substitutions/site/year (95% HPD, 3.51 × 10–3–6.05 × 10–3), which is slightly higher compared to the P1 evolutionary rate of CV-A6 reported by others [1], indicating its rapid spreading rate. The topological structure of the MCC tree constructed using BEAST was nearly identical to that of the ML tree constructed using MEGA software. Based on our analysis, the estimated TMRCA of CVB3 was in the early 1900s, corresponding to at least 40 years before the first reported detection of CVB3 in 1949. Global CVB3 strains isolated since 1903 formed two branches. Branch 1 included only cluster A, which arose in 1946, including the prototype strain Nancy. Branch 2 included cluster B, cluster C with a tMRCA that emerged in 1990, cluster D (emerged in approximately 1994), and cluster E emerging in 1982.

We also focused on the clinical manifestations of different clusters. Myocarditis (41.7%) was more common in cluster A than that in the other clusters. Cluster C (40%) and cluster D (31.4%) presented more cases of AFP compared to the other clusters. In addition, while comparing the numbers (n = 65) and proportions (31.9%) of HFMD cases among the five clusters in this study, we found that cluster D may be more likely to cause HFMD. The most common diseases in cluster E were HFMD (9.9%), diabetes (9.9%), and aseptic meningitis (8.6%) (Fig. 2C).

Full-length genome analysis of CVB3 exhibited diverse recombination lineages in China and worldwide

Phylogenetic trees were constructed based on the entire P1, P2, and P3 region nucleotide sequences of CVB3 strains along with the prototype of EV-B from GenBank database. Consistent with the phylogenetic tree of the VP1 coding region, the P1 phylogenetic tree (Fig. 3A) indicated the existence of the five CVB3 clusters in the world as expected, verifying the primary genotyping results. Unlike the P1 phylogenetic trees, those of the P2 and P3 non-structural regions showed that several independent lineages clustered with the prototype strains of other EV-B prototypes rather than with the prototype of CVB3, suggesting the occurrence of recombination between CVB3 and other EV-B serotypes (Fig. 3B, C).The CVB3 whole genomes displayed significant genetic diversity in the non-structural regions, and a total of twenty-three recombinant lineages were detected (Table 2). We named the recombinant lineages based on their first isolation time. Clusters A and B had only one lineage each, consistent with the VP1 region phylogenic tree. Cluster C contained three lineages: lineage F, lineage O1, and lineage O2. Cluster D isolates were differentiated into lineage G, lineage K, lineage L, lineage M, lineage R, lineage S1, lineage S2, lineage T, and lineage U, suggesting that at least nine different CVB3 recombinant lineages are circulating in China. Cluster E was separated into independent lineages by other EV-B prototype strains, including lineages C, D, E, H, I, J, N, P, and Q. Some recombinant lineages, such as lineages B–F, are ancient lineages from the last century and tend to be absent. The recombinant lineage J was associated with cluster E, which clearly covered several countries and was spread extensively. The diverse recombinant lineages were certified by bootscanning analyses using ORF1 sequences (Fig. 3D). The intra-lineage nucleotide similarity of lineages A, I, J, K, L, O1, O2, R, S, U, and T was between 95.8–99.9%, indicating that all the strains in the same lineage displayed high intra-lineage homology throughout the ORF1 sequences. However, when all the lineages were considered together, the diversity was obviously higher in the non-capsid regions (Fig. 3E).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Neighbor-joining phylogenetic trees of 84 global CVB3 constructed based on the coding regions. A P1 capsid region. B P2 non-structural region. C P3 non-structural region. The lineages are differentiated by distinct colors. D The diverse recombinant lineages were certified based on ORF1 sequences using bootscanning analyses. The prototype Nancy of CVB3 from lineage A was labelled red as reference. E Inter-lineage pairwise similarity comparison of main lineages circulating in the mainland China based on ORF1 sequences using sliding window nucleotide similarity analysis with a 200-nt window moving in 20-nt steps

Full size image
Table 2 Information of 23 recombinant lineages of CVB3s based on P2 and P3 non-structural region sequences
Full size table

Previous studies have shown that EV-Bs are more susceptible to recombination compared to EV-As [51]. Regarding CVB3, many recombinant lineages, which have persisted for many years and were widespread, are still globally active. For example, lineage J included 11 strains showing high sequence identity with each other. The P2 and P3 non-structural coding region of lineage J, which clustered with the E18 (MG720260) and E30 (EF066392) strains, exhibit recombination activities in the evolutionary process of CVB3 (Fig. 4A). Furthermore, the non-structural genomic region of lineage L was found to have recombination breakpoints with three different EV-B serotypes: E25 (KJ957190) and E30 (KF878942) strains; in contrast, the P1 coding region showed higher similarity with the CVB3 prototype strain (Fig. 4B). Lineage O1 showed a complex recombination with the EVB88 (MH144607, MH118025) strains in the whole P3 region (Fig. 4C). Lineage U showed obvious recombination events, corresponding to the CVB5 (JN695051) and E30 (KF878942) strains (Fig. 4D). Therefore, the other serotypes of EV-Bs, such as echovirus (E18, E25, and E30), CVB5, and novel EV-B88 play important roles in the natural recombination of CVB3. These results indicate that inter-serotype recombination events occurred in the non-structural coding region of CVB3. The current circulating CVB3 strains are recombinants; however, the exact source of recombinant fragments was not identified; therefore, further studies are still needed to determine the EV serotype circulating simultaneously.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Similarity plots were constructed for detecting potential recombination detection among the screened EV-B strains and A lineage J, B lineage L, C lineage O1, and D lineage U

Full size image

Discussion

In addition to EV-A71, CVA16, CVA6, and CVA10, other EVs also account for sporadic cases of HFMD and occasional outbreak events. CVB3, which was previously detected infrequently, was recently identified as a pathogen causing HFMD outbreaks [7, 8]. Persistent outbreaks of HFMD have been causing emerging nationwide epidemics since 2007; therefore, systematic national EV surveillance is needed to comprehensively study EV pathogens. With our continuous surveillance data on CVB3-related HFMD cases collected over a 10-year period, we performed a systematic analysis of CVB3 full-length genomic characteristics and recombination forms.

EVs are characterized by their high evolutionary rates, which are largely attributed to the low fidelity of replication with error-prone RNA polymerases. The evolutionary mechanisms of EVs include mutation and recombination. Genetic mutations can change the pathogenicity, antigenicity, and host range; further, recombination occurs extremely frequently, allowing independent evolution of EV genome fragments [52].

CVB3 can cause various human diseases, implying multiple strains with different virulence in a single serotype. Previous studies on CVB3 with clinical descriptions indicated a potential correlation between clinical phenotypes and genetic mutations. Nucleotide substitutions in the coding region and non-coding region are reported to be related to the virulence of CVB3, and can change the degree of damage to the organs. One study identified two differences among nucleotides in untranslated regions and 8 amino acid differences in the coding regions relative to the cardiovirulent CVB3 strains. It is reported that the mutation of amino acids in P126M and D155G in the VP1 region may lead to the attenuation of CVB3 without myocardial injury [53]. Other data indicate that amino acids at positions 124–241 of VP1 in CVB3 are very important in protecting mice from death [52]. Thus, CVB3 strains can be divided into cardiovirulent strains (that are pathogenic for both the murine heart and the pancreas), pancreovirulent strains (that are pathogenic for the pancreas), and non-pathogenic strains. We compared the nucleotide and amino acid mutations across the entire VP1 region in different clusters. The results showed that the amino acid positions of 110 (χ2 = 449.45, P < 0.001) and 223 (χ2 = 124.54, P < 0.001) were significantly different among the five clusters (Fig. 5). Whether the two mutations are correlated with different types of diseases among different clusters requires further experimental research. Therefore, our further study will focus on the experimental models to precisely identify the functions of the two amino acids.

Fig. 5
figure 5

The amino acid positions of 110 (A) and 223 (B) in the VP1 region among 5 cluster CVB3 strains

Full size image

Intratypic and intertypic forms of homologous recombination are also thought to be relatively frequent evolutionary forces that affect enteroviral genomes. Although the number of whole genomes was limited, we could still find the recombination diversity in global CVB3 sequences. We allocated the worldwide CVB3 variants to twenty-three different evolutionary recombinant lineages based on non-capsid sequences. Several previous studies showed that Chinese CVB3 showed the highest similarity with the parental CVB3 in the P1 region, with the E25 strain in the P2-P3 region, and other strains of CVB3 showed similarity with CVB5 in the P3 region [54, 55], which is consistent with our study. However, it remains unclear whether there are substantial differences in recombination frequencies between different EVs such as echoviruses, and whether CVB5 plays a major role in the natural recombination of CVB3.

Previous studies on EVs, such as CVA6 [1], indicated a potential correlation between clinical phenotypes and recombination. Our research does have some limitations, as there is a limited number of CVB3 sequences in each lineage, and 13 lineages have only one sequence. Therefore, we could not analyze the potential correlation between the pathogenicity and genetic recombination of CVB3.

Conclusions

Overall, this study summarized the global CVB3 genetic diversity in both the VP1 region and the whole genome, and the database provided insight into the global phylogenetic characteristics of CVB3. The complete genome analysis provided more comprehensive and detailed information compared to that based only on the VP1 region. With more than half a century’s circulation, different clusters CVB3 had caused several outbreaks. Our results indicated a potential correlation between clinical phenotypes and genetic diversity. Therefore, continued surveillance is necessary to understand the complete genetic diversity of CVB3 in the mainland China as well as worldwide.

Availability of data and materials

The CVB3 nucleotide sequences determined in this study have been deposited in the GenBank nucleotide sequence database under accession numbers OK632332– OK632353, OK643871–OK643874, OK643877–OK643882.

Abbreviations

EV:

Enterovirus

HFMD:

Hand, foot, and mouth disease

AFP:

Acute flaccid paralysis

CVB3:

Coxsackievirus B3

AM:

Aseptic meningitis

RT-PCR:

Real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction

RD:

Rhabdomyosarcoma

HEp-2:

Human larynx carcinoma

MCMC:

Markov chain Monte Carlo

MCC:

Maximum clade credibility

References

  1. Song Y, Zhang Y, Han Z, Xu W, Xiao J, Wang X, et al. Genetic recombination in fast-spreading coxsackievirus A6 variants: a potential role in evolution and pathogenicity. Virus Evol. 2020;6:2. https://doi.org/10.1093/ve/veaa048.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Chen J, Han Z, Wu H, Xu W, Yu D, Zhang Y. A large-scale outbreak of echovirus 30 in Gansu Province of China in 2015 and Its phylodynamic characterization. Front Microbiol. 2020;11:1137.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Han Z, Song Y, Xiao J, Jiang L, Huang W, Wei H, et al. Genomic epidemiology of coxsackievirus A16 in mainland of China, 2000–18. Virus Evol. 2020;6:2. https://doi.org/10.1093/ve/veaa084.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Suresh S, Forgie S, Robinson J. Non-polioEnterovirus detection with acute flaccid paralysis: a systematic review. J Med Virol. 2018;90:3–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Simmonds P, Gorbalenya AE, Harvala H, Hovi T, Knowles NJ, Lindberg AM, et al. Recommendations for the nomenclature of enteroviruses and rhinoviruses. Arch Virol. 2020;165:793–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Fairweather D, Stafford KA, Sung YK. Update on coxsackievirus B3 myocarditis. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2012;24:401–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Fu X, Mao L, Wan Z, Xu R, Ma Y, Shen L, et al. High proportion of coxsackievirus B3 genotype A in hand, foot and mouth disease in Zhenjiang, China, 2011–2016. Int J Infect Dis. 2019;87:1–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Han Z, Zhang Y, Huang K, Wang J, Tian H, Song Y, et al. Two Coxsackievirus B3 outbreaks associated with hand, foot, and mouth disease in China and the evolutionary history worldwide. BMC Infect Dis. 2019;19:466.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Simonen-Tikka ML, Pflueger M, Klemola P, Savolainen-Kopra C, Smura T, Hummel S, et al. Human enterovirus infections in children at increased risk for type 1 diabetes: the Babydiet study. Diabetologia. 2011;54:2995–3002.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Rose NR. Viral myocarditis. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2016;28:383–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Garmaroudi FS, Marchant D, Hendry R, Luo H, Yang D, Ye X, et al. Coxsackievirus B3 replication and pathogenesis. Future Microbiol. 2015;10:629–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Guo H, Li Y, Liu G, Jiang Y, Shen S, Bi R, et al. A second open reading frame in human enterovirus determines viral replication in intestinal epithelial cells. Nat Commun. 2019;10:4066.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Zhang Y, Zhu Z, Yang W, Ren J, Tan X, Wang Y, et al. An emerging recombinant human enterovirus 71 responsible for the 2008 outbreak of hand foot and mouth disease in Fuyang city of China. Virol J. 2010;7:94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Zhang Y, Wang D, Yan D, Zhu S, Liu J, Wang H, et al. Molecular evidence of persistent epidemic and evolution of subgenotype B1 coxsackievirus A16-associated hand, foot, and mouth disease in China. J Clin Microbiol. 2010;48:619–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Zhang Y, Wang J, Guo W, Wang H, Zhu S, Wang D, et al. Emergence and transmission pathways of rapidly evolving evolutionary branch C4a strains of human enterovirus 71 in the Central Plain of China. PLoS ONE. 2011;6:e27895.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Kyriakopoulou Z, Pliaka V, Amoutzias GD, Markoulatos P. Recombination among human non-polio enteroviruses: implications for epidemiology and evolution. Virus Genes. 2015;50:177–88.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Mandary M, Poh C. Changes in the EV-A71 genome through recombination and spontaneous mutations: impact on virulence. Viruses. 2018;10:320.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Kroneman A, Vennema H, Deforche K, Avoort HVD, Peñaranda S, Oberste MS, et al. An automated genotyping tool for enteroviruses and noroviruses. J Clin Virol. 2011;51:121–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Rambaut A, Lam TT, Max Carvalho L, Pybus OG. Exploring the temporal structure of heterochronous sequences using TempEst (formerly Path-O-Gen). Virus Evol. 2016;2:1. https://doi.org/10.1093/ve/vew007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Drummond AJ, Rambaut A. BEAST: Bayesian evolutionary analysis by sampling trees. BMC Evol Biol. 2007;7:214.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Salminen MO, Carr JK, Burke DS, McCutchan FE. Identification of breakpoints in intergenotypic recombinants of HIV type 1 by bootscanning. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 1995;11:1423–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Stålhanske PO, Lindberg AM, Pettersson U. Replicase gene of coxsackievirus B3. J Virol. 1984;51:742–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kandolf R, Hofschneider PH. Molecular cloning of the genome of a cardiotropic Coxsackie B3 virus: Full-length reverse-transcribed recombinant cDNA generates infectious virus in mammalian cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1985;82:4818–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Clemmer DI, Li F, Le Blanc DR, Fox JP. An outbreak of subclinical infection with coxsackievirus B3 in southern lousiana. Am J Epidemiol. 1966;83(1):123–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Rossouw E, Tsilimigras CW, Schoub BD. Molecular epidemiology of a coxsackievirus B3 outbreak. J Med Virol. 1991;34:165–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Nakayama T, Urano T, Osano M, Hayashi Y, Sekine S, Ando T, Makinom S. Outbreak of herpangina associated with Coxsackievirus B3 infection. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1989;8:495–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Dechkum N, Pangsawan Y, Jayavasu C, Saguanwongse S. Coxsackie B virus infection and myopericarditis in Thailand, 1987–1989. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 1998;29:273–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Wu Z, Du J, Zhang T, Xue Y, Yang F, Jin Q. Recombinant human coxsackievirus B3 from children with acute myocarditis in China. J Clin Microbiol. 2013;51:3083–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Tseng F, Huang H, Chi C, Lin T, Liu C, Jian J, et al. Epidemiological survey of enterovirus infections occurring in Taiwan Between 2000 and 2005: analysis of sentinel physician surveillance data. J Med Virol. 2007;79:1850–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Tao Z, Song Y, Li Y, Liu Y, Jiang P, Lin X, et al. Coxsackievirus B3, Shandong Province, China, 1990–2010. Emerg Infect Dis. 2012;18:1865–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Wong AH, Lau CS, Cheng PKC, Ng AYY, Lim WWL. Coxsackievirus B3-associated aseptic meningitis: An emerging infection in Hong Kong. J Med Virol. 2011;83:483–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Prill MM, Dahl RM, Midgley CM, Chern SW, Lu X, Feikin DR, et al. Severe respiratory illness associated with rhinovirus during the enterovirus D68 outbreak in the United States, August 2014–November 2014. Clin Infect Dis. 2018;66:1528–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Baertl S, Pietsch C, Maier M, Hönemann M, Bergs S, Liebert UG. Enteroviruses in respiratory samples from paediatric patients of a tertiary care hospital in Germany. Viruses. 2021;13:882.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Machado RS, de Sousa IP Jr, Monteiro JC, Ferreira JL, Dos Santos Alves JC, Tavares FN. Detection and identification of enteroviruses circulating in children with acute gastroenteritis in Pará State, Northern Brazil (2010–2011). Virol J. 2020;17:156.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Chansaenroj J, Tuanthap S, Thanusuwannasak T, Duang-in A, Klinfueng S, Thaneskongtong N, et al. Human enteroviruses associated with and without diarrhea in Thailand between 2010 and 2016. PLoS ONE. 2017;12(7):e182078.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Lee CJ, Huang YC, Yang S, Tsao KC, Chen CJ, Hsieh YC, et al. Clinical features of coxsackievirus A4, B3 and B4 infections in children. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e87391.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Duong V, Mey C, Eloit M, Zhu H, Danet L, Huang Z, et al. Molecular epidemiology of human enterovirus 71 at the origin of an epidemic of fatal hand, foot and mouth disease cases in Cambodia. Emerg Microbes Infect. 2016;5:e104–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Smets K, Keymeulen A, Wollants E, Lagrou K, Van Ranst M, Padalko E. Detection of enteroviral RNA on Guthrie card dried blood of a neonate with fatal Coxsackie B3 myocarditis on day 17. J Clin Virol. 2008;42:207–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Calderón KI, Díaz-de Cerio M, Otero A, Muñoz-Almagro C, Rabella N, Martínez-Rienda I, et al. Molecular epidemiology of coxsackievirus B3 infection in Spain, 2004–2014. Arch Virol. 2016;161:1365–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Andréoletti L, Ventéo L, Douche-Aourik F, Canas F, de la Grandmaison GL, Jacques J, et al. Active coxsackieviral B infection is associated with disruption of dystrophin in endomyocardial tissue of patients who died suddenly of acute myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;50:2207–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Zhang W, Lin X, Jiang P, Tao Z, Liu X, Ji F, et al. Complete genome sequence of a coxsackievirus B3 recombinant isolated from an aseptic meningitis outbreak in eastern China. Arch Virol. 2016;161:2335–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Mirand A, Henquell C, Archimbaud C, Chambon M, Charbonne F, Peigue-Lafeuille H, et al. Prospective identification of enteroviruses involved in meningitis in 2006 through direct genotyping in cerebrospinal fluid. J Clin Microbiol. 2008;46:87–96.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Mirand A, Henquell C, Archimbaud C, Chambon M, Charbonne F, Peigue-Lafeuille H, et al. Prospective of enteroviruses involved in meningitis in 2006 through direct genotyping in cerebrospinal fluid. J Clin Microbiol. 2008;46:87–96.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Ai J, Xie Z, Liu G, Chen Z, Yang Y, Li Y, et al. Etiology and prognosis of acute viral encephalitis and meningitis in Chinese children: a multicentre prospective study. BMC Infect Dis. 2017;17:494.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Fernandez-Garcia MD, Kebe O, Fall AD, Ndiaye K. Identification and molecular characterization of non-polio enteroviruses from children with acute flaccid paralysis in West Africa, 2013–2014. Sci Rep. 2017;7:3808.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Bingjun T, Yoshida H, Yan W, Lin L, Tsuji T, Shimizu H, et al. Molecular typing and epidemiology of non-polio enteroviruses isolated from Yunnan Province, the People’s Republic of China. J Med Virol. 2008;80:670–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Sadeuh-Mba SA, Kavunga-Membo H, Joffret M, Yogolelo R, Endegue-Zanga MC, Bessaud M, et al. Genetic landscape and macro-evolution of co-circulating Coxsackieviruses A and Vaccine-derived Polioviruses in the Democratic Republic of Congo, 2008–2013. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2019;13:e7335.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Yan K, Yang J, Qian Q, Xu D, Liu H, Wei L, et al. Pathogenic role of an IL-23/γδT17/neutrophil axis in coxsackievirus B3-induced pancreatitis. J Immunol. 2019;203:3301–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Viskari H, Knip M, Tauriainen S, Huhtala H, Veijola R, Ilonen J, et al. Maternal enterovirus infection as a risk factor for type 1 diabetes in the exposed offspring. Diabetes Care. 2012;35:1328–32.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Ronellenfitsch S, Tabatabai J, Böttcher S, Diedrich S, Frommhold D, Schubert-Bast S, et al. First report of a Chinese strain of coxsackie B3 virus infection in a newborn in Germany in 2011: a case report. J Med Case Rep. 2014;8:164.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Lukashev AN, Lashkevich VA, Ivanova OE, Koroleva GA, Hinkkanen AE, Ilonen J. Recombination in circulating Human enterovirus B: independent evolution of structural and non-structural genome regions. J Gen Virol. 2005;86:3281–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Lukashev AN. Role of recombination in evolution of enteroviruses. Rev Med Virol. 2005;15:157–67.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Kim J, Jeon E, Lim B, Kim S, Chung S, Kim J, et al. Immunogenicity of a DNA vaccine for coxsackievirus B3 in mice: protective effects of capsid proteins against viral challenge. Vaccine. 2005;23:1672–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Shen H, Liu T, Luo Y, Shao S, Deng X, Wang H. Echovirus plays major roles in the natural recombination of Coxsackievirus B3. J Med Virol. 2018;90:377–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Wang H, Qian Y, Qian C, Dai C, Shen H. Two Natural Recombination gave rise to the Coxsackievirus B3 GV that triggered outbreaks in China in 2006–2012. Infect Dis Now. 2021;51:81–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to acknowledge the staffs in provincial center for disease control and prevention (CDC) for collecting specimens in this study.

Funding

This study was supported by the National key research and development project (Project No. 2021YFC0863000 and 2021YFC2302003) and the National Science and Technology Major Project of China (No.2018ZX10305409-004-002). The funding bodies were not involved in the design of the study, clinical sample collection, data analysis, or interpretation. They were also not involved in the writing of the manuscript or in the decision to publish the results.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. WHO WPRO Regional Polio Reference Laboratory, National Health Commission Key Laboratory for Medical Virology, National Institute for Viral Disease Control and Prevention, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, 155 Changbai Road, Beijing, 102206, People’s Republic of China

    Qian Yang, Dongmei Yan, Yang Song, Shuangli Zhu, Yun He, Zhenzhi Han, Dongyan Wang, Tianjiao Ji, Yong Zhang & Wenbo Xu

  2. Center for Biosafety Mega-Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, 430071, People’s Republic of China

    Yong Zhang & Wenbo Xu

  3. Shandong First Medical University & Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, 619 Changcheng Road, Taian, 271016, People’s Republic of China

    Yun He

Authors
  1. Qian Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Dongmei Yan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yang Song
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Shuangli Zhu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Yun He
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Zhenzhi Han
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Dongyan Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Tianjiao Ji
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Yong Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Wenbo Xu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

YZ and WBX conceived and designed the experiments. QY, DMY, YS, SLZ, YH, ZZH, DYW, and TJJ performed the experiments. QY analyzed the data. QY, YZ and WBX wrote the main manuscript text. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Yong Zhang or Wenbo Xu.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The present study did not involve human participants or human experiments. The only human-derived materials used were stool samples, throat swab samples, and rectal swab samples collected from patients with HFMD for public health purposes under the programs of the Ministry of Health, P. R. of China. Written informed consent for the use of clinical samples was obtained from the parents of the children enrolled in the study. This study was approved by the Ethics Review Committee (IVDC2016-004, February 2016) of the National Institute for Viral Disease Control and Prevention (IVDC), Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention. All experimental protocols were approved by the IVDC, and the procedures were performed in accordance with approved guidelines.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Table S1

. List of sequences of coxsackievirus B3 used in this analysis.

Additional file 2: Fig. S1.

A flow chart to show CVB3 sequences used in this analysis.

Additional file 3: Fig. S2.

The maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree based on the ORF1 sequences (close to the whole genome) of 84 CVB3 genome sequences.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visithttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yang, Q., Yan, D., Song, Y. et al. Whole-genome analysis of coxsackievirus B3 reflects its genetic diversity in China and worldwide. Virol J 19, 69 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12985-022-01796-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12985-022-01796-0

Keywords

  • Coxsackievirus B3 (CVB3)
  • Genome
  • Recombination lineages
  • Genetic diversity

Virology Journal

ISSN: 1743-422X