Skip to main content
Download PDF

Prevalence, characteristics, and distribution of HPV genotypes in women from Zhejiang Province, 2016–2020

Virology Journal volume 18, Article number: 208 (2021) Cite this article

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate and understand the prevalence of HPV genotypes and characteristics of female populations in specific areas and the relationship with cervical lesions, which can effectively guide cervical cancer screening and formulate HPV vaccine prevention strategies.

Methods

A total of 77,443 women who visited gynecological clinics and underwent health examinations in the Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine during 2016–2020 were enrolled in this survey. Cervical samples were collected for HPV DNA genotyping and cervical cytology testing. Cervical biopsies were performed for patients with visible cervical abnormality or abnormal cytological results.

Results

The results showed the 5-year overall positive rate was 22.3%, of which the gynecology clinic group had significantly more positive results compared with the health examination group (P < 0.001). The five most common genotypes in Zhejiang Province were HPV 52, 58, CP8304, 16, and 51 (23.9%, 12.7%, 11.7%, 11.7% and 9.3%). HPV infection was age-specific, with the highest infection rate in the age group ≤ 20 compared to other age groups (P < 0.001). HPV infection was also season-specific, with the highest infection rate in spring or winter. The main HPV infection mode was single infection (P = 0.004), but patients ≤ 20 years old were more likely to develop multiple infections (51.0%). HPV 16, 52 and 58 were the main genotypes that caused cytological abnormalities and HPV16, 18, 56, 58 and 66 were independent risk factors for cervical lesions (OR = 2.352, 1.567, 2.000, 1.694, 1.889; all P < 0.05). Further analysis found HPV 16 and 18 were the main genotypes that cause cervical cancer histological abnormalities and were independent risk factors for cervical cancer (OR = 5.647, P < 0.001; OR = 3.495, P = 0.036).

Conclusion

This article analyzed the prevalence of distribution characteristics of HPV infection and revealed the corelation between HPV infection and cytological and histological abnormalities. Comprehensive results of this survey will help Zhejiang Province to formulate public health policies and provide evidence for future selection of specific HPV vaccines.

Introduction

As the fourth most common cancer among women worldwide [1], cervical cancer is a significant threat to women. Globally, there are more than 500,000 new cases of cervical cancer each year. Approximately 250,000 women die from cervical cancer every year [2].

Persistent human papillomavirus (HPV) infection is a significant factor in causing cervical cancer [3]. At present, more than 200 types of HPV have been identified. According to the pathogenicity, HPV invades the genital tract and is usually categorized as high-risk (HR) or low-risk (LR) genotypes. It is reported that more than 15 HR-HPV genotypes are linked with the development of cervical cancer. HPV 16, 18, 31, 33, 35, 45, 52, and 58 are related to 90% of invasive cervical cancer [4]. Additionally, LR-HPV genotypes, including HPV 6, 11, 42, 43, and 44 are related to proliferative lesions [5, 6].

However, cervical cancer is a highly preventable and curable cancer; primary prevention and screening are the most effective ways to release the burden of HPV infection and reduce the mortality of cervical cancer. It is noteworthy that the promotion of the HPV vaccine has made a significant contribution to the prevention of cervical cancer [7,8,9]. The HPV vaccine currently implemented in Zhejiang Province includes bivalent, quadrivalent, and 9-valent vaccines. The 9-valent HPV vaccine targets HPV 6, 11, 16, 18, 31, 33, 45, 52, and 58, and potentially offers 90% protection against cervical cancer [10].

Due to differences in climate, living habits, and population distribution, different regions show different infection rates of HPV in China [11, 12]. Understanding the prevalence and distribution of HPV genotypes in a specific area is of great significance for guiding the use of cervical cancer vaccines in the area and formulating cervical cancer prevention and treatment strategies. There are currently several studies that have observed the HPV epidemiology in Zhejiang Province but the results vary significantly [13,14,15].

This article collected data from patients who have undergone HPV screening in the Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine’s health examination center and gynecological clinic between 2016 and 2020. The study analyzed the prevalence of HPV infection, the distribution of genotypes, and the characteristics of age-specific and season-specific infections. At the same time, the association of HPV infection with histological and cytological results were observed. This study aimed to provide a reference for the early prevention, detection, and control of cervical cancer, and a guide for the promotion and application of targeted vaccines for women in Zhejiang Province.

Methods

Patients and enrollment criteria

The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, as a well-known top hospital in the capital city of Zhejiang Province and one of the designated hospitals for cervical cancer screening, has huge daily outpatient visits and diverse patients, has huge daily outpatient visits and diverse patients. In this retrospective study, in order to obtain more accurate and reliable data, we collected large-scale data on female patients who attended health examination center and gynecological outpatient clinics of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine during 2016–2020. All patients were divided into two groups: health examination group (HEG) and gynecological clinic group (GCG). This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine. The review committee waived the need of patients’ consent due to anonymous analyses of the data. The management and publication of patient information in this study was strictly in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, including the confidentiality and anonymity.

Inclusion criteria: (1) history of sexual activity at any age; (2) voluntary HPV test; (3) had not had sexual intercourse, nor used vaginal drugs in the previous 48 h; and (4) had not been vaccinated against HPV.

Exclusion criteria: (1) patients with other infections or autoimmune diseases; (2) pregnant women; (3) patients who had undergone cervical surgery or hysterectomy; and (4) patients who had undergone immunosuppressive therapy.

Cervical samples collection

The clinician used a speculum to expose the cervix and wipe off excessive secretions with a cotton swab. A cervical brush was rotated slowly in one direction for 6–7 times to obtain sufficient cervical epithelial cells; this was repeated twice. One of the cytology brushes was used for HPV-DNA detection, and the other brush was placed in preservation solution for a ThinPrep cytologic test (TCT, Hologic, USA, MA). All samples were stored at 4 ℃ and tested within 48 h.

HPV DNA genotyping

The PCR-reverse dot blot hybridization test was used for HPV DNA genotyping detection. The YN-H16 constant temperature hybridization instrument, cervical exfoliated cell collector, and HPV genotyping detection kit were provided by 21 HPV GenoArray Diagnostic Kit (HBGA-21PKG) (Hybribio, China, Guangdong) and GenPlex® microfluidic automatic nucleic acid detection (Type 24, Bohui, China, Beijing). HPV DNA extraction, PCR amplification, hybridization, and result interpretation were performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

It is worth noting that the position where the blue spots appear on the membrane strip relates to genotype information marked on the corresponding position. If only one genotype site has blue spots, it indicates a single infection of the corresponding genotype; if multiple genotype sites have blue spots, it indicates a mixed infection of the corresponding genotypes.Two types of HPV genotype tests were carried out clinically, HPV-DNA 21 and HPV-DNA 24, and included 18 high-risk HPV types (16, 18, 31, 33, 35, 39, 45, 51, 52, 53, 56, 58, 59, 66, 68, 73, 82, and 83), and seven low-risk HPV types (6, 11, 42, 43, 44, 81, and CP8304) [16].

ThinPrep cytologic test

Cervical slides were analyzed with TCT and diagnosed by two experienced pathologists. The TCT results were classified according to the Bethesda 2001 criteria [17], including negatives of intraepithelial lesions or malignancy (NILM); Atypical glandular cells (AGC); atypical squamous cells high-grade (ASC-H); atypical squamous cells, not excluding high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (ASC-US); low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL); high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL); and invasive cervical cancer (ICC).

Histology diagnosis

A cervical biopsy was performed for patients with visible cervical abnormality or abnormal cytological results. The histology results were graded by two professional pathologists according to the pathological diagnosis standard criteria, including no lesions, cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN 1, CIN 2, CIN 3), and cervical cancer.

Statistical analysis

All statistical analyses were performed using R software 3.5.1, Excel 2019 and SPSS 22.0 software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Numerical data were expressed as a percentage (%). Pearson's χ2 test and binary logistic regression analysis were performed to evaluate the significance of the difference between the specified groups. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Prevalence of HPV infection in HEG and GCG

In total, data was collected from 77,443 HPV screening tests from the HEG (n = 29,216) and GCG (n = 48,227) between 2016 and 2020. Among them, 17,234 HPV-positive patients were screened and the average infection rate over 5 years was 22.3%. The annual HPV infection rates in HEG were 13.2%, 13.6%, 15.3%, 13.6%, and 12.4%, and the 5-year average infection rate was 13.6 ± 0.9% (Table 1). The annual HPV infection rates in GCG were 23.7%, 27.1%, 28.5%, 28.6%, and 27.4%, and the 5-year average infection rate was 27.0 ± 1.8% (Table 1). The HPV infection rate in the GCG was significantly higher than HEG (P < 0.001).

Table1 The HPV infection rate of gynecology clinic group and health examination group, 2016–2020
Full size table

Prevalence of HPV infection change by year and season

The change trend of HPV infection rate from 2016 to 2020 in HEG and GCG can be observed by comparing the data in Table 1 horizontally. The infection rate in HEG was generally stable during the 5-year period while the GCG and overall infection rate demonstrated an upward trend each year. In addition, the infection rates over different seasons of each year were also analyzed, as shown in Fig. 1. Despite the difference of infection rates between each season was not significant (P = 0.063), it can be seen that during 2016–2020, the HPV infection rate in summer was the lowest; the HPV infection rate in winter or spring was the highest.

Fig. 1
figure 1

The prevalence of HPV infection rate over different seasons from 2016 to 2020. The HPV infection rate in summer was the lowest; the HPV infection rate in winter or spring was the highest during the 2016–2020

Full size image

Distribution of HPV genotypes in HEG and GCG

The distribution of infection rate for each genotype over the 5-year period is shown in Fig. 2. Overall, the five genotypes with the highest positive rate were HPV 52 (23.9%), 58 (12.7%), CP8304 (11.7%), 16 (11.7%), and 51 (9.3%).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Distribution of HPV genotypes over the past 5 years. The distribution of infection rate for each genotype in the past 5 years is shown in Fig. 2. HPV 52 and 58 were two most common genotypes

Full size image

In HEG, the top five genotypes were HPV 52, 58, CP8304, 16, and 53, and the positive rates were 23.5%, 11.0%, 10.8%, 9.0% and 9.0% respectively. In GCG, the top five genotypes were HPV 52, 58, 16, CP8304 and 51, and the infection rates were 24.0%, 13.2%, 12.5%, 9.5%, and 9.5%.

Prevalence of HPV grouped by age in study population

Among the 77,443 patients included in this study, patient’s ages ranged from 10 to 98 years old with an average of 41 ± 11 years. All patients were divided into seven age groups (≤ 20, 21–30, 31–40, 41–50, 51–60, 61–70, and > 70). HPV infection rates in different age groups were analyzed as shown in Fig. 3. The overall age-specific prevalence curve revealed two peaks. The first peak appeared in the ≤ 20 group and the infection rate was 51.2%. As the age increased, the infection rate decreased, until the second peak occurred in the age group 61–70 and the infection rate was 26.6%. The age-specific prevalence curve of HEG and GCG also showed two peaks at the ≤ 20 and 61–70 age groups. In addition, the HPV infection rate in ≤ 20 age group was significantly higher than that in other groups (P < 0.001).

Fig. 3
figure 3

The overall age-specific HPV infection rate over the past 5-years. The HPV infection rate in different age groups is shown in Fig. 3. The ≤ 20 age group had the highest infection rate and the age group 61–70 ranked second

Full size image

Distribution of HPV genotypes grouped by age in HPV-positive population

We further evaluated the positive rate of each genotype in each age group to explore the age-specific distribution of genotypes.

It can be observed that, regardless of age group, HPV 52 had the highest positive rate (P < 0.05). The distribution of HR-HPV and LR-HPV in different age groups is shown in Fig. 4. Among HR-HPV, HPV 58 ranked second in most age group. In the age groups of ≤ 20 and 21–30, HPV 16 ranked second. Among LR HPV, CP8304 had the highest positive rate in most age groups, except the ≤ 20 and > 70 groups.

Fig. 4
figure 4

HR-HPV and LR-HPV distribution in different age groups during the past 5 years. Among HR HPV, HPV 52 has the highest positive rate. Among LR HPV, CP8304 has the highest positive rate in most age groups, except the ≤ 20 and > 70 group

Full size image

Prevalence of HPV single and multiple HPV genotypes infection

Table 2 showed the distribution characteristics of HPV infection type in different age groups. Single infections were the most common infection pattern in all age groups (P = 0.004). The infection rate of single infections reached its peak in the 41–50 group. Regarding multiple infections, the main manifestation was a double infection. The age group of ≤ 20 accounted for the largest proportion.

Table 2 Prevalence of single and multiple HPV infections in different age groups
Full size table

It is worth noting that in the age group ≤ 20, the probability of multiple infections (double + triple + quadruple + fifth infections) was higher than single infection, which accounted for more than 50%.

Distribution of HPV genotypes according to cytology abnormalities

The process of obtaining cytological test results and pathological biopsy specimens is shown in Fig. 5. For further screening of 17,234 positive HPV patients, the cytology results from 3912 patients were analyzed. The distribution of HPV genotypes in different cytology results is shown in Table 3. Among them, 487 patients demonstrated abnormal cytology (12.5%). The results suggest that HPV52, 16, and 58 are the three main genotypes that cause cytological abnormalities, regardless of the stage of cervical lesions. In addition, the results of multivariate logistic regression analysis are shown in Fig. 6. HPV16, 18, 56, 58 and 66 were independent risk factors for abnormal cervical cytology (OR = 2.352, 1.567, 2.000, 1.694, 1.889; all P < 0.05).

Fig. 5
figure 5

Flow chart of the study samples. The process of obtaining cytological test results and pathological biopsy specimens is shown in Fig. 5

Full size image
Table 3 Distribution of HPV genotypes according to cytology abnormalities
Full size table
Fig. 6
figure 6

Multivariate logistic regression analysis of risk factors for cervical cytology abnormalities. Odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals of HPV genotypes associated with abnormal cervical cytology were provided. HPV16, 18, 56, 58 and 66 were independent risk factors for abnormal cervical cytology. Other HPV genotypes showed no significant differences in abnormal specimens from normal specimens and no OR was listed

Full size image

Distribution of HPV genotypes according to histological abnormalities

A total of 1637 HPV-positive patients were pathologically diagnosed after vaginal biopsy. Among them, 642 cases had histological abnormalities (39.2%).

The distribution of HPV genotypes in different histology results is shown in Table 4. Among the 291 CIN 1, HPV 52 was the dominant genotype (27.5%), followed by HPV 16 (17.2%), and HPV 58 (15.8%). Among the 164 CIN 2, HPV 16 was the dominant genotype (31.1%), followed by HPV 52, and HPV 58 (both 26.6%). Among the 152 CIN 3, HPV 16 was the dominant genotype (46.1%), followed by HPV 52 (19.7%), and HPV 58 (15.8%). Among the 36 cervical cancer results, HPV 16 (58.3%) and 18 (22.2%) were the main genotypes. It was observed that as the degree of cervical lesions worsen, the infection rate of HPV16 increases (from 17.2 to 58.3%). As shown in Fig. 7, multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that patients infected with HPV 16, 31, 33 or 58 have a significantly increased risk of occuring cervical lesions (including cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and cervical cancer) (OR = 1.818, P < 0.001; OR = 2.226, P = 0.001; OR = 1.638, P = 0.009; OR = 1.421, P = 0.013); patients infected with HPV16 or 18 are at increased risk of developing cervical cancer from cervical epithelial neoplasia (OR = 5.647, P < 0.001; OR = 3.495, P = 0.036).

Table 4 Distribution of HPV genotypes according to histological abnormalities
Full size table
Fig. 7
figure 7

Multivariate logistic regression analysis of risk factors for cervical histological abnormalities. Odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals of HPV genotypes associated with abnormal cervical histology were provided. HPV16, 31, 33 and 58 were independent risk factors for the occurrence of cervical lesions. HPV16 and 18 were independent risk factors for disease progression from cervical intraepithelial neoplasia to cervical cancer

Full size image

Discussion

In May 2018, the Director-General of the World Health Organization (WHO) called for action toward achieving the global elimination of cervical cancer [18]. As cervical cancer screening has not been carried out worldwide, the prevalence of the disease is still high [19].Therefore, early screening and timely treatment, as well as expanding vaccination coverage, are the main goals to improve the current situation. Determination of the type-specific HPV prevalence and distribution in specific areas are important parts of formulating prevention and control strategies to reduce the incidence of cervical cancer.

Among the participants in this study, the 5-year total HPV positive rate was 22.3%, similar to two other surveys carried out in Zhejiang Province [15, 20]. According to an HPV epidemiological study carried out among the general population in China (1.7 million), the five most common HPV types were HPV 16, 52, 58, 18, and 33 [21]. However, this study revealed that HPV 52, 58, CP8304, 16, and 53 were the most frequent genotypes, similar to the results of a study carried out in Guangdong Province [22]. Moreover, in this study, regardless of age group, HPV 52 was the genotype with the highest infection rate, followed by HPV 16 and 58 in HR-HPV, and CP8304 in LR-HPV. CP8304 as a type of HPV which Chinese people are susceptible to; the infection rate of CP8304 exceeds several HR-HPV genotypes. However, there are few studies focused on the prevalence of CP8304 and it is worthy of attention.

Since this study included patients from both the health examination center and gynecology clinic, it is a more representative reflection of the overall HPV infection situation. We found that the overall infection rate increased during the 5-year period, which may be due to increased awareness of prevention and the popularization of HPV screening, but it is also possible that, with the development of society and economy, young people's sexual habits have changed and they are sexually active earlier and have multiple partners.

Previous studies had shown that seasonal changes strongly affect biological functions, including susceptibility to infectious, metabolic, inflammatory, and malignant diseases [23, 24]. HPV infection and HPV induced cervical epithelial dysplasia and carcinomatous change may be novel sun exposure risks in summer [25]. Sunlight data was difficult for us to collect. Since the fluency of sunlight was related to seasonal changes, we evaluated the changes in HPV infection rate in different seasons each year. We found that the infection rate was higher in spring and winter but lower in summer in Zhejiang Province, similar to the results found in Guizhou [26]. However, the infection rate was highest in spring and summer in Kunming [27], and in Wuhan [28] the infection rate in summer and winter was higher than that in spring and autumn, which suggests that region and climate are factors that affect HPV infection rate. Although we were unable to provide a scientific explanation for the prevalence in a particular season, but this suggested that the season was an intervention factor related to HPV infection, and further investigations were needed.

A large number of studies have shown that HPV infection is significantly age-specific [15, 29]. The results of this study were in line with previous literature, and the distribution of HPV infection rate showed a bimodal pattern. We discovered young women under the age of 20 had the highest infection rate, possibly because they were new to sex and their immune systems had not been sensitized, were sensitive to HPV infections [30]. They were a high-risk group for HPV, but they generally presented with temporary infections. With an increase in age, HPV infection rate decreased, and there were second peaks of infection until ages 61–70. The reason may be due to the continued existence of the virus or the reactivation of potential HPV caused by physiological and immune disorders during the transitional period of menopause [31, 32]. Therefore, implementing a vaccine program before young people may become infected with HPV can effectively reduce the HPV infection rate. In addition, the HPV infection rate in women over 60 years old is increasing, so it is recommended that the maximum age for cervical cancer screening is raised.

The age-specific prevalence curve of a single HPV infection presented a unimodal distribution, reaching a peak in the group aged 41–50; the groups ≤ 20 years and > 70 years were quite low, which was similar to the findings by Shanxi and Beijing [33, 34]. Compared with other age groups, a larger proportion of people in the ≤ 20 years of age group presented with multiple HPV infections. Sexual behavior, viral characteristics, and host susceptibility may account for the prevalence differences [35]. Whether multiple infection genotypes increase the risk of cervical lesions has yet to be concluded. Studies have shown that the existence of multiple HPV genotypes may prolong the duration of HPV infection and may increase the risk of cancer [36]. Therefore, multiple infections are more dangerous than single infections. However, studies have also shown that there may be competition or counterbalance between various types of HPV [37], which affects the role of HPV in the progression of cervical cancer without increasing its incidence. This article did not study the correlation between the two to clarify the pathogenic mechanism and it is possible that the contribution of each genotype in cervical lesions may explain this correlation.

High-risk HPV infection is a primary factor in precancerous lesions and cervical cancer. We found that the distribution of high-risk HPV genotypes is directly related to the severity of cervical cytopathology. By analyzing the cytology results of 3,912 patients, it was found that regardless of AGC, ASC-H, ASC-US, LSIL, or HSIL cytology samples, HPV 16, 58, and 52 were always the major type, with variations in rank varied, which was consistent with the data in other studies [15, 38]. Furthermore, we noticed that patients infected with HPV 16, 18, 56, 58 or 66 have an increased risk of causing abnormal cytological results. Among them, the infection rate of HPV 56 and 66 was not high, but their role in developing cervical epithelial cell abnormalities is worthy of attention.

Among the population with abnormal histological results, the distribution of HPV was also different. But, in general, similar to the cytological results, we observed that in CIN 1, 2, and 3, HPV 16, 58, and 52 were always the major type. Additionally, with the increase of the histological lesions grade, the infection rate of HPV 16 also increased, especially in cervical cancer (58.33%). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed HPV16 infection is closely associated with the severity of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and cervical cancer. Moreover, HPV 18 was also the most common oncogenic type associated with cervical cancer, which was similar to previous studies [39]. Previous studies have shown that within one or two years after the initial infection, the persistence of high-risk HPV infection is highly predictive of the lifetime risk of pre-invasive and invasive cervical tumors. HPV genotype seems to be the most important factor of persistence, among which HPV 16 and HPV 18 are the most likely to persist [39,40,41].

It is our belief that the promotion and popularization of bivalent and quadrivalent vaccines has caused a decline in the infection rate of HPV 16 and 18. However, the overall HPV infection rate is still increasing; prevention of cervical cancer still has a long way to go. Although there are currently three preventive HPV vaccines (bivalent, quadrivalent, and 9-valent) in use globally, the WHO has not given biased recommendations for these three types of vaccines [42]. With regard to the valence of the vaccine, it is not the case that more is better, only highly targeted vaccines provide effective protection [43]. China should consider both cost-effectiveness and the actual type of HPV infection when selecting a suitable vaccine. Although Gardasil 9 targets many types of HPV, there are objective reasons, such as high price, low availability, and long appointment times, which result in very limited coverage of the population. Therefore, it is recommended that development of a domestic preventive HPV vaccine with independent property rights, based on HPV 16 and 18, covering HPV 52 and 58 according to the characteristics of the female HPV epidemic in China, would achieve primary prevention of cervical cancer.

There are some limitations in this study: First, due to sampling error, operation error, or other reasons, the results of the ThinPrep cytologic test may be over-diagnosed or missed. Second, the lack of detailed information on the geographic, socio-demographic, and behavioral characteristics of the study population prevents assessment of these characteristics on the HPV infection rate. Finally, the absence of data from other areas in Zhejiang Province means that these results might not be representative of all women in Zhejiang; a larger and more representative population is recommended for future research.

Conclusion

In summary, this article analyzed the prevalence of HPV over 5 years and studied age distribution characteristics of different genotypes and single and multiple infection types. Moreover, the correlation between HPV infection and cervical lesions was also observed, which will help Zhejiang Province formulate public health policies and provide evidence for the future selection of specific HPV vaccines.

Availability of data and material

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.

Abbreviations

HPV:

Human papillomavirus

HR-HPV:

High-risk HPV

LR-HPV:

Low-risk HPV

TCT:

ThinPrep cytologic test

NILM:

Intraepithelial lesions or malignancy

AGC:

Atypical glandular cells

ASC-H:

Atypical squamous cells high-grade

ASC-US:

Atypical squamous cells, not excluding high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion

LSIL:

Low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion

HSIL:

High-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion

ICC:

And invasive cervical cancer

CIN:

Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia

HEG:

Health examination group

GCG:

Gynecological clinic group

WHO:

World Health Organization

References

  1. Bhatla N, Aoki D, Sharma DN, Sankaranarayanan R. Cancer of the cervix uteri. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2018;143(Suppl 2):22–36. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.12611.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Fowler JR, Jack BW. Cervical Cancer. 2021 Jan 6. In: StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2021

  3. Kessler TA. Cervical cancer: prevention and early detection. Semin Oncol Nurs. 2017;33(2):172–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soncn.2017.02.005.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Zhao X, Mou H. Analysis of the results of genetic screening of 10 226 cases of female human papillomavirus. Mod Med Health (in Chinese). 2021;37(03):462–5.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68(6):394–424. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21492.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hao S, Wang C, Liu S, He J, Jiang Y. HPV genotypic spectrum in Jilin province, China, where non-vaccine-covered HPV53 and 51 are prevalent, exhibits a bimodal age-specific pattern. PLoS ONE. 2020;15(3): e0230640. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0230640.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Markowitz LE, Naleway AL, Klein NP, Lewis RM, Crane B, Querec TD, et al. Human papillomavirus vaccine effectiveness against HPV infection: evaluation of one, two, and three doses. J Infect Dis. 2020;221(6):910–8. https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/jiz555.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Spinner C, Ding L, Bernstein DI, Brown DR, Franco EL, Covert C, et al. Human papillomavirus vaccine effectiveness and herd protection in young women. Pediatrics. 2019;143(2): e20181902. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2018-1902.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lei J, Ploner A, Elfström KM, Wang J, Roth A, Fang F, et al. HPV vaccination and the risk of invasive cervical cancer. N Engl J Med. 2020;383(14):1340–8. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1917338.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Wang R, Pan W, Jin L, Huang W, Li Y, Wu D, et al. Human papillomavirus vaccine against cervical cancer: Opportunity and challenge. Cancer Lett. 2020;28(471):88–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.canlet.2019.11.039.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Wang Y, Meng Y, Li W, Zhang X, Deng Z, Hu M, et al. Prevalence and characteristics of hrHPV infection among 414,540 women: a multicenter study in Central and Eastern China. J Cancer. 2019;10(8):1902–8. https://doi.org/10.7150/jca.30157.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Wang R, Guo XL, Wisman GB, Schuuring E, Wang WF, Zeng ZY, et al. Nationwide prevalence of human papillomavirus infection and viral genotype distribution in 37 cities in China. BMC Infect Dis. 2015;15:257. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-015-0998-5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Lu W, Chen T, Yao Y, Chen P. Prevalence of high-risk human papillomavirus and cervical lesion risk factors: a population-based study in Zhejiang, China 2010–2019. J Med Virol. 2021;93(8):5118–25. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmv.27034.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Xing J, Tan T, Guo YL, Zhu JQ, Zheng AW, Yu AJ, et al. Heat maps present the spatial distribution of human papillomavirus infection in Zhejiang Province, China. Oncol Lett. 2021;21(5):366. https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2021.12627.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Liu XX, Fan XL, Yu YP, Ji L, Yan J, Sun AH. Human papillomavirus prevalence and type-distribution among women in Zhejiang Province, Southeast China: a cross-sectional study. BMC Infect Dis. 2014;19(14):708. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-014-0708-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Muñoz N, Bosch FX, de Sanjosé S, Herrero R, Castellsagué X, Shah KV, et al. International agency for research on cancer multicenter cervical cancer study group. Epidemiologic classification of human papillomavirus types associated with cervical cancer. N Engl J Med. 2003;348(6):518–27. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa021641.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Solomon D, Davey D, Kurman R, Moriarty A, O’Connor D, Prey M, et al. The 2001 Bethesda system: terminology for reporting results of cervical cytology. JAMA. 2002;287(16):2114–9. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.287.16.2114.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Canfell K. Towards the global elimination of cervical cancer. Papillomavirus Res. 2019;8: 100170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pvr.2019.100170.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Pimple SA, Mishra GA. Global strategies for cervical cancer prevention and screening. Minerva Ginecol. 2019;71(4):313–20. https://doi.org/10.23736/S0026-4784.19.04397-1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Qian L, Zhang Y, Cui D, Lou B, Chen Y, Yu Y, et al. Analysis of epidemiological trends in human papillomavirus infection among gynaecological outpatients in Hangzhou, China, 2011–2015. BMC Infect Dis. 2017;17(1):393. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-017-2498-2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Wu EQ, Liu B, Cui JF, Chen W, Wang JB, Lu L, et al. Prevalence of type-specific human papillomavirus and pap results in Chinese women: a multi-center, population-based cross-sectional study. Cancer Causes Control. 2013;24(4):795–803. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-013-0162-8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Luo G, Sun X, Li M, Liu T, Hu G, He Y, et al. Cervical human papillomavirus among women in Guangdong, China 2008–2017: implication for screening and vaccination. J Med Virol. 2019;91(10):1856–65. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmv.25520.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Touitou Y, Haus E. Biologic rhythms in clinical and laboratory medicine. Berlin: Springer; 1992.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  24. Reinberg A, Smolensky MH. Biological rhythms and medicine. Berlin: Springer; 1983. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-9496-9.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  25. Hrushesky WJ, Sothern RB, Rietveld WJ, Du Quiton J, Boon ME. Season, sun, sex, and cervical cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2005;14(8):1940–7. https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-04-0940.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Chen Z, Li Q, Huang Q, Liu H, Jiang H, Chen Z, et al. Characteristics of human papillomaviruses distribution in Guizhou Province, China. Virol J. 2019;16(1):123. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12985-019-1239-0.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Sheng Z, Lingjia L, Yang W, Chuanmei P, Wanting C, Bo W, et al. Human papillomavirus detection and genotype distribution of suspected outpatients. Chin J Dermatovenereol (in Chinese). 2016;10:1033–6. https://doi.org/10.13735/j.cjdv.1001-7089.201603165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Xiang F, Guan Q, Liu X, Xiao H, Xia Q, Liu X, et al. Distribution characteristics of different human papillomavirus genotypes in women in Wuhan, China. J Clin Lab Anal. 2018;32(8): e22581. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcla.22581.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Chen X, Xu H, Xu W, Zeng W, Liu J, Wu Q, et al. Prevalence and genotype distribution of human papillomavirus in 961,029 screening tests in southeastern China (Zhejiang Province) between 2011 and 2015. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):14813. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-13299-y.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Jiang L, Tian X, Peng D, Zhang L, Xie F, Bi C, et al. HPV prevalence and genotype distribution among women in Shandong Province, China: analysis of 94,489 HPV genotyping results from Shandong’s largest independent pathology laboratory. PLoS ONE. 2019;14(1): e0210311. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0210311.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Kang LN, Castle PE, Zhao FH, Jeronimo J, Chen F, Bansil P, et al. A prospective study of age trends of high-risk human papillomavirus infection in rural China. BMC Infect Dis. 2014;14:96. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-14-96.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Althoff KN, Paul P, Burke AE, Viscidi R, Sangaramoorthy M, Gravitt PE. Correlates of cervicovaginal human papillomavirus detection in perimenopausal women. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2009;18(9):1341–6. https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2008.1223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Wang Y, Juanhua Du, Li Y, Li J, Yuan R, Nan X. Age distribution of HPV infection and genotyping among females in Yan’an, Shaanxi Province. Chin J Cancer Prevent Treat (in Chinese). 2017;24(11):729–33.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Li M, Du X, Lu M, Zhang W, Sun Z, Li L, et al. Prevalence characteristics of single and multiple HPV infections in women with cervical cancer and precancerous lesions in Beijing. China J Med Virol. 2019;91(3):473–81. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmv.25331.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Tang Y, Zheng L, Yang S, Li B, Su H, Zhang LP. Epidemiology and genotype distribution of human papillomavirus (HPV) in Southwest China: a cross-sectional five years study in non-vaccinated women. Virol J. 2017;14(1):84. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12985-017-0751-3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Schmitt M, Depuydt C, Benoy I, Bogers J, Antoine J, Arbyn M, et al. Multiple human papillomavirus infections with high viral loads are associated with cervical lesions but do not differentiate grades of cervical abnormalities. J Clin Microbiol. 2013;51:1458–64. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.00087-13.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Bernard E, Pons-Salort M, Favre M, Heard I, Delarocque-Astagneau E, Guillemot D, et al. Comparing human papillomavirus prevalences in women with normal cytology or invasive cervical cancer to rank genotypes according to their oncogenic potential: a meta-analysis of observational studies. BMC Infect Dis. 2013;13:373. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-13-373.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Luo Q, Jiang N, Wu Q, Wang J, Zhong J. Prevalence and genotype distribution of HPV and cervical pathological results in Sichuan Province, China: a three years surveys prior to mass HPV vaccination. Virol J. 2020;17(1):100. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12985-020-01366-2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Banura C, Mirembe FM, Katahoire AR, Namujju PB, Mbonye AK, Wabwire FM. Epidemiology of HPV genotypes in Uganda and the role of the current preventive vaccines: a systematic review. Infect Agent Cancer. 2011;6(1):11. https://doi.org/10.1186/1750-9378-6-11.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Goodman A. HPV testing as a screen for cervical cancer. BMJ. 2015;30(350): h2372. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.h2372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Laabidi B, Ben Rejeb S, Bani A, Mansouri N, Lamine O, Bouzaini A, et al. Human papillomavirus detection using in situ hybridization and correlations with histological and cytological findings. Med Mal Infect. 2016;46(7):380–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medmal.2016.07.001.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. World Health Organization. Human papillomavirus vaccines: WHO position paper, May 2017-recommendations. Vaccine. 2017;35(43):5753–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2017.05.069.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Crowe E, Pandeya N, Brotherton JM, Dobson AJ, Kisely S, Lambert SB, et al. Effectiveness of quadrivalent human papillomavirus vaccine for the prevention of cervical abnormalities: case-control study nested within a population based screening programme in Australia. BMJ. 2014;348: g1458. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g1458.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 81802081). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Clinical Laboratory, Stomatology Hospital, School of Stomatology, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Clinical Research Center for Oral Biomedical Research of Zhejiang Province, Cancer Center of Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China

    Xiaotian Yan & Yun Qian

  2. Department of Clinical Laboratory, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China

    Lingwei Shen, Yufei Xiao & Qi Wang

  3. Shanghai Upper Bio Tech Pharma Company Limited, Shanghai, China

    Fugang Li

Authors
  1. Xiaotian Yan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Lingwei Shen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yufei Xiao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Qi Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Fugang Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Yun Qian
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

X.T.Y. and L.W.S. worked on data analysis and interpretation. X.T.Y. and Y.F.X. drafted the manuscript. Q.W. and F.G.L collected patient clinical information. Y.Q. designed the study. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yun Qian.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study followed the ethical guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by Ethics Committee of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine.

Consent to publication

All of the patients signed an informed consent form.

Competing interests

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yan, X., Shen, L., Xiao, Y. et al. Prevalence, characteristics, and distribution of HPV genotypes in women from Zhejiang Province, 2016–2020. Virol J 18, 208 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12985-021-01676-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12985-021-01676-z

Keywords

Virology Journal

ISSN: 1743-422X