Open Access

Three novel bacteriophages isolated from the East African Rift Valley soda lakes

  • Leonardo Joaquim van Zyl1Email author,
  • Shonisani Nemavhulani1,
  • James Cass1,
  • Donald Arthur Cowan1, 2 and
  • Marla Trindade1
Virology Journal201613:204

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12985-016-0656-6

Received: 29 September 2016

Accepted: 21 November 2016

Published: 3 December 2016

Abstract

Background

Soda lakes are unique environments in terms of their physical characteristics and the biology they harbour. Although well studied with respect to their microbial composition, their viral compositions have not, and consequently few bacteriophages that infect bacteria from haloalkaline environments have been described.

Methods

Bacteria were isolated from sediment samples of lakes Magadi and Shala. Three phages were isolated on two different Bacillus species and one Paracoccus species using agar overlays. The growth characteristics of each phage in its host was investigated and the genome sequences determined and analysed by comparison with known phages.

Results

Phage Shbh1 belongs to the family Myoviridae while Mgbh1 and Shpa belong to the Siphoviridae family. Tetranucleotide usage frequencies and G + C content suggests that Shbh1 and Mgbh1 do not regularly infect, and have therefore not evolved with, the hosts they were isolated on here. Shbh1 was shown capable of infecting two different Bacillus species from the two different lakes demonstrating its potential broad-host range. Comparative analysis of their genome sequence with known phages revealed that, although novel, Shbh1 does share substantial amino acid similarity with previously described Bacillus infecting phages (Grass, phiNIT1 and phiAGATE) and belongs to the Bastille group, while Mgbh1 and Shpa are highly novel.

Conclusion

The addition of these phages to current databases should help with metagenome/metavirome annotation efforts. We describe a highly novel Paracoccus infecting virus (Shpa) which together with NgoΦ6 and vB_PmaS_IMEP1 is one of only three phages known to infect Paracoccus species but does not show similarity to these phages.

Keywords

Soda Lake Bacteriophage Myoviridae Siphoviridae Paracoccus

Background

Soda lakes are sodium carbonate (Na2CO3)-dominated environments with varying salinity and high pH values, usually between 9 and 11, but occasionally greater than pH 12 [13]. These lakes are found in arid and semi-arid areas where high evaporation rates facilitate the accumulation of salts in local depressions and due to the high buffering capacity of sodium carbonate, soda lakes are the only habitats that maintain stable high alkalinity [46]. The best studied lakes are those of the East African Rift Valley (EARV) which have been scientifically documented for many decades, two of which, Lake Shala (LS) and Lake Magadi (LM) are located in Ethiopia and Kenya respectively [711]. The EARV lakes are situated in an environment of active volcanism and differ from other soda lakes as surrounding hot springs supply water to the lake depressions, whereas others are supplied by the leaching of rainfall through the surface into the lake basins [3].

Soda lakes are the most biologically productive non-marine aquatic environments known [10, 12] and although the microbial composition of these lakes has been well studied [11, 1316], little is known about their viral populations [17, 18]. It is now accepted that bacteriophages (phages) are the most abundant biological entities in most ecosystems and soda lakes are no exception, with studies conducted on Mono Lake placing viral abundance at 109 ml-1, among the highest in natural aquatic environments [19]. Although much is known about phages that infect certain groups of microorganisms (Mycobacterium, Staphylococcus, Escherichia, Pseudomonas and Lactococcus), much work is needed to expand on our knowledge of phages infecting other hosts [20, 21]. The impact that phages have on higher trophic levels is also becoming clearer as elegantly demonstrated using a soda lake environment as model [22, 23]. Although this study was a demonstration of the direct effect phage infection can have on a bacterial population and higher trophic structures, they are also thought to shape populations through genetic exchange [24, 25] and by so doing affect the biogeochemical cycles present. The study of phages from these environments has also highlighted some unique viruses such as ΦCh1, an archaeal virus which carries both DNA and RNA [26]. Therefore, there is a need to better understand the viral composition in these, and other environments.

Here, we describe phages that infect Bacillus- and Paracoccus species. Several studies have highlighted the importance of these microbes in biogeochemical cycling in soda lakes [27]. The Firmicutes make up a substantial portion (11%) of the microbial community in Lonar Lake and Bacillus species, together with Methylomicrobium and Methylophaga species, and were shown to be the dominant methylotrophs in this Lake [28]. They’ve also been shown to be responsible for metal speciation and mobilization of arsenic in Mono Lake [29] while some members of the Firmicutes such as Bacillus alkalidiazotrophicus, play a role in the nitrogen cycle [30]. Rhodobacteraceae in turn were shown to be one of the dominant families in many soda lakes (Bogoria, Lonar, Zabuye and Kauhako), and the most diverse Family in Ethiopian soda lakes [16]. In particular, Paracoccus species (family Rhodobacteraceae) have been identified as part of the denitrifying community [29]. Although several prophages have been identified in Paracoccus species’ genomes, only two phages (NgoΦ6 and vB_PmaS_IMEP1), are known to infect Paracoccus species [31]. Thus, to better understand the diversity and biology of bacteriophages and their potential effects on their hosts, in particular from haloalkaline environments, we isolated and characterized three phages from EARV soda lakes including a novel phage infecting a Paracoccus species.

Methods

Sampling, Bacterial isolation and culturing

Medium A (broth and agar) was used for bacterial isolation and culturing [32]. Medium A broth contained 1% of glucose, 0.5% of peptone, 0.5% of yeast extract, 5% of NaCl, 0.1% of K2HPO4 and 0.02% of MgSO4.7H2O. Medium A agar was prepared from medium A broth with the addition of 1.5% of bacteriological agar. Soft agar used in plaque assay required 0.75% of bacteriological agar. All components were dissolved in water and then adjusted to pH9 using 10 N NaOH. Unless stated otherwise, all strains were cultured at 37 °C. Bacteria were isolated for this study from soil sediments of both LM and LS stored at 4 °C. Ten grams of sediment from each sample were suspended in 100 ml of medium A broth and diluted 10 fold with water. One hundred microlitre volumes of each dilution were spread on medium A agar plates, which were incubated for 24 h at 37 °C. After visual inspection of bacterial isolates for varying colony morphologies, colonies were picked from each plate. Bacterial strains were stored in medium A broth containing 50% glycerol at -80 °C until required. Isolates ERV9 and HS3, which are part of the IMBM strain collection, were previously isolated from LS sediment on medium A adjusted to pH9. One gram of soil from each site was serially diluted in 1 × PBS (phosphate buffered saline) and dilutions (10-2–10-7) were plated. Plates were incubated for 8–10 weeks at 37 °C.

Phage isolation and assays

Fifty grams of each soil sediment was mixed with 100 ml of medium A broth and incubated at 37 °C on a shaking platform at 120 rpm for 24 h. Fifty millilitre aliquots were removed and centrifuged at 5000 × g for 15 min. The suspensions were filtered first through a 0.45 μm, followed by 0.22 μm syringe filter. The filtrates were used for phage-host infection test plaque assays [33] using two-layer agar plates. The soft agar layer contained 100 μl of mid-log cultures of the newly isolated bacteria mixed with 100 μl of filtrate. Plates were incubated at 37 °C for 24 h. A single plaque was picked using a sterile 1 ml pipette tip and sub-cultured using the same host strain. This phage purification process was repeated 3 times. After phage purification, phage stocks were stored in medium A containing 50% glycerol at -80 °C for long term storage.

One step growth curves were determined as described by [34] with slight modification. Bacterial host strains were cultured overnight in 5 ml of medium A broth at 37 °C at 120 rpm on a shaking platform. Two hundred microliters of each overnight culture was inoculated in 50 ml of medium A broth and incubated at 37 °C at 120 rpm on a shaking platform until the cell density of the cultures reached approximately 1x108 CFU/ml. One millilitre aliquots of each bacterial culture were mixed in microfuge tubes with 0.1 multiplicity of infection (MOI) (MOI = Plaque forming units (pfu) of virus used for infection/number of cells) of phage, in triplicate, and incubated at 37 °C at 120 rpm on a shaking platform for 10 min allowing the phage to adsorb to the bacterial host. Cells were centrifuged at 6000 × g for 10 min to remove the unadsorbed phage. Supernatants were removed and the pellets were resuspended in 1 ml of medium A broth. Fifty microliters of the resuspended cultures were transferred to 50 ml of medium A and mixed well. A one millilitre aliquot of each culture was transferred into a microfuge tube (time was noted as T = 0) and the rest (±49 ml) of the triplicate cultures were incubated at 37 °C with aeration (120 rpm) on a shaking platform. Samples were taken every 30 min for 6.5 h. Plaque forming units (PFU) were determined by the plaque assay.

Phages were prepared for TEM visualization as previously described [35]. Phage lysates (10 ml) were centrifuged at 25,000 × g for 1 h in an Eppendorf 5417R centrifuge. Supernatants were discarded and the pellets were suspended in 1 ml of 0.1 M ammonium acetate solution, then incubated at 37 °C at 120 rpm on a shaking platform for 16 h to allow the phage pellets to resuspend. Centrifugation and resuspension steps were repeated twice. Each phage suspension was resuspended in a final volume of 20 μl 0.1 M ammonium acetate after the last washing step. TEM images were taken with an FEI Tecnai F20 Field Emission Gun operated at 200 kV at the University of Cape Town’s Electron Microscopy Unit. Two microliters of each phage suspension were placed onto a carbon coated copper grid (200 mesh), washed with distilled water and stained with 2% uranyl acetate. The samples were observed at 50 000 X magnification.

DNA extraction, PCR and sequence analysis

Approximately 100 ml of phage lysate was filter sterilized using 0.45 μm followed by 0.22 μm syringe filters. This was followed by addition of 7.5 ml 20% (wt/vol) PEG8000 to every 30 ml of phage lysate and overnight storage at 4 °C. Phage lysates were centrifuged at 13,000 × g for 30 min. The supernatants were discarded and the pellets resuspended in 1 ml SM buffer. SM buffer was prepared using 20 ml of 5 M NaCl, 8.5 ml of 1 M MgSO4, 50 ml of Tris-HCl (pH 7.5) and 10 ml of 1% gelatin solution. A 5 μl volume of DNAseI at 1 mg/ml and 5 μl of RNAseA at 12.5 mg/ml concentration were added to 1 ml volume of phage suspensions in SM buffer to remove bacterial DNA and RNA. The reactions were incubated at 37 °C for 30 min. Following the addition of 10 μl of Proteinase K at 10 mg/ml and 20 μl of 20% SDS, the reactions were incubated at 55 °C for 1 h to allow for the disruption of the phage capsids. Phenol/chloroform DNA extraction was used to extract phage DNA. An equal volume of phenol:chloroform:isoamyl alcohol (25:24:1) was added to the supernatants, and the reactions were centrifuged at 13,000 × g for 5 min. The upper layer was transferred to new tubes, and the process of adding phenol:chloroform:isoamyl alcohol, centrifugation and removal of the upper layer was repeated. An equal volume of chloroform:isoamyl alcohol (24:1) was mixed with the upper layer containing the sample and centrifuged. The upper layer was transferred into 1.5 ml eppendorf tubes. A 45 μl volume of 3 M sodium acetate (pH5.2) and a 500 μl of 100% isopropanol were added, and the solution was incubated overnight at -20 °C to precipitate the DNA. The pellet was collected by centrifugation at 14,000 rpm for 20 min. The DNA pellet was washed twice using 1 ml of 70% ethanol. The DNA pellet was air dried at room temperature, resuspended in 30 μl of 1 X TE buffer and stored at -20 °C.

The 16S rRNA gene amplification was carried out using universal bacterial primers E9F 5’-GAGTTTGATCCTGGCTCAG-3’ [36] and U1510R 5’-GGTTACCTTGTTACGACTT-3’ [37] to identify bacterial isolates. The PCR mix included 5 μl of 10X DreamTaq buffer, 5 μl of 2 mM dNTPs, 2 μl of both 1 mM forward and reverse primers, 100 ng of DNA and 1.25 U DreamTaq Polymerase. Each reaction was adjusted to a final volume of 50 μl with nuclease free water and amplified in an automated thermal cycler (Thermo Hybaid). The PCR conditions were: initial denaturation at 95 °C for 3 min, followed by 35 cycles of denaturation at 95 °C for 30s, annealing at 55 °C for 30s and extension at 72 °C for 1 min, with a final extension at 72 °C for 10 min. DNA fragments of approximately 1500 bp were generated and visualised by electrophoresis on a 1% agarose gel.

Sanger sequencing was performed using an ABI PRISM® 377 automated DNA sequencer at the Central Analytical Facility of the University of Stellenbosch (South Africa). For 16S rRNA sequencing, primers E9F and U1510R were used. Next generation sequencing was performed using an Illumina MiSeq sequencer using the Nextera XT library preparation kit (Illumina) and a 10% phiX v3 spike as per the manufacturer’s instructions (Preparation Guide, Part #15031942 Rev A May 2012) as well as the MiSeq Reagent kit V2 (500 cycle). One nanogram of uncloned, unamplified viral DNA was used to prepare one Nextera XT library with each phage barcoded for de-multiplexing after sequencing. Sequencing was performed at the Institute for Microbial Biotechnology and Metagenomics (IMBM), University of the Western Cape, Cape Town, South Africa. The raw reads were trimmed (bases with a Q-score less than 36 were trimmed from the 3’end) and de-multiplexed at the sequencing facility generating 2 × 250 bp reads, resulting in a set of paired (read pairs, forward and reverse) fastq files per phage.

Sequences were analysed using BioEdit Version 7.0 software and DNAMAN Version 4.13. The NCBI database was used for analysis of DNA sequences and homology searches. The Basic Local Alignment Search Tools (BLAST) programme was used to determine sequence similarity and identity to known sequences in the GenBank database using software from the National Centre for Biotechnology Information (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/). De novo assembly of phage genomes was performed using CLC genomics workbench ver. 6.5 (CLC bio, Denmark). Annotation of phage genomes was performed by manual BLASTp searches of ORFs predicted by CLC as well as BLASTx searches for regions in which no ORFs were predicted. The complete genome sequence of all three phages is available on the GenBank database under accession numbers KR072689 (Shpa), KU640380 (Shbh1) and KU665491 (Mgbh1).

The software program TETRA was used to perform tetranucleotide usage deviation analysis [38, 39]. tRNA genes were predicted using the tRNAscan-SE program (http://tinyurl.com/snbk2). Direct repeats were identified using REPFIND (http://tinyurl.com/zkh2pnc) with a 15 bp minimum repeat length. Inverted repeats were identified using UGENE (http://ugene.unipro.ru) using 20 bp minimum and 80% similarity as search parameters. Codon usage data for P. denitrificans was obtained from (http://tinyurl.com/zeqorau). Transmembrane regions were predicted using the TMHMM server (http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/TMHMM). Protein repeats were identified using the RADAR server (http://tinyurl.com/pcpves3). CRISPR sequences were identified through BLAST searches using the full length genome sequence against the CRSIPR database (http://crispr.u-psud.fr). The phylogenetic tree for terminase sequences from various phages and bacteria was created using MEGA6 [40]. All positions with less than 95% site coverage were eliminated. That is, fewer than 5% alignment gaps, missing data, and ambiguous bases were allowed at any position. There was a total of 239 positions in the final dataset.

Results and Discussion

Isolation of phages and basic characterization

Seven bacterial isolates (Table 1) from the IMBM culture collection, previously isolated from LS and LM were used to screen for phages. On challenging the isolates with sediment from both lakes clear plaques were produced on isolate HS3 with LS sediment and isolate MGK1 showed clear plaque formation with sediment from both lakes. Following single plaque purification, three distinct phages were identified and named Mgbh1 (MGK1—LM sediment; clear plaques), Shbh1 (MGK1—LS sediment; clear plaques) and Shpa (HS3—LS sediment; clear plaques). The phages were tested for their ability to infect the seven bacterial isolates from both lakes. Mgbh1 and Shbh1 infected MGK1. Shbh1 can additionally infect isolate ERV9 forming turbid plaques with characteristic “bulls eye” morphology, whereas Shpa could only infect HS3. This suggests that Shbh1 could be a broad-host range phage which promotes genetic exchange between hosts. “Bulls eye” plaques on ERV9 also suggests lysogeny of the host whereas it may be lytic on MGK1.
Table 1

Bacterial strains employed for phage isolation

Strain (Lake Source)

pH, NaCl % (wt/vol)

Closest 16S rRNA BLAST hit (sequence length bp/%)

Phage That Infects

Shala1 (Shala)

9, 8

Halomonas axialensis (1395/98)

-

Shala2 (Shala)

9, 7

Bacillus licheniformis (1422/99)

-

Shala3 (Shala)

9, 7

Virgibacillus salarius (1426/99)

-

Shala4 (Shala)

9, 8

Halomonas venusta (1378/99)

-

MGK1 (Magadi)

9, 6

Bacillus halodurans C-125 (1398/97)

Mgbh1, Shbh1

ERV9 (Shala)

9, 6

Bacillus pseudofirmus OF4 (1414/99)

Shbh1

HS3 (Shala)

10, 6

Paracoccus marinus (1399/97)

Shpa

Phage preparations from all four isolations were visualized by TEM. Morphologically Shbh1 belongs to the family Myoviridae while Mgbh1 and Shpa belong to the family Siphoviridae (Table 2).
Table 2

Summary of phage characterization data including bright field TEM images of phages. The scale bar is 100 nm in length

Phage source

Host

Bacteriophage

Genome size (bp)

Phage family

TEM image

No. of ORFs

G + C content (%)

Dimensions (nm)

Burst size per cell

Eclipse (h)

Latent period (h)

Rise time (h)

Approximate head diameter

Approximate tail length

LM

MGK1

Mgbh1

58951

Siphoviridae

80

45.4

49

200

882

1

4

3

LS

MGK1

Shbh1

138081

Myoviridae

178

36.4

92

226

1550

0.5

3.5

3

ERV9

Shbh1

138081

Myoviridae

178

36.4

92

226

106

1

3.5

2.5

LS

HS3

Shpa

38261

Siphoviridae

56

64.7

37

200

1722

0.5

4

3.5

One step growth curve data showed that Mgbh1, Shpa and Shbh1 (with MGK1 as host), had large burst sizes producing >800 particles per cell (Fig. 1 and Table 2). Shbh1 had a much smaller burst size when using ERV9 as host, which it likely lysogenizes and could explain the reduced burst size. It is noteworthy that none of the phages displayed a particularly acute burst, but rather a burst drawn out over 2.5 to 3 h and suggests that phage release from single infected cells could be asynchronous [41, 42]. Turbid or clear plaques for Shbh1 on the two different hosts, could be the result of different transcription/translation rates as cultures grew at more or less the same rate according to their growth curves (not shown). This could be influenced by the growth conditions used (37 °C and a fixed salt concentration and medium composition). As only one set of conditions was employed, the phage may behave differently in the two hosts.
Fig. 1

One step growth curves of phages Shpa (✖) Mgbh1 (♦) Shbh1 on MGK1 () and Shbh1 on ERV9 (■)

Phage genomes

Genome composition and phylogeny

The phage genomes varied in size ranging from 58.9 kb to 138 kb (Table 2). The phage genomes all display the modular arrangement well documented in other phages from these families (Fig. 2). Shpa shares little overall nucleotide similarity with any phage on the NCBInr database with the highest identity being to small portions (38–394 bp at 75 to 92%) of Paracoccus, Rhodobacter and Rhizobium species’ genomes. More distantly related is a section (±2.8 kb at 67% identity; 2576–5387 bp), encoding the major capsid protein and a protease, to the Silicibacter species TM1040 genome (CP000377.1). This region of the Silicibacter species genome encodes a putative prophage. The phage genomes appear to be compact, with only 9%, 12% and 13% non-coding regions in Shpa, Mgbh1, and Shbh1 respectively.
Fig. 2

Genomic arrangement of Shpa (a), Mgbh1 (b) and Shbh1 (c). Blue boxes indicate modular areas

Mgbh1 shares a region of ±3 kb (49269–52282 bp at 67% identity) with the Bacillus subtilis subspecies spizizenii W23 genome (CP002183.1) and much shorter sections (29–64 bp at 100%) with the B. halodurans C-125 genome sequence (BA000004.3). The ±3 kb area encodes the ribonucleotide reductase subunits and the nucleotide similarity is likely due to the flanking genomic region coding for a prophage as well as the need to conserve RNR function and regulation [43]. Shbh1 does share significant nucleotide similarity with well-known Bacillus species Myovirus phages namely SIOphi (70% identity over 32% of the genome), phiNIT1, phage Grass and to a lesser extent the more recently described phage, phiAGATE [44, 45]. Neither Mgbh1 nor Shbh1 appears closely related to the only other sequenced alkaliphic Bacillus infecting phage BCJA1c [46] with only one open reading frame (ORF31 on Mgbh1) showing highest sequence identity to a homologue on that phage genome. The genome sequence of two Idiomarinaceae infecting phages Phi1M2-2 (NC_025471; 36844 bp) and 1 N2-2 (NC_025439; 34773 bp), isolated from LM, has been determined. However, none of the phages described here show similarity at the nucleotide or amino acid level to these viruses. Nucleotide sequence alignment of Shbh1 with several of its closest relatives show some conservation at the nucleotide level (Additional file 1: Figure S1). Notably, the first ±45000 bp shows little similarity to any of its relatives, with the exception of a block from ±10000 bp to ±17000 bp which contains a SpoEIII homolog. It also shares some similarity to the ORFs encoding structural proteins in related phages. However, there are four regions that show little or no homology to the structural proteins of closely related phages: 75678–76596 bp, 82861–86954 bp, 91464–95056 bp, 98815–102490 bp. The first of these regions lies in the tail tape measure protein, and likely reflects the differences in tail length between Shbh1 and its relatives. The other three regions occur in a region coding for putative tail fiber proteins and two other tail proteins without defined function. These difference may reflect that a unique cellular feature is targeted by the phage for binding to the host or may reflect the adaptation to a haloalkaline environment.

The G + C content of Shpa is in the same range as for its host (Paracoccus species G + C range 63.4–70.4%), while the G + C content for Shbh1 is slightly lower than for B. halodurans (43.7%) or B. pseudofirmus (40.3%) which is often observed for phage-host pairs [47]. In the case of Mgbh1 the G + C content is slightly above that of its host, B. halodurans. On average it is found that phages have a G + C content 4% lower than their hosts [47], with fewer examples of phage with G + C content higher than their host. Deviation in G + C content between phages and their hosts has been used to indicate that the phage does not regularly infect, or has evolved in a particular host, as G + C content tends to ameliorate over time between phages and their hosts [48, 49]. This, together with the potential broad-host range nature of the phage suggests that Shbh1 may not prefer infecting in situ the hosts on which it was isolated here. While other factors such as the availability of a suitable attB site and regulation of gene expression will play a part in whether or not the phage is lytic or lysogenic on a particular host, it is worth noting that the G + C difference for Shbh1 compared with B. halodurans is greater than between Shbh1 and B. pseudofirmus. This agrees with the observation of Rocha that lytic phages are often higher in AT content than lysogenic phage compared with the host. Tetranucleotide usage deviation (TUD) analysis gave a value of 0.64 when comparing Shbh1 to both host genomes (B. halodurans and B. pseudofirmus). The correlation coefficient was 0.65 when comparing Shbh1 and Mgbh1 to each other. The TUD value was 0.46 when comparing the Mgbh1 genome to that of MGK1. This lower TUD correlation perhaps together with a slightly higher G + C content, for Mgbh1, could suggest that the host used here may not be the host that this phage has regularly infected or has co-evolved with for a long time. TUD analysis gave a Pearson’s correlation coefficient of 0.74 and 0.69 when comparing Shpa to the two sequenced Paracoccus genomes.

The terminase large subunit identified on Mgbh1 shows highest similarity to proteins from Bacillus (phBC6A51) and Paenibacillus (Tripp) phages (Fig. 3 and Additional file 2: Table S1) when performing a BLASTp search against only Caudovirales sequences on the NCBI database. However, it is most closely related to many terminase sequences found in genome sequences of a variety of Bacillus species when searching against the NCBInr database and Metavir classification identifies Bacillus subtilis phage Grass as the closest relative. This would suggest that Mgbh1 is related to Bacillus prophages rather than lytic phages which infect these hosts. It may also point to the large amount of information missing from current databases, and the biological relationship described should help to more accurately describe the phylogeny of many unknown phages.
Fig. 3

A condensed (50% cutoff) neighbor-joining tree of 117 large terminase subunit amino acid sequences from tailed phages and bacteria. The percentage of replicate trees in which the associated taxa clustered together in the bootstrap test (1000 replicates) is shown next to the branches [70, 71]. The names of the phages or bacterial sequences are shown at the right of each branch. Coloured boxes demarcate related groups of terminases with similar packaging strategies. Accession numbers for aligned sequences are: Bcp1 - YP_009031337; Bth - WP_063675351; phBC6A51 - NP_852525; Grass - YP_008771417; phiNIT1 - YP_008318309; Oceanibulbis- KZY05261; vB_PmaS_IMEP1 - YP_009126425; eHP-41 - AFH23043; ECBP1 - YP_006908844; RcapMu - YP_004934675; Kpn - WP_048270899; Rhsp - WP_011840500; Tripp - YP_009210523; Bsu - CUB50907; G1 - YP_240892; Mater - YP_009151157; Mcat18 - AKI27764; SfV - NP_599034; Phi1 - ALY08144; Cd - YP_001686870; Phi1M2-2 - AIM40760; 1 N2-2 - AIM40704; eHP30 - AFH22611; S20 - YP_007673310; ES18 - YP_224140; phiHSIC - YP_224236; HK620 - NP_112076; APSE-1 - NP_050979; LL-H - YP_001285878; phig1e - NP_695170; Lj965 - NP_958579; O1205 - NP_695104; phiETA - NP_510934; P22 - AAA72959; T3 - NP_523347; phiA1122 - NP_848309; gh-1 - NP_813786; PP03 - WP_010953264; phiKMV - NP_877482; SP6 - NP_853601; Tum2 - WP_035256432; Cc1 - NP_421586; RadMu - NP_285417; FluMu - P44224; Bruc1 - AAL52531; RhodoGTA - AAF13179; phiKO2 - YP_006582; PY54 - NP_892047; ST64B - NP_700375; phiP27 - NP_543088; phiE125 - NP_536358; HK97 - NP_037698; A2 - NP_680484; Sfi19 - NP_049926; BK5-T - NP_116494; phiadh - CAB52518; P008 - AAY97804; biL170 - AAC27181; biL67 - NP_042313; Xp10 - NP_858953; phiC31 - NP_047924; phiBT1 - NP_813693; L5 - NP_039677; D29 - NP_046828; Bcep22 - NP_944278; T4 - NP_049776; RB49 - NP_891724; Aeh1 - NP_944105; KVP40 - NP_899601; phiCTX - NP_490600; P2 - NP_046758; L-413c - NP_839851; 186 - NP_052251; Fels-2 - YP_001718747; HP1 - NP_043485; K139 - NP_536648; 933 W - ; Mu - NP_050632; SP18 - YP_003934803; TP901-1 - NP_112694; Lambda - NP_040581; N15 - NP_046897; WO - BAA89640; Gifsy-1 - YP_001700612; Gifsy-2 - YP_001700675; Fels-1 - YP_001700563; vB_PaeS_PMG1 - YP_005098205; PsymV2 - YP_009017589; Shpa - AKG94514; Shbh1 - AMQ66579; Mgbh1 - AMQ66673; Basilisk - AGR46580; SPO1 - YP_002300330; PBC1 - YP_006383455; EEOGHAN - YP_007517399; FINN - YP_007517630; ANDROMEDA - YP_007517474; CURLY - YP_007517553; BCJA1c - YP_164412; IEBH - YP_002154374; CHERRY - ABA46388; phi105 - ADF59135; BtCS33 - YP_006488672; GVE2 - YP_001285808; Slash - YP_008771935; Staley - YP_008770747; D-1873 - EES90358; vB_BanS_Tsamsa - YP_008873483; 949 - YP_004306307; SpBc2 - NP_046608; c-st - YP_398598; phiMHa1 - YP_655470; M42548 - AGK02301; SPP1 - NP_690654; TP21-L - YP_002333563; GVE3 - YP_009223720; GBSV1 - YP_764473; phiO2 - YP_008240332; GBK2 - YP_009010473

A small ORF just upstream of the putative Mgbh1 TerL shows weak similarity to two terminase small subunits (TerS) on the NCBI database using a BLASTp search against all classified and unclassified Caudovirales sequences from Lactobacillus phages phiJL-1 and phi jlb1. It also has a helix-turn-helix motif, involved in DNA binding, similar to other terminase small subunits [50]. The protein also models well, when using the automated model building feature in SWISSMODEL, with an rmsd value of 0.157 Å for Cα to 2AO9. 2AO9 is a homo 18-mer of a protein from B. cereus phage phBC6A51, which also lies directly upstream of its TerL. Taken together, this suggests that ORF13 can tentatively be assigned the small subunit terminase for Mgbh1. The putative large terminase subunit (ORF98) from Shbh1 is most closely related to those from Bacillus myoviruses Grass, phiNIT1, Bcp1, vB_BceM-Bc431v3 and clusters with phages from the B. cereus group (Fig. 3 and Additional file 3: Table S2). Metavir identified phiAGATE as the closest relative, with PHAST suggesting phage Grass as the closest relative. A small ORF (136aa) is present directly upstream of ORF98 but could not be identified as the terminase small subunit based on BLASTp searches alone, showing how different these proteins are from their characterized homologues. The read coverage of Shbh1 indicates that the genome has long terminal repeats indicated by a region of higher than (3234x) average coverage (1714x) from ±26700 bp-30500 bp, while PAUSE3 analysis indicated two points of significant read build up in this region at bases 29638 bp and 30054 bp.

When compared with the NCBInr database, Shpa’s putative terminase large subunit (Fig. 3 and Affitional file 4: Table S3) is most closely related to a terminase sequence of a prophage on an Oceanibulbus species (77% identity over 99% of the sequence) genome which, like Paracoccus, belongs to the family Rhodobacteraceae. For Shpa, BLASTp searches against the NCBInr database also returned hits to terminase-like sequences in non-Paracoccus bacterial genome sequences, rather than terminase-like sequences in prophages of Paracoccus species. Twenty-six Paracoccus genomes have been sequenced thus far including a Paracoccus halophilus but only one (vB_PmaS_IMEP1) of their phages has been sequenced. This suggests that the phage described here does not infect a wide range of Paracoccus species or has not encountered the hosts sequenced thus far and, to date, appears to be unique to this environment. The closest match when comparing it to just viral sequences is to Tetraselmis viridis (phycodnavirus) infecting virus S20 (Fig. 3) and it also shows little similarity with the terminase from the only other described Paracoccus phage, vB_PmaS_IMEP1. S20 is thought to be a phage of bacteria which co-culture with algae [51].

Based on the analysis presented in Fig. 3 we predict that Shpa could have 3’ overhanging cohesive ends, while Shbh1 terminase groups with myoviruses for which a mechanism has yet to be defined (SPO1, phage GRASS and phiNIT1) and Mgbh1 likely uses a headful mechanism.

Structural proteins

Major capsid and portal proteins could be identified for all three phages, while head to tail joining proteins could be identified in Shpa and Mgbh1. Phage Shbh1 encodes putative tail fiber proteins (ORF126, 135 and 137) which contain repeated protein sequences similar to what has been identified in the long and short tail fiber proteins (gp34 and gp12) of phage T4 [52]. As Shbh1 is not too dissimilar from mesophilic Bacillus infecting phages, it’s structural proteins may give insight into the adaptation of proteins in general or specifically phage structural proteins to high pH, high salt environments. Similarly, ORFs 28, 29 and 30 of Mgbh1 show repeated protein sequences and likewise a 129 bp direct repeat was identified close to the C-terminal of ORF19 in Shpa that is responsible for a repeated amino acid sequence. ORF19 encodes a putative tail fiber protein which ends with the stop codon at 15621 bp. However, homology to a choice-of-anchor A domain protein (gp21 Burkholderia phage phi644-2, YP_001111100.1, 1101 bp) starts immediately downstream (15622 bp) of the stop codon in reading frame 3 and continues until 16330 bp. It may be that read through translation results in the full length protein being produced.

Mobile genetic elements

An intact IS605 element (ORF53) was identified on Mgbh1, but did not have an IS200 element associated with it. A 33 bp direct repeat was identified 90 bp upstream (39260–39293; 39326–39359) of the IS605 element on Mgbh1. IS605 and IS200 elements identified on Shbh1 appear truncated and likely inactive. No repeats of significance could be identified in the immediate vicinity of the insertion sequence elements on Shbh1. The location of the IS elements suggests that these are areas which tolerate disruption to a certain degree (DNA replication and repair) possibly due to these functions being complemented by host factors and similarly suggests that areas related to expression of proteins involved with phage structural components are more sensitive to interruption.

Nucleotide metabolism, replication and gene expression

Ribonucleotide reductases (RNR) were identified in both Mgbh1 and Shbh1. An activator protein could also be identified on Mgbh1 (ORF 62; nrdI), but not on Shbh1. This suggests that the RNR encoded on Mgbh1 belongs to class Ib while the one on Shbh1 belongs to class Ia RNRs. The separation of the two subunits of RNR by a homing endonuclease such as is identified on Shbh1 has been described before, although in this case does not appear to interrupt the reading frame of either subunit [53]. No RNRs were detected on Shpa.

Mgbh1 and Shbh1 both encode thymidylate synthases. It has been demonstrated that TS1 type thymidylate synthases are unique to the Bastille group of Bacillus infecting phages and may be used as a phylogenetic marker [54]. According to the identity cut-offs defined by Asare, the thymidylate synthase of Shbh1 (57% identity to that of Bastille and E-value of 1 × 10-111) demonstrates that it belongs to the Bastille group, whereas Mgbh1 does not. Shbh1 however appears to lack a dihydrofolate reductase homolog, often found between two and six ORFs downstream of the thymidylate synthase, in Bastille phages, which was also identified as another marker gene for this group. It also does not encode a metal dependent beta-lactamase homolog as has been found for the other members of this group, but does encode two putative metal dependent enzymes: ORF13 and 20, encoding a metallophosphoesterase and metalloendopeptidase membrane proteins respectively. The Shbh1 SpoIIIE homolog (ORF 25), another hallmark of this group of phages, is located eight and five ORFs downstream of these metallo-enzymes respectively which is an arrangement also observed in other Bastille phages.

Both Mgbh1 and Shbh1 encode DNA polymerases (ORF 57 and 160), whereas Shpa does not. Both of these enzymes should have 3’-5’ exonuclease activity, however the DNA polymerase identified on Shbh1 also contains an N-terminal uracil DNA glycosylase (UDG) domain similar to that found on the Bacillus phage SPO1 DNA polymerase. Although characterized as a part of DNA excision repair processes, the presence of this domain in DNA polymerases has been suggested to aid in polymerase processivity [55]. ORFs likely involved with DNA replication of Shpa are ORFs 33, 34, 38, 45 and 46, which include a helicase, primase, single stranded DNA binding protein and a protein containing a ParBc endonuclease-like domain [56].

GC skew analysis of Shbh1 shows a possible replication origin (global minimum in GC skew) and terminus (global maximum in GC skew) at ±60kbp and 0/138 kbp respectively (Additional file 5: Figure S2). An intricate inverted and direct repeat structure at the ±60kbp site also suggests a replication or transcription regulation site at this position. The genome of Shbh1 is terminally redundant with 336 bp direct terminal repeats found at the ends of the sequence. A second local maximum (±30kbp) corresponds to an area where the direction of transcription changes. A putative replication origin and terminus was also identified for Shpa at the 0/38kbp and at ±21kbp respectively (Additional file 6: Figure S4). The GC skew plot for Mgbh1 is similar to those of genetic elements which replicate solely through a rolling circle mechanism, while those that go through both theta and RC stages show defined minima [57] (Additional file 7: Figure S3). No repeats of significance could be identified for Mgbh1.

ORF17 on Mgbh1 does not have an identifiable start codon, however the remainder of the protein appears to be related to phage proteins on the NCBI database, which are also described as partial proteins. It may be that ORF16 and ORF17 are co-translated. ORF27 and 45 on Mgbh1 may have earlier start sites (16911 bp, 33220 bp) and be produced through stutter or read through translation. The Imm_39 domain containing protein on Shbh1 has a stop codon in the reading frame and the full length protein may be produced as a result of read through translation. Three 27 bp direct repeats were identified on Shpa from 17204 bp to 17284 bp which may serve as a transcription regulation site.

No tRNAs could be identified for Shbh1 or Mgbh1. It has been suggested that a reason for the presence of, especially large numbers of tRNAs, on broad host range phage genomes is to compensate for different codon usage patterns in host bacteria. Shbh1 infects at least two different Bacillus species, yet harbours no tRNAs, suggesting very similar codon usage profiles in these hosts (9.8% mean difference in codon usage). Shpa encodes one tRNA (Trp; 37819–37889 bp). An analysis of the proteins encoded by Shpa shows that the tryptophan content is 1.3 times as high as for proteins in P. denitrificans, giving a possible reason as to why this tRNA is retained on the phage [58].

Lysis and Lysogeny

ORF107 on Shbh1 appears to be a cro–like regulator and identifies the area upstream of it, which includes inverted and direct repeats, as a region likely involved in control of the lysis/lysogeny balance. The “bulls eye” plaque morphology for Shbh1 on ERV9 is suggestive of the phage being lysogenic in this host, however there was no easily identifiable integrase on Shbh1. No integrase related proteins could be identified on Shpa either. There is however a resolvase (ORF152) and a recombinase (ORF164), on Shbh1, which may serve as integrase for the phage. A holin-like protein (ORF167) was identified on Shbh1, but separated from the endolysin-like protein (ORF94) by 77 kbp and appears to lack the dual start motif described for other holins [59]. This holin-like protein has two predicted transmembrane regions (24–46aa; 56–75aa), classifying this as a ClassII holin [60].

Two holin-like proteins (ORF33 and 34) identified on Mgbh1 lie directly upstream of a putative endolysin (ORF35). ORF34 has a potential dual start motif (MESEIIRM), however the methionine residues are separated by more residues than usual. Both of the Mgbh1 proteins only have one predicted transmembrane region (ORF33—5-24aa; ORF34—12-34aa) each, grouping them with ClassIII holins.

It is of interest that the terminase large subunit of Mgbh1 is most similar to sequences which are likely from lysogenic phages in the genome sequences of Bacillus species, but not to terminases of Bacillus infecting phage genome sequences deposited on the NCBI database. Together with the observation that clear plaques are formed on the MGK1 host, this could suggest that the phage is a lytic version of a phage(s) that, more often than not, display a lysogenic lifestyle.

A 65 bp nucleotide sequence (29421–29486 bp) with 100% DNA identity to a sequence adjacent to the B. halodurans 5S rDNA was identified on Mgbh1 located inside ORF37 just upstream of the putative recombinase/integrase (ORF38). This may suggest that the phage inserts itself at this position on the B. halodurans chromosome when lysogenizing the host.

A holin could not be identified on Shpa, however a peptidoglycan recognition protein (PGRP) domain protein (ORF27) was identified, and it is known that endolysin-like proteins have such domains [61, 62]. It also displays homology to lysozyme-like proteins likely involved in cell wall degradation, either during infection or cell lysis for release of progeny. Shpa seems to lack the genes associated with lysogeny (integrase, recombinases), and together with the observation of clear plaques on HS3 suggests that it too is lytic.

Phage signatures on currently available genomes and metagenomes

A BLASTn search of Mgbh1 against the CRISPR database identified three perfectly conserved spacer regions on the genome sequence of B. halodurans C-125, and are all part of the same CRISPR array (Table 3). This suggests that Mgbh1 or a very closely related phage could have infected B. halodurans strains isolated from various regions around the world (C-125 from soil in Japan) [63]. Six other imperfect match spacers were also identified in the C-125 genome. The nucleotide sequence differences between these spacers and phage genome sequence could represent adaptation of the phage to host resistance. It has been shown that even single nucleotide changes in proto-spacer regions incorporated by bacteria as CRISPR spacers can result in phage becoming virulent again [64]. For Shbh1 two potential CRISPR spacers could be identified on the B. halodurans C-125 genome (Table 3). No CRISPR spacers could be identified for Shpa, when searching current databases, and this is likely due to there being few Paracoccus genomes on these databases (including the host species identified here) or could indicate that the phage is not widespread.
Table 3

CRISPR spacer regions corresponding to the genome sequence of Shbh1 and Mgbh1 in currently available bacterial genomes

Phage

Bacterial strain

CRISPR spacer sequence

CRISPR repeat unit sequence

Location on phage

Mgbh1

B. halodurans C-125

CAAAGTGATCGGATCATTCGTTTAATCCCTCCCCTT

GTCGCACTCTTCATGGGTGCGTGGATTGAAAT

47980–48015

TCGAAAGTTTCGAGGAGTCTAACGGAGCGGAAGA

GTCGCACTCTTCATGGGTGCGTGGATTGAAAT

16247–16280

CTAACTGCAACGTTATATACGCGGGCTGTCTTGA

GTCGCACTCTTCATGGGTGCGTGGATTGAAAT

21267–21296

GTTGCG T ACCGCTCCTTGCGGCGACGTGTCGGGC

GTCGCACTCTTCATGGGTGCGTGGATTGAAAT

5105–5138

ATTATCGTTAGGGTAGGGGTTACTAT C G T AGATGAC

GTCGCACTCTTCATGGGTGCGTGGATTGAAAT

24974–25007

GTGCGGTAGATGATCCA G GACTTT C GATCGCCGTAATT

GTCGCACTCTTCATGGGTGCGTGGATTGAAAT

35921–35956

CGCCCAC T TTACGAATAACAGCAAGA G ACGTGCATAA

GTCGCACTCTTCATGGGTGCGTGGATTGAAAT

48859–48893

CCTACCGCG C CGCCAC T GTCGTTAAA G TCCTCTAGCGTC

GTCGCACTCTTCATGGGTGCGTGGATTGAAAT

27504–27539

GGATTTTACGAG A ACA G TGGAGCGATATATAAA C CGCG

GTCGCACTCTACATGAGTGCGTGGATTGAAAT

3543–3577

Shbh1

B. halodurans C-125

TCTTAAA G TCTTTTATC T AATTGCTCTCTTGTAACA G

GTCGCACTCTACACGAGTGCGTGGATTGAAAT

34484–34516

G A AAGTATGAC T AAGTTTGTAGGG T C A TTGAAAATTCATG

GTCGCACTCTTCATGGGTGCGTGGATTGAAAT

25969–26003

Subscript sequence corresponds to phage DNA sequence while superscript corresponds to the sequence of the bacterium

Two soda lake metagenome datasets (Kulunda Steppe Russia and Soda Lake California) are currently available and these were investigated for the presence of the phages described here [65] (SRR3306837). From the Soda lake metagenomic dataset 111 reads mapped to the Shpa genome at 80% similarity and 60% length fraction or reads, covering 2771 bp of the genome, and 34 reads mapped to Shbh1. This could indicate the presence of these phages or related phages in this environment. There were no sequences similar to either Mgbh1 or Shbh1 identified in the Kulunda Steppe metagenome, however two contigs showed regions with nucleotide similarity to the terminase large subunit from Shpa (1613 bp; 68% identity with 97% query coverage). When a BLASTx was performed of these sequences against the NCBInr database, the best hit was within a Rhodobacter sphaeroides genome. To further investigate whether or not the contigs represented phages or prophages, these were analysed by PHAST. Neither contig appears to contain more than just the one ORF with similarity to the large terminase subunit and neither appears to be a phage or prophage, making it unlikely that these represent related phages. Thus, this suggests that Shpa may not be present in that environment.

Conclusion

Here we’ve described three novel phages isolated from halo-alkaline environments, and as very few phages that infect alkaliphic and more specifically haloalkaliphilic microorganisms have been described, these three phages are rather unique [46, 66, 67]. It is unknown exactly what the role of the host organisms identified here is in their respective environments, however the presence of possibly lytic phages such as Shpa and Shbh1, could have a significant impact on their hosts and therefore the environment in which they find themselves. The impact that phages can have in natural settings is well understood, but their impact in anthropogenic settings is less clear, where they could either be the cause of a problem or be a solution for it. Paracoccus species have been isolated from a wide range of environments, including biofilters used in the treatment of waste gases from animal rendering plants, groundwater contaminated with dichloromethane, a sulfide-oxidizing, denitrifying fluidized-bed reactor, wastewater from semiconductor manufacturing processes and in and around child care facilities [68, 69]. One aspect to the study of phages and their interactions with their hosts is the potential for phage derived products and novel genetic systems. These can be in the form of phage host pairs (phage display, genetic systems, phage therapy; food preservation), endolysin/lysozyme (phage therapy; biofouling), DNA/RNA polymerases, DNA/RNA ligases for research and includes the chance of discovering new interactions such as CRISPR systems which have been developed into excellent genome editing tools [70]. The endolysin proteins of all three phages could be useful in treating fouling of filters by these or closely related organisms and may perform best in high pH/high salt environments. Although soda lakes make up a small percentage of aquatic environments, the microorganisms which are found in these environments can help us further delineate the limits at which life occurs and the addition of these three phages to the databases will hopefully aide in this process.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

This work was funded by the National Research Foundation (NRF) of South Africa

Availability of data and material

All bacterial strains and viruses are available from IMBM on request.

Authors’ contributions

MT and DAC conceived the study and collected the sample material. SN and JC performed all experiments. LVZ analysed experimental results and wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interest.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Institute for Microbial Biotechnology and Metagenomics (IMBM), Department of Biotechnology, University of the Western Cape
(2)
Department of Genetics, University of Pretoria

References

  1. Oremland RS, Marsh L, Desmarais DJ. Methanogenesis in big soda lake, Nevada: an alkaline, moderately hypersaline desert lake. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1982;43:462–8.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Sorokin DY, Kuenen JG. Haloalkaliphilic sulfur-oxidizing bacteria in soda lakes. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2005a;29:685–702.Google Scholar
  3. Grant WD. Cultivation of aerobic alkaliphiles. In: Rainey FA, Oren A, editors. Methods in microbiology: Extremophiles, vol. 35. Sandiego: Elsevier; 2006. p. 439–49.Google Scholar
  4. Ulukanli Z, Diúrak M. Alkaliphilic micro-organisms and habitats. Turk J Biol. 2002;26:181–91.Google Scholar
  5. Sorokin DY, Kuenen JG. Chemolithotrophic haloalkaliphiles from soda lakes. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2005b;52:287–295.Google Scholar
  6. Foti M, Ma S, Sorokin DY, Rademaker JLW, Kuenen G, Muyzer G. Genetic diversity and biogeography of haloalkaliphilic sulphur oxidizing bacteria belonging to the genus Thioalkalivibrio. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2006;56:95–101.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Beadle LC. Scientific results of the Cambridge expedition to the East African lakes 1930. IV. The water of some East African lakes in relation to their flora and fauna. Zool J Linn Soc. 1932;38:157–211.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Jenkin PM. Reports of the Percy Sladen expedition to some Rift Valley lakes in Kenya in 1929, Summary of the ecological results with special reference to the alkaline lakes. Annal Mag Nat Hist. 1932;8:133–81.Google Scholar
  9. Rich F. Scientific results of the Cambridge expedition to the East African lakes 1930-1-7. The algae. Zool J Linn Soc. 1933;38:249–75.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Grant WD, Jones BE, Mwatha WE. Alkaliphiles: ecology, diversity and applications. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 1990;75:255–70.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Jones BE, Grant WD. Microbial diversity and ecology of the Soda Lakes of East Africa. In: Bell CR, Brylinsky M, Johnson-Green P, editors. Ecology and diversity of extremophiles. Canada: Atlantic Canada Society for Microbial Ecology; 2000.Google Scholar
  12. Melack JM, Kilham P. Photosynthetic rates of phytoplankton in East African alkaline, saline lakes. Limnol Oceanogr. 1974;19:743–55.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Tudorancea C, Zullini A. Associations and distribution of benthic nematodes in the Ethiopian Rift Valley lakes. Hydrobiologia. 1989;179:81–96.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Legesse D, Vallet-Coulomb C, Gasse F. Analysis of the hydrological response of a tropical terminal lake, Lake Abiyata (Main Ethiopian Rift Valley) to changes in climate and human activities. Hydrol Process. 2004;18:487–504.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Denson JD, Ivey MD, Leuko S, Rothschild LJ, Hand KL (2010) A Survey of the Microbial Diversity of an Alkaline Biofilm Associated with a Unique Geological Feature within a Hot Spring of the Hypersaline Basin of Lake Magadi, Kenya. Astrobiology Science Conference, Evolution and Life: Surviving Catastrophes and Extremes on Earth and Beyond, 1538, 5510. April 26-20, League City, Lunar and Planetary InstituteGoogle Scholar
  16. Lanzén A, Simachew A, Gessesse A, Chmolowska D, Jonassen I, Øvreås L. Surprising prokaryotic and eukaryotic diversity, community structure and biogeography of Ethiopian soda lakes. PLoS One. 2013;8:e72577. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0072577.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Jiang S, Steward G, Jellison R, Chu W, Choi S. Abundance, distribution, and diversity of viruses in alkaline, hypersaline Mono Lake, California. Micriob Ecol. 2004;47:9–17.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Sabet S, Chu W, Jiang SC. Isolation and genetic analysis of haloalkaliphic bacteriophages in a North American soda lake. Microb Ecol. 2006;51:543–54.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Brum JR, Steward GF, Jiang SC, Jellison R. Spatial and temporal variability of prokaryotes, viruses, and viral infections of prokaryotes in an alkaline, hypersaline lake. Aquat Microb Ecol. 2005;41:247–60.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Hatfull GF. Bacteriophage genomics. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2008;11:447–53.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Deschavanne P, DuBow MS, Regeard C. The use of genomic signature distance between bacteriophages and their hosts displays evolutionary relationships and phage growth cycle determination. Virology J. 2010;7:163. doi:10.1186/1743-422X-7-163.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Suttle CA. Viruses in the sea. Nature. 2005;437:356–61.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Peduzzi P, Gruber M, Gruber M, Schager M. The virus’s tooth: cyanophages affect an African flamingo population in a bottom-up cascade. ISME J. 2014;8:1346–51.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  24. Varga M, Kuntova L, Pantucek R, Maslanova I, Ruzickova V, Doskar J. Efficient transfer of antibiotic resistance plasmids by transduction within methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus USA300 clone. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2012;332:146–52.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Modi SR, Lee HH, Spina CS, Collins JJ. Antibiotic treatment expands the resistance reservoir and ecological network of the phage metagenome. Nature. 2013;499:219–22.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  26. Witte A, Baranyi U, Klein R, Sulzner M, Luo C, Wanner G, Krȕger DH, Lubitz W. Characterization of Natronobacterium magadii phage ΦCh1, a unique archaeal phage containing DNA and RNA. Mol Microbiol. 1997;23:603–16.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Sorokin DY, Berben T, Melton ED, Overmars L, Vavourakis CD, Muyzer G. Microbial diversity and biogeochemical cycling in soda lakes. Extremophiles. 2014;18:791–809.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  28. Paul D, Kumbhare SV, Mhatre SS, Chowdhury SP, Shetty SA, Marathe NP, Bhute S, Shouche YS. Exploration of microbial diversity and community structure of lonar lake: the only hypersaline meteorite crater lake within basalt rock. Front Microbiol. 2015;6:1553.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Antony CP, Kumaresan D, Hunger S, Drake HL, Murrell JC, Shouche YS. Microbiology of Lonar Lake and other soda lakes. ISME J. 2013;7:468–76.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Sorokin ID, Kravchenko IK, Tourova TP, Kolganova TV, Boulygina ES, Sorokin DY. Bacillus alkalidiazotrophicus sp. nov., a diazotrophic, low salt-tolerant alkaliphile from Mongolian soda soil. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2008;58:2459–64.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Dziewit L, Czarnecki J, Wibberg D, Radlinska M, Mrozek P, Szymczak M, Schlüter A, Pühler A, Bartosik D. Architecture and functions of a multipartite genome of the methylotrophicbacterium Paracoccus aminophilus JCM 7686, containing primary and secondary chromids. BMC Genomics. 2014;15:124. doi:10.1186/1471-2164-15-124.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  32. Sato M, Beppu T, Arima K. Studies on antibiotics produced at high alkaline ph. Agric Biol Chem. 1983;47:2019–27.Google Scholar
  33. Adams MH. Bacteriophages. New York: Interscience; 1959.Google Scholar
  34. Middelboe M, Chan AM, Bertelsen SK. Isolation and life cycle characterization of lytic viruses infecting heterotrophic bacteria and cyanobacteria. Man Aquat Viral Ecol. 2010;13:118–33.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Fortier LC, Moineau S. Morphological and genetic diversity of temperate phages in Clostridium difficile. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2007;73:7358–66.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  36. Hansen MC, Tolker-Nelson T, Givskov M, Molin S. Biased 16S rDNA PCR amplification caused by interference from DNA flanking template region. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 1998;15:25–36.Google Scholar
  37. Baker GC, Smith JJ, Cowan DA. Review and re-analysis of domain-specific 16S primers. J Microbiol Meth. 2003;55:541–55.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Teeling H, Waldmann J, Lombardot T, Bauer M, Glöckner FO. TETRA: a web-service and a stand-alone program for the analysis and comparison of tetranucleotide usage patterns in DNA sequences. BMC Bioinformatics. 2004;5:163. doi:10.1186/1471-2105-5-163.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  39. Pride DT, Wassenaar TM, Ghose C, Blaser MJ. Evidence of host-virus co-evolution in tetranucleotide usage patterns of bacteriophages and eukaryotic viruses. BMC Genomics. 2006;7:8. doi:10.1186/1471-2164-7-8.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  40. Tamura K, Stecher G, Peterson D, Filipski A, Kumar S. MEGA6: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 6.0. Mol Biol Evol. 2013;30:2725–9.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  41. Schito GC. Development of coliphage N4: ultrastructural studies. J Virol. 1974;13:186–96.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  42. Balan A, Padilla G. New thermal inducible Streptomyces phages isolated from tropical soils. Braz J Genet. 1997. doi:10.1590/S0100-84551997000400002.Google Scholar
  43. Torrents E. Ribonucleotide reductases: essential enzymes for bacterial life. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2014. doi:10.3389/fcimb.2014.00052.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  44. Miller SY, Colquhoun JM, Perl AL, Chamakura KR, Everett GFK. Complete genome of bacillus subtilis myophage grass. Genome Announc. 2013;1:e00857–13. doi:10.1128/genomeA.00857-13.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  45. Barylski J, Nowicki G, Goździcka-Józefiak A. The discovery of phiAGATE, a novel phage infecting bacillus pumilus, leads to New insights into the phylogeny of the subfamily spounavirinae. PLoS One. 2014;9:e86632. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0086632.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  46. Kropinski AM, Hayward M, Agnew MD, Jarrell KF. The genome of BCJA1c: a bacteriophage active against the alkaliphilic bacterium, Bacillus clarkia. Extremophiles. 2005;9:99–109.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Rocha EPC, Danchin A. Base composition bias might result from competition for metabolic resources. Trends Genet. 2002;18:291–4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Dupuis M-E, Moineau S. Genome organization and characterization of the virulent lactococcal phage 1358 and its similarities to Listeria phage. Appl Environ Microbial. 2010;76:1623–32.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  49. Pope WH, Jacobs-Sera D, Russell DA, Rubin DHF, Kajee A, Msibi ZNP, Larsen MH, Jacobs Jr WR, Lawrence JG, Hendrix RW, Hatfull GF. Genomics and proteomics of mycobacteriophage patience, an accidental tourist in the mycobacterium neighborhood. MBio. 2014;5:e02145–14. doi:10.1128/mBio.02145-14.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  50. Lin H, Simon MN, Black LW. Purification and characterization of the small subunit of phage T4Terminase, gp16, required for DNA packaging. J Biol Chem. 1997;6:3495–501.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  51. Kazlauskas D, Krupovic M, Venclovas Č. The logic of DNA replication in double-stranded DNA viruses: insights from global analysis of viral genomes. Nucl Acids Res. 2015. doi:10.1093/nar/gkw322.Google Scholar
  52. Leiman PG, Arisaka F, van Raaij MJ, Kostyuchenko VA, Aksyuk AA, Kanamaru S, Rossmann MG. Morphogenesis of the T4 tail and tail fibers. Virology J. 2010;7:355.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  53. Friedrich NC, Torrents E, Gibb EA, Sahlin M, Sjöberg BM, Edgell DR. Insertion of a homing endonuclease creates a genes-in-pieces ribonucleotide reductase that retains function. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2007;104:6176–81.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  54. Asare PT, Jeong T-Y, Ryu S, Klumpp J, Loessner MJ, Merrill BD, Kim K-P. Putative type 1 thymidylate synthase and dihydrofolate reductase as signature genes of a novel bastille-like group of phages in the subfamily Spounavirinae. BMC Genomics. 2015;16:582. doi:10.1186/s12864-015-1757-0.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  55. Kazlauskas D, Venclovas Č. Computational analysis of DNA replicases in double-stranded DNA viruses: relationship with the genome size. Nucl Acids Res. 2011;39:8291–305.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  56. Kropinski AM, Van den Bossche A, Lavigne R, Noben J-P, Babinger P, Schmitt R. Genome and proteome analysis of 7-7-1, a flagellotropic phage infecting Agrobacterium sp H13-3. Virology J. 2012;9:102. doi:10.1186/1743-422X-9-102.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  57. Arakawa K, Suzuki H, Tomita M. Quantitative analysis of replication-related mutation and selection pressures in bacterial chromosomes and plasmids using generalised GC skew index. BMC Genomics. 2009:10: doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-10-640.Google Scholar
  58. Bailly-Bechet M, Vergassola M, Rocha E. Causes for the intriguing presence of tRNAs in phages. Genome Res doi. 2007. doi:10.1101/gr.6649807.Google Scholar
  59. Wang IN, Smith DL, Young R. Holins: the protein clocks of bacteriophage infections. Annu Rev Microbiol. 2000;54:799–825.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Shi Y, Yan Y, Ji W, Du B, Meng X, Wang H, Sun J. Characterization and determination of holin protein of Streptococcus suis bacteriophage SMP in heterologous host. Virology J. 2012;9:70. doi:10.1186/1743-422X-9-70.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  61. Dziarski R, Gupta D. The peptidoglycan recognition proteins (PGRPs). Gen Biol. 2006;7:232. doi:10.1186/gb-2006-7-8-232.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  62. Park J, Yun J, Lim JA, Kang DH, Ryu S. Characterization of an endolysin, LysBPS13, from a Bacillus cereus bacteriophage. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2012;332:76–83.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Takami H, Horikoshi K. Reidentification of facultatively alkaliphilic Bacillus sp. C-125 to Bacillus halodurans. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 1999;63:943–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Deveau H, Barrangou R, Garneau JE, Labonté J, Fremaux C, Boyaval P, Romero DA, Horvath P, Moineau S. Phage response to CRISPR-encoded resistance in streptococcus thermophiles. J Bacteriol. 2008;190:1390–400.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Vavourakis CD, Ghai R, Rodriguez-Valera F, Sorokin DY, Tringe SG, Hugenholtz P, Muyzer G. Metagenomic insights into the uncultured diversity and physiology of microbes in four hypersaline soda lake brines. Front Microbiol. 2016. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2016.00211.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  66. Horikoshi K, Yonezawa Y. A bacteriophage active on an alkalophilic Bacillus sp. J Gen Virol. 1978;39:183–5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  67. Wernick DG, Pontrelli SP, Pollock AW, Liao JC. Sustainable biorefining in wastewater by engineered extreme alkaliphile Bacillus marmarensis. Sci Rep. 2016;6:20224. doi:10.1038/srep20224.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  68. Bartosik D, Szymanik M, Baj J. Identification and distribution of insertion sequences of paracoccus solventivorans. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2003;69:7002–8.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  69. Shin S-K, Kim J, Ha S-m, Oh H-S, Chun J, Sohn J, Yi H. Metagenomic insights into the bioaerosols in the indoor and outdoor environments of childcare facilities. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0126960. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0126960.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  70. Fagerlund RD, Staals RHJ, Fineran PC. The Cpf1 CRISPR-Cas protein expands genome-editing tools. Genome Biol. 2015;16:251. doi:10.1186/s13059-015-0824-9.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  71. Saitou N, Nei M. The neighbor-joining method: A new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol. 1987;4:406–25.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2016

Advertisement