- Open Access
Characterization of the HIV-1 integrase chromatin- and LEDGF/p75-binding abilities by mutagenic analysis within the catalytic core domain of integrase
© Zheng et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010
- Received: 27 November 2009
- Accepted: 23 March 2010
- Published: 23 March 2010
During the early stage of HIV-1 replication, integrase (IN) plays important roles at several steps, including reverse transcription, viral DNA nuclear import, targeting viral DNA to host chromatin and integration. Previous studies have demonstrated that HIV-1 IN interacts with a cellular Lens epithelium-derived growth factor (LEDGF/p75) and that this viral/cellular interaction plays an important role for tethering HIV-1 preintegration complexes (PICs) to transcriptionally active units of host chromatin. Meanwhile, other studies have revealed that the efficient knockdown and/or knockout of LEDGF/p75 could not abolish HIV infection, suggesting a LEDGF/p75-independent action of IN for viral DNA chromatin targeting and integration, even though the underlying mechanism(s) is not fully understood.
In this study, we performed site-directed mutagenic analysis at the C-terminal region of the IN catalytic core domain responsible for IN/chromatin binding and IN/LEDGF/p75 interaction. The results showed that the IN mutations H171A, L172A and EH170,1AA, located in the loop region 170EHLK173 between the α4 and α5 helices of IN, severely impaired the interaction with LEDGF/p75 but were still able to bind chromatin. In addition, our combined knockdown approach for LEDGF/p75 also failed to dissociate IN from chromatin. This suggests that IN has a LEDGF/p75-independent determinant for host chromatin binding. Furthermore, a single-round HIV-1 replication assay showed that the viruses harboring IN mutants capable of LEDGF/p75-independent chromatin binding still sustained a low level of infection, while the chromatin-binding defective mutant was non-infectious.
All of these data indicate that, even though the presence of LEDGF/p75 is important for a productive HIV-1 replication, IN has the ability to bind chromatin in a LEDGF/p75-independent manner and sustains a low level of HIV-1 infection. Hence, it is interesting to define the mechanism(s) underlying IN-mediated LEDGF/p75-independent chromatin targeting, and further studies in this regard will help for a better understanding of the molecular mechanism of chromatin targeting by IN during HIV-1 infection.
- 293T Cell
- Chromatin Binding
- Catalytic Core Domain
- Chromatin Target
- Host Chromatin
The human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) protein integrase (IN) catalyzes the insertion of proviral DNA into host chromosomes, a unique and obligatory step for all retroviral infection. The integration of proviral DNA is a two-step process involving 3' processing and 5' strand transfer, which has been well characterized by in vitro studies [1, 2]. Integration occurs between a large nucleoprotein complex, referred to as the preintegration complex (PIC), and host chromatin. Nevertheless, how the PIC and chromatin interact within the nucleus remains largely unknown. Shortly after viral entry, the PIC formed in the host cellular cytoplasm is a functional nucleoprotein complex in which newly reverse transcribed viral DNAs are complexed with both viral proteins, including IN, matrix (MA), nucleocapsid, reverse transcriptase (RT), viral protein R (Vpr) and various cellular proteins (reviewed by Al-Mawsawi LQ et al.) . These cellular proteins include Lens epithelium-derived growth factor (LEDGF), Integrase interactor 1 (INi1), high-mobility group protein 1 (HMGA1), barrier to auto-integration factor (BAF), Heat shock protein 60 (HSP60), Polycomb group embryonic ectoderm development (EED) protein, etc. (for a review see ). After nuclear import, PICs are targeted to the chromatin until successful integration into one of the host chromosomes.
As a functional component of PICs [5, 6], the roles of LEDGF or p75 during lentiviral DNA integration have attracted increasing interest in recent years. LEDGF/p75, discovered as a general transcriptional co-activator , was isolated from a human lens epithelial cell (LEC) cDNA library and named LEDGF by Singh DP et al. . LEDGF/p75 interacts with IN by its Integrase Binding Domain (IBD) (residues 341-429) [9, 10]. The binding sites for LEDGF/p75 in IN are mainly located within the catalytic core domain (CCD) and around amino acids W131, W132 and I161-E170 [9, 11–13]. The LEDGF/p75 plays multiple roles during HIV-1 infection through interaction with IN, such as protecting IN from proteasomal degradation , potentially affecting the nuclear transport of IN [5, 14], stabilizing IN as a tetramer , enhancing IN enzymatic activities [16, 17] and, most strikingly, serving as the IN-to-chromatin tethering factor driving PICs to transcriptionally active regions of host chromosomes [5, 14].
A number of previous studies have employed in vitro biochemical approaches to study the interaction between IN and DNA substrates by using oligonucleotides that mimic the HIV LTR, and they have identified several residues in the IN that are responsible for its affinity for DNA [18–20]. All three domains of IN, including the N-terminal domain (NTD), CCD and C-terminal domain (CTD), have been shown to interact with DNA by in vitro studies [21–23]. However, how IN interacts with host chromatin under physiological conditions is considerably less well understood. Recently, by using a cell-based chromatin binding assay and co-immunoprecipitation (co-IP), we have identified three IN mutations (V165A, A179P, KR186,7AA) that impaired binding to host chromatin and LEDGF/p75 . According to recent reports by Berthoux  and McKee et al. , the reduced affinity of IN KR186,7AA for LEDGF/p75 is due to disabled oligomerization of IN. As described previously, V165 is involved in the IN/LEDGF/p75 interaction interface [11, 12, 26], and A179 was identified as a new LEDGF/p75-binding site. The structure of the IN CCD and LEDGF IBD complex has been solved by a co-crystallization study . Moreover, a recent study revealed that the interaction requires two asymmetric IN dimers and two LEDGF/p75 molecules, which was determined by mass spectrometry and cryo-electron microscopy . However, both the architecture of the functional IN/LEDGF/DNA complex as well as the way in which these two proteins interact and work on both the viral DNA and host chromatin in the process of integration remain elusive. Further mutagenic analysis for IN/chromatin and IN/LEDGF interactions may not only help to elucidate the molecular mechanism of the IN/chromatin tethering and binding but also facilitate the identification of novel cellular factor(s) involved in this important viral replication step.
In the present study, we investigated the interactions of various IN mutants with host cell chromatin and LEDGF/p75 by cell-based chromatin binding and co-IP assays. In addition to previously described LEDGF/p75-binding defective IN mutants V165A, A179P, KR186,7AA [11, 24, 26], this study also identified several new IN mutants, including K159P, V176A and I203P, which reside in α4 to α6 helices of IN that lost the ability to bind to both chromatin and LEDGF/p75. Interestingly, we also found that several IN mutations, H171A, L172A and EH170,1AA, within the loop region 170EHLK173 of IN, impaired the interaction with LEDGF/p75, but retained chromatin binding ability. This suggests that the IN is able to bind chromatin independently of LEDGF/p75. Consistently, our combined knockdown approach for LEDGF/p75 also failed to dissociate IN from chromatin. Moreover, we have also tested the effect of these IN mutants on HIV-1 infection, and our results revealed that the viruses harboring the IN mutants incapable of binding chromatin completely lost infectivity. However, viruses bearing IN mutants with chromatin-binding ability still sustained low levels of viral infection. All of these results clearly indicated that while the LEDGF/p75-binding ability of IN is important for productive HIV-1 replication, the IN has the ability to bind chromatin in a LEDGF/p75-independent manner and is sufficient to sustain a low level of HIV-1 infection.
Cell lines and transfection
Human embryonic kidney 293T and the African green monkey kidney COS-7 cell lines were cultured in Dulbecco's Modified Eagles Medium (DMEM) supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum (FCS) and 1% penicillin-streptomycin. Human CD4+ C8166 T-lymphoid cells were maintained in RPMI-1640 medium supplemented with 10% FCS and 1% penicillin-streptomycin. For transfection of 293T cells and COS-7 cells, the standard calcium phosphate precipitation technique, was used as described previously .
Plasmids and reagents
For chromatin binding, co-IP and immunofluorescence assay, various CMV-YFP-IN mutants including EH170,1AA, EK170,3AA, HL171,2AA and HK171,3AA were constructed by PCR-based site-directed mutagenesis. The nucleotide sequences of the sense mutagenic oligonucleotides are as follows: EH170,1AA, sense, 5'-AGATCAGGCTGCTGCTCTTAAGAC-3'; EK170,3AA, sense, 5'-GATCAGGCTGCACATCTTGCGACAGCAGT-3'; HL171,2AA, sense, 5'-AGGCTGAAGCTGCTAAGACAGC-3'; HK171,3AA, sense, 5'-AGGCTGAAGCTCTTGCGACAGCAGTAC-3'. The amplified HIV-1 IN fragment was cloned in-frame at the 3' end of the EYFP cDNA in a pEYFP-C1 vector (Clontech) at BglII and BamH1 sites. To construct pAcGFP-INwt/mut, each of the INwt/mut coding sequences was subcloned into pAcGFP1-C vector (Clontech) in-frame with the AcGFP coding sequence at BglII and BamH1 restriction sites. LEDGF/p75 was cloned into the pProLabel vector in-frame downstream of the ProLabel tag named pProLabel-LEDGF. SVCMVin-T7-LEDGF and the RT/IN/Env gene-deleted provirus (NL4.3Luc/ΔBg/ΔRI) were previously described [24, 28]. To test the effect of different IN mutants on viral infection, cDNAs encoding for IN mutants, including EH170,1AA, EK170,3AA and HL171,2AA, were introduced into the SVCMV-Vpr-RT-IN expression plasmid by PCR-based method as described before .
Antibodies used for the immunofluorescence assay, immunoprecipitation or WB are as followed: the mouse monoclonal anti-β-Actin antibody (Abcam Inc.), rabbit anti-LEDGF/p75 (Bethyl Laboratories, Inc.) and anti-T7 monoclonal antibodies (Novagen), and a highly purified anti-GFP IgG fraction (through ion-exchange chromatography) purchased from Invitrogen Inc. (Cat. No. A6455) were used as primary antibodies. FITC-conjugated anti-rabbit antibody (Kirkegaard & Perry Laboratories (KPL)), anti-mouse (GE healthcare) and anti-rabbit HRP-conjugated antibodies (Amersham Biosciences) were used as the secondary antibodies.
Chromatin binding assay
After transfection of YFP-INwt/mut into 293T cells for 48 h, the association of HIV-1 IN with cellular chromatin in mammalian cells was analyzed by a chromatin-binding assay [5, 24]. To simplify the assay, only S1 (non-chromatin-bound) and S2 (chromatin-bound) fractions were analyzed by immunoprecipitation using an anti-GFP antibody and detected by WB with the same antibody. Protein bands in each fraction were further quantified with the software Quantity One (Bio-Rad), and the values are expressed as a percentage of chromatin-bound YFP-IN to total input, which consists of YFP-IN present in both S1 and S2.
COS-7 cells or 293T cells were grown on glass cover slips (12 mm2) in 24-well plates for 24 h and then transfected with different IN expression plasmids CMV-YFP-INwt/mut. After 48 h of transfection, cells on the cover slip were fixed and permeabilized for 30 min in methanol/acetone (1:1 ratio) at room temperature. Then, glass cover slips were incubated with primary rabbit anti-GFP antibody followed by secondary FITC-conjugated anti-rabbit antibody, and nuclei were stained with DAPI. Cells were visualized by a Carl Zeiss microscope (Axiovert 200) with a 63× oil immersion objective. To obtain the clearly defined intracellular localization of each YFP-INwt/mut, we adjusted the parameters of the imaging system for the best image of YFP-IN in glass slides.
Co-immunoprecipitation assay and chemiluminescent co-immunoprecipitation (co-IP) assay
To detect the interaction between YFP-IN wt/mut and T7-LEDGF, the co-immunoprecipitation assay was carried out essentially as reported , except for modifications to the detection of the total input of YFP-IN and T7-LEDGF expression. Briefly, YFP, wild type YFP-IN or each YFP-IN mutant was co-transfected with T7-LEDGF into 293T cells for 48 h. The transfected cells were collected, and 90% of the cells were lysed in 0.25% NP-40 in 199 buffer supplemented with a cocktail of protease inhibitors and clarified by centrifugation at 13,000 rpm for 30 min at 4°C. The supernatant was subsequently subjected to IP with a rabbit anti-GFP antibody. The bound proteins were detected by WB using anti-T7 antibody. Meanwhile, 10% of transfected cells were lysed in 0.5% NP-40, and the lysates were used to detect the expression of YFP-INwt/mut and T7-LEDGF/p75 by WB using anti-GFP and anti-LEDGF antibodies, respectively.
The chemiluminescent co-IP assay was performed according to manufacturer's instructions. After AcGFP1-INwt/mut or AcGFP1-C and ProLabel-LEDGF fusion protein expression plasmids were co-transfected in 293T cells for 48 h, the cells were collected and lysed in 0.25% NP-40 lysis buffer and co-immunoprecipitated with Anti-GFP polyclonal antibody. For ProLabel detection of protein-protein interaction, the immunoprecipitates were resuspended in lysis/complementation buffer and transferred to a well in a 96-well assay plate (Costar, Corning, NY). To each well, the substrate mix was added, and ProLabel activity was measured using the POLARstar OPTIMA multidetection microplate reader (BMG Labtech).
Transient knockdown of LEDGF/p75 in 293T cells
Duplex stealth RNA interference (RNAi) for LEDGF and scrambled RNAi were purchased from Invitrogen. 4 × 105 293T cells were seeded per well in a 6-well plate for 24 h and then cells were transfected with 20 nM siRNA oligonucleotides (Stealth RNAi; Invitrogen) directed against PSIP1/LEDGF/p75 mRNA using Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen). Synthetic siRNA was designed with the following target and sequence: PSIP1HSS146003, targeting nucleotides 541 to 565 (5'UAAUGAAGGUUUAUGGGAGAUAGAU3'). In parallel, a scramble siRNA was used as negative control. The efficiency of LEDGF knockdown was monitored by WB at different time points (48 h, 72 h, 96 h, 120 h).
The production and transduction of lentivirus vector containing LEDGF shRNA
To produce stable LEDGF/p75 gene knockdown 293T cell lines, the pLKO.1 lentiviral vector comprising siRNA hairpin targeting nucleotides of LEDGF/p75 mRNA was purchased from Open Biosystems. The hairpin structure contains a 21-bp stem, 5-nt loops, and 5' CCGG and 3' TTTTTG overhangs. The shRNA sequence RHS3979-97063117 targets the corresponding LEDGF/p75 mRNA nucleotides 860-880, and its stem-loop sequence was CCGGGCAGCTACAGAAGTCAAGATTCTCGAGAATCTTGACTTCTGTAGCTGCTTTTTG. The lentiviral particles harboring LEDGF/p75 shRNA were produced by co-transfecting the shRNA pLKO.1 vector, packaging DNA plasmid Δ8.2 and vesicular stomatitis virus G (VSVG) plasmid into 293T cells. After 48 h, supernatants containing lentiviral vectors were pelleted by ultracentrifugation (32,000 rpm at 4°C for 1 h) and stored in aliquots at -80°C.
To obtain stable LEDGF shRNA expressing cell lines, 293T cells were transduced with the shRNA LEDGF lentiviral vector for 48 h and then selected with 2 μg/mL puromycin for one week. Silencing of LEDGF/p75 was determined by WB analysis with an anti-LEDGF antibody. Detection of endogenous beta-actin was used for normalization of sample loading.
Virus Production and Infection
A VSV-G pseudotyped single-cycle replicating virus was produced in 293T cells as described previously [24, 28]. Briefly, 293T cells were co-transfected with an RT/IN/Env-deleted HIV-1 provirus NLlucΔBglΔRI, each CMV-Vpr-RT-IN (wt/mutant) expression plasmid and a VSV-G expression plasmid. After 48 h of transfection, viruses were collected and concentrated from the supernatants by ultracentrifugation at 35,000 RPM for 2 h. Virus titers were quantified using HIV-1 p24 Antigen Capture Assay Kit (purchased from the NCI-Frederick AIDS Vaccine Program). Equal amounts of viruses (adjusted by virion-associated p24 levels) were used to infect C8166 T cells overnight at 37°C. At 48 h post-infection, 1 × 106 cells from each sample were collected and lysed with 50 μL of luciferase lysis buffer (Fisher Scientific Inc). A 10 μL aliquot of cell lysate was subjected to the luciferase assay by using a POLARstar OPTIMA (BMG LABTECH, Germany), and the luciferase activity was valued as relative light units (RLU).
Measurement of reverse transcription by quantitative PCR analysis
After production of the VSV-G pseudotyped single-cycle replicating viruses, equal amounts of virus (adjusted by virion-associated p24 levels) were treated with 340 IU/mL DNase (Roche Molecular Biochemicals) for 1 h at 37°C to remove residual plasmid DNA and then used to infect C8166 CD4+ T cells. For negative control (NC), prior to DNase treatment, wt virus was inactivated by incubating at 70°C for 0.5 h. The DNA was isolated from 1 × 106 C8166T cells at 12 h post-infection using QIAamp® DNA blood kit (Qiagen sciences, Maryland, USA) following the manufacturer's instruction. The reverse transcription activity of HIV-1 in the infected cells was analyzed by quantifying the total HIV cDNA by using the qPCR technique. The qPCR was performed on Mx3000P detection system (Stratagene, CA) using LightCycler FastStart DNA Master SYBR Green I master mix (Roche diagnostics, Germany) along with forward (5'-tac tga cgc tct cgc acc-3') and reverse (5'-tct cga cgc agg act cg-3') primers targeted to the 5' end of the LTR and Gag region of the HIV-1 Bru genome . The optimized thermal conditions used in the qPCR were as follows: initial hot start (95°C for 15 min) followed by 35 to 40 cycles of denaturation (94°C for 30 s), primer annealing (60°C for 30 s) and extension (72°C for 1 min). The total HIV-1 cDNA levels were expressed as copy numbers per cell, with DNA template normalized by the β-globin gene.
Analysis of different HIV-1 IN mutants for their chromatin- and LEDGF/p75-binding
Summary of IN mutant chromatin/LEDGF binding phenotypes
Interaction with LEDGF/p75
Chromatin- and LEDGF/p75-binding analysis of IN double mutants within Loop 170EHLK173
Nuclear localization of IN mutants in COS-7 cells
Knockdown of LEDGF/p75 had no effect on IN's chromatin binding
Next, we checked whether LEDGF/p75 depletion has an effect on IN chromatin binding. To do so, the LEDGF/p75-KD 293T cells were transfected with YFP-INwt, and after 24 h of transfection, cells were treated with MG-132, a proteasome inhibitor, to prevent IN degradation. Cells were processed for IN chromatin binding analysis at 48 h post transfection, as described above. Of note, no significant difference in the IN chromatin association was observed between the LEDGF/p75 KD cell line and the mock-transfected cell control (Fig. 5B, upper panel). In parallel, the 293T cells transfected with the YFP-IN V165A mutant, which has been shown to be defective of chromatin binding, was used as a negative control . Thus, our results demonstrated that the LEDGF/p75 KD could not abrogate IN chromatin binding.
Effect of IN 170EHLK173 mutants on HIV-1 infection
While the interaction between IN and viral DNA was extensively investigated by in vitro studies [18, 19, 22, 36–39], less was known for IN interaction with host chromatin under physiological conditions. Interestingly, a large number of recent studies have demonstrated that the cellular factor LEDGF/p75 plays an important role in tethering HIV-1 IN to the transcriptionally active units of host chromatin [40, 41]. However, how IN alone, in the absence of LEDGF/p75, plays a role in chromatin binding needs to be fully understood. In this study, we performed site-directed mutagenic analysis at the C-terminal region of the IN CCD for IN/chromatin binding and IN/LEDGF/p75 interaction. Results showed that several IN mutants including K159P, V165A, V176A, A179P, KR186,7AA and I203P were unable to bind both LEDGF/p75 and host chromatin. The mutants H171A, L172A and EH170,1AA, located in a loop region 170EHLK173 of IN, severely impaired their interaction with LEDGF/p75 but were still able to bind chromatin. Also, our data showed that LEDGF/p75 depletion in cells failed to dissociate IN from chromatin. Furthermore, the single-round HIV-1 replication assay results showed that the viruses harboring IN mutants capable of LEDGF/p75-independent chromatin binding still sustained a low level of infection. All of these data indicate that while LEDGF/p75 is important for productive HIV-1 replication, IN has the ability to bind chromatin in a LEDGF/p75-independent manner and sustain a low level HIV-1 infection.
The results showed that IN mutants K159P, A179P and I203P located at the α-helices 4, 5 and 6 specifically affected both chromatin- and LEDGF/p75-binding abilities. Since introducing proline often bends the amino-acid backbone and affects the secondary structure of the protein, it could be possible that introducing proline mutations disrupts α-helix formation and hampers both chromatin- and LEDGF/p75-binding abilities. Indeed, this could be the case for the IN mutant I203P because another mutant I203A was able to efficiently bind host DNA and LEDGF/p75 (Figs. 1 and 2 compare lane 14 to 15). However, given the fact that both A179P and A179I lost binding to host chromatin, the A179 residue may be directly involved in interacting with host chromatin (Fig. 1 and data not shown for A179I). Nevertheless, the chromatin-binding phenotype of K159P, A179P and I203P IN mutants suggest the involvement of α-helices 4, 5 and 6 of IN in host DNA recognition. Two other IN mutants that need to be addressed are KR186,7AA and F185A. We have previously shown that the IN mutant KR186,7AA was severely impaired in both chromatin- and LEDGF-binding affinities . In this study, we identified another mutant F185A that displayed a significant reduction in the interaction with LEDGF and chromatin, but to a lesser extent than that of KR186,7AA. The K186 and R187 of IN, by crystallographic studies, are known to lie in the dimer-dimer interface of IN [42, 43] and F185 has been implicated for tetramerization of IN . So, mutations at F185, K186 and R187 might affect IN oligomerization and further impair its chromatin binding affinity. In addition, a recent study by Merad H et al. revealed that a helix-turn-helix (HTH) (residues 149-186) motif consists of two helices (helix 4 and helix 5) and that the loop in between is involved in recognition of viral DNA . Interestingly, in our study, IN mutants K159A, V165A, V176A, A179P, KR186,7AA are located within this region and were identified as chromatin-binding defective mutants. Thus, the chromosomal attachment site within the IN CCD may also center on IN α-helix 4 to α-helix 5, and this HTH motif could be critical for the recognition of both viral and host DNA. However, how IN recognizes and binds both viral and host DNA sequence to form an active integration complex remains an open question and requires more detailed computational, experimental and structural investigations.
However, the functional roles of LEDGF/p75 and its potential correlation with chromatin binding of IN are of interest in our present study. It is well established that LEDGF/p75 serves as an IN-to-chromatin tethering factor, driving PICs to transcriptionally active regions of host chromosomes [5, 14]. Our previous results showed that chromatin binding defective IN mutants (V165A, A179P, KR186,7AA) also fail to interact with LEDGF/p75, suggesting that LEDGF-binding of IN might be linked to the chromatin-binding affinity of IN . Here, we attempted to select more IN mutants to map both chromatin- and LEDGF/p75-binding sites within the CCD of IN. Results showed that most of the IN mutants tested in this study lost both chromatin-binding and LEDGF/p75-interacting abilities, highlighting the importance of LEDGF/p75 as a tethering factor for IN chromatin targeting. Interestingly, two IN mutants, H171A and L172A within the CCD of IN, displayed a different phenotype; they could not efficiently interact with LEDGF/p75 yet still could bind chromatin (Fig. 1 and 2, see also Table 1). This raises the possibility that the HIV-1 IN may still be able to target chromatin in the absence of LEDGF/p75 association. Because H171 and L172 are located within or close to the loci of IN/LEDGF interface (α4/5 connector residues 166-171) , we next focused on detailed chromatin- and LEDGF-binding affinities within the IN region 170EHLK173. For this purpose, four IN double mutants, EH170,1AA, EK170,3AA, HL171,2AA and HK171,3AA, were tested. Indeed, it was shown again that the IN mutant EH170,1AA showed relatively high affinity with host chromatin but was unable to bind LEDGF/p75 effectively, while the IN mutant HL171,2AA had defects on both the chromatin- and LEDGF-binding affinities (Fig. 3). These results suggest that the HIV-1 IN is able to bind chromatin independently of LEDGF/p75.
Because the IN mutants H171A, L172A and EH170,1AA bound to chromatin but not LEDGF/p75, we further reconfirmed the LEDGF/p75 independent chromatin binding of wild type IN using the LEDGF/p75-KD cells. Our results showed that the efficient knockdown of LEDGF/p75 had no significant effect on IN to chromatin-association, suggesting that the chromatin binding of IN might still take place in the absence of LEDGF/p75. Meanwhile, we ruled out the possible effect of LEDGF/p75 knockdown on nuclear translocation of HIV-1 with wild type IN by observing the intracellular localization of all the IN fusion proteins using immunostaining, which is indeed consistent with the previous observation . Most likely, the IN is still able to target chromatin without preferential targeting sites in the absence of LEDGF/p75. Consistently, previous studies have highlighted that the role of LEDGF/p75 during HIV-1 integration is advantageous to HIV-1 integration but could be nonessential to the process of integration [5, 45]. We speculate that, without the LEDGF/p75 tethering, IN might still be able to bind chromatin, but it might lack the preferential selection site. Also, it is possible that other unknown cellular factor(s) might contribute to the chromatin targeting of IN; such proteins should harbor both DNA-binding and IN-binding domains similar to that of LEDGF/p75. Further efforts are underway to seek new cellular partners involved in IN-to-chromatin targeting.
In an attempt to correlate IN chromatin-binding ability to its effect on virus infection, we introduced IN mutants EH170,1AA, EK170,3AA or HL171,2AA into a VSV-G pseudotyped HIV-1 single cycle replicating virus and investigated their effects on HIV-1 infection. As expected, viruses containing the IN HL171,2AA mutation, which lost both LEDGF/p75- and chromatin-binding abilities, are unable to replicate (Fig. 6). This result is consistent with previous reports in which the impaired integration of proviral DNA into host cell chromatin accounted for the replication defect of the L172 mutant virus [46, 47]. Interestingly, another batch of viruses harboring the IN EH170,1AA mutation, which fail to associate with LEDGF/p75 but are still able to interact with chromatin, retain the infectivity towards the susceptible cell lines, although at a low efficiency. This suggests that the chromatin association of IN, rather than LEDGF/p75 binding, is essential for HIV-1 infection. These results are consistent with the previous study by Shun and his co-workers in which the LEDGF-null mouse embryo fibroblasts were able to support approximately 10% of HIV-1 integration compared to control cells . These results again highlighted the importance of LEDGF/p75-binding property of IN during HIV-1 replication. It is possible that the LEDGF-independent chromatin binding of IN is still able to target viral PICs to host chromatin, but, without the escort of LEDGF/p75, such IN-mediated "nonspecific" chromatin binding is less efficient and/or could not efficiently target viral PICs to transcriptionally active sites in the chromatin and mediate a productive viral replication. Another interesting question is how IN is still able to interact with host chromatin under a very low level of LEDGF/p75. Whether it is through IN directly binding to host DNA or whether it requires other undefined cofactor(s) for this process remains unclear and requires more detailed study. Successful elucidation of the mechanism underlying how HIV-1 IN possesses a LEDGF/p75-independent chromatin binding and identification of other IN-interacting cofactors involved in this process will contribute to a better understanding of the action of IN during HIV-1 replication and aid in development of efficient and comprehensive anti-HIV strategies.
We thank Dr. A. Engelman for providing the pFT-1-LEDGF through the AIDS Research Reference Reagent Program, Division of AIDS, NIAID, NIH. We are grateful to Binhua Liang for his advice on sequence alignment. YF. Zheng and K. Danappa Jayappa are recipients of Manitoba Health Research Council/Manitoba Institute of Child Health (MHRC/MICH) scholarship. X-J. Yao is a recipient of the Basic Science Career Development Research Award from The Manitoba Medical Service Foundation. This work was supported by CIHR grants (HOP-63013 and HOP-81180) and the Leaders Opportunity Fund Award from Canadian Foundation of Innovation (CFI) to X-J. Yao.
- Li M, Mizuuchi M, Burke TR Jr, Craigie R: Retroviral DNA integration: reaction pathway and critical intermediates. Embo J 2006, 25: 1295-1304. 10.1038/sj.emboj.7601005PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Engelman A, Mizuuchi K, Craigie R: HIV-1 DNA integration: mechanism of viral DNA cleavage and DNA strand transfer. Cell 1991, 67: 1211-1221. 10.1016/0092-8674(91)90297-CPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Al-Mawsawi LQ, Neamati N: Blocking interactions between HIV-1 integrase and cellular cofactors: an emerging anti-retroviral strategy. Trends Pharmacol Sci 2007, 28: 526-535. 10.1016/j.tips.2007.09.005PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Van Maele B, Debyser Z: HIV-1 integration: an interplay between HIV-1 integrase, cellular and viral proteins. AIDS Rev 2005, 7: 26-43.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Llano M, Vanegas M, Fregoso O, Saenz D, Chung S, Peretz M, Poeschla EM: LEDGF/p75 determines cellular trafficking of diverse lentiviral but not murine oncoretroviral integrase proteins and is a component of functional lentiviral preintegration complexes. J Virol 2004, 78: 9524-9537. 10.1128/JVI.78.17.9524-9537.2004PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Vandegraaff N, Devroe E, Turlure F, Silver PA, Engelman A: Biochemical and genetic analyses of integrase-interacting proteins lens epithelium-derived growth factor (LEDGF)/p75 and hepatoma-derived growth factor related protein 2 (HRP2) in preintegration complex function and HIV-1 replication. Virology 2006, 346: 415-426. 10.1016/j.virol.2005.11.022PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ge H, Si Y, Roeder RG: Isolation of cDNAs encoding novel transcription coactivators p52 and p75 reveals an alternate regulatory mechanism of transcriptional activation. Embo J 1998, 17: 6723-6729. 10.1093/emboj/17.22.6723PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Singh SB, Felock P, Hazuda DJ: Chemical and enzymatic modifications of integric acid and HIV-1 integrase inhibitory activity. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 2000, 10: 235-238. 10.1016/S0960-894X(99)00666-6PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Cherepanov P, Ambrosio AL, Rahman S, Ellenberger T, Engelman A: Structural basis for the recognition between HIV-1 integrase and transcriptional coactivator p75. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2005, 102: 17308-17313. 10.1073/pnas.0506924102PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Vanegas M, Llano M, Delgado S, Thompson D, Peretz M, Poeschla E: Identification of the LEDGF/p75 HIV-1 integrase-interaction domain and NLS reveals NLS-independent chromatin tethering. J Cell Sci 2005, 118: 1733-1743. 10.1242/jcs.02299PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Rahman S, Lu R, Vandegraaff N, Cherepanov P, Engelman A: Structure-based mutagenesis of the integrase-LEDGF/p75 interface uncouples a strict correlation between in vitro protein binding and HIV-1 fitness. Virology 2007, 357: 79-90. 10.1016/j.virol.2006.08.011PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Busschots K, Voet A, De Maeyer M, Rain JC, Emiliani S, Benarous R, Desender L, Debyser Z, Christ F: Identification of the LEDGF/p75 binding site in HIV-1 integrase. J Mol Biol 2007, 365: 1480-1492. 10.1016/j.jmb.2006.10.094PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Emiliani S, Mousnier A, Busschots K, Maroun M, Van Maele B, Tempe D, Vandekerckhove L, Moisant F, Ben-Slama L, Witvrouw M, et al.: Integrase mutants defective for interaction with LEDGF/p75 are impaired in chromosome tethering and HIV-1 replication. J Biol Chem 2005, 280: 25517-25523. 10.1074/jbc.M501378200PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Maertens G, Cherepanov P, Pluymers W, Busschots K, De Clercq E, Debyser Z, Engelborghs Y: LEDGF/p75 is essential for nuclear and chromosomal targeting of HIV-1 integrase in human cells. J Biol Chem 2003, 278: 33528-33539. 10.1074/jbc.M303594200PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- McKee CJ, Kessl JJ, Shkriabai N, Dar MJ, Engelman A, Kvaratskhelia M: Dynamic modulation of HIV-1 integrase structure and function by cellular lens epithelium-derived growth factor (LEDGF) protein. J Biol Chem 2008, 283: 31802-31812. 10.1074/jbc.M805843200PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Michel F, Crucifix C, Granger F, Eiler S, Mouscadet JF, Korolev S, Agapkina J, Ziganshin R, Gottikh M, Nazabal A, et al.: Structural basis for HIV-1 DNA integration in the human genome, role of the LEDGF/P75 cofactor. Embo J 2009, 28: 980-991. 10.1038/emboj.2009.41PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Turlure F, Maertens G, Rahman S, Cherepanov P, Engelman A: A tripartite DNA-binding element, comprised of the nuclear localization signal and two AT-hook motifs, mediates the association of LEDGF/p75 with chromatin in vivo. Nucleic Acids Res 2006, 34: 1653-1675. 10.1093/nar/gkl052PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Dolan J, Chen A, Weber IT, Harrison RW, Leis J: Defining the DNA substrate binding sites on HIV-1 integrase. J Mol Biol 2009, 385: 568-579. 10.1016/j.jmb.2008.10.083PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Merad H, Porumb H, Zargarian L, Rene B, Hobaika Z, Maroun RG, Mauffret O, Fermandjian S: An unusual helix turn helix motif in the catalytic core of HIV-1 integrase binds viral DNA and LEDGF. PLoS ONE 2009, 4: e4081. 10.1371/journal.pone.0004081PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zhao Z, McKee CJ, Kessl JJ, Santos WL, Daigle JE, Engelman A, Verdine G, Kvaratskhelia M: Subunit-specific protein footprinting reveals significant structural rearrangements and a role for N-terminal Lys-14 of HIV-1 Integrase during viral DNA binding. J Biol Chem 2008, 283: 5632-5641. 10.1074/jbc.M705241200PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Engelman A, Hickman AB, Craigie R: The core and carboxyl-terminal domains of the integrase protein of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 each contribute to nonspecific DNA binding. J Virol 1994, 68: 5911-5917.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Heuer TS, Brown PO: Photo-cross-linking studies suggest a model for the architecture of an active human immunodeficiency virus type 1 integrase-DNA complex. Biochemistry 1998, 37: 6667-6678. 10.1021/bi972949cPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Podtelezhnikov AA, Gao K, Bushman FD, McCammon JA: Modeling HIV-1 integrase complexes based on their hydrodynamic properties. Biopolymers 2003, 68: 110-120. 10.1002/bip.10217PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Xu Z, Zheng Y, Ao Z, Clement M, Mouland AJ, Kalpana GV, Belhumeur P, Cohen EA, Yao X: Contribution of the C-terminal region within the catalytic core domain of HIV-1 integrase to yeast lethality, chromatin binding and viral replication. Retrovirology 2008, 5: 102. 10.1186/1742-4690-5-102PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Berthoux L, Sebastian S, Muesing MA, Luban J: The role of lysine 186 in HIV-1 integrase multimerization. Virology 2007, 364: 227-236. 10.1016/j.virol.2007.02.029PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Cherepanov P, Sun ZY, Rahman S, Maertens G, Wagner G, Engelman A: Solution structure of the HIV-1 integrase-binding domain in LEDGF/p75. Nat Struct Mol Biol 2005, 12: 526-532. 10.1038/nsmb937PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Yao XJ, Subbramanian RA, Rougeau N, Boisvert F, Bergeron D, Cohen EA: Mutagenic analysis of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 Vpr: role of a predicted N-terminal alpha-helical structure in Vpr nuclear localization and virion incorporation. J Virol 1995, 69: 7032-7044.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Ao Z, Fowke KR, Cohen EA, Yao X: Contribution of the C-terminal tri-lysine regions of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 integrase for efficient reverse transcription and viral DNA nuclear import. Retrovirology 2005, 2: 62. 10.1186/1742-4690-2-62PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Malnati MS, Scarlatti G, Gatto F, Salvatori F, Cassina G, Rutigliano T, Volpi R, Lusso P: A universal real-time PCR assay for the quantification of group-M HIV-1 proviral load. Nat Protoc 2008, 3: 1240-1248. 10.1038/nprot.2008.108PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Jenkins TM, Esposito D, Engelman A, Craigie R: Critical contacts between HIV-1 integrase and viral DNA identified by structure-based analysis and photo-crosslinking. Embo J 1997, 16: 6849-6859. 10.1093/emboj/16.22.6849PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Savarino A: In-Silico docking of HIV-1 integrase inhibitors reveals a novel drug type acting on an enzyme/DNA reaction intermediate. Retrovirology 2007, 4: 21. 10.1186/1742-4690-4-21PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Drake RR, Neamati N, Hong H, Pilon AA, Sunthankar P, Hume SD, Milne GW, Pommier Y: Identification of a nucleotide binding site in HIV-1 integrase. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1998, 95: 4170-4175. 10.1073/pnas.95.8.4170PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Meehan AM, Saenz DT, Morrison JH, Garcia-Rivera JA, Peretz M, Llano M, Poeschla EM: LEDGF/p75 proteins with alternative chromatin tethers are functional HIV-1 cofactors. PLoS Pathog 2009, 5: e1000522. 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000522PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Shun MC, Botbol Y, Li X, Di Nunzio F, Daigle JE, Yan N, Lieberman J, Lavigne M, Engelman A: Identification and characterization of PWWP domain residues critical for LEDGF/p75 chromatin binding and human immunodeficiency virus type 1 infectivity. J Virol 2008, 82: 11555-11567. 10.1128/JVI.01561-08PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ao Z, Yao X, Cohen EA: Assessment of the role of the central DNA flap in human immunodeficiency virus type 1 replication by using a single-cycle replication system. J Virol 2004, 78: 3170-3177. 10.1128/JVI.78.6.3170-3177.2004PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Mazumder A, Neamati N, Pilon AA, Sunder S, Pommier Y: Chemical trapping of ternary complexes of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 integrase, divalent metal, and DNA substrates containing an abasic site. Implications for the role of lysine 136 in DNA binding. J Biol Chem 1996, 271: 27330-27338. 10.1074/jbc.271.44.27330PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Heuer TS, Brown PO: Mapping features of HIV-1 integrase near selected sites on viral and target DNA molecules in an active enzyme-DNA complex by photo-cross-linking. Biochemistry 1997, 36: 10655-10665. 10.1021/bi970782hPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Esposito D, Craigie R: Sequence specificity of viral end DNA binding by HIV-1 integrase reveals critical regions for protein-DNA interaction. Embo J 1998, 17: 5832-5843. 10.1093/emboj/17.19.5832PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gao K, Butler SL, Bushman F: Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 integrase: arrangement of protein domains in active cDNA complexes. Embo J 2001, 20: 3565-3576. 10.1093/emboj/20.13.3565PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Shun MC, Raghavendra NK, Vandegraaff N, Daigle JE, Hughes S, Kellam P, Cherepanov P, Engelman A: LEDGF/p75 functions downstream from preintegration complex formation to effect gene-specific HIV-1 integration. Genes Dev 2007, 21: 1767-1778. 10.1101/gad.1565107PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ciuffi A, Llano M, Poeschla E, Hoffmann C, Leipzig J, Shinn P, Ecker JR, Bushman F: A role for LEDGF/p75 in targeting HIV DNA integration. Nat Med 2005, 11: 1287-1289. 10.1038/nm1329PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wang JY, Ling H, Yang W, Craigie R: Structure of a two-domain fragment of HIV-1 integrase: implications for domain organization in the intact protein. Embo J 2001, 20: 7333-7343. 10.1093/emboj/20.24.7333PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Chen JC, Krucinski J, Miercke LJ, Finer-Moore JS, Tang AH, Leavitt AD, Stroud RM: Crystal structure of the HIV-1 integrase catalytic core and C-terminal domains: a model for viral DNA binding. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2000, 97: 8233-8238. 10.1073/pnas.150220297PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Al-Mawsawi LQ, Hombrouck A, Dayam R, Debyser Z, Neamati N: Four-tiered pi interaction at the dimeric interface of HIV-1 integrase critical for DNA integration and viral infectivity. Virology 2008, 377: 355-363. 10.1016/j.virol.2008.04.030PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zielske SP, Stevenson M: Modest but reproducible inhibition of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 infection in macrophages following LEDGFp75 silencing. J Virol 2006, 80: 7275-7280. 10.1128/JVI.02470-05PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Priet S, Navarro JM, Querat G, Sire J: Reversion of the lethal phenotype of an HIV-1 integrase mutant virus by overexpression of the same integrase mutant protein. J Biol Chem 2003, 278: 20724-20730. 10.1074/jbc.M301768200PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sayasith K, Sauve G, Yelle J: Characterization of mutant HIV-1 integrase carrying amino acid changes in the catalytic domain. Mol Cells 2000, 10: 525-532. 10.1007/s10059-000-0525-3PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.