Open Access

Negative immune factors might predominate local tumor immune status and promote carcinogenesis in cervical carcinoma

  • Minyi Zhao1,
  • Yang Li2,
  • Xing Wei2,
  • Qian Zhang2,
  • Hongran Jia2,
  • Shimin Quan2,
  • Di Cao2,
  • Li Wang2,
  • Ting Yang2,
  • Juan Zhao2,
  • Meili Pei2,
  • Sijuan Tian2,
  • Yang Yu2,
  • Yanping Guo2 and
  • Xiaofeng Yang1Email author
Virology Journal201714:5

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12985-016-0670-8

Received: 10 July 2016

Accepted: 9 December 2016

Published: 13 January 2017

Abstract

Background

The disequilibrium of local immune microenvironment is an essential element during tumorigenesis.

Method

By conducting real-time polymerase chain reaction, we identified the mRNA level of immune factors, FoxP3 (forkhead box protein P3), CCL22/CCR4 (chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 22/CC chemokine receptor 4), OX40L/OX40 (tumor necrosis factor superfamily member 4/tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily member 4) and Smad3 (SMAD family member 3) in neoplastic foci and its periphery tissues from 30 cases of squamous cervical carcinoma and 20 cases of normal cervix.

Result

The FoxP3, CCL22 and CCR4 mRNA level in local immune microenvironment of normal cervix was lower than that in cervical cancer. While OX40L, OX40 and Smad3 mRNA level profile in normal cervix was higher than that in cervical cancer. Beyond individual effect, the pairwise positive correlations were demonstrated among the mRNA level of FoxP3, CCL22 and CCR4. The mRNA level of OX40 negatively correlated with CCL22, but positively correlated with Smad3. Moreover, the mRNA level of FoxP3 and CCL22 was increased while Smad3 was decreased in cervical tissue with HPV (human papilloma virus) infection.

Conclusion

Our data yields insight into the roles of these immune factors in cervical carcinogenesis. It may therefore be that, in microenvironment of cervical squamous cell carcinoma, along with the context of HPV infection, negative immune regulators FoxP3, CCL22 and CCR4 might overwhelm positive immune factors OX40L, OX40 and Smad3, giving rise to an immunosuppressive status and promote the progression of cervical carcinogenesis.

Trial registration

Not applicable.

Keywords

Cervical cancer Immune microenvironment Immune factors

Background

Cervical cancer is the fourth most common female malignant disease globally, posing a serious threat to women’s health. The latest data released by WHO showed that there were 528,000 new cases and 266,000 deaths all over the world in 2012. Roughly 62,000 new cases were reported in China along with 30,000 deaths [1]. Worse still, cervical cancer is becoming more and more prevalent among young Chinese women [2]. Epidemiological evidence has confirmed that HR-HPV (high-risk human papilloma virus) is the trigger of cervical cancer. Normally, HPV infection is frequent among women and about 90% can be spontaneously cleared [35]. While 10% persists, which is crucial to malignant progression. Studies have illustrated that HPV exploits kinds of mechanisms to hide from being inactivated, such as restraining the activity of NK (natural killer cells) [68] and LCs (langerhans cells) [9]. Tumor immune microenvironment is a complex milieu maintaining a delicate balance between inflammation and tolerance [10]. Once broken, host cells infected by HR-HPV can’t be eliminated effectively, allowing for tumorigenesis, tumor progression and metastasis.

FoxP3 + Treg has been identified as a notorious immunosuppressive cell in local site. FoxP3 is regarded as a critical marker to the development and negative immune effect of FoxP3 + Tregs. CCL22 is one of CC chemokines produced by macrophages, dendric cells and tumor cells. CCR4, confirmed as its specific receptor, is mainly expressed in different T cell subsets, including Th2 (helper T cell) and regulatory T cells. The CCL22-CCR4 axis could induce the expression of FoxP3 in Tregs [11] and infiltrate FoxP3 + Treg selectively into tumor sites, contributing to form an immunocompromised environment in favor of tumor growth. OX40 is highly expressed on effector T cells and Tregs. Its ligand named OX40L, is mostly localized on activated APC (antigen presenting cell). Plenty of evidences have demonstrated that OX40L-OX40 axis is of great importance to impede the suppressive function of Treg by inhibiting TGF-β-driven (transforming growth factor-β) conversion of naive CD4+ FOXP3 T cells into CD4+FOXP3+ T cells [12]. Smad3 is a pivotal intracellular mediator for participating in the activation of multiple immune signal pathway. TNF-α (tumor necrosis factor-α) impairs the differentiation and function of TGF-β-induced FoxP3 + Tregs by inhibiting the phosphorylation of Smad3. Moreover, studies from Smad−/− mice have testified that the loss of Smad3 induced IgG2a expression, leading to an obvious enhanced Th2 reaction and Th1/Th2 shift [13]. Low expression of Smad3 has been found in acute T-cell lymphoblastic leukemia [14] and gastric carcinoma [15].

Hitherto, the expression profile of these immune factors in the immune microenvironment of cervical cancer has not yet been identified. We therefore examined their expression in cervical tissues with the aim of delineating their individual and underlying combined effects in modulating the local immune state and tumorigenesis.

Methods

Tissues samples from 30 patients with cervical squamous cell carcinoma and 20 patients with hysteromyoma treated in the department of gynecology of The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University were recruited from 2014 to 2015, with an median age of 43.6 (range 27–62) years. All the cancer cases were diagnosed without lymphovascular invasion or lymphatic metastasis, including 22 cases of low grade squamous cell carcinoma and 8 cases of high grade squamous cell carcinoma, with 27 HPV-positive cases and 3 HPV-negative cases. The control group comprised 6 HPV-positive cases and 14 HPV-negative cases.

Sample collection

After the uterus was removed in the surgery, we collected about 2x1x1cm3 normal cervix or neoplastic foci and pericarcinous tissues of the same size on or beside the cervical lesions macroscopically and rinsed the blood out of the specimen with PBS buffer in sterile condition immediately. These specimens were preserved in liquid nitrogen or −80 °C refrigerator.

Real-time PCR

Total RNA was extracted and purified from tissue specimen using TRIzol Reagent (15596-026, life, USA). The RNA concentration was determined by spectrophotometric assay.4 ug of total RNA with 0.4uM of specific primer was then subjected into cDNA using PrimeScriptTM RT Master Mix (RR037A, TaKaRa Japan), followed by real-time PCR using SYBR Prime Ex TaqTMII (RR820A, TaKaRa Japan) according to the manufacturer’s instruction (C1000 Thermal Cycler, BIO-RAD, USA). The primers used were as follows (Table 1). The expression level of targeted genes was calculated using internal control GAPDH mRNA and the 2-Ct methods.
Table 1

The primers for each immune factors and house-keeping gene

Gene

Primer sequence

Product of amplication (bp)

FoxP3-F

TTTGCTGATTGTTGCTTTGC

 

FoxP3-R

GTTCAACTGATGCTGCCTGA

158

CCL22-F

GGTATTTGAACCTGTGGAATTGGAG

 

CCL22-R

CAGGCCCTGGATGACACTGA

163

CCR4-F

CCCTTAGGGATCATGCTGTT

 

CCR4-R

TCAAAGGTGCAGTCCTGAAG

197

OX40-F

CAAGCCTGGAGTTGACTGTG

 

OX40-R

GATTGCGTCCGAGCTATTG

139

Smad3-F

AGACCTCATGCCCAGCTCTC

 

Smad3-R

GGGGAGGGAGACAGACAAAAC

165

OX40L-F

TCCCAGCCTCCAAACATAGT

 

OX40L-R

GTGTTGCTTTGCCTGTCTGT

359

GAPDH-F

GCACCGTCAAGGCTGAGAAC

 

GAPDH-R

TGGTGAAGACGCCAGTGGA

138

Statistical analysis

All data was processed by SPSS 20.0 statistical software. Mann-Whitney U rank sum test and Spearman rank correlation analysis were chosen for data managing. A P value of less than 0.05 was considered to indicate statistical significance.

Results

  1. 1.

    Negative immune regulators, FoxP3, CCL22 and CCR4, prevailed in cervical cancer immune microenvironment.

    To ascertain FoxP3, CCL22 and CCR4 mRNA level in cervical carcinoma, we quantified their expression in 30 cases of neoplastic foci with adjacent tissue and 20 healthy control. The results exhibited the mRNA level of FoxP3, CCL22 and CCR4 of local microenvironment in cervical cancer was significantly higher than that in normal cervix. Besides, we also compared their mRNA level in different pathological grade . In contrast to low grade squamous cell carcinoma, their mRNA level increased moderately in high grade lesion (Fig. 1).
    Fig. 1

    FoxP3, CCL22 and CCR4 mRNA relative level in cervical tissues. Figure a shows significantly higher level of FoxP3, CCL22 and CCR4 mRNA in neoplastic foci and (or) periphery tissues than that in normal cervix. Figure b shows higher level of FoxP3, CCL22 and CCR4 mRNA in neoplastic foci of high grade squamous cell carcinoma than that in low grade lesion. Figure c reveals higher level of FoxP3, CCL22 and CCR4 mRNA in pericarcinous tissues of high grade squamous cell carcinoma than that in low grade lesion. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01

     
  2. 2.

    Positive immune factors, OX40L, OX40 and Smad3, crippled in cervical cancer immune microenvironment.

    The positive immune enhancers, OX40L, OX40 and Smad3 mRNA level of local microenvironment in cervical cancer was significantly lower than that in normal cervix. In comparison to low grade squamous cell carcinoma, their mRNA level decreased moderately in high grade lesion (Fig. 2).
    Fig. 2

    OX40L/OX40 and Smad3 mRNA relative level in cervical tissues. Figure a shows significantly higher level of OX40L/OX40 and Smad3 mRNA in normal cervix than that in neoplastic foci and (or) periphery tissues. Figure b shows lower level of OX40L/OX40 and Smad3 mRNA in neoplastic foci of high grade squamous cell carcinoma than that in low grade lesion. Figure c reveals lower level of OX40L/OX40 and Smad3 mRNA in pericarcinous tissues of high grade squamous cell carcinoma than that in low grade lesion. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01

     
  3. 3.

    The synergism of congeneric immune factors and antagonism of alien regulators might worsen the immune imbalance in cervical cancer microenvironment.

    To discover whether mutual effect existed in local site among these factors, correlation analysis was conducted of their mRNA level. The results showed that the mRNA level of CCL22 was positively correlated with FoxP3 in neoplastic foci and adjacent tissues (r = 0.353, r = 0.307, P < 0.05) . Parallel outcome was observed between the mRNA level of FoxP3 and CCR4 (r = 0.607, r = 0.205, P < 0.05), CCL22 and CCR4 (r = 0.786, r = 0.344, P < 0.05), as well as OX40 and Smad3 (r = 0.384, r = 0.288, P < 0.05). The correlation analysis indicated that in immune microenvironment of cervical cancer, the mRNA level of CCL22 and CCR4 was strengthened as the Foxp3 mRNA level increased and vice verse. The pairwise correlation prompted that inhibitory regulators, FoxP3, CCL22 and CCR4 may magnify each other’s negative function through inducing mutual expression of mRNA, then synergistically promote local immunosuppression. As the mRNA level of OX40 and Smad3 was decreased in neoplastic foci and pericarcinous tissues, the potential congenerous effect of OX40 and Smad3 might be weakened in local microenvironment of cervical cancer. Conversely, the mRNA level of CCL22 seemed to be inversely related to OX40 (r = −0.288, r = −0.263, P < 0.05), which hinted us that there still underlies counteraction between CCL22 and OX40 to accentuate immune inhibition. While no correlations were found between other factors

     
  4. 4.

    Immune repressors, FoxP3 and CCL22, were vibrant while promoter Smad3 was sluggish in HPV-positive local cervical microenvironment.

    To assess the association between HPV infection and immune factors mRNA level, the total 50 samples were divided into HPV-positive and HPV-negative group and comparison was performed. The results displayed higher level of mRNA of FoxP3 and CCL22 in HPV-positive cancerous and adjacent tissues comparing to HPV-negative corresponding tissues. While lower level of Smad3 mRNA was observed in HPV-positive cancerous tissues than that in HPV-negative cases. All these outcomes indicated that in the backdrop of HPV infection, the immunosuppressive impact of immune repressors might be aggravated while immunological acceleration of enhancer be passivated which tilted the immune status to the tolerance condition. The mRNA level of CCR4, OX40L and OX40 were invariable in cervical tissues regardless of different HPV infection status (Fig. 3).
    Fig. 3

    The mRNA level of immune factors in different HPV infection status. FoxP3 and CCL22 mRNA level was up-regulated, while Smad3 mRNA level was down-regulated in HPV-positive cases compared to the HPV-negative corresponding group. *P < 0.05

     

Discussion

  1. 1.

    Negative immune factors might play an dominant role in suppressing local tumor immune status and promoting carcinogenesis in HPV triggered cervical cancer.

    As a momentous immunosuppressive cell, FoxP3 + Tregs is suspected of reducing T cell activity [16] and secreting repressive cytokines, such as interleukin-10 [17] and interleukin-35. Intriguingly, although more and more data had provided first evidence for FoxP3 expression localized also in cancer cells, our preliminary trial has showed that the positive expression of FoxP3 was only observed in the nucleus of regulatory T cells rather than in cervical carcinoma cell lines or cervical cancer cells by immunohistochemical staining.

    In comparison to normal cervix, the mRNA level of these negative factors exhibited a remarkable increase in microenvironment of cervical cancer. Moreover, these factors expressed significantly more in high grade squamous carcinoma cell than in low grade lesion. Our data presented here implied that FoxP3 and CCL22/CCR4 played an vital part in down-regulating immune response of tumor microenvironment and boosting the cervical cancer carcinogenesis. Meanwhile, the less differentiated the cervical cancer cell was, the higher the mRNA level of FoxP3, CCL22 and CCR4 would be in microenvironment of cervical cancer, exacerbating the disequilibrium of local immunity and tumor growth. It was in coincidence with our prophase study which showed that the number of FoxP3 + Tregs was lowest in normal cervix and highest in invasive neoplasia and compared to high grade squamous cell carcinoma, it diminished in low grade lesions. Kim et al. [18] observed that the distribution frequency of FoxP3 + Treg was extremely high in colorectal, pancreatic, hepatocelluar and ovarian carcinoma [1921] and Kumai et al. noticed high expression of CCL22 and CCR4 in nasal NK/T cells lymphoma, lung and breast cancer [2224].

    As mentioned above, HPV infection is the key causative element of cervical carcinogenesis. Several studies have found that the expression product of HPV can convert local cytokines profiles in cervical lesion called Th1/Th2 shift by decreasing the levels of Th1 cytokines and increasing the Th2 cytokines [25]. In our research, we noticed higher level of FoxP3mRNA and CCL22mRNA in cancerous and adjacent tissues with HPV infection, which reminded us that in the context of HPV infection, immune regulators that favor negative effect could be accumulated in local situs to incline the immune status towards suppressive side.

     
  2. 2.

    Inspiring anti-tumor regulators were overwhelmed in cervical cancer immune microenvironment and conducive to carcinogenesis.

    Compared to normal cervix, the mRNA level of OX40L/OX40 and Smad3 displayed a decrease in cervical cancer microenvironment. These factors expressed less in high grade squamous carcinoma cell than in low grade lesion, speculating that in immune microenvironment of cervical cancer, the positive role of OX40L/OX40 and Smad3 in up-regulating immune response and repressing the cervical carcinogenesis was impaired. In addition, the less differentiated the cervical cancer cell was, the weaker these enhancers would be in anti-tumor immunological effect, intensifying the unbalance of local immunity and tumorgenesis.

    In cancerous tissues, the level of Smad3mRNA with HPV infection is lower than that in HPV-negative group, cluing us HPV could discourage the distribution of enhancer in local situs towards suppressive side.

     
  3. 3.

    The underlying synergistical effect between congeneric immune factors and the counteraction between alien regulators may aggravate the immune suppression in cervical cancer microenvironment.

    The positive correlation between mRNAs of FoxP3 and CCL22, FoxP3 and CCR4, CCL22 and CCR4 elucidated that FoxP3, CCL22 and CCR4 might synergistically promote immunosuppression. We surmise that one one hand, local overexpression of CCL22 and CCR4 strengthened the differentiation and aggregation of FoxP3 + Treg in the tumor site, thus inhibiting anti-tumor immunity and maintaining a hostile environment . On the other hand, immunosuppressive cytokine IL-4 (interleukin-4) and IL-1β (interleukin-1β) secreted by FoxP3 + Treg could induce the excretion of CCL22 from macrophages, dendric and tumor cells. Meanwhile, FoxP3 could promote CCR4 expression in the same Treg cell. Our results, OX40mRNA positively correlated with Smad3mRNA, but negatively correlated with CCL22mRNA implied that for one thing, as the mRNA level of OX40 and Smad3 were decreased conformably in neoplastic foci and pericarcinous tissues in comparison to normal cervix, the potential cooperative effect of these two factors might be weakened in local microenvironment of cervical cancer. For another thing, the effective immune response of OX40 could be impaired by CCL22 as the high mRNA level of CCL22 in local microenvironment seemed to be inversely related to OX40. No significant relationship was explored between other factors, prompting that there is no direct interaction involved between them in the regulation of immune state. For instance, we did not find any relationship between FoxP3 mRNA and Smad3mRNA.As previously mentioned, phosphorylation of Smad3 is the functional variant in pathways which mediated FoxP3 transcription. It hinted us that whether the lower level of Smad3 mRNA in local cancer microenvironment may leads to the decrease of the ratio of p-Smad3 and total Smad3, thereby repressing the FoxP3 mRNA level.

     

Conclusions

In summary, these results showed that the level pattern of mRNA of FoxP3, CCL22/CCR4, OX40L/OX40 and Smad3 in cervical cancer immune microenvironment distinctly differed from that in normal cervix. Since mRNAs of positive immune factors OX40L/OX40 and Smad3 decreased while negative immune factors FoxP3 and CCL22/CCR4 increased, we infer that negative immune regulation factors conquer and hold the leadership in local immunocompromised microenvironment. Besides, their latent complex relationship not only amplify immune tolerance, but also hinder anti-tumor immune response, which further gives rise to the break of equilibrium of local immunity. Such immune model may involve in the outcome of HPV infection and cervical carcinogenesis. We look forward to subsequent research to uncover the hidden mechanism.

Abbreviations

APC: 

Antigen presenting cell

CCL22: 

Chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 22

CCR4: 

CC chemokine receptor 4

FoxP3: 

Forkhead box protein P3

HR-HPV: 

High-risk human papilloma virus

IL-1β: 

Interleukin-1β

IL-4: 

Interleukin-4

LCs: 

Langerhans cells

NK: 

Natural killer cells

OX40: 

Tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily member 4

OX40L: 

Tumor necrosis factor superfamily member 4

Smad3: 

SMAD family member 3

TGF-β: 

Transforming growth factor-β

Th: 

Helper T cells

TNF-α: 

Tumor necrosis factor-α

Declarations

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

This study was financially supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No.81472428) and Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University (NCET-12-0441).

Availability of data and materials

The data-sets analyzed during the current study was available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Authors’ contributions

XY and MZ conceived the study. MZ, QZ, YL, XW, MP, TY, JZ, HJ and SQ collected samples. MZ, QZ, YG, ST and YY performed the experiment and analyzed the data. DC, QZ and MZ drew the graphs. MZ, YL, XW and LW drafted the manuscript. XY provided consultation and revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of First Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University. The committee’s reference number was No.118.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, First Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University
(2)
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, First Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University

References

  1. Wu H, Zhang J. miR-124 rs531564 polymorphism influences genetic susceptibility to cervical cancer [J]. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2014;7(12):5847–51.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Zhao EF, Bao L, Li C, et al. Changes in epidemiology and clinical characteristics of cervical cancer over the past 50 years [J]. Di Yi Jun Yi Da Xue Xue Bao. 2005;25(6):605–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. de Sanjose S, Diaz M, Castellsague X, et al. Worldwide prevalence and genotype distribution of cervical human papillomavirus DNA in women with normal cytology: a meta-analysis [J]. Lancet Infect Dis. 2007;7(7):453–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Peto J, Gilham C, Deacon J, et al. Cervical HPV infection and neoplasia in a large population-based prospective study: the Manchester cohort [J]. Br J Cancer. 2004;91(5):942–53.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Stanley MA. Immune responses to human papilloma viruses [J]. Indian J Med Res. 2009;130(3):266–76.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Langers I, Renoux U, et al. Natural killer and dendritic cells collaborate in the immune response induced by the vaccine against uterine cervical cancer [J]. Eur J Immunol. 2014;44(12):3585–95.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Senba M, Mori N, et al. Mechanisms of virus immune evasion lead to deveopment from chronic inflammation to cancer formation associated with human papillomavirus infection [J]. Oncol Rev. 2012;6(2):e17. doi:https://doi.org/10.4081/oncol.2012.e17.eCollection. 2012.
  8. Rincon-Orozco B, Halec G, Rosenberger S, et al. Epigenetic silencing of interferon-kappa in human papillomavirus type 16-positive cells [J]. Cancer Res. 2009;69(22):8718–25.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Leong CM, Doorbar J, Nindl I, et al. Deregulation of E-cadherin by human papillomavirus is not confined to high-risk, cancer-causing types [J]. Br J Dermatol. 2010;163(6):1253–63.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Cobbold SP. The mTOR pathway and integrating immune regulation [J]. Immunology. 2013;140(4):391–8.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Li YQ, Liu FF, Zhang XM, et al. Tumor secretion of CCL22 activates intratumoral treg infiltration and is independent prognostic predictor of breast cancer [J]. PLoS One. 2013;8(10):e76379.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Vu MD, Xiao X, Gao W, et al. OX40 costimulation turns off FoxP3+ tregs [J]. Blood. 2007;110(7):2501–10.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Xu T, Ni MM, Huang C, et al. NLRC5 mediates IL-6 and IL-1beta secretion in LX-2 cells and modulated by the NF-kappaB/Smad3 pathway [J]. Inflammation. 2015;38(5):1794–804.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Wolfraim LA, Fernandez TM, Mamura M, et al. Loss of Smad3 in acute T-cell lymphoblastic leukemia [J]. N Engl J Med. 2004;351(6):552–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Kim SH, Ahn S, Kim KH, et al. Smad3 and Smad3 phosphoisoforms are prognostic markers of gastric carcinoma [J]. Dig Dis Sci. 2013;58(4):989–97.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Collison LW, Workman CJ, Kuo TT, et al. The inhibitory cytokine IL-35 contributes to regulatory T-cell function [J]. Nature. 2007;450(7169):566–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Uhlig HH, Coombes J, Mottet C, et al. Characterization of FoxP3(+)CD4(+)CD25(+) and IL-10-secreting CD4(+)CD25(+) T cells during cure of colitis [J]. J Immunol. 2006;177(9):5852–60.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Kim M, Grimmig T, Grimm M, et al. Expression of FoxP3 in colorectal cancer but not in treg cells correlates with disease progression in patients with colorectal cancer [J]. PLoS One. 2013;8(1):e53630.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  19. De Reuver PR, Mehta S, Gill P, et al. Immunoregulatory forkhead Box protein p3-positive lymphocytes Are associated with overall survival in patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors [J]. J Am Coll Surg. 2016;223(3):281–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Lin SZ, Chen KJ, Xu ZY, et al. Prediction of recurrence and survial in hepatocellular carcinoma based on two Cox models mainly determined by FoxP3+ regulatory T cells [J]. Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2013;6(6):594–602.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Winkler I, Wilczynska B, Bojarska-Junak A, et al. Regulatory T lymphocytes and transforming growth factor beta in epithelial ovarian tumors-prognostic significance [J]. J Ovarian Res. 2015;8:39.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Kumai T, Nagato T, Kobayashi H, et al. CCL17 and CCL22/CCR4 signaling is a strong candidate for novel targeted therapy against nasal natural killer/T-cell lymphoma [J]. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2015;64(6):697–705.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  23. Nakamura ES, Koizumi K, Kobayashi M, et al. RANKL-induced CCL22/macrophage-derived chemokine produced from osteoclasts potentially promotes the bone metastasis of lung cancer expressing its receptor CCR4 [J]. Clin Exp Metastasis. 2006;23(1):9–18.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Gobert M, Treilleux I, Bendriss-Vermare N, et al. Regulatory T cells recruited through CCL22/CCR4 are selectively activated in lymphoid infiltrates surrounding primary breast tumors and lead to an adverse clinical outcome [J]. Cancer Res, 2009, 69 (5): 2000–2009.Google Scholar
  25. Woo YL, van den Hende M, Sterling JC, et al. A prospective study on the natural course of low-grade aquamous intraepithelial lesions and the presence of HPV16 E2-, E6 and E7-specific T-cell responses [J]. Int J Cancer. 2010;126(1):133–41.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2017