- Open Access
Serial bone marrow transplantation reveals in vivo expression of the pCLPG retroviral vector
© Fratini and Strauss; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010
- Received: 20 October 2009
- Accepted: 22 January 2010
- Published: 22 January 2010
Gene therapy in the hematopoietic system remains promising, though certain aspects of vector design, such as transcriptional control elements, continue to be studied. Our group has developed a retroviral vector where transgene expression is controlled by p53 with the intention of harnessing the dynamic and inducible nature of this tumor suppressor and transcription factor. We present here a test of in vivo expression provided by the p53-responsive vector, pCLPG. For this, we used a model of serial transplantation of transduced bone marrow cells.
We observed, by flow cytometry, that the eGFP transgene was expressed at higher levels when the pCLPG vector was used as compared to the parental pCL retrovirus, where expression is directed by the native MoMLV LTR. Expression from the pCLPG vector was longer lasting, but did decay along with each sequential transplant. The detection of eGFP-positive cells containing either vector was successful only in the bone marrow compartment and was not observed in peripheral blood, spleen or thymus.
These findings indicate that the p53-responsive pCLPG retrovirus did offer expression in vivo and at a level that surpassed the non-modified, parental pCL vector. Our results indicate that the pCLPG platform may provide some advantages when applied in the hematopoietic system.
- Bone Marrow Cell
- Long Terminal Repeat
- Hematopoietic System
- Serial Transplantation
- Short Term Observation
The merits and shortcomings related to the use of retroviral vectors for laboratory and clinical gene transfer have been intensely studied. Vectors derived from the Moloney Murine Leukemia Virus (MoMLV) hold an important, historical place in the development of clinical gene therapy. These vectors are relatively easy to produce and manipulate, are quite malleable and are extremely efficient, especially when applied ex vivo . However, they have been associated with severe adverse events in clinical trials for the treatment of X-SCID  and the silencing of retroviral expression in vivo has been observed [3, 4].
The MoMLV long terminal repeat (LTR) can be employed to drive transgene expression and is a robust promoter, especially in cultured cells. However, the viral promoter tends to suffer methylation and consequently is silenced, particularly when transduced hematopoietic stem cells (HSC) are transplanted in recipients [3, 4]. Silencing of the MoMLV LTR can be avoided if the transgene contributes to positive selection of those cells that maintain viral expression . In the X-SCID trials, the transgenes provided an advantage related to transduction of growth-promoting signals [6, 7]. Many treatment protocols require the transfer of a therapeutic gene that does not contribute to positive selection. In this situation, prolonged vector expression may require modification of the LTR itself in order to promote transcription and avoid the cellular mechanisms that cause methylation .
In our previous studies, we altered the LTR of a typical MoMLV-derived vector such that transgene expression is driven by p53. This vector, called pCLPG, was shown to express reporter genes at levels superior to the parental vector, pCL, which utilizes the native MoMLV LTR to drive transgene expression . We have also inserted the wild-type p53 cDNA under the control of this p53-responsive promoter and showed that an autoregulatory, positive feedback mechanism was established, resulting in improved expression of p53 as well as greater tumor cell inhibition when tested in tissue culture . However, until now, we had not tested the pCLPG vector in a model that would test its potential for application in vivo.
Since retroviral vectors are best suited for ex vivo gene transfer and one of their typical uses in clinical trials has been in the hematopoietic system, we wished to test the pCLPG vector in such a model. Mouse models of serial transplantation of transduced bone marrow cells have often been used for this purpose since it places pressure on the stem cells to self renew and repopulate the hematopoietic system of the irradiated recipient [10, 11]. In a relatively short period of time, this model can provide rigorous testing of the sustainability of vector expression. In addition, such models can also reveal potential adverse events related to the presence of the vector and transgene .
We show here that the pCLPG vector does indeed support expression in vivo. At least in the bone marrow compartment, expression from the pCLPG vector was sustained at a higher level and for a longer period of time than was seen for pCL. The use of a p53-responsive vector may prove to be an interesting option for gene transfer in the hematopoietic system.
p53-responsiveness of the pCLPG vector in the context of a hematopoietic cell
Serial transplantation of transduced bone marrow
Summary of transplant procedure utilized
Survival of non-transplanted control animals
(n = 3)
(n = 3)
(n = 3)
n = 17
1-1.5 × 107 total cells/donor
1-1.5 × 107 total cells/donor
1-1.5 × 107 total cells/donor
Total number of recpients (female, C57BL/6)
n = 18
n = 17
n = 12
Donor animals used for serial transplant
n = 6a
n = 5b
Short term maintenance of transplant recipients
(n = 6)
(n = 6)
(n = 6)
Long term maintenance of transplant recipients
(n = 6)c
(n = 6)c
(n = 6)c
Evaluation of eGFP expression in cells recovered from transplant recipients
Determination of provirus copy number and chimerism by real-time PCR
Copy number (BMC)b
Evaluation of chimerism was also performed by real time PCR detection of the Y chromosome in BMC recovered from the transplant recipients. In all cases, greater than 95% of the cells contained the Y chromosome, indicating that repopulation of the hematopoietic system in the female recipient mice was due to the implantation of the male BMC.
Representative hematologic analyses of transplant groups after short term observation
Male age-matched mice
7.88 ± 0.10
8.51 ± 0.46
8.41 ± 0.42
8.51 ± 0.40
38.8 ± 1.16
46 ± 4.50
48 ± 4.0
46 ± 4.60
12.92 ± 0.34
11.92 ± 0.19
12.91 ± 0.34
12.92 ± 0.39
Mean globular volume % (MGV)
56.93 ± 3.02
60.83 ± 2.10
62.55 ± 3.50
60.64 ± 3.51
Mean hemoglobin concentration fl
30.21 ± 0.83
18.70 ± 3.68
19.92 ± 0.75
19.70 ± 0.61
Mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration %
21.60 ± 1.80
36.16 ± 4.75
36.86 ± 4.90
37.16 ± 0.15
6.48 ± 0.14
4.27 ± 0.79
4.52 ± 0.98
4.27 ± 0.30
01 ± 0.75
02 ± 0.51
2.4 ± 0.75
02 ± 0.75
02 ± 0.51
02 ± 1.36
03 ± 1.65
03 ± 0.89
68.6 ± 2.68
67.6 ± 2.31
72.6 ± 0.98
77.5 ± 1.72
43.4 ± 2.09
28.75 ± 1.96
27.75 ± 2.25
29 ± 2.29
Representative hematologic analyses of transplant groups after long term observation
Male age-matched mice
5.87 ± 0.034
6.31 ± 0.099
5.93 ± 0.39
6.18 ± 0.31
37.5 ± 1.29
35.6 ± 1.14
40.8 ± 2.39
42 ± 2.45
12.67 ± 0.027
11.57 ± 0.39
11.65 ± 0.43
11.77 ± 0.38
Mean globular volume % (MGV)
63.77 ± 0.099
65.066 ± .011
67.49 ± 0.47
67.92 ± 0.11
Mean hemoglobin concentration fl
21.25 ± 0.036
21.69 ± 0.23
22.64 ± 0.36
22.99 ± 0.15
Mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration %
30.5 ± 2.38
32.49 ± 0.32
31.71 ± 0.45
32.12 ± 0.29
4.7 ± 0.059
4.62 ± .017
3.73 ± 0.26
4.024 ± 0.074
2 ± 0.82
1.4 ± 0.89
0.4 ± 0.55
0.4 ± 0.89
3.75 ± 0.5
1.4 ± 0.54
1.2 ± 0.45
1.6 ± 0.55
63.94 ± 0.077
68.45 ± 0.32
66.082 ± 0.46
65.92 ± 0.43
48 ± 1.14
44.76 ± 1.43
42.43 ± 0.51
42.85 ± 0.71
In vivo treatment with 5-azacytidine corroborates lack of methylation in BMC
Animals from the long term observation groups were treated with 5-azacytidine (5-aza) in vivo, 24-hours prior to sacrifice. By flow cytometric evaluation of eGFP activity, we noted that little or no change was present in cells recovered from the bone marrow compartment, though peripheral blood, spleen and thymus each revealed an extremely modest increase in the number of eGFP-positive cells detected after 5-aza treatment (data not shown).
As an additional measure of the impact of 5-aza, quantification of proviral sequences by real time PCR was performed in samples recovered from both treated and control animals. When corrected for amplification of a genomic segment of the β-Actin gene, no alteration in provirus was observed (data not shown). Taken together, the lack of response to in vivo treatment with 5-aza may suggest that silencing of vector expression was not a significant issue in these assays.
Using a model of serial bone marrow transplantation, we have shown that expression from the p53-dependent pCLPG retroviral vector was superior to that of the parental, constitutive pCL vector. For both vectors, expression was limited to the bone marrow compartment and was not detected in peripheral blood, spleen or thymus. Since the number of eGFP-positive BMC was closely correlated with the provirus copy number detected in these cells, these results suggest that no vector silencing was observed in this compartment. In addition, in vivo treatment with 5-aza did not increase the number of eGFP-positive cells in the bone marrow compartment, corroborating the idea that silencing was not an issue in these cells.
Evaluation of provirus copy number present in the BMC recovered after the short term observation of primary transplant recipient mice suggests that 7/100 or 4/100 cells contained a single pCLPGeGFP or pCLeGFP provirus, respectively. We presume that only a single copy, on average, would have integrated in these cells due to the low overall transduction efficiency. Reports in the literature indicate that multiple copies would be present only at transduction efficiencies above 30% . Moreover, eGFP expression in the BMC of the recipient mice was positive in approximately 7/100 or 4/100 cells recovered from the pCLPGeGFP or pCLeGFP transplant groups, respectively. This correlation between provirus copy number and observation of transgene expression suggests that vector silencing was not a problem, at least in BMC. The lack of vector expression in peripheral blood, thymus and spleen is also consistent with the difficulty in quantifying provirus in these tissues.
For our experiments, we chose to transduce total BMC since this procedure has long been, and continues to be, widely used. For example, classic studies from the group of Donald Kohn have shown methylation of the native MoMLV LTR, but reliable expression from a modified vector when total BMC was transduced and followed by serial transplantation [3, 4, 10, 11, 15]. The work of Andersson et al, 2003, also used total BMC for transduction with a GFP-expressing retrovirus which, upon transplantation, prevented rejection of eGFP-transgenic skin grafts . In 2006, the group of Brian Sorrentino also used the tansduction of total BMC recovered from X-SCID mice followed by transplantation to reveal the phenotypic tendency of these cells to transform .
The ex vivo transduction procedure used here resulted in a relatively low level of gene transfer in bone marrow cells. A recent report indicates that retrovirus produced in NIH3T3-derived packaging cells offers some advantages for the transduction of hematopoietic stem cells, namely the production of fibronectin, yet 293T cells barely produce this protein . The presence of fibronectin in the virus preparation facilitates the preloading of viral particles onto the culture dish. The use of Retronection (recombinant fibronectin fragment CH-296), intended to provide a substrate onto which the viral particles can be seeded, was not advantageous when virus was produced in 293T . In addition, virus pseudotyped with the VSVg envelope is not efficiently preloaded on Retronectin . Both of these findings are consistent with our previous study where virus was produced in 293T cells with either amphotropic or VSVg envelopes and transduction was performed either with or without Retronectin, resulting in little change to transduction efficiency in BMC or K562 [PF and BES, unpublished data]. The use of 293T cells for virus production may be partly to blame for the low transduction efficiency observed in our studies.
As revealed in the short term observation groups of our experiments, the expression of the p53-responsive pCLPG vector was maintained longer and at a higher level than was seen for the parental pCL vector, at least as revealed in the primary and secondary transplant recipients. Loss of pCLPG expression in BMC does not seem to be related to vector silencing, but instead to the gradual loss of transduced cells during successive transplant procedures. In contrast, viral expression in the long term observation groups was quite similar between the two vectors. This implies that the pCLPG, without additional activation of p53, is superior to the pCL vector, at least in BMC and during the first months following transplant.
Taken together, the use of total BMC and the low trasduction efficiency may have contributed to the low level of viral marking in peripheral blood, spleen and thymus. Since the true hematopoieitic stem cells represent only a small portion of BMC, the odds are low that these cells were transduced in our experiments. Though we did not characterize the transduced BMC prior to transplantation, it is possible that those cells which were transduced were of a more committed phenotype. This situation would also be consistent with the loss of viral marking upon successive transplants since the transduced cells would have a finite life span and would be expected to die over time.
Vector silencing by methylation is a common problem in retroviral vectors that use the non-modified MoMLV LTR to drive transgene expression. However, the pCLPG vector was modified in the LTR, prompting us to evaluate its performance in this serial transplantation model. If silencing by methylation had occurred, then treatment with 5-azacytidine should lead to an increase in eGFP-positive cells. Treatment with 5-aza did not result in the alteration of eGFP-positive cells in BMC. Therefore, direct assessment of methylation in the retroviral LTR by methylation-specific sequencing was not performed in this study.
Although further testing is still required, we propose that a p53-responsive vector may be beneficial for gene therapy applications in the hematologic system. For example, the expression of the splice-corrected MDR1 cDNA by pCLPG in HSC could be induced by chemotherapeutic drugs that activate p53, such as doxorubicin. In this scenario, the chemotherapy drug should not only kill tumor cells, but also induce the expression of MDR1 from the pCLPG vector and thus protect the hematopoietic system from the drug's effect, yet removal of the drug would result in the reduction in vector expression.
The insertion of the retroviral vector may induce the unwanted expression of a neighboring oncogene. In the case of pCLPG, the enhancer is dependent on p53 activity, implying that induction of the oncogene and p53 would be juxtaposed and may lead to elimination of these cells through apoptosis coordinated by p53. Lentiviral vectors are thought to be a safer alternative to gamma retroviral vectors . The concept of p53-driven viral expression could be transferred to lentiviral vectors, maintaining the dynamic control over transgene expression and, possibly, gaining the relative safety of a vector that tends to integrate at a distance from gene promoters .
As revealed in the short term observation of primary and secondary transplant recipients, the pCLPG vector provided superior expression as compared to the parental vector. This indicates that gene transfer vectors that utilize p53 to drive transgene expression may be of interest for application in the hematopoietic system.
The pCLeGFP and pCLPGeGFP vectors have been described previously [9, 22]. It should be noted that in our previous work, the pCLPG vector was referred to as pCLPG-ΔU3, and has been re-named for simplicity.
To produce virus-containing supernatant, the indicated viral vectors were co-transfected in the 293T cells as described , except using pCMV-gag-pol and pCMV-VSVg packaging vectors (kindly provided by Richard Mulligan, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA and Jane Burns, University of California, San Diego, USA, respectively). After 24 hours of incubation, the virus-containing supernatant was collected, centrifuged for 5 minutes, 1000 ×g, then the supernatant removed and concentrated by ultracentrifugation (100,000 ×g, 120 min). The viral pellet was resuspended by overnight incubation in Hank's Balanced Salt then aliquoted and stored at -70°C.
Titration of virus preparations
Titration was performed by transducing NIH3T3 cells then counting eGFP-positive cells by flow cytometry. This protocol has been described previously . Typical titers were in the range of 1-3 × 106 green fluorescence units (gfu)/ml before ultracentrifugation and 2 × 108 gfu/ml after.
Temperature sensitive p53 assay
K562 cells were transduced with pCLeGFP or pCLPGeGFP at an MOI of 1 then selected for G418 resistance. These cells were then transduced with a second retroviral vector, pLPCp53(223) (kindly provided by Andrei Gudkov, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland, OH) which encodes the human p53 mutant P223L as well as the puromycin resistance gene. The cells were treated with puromycin, 1 μg/ml, until control cells had died. Approximately 1 × 106 cells of each type were plated in duplicate 6-well dishes. One dish was maintained at 37°C and the other at 32°C for 24 hours before harvesting the cells and analysis by flow cytometry of the percentage of eGFP-positive cells as well as the intensity of eGFP activity, as determined by the cytometry software.
Collection and cultivation of bone marrow cells (BMC)
Animal handling procedures and experimental design was approved by institutional ethics committees (Biomedical Sciences Institute, protocol 097/04, as well as the School of Medicine, USP, research protocol SDS 2832/06/077). Young adult (approximately 90 days old), male C57BL/6 mice (obtained from the Centro de Bioterismo, FM-USP) were injected i.p. with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), 150 mg/kg, and maintained for 7 days. The mice were then sacrificed and their tibias and femurs isolated. BMC were flushed from the bones upon washing with medium (Iscove's Modified Eagle Medium, IMDM, containing 15% fetal calf serum, FCS, Hyclone, USA). The BMC were centrifuged at 1000 ×g for 5 minutes and then resuspended in medium supplemented with recombinant mIL-3 (200 units/ml), hIL-6 (200 units/ml) and murine stem cell factor (mSCF, 2.5 ng/ml). Cytokines were obtained from Peprotech (Mexico). Cells were cultivated in a humidified 37°C, 5% CO2 incubator for 48-72 hours before continuing with the transduction.
Transduction of BMC
Non-tissue culture treated 35 mm Petri dishes were treated with Retronectin (Takara, Japan), 20 μg/cm2, incubated with 1× phosphate buffered saline (PBS) containing 2% FCS for 30 minutes at 37°C, removed and then the treated plates pre-loaded with virus particles. For this, 2 × 107 virus particles were added and allowed to incubate at 37°C for 90 minutes, removed, and a fresh aliquot of virus was added for a second round of pre-loading. BMC cells, 4 × 106 (in medium plus cytokines) were then added to the dish along with a final aliquot of virus preparation, resulting in a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 15. Cells were maintained during 48 hours before proceeding with transplantation.
Transplantation of BMC
Recipient, isogenic young adult female animals were irradiated from a cobalt source, 8.5 Gy with attenuation (with professional assistance from Elisabeth Somesssari, Instituto de Pesquisas em Energia Nuclear, São Paulo). Immediately after irradiation, animals were injected i.v. with 4 × 106 BMC (with or without transduction, as indicated) in 100 μl of 1× PBS. In parallel, irradiated animals were maintained under the same conditions, but without having received a BMC injection, in order to serve as a control of the experimental procedure. Tetracycline, 100 mg/ml, was added to drinking water as a preventative measure to avoid infections and animals were maintained in micro-isolator cages until the controls had died, usually 18-21 days, and then the transplant recipients were maintained in standard cages.
Hematologic analysis of peripheral blood
Blood was collected immediately upon sacrifice by cardiac puncture and mixed with EDTA to prevent coagulation. Differential counts were performed manually with Panotic stained blood smears. Assays were performed by the Centro de Bioterismo, FM-USP.
Isolation of genomic DNA and detection of provirus and chimerism by Real-Time PCR
For the PCR reactions (performed in triplicate), 6.5 ng of gDNA, 200 nM of each primer, 10 μl of 2× SYBR Green PCR Master Mix (Applied Biosystems) and 7.4 μl of water were used. Control reactions without template or without primers were also performed. Amplification was carried out using a 7500 Fast System PCR (Applied Biosystems) under the following conditions: Stage 1, 95°C for 10 min; Stage 2, 40 cycles of 95°C for 15 sec and 60°C for 1 min; Stage 3: 95°C for 15 sec, 60°C for 1 min, 95°C for 15 sec followed by termination at 60°C for 1 min. The primers used were: pCLeGFP Forward (5' CCCGACAACCACTACCTGA-3') and pCLeGFP Reverse (5' TCCACACCCTAACTGACACA 3'), β-Actin Forward (5' AGAGGGAAATCGTGCGTGAC 3') and β-Actin Reverse (5' CAATAGTGATGACCTGGCCGT 3'), Y chromosome Forward (5' GCGCCCCATGAATGCAT 3') and Y chromosome Reverse (5' TCCACCTGCATCCCAGCT 3') with expected amplicons of 191, 137 and 112 base-pairs, respectively. The β-Actin and Y chromosome oligo design was derived from Mortellaro et al . The pCLeGFP oligos (which also serve for detection of pCLPGeGFP) were designed using Primer 3 and Net Primer, then specificity was verified by BLAST. The β-Actin control served to ensure that variations were not due to errors in gDNA quantification and handling.
In vivo treatment with 5-azacytidine
Animals maintained for long term observation (n = 6) in each group were subdivided. For each group, 3 animals were maintained as controls and the other 3 were injected i.p. with 1 mg/kg of 5-azacytidine (Sigma) in 1× PBS. After 24-hours, all animals were sacrificed and BMC, peripheral blood, thymus and spleen were collected for further analysis.
Veronica Coelho (InCor, FM-USP) for use of the flow cytometer, Elisabeth Somessari (IPEN, São Paulo) for assistance with irradiation procedures, Roger Chammas (FM-USP) and the staff of the Centro de Bioterismo (FM-USP) for their assistance with animal handling and hematologic assays. This work was supported by FAPESP (00/12156-5, 03/08822-8, 07/50210-0) and CNPq (420036/2005-9, 473587/2004-1).
- Nair V: Retrovirus-induced oncogenesis and safety of retroviral vectors. Curr Opin Mol Ther 2008, 10: 431-438.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pike-Overzet K, Burg M, Wagemaker G, van Dongen JJ, Staal FJ: New insights and unresolved issues regarding insertional mutagenesis in X-linked SCID gene therapy. Mol Ther 2007, 15: 1910-1916. 10.1038/sj.mt.6300297PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Challita PM, Kohn DB: Lack of expression from a retroviral vector after transduction of murine hematopoietic stem cells is associated with methylation in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1994, 91: 2567-2571. 10.1073/pnas.91.7.2567PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Challita PM, Skelton D, el-Khoueiry A, Yu XJ, Weinberg K, Kohn DB: Multiple modifications in cis elements of the long terminal repeat of retroviral vectors lead to increased expression and decreased DNA methylation in embryonic carcinoma cells. J Virol 1995, 69: 748-755.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Hacein-Bey H, Cavazzana-Calvo M, Le Deist F, Dautry-Varsat A, Hivroz C, Riviere I, Danos O, Heard JM, Sugamura K, Fischer A, De Saint Basile G: gamma-c gene transfer into SCID X1 patients' B-cell lines restores normal high-affinity interleukin-2 receptor expression and function. Blood 1996, 87: 3108-3116.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Deichmann A, Hacein-Bey-Abina S, Schmidt M, Garrigue A, Brugman MH, Hu J, Glimm H, Gyapay G, Prum B, Fraser CC, Fischer N, Schwarzwaelder K, Siegler ML, de Ridder D, Pike-Overzet K, Howe SJ, Thrasher AJ, Wagemaker G, Abel U, Staal FJ, Delabesse E, Villeval JL, Aronow B, Hue C, Prinz C, Wissler M, Klanke C, Weissenbach J, Alexander I, Fischer A, von Kalle C, Cavazzana-Calvo M: Vector integration is nonrandom and clustered and influences the fate of lymphopoiesis in SCID-X1 gene therapy. J Clin Invest 2007, 117: 2225-2232. 10.1172/JCI31659PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Schwarzwaelder K, Howe SJ, Schmidt M, Brugman MH, Deichmann A, Glimm H, Schmidt S, Prinz C, Wissler M, King DJ, Zhang F, Parsley KL, Gilmour KC, Sinclair J, Bayford J, Peraj R, Pike-Overzet K, Staal FJ, de Ridder D, Kinnon C, Abel U, Wagemaker G, Gaspar HB, Thrasher AJ, von Kalle C: Gammaretrovirus-mediated correction of SCID-X1 is associated with skewed vector integration site distribution in vivo. J Clin Invest 2007, 117: 2241-2249. 10.1172/JCI31661PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Strauss BE, Costanzi-Strauss E: pCLPG: a p53-driven retroviral system. Virology 2004, 321: 165-172. 10.1016/j.virol.2003.12.021PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Strauss BE, Bajgelman MC, Costanzi-Strauss E: A novel gene transfer strategy that combines promoter and transgene activities for improved tumor cell inhibition. Cancer Gene Ther 2005, 12: 935-946. 10.1038/sj.cgt.7700846PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Robbins PB, Skelton DC, Yu XJ, Halene S, Leonard EH, Kohn DB: Consistent, persistent expression from modified retroviral vectors in murine hematopoietic stem cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1998, 95: 10182-10187. 10.1073/pnas.95.17.10182PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Robbins PB, Yu XJ, Skelton DM, Pepper KA, Wasserman RM, Zhu L, Kohn DB: Increased probability of expression from modified retroviral vectors in embryonal stem cells and embryonal carcinoma cells. J Virol 1997, 71: 9466-9474.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Li Z, Dullmann J, Schiedlmeier B, Schmidt M, von Kalle C, Meyer J, Forster M, Stocking C, Wahlers A, Frank O, Ostertag W, Kuhlcke K, Eckert HG, Fehse B, Baum C: Murine leukemia induced by retroviral gene marking. Science 2002, 296: 497. 10.1126/science.1068893PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bajgelman MC, Strauss BE: The DU145 human prostate carcinoma cell line harbors a temperature-sensitive allele of p53. Prostate 2006, 66: 1455-1462. 10.1002/pros.20462PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kustikova OS, Wahlers A, Kuhlcke K, Stahle B, Zander AR, Baum C, Fehse B: Dose finding with retroviral vectors: correlation of retroviral vector copy numbers in single cells with gene transfer efficiency in a cell population. Blood 2003, 102: 3934-3937. 10.1182/blood-2003-05-1424PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Halene S, Wang L, Cooper RM, Bockstoce DC, Robbins PB, Kohn DB: Improved expression in hematopoietic and lymphoid cells in mice after transplantation of bone marrow transduced with a modified retroviral vector. Blood 1999, 94: 3349-3357.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Andersson G, Denaro M, Johnson K, Morgan P, Sullivan A, Houser S, Patience C, White-Scharf ME, Down JD: Engraftment of retroviral EGFP-transduced bone marrow in mice prevents rejection of EGFP-transgenic skin grafts. Molecular Therapy: the Journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy 2003, 8: 385-391.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Shou Y, Ma Z, Lu T, Sorrentino BP: Unique risk factors for insertional mutagenesis in a mouse model of XSCID gene therapy. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2006, 103: 11730-11735. 10.1073/pnas.0603635103PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sondergaard CS, Haldrup C, Beer C, Andersen B, Kohn DB, Pedersen L: Preloading potential of retroviral vectors is packaging cell clone dependent and centrifugation onto CH-296 ensures highest transduction efficiency. Hum Gene Ther 2009, 20: 337-349. 10.1089/hum.2008.140PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kuhlcke K, Fehse B, Schilz A, Loges S, Lindemann C, Ayuk F, Lehmann F, Stute N, Fauser AA, Zander AR, Eckert HG: Highly efficient retroviral gene transfer based on centrifugation-mediated vector preloading of tissue culture vessels. Mol Ther 2002, 5: 473-478. 10.1006/mthe.2002.0566PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Montini E, Cesana D, Schmidt M, Sanvito F, Ponzoni M, Bartholomae C, Sergi LS, Benedicenti F, Ambrosi A, Di Serio C, Doglioni C, von Kalle C, Naldini L: Hematopoietic stem cell gene transfer in a tumor-prone mouse model uncovers low genotoxicity of lentiviral vector integration. Nat Biotechnol 2006, 24: 687-696. 10.1038/nbt1216PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wu X, Li Y, Crise B, Burgess SM: Transcription start regions in the human genome are favored targets for MLV integration[comment]. Science 2003, 300: 1749-1751. 10.1126/science.1083413PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bajgelman MC, Costanzi-Strauss E, Strauss BE: Exploration of critical parameters for transient retrovirus production. J Biotechnol 2003, 103: 97-106. 10.1016/S0168-1656(03)00103-2PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Naviaux RK, Costanzi E, Haas M, Verma IM: The pCL vector system: rapid production of helper-free, high-titer, recombinant retroviruses. Journal of Virology 1996, 70: 5701-5705.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Mortellaro A, Hernandez RJ, Guerrini MM, Carlucci F, Tabucchi A, Ponzoni M, Sanvito F, Doglioni C, Di Serio C, Biasco L, Follenzi A, Naldini L, Bordignon C, Roncarolo MG, Aiuti A: Ex vivo gene therapy with lentiviral vectors rescues adenosine deaminase (ADA)-deficient mice and corrects their immune and metabolic defects. Blood 2006, 108: 2979-2988. 10.1182/blood-2006-05-023507PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.