Open Access

Decreased antigenicity profiles of immune-escaped and drug-resistant hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) double mutants

Contributed equally
Virology Journal201310:292

https://doi.org/10.1186/1743-422X-10-292

Received: 29 March 2013

Accepted: 17 September 2013

Published: 22 September 2013

Abstract

Background

Selective pressure from either the immune response or the use of nucleoside analogs in antiviral therapy could be driving the emergence of HBV mutants. Because of the overlap of the open reading frame (ORF) S for the HBsAg and ORF P for viral polymerase, rtM204I and rtM204V mutations in the polymerase would produce sI195M and sW196S in the HBsAg. The combined effects of immune-escaped mutations (sT118M, sG145K, sG145R) and drug-resistant mutations (rtM204I, rtM204V) on the antigenicity profiles of HBsAg has not been widely explored.

Methods

To determine the combined effects of immune-escaped and drug-resistant mutants on the antigenicity profiles of HBsAg, recombinant plasmids encoding HBsAg double mutants were constructed using site-directed mutagenesis. The supernatant from each plasmid transfection was analyzed for HBsAg in the western-blotting and five of the most commonly used commercial ELISA kits in China.

Results

Western-blotting assay showed the successful expression of each HBsAg mutant. All five ELISA kits manifested similar avidity, which were demonstrated by the slope of the curves, for the sT118M mutant, and sT118M-rtM204I (sT118M-sI195M) and sT118M-rtM204V (sT118M-sW196S) double mutants, suggesting that drug-resistant YMDD mutants caused negligible losses in the antigenicity of immune-escaped sT118M HBsAg. In contrast, the presence of the rtM204I (sI195M) mutation, but not rtM204V (sW196S) in combination with the sG145K mutation significantly reduced the avidity of sG145K HBsAg. The rtM204I (sI195M) mutation also decreased the antigenicity profiles for sG145R HBsAg.

Conclusions

Drug-resistant mutations rtM204I (sI195M) and rtM204V (sW196S) caused significant reduction in antigenicity for the immune-escaped HBsAg mutants sG145K and sG145R, which may hamper HBV diagnosis and disease control from HBV blood-transfusion transmissions in China. The development of ELISA kits with a greater sensitivity for drug-resistant and immune-escaped HBsAg warrants further consideration.

Keywords

HBVHBsAgMutationAntigenicityELISA

Introduction

The implementation of the Hepatitis B Immunization program in China resulted in a decrease in the incidence of HBV infections, from approximately 10% to 7% in the general population [1]. However, hepatitis B still remains endemic in China and other parts of Asia [2, 3]. Blood screening strategies used in other developed countries with a reported low incidence of HBV infection include HBsAg and anti-HBc screening, and in some instances nucleic acid testing (NAT) [46]; whilst China relies almost solely on HBsAg serologic screening [7, 8]. HBsAg mutations may give rise to changes in HBsAg antigenicity, resulting in reduced sensitivity and detection capability of current diagnostic tests, and which might present a challenge for HBsAg screening and HBV diagnosis, and ultimately increase the risk of transfusion-transmission of HBV infection [710].

In the absence of a proof-reading function, HBV reverse transcriptase randomly misincorporates bases into the replicating DNA strand, generating a quasispecies pool with a large number of variants [11]. Meanwhile, selection pressure from the specific immune response, whether from the passive application of hyperimmune globulin (HBIG) prophylaxis [12] or from active HBsAg vaccination [13, 14], could drive the emergence of HBsAg mutant viruses. An amino acid change from glycine to arginine at position 145 (sG145R) for the immunodominant determinant of HBsAg, which alone can be responsible for vaccine escape, is most commonly reported and has been well documented [7, 15]. A glycine to lysine point mutation at position 145 (sG145K) or a threonine to methionine substitution at position 118 (sT118M) has also been detected, and both mutations have been reported to significantly change the antigenic profile of HBsAg compared with that of wild type [7, 1618].

HBV mutants could also evolve because of selective pressure from nucleoside analog treatments. Lamivudine was the first approved oral nucleoside analogue for the treatment of chronic HBV infection, suppressing HBV replication by interfering with HBV DNA polymerase [1921]. The substitution of methionine by isoleucine (I) or valine (V) in the tyrosine-methionine-aspartate-aspartate (YMDD) motif (C domain) at position 204 (rtM204I or rtM204V) has been shown to confer lamivudine resistance on HBV [2224]. Interestingly, because of the overlap of the open reading frame (ORF) S for the HBsAg and ORF P for viral polymerase, rtM204I and rtM204V mutations produce sI195M and sW196S in the HBsAg [25, 26]. Consequently, the YMDD mutation can occur naturally in chronic HBV infections in the absence of previous exposure to lamivudine treatment [27, 28], highlighting the overlap of selective pressure between the immune response and drug treatment.

The double mutations may develop if the chronic HBV patients, who have been infected with immune-escaped mutant, receive anti-virus therapy or even in the absence of previous exposure to lamivudine treatment. Immune-escaped and drug-resistant mutants may also occur in some patients, who have been infected with drug-resistant mutants but been false negative in the HBsAg screening for the reduced antigenicity of the mutant S protein and receive hyperimmune globulin prophylaxis or HBsAg vaccination. Although substitutions outside of the ‘a’ determinant appear to be readily detected by current commercially available HBsAg immunoassays, there is limited information as to the combined effects of immune-escaped (T118M, G145K, G145R) and drug-resistant (rtM204I = sI195M, rtM204V = sW196S) point mutations on the antigenicity profiles of HBsAg. In the present study, we produced HBsAg double mutants (immune-escaped and drug-resistant) using site-directed mutagenesis and analyzed their binding capability using five commercially available ELISA kits in China.

Results

Expression of HBsAg mutants

To examine whether HBsAg mutants could express properly, 293 T cells were transfected transiently with each HBsAg mutant clone. With the wild-type HBsAg clone as the positive control and a mock DNA vector as the negative control, the expression of HBsAg mutants in 293 T cells was examined by Western blotting assay using monoclonal antibody H166, which recognized the amino acid 121–124 loop of HBsAg as a continuous epitope. These results indicated that 293 T cells transfected with either wild-type or HBsAg mutants had very comparable levels of HBsAg production (Figure 1). Since SDS denatured all proteins into linear shape, the overall antigenicity of proteins, including the configuration epitopes and linear epitopes, could not be loyally proved in the Western-blotting assay. Different from Western-blotting, ELISA is usually done to detect antigens in their native state, which reflects the antigenicity better.
Figure 1

Western blot analysis of the HBsAg expressed by wild type and mutant clones , plus empty vector as a negative control. Transfected 293 T cell supernatant samples (10 μl/sample) were loaded to each lane in SDS-PAGE. HBsAg specific monoclonal antibody H166 was used as the detection antibody at 1:1000 dilution. 1: wild type; 2: sT118M; 3: sT118M-rtM204I; 4: sT118M-rtM204V; 5: sG145K; 6: sG145K-rtM204I; 7: sG145K-rtM204V; 8: sG145R; 9: sG145R- rtM204I; 10: sG145R- rtM204V; 11: empty vector.

Negligible decline in the antigenicity of sT118M-rtM204I or sT118M-rtM204V mutant

Of the five commercial HBsAg ELISA kits used in this study, four kits (LZ, WT, GBT, and BN) recognized the sT118M immune-escaped mutant and recombinant sT118M-rtM204I (sT118M-sI195M) mutant, yielding similar titration curves, and indicating that rtM204I may contribute marginally to the antigenicity of sT118M HBsAg. Similarly, the differences in avidity (as determined by the slope of the curve) was indistinguishable between the sT118M mutant and sT118M-rtM204V (sT118M- sW196S) mutant for all five assays, suggesting that drug-resistant YMDD mutants caused a negligible loss in antigenicity for immune-escaped sT118M HBsAg (Figure 2).
Figure 2

The supernatants from each plasmid transfection were analyzed for HBsAg using five ELISA kits. (A) Zhu Hai LivZon Diagnostic INC (LZ); (B) Beijing WanTai Biological Pharmacy Enterprise Limited Company (WT); (C) Beijing Big-GBI Biotech Limited Company (GBI); (D) Beijing BioNeovan Limited Company (BN); and (E) Shenzhen Kang Sheng Bao Bio-Technology Limited Company (KSB). With the exception of ELISA kit KSB, which recognized sT118M-rtM204I (sT118M-sI195M) with reduced avidity, all of the kits had almost invariable slope or avidity to the sT118M mutant, sT118M-rtM204I (sT118M-sI195M), and sT118M-rtM204V (sT118M-sW196S) double mutant. *, p < 0.05, compared with sT118M HBsAg.

Significant reduction in the antigenicity of sG145K-rtM204I HBsAg mutant

As with the recently identified T118M mutation in the ‘a’ determinant of HBsAg [7], the occurrence of sG145K or sG145R mutants are well reported [1618], and they therefore may have a more significant role in infection diagnosis. With the rtM204I (sI195M) mutation on the backbone of the immune escape mutant sG145K, avidity was reduced significantly for four of the ELISA kits. The exception was with the GBI ELISA kit. These results suggest that unlike sT118M HBsAg, rtM204I (sI195M) may cause a considerable reduction in the antigenicity of sG145K mutant HBsAg. However, the rtM204V (sW196S) mutation, failed to cause a reduction in avidity in the five ELISA kits tested (Figure 3).
Figure 3

The supernatants from each plasmid transfection were analyzed for HBsAg using five ELISA kits. (A) Zhu Hai LivZon Diagnostic INC (LZ); (B) Beijing WanTai Biological Pharmacy Enterprise Limited Company (WT); (C) Beijing Big-GBI Biotech Limited Company (GBI); (D) Beijing BioNeovan Limited Company (BN); and (E) Shenzhen Kang Sheng Bao Bio-Technology Limited Company (KSB). With the rtM204I (sI195M) mutation in the backbone of sG145K, avidity was reduced significantly in four kits. The exception was with ELISA kit GBI. rtM204V (sW196S) mutation did not cause antigenic variation of sG145K HBsAg. *, p < 0.05, compared with sG145K HBsAg.

Decrease in the antigenicity of sG145R-rtM204I/V HBsAg mutant

The antigenicity profile also decreased for sG145R HBsAg when coupled with mutation rtM204I (sI195M) for all of the ELISA kits. Interestingly, rtM204V (sW196S) mutation also decreased the antigenicity of sG145R HBsAg but only for the WT and BN ELISA kits (Figure 4).
Figure 4

The supernatants from each plasmid transfection were analyzed for HBsAg using five ELISA kits. (A) Zhu Hai LivZon Diagnostic INC (LZ); (B) Beijing WanTai Biological Pharmacy Enterprise Limited Company (WT); (C) Beijing Big-GBI Biotech Limited Company (GBI); (D) Beijing BioNeovan Limited Company (BN); and (E) Shenzhen Kang Sheng Bao Bio-Technology Limited Company (KSB). With the rtM204I (sI195M) mutation in the backbone of sG145R, avidity was reduced significantly for all ELISA kits. rtM204V (sW196S) mutation also reduced the recognition of sG145R HBsAg in ELISA kits WT and BN. *, p < 0.05, compared with sG145R HBsAg.

Discussion

Currently, there are three lines of defense for HBsAg screening in transfusion centers across China. The first line of defense is the fast colloidal gold assay, which is performed prior to blood donation. Two rounds of screening using the more sensitive ELISA, using two commercially available kits from different companies, constitutes the two latter lines of defense [7]. Despite the current screening practices, post-blood transfusion HBV infection still persists [29, 30], most probably due to the serologically negative window period (more so during the late stages of infection) [31], or through treatment [26]; all of which highlight the need for HBcAb screening and NAT in China. Unfortunately, HBcAb screening is hampered by the high prevalence of HBV infection in China. Although nationwide implementation of triplex-individual-donation-NAT testing for HBV DNA would detect an additional 9964 viremic donations per year in China [32], NAT is procedurally cumbersome and incurs high costs, and is therefore more suitable for developed countries with a low prevalence of HBV infection [33]. As HBsAg screening is fundamentally the only strategy which can be used to reduce post-transfusion HBV infection in China, the antigenicity of HBsAg, especially to mutants, should be explored further.

HBsAg mutants can evolve from either selective pressure from the immune response or through nucleoside analog treatments [34]. Although the 'a'-determinant region of HBsAg was usually unaffected by lamivudine therapy [35], mutations of amino acids outside the 'a'-determinant region could alter the antigenicity of HBsAg, especially considering their roles on the conformational changes of HBsAg. The unique gene structure of HBV dictates that variation within the shared coding region for HBsAg and virus polymerase may have an indirect affect on the other. This was demonstrated with the mutation sW196S in HBsAg, which was associated with reduced binding to anti-HBs antibody, and corresponding to rtM204I in polymerase and conferring resistance to lamivudine [36].

Regarding the co-existence of immune-escaped mutants and drug-resistant mutants, it is plausible to investigate their combined influence on the antigenicity of HBsAg. The immune escape mutant sT118M HBsAg can decrease the antigenicity of HBsAg considerably [37]. In the current study no changes to the antigenicity of sT118M HBsAg was observed when the drug-resistant mutants rtM204I (sI195M) or rtM204V (sW196S) were present on the sT118M backbone. YMDD mutations, particularly rtM204I (sI195M), reduced the antigenicity of sG145K HBsAg significantly, causing the great drop in the slope of an antibody titration curve in four of the five ELISA kits. The presence of rtM204I (sI195M) on the sG145R HBsAg mutant backbone, also resulted in a loss in avidity of ELISA kits or the antigenicity of HBsAg. Compared with rtM204I (sI195M), the YMDD mutation rtM204V (sW196S) appeared to have minimal influence on the immune-escaped HBsAg mutants. rtM204I (sI195M) significantly reduced the antigenicity of immune-escaped HBsAg, especially for the most common mutants sG145K and sG145R HBsAg. Of great concern is the possibility that escaped HBV mutants which may be not neutralized by antibodies induced by current HBsAg vaccines and unable to be detected using current HBsAg screening protocols, are being transmitted to other vaccinated individuals [26] who are blood donors in China.

Conclusions

Drug-resistant YMDD mutations caused a significant reduction in the antigenicity of immune-escaped HBsAg, particularly for the most common mutant sG145K. The consequences of these results are that a reduction in HBsAg antigenicity may hinder HBsAg diagnosis and consequently increase the risk of HBV blood-transfusion transmission in China. To reduce the transmission of HBV through blood transfusions, HBsAg ELISA kits with greater analytic sensitivity and detection capability for wild type HBsAg and diverse mutants should be developed.

Materials and methods

Construction of plasmids encoding double mutant HBsAg by site-directed mutagenesis

Plasmid pJW4303 incorporating the optimized wild-type HBsAg gene (genotype B) was a gift from China-US Vaccine Research Center [38]. Site-directed mutagenesis of the HBsAg was achieved using the Altered Sites in vitro Mutagenesis Kit (Promega Corporation, Madison, WI.) according to the manufacturer’s instructions, and the primers listed in Table 1. Mutations were verified by sequencing prior to cloning into similarly digested empty parent vector pJW4303 to yield recombinant plasmids; pJW4303-sT118M-rtM204I, pJW4303-sT118M-rtM204V, pJW4303-sG145K-rtM204I, pJW4303-sG145K-rtM204V, pJW4303-sG145R-rtM204I, and pJW4303-sG145R-rtM204V. All recombinant plasmids used in transfection experiments were purified using Qiagen’s plasmid midi kit (Qiagen Inc., Chatsworth, CA.).
Table 1

Primers used for site-directed mutagenesis

Primer

Sequence

T118M-Forward

5’-TCATCAACAACCAGCATG GGACCATGCAAA-3’

T118M-Backward

5’-TTTGCATGGTCCCAT GCTGGTTGTTGATGA-3’

G145K-Forward

5’-AAACCTACGGACAAA AACTGCACCTGT-3’

G145K-Backward

5’-ACAGGTGCAGTTTTT GTCCGTAGGTTT-3’

G145R-Forward

5’-AAACCTACGGACCGA AACTGCACCTGT-3’

G145R-Backward

5’-ACAGGTGCAGTTTCG GTCCGTAGGTTT-3’

rtM204I-Forward

5’-GATCCT GATGATGTGGTACTGGG-3’

rtM204V-Forward

5’-GATGTG GATGATGTGGTACTGGG-3’

rtM204M/I-Backward

5’-ACGGACAGCCACACGGTGGGGCTCA-3’

Table 1 Primers for site-directed mutagenesis.

Transient transfection with the expression plasmids

Human embryonic kidney 293 T cells were maintained in high-glucose DMEM (Gibco) supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum (Hyclone) and 1 X Pen/Strep (Sigma) in 6-well tissue culture plates at 37°C and 5% CO2. Once the cells had reached 60 to 80% confluence they were transfected with recombinant plasmid DNA using PolyFect transfection reagent (Qiagen) according to a previously described method [39]. Briefly, 2 μg plasmid was mixed with 20 μl PolyFect transfection reagent and incubated at room temperature for 5–10 min before addition to 293 T cells. The culture supernatant of transfected cells was collected after 72 h and stored at −70°C until required for the detection of HBsAg.

Western-blotting

To identify the expression of HBsAg construct, the culture supernatant from each HBsAg mutant transfected cells was subjected to SDS-PAGE and blotted onto PVDF membrane. Blocking was done with 0.1% I-Block (Tropix, Bedford, MA). The membrane was incubated with H166 anti-HBs from Abbott at 1:1000 dilution for 1 h and reacted subsequently with AP-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG at 1:5000 dilution for 30 min. Membranes were washed with blocking buffer after each step. Western-light substrate was then applied to the membrane for 5 min. X-ray films were exposed to the membrane and developed by a Kodak processor.

Elisa

The supernatants recovered from each transfection were serially diluted and analyzed for HBsAg using five of the most popular commercial ELISA kits in China; Zhu Hai LivZon Diagnostic INC (LZ), Beijing WanTai Biological Pharmacy Enterprise Limited Company (WT), Beijing Big-GBI Biotech Limited Company (GBI), Beijing BioNeovan Limited Company (BN), and Shenzhen Kang Sheng Bao Bio-Technology Limited Company (KSB). The ability of each of the ELISA to detect immune-escaped mutants (sT118M, sG145R, sG145K) had been confirmed in previous experiments (unpublished data). All assays were performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

Statistical analysis

The slope of each titration curve, which is proportional to the average antibody avidity [4042], was determined and compared for the statistical difference using the Fisher’s exact test.

Ethics statement

Written informed consent was obtained from all study participants. Sera and plasma samples were collected from the study subjects. They were diagnosed with HBV infection. This study was carried out in strict accordance with the requirements for clinical studies established by the Nanjing Medical University, China. The protocol was approved by the Ethics Review Committee from the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University.

Authors’ information

Mingshun Zhang and Guohong Ge: co-first authors.

Notes

Abbreviations

HBV: 

Hepatitis B virus

HBsAg: 

Hepatitis B surface antigen

ELISA: 

Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay

NAT: 

Nucleic acid testing

PCR: 

Polymerase chain reaction

YMDD: 

Tyrosine-methionine-aspartate-aspartate

ORF: 

Open reading frame.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This study was sponsored by the National Natural Science Foundation of China to Dr. Zuhu Huang (No. 81171551/H1904) and University Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Provincial Department of Education to Dr. Mingshun Zhang (11KJB320007).

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Infectious Disease, the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University
(2)
Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Nanjing Medical University
(3)
The Third Hospital of Zhenjiang City
(4)
Nanjing Red Cross Blood Center

References

  1. Wang Y, Jia J: Control of hepatitis B in China: prevention and treatment. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther 2011, 9: 21-25. 10.1586/eri.10.143PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Liu J, Fan D: Hepatitis B in China. Lancet 2007, 369: 1582-1583. 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60723-5PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Luo Z, Xie Y, Deng M, Zhou X, Ruan B: Prevalence of hepatitis B in the southeast of China: a population-based study with a large sample size. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2011, 23: 695-700. 10.1097/MEG.0b013e328347322bPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Seto WK, Lai CL, Yuen MF: Nucleic acid testing for the detection of HBV DNA. Hepat Mon 2011, 11: 847-848. 10.5812/kowsar.1735143X.642PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Stramer SL, Wend U, Candotti D, Foster GA, Hollinger FB, Dodd RY, Allain JP, Gerlich W: Nucleic acid testing to detect HBV infection in blood donors. N Engl J Med 2011, 364: 236-247. 10.1056/NEJMoa1007644PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Stramer SL, Zou S, Notari EP, Foster GA, Krysztof DE, Musavi F, Dodd RY: Blood donation screening for hepatitis B virus markers in the era of nucleic acid testing: are all tests of value? Transfusion 2012, 52: 440-446. 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2011.03283.xPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Yong-Lin Y, Qiang F, Ming-Shun Z, Jie C, Gui-Ming M, Zu-Hu H, Xu-Bing C: Hepatitis B surface antigen variants in voluntary blood donors in Nanjing. China. Virol J 2012, 9: 82. 10.1186/1743-422X-9-82PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Zhang R, Wang L, Li J: Hepatitis B virus transfusion risk in China: proficiency testing for the detection of hepatitis B surface antigen. Transfus Med 2010, 20: 322-328. 10.1111/j.1365-3148.2010.01007.xPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Matsuda C, Moriyama H, Taketani T, Shibata H: Nagai A [One example of false negative hepatitis B surface antigen (EIA) result due to variant S area strain and reagment reactiveness related to hepatitis B surface antigen]. Kansenshogaku Zasshi 2011, 85: 21-25.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Kleinman SH, Busch MP: HBV: amplified and back in the blood safety spotlight. Transfusion 2001, 41: 1081-1085. 10.1046/j.1537-2995.2001.41091081.xPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Ji F, Zhou L, Ma S, Li F, Ding H, Zeng C: Dynamic changes of HBV quasispecies and deletion patterns in a chronic hepatitis B patient. J Med Virol 2009, 81: 1551-1559. 10.1002/jmv.21595PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Shields PL, Owsianka A, Carman WF, Boxall E, Hubscher SG, Shaw J, O'Donnell K, Elias E, Mutimer DJ: Selection of hepatitis B surface "escape" mutants during passive immune prophylaxis following liver transplantation: potential impact of genetic changes on polymerase protein function. Gut 1999, 45: 306-309. 10.1136/gut.45.2.306PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Hsu HY, Chang MH, Ni YH, Chen HL: Survey of hepatitis B surface variant infection in children 15 years after a nationwide vaccination programme in Taiwan. Gut 2004, 53: 1499-1503. 10.1136/gut.2003.034223PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Mathet VL, Cuestas ML, Ruiz V, Minassian ML, Rivero C, Trinks J, Daleoso G, Leon LM, Sala A, Libellara B, Corach D, Oubina JR: Detection of hepatitis B virus (HBV) genotype E carried–even in the presence of high titers of anti-HBs antibodies–by an Argentinean patient of African descent who had received vaccination against HBV. J Clin Microbiol 2006, 44: 3435-3439. 10.1128/JCM.00866-06PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Carman WF: The clinical significance of surface antigen variants of hepatitis B virus. J Viral Hepat 1997, 4: 11-20. 10.1111/j.1365-2893.1997.tb00155.xPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Wagner AA, Denis F, Weinbreck P, Loustaud V, Autofage F, Rogez S, Alain S: Serological pattern 'anti-hepatitis B core alone' in HIV or hepatitis C virus-infected patients is not fully explained by hepatitis B surface antigen mutants. AIDS 2004, 18: 569-571. 10.1097/00002030-200402200-00028PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Verheyen J, Neumann-Fraune M, Berg T, Kaiser R, Obermeier M: The detection of HBsAg mutants expressed in vitro using two different quantitative HBsAg assays. J Clin Virol 2012, 54: 279-281. 10.1016/j.jcv.2012.04.010PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Szmaragd C, Foster GR, Manica A, Bartholomeusz A, Nichols RA, Balloux F: Genome-wide characterisation of hepatitis B mutations involved in clinical outcome. Heredity (Edinb) 2006, 97: 389-397. 10.1038/sj.hdy.6800882View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Liaw YF, Sung JJ, Chow WC, Farrell G, Lee CZ, Yuen H, Tanwandee T, Tao QM, Shue K, Keene ON, Dixon JS, Gray DF, Sabbat J: Lamivudine for patients with chronic hepatitis B and advanced liver disease. N Engl J Med 2004, 351: 1521-1531. 10.1056/NEJMoa033364PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Yeh CT: Development of HBV S gene mutants in chronic hepatitis B patients receiving nucleotide/nucleoside analogue therapy. Antivir Ther 2010, 15: 471-475. 10.3851/IMP1552PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Kim JH, Jung YK, Joo MK, Yim HJ, Park JJ, Kim JS, Bak YT, Yeon JE, Byun KS: Hepatitis B viral surface mutations in patients with adefovir resistant chronic hepatitis B with A181T/V polymerase mutations. J Korean Med Sci 2010, 25: 257-264. 10.3346/jkms.2010.25.2.257PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Sablon E, Shapiro F: Advances in Molecular Diagnosis of HBV Infection and Drug Resistance. Int J Med Sci 2005, 2: 8-16.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Murata M, Furusyo N, Unno M, Ogawa E, Toyoda K, Taniai H, Ohnishi H, Hayashi J: Long-term effects of lamivudine treatment in Japanese chronic hepatitis B patients. World J Gastroenterol 2011, 17: 2945-2952. 10.3748/wjg.v17.i24.2945PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Liu Y, Wang C, Zhong Y, Li X, Dai J, Ren X, Xu Z, Li L, Yao Z, Ji D, Wang L, Zhang L, Wong VW, Zoulim F, Xu D: Genotypic resistance profile of hepatitis B virus (HBV) in a large cohort of nucleos(t)ide analogue-experienced Chinese patients with chronic HBV infection. J Viral Hepat 2011, 18: e29-e39. 10.1111/j.1365-2893.2010.01360.xPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Sheldon J, Ramos B, Garcia-Samaniego J, Rios P, Bartholomeusz A, Romero M, Locarnini S, Zoulim F, Soriano V: Selection of hepatitis B virus (HBV) vaccine escape mutants in HBV-infected and HBV/HIV-coinfected patients failing antiretroviral drugs with anti-HBV activity. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2007, 46: 279-282. 10.1097/QAI.0b013e318154bd89PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Hsu CW, Yeh CT, Chang ML, Liaw YF: Identification of a hepatitis B virus S gene mutant in lamivudine-treated patients experiencing HBsAg seroclearance. Gastroenterology 2007, 132: 543-550. 10.1053/j.gastro.2006.12.001PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Tan Y, Ding K, Su J, Trinh X, Peng Z, Gong Y, Chen L, Cui Q, Lei N, Chen X, Yu R: The naturally occurring YMDD mutation among patients chronically infected HBV and untreated with lamivudine: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 2012, 7: e32789. 10.1371/journal.pone.0032789PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Sayan M, Senturk O, Akhan SC, Hulagu S, Cekmen MB: Monitoring of hepatitis B virus surface antigen escape mutations and concomitantly nucleos(t)ide analog resistance mutations in Turkish patients with chronic hepatitis B. Int J Infect Dis 2010, 14: e136-e141.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Yao GB: Importance of perinatal versus horizontal transmission of hepatitis B virus infection in China. Gut 1996, 38: S39-S42. 10.1136/gut.38.Suppl_2.S39PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Shang G, Seed CR, Wang F, Nie D, Farrugia A: Residual risk of transfusion-transmitted viral infections in Shenzhen, China, 2001 through 2004. Transfusion 2007, 47: 529-539. 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2006.01146.xPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Allain JP: Occult hepatitis B virus infection: implications in transfusion. Vox Sang 2004, 86: 83-91. 10.1111/j.0042-9007.2004.00406.xPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Ren FR, Wang JX, Huang Y, Yao FZ, Lv YL, Li JL, Wen GX, Wen XQ, Liu J, Dong XD, Ma HL, Zhou ZM, Bi XH, Tu L, King M, Nelson K, Ness P, Shan H: Hepatitis B virus nucleic acid testing in Chinese blood donors with normal and elevated alanine aminotransferase. Transfusion 2011, 51: 2588-2595. 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2011.03215.xPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Fischinger JM, Stephan B, Wasserscheid K, Eichler H, Gartner BC: A cost-benefit analysis of blood donor vaccination as an alternative to additional DNA testing for reducing transfusion transmission of hepatitis B virus. Vaccine 2010, 28: 7797-7802. 10.1016/j.vaccine.2010.09.037PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Coleman PF: Detecting hepatitis B surface antigen mutants. Emerg Infect Dis 2006, 12: 198-203. 10.3201/eid1203.050038PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Schildgen V, Ziegler S, Tillmann RL, Schildgen O: Novel mutation in YMDD motif and direct neighbourhood in a child with chronic HBV-infection and clinical lamivudine and adefovir resistance - a scholarly case. Virol J 2010, 7: 167. 10.1186/1743-422X-7-167PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Torresi J: The virological and clinical significance of mutations in the overlapping envelope and polymerase genes of hepatitis B virus. J Clin Virol 2002, 25: 97-106.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Yang Yonglin MB, Ma Guim I, Zhao J, Huang Z: Effect of HBsAg muta tion a t aa118 position on the HBsAg blood screen ing test. Chin J Blood Transfusion 2009, 22: 806-809.Google Scholar
  38. Ge G, Wang S, Han Y, Zhang C, Lu S, Huang Z: Removing N-terminal sequences in pre-s1 domain enhanced antibody and B-cell responses by an HBV large surface antigen DNA vaccine. PLoS One 2012, 7: e41573. 10.1371/journal.pone.0041573PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Bai J, Sui J, Zhu RY, Tallarico AS, Gennari F, Zhang D, Marasco WA: Inhibition of Tat-mediated transactivation and HIV-1 replication by human anti-hCyclinT1 intrabodies. J Biol Chem 2003, 278: 1433-1442. 10.1074/jbc.M208297200PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Sparks K, Ballow M: The indirect ELISA for quantitation of specific antibody: analysis of antibody dilution curves. Diagn Immunol 1983, 1: 269-275.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Kawade Y, Finter N, Grossberg SE: Neutralization of the biological activity of cytokines and other protein effectors by antibody: theoretical formulation of antibody titration curves in relation to antibody affinity. J Immunol Methods 2003, 278: 127-144. 10.1016/S0022-1759(03)00203-5PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Barrette RW, Urbonas J, Silbart LK: Quantifying specific antibody concentrations by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay using slope correction. Clin Vaccine Immunol 2006, 13: 802-805. PMCID: 1489577 10.1128/CVI.00422-05PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Zhang et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.