Skip to main content

Differential mitochondrial proteomic analysis of A549 cells infected with avian influenza virus subtypes H5 and H9

Abstract

Background

Both the highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) H5N1 and low pathogenic avian influenza (LPAI) H9N2 viruses have been reported to cross species barriers to infect humans. H5N1 viruses can cause severe damage and are associated with a high mortality rate, but H9N2 viruses do not cause such outcomes. Our purpose was to use proteomics technology to study the differential expression of mitochondrial-related proteins related to H5N1 and H9N2 virus infections.

Methods

According to the determined viral infection titer, A549 cells were infected with 1 multiplicity of infection virus, and the mitochondria were extracted after 24 h of incubation. The protein from lysed mitochondria was analyzed by the BCA method to determine the protein concentration, as well as SDS-PAGE (preliminary analysis), two-dimensional gel electrophoresis, and mass spectrometry. Differential protein spots were selected, and Western blotting was performed to verify the proteomics results. The identified proteins were subjected to GO analysis for subcellular localization, KEGG analysis for functional classification and signaling pathways assessment, and STRING analysis for functional protein association network construction.

Results

In the 2-D gel electrophoresis analysis, 227 protein spots were detected in the H5N1-infected group, and 169 protein spots were detected in the H9N2-infected group. Protein spots were further subjected to mass spectrometry identification and removal of redundancy, and 32 differentially expressed proteins were identified. Compared with the H9N2 group, the H5N1-infected group had 16 upregulated mitochondrial proteins and 16 downregulated proteins. The differential expression of 70-kDa heat shock protein analogs, short-chain enoyl-CoA hydratase, malate dehydrogenase, and ATP synthase was verified by Western blot, and the results were consistent with the proteomics findings. Functional analysis indicated that these differentially expressed proteins were primarily involved in apoptosis and metabolism.

Conclusions

Compared with their expression in the H9N2 group, the differential expression of eight mitochondrial proteins in the H5N1 group led to host T cell activation, antigen presentation, stress response, ATP synthesis and cell apoptosis reduction, leading to higher pathogenicity of H5N1 than H9N2.

Background

H5N1, an influenza A virus (IAV), is a highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI)virus [1, 2]. It was first isolated and identified in domestic geese in Guangdong Province, China, in 1996. The spread of H5N1 avian influenza illness in poultry populations increases the risk of human infection [3]. In May 1997, the first human H5N1 virus infection occurred in the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of China: 18 people were infected and 6 died. As of 2019, H5N1 IAV had migrated to at least 17 countries, caused 861 confirmed infections and 455 deaths in humans [4]. To date, more than 850 cases of human infection with the H5N1 virus have been confirmed, with a mortality rate of approximately 60% [5]. H9N2, another IAV, is a low pathogenic avian influenza (LPAI) virus [6]. Individuals infected with LPAI H9N2 viruses generally have a mild upper respiratory tract illness, with only one death to date.

Influenza virus induces caspase-dependent apoptosis by activating caspase-3 [7]. Apoptosis is divided into the extrinsic and intrinsic pathways. The intrinsic apoptotic pathway engages caspases via members of the BCL-2 protein family and mitochondria in response to severe cellular damage or stress [8]. Mitochondria also play a leading role in the release of many important apoptosis-inducing molecules due to mitochondrial outer membrane permeabilization (MOMP) [9]. According to a whole-cell proteomic study of A549 cells infected with avian influenza virus H7N9 and influenza virus H1N1, some differentially expressed proteins are localized to mitochondria [10]. Influenza virus is a high-risk virus that poses a great threat to human health and the economy. According to their virulence level, IAVs are divided into LPAI and HPAI viruses. Most avian influenza viruses are LPAI viruses, which can produce subclinical infections in poultry or occasionally cause mild respiratory diseases, reduced egg production and low mortality rates [11]. HA subtype H5 and H7 LPAI viruses can mutate into HPAI variants. It is represented by H5N1 and H7N7, leading to severe progressive disease and high bird mortality [12]. HPAI viruses can seriously affect animal health and have an economic impact on the commercial poultry industry. In addition, some strains can be transmitted to humans [13].

We selected LPAI H9N2 virus-infected A549 cells as the control group and HPAI H5N1 virus-infected A549 cells as the test group in this study. Two-dimensional difference gel electrophoresis (2D) and MALDI-TOF tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) were applied to investigate the differences in the host proteome after infection with these two influenza virus strains and to explore the different pathogenic mechanisms of A/Chicken/Jiangsu/07/2002 (H9N2) and A/Chicken/Henan/12/2004 (H5N1) in infected human cells.

Methods and materials

Cell culture

A549 adenocarcinoma cells were purchased from the Cell Resource Center of the Shanghai Academy of Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences. A549 adenocarcinoma cells were cultured in F-12K Nutrient Mixture (GIBCO, Grand Island, NY, USA) at pH 7.2, supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (GIBCO) and penicillin (100 U/mL)/streptomycin (100 µg/mL) and grown in a cell culture incubator at 37 °C, under conditions of 5% CO2 and saturated humidity.

Virus infection and tissue culture infective Dose50 (TCID50)

A/Chicken/Jiangsu/07/2002 (H9N2) and A/Chicken/Henan/12/2004 (H5N1) were obtained from the Wuhan Institute of Virology, Chinese Academy of Sciences. A549 cells (80% confluent) were infected with H5N1 and H9N2 viruses at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 1 for 1 h, and viral growth medium (serum-free complete F-12K supplemented with 2 µg/mL of TPCK-treated trypsin) was added at 24 h.

The virus was diluted tenfold with a virus dilution solution (phosphate-buffered saline + 0.1%BSA) [14], and 100 μL of virus solution was added to the cells, followed by a 1-h incubation period in a cell culture incubator at 37 °C, with 5% CO2 and saturated humidity. After the virus and cells were incubated for 1 h, the virus–serum mixture was replaced with 5 mL of viral growth medium. After culture for 72 h [15], the median TCID (TCID50) was calculated by the method of Reed and Muench [16].

Extraction of mitochondrial proteins from virus-infected cells

Virus-infected cells were washed once with precooled PBS, and lysis buffer (25 mM mannitol, 0.5 mM EGTA, 5 mM HEPES, 0.1% BSA [w/v]) was added. The cells were scraped and placed in a homogenizer for homogenization. The cell sample was centrifuged at 600 × g for 5 min at 4 °C, and the supernatant was collected. The supernatant obtained by centrifugation in the previous step was centrifuged at 10,300 × g for 10 min at 4 °C, and the precipitate was mitochondrial protein [17]. The previous centrifugation step was repeated, and the precipitate was combined with that obtained in the previous step to further maximally enrich mitochondrial protein. The obtained mitochondrial protein was suspended in acetone precooled to − 20 °C, stored at − 20 °C for 12 h or more, and centrifuged at 8750 × g for 35 min at 4 °C. The supernatant was then removed, and the centrifugation step was repeated once. On an ultraclean work bench, samples were naturally air-dried on ice, and an appropriate amount of lysate was added to fully dissolve the precipitate. Protein was further dissolved by vortexing [18, 19].

The sample was collected and the protein concentration was determined using a bicinchoninic acid (BCA) protein assay kit (Sangon Biotech, Shanghai, China) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The samples were then aliquoted and stored at − 80 °C until subsequent use.

Two-dimensional (2-D) gel electrophoresis

Rehydration solution (8 M urea; 2 M thiourea; 4.0% [w/v] CHAPS; 20 mM Tris base; 20 mM DL-dithiothreitol; 0.5% [v/v] pH 3–10 amidine, and 10% [v/v] bromophenol blue) was added to the protein sample. For isolation of proteins by isoelectric focusing (IEF), a salt bridge was formed at the two poles of the electrophoresis tank, the supernatant of the centrifuged protein sample was added uniformly to the electrophoresis tank, and the isoelectric focusing strip (17 cm, pH 3–10) was removed from the − 20 °C freezer and equilibrated to room temperature. The sample was added to the electrophoresis channel, and the appropriate amount of mineral oil was added to cover the strip. The program was set as follows: 50 V for 14 h, passive rehydration; 500 V for 1 h, linear; 1000 V for 1 h, rapid; 5000 V for 1 h, rapid; 8000 V for 1 h, linear; and rapid ramping to 8000 V for 60,000 Vh [17]. After isoelectric focusing, strips were equilibrated in equilibration buffer (6 M urea, 20% glycerol, 2% SDS, 25 mM Tris–HCl [pH 8.8]) containing 0.2% (w/v) dithiothreitol for 15 min and then in the same buffer containing 3.0% (w/v) iodoacetamide and 0.175% (v/v) bromophenol blue for 15 min. Separation in the second direction was performed via 12.5% SDS-PAGE under a constant current of 25 mA, and gels were stained with Coomassie Brilliant Blue G-250. After decolorization, analysis was performed using ImageMaster software to match gel spots, and gray values that were significantly different (gray value ≥ 2.0-fold) between the H9N2-infected and H5N1-infected groups were selected for MS analysis.

In-gel trypsin digestion, MS and data searching

The sample was mixed in an equal ratio with 10 mg/mL α-cyano-4-hydroxcinnamic acid, directly spotted onto a spotting plate, and allowed to dry at room temperature. Peptide mass spectra were obtained with a 5800 MALDI TOF/TOF mass spectrometer (AB SCIEX, Foster City, USA). The MS/MS data of the peptide mass fingerprint (PMF) were submitted to the online software Mascot (Matrix Science, Boston, MA, USA) for identification according to the NCBIProt database. The parameters were as follows: taxonomy, Homo sapiens; enzyme, trypsin; allowed missed cleavages, two; variable modification, oxidation (M); fixed modification, carbamidomethylation (C); and number of peptide charges, + 1. The peptide and fragment mass tolerances were set at ± 1.2 Da and ± 0.6 Da, respectively. The data format was selected as Mascot generic, and the instrument was selected as MALDI-TOF-TOF. Proteins with a score greater than 30 were regarded as trustworthy proteins[17].

Western blot analysis

The extracted total cell lysate and mitochondrial proteins of H5N1 and H9N2 virus-infected A549 cells were quantified with a BCA kit (Sangon Biotech, Shanghai, China). Mitochondrial proteins (40 µg) and total cell lysate (40 µg) were separated by 12% SDS-PAGE and transferred to nitrocellulose membranes (BBI Life Sciences). After blocking with 5% (w/v) skim milk in TBST (50 mM Tris [pH 8.0], 150 mM NaCl, 0.1% [v/v] Tween-20) for 1 h at 37 °C, membranes were incubated separately overnight at 4 °C with rabbit monoclonal or polyclonal antibodies against ECHS1 (ab170108), MDH2 (ab181873) (Abcam), ATP5F1 (15999-1-ap), HSPA1L (13970-1-ap), BAX (50599-2-Ig), and Caspase 3 (66470-2-Ig) (Proteintech). After three washes with TBST, membranes were incubated with horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG or HRP-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG (used at a 1:5000 dilution, Proteintech) for 1 h at room temperature and were then washed three times with TBST. The immunoreactive protein bands were detected using enhanced chemiluminescence reagent (ECL; Advansta, CA, USA), with TOM40 (18409-1-ap) (Proteintech) and β-actin (66009-1-Ig) (Proteintech) as the loading controls.

Bioinformatics analysis

The Omicsbean online analysis software (http://www.omicsbean.cn) was used with the accession number of each identified protein to perform Gene Ontology (GO) classification and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) analysis for signaling pathways. The accession number of each identified protein was submitted for STRING (https://string-db.org) analysis for functional protein association network construction. Regular functional analysis was performed using the tools in the Swiss-Prot database (http://uniprot.org) [17, 20].

Statistical analysis

The statistical significance of differences between groups was determined by using a paired, nonparametric Student’s T-test. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. The experiment was repeated three times.

Results

2D Screening and identification of differentially expressed proteins

Mitochondrial protein extracts (1500 µg) from A549 cells infected with H5N1 or H9N2 influenza viruses were loaded onto 2-D gels. Two-dimensional gel electrophoresis showed 227 protein spots in the H5N1 group (Figure S1A) and 169 protein spots in the H9N2 group (Figure S1B). Eight differentially expressed protein spots from the mitochondria are also illustrated in an enlarged format (Figure S1C). After further MS identification and removal of redundancy, 32 differentially expressed proteins were identified. Compared with the H9N2-infected group, the H5N1-infected group had 16 upregulated mitochondrial proteins and 16 downregulated proteins (Tables 1, 2). Upregulated 70-kDa heat shock protein 1-like (HSPA1L) is located in the mitochondrial matrix, and short-chain enoyl-CoA hydratase (ECHS1) is located in the inner membrane of the mitochondria. Among these downregulated proteins, stress-70 protein, malate dehydrogenase (MDH2), mitochondrial membrane ATP synthase (ATP5F1), and stomatin-like 2 protein are located in the mitochondrial inner membrane, while peroxiredoxin 5 and 60-kDa heat shock protein (HSP60) are located in the mitochondrial matrix.

Table 1 Summary of downregulated proteins in A549 cells infected with influenza A H5N1 virus compared to H9N2-infected cells at 24 hpi (r > 2, p < 0.05)
Table 2 Summary of upregulated proteins in A549 cells infected with influenza A H5N1 virus compared to H9N2-infected cells at 24 hpi (r > 2, p < 0.05)

Gene ontology analysis of differentially expressed proteins

The proteins corresponding to the 32 differential protein spots were subjected to GO analysis. Only 26 of the 32 differentially expressed proteins were annotated through data analysis. The main biological processes involving these differentially expressed proteins are shown in Fig. 1a; specifically, 65.38% (17 proteins) were cellular components or involved in biogenesis, 61.53% (16 proteins) were involved in the positive regulation of biological processes, 50% (13 proteins) were associated with cell death, and 42.3% (11 proteins) were involved in programmed cell death. These findings indicate that the differences in the apoptotic process may be the cause of the differences in the host cells infected by different subtypes of influenza viruses. The cellular components are shown in Fig. 1b, with 65.38% (17 proteins) belonging to the organelle component. The molecular functions of the differentially expressed proteins are shown in Fig. 1c; 84.61% (22 proteins) were involved in binding, including protein binding, DNA binding and other molecular binding functions. These findings indicate that the binding proteins have an important role in host infection with different subtypes of influenza viruses.

Fig. 1
figure1

Differentially expressed protein GO annotation. a Biological Process. b Cellular Component. c Molecular Function

KEGG pathway analysis of differentially expressed proteins and construction of the protein interaction network diagram

KEGG analysis of signaling pathways involving the differentially expressed proteins was conducted. The differentially expressed proteins were involved in 37 signaling pathways, 9 of which were significantly different (P < 0.05) (Fig. 2). A total of 7.69% were involved in metabolic processes, 3.85% of which participated in carbohydrate metabolism, 3.85% in lipid metabolism, and 23.08% in genetic information processes. Of the 23.08%, 7.69% participated in the transcription process; 11.54% participated in protein folding, classification, and degradation processes; 7.69% were involved in antigen processing and presentation in the immune system; 7.69% were involved in virus infection; and 7.69% participated in parasitic infection. These findings indicate that the differential proteins involved in antigen processing and presentation of the immune system and viral infectious diseases have important roles in the differences between host cells infected with different subtypes of influenza virus.

Fig. 2
figure2

Analysis of differentially expressed proteins in KEGG signaling pathways

Protein–protein interaction analysis was performed on the differentially expressed proteins using STRING online software. From this analysis 24 of the 32 differentially expressed proteins were identified, and the results are shown in Fig. 3. The overall set of differentially expressed proteins is divided into three sections, and the albumin (ALB) protein connects these three sections. The ALB protein is involved in mitochondrial reactive oxygen species (ROS) production [21]. As a node of the regulatory network, it may play an important role in the virus infection process. Moreover, the proteins essentially interact with each other. The proteins ATP5FB, MDH2, ECHS1, and HSPA1L are located in the key site of the network and play crucial roles in the difference in virulence between H5N1 and H9N2.

Fig. 3
figure3

Protein–protein interaction (PPI) network diagrams at 24 h were a constructed by STRING software. Colored lines denote interactions. The black line represents coexpression, the purple line represents experiments, the cyan line represents databases, the green line represents text mining, and the blue line represents homology

Western blot of differentially expressed proteins

To validate the results of the proteomic studies, we performed Western blot analysis of the differentially expressed mitochondrial proteins ATP5F1, ECHS1, MDH2, and HSPA1L with the TOM40 protein as the control. The results are shown in Fig. 4; the density of the band corresponding to the mitochondrial protein MDH2 was significantly reduced in the H5N1-infected group compared with that in H9N2-infected group (P < 0.05). In addition, the densities of the ECHS1 and HSPA1L protein bands were significantly enhanced (P < 0.05, for both). The ATP5F1 band was weak, but the difference was nonsignificant. We performed the same Western blot experiment with total cell protein, and the results are shown in Fig. 5a. There were significant differences between ECHS1 and MDH2 in the total protein.

Fig. 4
figure4

Effects of H9N2 and H5N1 infection on ATP5F1, ECHS1, HSPA1L and MDH2 mitochondrial protein expression in A549 cells.*, p < 0.05 versus H9N2-infected group; n = 3

Fig. 5
figure5

Western blot analysis of total protein. a Effects of H9N2 and H5N1 infection on ATP5F1, ECHS1, HSPA1L and MDH2 total protein expression in A549 cells. b Western blot analysis of BAX and Caspase 3 protein levels in normal A549 cells and H5N1- and H9N2-infected A549 cells. β-actin was used as an internal reference. *, p < 0.05; n = 3

ECHS1 is associated with apoptosis; we speculate that the difference between hosts infected with different subtypes of influenza virus may be related to apoptosis. Western blotting was used to assess the total protein levels of BAX and Caspase 3 in A549 cells, with β-actin as the internal reference. The results are shown in Fig. 5b. The expression of BAX was increased in both the H5N1-infected group and the H9N2-infected group and was slightly higher in the H9N2-infected group than in the H5N1-infected group. Caspase 3 (32 kDa) expression was reduced in both the H5N1-infected and H9N2-infected groups, but the difference between the two groups was nonsignificant. Total protein Western blotting experiments showed that the differentially expressed proteins were mainly related to endogenous apoptosis.

Discussion

To date, many researchers have applied proteomics to study whole-cell proteomics during infection with influenza viruses such as H5N1, H3N2, and H1N1. However, we believe that compared with whole-cell proteomics, subcellular proteomics is more capable of identifying early diagnostic markers of influenza virus infection and is more conducive to the analysis of disease-related proteins and observation of the dynamic process of host cell infection with the virus. IAV can induce apoptosis [22], and the apoptotic pathway occurs in mitochondria [23]. To study the effect of infection with two different subtypes of influenza virus on the mitochondrial proteome, there is no need to set a blank control. We performed subcellular mitochondrial proteomic analysis of A549 cells infected with H5 and H9 subtype avian influenza viruses [24, 25]. To better study the process of viral infection of the host, we chose the 24 h time point to study the mitochondrial protein differences by two viruses with different pathogenicity [15].

Two-dimensional electrophoresis allows differential distribution of many protein isotypes. After data redundancy removal, we found that 16 proteins were upregulated and 16 were downregulated in the H5N1-infected group compared with those in the H9N2-infected group. However, further validation of the subcellular localization of some proteins is needed. Among the identified mitochondrial proteins, 6 mitochondrial proteins were downregulated and 2 mitochondrial proteins were upregulated in the H5N1-infected group compared with those in the H9N2-infected group.

Based on GO analysis, most differentially expressed proteins were binding proteins. A variety of binding proteins that affect the virulence of influenza viruses have been discovered, such as poly (rC)-binding protein 2 and nuclear export protein 1 [26, 27]. We found that these differentially expressed binding proteins may be related to the mechanism of influenza virus infection. Therefore, our findings are helpful for further analysis of the mechanism that binds proteins to influenza viruses.

Among the upregulated mitochondrial proteins was the molecular chaperone HSPA1L, a member of the 70-kDa heat shock protein (HSP70) family that is localized to the mitochondrial matrix and whose coding gene is located on chromosome 6p21 in the HLA class III region [28]. Other studies have shown that HSP70 appears to be upregulated during infection with HPAI virus compared to during infection with LPAI virus This chaperone is involved in a variety of cellular processes, including folding and transport of newly synthesized polypeptides, proteolytic activation of misfolded proteins, and formation and dissociation of protein complexes [29]. The ECHS1 protein is found in mitochondria, peroxisomes, and smooth endoplasmic reticulum. The upregulated protein enoyl-CoA hydratase, encoded by ECHS1 on chromosome 10, is a 160-kDa hexamer enzyme consisting of 290 amino acids and is located in the mitochondrial matrix. ECHS1 is associated with mitochondrial short-chain and medium-chain fatty acid β-oxidation and branched-chain amino acid catabolic pathways, as well as other catabolic pathways [30]. In the absence of hepatitis B virus infection, the ECHS1 gene was subjected to RNA interference and was found to promote apoptosis after transfection into HepG2 cells [31]. However, in Xiao et al.’s study in hepatitis B virus-infected HepG2 cells, ECHS1, a binding protein of hepatitis B virus surface antigen, promoted HepG2 cell apoptosis. The coexistence of ECHS1 and hepatitis B virus surface antigen changed the expression of Bcl-2 family proteins; specifically, 12 proapoptotic proteins were upregulated, and 8 antiapoptotic proteins were downregulated [32]. The results of this study are consistent with those obtained after RNA interference in the absence of hepatitis B virus infection, indicating that not all viruses can use ECHS1 as a binding protein for viral surface antigens, thereby promoting apoptosis. Related studies have confirmed that influenza virus can induce apoptosis. In our study, the difference in BAX expression detected by Western blotting showed that the level of endogenous apoptosis induced by HPAIV was higher than that induced by LPAIV. Endogenous apoptosis leads to mitochondrial swelling, disappearance of internal cristae and permeabilization, a possible reason for the difference in the virulence of these two viruses. In addition, downregulation of ECHS1 protein expression affects the fatty acid β oxidation pathway and reduces the replication ability of RNA viruses such as measles virus, vesicular stomatitis virus, and Semliki Forest virus [33]. Our results revealed that the expression of ECHS1 protein was upregulated in the H5N1 virus-infected group compared with that in H9N2 virus-infected group, which may explain why the H5N1 virus is more pathogenic than the H9N2 virus.

Among these downregulated mitochondrial proteins, the heat shock 70-kDa protein 1-like, malate dehydrogenase, mitochondrial membrane ATP synthase, and stomatin-like 2 proteins are located in the mitochondrial inner membrane, while the peroxiredoxin 5 and 60-kDa heat shock proteins are located in the mitochondrial matrix. HSPA1L indirectly affects body metabolism and biological function by regulating iron-sulfur protein maturation [34]; malate dehydrogenase is associated with the TCA cycle [4]; ATP synthase is involved in energy production and permeability transition pores (PTP, key players in cell death); stomatin-like protein 2 is involved in T cell activation, calcium homeostasis, and the stress response [35]; peroxiredoxin-5 plays an antioxidative stress role in cell protection [36, 37]; and 60-kDa heat shock protein is involved in controlling protein folding, the stress response, and the delivery of endogenous peptides to antigen presenting cells [38].

These eight differentially expressed mitochondrial proteins, especially ECHS1, may be used as new antiviral targets, but the results need to be further verified by a series of methods, such as RNA interference. In IAV proteomic studies by other groups, 60-kDa heat shock protein, 70-kDa heat shock protein and ATP synthase subunits often appear as differentially expressed proteins. Are these differentially expressed proteins commonly regulated by different IAVs? To date, a relatively small amount of proteomic data have been obtained for different IAVs. Thus, a large amount of proteomics data for different IAV infections is needed to analyze the common differentially expressed proteins for different IAV infections and the pathogenic mechanism of IAV.

We hypothesized that H5N1 is highly pathogenic compared with H9N2, probably because of the upregulation and downregulation of the above eight mitochondrial proteins, which in turn inhibit T cell activation, antigen presentation, stress responses, and other processes. The increased mortality from H5N1 infection may also be due to metabolic abnormalities. A total of 42.3% of these differentially expressed proteins were involved in the apoptotic process, and we speculate that the altered levels of mitochondrial protein expression during IAV pathogenesis are due mainly to the difference in the endogenous apoptotic process. Our analysis also identified many other influencing factors, indicating that host cell infection is a complex process.

Conclusions

In this study, we infected A549 cells with H5N1 and H9N2 AIVs, then extracted the mitochondrial proteins of the infected cells for differential protein analysis. Through analysis of the functions of the differential proteins, it was found that compared with that in the H9N2 group, T cell activation in the H5N1 group was reduced and antigen presentation was weakened. Based on GO analysis, most of these differential proteins were related to apoptosis. To a certain extent, the pathogenicity of different IAVs is related to their ability to cause apoptosis. In our research, we identified different proteins, such as Stress-70 protein, peroxide reductase-5, enoyl-CoA hydratase, Stomatin-like protein 2, ATP synthase, and 60-kDa heat shock protein. These identified proteins play an important role in apoptosis. This study aids the analysis of the pathogenic mechanism of influenza viruses with different virulence, and provides a reference for the selection of anti-influenza virus host targets.

Availability of data and materials

The mass spectrometry proteomics data have been deposited to the ProteomeXchange Consortium (http://proteomecentral.proteomexchange.org) via the iProX partner repository, dataset identifier PXD017921.

Abbreviations

AIV:

Avian influenza virus

HPAI:

Highly pathogenic avian influenza

LPAI:

Low pathogenic avian influenza

2D:

Two-dimensional difference gel electrophoresis

MALDI-TOF:

Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time of flight

GO:

Gene ontology

KEGG:

Kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes

FBS:

Fetal bovine serum

BSA:

Bovine serum albumin

EGTA:

Ethylene glycol bis(2-aminoethyl)tetraacetic acid

HEPES:

4-(2-Hydroxyethyl)piperazine-1-ethanesulfonic acid

NCBI:

National center for biotechnology information

MOI:

Multiplicity of infection

PBS:

Phosphate-buffered saline

SD:

Standard deviation

References

  1. 1.

    Criado M, Sá E, Silva M, Lee D, de Lima Salge C, Spackman E, Donis R, Wan X, Swayne D. Cross-protection by inactivated H5 pre-pandemic vaccine seed strains against diverse Goose/Guangdong lineage H5N1 highly pathogenic avian influenza viruses. J Virol. 2020;94(24):e00720–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Erfan A, Selim A, Helmy S, Eriksson P, Naguib M. Chicken anaemia virus enhances and prolongs subsequent avian influenza (H9N2) and infectious bronchitis viral infections. Vet Microbiol. 2019;230:123–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Duan L, Bahl J, Smith GJD, Wang J, Vijaykrishna D, Zhang LJ, Zhang JX, Li KS, Fan XH, Cheung CL. The development and genetic diversity of H5N1 influenza virus in China, 1996–2006. Virology. 2008;380:243–54.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Kombiah S, Kumar M, Murugkar H, Nagarajan S, Tosh C, Senthil Kumar D, Rajukumar K, Gautam S, Singh R, Karikalan M, et al. Experimental pathology of two highly pathogenic H5N1 viruses isolated from crows in BALB/c mice. Microbial Pathogenesis. 2020;141:103984.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Eggink D, Spronken M, van der Woude R, Buzink J, Broszeit F, McBride R, Pawestri H, Setiawaty V, Paulson J, Boons G, et al. Phenotypic effects of substitutions within the receptor binding site of highly pathogenic avian influenza H5N1 virus observed during human infection. J Virol. 2020;94(13):e00195-20.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Sun Y, Liu J. H9N2 influenza virus in China: a cause of concern. Protein Cell. 2015;6:18–25.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Qu X, Ding X, Duan M, Yang J, Lin R, Zhou Z, Wang S. Influenza virus infection induces translocation of apoptosis-inducing factor (AIF) in A549 cells: role of AIF in apoptosis and viral propagation. Arch Virol. 2017;162:1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Ashkenazi Avi. Targeting the extrinsic apoptotic pathway in cancer: lessons learned and future directions. J Clin Invest. 2015;125:487–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Tait S, Green D. Mitochondria and cell death: outer membrane permeabilization and beyond Nature reviews. Mol Cell Biol. 2010;11:621–32.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Ding X, Lu J, Yu R, Wang X, Wang T, Dong F, Peng B, Wu W, Liu H, Geng Y, et al. Preliminary proteomic analysis of A549 cells infected with avian influenza virus H7N9 and influenza A virus H1N1. PloS ONE. 2016;11:e0156017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Gonzales JL, Elbers ARW. Effective thresholds for reporting suspicions and improve early detection of avian influenza outbreaks in layer chickens. Sci Reports. 2018;8(1):8533.

    Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Webster RG, Rott R. Influenza virus A pathogenicity: the pivotal role of hemagglutinin. Cell. 1987;50:665–6.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Capua I, Munoz O. Emergence of influenza viruses with zoonotic potential: Open issues which need to be addressed A review. Vet Microbiol. 2013;165:7–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Peng B, Peng N, Zhang Y, Zhang F, Li X, Chang H, Fang F, Wang F, Lu F, Chen Z. Comparison of the protective efficacy of neutralizing epitopes of 2009 pandemic H1N1 influenza hemagglutinin. Frontiers Immunol. 2017;8:1070.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Wu X, Wang H, Bai L, Yu Y, Sun Z, Yan Y, Zhou J. Mitochondrial proteomic analysis of human host cells infected with H3N2 swine influenza virus. J Proteom. 2013;91:136–50.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Biacchesi S, Skiadopoulos MH, Yang L, Murphy BR, Collins PL, Buchholz UJ. Rapid human metapneumovirus microneutralization assay based on green fluorescent protein expression. J Virol Methods. 2005;128:192–7.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Wang M, Chen Y, Guo Z, Yang C, Qi J, Fu Y, Chen Z, Chen P, Wang Y. Changes in the mitochondrial proteome in human hepatocytes in response to alpha-amanitin hepatotoxicity. Toxicon. 2018;156:34–40.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Cao R, He QY, Zhou J, He QZ, Liu Z, Wang XC, Chen P, Xie J, Liang SP. High-throughput analysis of rat liver plasma membrane proteome by a nonelectrophoretic in-gel tryptic digestion coupled with mass spectrometry identification. J Proteome Res. 2008;7:535–45.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Huang L, Li B, Luo C, Xie J, Liang S. Proteome comparative analysis of gynogenetic haploid and diploid embryos of goldfish (Carassius auratus). Proteomics. 2010;4:235–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Xun C, Ge L, Tang F, Wang L, Zhuo Y, Long L, Qi J, Hu L, Duan D, Chen P, et al. Insight into the proteomic profiling of exosomes secreted by human OM-MSCs reveals a new potential therapy. Biomed Pharmacother. 2020;131:110584.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Tretter L, Mayer-Takacs D, Adam-Vizi V. The effect of bovine serum albumin on the membrane potential and reactive oxygen species generation in succinate-supported isolated brain mitochondria. Neurochem Int. 2007;50:139–47.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Liu B, Meng D, Wei T, Zhang S, Hu Y, Wang M. Apoptosis and pro-inflammatory cytokine response of mast cells induced by influenza A viruses. PloS ONE. 2014;9:e100109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Hata A, Engelman J, Faber A. The BCL2 Family: Key Mediators of the Apoptotic Response to Targeted Anticancer Therapeutics. Cancer Discov. 2015;5:475–87.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Liu N, Song W, Wang P, Lee K, Chan W, Chen H, Cai Z. Proteomics analysis of differential expression of cellular proteins in response to avian H9N2 virus infection in human cells. Proteomics. 2008;8:1851–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Liu C, Zhang A, Guo J, Yang J, Zhou H, Chen H, Jin M. Identification of human host proteins contributing to H5N1 influenza virus propagation by membrane proteomics. J Proteome Res. 2012;11:5396–405.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Chutiwitoonchai N, Yoko A. NXT1, a novel influenza A NP binding protein, promotes the nuclear export of NP via a CRM1-dependent pathway. Viruses. 2016;8(8):209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Li X, Fu Z, Liang H, Wang Y, Qi X, Ding M, Sun X, Zhou Z, Huang Y, Gu H, et al. H5N1 influenza virus-specific miRNA-like small RNA increases cytokine production and mouse mortality via targeting poly(rC)-binding protein 2. Cell Res. 2018;28:157–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Takahashi S, Andreoletti G, Chen R, Munehira Y, Batra A, Afzal N, Beattie R, Bernstein J, Ennis S, Snyder M. De novo and rare mutations in the HSPA1L heat shock gene associated with inflammatory bowel disease. Genome Med. 2017;9:8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Srivastava S, Vishwanathan V, Birje A, Sinha D, D’Silva P. Evolving paradigms on the interplay of mitochondrial Hsp70 chaperone system in cell survival and senescence. Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol. 2019;54:517–36.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Bedoyan J, Yang S, Ferdinandusse S, Jack R, Miron A, Grahame G, DeBrosse S, Hoppel C, Kerr D, Wanders R. Lethal neonatal case and review of primary short-chain enoyl-CoA hydratase (SCEH) deficiency associated with secondary lymphocyte pyruvate dehydrogenase complex (PDC) deficiency. Mol Genet Metab. 2017;120:342–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Zhu X, Dai Y, Chen Z, Xie J, Zeng W, Lin Y, Tan Q. Knockdown of ECHS1 protein expression inhibits hepatocellular carcinoma cell proliferation via suppression of Akt activity. Crit Rev Eukaryot Gene Exp. 2013;23:275–82.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Xiao C, Yang X, Huang Q, Zhang Y, Lin B, Liu J, Liu Y, Jazag A, Guleng B, Ren J. ECHS1 acts as a novel HBsAg-binding protein enhancing apoptosis through the mitochondrial pathway in HepG2 cells. Cancer Lett. 2013;330:67–73.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Takahashi M, Watari E, Shinya E, Shimizu T, Takahashi H. Suppression of virus replication via down-modulation of mitochondrial short chain enoyl-CoA hydratase in human glioblastoma cells. Antivir Res. 2007;75:152–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Stehling O, Paul V, Bergmann J, Basu S, Lill R. Biochemical analyses of human iron-sulfur protein biogenesis and of related diseases. Methods Enzymol. 2018;599:227–63.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Giorgio V, Burchell V, Schiavone M, Bassot C, Minervini G, Petronilli V, Argenton F, Forte M, Tosatto S, Lippe G, et al. Ca binding to F-ATP synthase β subunit triggers the mitochondrial permeability transition. EMBO Rep. 2017;18:1065–76.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Rhee S, Kil I. Multiple functions and regulation of mammalian peroxiredoxins. Ann Rev Biochem. 2017;86:749–75.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Tu D, Jiang M, Gu W, Zhou Y, Zhu Q, Zhou Z, Chen Y, Shu M. Identification and characterization of atypical 2-cysteine peroxiredoxins from mud crab Scylla paramamosain: The first evidence of two peroxiredoxin 5 genes in non-primate species and their involvement in immune defense against pathogen infection. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2017;69:119–27.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Arcaro A, Daga M, Cetrangolo G, Ciamporcero E, Lepore A, Pizzimenti S, Petrella C, Graf M, Uchida K, Mamone G, et al. Generation of adducts of 4-Hydroxy-2-nonenal with heat shock 60 kDa protein 1 in human promyelocytic HL-60 and monocytic THP-1 cell lines. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2015. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/296146.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr. Jian-Jun Chen from Wuhan Institute of Virology for kindly providing the A/Chicken/Jiangsu/07/2002(H9N2), A/Chicken/Henan/12/2004(H5N1) and for use of the BSL-3 facilities.

Funding

This work was supported by the Hunan Provincial Education Department (18C0074); National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grants 31670838).

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

YY, YW, ZC and CH designed experiments; YY, ZY, YC carried out experiments; FF and CP analyzed experimental results; and YY wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Haiyan Chang, Ze Chen or Ping Chen.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The ethics committee of Hunan Normal University Biomedical Research approved the cell experiment presented in this paper (Approval Number: 2020-193).

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

All the authors have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1.

Figure S1: 2-DE gel images of H9N2-infected and H5N1 groups of A549 cells at 24 hpi. a 2-DE gel of the H5N1-infected group. b 2-DE gel of the H9N2-infected group. The distribution of differential protein spots identified by mass spectrometry in the two-dimensional electrophoresis pattern. The downward arrow indicates that H5N1 expressed down-regulated protein spots compared to the low-toxic control; the upward arrow indicates that H5N1 expressed up-regulated protein spots compared to the low-toxic control. c Enlarged regions of several differentially expressed protein spots. Differentially expressed protein spots are indicated by numbers and circles.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yang, Y., Zhang, Y., Yang, C. et al. Differential mitochondrial proteomic analysis of A549 cells infected with avian influenza virus subtypes H5 and H9. Virol J 18, 39 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12985-021-01512-4

Download citation

Keywords

  • Influenza virus
  • Mitochondria
  • Two-dimensional electrophoresis
  • Proteomics