Skip to main content
Download PDF

Application of a VP4/VP2-inferred transmission clusters in estimating the impact of interventions on rhinovirus transmission

Virology Journal volume 19, Article number: 36 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Despite the clinical burden attributable to rhinovirus (RV) infections, the RV transmission dynamics and the impact of interventions on viral transmission remain elusive.

Methods

A total of 3,935 nasopharyngeal specimens were examined, from which the VP4/VP2 gene was sequenced and genotyped. RV transmission clusters were reconstructed using the genetic threshold of 0.005 substitutions/site, estimated from the global VP4/VP2 sequences. A transmission cluster is characterized by the presence of at least two individuals (represent by nodes), whose viral sequences are genetically linked (represent by undirected edges) at the estimated genetic distance threshold supported by bootstrap value of ≥ 90%. To assess the impact of facemask, pleconaril and social distancing on RV transmission clusters, trials were simulated for interventions with varying efficacy and were evaluated based on the reduction in the number of infected patients (nodes) and the reduction in the number of nodes-connecting edges. The putative impact of intervention strategies on RV transmission clusters was evaluated through 10,000 simulations.

Results

A substantial clustering of 168 RV transmission clusters of varying sizes were observed. This suggests that RV disease burden observed in the population was largely due to multiple sub-epidemics, predominantly driven by RV-A, followed by RV-C and -B. No misclassification of RV species and types were observed, suggesting the specificity and sensitivity of the analysis. Through 10,000 simulations, it was shown that social distancing may be effective in decelerating RV transmission, by removing more than 95% of nodes and edges within the RV transmission clusters. However, facemask removed less than 8% and 66% of nodes and edges, respectively, conferring moderate advantage in limiting RV transmission.

Conclusion

Here, we presented a network-based approach of which the degree of RV spread that fuel disease transmission in the region was mapped for the first time. The utilization of RV transmission clusters in assessing the putative impact of interventions on disease transmission at the population level was demonstrated.

Background

Rhinoviruses (RVs), the primary viral etiology of acute respiratory tract infections, continue to contribute significantly to global health burden through increased medical expenses and loss of productivity [1]. While studies have reported that infectious diseases such as influenza, varicella, herpes zoster, rubella and measles are suppressed [2,3,4], RV infections remains common during the relentless fight against the unceasing coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) [5]. On average, RV causes 2–4 episodes of respiratory infections in adults and 8–12 episodes in children each year [6]. More importantly, reports have highlighted the involvement of RV in lower respiratory tract infections [7, 8]. Furthermore, several studies have demonstrated that individuals with underlying respiratory conditions may experience severe RV-induced complications, as observed in the exacerbation of asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and cystic fibrosis [9,10,11].

Despite its disease burden, factors that drive the virus transmission remain unclear. Investigation based on viral sequence data have unraveled the potential role of transmission clusters in fueling the disease expansion [12]. For instance, in a spatial analysis on the Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) outbreaks, it has been demonstrated that the persistence of MERS-CoV infection was established through the presence of transmission clusters [13]. Likewise, such finding was observed in other viral infection such as the 2019 Ebola virus outbreaks [14]. Although RV is commonly associated with respiratory tract infections, the transmission pattern of RV remains insufficiently explored. Importantly, the risk of continual emergence of transmission clusters in the absence of effective interventions may result in expanded and sustained viral transmission, as observed in the current COVID-19 pandemic [15].

Treatment of RV infection remains supportive and non-specific, with no licensed vaccine or approved antiviral therapy available [16]. The challenge may be compounded by the presence of three confirmed RV and a provisional fourth RV species [17] that diverged further into more than 160 genetically distinct types with extensive sequence variability at the antigenic sites [18, 19]. Although non-pharmaceutical interventions (e.g., social distancing and facemask) are available to mitigate disease expansion [20, 21], the effectiveness of such interventions in controlling viral transmission in the population is difficult to measure and remains elusive. To date, the putative impact of interventions on viral transmission has only been inferred for the human immunodeficiency virus using a network-based analysis [22].

Here, based on the viral genetic diversity, we investigated the dynamics of RV transmission clusters in a population from individual VP4/VP2 gene, followed by simulation of the impact of intervention strategies on RV infections at the population level. Importantly, the integration of the proof-of-concept analysis into conventional molecular epidemiological surveillance may enable a near real-time investigation on virus spread and control.

Methods

Ethics statement, study subjects and specimens

This study was approved by the University Malaya Medical Centre Medical Ethics Committee (MEC890.1). Standard, multilingual consent forms validated by the Medical Ethics Committee were used. Written informed consent was obtained from all study subjects. All experiments were performed in accordance with approved guidelines and regulations. Consenting outpatients who presented with symptoms of acute upper respiratory tract infections were enrolled at the primary care clinics, University Malaya Medical Centre, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia between February 2012 and May 2014. Respiratory specimens in the form of nasopharyngeal swabs were collected in universal transport medium using standardized method. The specimens were transported to the laboratory and stored at − 80 °C before further processing.

Molecular detection of RV

Total viral nucleic acid was extracted from nasopharyngeal specimens using the NucliSENS easyMAG automated nucleic acid extraction system (bioMérieux, Marcy I'Etoile, France), as described in the manufacturer's protocol. The specimens were screened for viral pathogens using the xTAG Respiratory Viral Panel (RVP) FAST Assay (Luminex Molecular, Toronto, Canada) and analysed using the Luminex’s proprietary Universal Tag sorting system on the Luminex 200 IS platform (Luminex Corp, Texas, USA). Specimens positive for human enteroviruses were further confirmed through PCR amplification and direct sequencing of the VP4/VP2 gene using primers described previously [23]. The contiguous nucleotide sequences generated by an ABI Prism 3730xl DNA analyzer (Applied Biosystems, USA) were assembled and codon aligned.

To determine the types of these circulating RV, neighbour-joining trees were first reconstructed based on an updated and comprehensive list of global VP4/VP2 sequence data (n = 3,397), retrieved from GenBank (accessed on March 2016), using Kimura 2-parameter model implemented in MEGA [24]. The statistical robustness of the branching orders was assessed by bootstrap analysis of 1000 replicates.

Estimation of patristic distance and reconstruction of RV transmission clusters

Communicable diseases are often disseminated through close contact between the infected and susceptible individuals. To reconstruct RV transmission clusters, the genetic distance threshold is first determined between the lowest and the highest value of the inter- and intra-patient patristic distances (measured in nucleotide substitutions per site), respectively [25]. RV sequences from different patients with a patristic distance lower than the estimated threshold, as a measure of genetic relatedness and transmission linkages of the infecting RV strains, will be identified and grouped as transmission cluster. In acute respiratory tract infection, accurate estimation of intra-patient viral genetic distance was particularly challenging due to difficulty in sampling. Therefore, the most plausible threshold value was determined from the lowest 95% confidence interval of the lower 0.05 percentile of the inter-patient genetic distance [25], as calculated from the global VP4/VP2 gene sequences of various RV types.

With the genetic distance threshold estimated, the transmission clusters were reconstructed from all newly sequenced Malaysian RV VP4/VP2 gene sequences based on the Tamura-Nei 93 (TN93) pairwise distance performed using a custom script in Python (release 3.2.6), with bootstrap analysis of 1000 replicates [25] and visualized using Gephi (version 0.9.) [26]. Although previous studies have addressed the population dynamics and transmission clusters of the respiratory viruses [12, 27], such features in RV infections have never been reported. Therefore, similar classification of transmission clusters was adopted, in which, a transmission cluster is characterized by the presence of at least two individuals (represent by nodes), whose viral sequences are genetically linked (represent by undirected edges) at the estimated genetic distance threshold supported by bootstrap value of ≥ 90%. In general, clusters were described as dyads if they contain two nodes, and networks if more than 2 nodes were observed. On the other hand, those that do not form clusters are termed as singleton.

Investigating the impact of interventions on RV transmission clusters through simulation

Preliminary investigations (either in vitro, pseudo-steady conditions or simulations) on antiviral therapy (e.g., pleconaril against enteroviruses) and other non-pharmaceutical intervention strategies (e.g., facemask and social distancing) have demonstrated moderate-to-high efficacy in inhibiting viral transmission [28, 29]. However, the efficacy of these interventions in preventing viral transmission at the population level remains unclear. To investigate the population-level impact of intervention strategies through simulation, the putative transmission clusters inferred from the VP4/VP2 gene at individual level was utilized as baseline. To quantitate the impact of interventions (facemask, oral pleconaril and social distancing) on RV transmission clusters, trials were simulated for (a) interventions with varying efficacy (0% through 100%), that corresponds to the decline in the number of infected patients (nodes) and (b) interventions with varying efficacy (0% through 100%), that corresponds to the reduction in the number of edges connecting to the nodes. For each setting (intervention efficacy), 10,000 trials were simulated. Briefly, the aligned RV VP4/VP2 sequences (accession numbers KY093077 – KY094053) in.fasta format were loaded and the procedure implemented in Python custom script was performed in less than 30 min on Linux Operating System. The scripts, Clustering.py for the construction of transmission networks and DistanceFilter.py for the assessment of interventions have been made available online and accessible at https://github.com/nglj93/Transmission-Network. The procedure was implemented in Python using custom script. The numbers of nodes and edges removed at varying intervention efficacy were plotted, from which the efficacy of an intervention required to reduce 50% proportion of the nodes (NP50) and edges (EP50) were estimated. From the plot, the impact of existing intervention strategies on viral transmission at population level were extrapolated.

Results

Prevalence and distribution of RV species among patients with acute respiratory infection

Between February 2012 and May 2014, a total of 3,935 consenting outpatients presented with symptoms of acute respiratory tract symptoms were recruited, of whom 51.1% (2,009/3,935) were positive for at least one viral pathogen in the multiplex respiratory virus panel screening assay. Among the 2,009 subjects, 976 (48.6%) were positive for RV. Neighbour-joining phylogenetic analysis of the VP4/VP2 gene showed the predominance of RV-A (48.5%; 473/976), followed by RV-C (38.1%, 372/976) and RV-B (13.4%, 131/976) [12]. Additional information (patients demographic and symptoms severity) are published online [12]

Genetic distance threshold and transmission clusters

To investigate the dynamics of RV spread in the study population, the transmission clusters were reconstructed based on the pairwise distances estimated from the global RV VP4/VP2 gene sequences, using the TN93 model. The distance threshold (the lowest 95% confidence interval of lower 0.05 percentile of the inter-patient patristic distance) for reconstruction of RV transmission clusters was estimated at 0.005 substitutions/site (across RV-A, -B, and -C) (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

The estimation of genetic distance threshold for reconstruction of RV transmission clusters. The genetic distance threshold (measured in nucleotide substitutions per site) was determined from the lowest 95% confidence interval of the lower 0.05 percentile of the inter-patient patristic distance, as calculated from the global RV VP4/VP2 gene. In the present study, the genetic threshold was estimated at 0.005 substitutions/site across RV-A, -B and -C (indicated in red dotted line)

Full size image

With this estimated genetic distance threshold, RV transmission clusters were inferred from 976 newly generated VP4/VP2 sequences, yielding a total of 168 RV transmission clusters of varying size (2–13 nodes per clusters), involving 57 genetically distinct RV types (27 RV-A, 8 RV-B, and 22 RV-C types) (Fig. 2). In general, more RV-A transmission clusters (45.2%, 76/168) were observed, comprising of 43 dyads and 33 networks. In addition, a total of 67 (39.9%) RV-C clusters (42 dyads and 25 networks) and 25 (14.9%) RV-B clusters (16 dyads and 9 networks) were identified. To test the reliability of the genetic distance threshold (0.005 substitutions/site), changes in the total number of nodes and edges observed within the clusters were estimated under a range of genetic distances (0.001 through 0.025 substitutions/site). It was shown that the total number of nodes (n = 479) and edges (n = 665) within the transmission clusters were consistent at 0.001 through 0.005 substitutions/site, suggesting that the 0.005 substitutions/site threshold did not underestimate the total number of nodes and edges observed in this dataset (Fig. 2). Importantly, no misclassifications of RV species and types were observed, highlighting the specificity and sensitivity of the analysis. In contrast, the number of nodes and edges was predictably higher (overestimated) when the genetic distance threshold was raised beyond 0.005 substitutions/site.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Transmission clusters of RV among patients presented with symptoms of acute respiratory tract infection in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia between 2012 and 2014. With an estimated genetic threshold of 0.005 substitutions/site, RV transmission clusters were inferred from 976 newly sequenced VP4/VP2 sequences based on Tamura-Nei 93 (TN93) pairwise distance performed using a custom script in Python (release 3.2.6), with bootstrap analysis of 1000 replicates. A total of 168 RV transmission clusters of varying size (2–13 nodes per cluster), involving 57 different RV types were identified. In general, more transmission clusters were observed in RV-A, followed by RV-C and -B. In the present study, transmission cluster is characterized by the presence of at least two individuals (represent by nodes), whose viral sequences are genetically linked (represent by undirected edges) at 0.005 substitutions/site supported by bootstrap value of ≥ 90%. Transmission clusters were described as dyads if they contain two nodes, and networks if more than 2 nodes were observed. Nodes are colour-coded in accordance with RV species

Full size image

Putative impact of interventions on RV transmission dynamics

In this analysis, the efficacy of an intervention strategy was measured by means of a random reduction in the number of nodes and edges in the baseline transmission clusters. To investigate the impact of intervention on the nodes and edges within the clusters, varying degree of efficacy (0% through 100%) were simulated at 10,000 intervention trials. As anticipated, the total number of nodes and edges was inversely associated with the increasing efficacy of an intervention strategy (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3
figure 3

The probable impact of an intervention with varying efficacy on the dynamics of RV transmission. A It is shown that the total number of nodes is inversely associated with the efficacy of an intervention. It is hypothesized that an intervention requires a minimum efficacy of 56.1% to remove 50% of the nodes (NP50) within RV transmission clusters. B Similar inversed association was observed between the total number of edges and the efficacy of an intervention, in which a minimum efficacy of 34.1% is required to remove 50% of the edges (EP50) within RV transmission clusters. For each setting (intervention efficacy), 10,000 trials were simulated. The procedure was implemented in Python (release 3.2.6) using custom script

Full size image

It was determined that an intervention strategy requires an efficacy of at least 56.1% and 34.1% to remove 50% proportion of the nodes (NP50) and edges (EP50) within the transmission clusters, respectively. Next, the impact of existing intervention strategies on viral transmissions at population level was extrapolated. It was plotted that facemask, with an efficacy of 45% [29] was able to eliminate only 7.3% (34.9/479) and 65.4% (434.6/665) of nodes and edges within RV transmission clusters, respectively (Table 1).

Table 1 The extrapolated impact of facemask, pleconaril and social distancing on RV transmission dynamics at the population level
Full size table

On the other hand, unlicensed viral capsid-binding pleconaril, with a previously reported efficacy of approximately 87% [30] removed 94.8% (454.1/479) of nodes and 98.6% (655.8/665) of edges within RV transmission clusters [29]. Lastly, social distancing with a previously reported hypothetical efficacy of approximately 90% [31] eradicated 94.9% (454.4/479) and nearly 100% (664.7/665) of nodes and edges, respectively.

Discussion

Acute respiratory tract infection is one of the most common infectious diseases in humans, contributing to approximately 15% of deaths due to all causes among children less than 5-year-old and responsible for over 4 million of annual deaths worldwide [1]. Although several viruses have been implicated in acute respiratory infections, the prevalence of RV is frequently observed [32]. Importantly, the involvement of RV in fatal respiratory outbreaks and the lower respiratory compartment resulting in severe respiratory conditions such as pneumonia, bronchiolitis, chronic bronchitis and exacerbation of asthma have become increasingly evident [10, 11, 33]. Despite the clinical burden, the transmission pattern of RV and the effectiveness of interventions in decelerating viral transmission have not been reported to date.

The dissemination and expansion of infectious diseases are primarily traced through passive and active surveillance that largely relies on the cooperation of the healthcare providers to report the cases, and deliberate search for cases through population survey [34, 35]. However, these resource-intensive methods are not without setbacks that could compromise the quality of the surveillance data, due to self-reported inaccuracies and data incompleteness. Interestingly, several studies have demonstrated the importance of molecular epidemiological surveillance in elucidating the epidemic linkages within a population [13, 25], thereby establishing a new frontier in delineating viral transmission dynamics.

In the present study, a network-based approach of which the degree of RV spread that fuel disease transmission in the region was mapped for the first time, using a programming language-based approach. With the TN93 pairwise distance estimate of the VP4/VP2 gene (Fig. 1), the transmission clusters of RV-A, -B and -C were inferred. Based on previously described criteria of transmission clusters [25], a substantial clustering pattern (49.1%, 479/976 of Malaysian RV VP4/VP2 sequences) involving numerous transmission clusters was identified (Fig. 2). This finding highlight that the RV disease burden observed between February 2012 and May 2014 in Kuala Lumpur was largely contributed by the presence of multiple sub-epidemics, predominantly driven by RV-A and -C. In the absence of effective interventions, the continuous emergence of RV transmission clusters plays an important role in disease persistence and expansion in the population.

The utilization of (passive and active) surveillance data in conceptualized framework [31] or computational models [36] to decipher the effectiveness of interventions in repressing the spread of respiratory virus within a community has been previously demonstrated. However, due to the nature of surveillance data [31, 36], the effectiveness of interventions in mitigating viral transmission at the population level remains to be ascertained. In the present study, which was established based on the large-scale molecular surveillance data, new parameters namely the NP50 and EP50 were proposed as a potential indicator that implies the effectiveness of an intervention. Through computational simulations, the NP50 and EP50 were estimated (Fig. 3), below which an intervention may be deemed less effective in controlling RV transmission at the population level.

In a prospective trial, the implementation of mask-wearing policy has been shown to reduce parainfluenza virus-associated respiratory illnesses [37]. However, the study was only limited within a hospital, highlighting the effects of mask-wearing on viral spread in the wider population remains debatable. Importantly, present study highlighted that facemask, with a reported efficacy of 45% [29], confers moderate advantage in limiting RV transmission clusters at the population level. This finding suggests that facemask may be of value in providing protections against respiratory viruses, especially among individuals at risk in controlled settings (i.e., hospitals). Social distancing is another commonly implemented public health non-pharmaceutical intervention strategy to minimize viral transmission in the time of disease epidemics, as observed in the recent COVID-19 pandemic [21]. Here, it has been shown that, social distancing is highly effective in controlling viral transmission and suppressing the expansion of RV transmission clusters. Such estimation is in line with previously reported findings that indicated social distancing can hypothetically reduce the influenza attack rate by at least 90% [28], suggesting that such strategy could be effective in providing defense against virus transmission in the absence of vaccine or antiviral therapy [38]. Although such strategy provides the highest level of protection, the implementation of social distancing can be challenging because the high level of compliance during the period of epidemic is the mainstay to the success of such strategy, as observed in recent COVD-19 pandemic [39].

Pleconaril is a capsid-binding antiviral that interferes the viral interaction with host cellular receptor, thereby inhibiting viral replication [30]. In a placebo-controlled trial, it has been shown that early pleconaril treatment was associated with a rapid loss of RV and heightened symptoms relief effects, highlighting its high therapeutic efficacy against RV-induced community-acquired respiratory infections [30]. Likewise, in the present network-based extrapolation, similar effect of pleconaril was reported, as reflected in a significant reduction in the number of nodes and edges (≥ 95%) within RV transmission clusters at population level. Despite the promising therapeutic impact, pleconaril remains unlicensed and its usage has been hindered by its pharmacodynamics (e.g., drug side effects and drug interactions), as observed in preliminary randomized trial [40].

In the present study, the potential use of transmission clusters in understanding RV spread and in estimating the impact of interventions on RV transmission dynamics at the population level have been demonstrated. However, limitations do exist in the analysis. For instance, the deduced number (and size) of RV transmission clusters could have been underestimated because the study subjects were recruited from a single medical center. Although genetic data have been proven useful and informative in defining transmission networks, a study of such nature should be expanded to multiple recruiting locations with an extended study period, to improve the resolution and mapping of RV spatiotemporal transmission dynamics at the population level. As for the genetic distance threshold estimation, it is important to note that the current threshold was estimated based on several RV representatives with the most VP4/VP2 sequences available for analysis. With the high genetic diversity of RV and the increasing numbers of new RV VP4/VP2 sequences, the need to re-estimate and update the genetic distance threshold for a more reliable analysis is inevitable.

Likewise, since the protective effects of facemask, pleconaril and social distancing were previously estimated either through pseudo-steady conditions, simulations or in vitro experiments involving other viruses, the actual protective effects of these interventions on RV transmission remain elusive. However, when RV-related data are readily available, this proof-of-concept analysis may shed new insight into the effectiveness of the interventions in suppressing RV transmission at the population level.

Furthermore, current analysis focused primarily on nodes that formed transmission clusters, hence undermining the contribution of singleton in persistence and expansion of RV infection. Also, due to lack of evidence that explain the potential effects of viral factors (i.e., RV species, viral load, resistant strain), host factors (immunological response, pharmacogenetic traits) and other behavioral factors (compliance and coverage of interventions) on the RV transmission dynamics, these factors were not taken into account in our analysis. Upon availability of these information, investigations through agent-based simulation would be useful, as recently observed through 2014 Ebola outbreak [41]. In addition, future investigations should also incorporate analysis at protein level, and perhaps should garner more data from experimental work to complement findings from in silico analysis.

Although further refinement of the analysis may be necessary (when RV-related epidemiological data are readily available) to yield a real-world representation, the present study has demonstrated the resilience of genetic transmission cluster analysis in mapping transmission dynamic and estimating the potential impact of interventions on RV transmissions. Importantly, the complementary incorporation of this proof-of-concept analysis into conventional surveillance may further strengthen the epidemiological evidence, which usually limits by data incompleteness and self-reported inaccuracy.

Conclusion

Viral genetic information is useful and robust in reconstructing the putative transmission linkages within a population with limited epidemiological data and in estimating the probable effects of interventions on viral transmission. For the first time, a network-based approach of which the degree of RV spread as well as its temporal dynamics that drive disease transmission in Kuala Lumpur, between 2012 and 2014 were mapped. A prominent clustering pattern was observed, highlighting that the RV disease burden was largely contributed by the presence of multiple sub-epidemics, driven predominantly by RV-A followed by RV-C and -B. It is important to note that no misclassifications of RV species and types were observed, highlighting the robustness of this resilient proof-of-concept analysis. In addition, the potential use of RV genetic network in assessing the impact of intervention on disease transmission was demonstrated, where social distancing is predicted to be an effective non-pharmaceutical intervention in suppressing RV transmission. The integration of such analysis into conventional epidemiological surveillance may enable the near real-time investigation of viral spread and transmission dynamics, pre-informing risk assessment for impeding disease outbreaks.

Availability of data and materials

Nucleotide sequences generated in the study have been deposited in GenBank under the accession numbers KY093077-KY094062. The python scripts have been made available online and accessible at https://github.com/nglj93/Transmission-Network.

Abbreviations

COPD:

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

COVID-19:

Coronavirus disease

EP50 :

50% Proportion of the edges

MERS-CoV:

Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus

NP50 :

50% Proportion of the nodes

PCR:

Polymerase chain reaction

RV:

Rhinovirus

RV-A:

Rhinovirus A

RV-B:

Rhinovirus B

RV-C:

Rhinovirus C

SARS-CoV-2:

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2

TN93:

Tamura-Nei 93

References

  1. Wang X, Li Y, O’Brien KL, Madhi SA, Widdowson MA, Byass P, Omer SB, Abbas Q, Ali A, Amu A, et al. Global burden of respiratory infections associated with seasonal influenza in children under 5 years in 2018: a systematic review and modelling study. Lancet Glob Health. 2020;8(4):e497–510. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(19)30545-5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Sakamoto H, Ishikane M, Ueda P. Seasonal influenza activity during the SARS-CoV-2 outbreak in Japan. JAMA. 2020;323(19):1969–71. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2020.6173.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Wu D, Lu J, Liu Y, Zhang Z, Luo L. Positive effects of COVID-19 control measures on influenza prevention. Int J Infect Dis. 2020;95:345–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2020.04.009.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Wu D, Liu Q, Wu T, Wang D, Lu J. The impact of COVID-19 control measures on the morbidity of varicella, herpes zoster, rubella and measles in Guangzhou. China Immun Inflamm Dis. 2020;8(4):844–6. https://doi.org/10.1002/iid3.352.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Wu D, Lu J, Sun Z, Cao L, Zeng Q, Liu Q, Wu T, Yang Z. Rhinovirus remains prevalent in school teenagers during fight against COVID-19 pandemic. Immun Inflamm Dis. 2021;9(1):76–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/iid3.381.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Stobart CC, Nosek JM, Moore ML. Rhinovirus biology, antigenic diversity, and advancements in the design of a human rhinovirus vaccine. Front Microbiol. 2017;8:2412. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2017.02412.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Baillie VL, Moore DP, Mathunjwa A, Morailane P, Simoes EAF, Madhi SA. A prospective case-control study on the association of Rhinovirus nasopharyngeal viral load and viremia in South African children hospitalized with severe pneumonia. J Clin Virol. 2020;125:104288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcv.2020.104288.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Ishiguro T, Yoshida Y, Kobayashi Y, Shimizu Y, Takayanagi N. Primary rhinovirus pneumonia in which bronchoalveolar lavage fluid yielded human rhinovirus. Respir Med Case Rep. 2019;28:100910. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmcr.2019.100910.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Zhu J, Mallia P, Footitt J, Qiu Y, Message SD, Kebadze T, Aniscenko J, Barnes PJ, Adcock IM, Kon OM, et al. Bronchial mucosal inflammation and illness severity in response to experimental rhinovirus infection in COPD. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2020;146(4):840–50 e7 doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2020.03.021

  10. Montgomery ST, Frey DL, Mall MA, Stick SM, Kicic A, Arest CF. Rhinovirus infection is associated with airway epithelial cell necrosis and inflammation via interleukin-1 in young children with cystic fibrosis. Front Immunol. 2020;11:596. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2020.00596.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Bergroth E, Aakula M, Elenius V, Remes S, Piippo-Savolainen E, Korppi M, Piedra PA, Bochkov YA, Gern JE, Camargo CA, Jr., et al. Rhinovirus type in severe bronchiolitis and the development of asthma. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract 2020;8(2):588–95 e4 doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaip.2019.08.043

  12. Ng KT, Oong XY, Lim SH, Chook JB, Takebe Y, Chan YF, Chan KG, Hanafi NS, Pang YK, Kamarulzaman A, et al. Viral load and sequence analysis reveal the symptom severity, diversity, and transmission clusters of rhinovirus infections. Clin Infect Dis. 2018;67(2):261–8. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciy063.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Cauchemez S, Fraser C, Van Kerkhove MD, Donnelly CA, Riley S, Rambaut A, Enouf V, van der Werf S, Ferguson NM. Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus: quantification of the extent of the epidemic, surveillance biases, and transmissibility. Lancet Infect Dis. 2014;14(1):50–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(13)70304-9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kraemer MUG, Golding N, Bisanzio D, Bhatt S, Pigott DM, Ray SE, Brady OJ, Brownstein JS, Faria NR, Cummings DAT, et al. Utilizing general human movement models to predict the spread of emerging infectious diseases in resource poor settings. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):5151. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-41192-3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Liu J, Liao X, Qian S, Yuan J, Wang F, Liu Y, Wang Z, Wang FS, Liu L, Zhang Z. Community transmission of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, Shenzhen, China, 2020. Emerg Infect Dis. 2020. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid2606.200239.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Stepanova E, Isakova-Sivak I, Rudenko L. Overview of human rhinovirus immunogenic epitopes for rational vaccine design. Expert Rev Vaccines. 2019;18(9):877–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/14760584.2019.1657014.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Ng KT, Takebe Y, Kamarulzaman A, Tee KK. Genome sequencing and phylogenetic reconstruction reveal a potential fourth rhinovirus species and its worldwide distribution. Arch Virol. 2021;166(1):225–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00705-020-04855-5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Palmenberg AC, Spiro D, Kuzmickas R, Wang S, Djikeng A, Rathe JA, Fraser-Liggett CM, Liggett SB. Sequencing and analyses of all known human rhinovirus genomes reveal structure and evolution. Science. 2009;324(5923):55–9. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1165557.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Liu Y, Hill MG, Klose T, Chen Z, Watters K, Bochkov YA, Jiang W, Palmenberg AC, Rossmann MG. Atomic structure of a rhinovirus C, a virus species linked to severe childhood asthma. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016;113(32):8997–9002. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1606595113.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Cheng KK, Lam TH, Leung CC. Wearing face masks in the community during the COVID-19 pandemic: altruism and solidarity. Lancet. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30918-1.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Zhang J, Litvinova M, Liang Y, Wang Y, Wang W, Zhao S, Wu Q, Merler S, Viboud C, Vespignani A, et al. Changes in contact patterns shape the dynamics of the COVID-19 outbreak in China. Science. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abb8001.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Wertheim JO, Kosakovsky Pond SL, Little SJ, De Gruttola V. Using HIV transmission networks to investigate community effects in HIV prevention trials. PLoS ONE. 2011;6(11): e27775. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0027775.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Savolainen C, Blomqvist S, Mulders MN, Hovi T. Genetic clustering of all 102 human rhinovirus prototype strains: serotype 87 is close to human enterovirus 70. J Gen Virol. 2002;83:333–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Kumar S, Stecher G, Li M, Knyaz C, Tamura K. MEGA X: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis across computing platforms. Mol Biol Evol. 2018;35(6):1547–9. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msy096.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Chow WZ, Chan YF, Oong XY, Ng LJ, Nor ES, Ng KT, Chan KG, Hanafi NS, Pang YK, Kamarulzaman A, et al. Genetic diversity, seasonality and transmission network of human metapneumovirus: identification of a unique sub-lineage of the fusion and attachment genes. Sci Rep. 2016;6:27730. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep27730.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Jacomy M, Venturini T, Heymann S, Bastian M. ForceAtlas2, a continuous graph layout algorithm for handy network visualization designed for the Gephi software. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(6):e98679. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0098679.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Oong XY, Ng KT, Tan JL, Chan KG, Kamarulzaman A, Chan YF, Sam IC, Tee KK. Whole-genome phylogenetic analysis of influenza B/Phuket/3073/2013-like viruses and unique reassortants detected in Malaysia between 2012 and 2014. PLoS ONE. 2017;12(1):e0170610. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0170610.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Glass RJ, Glass LM, Beyeler WE, Min HJ. Targeted social distancing design for pandemic influenza. Emerg Infect Dis. 2006;12(11):1671–81. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid1211.060255.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Lai AC, Poon CK, Cheung AC. Effectiveness of facemasks to reduce exposure hazards for airborne infections among general populations. J R Soc Interface. 2012;9(70):938–48. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2011.0537.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Pevear DC, Hayden FG, Demenczuk TM, Barone LR, McKinlay MA, Collett MS. Relationship of pleconaril susceptibility and clinical outcomes in treatment of common colds caused by rhinoviruses. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2005;49(11):4492–9. https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.49.11.4492-4499.2005.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Glass LM, Glass RJ. Social contact networks for the spread of pandemic influenza in children and teenagers. BMC Public Health. 2008;8:61. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-8-61.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Okomo U, Idoko OT, Kampmann B. The burden of viral respiratory infections in young children in low-resource settings. Lancet Glob Health. 2020;8(4):e454–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(20)30037-1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Rajput C, Han M, Ishikawa T, Lei J, Jazaeri S, Bentley JK, Hershenson MB. Early-life heterologous rhinovirus infections induce an exaggerated asthma-like phenotype. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2020;146(3):571–82 e3 doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2020.03.039

  34. Delabouglise A, Antoine-Moussiaux N, Phan TD, Dao DC, Nguyen TT, Truong BD, Nguyen XN, Vu TD, Nguyen KV, Le HT, et al. The perceived value of passive animal health surveillance: the case of highly pathogenic avian influenza in vietnam. Zoonoses Public Health. 2016;63(2):112–28. https://doi.org/10.1111/zph.12212.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Zhou G, Afrane YA, Malla S, Githeko AK, Yan G. Active case surveillance, passive case surveillance and asymptomatic malaria parasite screening illustrate different age distribution, spatial clustering and seasonality in western Kenya. Malaria J. 2015;14:41. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-015-0551-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Bell DC, Belli-McQueen B, Haider A. Partner naming and forgetting: recall of network members. Soc Networks. 2007;29(2):279–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2006.12.004.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Sung AD, Sung JA, Thomas S, Hyslop T, Gasparetto C, Long G, Rizzieri D, Sullivan KM, Corbet K, Broadwater G, et al. Universal mask usage for reduction of respiratory viral infections after stem cell transplant: a prospective trial. Clin Infect Dis. 2016;63(8):999–1006. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciw451.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Lim PL, Lee TH, Rowe EK. Middle east respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS CoV): update 2013. Curr Infect Dis Rep. 2013;15(4):295–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11908-013-0344-2.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Yezli S, Khan A. COVID-19 social distancing in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia: Bold measures in the face of political, economic, social and religious challenges. Travel Med Infect Dis. 2020;37:101692. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmaid.2020.101692.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Hayden FG, Herrington DT, Coats TL, Kim K, Cooper EC, Villano SA, Liu S, Hudson S, Pevear DC, Collett M, et al. Efficacy and safety of oral pleconaril for treatment of colds due to picornaviruses in adults: results of 2 double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trials. Clin Infect Dis. 2003;36(12):1523–32. https://doi.org/10.1086/375069.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Siettos C, Anastassopoulou C, Russo L, Grigoras C, Mylonakis E. Modeling the 2014 Ebola virus epidemic—agent-based simulations, temporal analysis and future predictions for liberia and Sierra Leone. PLoS Curr. 2015. https://doi.org/10.1371/currents.outbreaks.8d5984114855fc425e699e1a18cdc6c9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Nik Sherina Hanafi (Department of Primary Care Medicine, University of Malaya, Malaysia), Yong Kek Pang (Department of Medicine, University of Malaya, Malaysia) and Yoke Fun Chan (Department of Medical Microbiology, University of Malaya, Malaysia) for assistance and support. We would also like to extend our gratitude to all individuals who have agreed to participate in the study.

Funding

This work was supported in part by grants from the Fundamental Research Grant Scheme (FRGS/1/2020/SKK0/UM/02/17), Faculty Research Grant (GPF002C-2019) and High Impact Research Grant (UM.C/625/1/HIR/MOE/CHAN/02/02) to K.K.T and Postgraduate Research Fund (PG097-2015A) from University of Malaya to K.T.N. K.T.N is currently supported by a NUSMed Post-Doctoral Fellowship, National University of Singapore.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

    Kim Tien Ng & Adeeba Kamarulzaman

  2. Infectious Diseases Translational Research Program, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore

    Kim Tien Ng

  3. Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University Health System, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore

    Kim Tien Ng

  4. Faculty of Information Science and Technology, Multimedia University, Melaka, Malaysia

    Liang Jie Ng

  5. Department of Medical Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

    Xiang Yong Oong, Yutaka Takebe & Kok Keng Tee

  6. School of Medical and Life Sciences, Sunway University, Bandar Sunway, Selangor Darul Ehsan, Malaysia

    Jack Bee Chook & Kok Keng Tee

  7. Division of Genetics and Molecular Biology, Institute of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Science, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

    Kok Gan Chan

  8. AIDS Research Center, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Toyama, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan

    Yutaka Takebe

Authors
  1. Kim Tien Ng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Liang Jie Ng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Xiang Yong Oong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jack Bee Chook
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Kok Gan Chan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Yutaka Takebe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Adeeba Kamarulzaman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Kok Keng Tee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: K.T.N., L.J.N. and K.K.T. Performed the experiments: K.T.N., L.J.N., X.Y.O. and K.K.T. Analyzed the data: K.T.N., L.J.N. and K.K.T. Contributed reagents/material: K.T.N., L.J.N., X.Y.O., J.B.C., K.G.C., Y.T., A.K. and K.K.T. Wrote the paper: K.T.N. and K.K.T. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kok Keng Tee.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the University Malaya Medical Ethics Committee (reference number 890.1). Written consent was obtained from all patients. Patients were briefed about the nature of the research in terms of methodology, possible adverse effects and complications. Patients were aware that they can withdraw from this research at any time without assigning any reason whatsoever and in such a situation shall not be denied the benefits of usual treatment by the attending doctors.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declared no competing interests exist.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ng, K.T., Ng, L.J., Oong, X.Y. et al. Application of a VP4/VP2-inferred transmission clusters in estimating the impact of interventions on rhinovirus transmission. Virol J 19, 36 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12985-022-01762-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12985-022-01762-w

Keywords

Virology Journal

ISSN: 1743-422X