Skip to main content
Download PDF

Association between maternal hepatitis B virus carrier and gestational diabetes mellitus: a retrospective cohort analysis

Virology Journal volume 18, Article number: 226 (2021) Cite this article

Abstract

Introduction

Given that many pregnant women have chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection and that gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is linked to poor maternal and neonatal outcomes, we looked into the relationship between the hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) and GDM to see if a high HBV DNA load is linked to a higher risk of GDM in chronic maternal HBsAg carriers.

Materials and methods

Our study included 39,539 pregnant women who gave birth at the Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University in Guangzhou, China, between January 1, 2009, and December 31, 2019. The patients were divided into two groups: HBsAg negative (36,500) and positive (3039). The viral load levels of 1250 HBsAg-positive women who had tested their HBV DNA load during pregnancy were separated into three groups. We utilized univariate and multivariable logistical regression analysis to determine the relationship between maternal chronic HBsAg carrier and GDM.

Results

Being HBsAg positive was discovered to be an independent risk factor for GDM.Pre-pregnancy Obesity and advanced age were linked to an increased incidence of GDM. Those with a high HBV DNA load (> 106 IU/mL) had a higher risk of GDM than HBsAg-positive women with a low viral load (< 103 IU/mL). Pre-eclampsia and intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy (ICP) appeared to be more common in HBsAg-positive women than in uninfected women.

Conclusions

Being HBsAg positive, advanced age, and pre-pregnancy obesity were all revealed to be independent risk factors for GDM in our study. In HBsAg carrier, pregnant women, a high HBV DNA burden was linked to a greater risk of GDM. Furthermore, being an HBsAg carrier during pregnancy raised the risk of ICP and pre-eclampsia.

Introduction

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is one of the most common global public health problems, with a high mortality rate, placing a heavy burden on health systems worldwide. The global prevalence of chronic hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) varies widely, with rates ranging from 0.1 to 20% [1]. China is an intermediate endemic area for chronic HBV infection, with a rate of chronic HBsAg ranging from 5 to 6% [2,3,4]. It has been estimated that the prevalence of HBsAg among pregnant women in China varies from 6.3 to 9.4% [5,6,7]. Recent research has shown that carrying HBsAg during pregnancy increases the risk of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), but this result has not been found consistently [8,9,10,11,12,13]. Some studies have found that a high viral load is associated with a higher risk of GDM among pregnant women carrying HBsAg, but this result is inconclusive [11, 14]. GDM is a condition in which carbohydrate intolerance develops during pregnancy and is a common pregnancy complication. It has been estimated that a type of diabetes complicated 7% of pregnancies and that 86% of these women developed GDM [15]. When blood glucose levels were inadequately controlled, pregnant women with GDM increased pre-eclampsia risk and type II diabetes later in life. The offspring of pregnant women with GDM have a higher risk of developing macrosomia, neonatal hypoglycemia, and shoulder dystocia [16]. Considering many pregnant women suffer from HBV infection and GDM is related to a considerably higher risk of adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes, we completed a retrospective cohort study to explore the association of HBsAg with GDM to determine whether a high HBV DNA load is associated with a higher risk of GDM among maternal HBsAg carriers.

Methods

Database and study participants

We initially enrolled a total of 59,634 pregnant women from Guangzhou Maternal–Fetal Care Database [17] who gave birth between January 1, 2009 and December 31, 2019 at the Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University. This database includes extensive information on hospital births collated from the electronic medical record system. The records were coded by qualified medical record staff using standardized definitions [18]. The database also contains information on maternal and neonatal demographic characteristics (age, history of pregnancy, gestational age, pre-pregnancy weight, pre-pregnancy body-mass index (BMI), smoking, and alcohol drinking during pregnancy, history of polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), birth weight, Apgar score, those who delivered male infants) and pregnancy outcomes(gestational hypertension, pre-eclampsia, GDM, intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy (ICP), pre-labor rupture of membranes (PROM), polyhydramnios, oligohydramnios, and postpartum hemorrhage (PPH), preterm birth, fetal distress, asphyxia conjunctivitis, macrosomia, fetal growth restriction (FGR) or transfer to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU)). Medical conditions among mothers and neonates were coded using the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, 10th Revision (ICD-10, WHO). All individuals’ pre-pregnancy weight and height were measured, obtained from their healthcare records or self-reported, and BMI was calculated by multiplying their weight (kg) by their height squared (m2). In antepartum examinations, trained medical record personnel interviewed and recorded whether pregnant women smoked and drank alcohol during pregnancy.

We excluded 6398 participants who did not undergo a pre-pregnancy HBV serological test, 2677 women with chronic conditions (including hypertension, pre-existing diabetes mellitus, cardiac disease, and respiratory disease), and 1109 participants with other hepatitis viruses, human immunodeficiency virus, and/or treponema pallidum. We also excluded 3773 participants who had abortions; 2917 with multiple births; and 3221 women with missing data. The remaining 39,539 participants were used for the study.

Study participants were divided into two groups based on their HBsAg carrier status before pregnancy. The HBsAg negative group included 36,500 non-HBsAg carriers, and the HBsAg positive group included 3039 women with a history of HBV infection for more than 6 months, coupled with normal alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels. We measured the HBV DNA load of 3039 HBsAg-positive women in the second trimester of pregnancy. We excluded 1789 HBsAg-positive women without viral load data. The remaining 1250 HBsAg positive women were divided into three groups based on their HBV DNA load levels: < 103 IU/mL, 103–106 IU/mL, and > 106 IU/mL (Fig. 1). This study was conducted per the requirements of the Declaration of Helsinki. All participants provided informed consent, and the appropriate ethics review board approved the study design.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Profile of Study participants selection

Full size image

Outcomes

The major outcome of our study is the existence of GDM. The diagnostic criteria for GDM were defined as an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) during 24–28 weeks of gestation yielding one or more of the following results: a fasting plasma glucose level > 5.1 mM/L, a 1-h plasma glucose level > 10 mM/L, and/or a 2-h plasma glucose level > 8.5 mM/L [19].

Data analysis

In univariate analyses, continuous variables were expressed as the mean ± standard deviation and tested using t-tests. Categorical data were compared by chi-square tests. We used univariate and multivariable logistical regression analysis to define the relation between maternal chronic HBsAg carrier and GDM and reported odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We carried out all analyses on SPSS 19.0, with a significant level at P < 0.05.

Results

Of the 39,539 women enrolled in the study, 3039 (7.7%) women tested positive for HBsAg. The average age of HBsAg positive women was 30.23 ± 4.60 years, which was older than the HBsAg negative women (29.53 ± 4.38, P < 0.05). Compared with the HBsAg negative women, those infected with HBV were more likely to be over 35 years, but not significantly so (18.6% vs. 13.8%, P > 0.05). HBsAg positive women had a greater gravidity history (2.08 ± 1.25 vs. 1.82 ± 1.07, P < 0.05) and parity history (0.50 ± 0.61 vs. 0.36 ± 0.51, P < 0.05) than HBsAg negative women. More women were categorized as normal weight in the HBsAg positive group than in the HBsAg negative group (76.4% vs. 61.7%, P < 0.05). The rate of male infant birth was 58.4% for HBsAg carriers and 45.8% for non-HBsAg carriers (P < 0.05). No statistical differences were present in the other maternal and infant characteristics between the two groups (Table 1).

Table 1 Maternal and neonatal characteristics for HBsAg status
Full size table

Our study found that HBsAg-positive women had an increased risk of GDM compared to those without an HBV infection (12% vs. 9.7%, P < 0.05). HBsAg positive women appeared to have a higher risk of pre-eclampsia (3.4% vs 2.5%, P < 0.05) and ICP (1.1% vs. 0.2%, P < 0.05) than HBsAg negative women. Other pregnancy complications and neonatal outcomes had no significant discrepancy between 2 groups (Table 2). To define whether being a chronic maternal HBsAg carrier was an independent risk factor of GDM, univariate and multivariable logistical regression analyses were performed on the related risk factors of GDM, including age, multipara, pre-pregnancy BMI, HBsAg positive, smoking, and alcohol drinking during pregnancy and any history of PCOS. In the univariate logistic regression analyses, being HBsAg positive and aged ≥ 35 years were associated with a higher risk of GDM, with OR value of 1.17 (95% CI 1.11–1.23) and 1.34 (95% CI 1.17–1.54), respectively. Compared with normal-weight women, pre-pregnancy obesity was related to an increased risk of GDM (OR 2.12, 95% CI 1.26–3.57). However, there was no significant association between GDM and other factors, including multipara, smoking and alcohol drinking during pregnancy, and PCOS history (Fig. 2). The multivariable logistic regression analyses found that being HBsAg positive was an independent risk factor of GDM (OR 1.42, 95% CI 1.01–2.00). Furthermore, advanced age and pre-pregnancy obesity were independent risks of GDM after adjustment for other variables (Fig. 3).

Table 2 Maternal and neonatal outcomes for HBsAg status
Full size table
Fig. 2
figure 2

Univariate logistic regression analysis of factors related to GDM

Full size image
Fig. 3
figure 3

Multivariate logistic regression analysis of risk factors related to GDM. *Adjusted for gravidity and parity, gestational age, pre-pregnancy BMI, HBsAg carrier status. § Adjusted for age, gravidity and parity, gestational age, HBsAg carrier status. Ψ Adjusted for age, gravidity and parity, gestational age, pre-pregnancy BMI

Full size image

We performed further analyses to determine whether a high HBV DNA load was associated with a higher risk of GDM among HBsAg-positive women. In total, 1250 HBsAg positive women who had the tested HBV DNA load during pregnancy were divided into three groups based on viral load levels: low viral load (< 103 IU/mL), medium viral load (103–106 IU/mL), and high viral > 106 IU/mL. Compared with HBsAg-positive women with low viral load(< 103 IU/mL) and medium viral load(103–106 IU/mL), those with high HBV DNA load (> 106 IU/mL) had a higher incidence of GDM (Table3). Univariate and multivariable logistical regression analyses were performed to determine whether a positive relationship exists between increased HBV DNA load and elevated risk of GDM or a dose–effect relationship. In the univariate logistic regression analyses, compared to HBsAg positive women who had a low HBV DNA load (< 103 IU/mL), those who had a high viral load (> 106 IU/mL) were associated with a higher risk of GDM (OR 2.74, 95% CI 1.54–4.97). Aged ≥ 35 years was associated with an increased risk of GDM in HBsAg-positive women (OR 1.83, 95% CI 1.03–3.23) (Fig. 4). In the multivariable logistic regression analyses, we found that high HBV DNA load was an independent risk factor of GDM among HBsAg positive women, with OR values of 2.65 (95% CI 1.39–5.04) (Fig. 5).

Table 3 Maternal characteristics for HBV DNA levels of HBsAg positive women
Full size table
Fig. 4
figure 4

Univariate logistic regression analysis of factors related to GDM in positive HBsAg women

Full size image
Fig. 5
figure 5

Multivariate logistic regression analyses of risk factor related to GDM in HBsAg positive women. *Adjusted for age, pre-pregnancy BMI

Full size image

Discussion

Most pregnant women with HBV infection were classified as chronic HBsAg carriers [12]. The global prevalence of HBsAg in pregnant women has been estimated to be 5.0% [20]. In China, the prevalence of maternal HBsAg has declined in recent years; however, it was higher than the global average [21]. According to a study from 2018, the prevalence of HBsAg in pregnant women has declined from 9.8 to 6.3%, while more recent studies have reported a prevalence ranging from 7.0 to 9.4% [5,6,7]. In our retrospective cohort of 39,539 women, we found that 7.7% of pregnant women tested positive for HBsAg, consistent with the latter studies.

Recent reports have found that being a chronic HBV carrier was associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes such as GDM [22,23,24]. GDM was traditionally defined as carbohydrate intolerance of variable severity with onset or first detection during pregnancy. The latest meta-analysis from 2019 showed that 14.8% of pregnancies in China were complicated by GDM, increasing prevalence [25]. GDM was one of the most common medical complications during pregnancy, associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes, including hypertensive disorders, preterm labor, neonatal hypoglycemia, hyperbilirubinemia, and respiratory distress syndrome. It was necessary to highlight the significance of understanding risk factors and specifically modifiable factors for GDM and prevent the condition, which might lower the risk of GDM-related adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. Nowadays, the most common risk factors of GDM include older maternal age, obesity, and a family history of diabetes [26]. Whether being HBsAg positive, a history of PCOS, and smoking or alcohol consumption during pregnancy are risk factors of GDM remains uncertain.

In our retrospective cohort of 39,539 women, we found that maternal HBsAg carriers have a higher risk of GDM (12% vs. 9.7%, OR 1.42, 95% CI 1.01–2.00). Being HBsAg positive was an independent risk factor of GDM. Several studies supported this finding. Lao et al. [8] analyzed 13,683 women in Hong Kong between 1998 and 2001 and found that the rate of GDM was statistically higher in pregnancies with an HBV infection (12.4 vs. 10.2%, OR 1.24, 95% CI 1.01–1.51). In 2016, Tan et al. [10] concluded that the rate of GDM in HBsAg carriers was higher than non-HBsAg carriers (11.8 vs. 8.2%, OR 1.41, 95% CI 1.15–1.74) in a case–control study 22,374 Chinese women. The latest meta-analysis from 2018 demonstrated that women with HBV infection had an increased risk of GDM (6.48% vs. 3.41%, OR 1.35, 95% CI 1.17–1.56) [11]. However, a few previous studies have shown the connection between maternal HBV infection and the development of GDM to be insignificant. Reddick et al. [12] showed that the incidence of GDM among HBsAg positive women (4.4%) was similar to that of HBsAg negative women (2.5%, P > 0.05). Cui et al. [13] found the incidence of GDM between the HBV infected women and non-HBV women to be insignificant (1.17% vs. 1.13%, P > 0.05) in a prospective cohort study involving 21,004 pregnant women. Furthermore, our study found that older maternal age and obesity were associated with a higher risk of GDM, consistent with the previous studies.

The potential mechanism for the correlation between HBsAg and GDM is unclear. The liver is an important organ that handles liver glucose metabolism and the development of insulin resistance. Liver disease and inflammation caused by HBV during pregnancy may lead to reduced insulin sensitivity [27]. Another mechanism could be that HBV-infected pregnant women display a spontaneously increased production of tumor necrosis factor-alpha, which contributes to insulin resistance leading to the development of GDM [28, 29].

Additionally, we found that a high HBV DNA load (> 106 IU/mL) was an independent risk factor of GDM among HBsAg-positive pregnant women. A recent meta-analysis supported our finding. The latter study found that HBsAg positive had a 47% higher risk of developing GDM than HBV negative women, associated with HBV serological markers, including HBV DNA load [11]. However, Peng et al. found that HBV infection during pregnancy was an independent risk factor for GDM, but the phenomenon is not related to viral activity such as hepatitis B e-antigen status and viral load [14]. This phenomenon might be because HBV DNA load reflected the level of virus replication and infectivity in patients with an HBV infection. There was a strong inflammatory response in HBV-infected women with a high HBV DNA load, leading to a higher risk of GDM. Furthermore, our study showed that an HBV infection during pregnancy increases the risk of ICP (1.1% vs. 0.2%, P < 0.05) and pre-eclampsia (3.4% vs. 2.5%, P < 0.05). These findings, which have rarely been investigated before, may have important clinical implications for pregnant women [30, 31].

Given that maternal HBsAg was associated with an increased risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes, our study suggests that women should receive a serological test for HBV infection before or early in the pregnancy. Thus, it is necessary to establish appropriate diagnosis and management for HBV-infected women. We recommend that HBV DNA load and the liver function of HBsAg-positive women be monitored regularly, which might help observe any change of condition. Antiviral treatment might be considered for women with a high HBV DNA load when necessary [32]. Moreover, the risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes in HBV-infected pregnant women should not be ignored. Screening and early interventions for GDM among high-risk populations such as those who are HBsAg positive (especially those with a high HBV DNA load), are older at maternal age, and are obese might contribute to the prevention or early diagnosis of GDM [33].

The strengths of the current study included a large sample size and comprehensive information on demographic characteristics, maternal and neonatal outcomes. However, our study was a single-center retrospective cohort study, which could not exclude selection and information bias. Additionally, we did not investigate the physiological mechanisms of the association between HBsAg and GDM.

Conclusion

Above all, our study found that being HBsAg positive, advanced age, and pre-pregnancy obesity were independent risk factors of GDM. High HBV DNA load (> 106 IU/mL) was associated with a higher risk for GDM among HBsAg-positive pregnant women. In addition, being positive for HBsAg during pregnancy increased the risk of ICP and pre-eclampsia.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

HBV:

Hepatitis B virus

HBsAg:

Hepatitis B surface antigen

GDM:

Gestational diabetes mellitus

ALT:

Alanine aminotransferase

OGTT:

Oral glucose tolerance test

BMI:

Body-mass index

ICP:

Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy

PROML:

Pre-labor rupture of membranes

PPH:

Postpartum hemorrhage

FGR:

Fetal growth restriction

NICU:

Neonatal intensive care unit

OR:

Odds ratios

CIs:

Confidence intervals

PCOS:

Polycystic ovary syndrome

References

  1. Kumar M, Singh T, Sinha S. Chronic hepatitis B virus infection and pregnancy. Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol. 2012;2(4):366–81.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Liu J, Zhang S, Wang Q, et al. Seroepidemiology of hepatitis B virus infection in 2 million men aged 21–49 years in rural China: a population-based, cross-sectional study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2016;16(1):80–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Cui F, Shen L, Li L, et al. Prevention of chronic hepatitis B after 3 decades of escalating vaccination policy, China. Emerg Infect Dis. 2017;23(5):765–72.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Collaborators PO. Global prevalence, treatment, and prevention of hepatitis B virus infection in 2016: a modelling study. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018;3(6):383–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cui F, Joseph W, Chan P, et al. Considerations of antiviral treatment to interrupt mother-to-child transmission of hepatitis B virus in China. Int J Epidemiol. 2018;47(5):1529–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Wang Y, Zhou H, Zhang L, et al. Prevalence of chronic hepatitis B and status of HBV care among rural women who planned to conceive in China. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):90–120.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Chen T, Wang J, et al. Different interventional criteria for chronic hepatitis B pregnant women with HBeAg(+) or HBeAg(−): epidemiological data from Shaanxi, China. Medicine. 2018;3(6):89–95.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lao TT, Chan BCP, Leung WC, et al. Maternal hepatitis B infection and gestational diabetes mellitus. J Hepatol. 2007;47(1):46–50.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Lao TT, Chung MK, Cheung TKW, et al. Antenatal hepatitis B and increased risk of gestational diabetes mellitus-Implications for obstetric care. J Infect. 2016;72(5):625–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Tan J, Liu X, Mao X, et al. HBsAg positivity during pregnancy and adverse maternal outcomes: a retrospective cohort analysis. J Viral Hepat. 2016;23(10):812–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Tan J, Mao X, Zhang G, et al. HBsAg positivity during pregnancy and risk of gestational diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Viral Hepat. 2018;11(25):1372–83.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Reddick KLB, Jhaveri R, Gandhi M, et al. Pregnancy outcomes associated with viral hepatitis. J Viral Hepat. 2011;18(7):e394–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Cui A, Cheng X, Shao J, et al. Maternal hepatitis B virus carrier status and pregnancy outcomes: a prospective cohort study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016;16:87.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Peng S, Wan Z, Lin X, et al. Maternal hepatitis B surface antigen carrier status increased the incidence of gestational diabetes mellitus. BMC Infect Dis. 2019;19(1):147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Correa A, Bardenheier B, Elixhauser A, et al. Trends in prevalence of diabetes among delivery hospitalizations, United States, 1993–2009. Matern Child Health J. 2015;19(3):635–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Bulletins-Obstetrics C. ACOG practice bulletin no. 190: gestational diabetes mellitus. Obstet Gynecol. 2018;131(2):e49–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Liu S, Pan Y, Auger N, et al. Small head circumference at birth: an 8-year retrospective cohort study in China. BMJ Paediatr Open. 2019;3(1):e470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Public Health Agency of Canada. Canadian perinatal health report, 2008 edition. Ottawa, 2008. http://www.phac-aspc.gc.ca/publicat/2008/cphr-rspc/pdf/cphr-rspc08-eng.pdf. Accessed 21 Jan 2019.

  19. Berger H, Gagnon R, Sermer M. Guideline no. 393-diabetes in pregnancy. J Obstetr Gynaecol Can. 2019;41(12):1814–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Abdi F, Novin M, Afrakhteh M, et al. Hepatitis B and pregnancy: an update review article. World J Obstetr Gynecol. 2015;4:1–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Liu J, Liang W, Jing W, et al. Countdown to 2030: eliminating hepatitis B disease, China. Bull World Health Organ. 2019;97(3):230–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Sirilert S, Traisrisilp K, Sirivatanapa P, et al. Pregnancy outcomes among chronic carriers of hepatitis B virus. Int J Gynecol Obstetr. 2014;126(2):106–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kong D, Liu H, Wei S, et al. A meta-analysis of the association between gestational diabetes mellitus and chronic hepatitis B infection during pregnancy. BMC Res Notes. 2014;7(1):139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. To WW, Cheung W, Mok KM. Hepatitis B surface antigen carrier status and its correlation to gestational hypertension. Aust N Z J Obstetr Gynaecol. 2015;43(2):119–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Gao C, Sun X, Lu L, et al. Prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus in mainland China: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Diabetes Investig. 2019;10(1):154–62.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Zhang C, Rawal S, Chong YS. Risk factors for gestational diabetes: is prevention possible? Diabetologia. 2016;59(7):1–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Elkrief L, Rautou P, Sarin S, et al. Diabetes mellitus in patients with cirrhosis: clinical implications and management. Liver Int. 2016;36(7):936–48.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Kinalski M, Kuźmicki M, Telejko B, et al. Tumor necrosis factor-alpha system in patients with gestational diabetes. Przegl Lek. 2006;63(4):173.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Jie X, Zhao YH, Chen YP, et al. Maternal circulating concentrations of tumor necrosis factor-alpha, leptin, and adiponectin in gestational diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci World J. 2014;2014:926–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Ding Y, Hu Y, Yu L. The impact of intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy with hepatitis B virus infection on perinatal outcomes. Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2014;10:381–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Ahmed MA, Sharif ME, Rayis DA, et al. Hepatitis B infection and pre-eclampsia among pregnant Sudanese women. Virol J. 2018;15(1):20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Brown R, Mcmahon B, Lok A, et al. Antiviral therapy in chronic hepatitis B viral infection during pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hepatology (Baltimore, MD). 2015;63(1):319–33.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Alfadhli EM. Gestational diabetes mellitus. Saudi Med J. 2015;36(4):399–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Editage (www.editage.cn) for English language editing.

Funding

The funding source for the research was the Guangzhou fundamental research project jointly funded by city and university (hospital) No. 202102010131.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Fang He and Dunjin Chen contributed equally to this work

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China

    Wanchang Yin, Bingjun Chen, Yilin Yang, Xiuzi Li, Ruirui Li, Guixian Chen, Fang He & Dunjin Chen

  2. Key Laboratory for Major Obstetric Diseases of Guangdong Province, Guangzhou, China

    Bingjun Chen, Jiangnan Xie, Fang He & Dunjin Chen

Authors
  1. Wanchang Yin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Bingjun Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yilin Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Xiuzi Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Ruirui Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Jiangnan Xie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Guixian Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Fang He
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Dunjin Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

WCY coordinated and carried out the study. BJC, YLY, XZL, RRL, JNX, GXC conducted the clinical work. WCY participated in the statistical analysis. FH and DJC reviewed and edited the manuscript. All the authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Fang He or Dunjin Chen.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study received ethical clearance from the Research Board at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.

Consent for publication

All participants provided informed consent.

Competing interests

The authors declared that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yin, W., Chen, B., Yang, Y. et al. Association between maternal hepatitis B virus carrier and gestational diabetes mellitus: a retrospective cohort analysis. Virol J 18, 226 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12985-021-01691-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12985-021-01691-0

Keywords

  • Hepatitis B surface antigen
  • Deoxyribonucleic acid load
  • Gestational diabetes mellitus

Virology Journal

ISSN: 1743-422X