Open Access

High pathogenicity and low genetic evolution of avian paramyxovirus type I (Newcastle disease virus) isolated from live bird markets in Uganda

  • Denis K Byarugaba1Email author,
  • Kizito K Mugimba1,
  • John B Omony1,
  • Martin Okitwi1,
  • Agnes Wanyana1,
  • Maxwell O Otim2,
  • Halid Kirunda3,
  • Jessica L Nakavuma1,
  • Angélique Teillaud4, 5,
  • Mathilde C Paul5, 4 and
  • Mariette F Ducatez4, 5Email author
Virology Journal201411:173

https://doi.org/10.1186/1743-422X-11-173

Received: 26 August 2014

Accepted: 23 September 2014

Published: 1 October 2014

Abstract

Background

Newcastle disease is still a serious disease of poultry especially in backyard free-range production systems despite the availability of cross protective vaccines. Healthy-looking poultry from live bird markets have been suspected as a major source of disease spread although limited studies have been conducted to ascertain the presence of the virulent strains in the markets and to understand how they are related to outbreak strains.

Methods

This study evaluated the occurrence of Newcastle disease virus in samples collected from poultry in live bird markets across Uganda. The isolates were pathoyped using standard methods (mean death time (MDT), intracelebral pathogenicity index (ICPI), and sequencing of the fusion protein cleavage site motif) and also phylogenetically analysed after sequencing of the full fusion and hemagglutin-neuraminidase genes. The isolates were classified into genotypes and subgenotypes based on the full fusion protein gene classification system and compared with other strains in the region and world-wide.

Results

Virulent avian paramyxovirus type I (APMV-1) (Newcastle disease virus) was isolated in healthy-looking poultry in live bird markets. The viruses belonged to a new subgenotype, Vd, in genotype V, and clustered together with Tanzania and Kenya strains. They harbored low genetic diversity.

Conclusion

The occurrence of virulent AMPV-1 strains in live bird markets may serve as sources of Newcastle disease outbreaks in non-commercial farms.

Keywords

Newcastle disease virus Live bird markets Genetic diversity Pathogenicity Uganda

Background

Newcastle disease is a highly contagious disease affecting chickens and other poultry species and wild birds. It devastates unvaccinated flocks in periodic outbreaks resulting in up to 70-100% mortality, which is a big loss to the households. It is caused by RNA viruses of the Avian Paramyxovirus type 1 (APMV-1), (synonym: Newcastle disease virus, NDV) [1]. Based on clinical signs, these viruses have been grouped by virulence phenotypes: asymptomatic, lentogenic, mesogenic, and velogenic strains reflecting increasing levels of virulence. Velogens, the most virulent viruses, are those that may cause extensive hemorrhagic lesions, particularly in the gastrointestinal tract (viscerotropic), and/or a predominance of nervous signs (neurotropic) as well as respiratory signs. The lentogenic strains are common among domestic poultry and wild bird populations with insignificant clinical symptoms.

Although the disease is endemic in most African countries, there are still limited studies regarding the ecology, molecular epidemiology, genetic diversity, and distribution of NDV on the continent, not to mention the gap in field vaccine efficacy studies. Most research has focused mainly on basic epidemiology especially during ND outbreaks in poultry and it is believed ND in village chickens is attributed to birds that are shedding virus during and after incubation or post vaccination [2, 3]. It is thought that while vaccination confers protection, some birds continue shedding the virus while appearing healthy. It has been suggested that outbreaks in the dry season are not due to better virus survival under these conditions but to higher trading of birds during this period [4]. Markets may serve as a source of Newcastle disease infection and contribute to its spread as infected birds not showing clinical signs are sold before they come down with the disease.

Genetically, NDV strains are broadly divided into avirulent and virulent subtypes on the basis of the precursor fusion (F) protein cleavage activation site that must be cleaved into F1 and F2 in order for the virus to be infectious. The virulent strains have more basic amino acids than their avirulent counterparts: 112(R/K)RQ(R/K)R*F117 and 112(G/E)(K/R)Q(G/E)R*L117 motifs at the cleavage site for virulent and avirulent viruses, respectively [5]. Biologically the virulent forms by international agreement for purposes of trade [5] are determined with intracerebral pathogenicity indices (ICPI) of ≥ 0.7 but they can also be evaluated by mean death time (MDT) and intravenous pathogenicity index (IVPI) methods.

The genetic classification of the APMV-1 continues to evolve. The simultaneous use of two systems for genotyping APMV-1 created some confusion and lineages and genotypes classification have been reported under different systems. Aldous et al. described a clustering method for the APMV-1 based on the precursor fusion protein cleavage activation site [6]. Recently a more rational genotyping method was proposed by Diel et al. based on mean interpopulational evolutionary distances of the full F protein with cutoff values to assign new genotypes (>10% mean interpopulational evolutionary distance) and new sub-genotypes (3 to 10% mean interpopulational evolutionary distance) [7]. While both systems agree to class I viruses having a single lineage, the class II under Diel et al. contained 15 genetic groups including 10 previously established (I-IX, and XI) and five new genotypes (X, XII, XIII, XIV and XV) [7]. This new unified nomenclature system is expected to provide a clearer and more uniform classification system of NDV isolates and facilitate common understanding of the NDV epidemiology, evolution, disease control and diagnosis. The drawback is that it requires extra work to obtain the F gene full sequences.

Genotyping based on other APMV-1 genes still concur with the basic grouping into classes I and II with class II viruses comprising the vast majority of sequenced NDV. This includes most of the virus isolates recovered from poultry (gallinaceous birds) and from pet and wild birds [8]. Phylogenetic studies of both the F and the hemagglutinin-neuraminidase (HN) protein genes of NDV have been used for most molecular epidemiologic analyses and characterization of NDV into specific lineages [9] even prior to the proposed Diel at al. classification [7]. Restriction enzyme site mapping of the F protein gene and sequence analysis have also been used to classify NDV isolates into seven genotypes and was the basis for identification of a novel genotype of NDV isolates from Uganda reported in 2004 [10]. Different lineages have been described in many parts of Africa basing on the fusion protein cleavage site [6] and a few are beginning to use the system described by Diel et al., [7, 11, 12]. Snoeck et al. thus recently completed the classification by Diel et al. [7] on the same criteria and showed that 17 NDV class II genotypes (named I to XVIII but with no genotype XV) co-circulate worldwide [11]. The purpose of this study was to assess the occurrence of NDV pathotypes in live bird markets across Uganda and to determine their genetic diversity and relatedness using the new NDV nomenclature.

Results and discussion

In total, 1,357 samples were collected from which 114 isolates were recovered (8.7% prevalence by isolation) during the study period and only 19 paired samples yielded virus from both tracheal and cloacal swabs. The isolates were recovered in almost all the markets across the country (Figure 1). The northern region had the highest isolation rate of 22.1%, followed by central region at 13.1%, then the eastern region at 11.2% and the lowest prevalence was in the western region at 6.9%.
Figure 1

Areas in Uganda (East Africa) where samples were collected. The map shows the distribution of representative isolates that were sequenced throughout the country. The green spheres show area of origin and number of samples while the red triangles show where sequence data originated.

Most of these markets sold chickens and indeed most of the isolates (109 isolates from 1250 chicken samples; 8.7% isolation rate) were from chickens. Only two isolates were obtained from thirty four turkeys samples (5.8%) (NDV/turkey/Uganda/MU041/2011 and NDV/turkey/Uganda/MU042/2011) and three isolates from seventy three ducks samples (5.2%) (NDV/duck/Uganda/MU062/2011, NDV/duck/Uganda/MU078/2011 and NDV/duck/Uganda/MU079/2011). None of the turkeys or ducks was showing any signs of disease at the time of sample collection, while some of the chickens were showing symptoms of ND at the time of sample collection with an isolation rate of 28.6% (6/21) and 9.0% (108/1229) from sick and healthy chickens respectively.

Biological characterization of isolates

Intracelebral pathogenicity indices (ICPI) and mean death time (MDT) methods demonstrated that all the isolates were virulent with variations in virulence. According to the values of 112 isolates on which MDT was performed, most of the isolates (85%: 95/112) were velogenic while the remaining (15%: 17/112) were mesogenic (only data values for isolates for which full sequences for either F or HN or both genes are shown in Table 1, the rest of the data is not shown). According to ICPI values, all the isolates had very high values ranging from 1.60- 1.86 (except isolate NDV/chicken/Uganda/MU013/2011 with ICPI of 0.35) indicating that they were highly virulent. The isolates were further assessed by examining the amino acids sequences of the fusion protein (F0) at position 112–117 at the cleavage site and all had a “112RRQKR*F117” motif which confirmed them as virulent (Table 1).
Table 1

Biological characteristics of NDV isolated in this study

Isolate number

District of origin

MDT (hrs)

ICPI

F0 cleavage site motif (Pos: 111–118)

Accession # for full HN gene

Accession # for full F gene

Pathotype

NDV/chicken/Uganda/MU001/2011

MASAKA

46.2

1.75

GRRQKR’FV

HG937535

HG937567

V

NDV/chicken/Uganda/MU004/2011

MASAKA

46.4

1.76

GRRQKR’FV

1

2

V

NDV/chicken/Uganda/MU005/2011

MASAKA

47.8

1.77

GRRQKR’FV

1

2

V

NDV/chicken/Uganda/MU007/2011

MASAKA

46

1.76

GRRQKR’FV

HG937536

HG937568

V

NDV/chicken/Uganda/MU009/2011

MASAKA

48

1.78

GRRQKR’FV

HG937537

HG937569

V

NDV/chicken/Uganda/MU010/2011

MASAKA

46.8

1.79

GRRQKR’FV

HG937538

HG937570

V

NDV/chicken/Uganda/MU013/2011+

MUKONO

80.1

0.35

GRRQKR’FV

HG937539

HG937571

M

NDV/chicken/Uganda/MU014/2011*

MUKONO

54.2

1.77

GRRQKR’FV

HG937540

 

V

NDV/chicken/Uganda/MU019/2011

WAKISO

68.8

1.68

GRRQKR’FV

HG937541

HG937572

M

NDV/chicken/Uganda/MU022/2011*

ABIM

44.8

1.77

GRRQKR’FV

HG937542

 

V

NDV/chicken/Uganda/MU024/2011

ABIM

ND

ND

GRRQKR’FV

 

HG937573

 

NDV/chicken/Uganda/MU026/2011

BUGIRI

74.5

1.61

GRRQKR’FV

HG937543

HG937574

M

NDV/chicken/Uganda/MU028/2011

BUGIRI

40.2

1.79

GRRQKR’FV

3

4

V

NDV/chicken/Uganda/MU029/2011*

BUGIRI

40.1

1.78

GRRQKR’FV

HG937544

 

V

NDV/chicken/Uganda/MU030/2011*

IGANGA

36.8

1.78

GRRQKR’FV

HG937545

 

V

NDV/chicken/Uganda/MU031/2011*

IGANGA

46.9

1.78

GRRQKR’FV

HG937546

 

V

NDV/chicken/Uganda/MU032/2011

IGANGA

36.8

1.77

GRRQKR’FV

 

HG937575

V

NDV/chicken/Uganda/MU033/2011

IGANGA

40.2

1.78

GRRQKR’FV

 

HG937576

V

NDV/chicken/Uganda/MU035/2011

IGANGA

44.2

1.75

GRRQKR’FV

HG937547

HG937577

V

NDV/chicken/Uganda/MU037/2011

KOTIDO

68.2

1.7

GRRQKR’FV

 

HG937578

M

NDV/chicken/Uganda/MU038/2011*

KOTIDO

71.2

1.69

GRRQKR’FV

  

M

NDV/chicken/Uganda/MU039/2011

KUMI

48.6

1.7

GRRQKR’FV

HG937548

HG937579

V

NDV/chicken/Uganda/MU040/2011

KUMI

58.9

ND

GRRQKR’FV

 

HG937580

V

NDV/chicken/Uganda/MU044/2011

NAMUTUMBA

56.8

1.66

GRRQKR’FV

 

HG937581

V

NDV/chicken/Uganda/MU050/2011

ARUA

50.6

1.75

GRRQKR’FV

 

HG937582

V

NDV/chicken/Uganda/MU052/2011*

ARUA

38.4

1.8

GRRQKR’FV

HG937550

 

V

NDV/chicken/Uganda/MU054/2011*

ARUA

38.4

1.82

GRRQKR’FV

HG937551

 

V

NDV/chicken/Uganda/MU056/2011

ARUA

54.4

1.67

GRRQKR’FV

HG937552

HG937583

V

NDV/chicken/Uganda/MU058/2011*

ARUA

34.6

1.78

GRRQKR’FV

HG937535

 

V

NDV/chicken/Uganda/MU059/2011*

ARUA

48.2

1.76

GRRQKR’FV

HG937553

 

V

NDV/duck/Uganda/MU062/2011

ARUA

58

1.74

GRRQKR’FV

 

HG937584

V

NDV/chicken/Uganda/MU063/2011

ARUA

48.6

1.76

GRRQKR’FV

 

5

V

NDV/chicken/Uganda/MU069/2011

KIRYANDONGO

42.3

1.79

GRRQKR’FV

HG937554

HG937585

V

NDV/chicken/Uganda/MU071/2011

KIRYANDONGO

48.8

1.75

GRRQKR’FV

HG937555

HG937586

V

NDV/chicken/Uganda/MU072/2011*

KIRYANDONGO

38.2

1.79

GRRQKR’FV

HG937556

 

V

NDV/chicken/Uganda/MU074/2011

KOBOKO

48.2

1.77

GRRQKR’FV

HG937557

HG937587

V

NDV/chicken/Uganda/MU077/2011*

KOBOKO

51.1

1.75

GRRQKR’FV

HG937558

 

V

NDV/chicken/Uganda/MU083/2011*

NEBBI

48.2

1.76

GRRQKR’FV

HG937559

 

V

NDV/chicken/Uganda/MU084/2011

NEBBI

64.2

1.62

GRRQKR’FV

HG937560

HG937588

M

NDV/chicken/Uganda/MU090/2011

GULU

46.2

1.77

GRRQKR’FV

HG937561

HG9375689

V

NDV/chicken/Uganda/MU091/2011*

GULU

44.3

1.83

GRRQKR’FV

HG937562

 

V

NDV/chicken/Uganda/MU096/2011*

GULU

56.5

ND

GRRQKR’FV

HG937563

 

V

NDV/chicken/Uganda/MU098/2011*

GULU

44.2

1.77

GRRQKR’FV

HG937564

 

V

NDV/chicken/Uganda/MU099/2011*

GULU

50.2

1.75

GRRQKR’FV

6

 

V

NDV/chicken/Uganda/MU102/2011*

GULU

37.6

1.79

GRRQKR’FV

7

 

V

NDV/chicken/Uganda/MU105/2011*

GULU

55.7

1.74

GRRQKR’FV

7

 

V

NDV/chicken/Uganda/MU108/2011*

KABALE

49.8

1.72

GRRQKR’FV

HG937565

 

V

NDV/chicken/Uganda/MU111/2011

KASESE

52.1

1.86

GRRQKR’FV

HG937566

HG937590

V

NDV/chicken/Uganda/MU113/2011

KASESE

56.4

ND

GRRQKR’FV

 

HG937591

V

The table presents isolates for which full HN or F genes or both were sequenced. ND = Not done; V = velogenic; M = mesogenic; the pathotype was based on MDT values as described in materials and methods; *only partial F gene sequences were obtained for these isolates with FIP1-FIP2 primers targeting the F cleavage site area(Kho, Mohd-Azmi et al. [32]). 1HN gene sequences identical to HN of NDV/chicken/Uganda/MU001/2011 (accession number: HG937535); 2 F gene sequences identical to F of NDV/chicken/Uganda/MU001/2011 (accession number: HG937567); 3HN gene sequences identical to HN of NDV/chicken/Uganda/MU026/2011 (accession number: HG937543); 4 F gene sequences identical to F of NDV/chicken/Uganda/MU026/2011(accession number: HG937574); F gene sequence identical to F of NDV/duck/Uganda/MU062/2011 (accession number: HG937584); HN gene sequences identical to HN of NDV/chicken/Uganda/MU096/2011 (accession number: HG937563); 7HN gene sequences identical to HN of NDV/chicken/Uganda/MU098/2011 (accession number: HG937564). +MDT and ICPI were performed twice for NDV/chicken/Uganda/MU013/2011 with little difference; the average values shown in the Table.

Phylogenetics analysis of Ugandan NDV isolates

A total of 49 representative isolates were fully sequenced for either F (29 isolates) or HN (38 isolates) genes. Of these, 19 isolates were sequenced for both F and HN genes. All the 49 isolates were sequenced for the cleavage site of the F gene and all harbored a multibasic “112RRQKR*F117” motif at the site, suggesting a velogenic phenotype. These isolates also had a valine amino acid (aa) at position 118, and clustered with genotype V viruses [7, 11] which corresponds to lineage 3c according to Aldous et al. [6] and the few previously available Ugandan NDV sequences for both their F (Figure 2) and HN (Figure 3) genes.
Figure 2

Phylogenetic trees (ML trees) of the fusion (F) gene of Ugandan Newcastle disease virus (NDV) isolates at the nucleotide level. Partial F gene sequences are indicated with a “*” symbol after the strain name. A single representative virus was selected for strains with identical nucleotide sequences: NDV/chicken/Uganda/MU001/2011 was identical to NDV/chicken/Uganda/MU004/2011 and NDV/chicken/Uganda/MU005/2011; NDV/chicken/Uganda/MU026/2011 to NDV/chicken/Uganda/MU028/2011; and NDV/duck/Uganda/MU062/2011 to NDV/chicken/Uganda/MU063/2011. The F sequences of our Ugandan NDV isolates were compared with A) all full F gene sequences available in GenBank database: 1209 sequences, and B) the reference vaccine strain Lasota, a representative strain for each of the genotype V subgenotypes, and all the East African NDV strains available in the database (indicated with an open circle).

Figure 3

Phylogenetic tree (ML tree) of the hemagglutinin-neuraminidase (HN) gene of Ugandan Newcastle disease virus (NDV) isolates at the nucleotide level. The HN sequences of our Ugandan NDV isolates were compared with relevant virus sequences available in GenBank database: the reference vaccine strain Lasota, all the East African NDV strains available in the database (indicated with an open circle), Ethiopian strains, and a representative strain for each of the genotype V subgenotypes. Partial HN gene sequences are indicated with a “*” symbol after the strain name. A single representative virus was selected for strains with identical nucleotide sequences: NDV/chicken/Uganda/MU001/2011 was identical to NDV/chicken/Uganda/MU004/2011 and NDV/chicken/Uganda/MU005/2011; NDV/chicken/Uganda/MU007/2011 to NDV/chicken/Uganda/MU009/2011; NDV/chicken/Uganda/MU026/2011 to NDV/chicken/Uganda/MU028/2011; NDV/chicken/Uganda/MU059/2011 to NDV/duck/Uganda/MU062/2011 and NDV/chicken/Uganda/MU063/2011; NDV/chicken/Uganda/MU096/2011 to NDV/chicken/Uganda/MU099/2011 and NDV/chicken/Uganda/MU102/2011; and NDV/chicken/Uganda/MU098/2011 to NDV/chicken/Uganda/MU105/2011.

To complete the recent efforts on NDV classification with the criteria defined by Diel et al. [7], we aimed at (i) confirming the robustness of genotype V after the addition of new F gene sequences, and (ii) redefining sub-genotypes within genotype V. As shown on Figure 2a and 2b, genotype V was clearly supported by the ML tree topology and by a high bootstrap value (99, Figure 2a). Phylogenetic analyses carried out on the basis of the first 375 nucleotides of the F gene confirmed the strains genotypes (data not shown). Table 2 summarizes the evolutionary distances between class II NDV genotypes. All evolutionary distances between genotype V sequences and their class II NDV counterparts (numbers in bold in Table 2) were >10%, confirming the robustness of genotype V. Within genotype V, the East African viruses seemed to cluster separately from sub-genotypes Va, Vb, and Vc viruses (Figure 2a, node supported by a bootstrap value of 99). The ML tree findings were confirmed by evolutionary distances comparisons: distances between the subgenotype Vd East African NDV viruses included in the analysis and Va, Vb and Vc sub-genotypes ranged between 10 and 13% (Table 3), which is higher than the distance required for a new sub-genotype to be defined (3 to 10%, [7]). The analysis of evolutionary distance between genotypes was carried out considering the sub-genotype Vd as a full genotype and showed distances ranging between 11.3 and 23.9% between Vd viruses and the 17 other genotypes (11.3% between Vd and V; 23.9% between Vd and XI, data not shown). However it seems difficult to consider East African NDV viruses (Vd) as a distinct full genotype when looking at the tree topography only.
Table 2

Estimates of evolutionary distances (in number of substitutions per site) over sequence pairs between genotypes of class II

Genotype (number of sequences analyzed)

I

II

III

IV

IX

V

VI

VII

XII

VIII

X

XI

XIII

XIV

XVI

XVII

XVIII

I (n = 113)

 

0.009

0.009

0.008

0.008

0.011

0.010

0.012

0.010

0.008

0.013

0.011

0.011

0.013

0.011

0.012

0.012

II (n = 128)

0.118

 

0.010

0.010

0.010

0.013

0.012

0.014

0.011

0.009

0.015

0.014

0.013

0.017

0.013

0.014

0.013

III (n = 9)

0.103

0.118

 

0.008

0.009

0.011

0.010

0.012

0.010

0.010

0.013

0.012

0.011

0.014

0.011

0.013

0.011

IV (n = 6)

0.101

0.115

0.074

 

0.008

0.010

0.009

0.011

0.008

0.010

0.010

0.011

0.010

0.012

0.009

0.011

0.011

IX (n = 25)

0.104

0.120

0.081

0.073

 

0.011

0.010

0.012

0.010

0.010

0.012

0.012

0.011

0.014

0.011

0.012

0.011

V (n = 124)

0.179

0.193

0.163

0.140

0.161

 

0.009

0.010

0.009

0.013

0.014

0.011

0.010

0.012

0.010

0.011

0.010

VI (n = 139)

0.161

0.179

0.149

0.120

0.148

0.144

 

0.009

0.008

0.011

0.013

0.008

0.008

0.011

0.009

0.010

0.009

VII (n = 312)

0.170

0.195

0.154

0.133

0.157

0.158

0.124

 

0.010

0.013

0.015

0.009

0.009

0.011

0.011

0.010

0.009

XII (n = 8)

0.139

0.154

0.125

0.097

0.121

0.131

0.106

0.119

 

0.011

0.013

0.009

0.008

0.011

0.009

0.010

0.010

VIII (n = 4)

0.104

0.109

0.118

0.114

0.114

0.185

0.166

0.175

0.151

 

0.014

0.013

0.012

0.015

0.012

0.013

0.013

X (n = 19)

0.177

0.188

0.161

0.115

0.151

0.206

0.197

0.212

0.181

0.185

 

0.015

0.014

0.017

0.013

0.015

0.015

XI (n = 4)

0.171

0.193

0.154

0.135

0.155

0.160

0.114

0.103

0.114

0.173

0.211

 

0.007

0.010

0.011

0.008

0.008

XIII (n = 27)

0.167

0.189

0.154

0.129

0.146

0.154

0.121

0.105

0.115

0.173

0.203

0.096

 

0.009

0.010

0.008

0.007

XIV (n = 52)

0.203

0.234

0.197

0.170

0.196

0.184

0.150

0.140

0.151

0.208

0.250

0.126

0.126

 

0.013

0.010

0.010

XVI (n = 4)

0.151

0.172

0.142

0.111

0.139

0.152

0.138

0.154

0.118

0.157

0.191

0.150

0.141

0.180

 

0.012

0.011

XVII (n = 54)

0.171

0.202

0.172

0.149

0.162

0.161

0.136

0.127

0.134

0.182

0.216

0.114

0.112

0.127

0.164

 

0.008

XVIII (n = 15)

0.176

0.189

0.163

0.145

0.155

0.159

0.122

0.119

0.127

0.178

0.208

0.104

0.101

0.125

0.159

0.104

 

The number of base substitutions per site from averaging over all sequence pairs between groups are shown. Standard error estimate(s) are shown above the diagonal, in italic font. Analyses were conducted using the Maximum Composite Likelihood model. The rate variation among sites was modeled with a gamma distribution (shape parameter = 1). All positions containing gaps and missing data were eliminated. Numbers in boldface refer to genotype V viruses.

Table 3

Estimates of evolutionary distances (in number of substitutions per site) over sequence pairs between sub-genotypes V

Genotype (number of sequences analyzed)

Vd

Va

Vb

Vc

Vd (n = 25)

 

0.011

0.008

0.010

Va (n = 45)

0.128

 

0.007

0.006

Vb (n = 33)

0.101

0.101

 

0.007

Vc (n = 5)

0.118

0.066

0.093

 

The number of base substitutions per site from averaging over all sequence pairs between groups are shown. Standard error estimate(s) are shown above the diagonal, in italic font. Analyses were conducted using the Maximum Composite Likelihood model. The rate variation among sites was modeled with a gamma distribution (shape parameter = 1). All positions containing gaps and missing data were eliminated. Numbers in boldface refer to sub-genotype Vd.

We also compared the Uganda strains with the genotype Vd viruses from East Africa. The Ugandan strains could only be differentiated from the Kenyan strains by substitutions in the HN protein by only two amino acids Y205F and A546V. However there were residues shared by Kenyan and Ugandan strains at positions S440N and T48A: half of the Uganda isolates shared the same amino acids S440 and T48 with Kenyan isolates. The F-protein did not have any specific residues that differentiated between the Ugandan and other genotype Vd East Africa strains.

In an attempt to estimate whether the current vaccine strain in use in Uganda could be effectively inducing protective antibodies against the circulating field strains, we compared the major neutralizing antibody epitopes previously reported [11, 12] within the F and HN proteins between the Lasota vaccine strain and our field isolates from this study. This revealed that all the Ugandan and indeed the East Africa Vd isolates shared similar residues D72, E74, A75, K78, A79, L343 and 151ILRLKESIAATNEAVHEVTDG171 in the F-protein with the Lasota vaccine strain. In the HN protein, both the Uganda strains and the Lasota vaccine strain also shared similar neutralizing antibody epitopes residues; D287, E347, D349, Y350, R353, K356, R513, I514 (except for 2 strains), S519, S521 and N569. The neutralizing epitopes of the Ugandan strains however differed from the Lasota strain at some residues. The Uganda strains had R333 (except one strain-MU069) and N569 while the Lasota had K333 and D569.

Genetic diversity of NDV in Uganda

Low genetic diversity was observed among 2011 Ugandan NDV strains with Kimura distances ranging from 0.0 to 2.6% and from 0.0 to 3.5% for the F and HN genes, respectively; but also among known Ugandan NDV strains (virus sequences available from 2001 and 2011 only) with Kimura distances (on partial genes sequences) ranging from 1.5 to 2.6% (comparison between our 2011 sequences and the partial F gene sequence of NDV/chicken/Pallisa/0405/2001) and from 1.6 to 4.1% (comparison between our 2011 sequences and the partial HN gene sequence of 15 partial Ugandan 2001 NDV sequences) for the F and HN genes, respectively.

Our study isolated from apparently health poultry in live bird markets ND viruses that were velogenic in eggs and chickens and harbored polybasic F-protein cleavage site 112RRQKR’F117 amino acids. This was further confirmed by the ICPI which revealed that all the isolates for which ICPI was done had values close to 2.0 (1.60-1.86) with only one isolate (NDV/chicken/Uganda/MU013/2011) with a value of 0.35. The high MDT value and the cleavage site motif of NDV/chicken/Uganda/MU013/2011 however indicated that it was also virulent. Although fairly accurate and sensitive there could be some possible differences in ICPI results related to the execution or final dose that reaches the target site as previously described [13]. The variations in virulence of ND viruses are well known and although the use of MDT provides well defined cut-off values for classification for grouping the viruses into lentogenic, mesogenic and velogenic strains, it has been indicated to be imprecise and unreliable and OIE recommends use of ICPI indices above 0.7 by international agreement for purposes of ND outbreak notification [5].

Traditionally, non-commercial poultry farmers have recognized that introduction of birds from live bird markets was followed by Newcastle disease outbreaks. It is only recently that virological studies showing that healthy-looking birds in live bird markets carry virulent ND viruses have come through to confirm this long known belief [14, 15]. While more and more genetic studies of Newcastle disease are coming out from Africa, many of them have been limited in number of isolates, extent of the sequences analysed, regional as well in-country representation.

A little more studies and genetic analysis of isolates from West Africa have been done. Diverse genotypes of NDV were reported in these studies [11, 1419] complementing other studies in the rest of the world. In addition, genetic diversity at the aa level observed among Western African viruses by Snoeck et al. [11, 15] is much higher than what we observed in Uganda. More precisely, when we calculated the Kimura distance (at the nt level) for available complete F gene sequences from Nigeria for example (country in West Africa with most NDV sequence information) within a single genotype it ranged between 0 and 4.6% for genotype XIVa (strains from 2007 to 2011 n = 15; 0 to 4.6% for 2009 strains alone, n = 12) and between 0 and 5.8% for genotype XVIIa (strains from 2006 to 2011 n = 38; 0.1 to 5.0% for 2009 strains alone, n = 21). This difference could be because (i) there are very few isolates from East Africa that have been examined at the genetic level [10, 20, 21] and for most of them only partial sequences at the cleavage site of the fusion gene were examined but also because (ii) Nigeria is a much bigger country than Uganda, with more complex poultry trade with neighbors but also international trade. The Kimura distance we observed in Uganda was indeed <2.5% for the F gene between 2001 and 2011.

Until recently most of the classification of these viruses was based on the F-protein cleavage site partial sequences and their restriction analysis [3] but this method harbored inconsistencies for example in the evolutionary distances between genotypes and subgenotypes [20]. In the present study we used the new classification system proposed by Diel et al. [7] for nomenclature and classification of the class II ND viruses to classify our viruses and compare them with other East Africa strains with full F gene sequence available in GenBank. Our study confirmed the benefit of using this new classification system for NDV strains but at the same time highlighted some differences in the different genotyping criteria; specifically the distance estimates percentages and tree topology. In our current analysis, while most of the East African NDV strains have a sufficient distance estimate from the other genotype V strains to form a new genotype, the tree topology analysis does not differentiate them into a different genotype but rather groups them among genotype V viruses (Figure 2). This highlights the importance of both distance estimates and tree topology for NDV genotyping and suggests that criteria used for genotyping may need to be updated in the future.

The Ugandan viruses from our study clustered in genotype V with most other NDV sequences from Kenya and Tanzania that were available in GenBank for analysis. Interestingly, there was very limited diversity among our isolates, all of them clustering in genotype V. Our strains also differed from the genotype Ia strains identified in Tanzania (previously classified as lineage 1a) [20], genotype II strains identified in Tanzania and Ethiopia (previously classified as lineage 2) [20, 22], genotype IV strain identified in Sudan (previously classified as lineage 3b) [23], genotype XIII isolates from Burundi and Tanzania (previously classified as genotype VIIb or lineage 5b) [16, 20], genotype VIf strains from Tanzania and Sudan [20, 23], genotype VI isolates from Ethiopia (as determined by the phylogeny carried out in the present study), and genotype VIId isolates from Sudan and Ethiopia [22, 23] as well as South Africa strains [24] (previously classified as genotype VIId). The most common virulent genotypes known to cause disease across the world belonged to genotypes V, VI, VII and VIII [25]. Genotype V in which our isolates fall is said to have been most commonly isolated from Central and North America and only three subgenotypes (Va, Vb and Vc) have been described in the new classification while the most common West Africa strains belong to genotypes XIV, XVII and XVIII [11]. Our isolates did not cluster with the three subgenotypes according to the criteria proposed by Diel et al. [7], suggesting that they belonged to a new subgenotype which we have named subgenotype Vd.

The similarity or clustering of our isolates from the present study and some of the Kenyan and Tanzanian isolates might suggest cross border mixing of strains, which may occur through uncontrolled cross border trade of live birds carrying an endemic strain evolving within the Uganda-Kenya-Tanzania region. This would explain the difference between our isolates and the Sudan and Burundi strains which are different, suggesting limited mixing of the strains. The long time insurgency in Northern Uganda and South Sudan did not allow free trade along these borders and could explain this observation. While the difference with West Africa strains is geographically understandable, the limited number of isolates from countries in East Africa and unavailability of full F gene sequences could have limited fair comparison of the strains in the region. There could therefore be more diversity than we could ascribe with the limited strains sequences in GenBank. All our strains were defined by the “112RRQKR*FV118” motif at the cleavage site. These strains with valine at position 118 have been previously classified as lineage 3 [6] and this motif is common among most genotype V and have been reported in Madagascar [21] and other countries. However our isolates differ in this region where Madagascar isolates that had “112RRRR R*FV118” motif at the cleavage sites as compared to ours with RRQKR*FV motif, although all were isolated from apparently healthy non-vaccinated poultry. Previous studies have indicated that isolates with valine at position 118 results accompanied by substitution of the arginine by glutamine at position 114 resulted in reduction of viral replication and pathogenicity of the viruses [26]. Although no evaluation was done of the single I118V substitution without the Q114R substitution in that study, our isolates that contain the RRQKR*FV have been demonstrated to be highly virulent in experimental studies although they were isolated from apparently healthy poultry.

Genetic studies for NDV are not only important for diagnostic and pathogenicity assessment but are also becoming increasingly important in vaccine strain selection and vaccine studies. Reports have alluded to the possible challenges and implications for diagnosis based on genetic differences in the matrix gene supposed to be conserved across most strains and its implications for the current molecular diagnostic tools [16, 25]. More important is the implication for vaccination which is the current best option for controlling the disease. Several studies have demonstrated that while Newcastle disease virus or APMV-1 viruses belong to the same serotype, they have diverse genotypes that evolve independently and may impact vaccination success. It has been demonstrated that vaccination with heterologous vaccines often result in protection but the birds still shed virulent viruses [27].

Neutralizing antibodies against fusion and hemagglutinin-neuraminidase proteins play an important role in protection against infection [28]. Differences in genotype between vaccine and challenge strains does not hamper the ability of vaccines to protect against disease but viral replication and virus shedding still occurs [29]. However experimental studies have shown that vaccination with genotypic homologous vaccines with challenge virus leads to less virus shedding and therefore reduced virus transmission than heterologous vaccines [29]. It was further demonstrated that significant reduction in virus replication and virus shedding with neutralizing antibodies was more efficient with homologous vaccine strains although higher levels of heterologous antibodies could also reduce transmission [27]. Our present study revealed that neutralizing antibody epitopes on the F protein of our Uganda strains and indeed most of the East Africa isolates were similar to the Lasota vaccine strain which is the most commonly used vaccine strain in Africa and were similar to most genotype V strains both from Africa and elsewhere [11]. The substitutions noted in the epitopes on HN protein and other differences in the aa sequence that could differentiate them from the closely related subgenotype Vd Kenyan strains might suggest possible independent evolution of the Ugandan strains.

The fact that we were able to isolate these highly virulent viruses from apparently healthy-looking birds indicates there was virus replication and shedding that could result in virus transmission and could cause outbreaks. This finding has important bearing on the vaccination strains being used in Africa and provides further data to explore genotype matched vaccines as the most effective strategy to controlling Newcastle disease as has been suggested [27, 28]. Indeed a vaccine study was carried out with South African NDV strains and showed cross-protection of birds with heterologous challenge [30] and a recent ND vaccine efficacy study using Lasota vaccine strain against field strains for West Africa demonstrated protection although the birds still shed virulent viruses [14]. This recent report and the present study indicate that healthy-looking birds may be protected from virulent viruses but continue to shed viruses that may cause disease in naïve populations. The mechanisms behind the survival of velogenic virus in protected birds needs further investigation because it forms part of an important solution to breaking the transmission cycle of these viruses and hence definitive control of ND.

Conclusions

The present study represents the first Ugandan countrywide genetic study of Newcastle disease viruses demonstrating that highly virulent viruses are replicating and being shed by apparently healthy poultry in live bird markets. They potentially pose a serious risk for outbreaks in the naïve non-commercial poultry populations. It also provides evidence of a new subgenotype Vd of low genetic diversity that is circulating in Uganda, Kenya and Tanzania with implications for the control strategies across the porous borders. While the neutralizing epitopes in these strains showed similarity with the Lasota vaccine strain commonly used for vaccination in the region, the evidence of the replication and shedding of the virulent viruses in apparently healthy birds requires more research. Vaccine strains that could significantly reduce replication and shedding of live virulent viruses would be beneficial.

Methods

Sample collection

Tracheal and cloacal swabs were collected from domestic birds from live bird markets in 1500 μl vials of virus transport medium (VTM) across the country with samples collected from representative districts in each region (central, eastern, northern and western) as shown in Figure 1. From each region, districts were randomly selected as follows: central (Masaka, Mukono, and Wakiso), eastern (Abim, Bugiri, Iganga, Kotido, Kumi, Namutumba, and Soroti), northern (Apac, Arua, Gulu, Koboko, Lira, and Nebbi), and western (Kabale, Kabalore, Kasese, and Kisoro). From each of these districts samples were collected from one major live bird market. A total of 1,357 samples were collected with at least 30 samples per selected daily or weekly animal market. The specimens were collected within a 6 months period: from January to June 2011. All samples were transported in a liquid nitrogen dry shipper and stored at −80°C until analyzed.

Virus isolation and identification

Each field sample was inoculated into 9-10-day old embryonated eggs. Egg inoculation, incubation, candling and virus harvesting were conducted in accordance with the OIE Manual of Standards for diagnostic tests and vaccines [5]. Allantoic fluid was harvested from the eggs and ND virus screened for by hemagglutination (HA) assay. The HA positive samples were subjected to hemagglutination inhibition (HI) tests using reference antisera (PMV-1 monoclonal antibodies or antibodies generated in-house in rabbits against Lasota NDV vaccine strain, boosted at weekly intervals) and 0.5% chicken red blood cells for NDV confirmation. The HA and HI assays were carried out by the microtiter methods as previously described [31]. Virus stocks were stored at −70°C until further use.

Newcastle disease virus confirmation by RT-PCR

Viruses were further confirmed by PCR before sequencing. Viral RNA was extracted from all samples by using the QIAamp Viral RNA mini kit (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer’s directions. RT-PCR of the extracts was performed by using a Qiagen One-Step RT-PCR kit according to the manufacturer’s instructions, with the following NDV fusion gene primers FOP1: 5′ TACACCTCATCCCAGACAGGGTC 3′ and FOP2: 5′ AGGCAGGGGAAGTGATTTGTGGC 3′ [32]. The 25-μl reaction volume contained 5 μl of 5x RT-PCR buffer, 11 μl of RNAse-free H20, 1 μl of 10 mmol/L dNTPs, 1.5 μl of 10 μmol/L of each primer, 2 μl of 50 mM MgCl2, 1 μl of enzyme mix (Taq DNA polymerase and reverse transcriptase), and 2 μl of viral RNA extract. Amplification was carried out in an Applied Biosystems Veriti 96-well thermocycler with a single reverse transcription step of 50°C for 30 min, a denaturation of the RT (95°C) for 15 min, followed by forty cycles with 30-sec denaturation at 95°C, 30 sec of primer annealing at 58°C, 1 min of extension at 72°C, and a final extension for 10 min at 72°C. The samples (including a known positive control) were then separated on a 1% agarose gel with a 100-bp marker. The primers amplified a 532-bp segment of the fusion gene in NDV–positive samples; this product was visualized and documented in a Biorad Gel Doc XR imager.

Biological characterization

Biological characterization of the isolates was undertaken to classify the pathotypes of the isolates according to OIE [5]. This included the mean death time (MDT) measured for each isolate in embryonated eggs from a specific-pathogen-free source (Lohmann Tierzucht, Cuxhaven, Germany) inoculated by the allantoic cavity route. The MDT was determined by inoculating a standard dose of 1 × 106 50% egg infectious doses [EID50] into the allantoic cavities of 9- to 11-day-old embryonating specific-pathogen-free eggs. The eggs were incubated at 37°C and candled twice daily (early morning and late afternoon) for 7 days, and the time of embryo mortality was recorded. The MDT for a minimum lethal dose was interpreted as the mean time in hours for the embryo death in the highest dilution at which all eggs died. The isolates were classified as: velogenic viruses if they killed the embryos in fewer than 60 hours; mesogenic if they killed the embryos in 60 to 90 hours; avirulent viruses if they failed to kill the embryos at all. The selected isolates were also tested for virulence in one-day old specific-pathogen-free chicks by intra-cerebral injection of virus. The results were converted into an intra-cerebral pathogenicity index (ICPI) that varied from zero to a maximum of 2.0 for velogenic viruses as described [5]. In addition, the pathotypes were further examined by sequencing of the F0 protein cleavage site motif as described below.

Sequencing of the fusion (F) and hemagglutinin-neuraminidase (HN) genes

A total of 49 representative isolates were selected for sequencing, among which 19 were selected for full F and HN genes sequencing. In addition to the 19 full F and HN sequences, an extra 10 full F and 19 full HN gene sequences were successfully obtained. For the rest of the 65 isolates, only partial sequencing of the cleavage site was done to determine their amino sequence at this site for pathotyping. To amplify full F and HN genes, cDNA was first generated with random hexamers and revert aid H minus reverse transcriptase (Fisher, Illkirch, France) following the instructions of the manufacturer. PCR was carried out for individual gene fragments with primers described in Table 4, using Taq DNA polymerase (Qiagen). The gene fragments were amplified in an Applied Biosystems GeneAmp PCR system 9700 thermocycler with the following touchdown PCR program: 2 minutes at 95°C, 5 cycles with 30s at 95°C, 30s at 58°C, 1 min at 72°C; 30 cycles with 30s at 95°C, 30s at 56°C, 1 min at 72°C; 5 cycles with 30s at 95°C, 30s at 54°C, 1 min at 72°C; and further extension for 10 min at 72°C. The different fragments were run on a 1% gel and purified by gel purification kits (Qiagen). Sanger sequencing method was carried out on all the segments using the same primers as used for the PCR. Sequencing was performed on a 3130XL Applied Biosystems capillary sequencer at the Plateau de Génomique GeT-Purpan, UDEAR UMR 5165 CNRS/UPS, CHU PURPAN, Toulouse, France.
Table 4

Primer sets used for PCR amplification of F and HN genes of Ugandan NDV isolates

Gene

Forward primer (5′ to 3′)

Reverse primer (5′ to 3′)

PCR product (bp)

F

NDVF1F1: GCAAGATGGGCYCCAAACC

NDVF1R2: CATCTTCCCAACTGCCACT

550

 

NDVF2F2: GACCACTTTACTCACTCCTC

NDVF2R1: GTAGGTGGCACGCATATTATT

642

 

NDVF3F2: CGACTCACAGACTCAACTC

NDVF3R2: TATARGTAATRAGRGCRGATG

685

 

NDVF4F2: GCAAGATRACAACATGTAGRTG

NDVF4R2: CTTGGCTAACYGCRCGGTCCAT

709

HN

NDVHN1F2: GGCTTCMCAACATCCGTTCTAC

NDVHN1R2: GAATGYGAGTGATCTCTGCA

652

 

NDVHN2F2: CATGAGYRCTACCCAYTACTG

NDVHN2R2: GATAGATAAGATGGCYTGCTG

591

 

NDVHN3F2: GGGTGGCAAAYTACCCAGGAG

NDVHN3R2: GTATTGGATATTTCRGCAATGC

768

 

NDVHN4F2: GCATACACGACATCGACATG

NDVHN4R2: CGGTARCCCAGTYAATTTCCA

513

1modified from [16].

2modified from [32].

Sequence analysis

The sequences obtained were aligned using Clustal W and edited using Bioedit Software version 5.0.9 [33]. Phylogenetic analysis was performed using the MEGA version 5.05 program [34]. The number of bootstrap replications was set to 500 (for maximum likelihood (ML) analyses) or 1,000 (for Neighbor-Joining (NJ) analyses), and bootstrap values above 50 were labeled on major tree branches for reference. The Ugandan virus strains were clustered on the basis of nucleotides, and only dominant clusters were used to infer phylogenetic relationships. Genotype and subgenotype classification was performed as described by Diel et al., [7]. The analysis included all available full sequences in GenBank or for Figures 2B and 3 all sequences from East Africa in GenBank and the sequence of the reference vaccine strain, Lasota.

Accession numbers

The complete gene sequences of the isolates analyzed in this study were deposited in GenBank with accession numbers [HG937535 to HG937591]. The isolates with identical sequences were not deposited in the GenBank instead they were represented by one sequence and they have been indicated in the phylogenetic tree legends.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Chantal Snoeck, Institute of Immunology, Laboratoire National de Santé, Luxembourg for fruitful discussions on data analysis. The sample collection, virus isolation and part of the sequencing of the isolates were supported by the World Bank Millennium Science Initiative Project (Grant # MSI/03/32/2010) to DKB through the Uganda National Council of Science and Technology. The sequencing of the isolates was supported by the Department of Animal Health, INRA, France, by the “IDEX-nouveaux entrants” program, and by the French Ministry of Agriculture.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
College of Veterinary Medicine, Makerere University
(2)
Uganda National Council of Science and Technology
(3)
National Livestock Resources Research institute
(4)
INRA UMR 1225 IHAP
(5)
INP, ENVT, Université de Toulouse

References

  1. Alexander DJ: Newcastle Disease, Other Paramyxoviruses and Pneumovirus Infections. In Diseases of Poultry. 11th edition. Edited by: Saif YM, Barnes HJ, Glisson JR, Fadly AM, McDougald LR, Swayne DE. Ames: Iowa State University Press; 2003:63-99.Google Scholar
  2. Mukiibi MG: Epidemiology of Newcastle Disease and the Need to Vaccinate Local Chickens in Uganda. In Proceeding no. 39 of the International Workshop, Australia Centre for International Agricultural Research, Newcastle Disease in Village Chickens: Control With Thermostable Oral Vaccines; Canberra, Australia Edited by: Spradbrow PB. 1992, 155-163.Google Scholar
  3. Pedersen JC, Senne DA, Woolcock PR, Kinde H, King DJ, Wise MG, Panigrahy B, Seal BS: Phylogenetic relationships among virulent Newcastle disease virus isolates from the 2002–2003 outbreak in California and other recent outbreaks in North America. J Clin Microbiol 2004, 42: 2329-2334. 10.1128/JCM.42.5.2329-2334.2004PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Otim MO, Kabagambe EK, Mukiibi GM, Christensen H, Bisgaard M: A study of risk factors associated with Newcastle disease epidemics in village free-range chickens in Uganda. Trop Anim Health Prod 2007,39(1):27-35. 10.1007/s11250-006-4441-1PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. OIE: Manual of Diagnostic Tests and Vaccines for Terrestrial Animal. 6th edition. Paris; 2008.Google Scholar
  6. Aldous EW, Mynn JK, Banks J, Alexander DJ: A molecular epidemiological study of avian paramyxovirus type 1 (Newcastle disease virus) isolates by phylogenetic analysis of a partial nucleotide sequence of the fusion protein gene. Avian Pathol 2003,32(3):239-256. 10.1080/030794503100009783PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Diel DG, da Silva LH, Liu H, Wang Z, Miller PJ, Afonso CL: Genetic diversity of avian paramyxovirus type 1: proposal for a unified nomenclature and classification system of Newcastle disease virus genotypes. Infect Genet Evol 2012,12(8):1770-1779. 10.1016/j.meegid.2012.07.012PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Seal BS, Wise MG, Pedersen JC, Senne DA, Alvarez R, Scott MS, King DJ, Yu Q, Kapczynski DR: Genomic sequences of low-virulence avian paramyxovirus-1 (Newcastle disease virus) isolates obtained from live-bird markets in North America not related to commonly utilized commercial vaccine strains. Vet Microbiol 2005, 106: 7-16. 10.1016/j.vetmic.2004.11.013PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Ke MG, Liu JH, Lin YM, Chen HJ, Tsai SS, Chang CP: Molecular characterization of Newcastle disease viruses isolated from recent outbreaks in Taiwan. J Virol Methods 2001, 97: 1-11. 10.1016/S0166-0934(01)00296-8PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Otim MO, Christensen H, Jørgensen PH, Handberg KJ, Bisgaard M: Molecular characterization and phylogenetic study of newcastle disease virus isolates from recent outbreaks in eastern Uganda. J Clin Microbiol 2004,42(6):2802-2805. 10.1128/JCM.42.6.2802-2805.2004PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Snoeck CJ, Owoade AA, Couacy-Hymann E, Alkali BR, Okwen MP, Adeyanju AT, Komoyo GF, Nakouné E, Le Faou A, Muller CP: High genetic diversity of Newcastle disease virus in poultry in West and Central Africa: cocirculation of genotype and newly defined genotypes XVII and XVIII. J Clin Microbiol 2013,51(7):2250-2260. 10.1128/JCM.00684-13PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Iorio RM, Syddal RJ, Sheehan JP, Bratt MA, Glickman RL, Riel AM: Neutralization map of the hemagglutinin-neuraminidase glycoprotein of Newcastle disease virus: domains recognized by monoclonal antibodies that prevent receptor recognition. J Virol 1991,65(9):4999-5006.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Dortmans JC, Koch G, Rottier PJ, Peeters BP: Virulence of Newcastle disease virus: what is known so far? Vet Res 2011, 42: 122. 10.1186/1297-9716-42-122PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Samuel A, Nayak B, Paldurai A, Xiao S, Aplogan GL, Awoume KA, Webby RJ, Ducatez MF, Collins PL, Samal SK: Phylogenetic and pathotypic characterization of Newcastle disease viruses circulating in West Africa and the efficacy of a current vaccine. J Clin Microbiol 2013, 51: 771-781. 10.1128/JCM.02750-12PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Snoeck CJ, Ducatez MF, Owoade AA, Faleke OO, Alkali BR, Tahita MC, Tarnagda Z, Ouedraogo JB, Maikano I, Mbah PO, Kremer JR, Muller CP: Newcastle disease virus in West Africa: new virulent strains identified in noncommercial farms. Arch Virol 2009, 154: 47-54. 10.1007/s00705-008-0269-5PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Cattoli G, Fusaro A, Monne I, Molia S, Le Menach A, Maregeya B, Nchare A, Bangana I, Maina AG, Koffi JN, Thiam H, Bezeid OE, Salviato A, Nisi R, Terregino C, Capua I: Emergence of a new genetic lineage of Newcastle disease virus in West and Central Africa–implications for diagnosis and control. Vet Microbiol 2010, 142: 168-176. 10.1016/j.vetmic.2009.09.063PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Kim SH, Nayak S, Paldurai A, Nayak B, Samuel A, Aplogan GL, Awoume KA, Webby RJ, Ducatez MF, Collins PL, Samal SK: Complete genome sequence of a novel Newcastle disease virus strain isolated from a chicken in West Africa. J Virol 2012, 86: 11394-11395. 10.1128/JVI.01922-12PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Solomon P, Abolnik C, Joannis TM, Bisschop S: Virulent Newcastle disease virus in Nigeria: identification of a new clade of sub-lineage 5f from livebird markets. Virus Genes 2012, 44: 98-103. 10.1007/s11262-011-0678-5PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Van Borm S, Obishakin E, Joannis T, Lambrecht B, van den Berg T: Further evidence for the widespread co-circulation of lineages 4b and 7 velogenic Newcastle disease viruses in rural Nigeria. Avian Pathol 2012, 41: 377-382. 10.1080/03079457.2012.696311PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Yongolo MG, Christensen H, Handberg K, Minga U, Olsen JE: On the origin and diversity of Newcastle disease virus in Tanzania. Onderstepoort J Vet Res 2011,78(1):312.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. de Almeida RS, Hammoumi S, Gil P, Briand FX, Molia S, Gaidet N, Cappelle J, Chevalier V, Balança G, Traoré A, Grillet C, Maminiaina OF, Guendouz S, Dakouo M, Samaké K, Bezeid Oel M, Diarra A, Chaka H, Goutard F, Thompson P, Martinez D, Jestin V, Albina E: New avian paramyxoviruses type I strains identified in Africa provide new outcomes for phylogeny reconstruction and genotype classification. PLoS One 2013,8(10):e76413. 10.1371/journal.pone.0076413PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Fentie T, Heidari A, Aiello R, Kassa T, Capua I, Cattoli G, Sahle M: Molecular characterization of Newcastle disease viruses isolated from rural chicken in northwest Ethiopia reveals the circulation of three distinct genotypes in the country. Trop Anim Health Prod 2014,46(2):299-304. 10.1007/s11250-013-0487-zPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Hassan W, Khair SA, Mochotlhoane B, Abolnik C: Newcastle disease outbreaks in the Sudan from 2003 to 2006 were caused by viruses of genotype 5d. Virus Genes 2010,40(1):106-110. 10.1007/s11262-009-0424-4PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Abolnik C, Horner RF, Bisschop SP, Parker ME, Romito M, Viljoen GJ: A phylogenetic study of South African Newcastle disease virus strains isolated between 1990 and 2002 suggests epidemiological origins in the Far East. Arch Virol 2004, 149: 603-619. 10.1007/s00705-003-0218-2PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Miller PJ, Decanini EL, Afonso CL: Newcastle disease: evolution of genotypes and the related diagnostic challenges. Infect Genet Evol 2010,10(1):26-35. 10.1016/j.meegid.2009.09.012PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Samal S, Kumar S, Khattar SK, Samal SK: A single amino acid change, Q114R, in the cleavage-site sequence of Newcastle disease virus fusion protein attenuates viral replication and pathogenicity. J Gen Virol 2011, 92: 2333-2338. 10.1099/vir.0.033399-0PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Hu S, Ma H, Wu Y, Liu W, Wang X, Liu Y, Liu X: A vaccine candidate of attenuat ed genotype VII Newcastle disease virus generated by reverse genetics. Vaccine 2009,27(6):904-910. 10.1016/j.vaccine.2008.11.091PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Kim SH, Wanasen N, Paldurai A, Xiao S, Collins PL, Samal SK: Newcastle disease virus fusion protein is the major contributor to protective immunity of genotype-matched vaccine. PLoS One 2013,8(8):e74022. 10.1371/journal.pone.0074022PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Miller PJ, Afonso CL, El Attrache J, Dorsey KM, Courtney SC, Guo Z, Kapczynski DR: Effec ts of Ne wcastle disease virus vaccine antibodies on the shedding and tran smission of challenge viruses. Dev Comp Immunol 2013,41(4):505-513. 10.1016/j.dci.2013.06.007PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Bwala DG, Abolnik C, van Wyk A, Cornelius E, Bisschop SP: Efficacy of a genotype 2 Newcastle disease vaccine (Avinew) against challenge with highly virulent genotypes 5d and 3d. J S Afr Vet Assoc 2009,80(3):174-178.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Allan WH, Gough RE: A standard haemagglutination inhibition test for Newcastle disease. Vet Rec 1974, 95: 147-149. 10.1136/vr.95.7.147PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Kho CL, Mohd-Azmi ML, Arshad SS, Yusoff K: Performance of an RT-nested PCR ELISA for detection of Newcastle disease virus. J Virol Methods 2000,86(1):71-83. 10.1016/S0166-0934(99)00185-8PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Hall TA: BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symp Ser 1999, 41: 95-98.Google Scholar
  34. Tamura KPD, Peterson N, Stecher G, Nei M, Kumar S: MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol Biol Evol 2011, 28: 2731-2739. 10.1093/molbev/msr121PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Byarugaba et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Advertisement