- Open Access
Extra-cellular release and blood diffusion of BART viral micro-RNAs produced by EBV-infected nasopharyngeal carcinoma cells
© Gourzones et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010
- Received: 24 August 2010
- Accepted: 15 October 2010
- Published: 15 October 2010
Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is a human epithelial malignancy consistently associated with the Epstein-Barr virus. The viral genome is contained in the nuclei of all malignant cells with abundant transcription of a family of viral microRNAs called BART miRNAs. MicroRNAs are well known intra-cellular regulatory elements of gene expression. In addition, they are often exported in the extra-cellular space and sometimes transferred in recipient cells distinct from the producer cells. Extra-cellular transport of the microRNAs is facilitated by various processes including association with protective proteins and packaging in secreted nanovesicles called exosomes. Presence of microRNAS produced by malignant cells has been reported in the blood and saliva of tumor-bearing patients, especially patients diagnosed with glioblastoma or ovarian carcinoma. In this context, it was decided to investigate extra-cellular release of BART miRNAs by NPC cells and their possible detection in the blood of NPC patients. To address this question, we investigated by quantitative RT-PCR the status of 5 microRNAs from the BART family in exosomes released by NPC cells in vitro as well as in plasma samples from NPC xenografted nude mice and NPC patients.
We report that the BART miRNAs are released in the extra-cellular space by NPC cells being associated, at least to a large extent, with secreted exosomes. They are detected with a good selectivity in plasma samples from NPC xenografted nude mice as well as NPC patients.
Viral BART miRNAs are secreted by NPC cells in vitro and in vivo. They have enough stability to diffuse from the tumor site to the peripheral blood. This study provides a basis to explore their potential as a source of novel tumor biomarkers and their possible role in communications between malignant and non-malignant cells.
- Lymphoblastoid Cell Line
- Human Plasma Sample
- Lymphoid Cell Line
- Bart miRNAs
- Larynx Squamous Cell Carcinoma
Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is one of the most frequent virus-related malignancies in humans, following liver carcinomas associated to HBV and HCV and cervix carcinoma associated to HPV. This epithelial malignancy arises from the epithelium lining the upper part of the pharynx behind the nasal cavities. NPC incidence is variable depending on the geographic area . It occurs at a very high incidence in Southern China, especially in the Guangdong and Guangxi provinces (25 cases/100 000/year) whereas it is at a low incidence in Europe or North America (about 1 case/100 000/year). There are areas of intermediate incidence whose extension has long been underappreciated and which include vast regions of South East Asia (Indonesia, Vietnam, Philippines) and North Africa (Tunisia, Algeria, Morocco) (4 to 8 cases/100 000/year). Incidence is rising in some places in Europe because of large numbers of incoming overseas immigrants. Although EBV is not the unique etiological factor of NPC, it has a role in tumor development in combination with dietary factors (consumption of traditional preserved food) and genetic predisposition . Regardless of patient geographic origin, the EBV genome is contained in the nuclei of all malignant cells in virtually all NPCs (except a very small fringe of differentiated squamous tumors in Europe and North America). Most viral genes are silent but some of them are consistently expressed including genes encoding for two clusters of microRNAs called BART miRNAs [3, 4].
MicroRNAs are double strand RNAs of short size (20 to 25 nt) which result from maturation of large primary transcripts and have important regulatory functions in gene expression. When they are incorporated to a multimolecular complex called RISC, they have the power to interact with target mRNAs inducing their degradation or slowing their translation . Initial studies on microRNAs have been mainly focused on their functions inside the producer cells. Recently, it has been shown that microRNAs are often released in the extra-cellular medium. Moreover, they can enter cells distinct from producing cells and modify gene expression in recipient cells [6–8]. Extra-cellular transport of microRNAs is facilitated by various processes such as association with protective proteins or packaging in exosomes [9, 10]. Exosomes are nanovesicles of 50 to 100 nm in diameter which are derived from the late endosomal compartment and secreted by most eukaryotic cell types . Exosomes behave as extra-cellular carriers of microRNAs that they can deliver to recipient cells in vitro and probably also in vivo[7, 8]. Detection of tumor microRNAs has been reported in the plasma of tumor-bearing patients for example patients affected by glioblastoma and ovarian carcinomas [12, 13].
Three clusters of viral microRNAs encoded by the EBV genome have been identified in the past years . One of them maps to the Bam H1 H open reading frame 1 (BHRF1) of the viral genome and is therefore called the BHRF1 cluster. The two others map to the Bam H1 A region. They are derived from primary RNAs called BARTs because they are transcribed rightward from an ORF of the Bam H1 A region (Bam H1 A rightward transcripts) . Each BART cluster derives from a distinct pair of introns of the BART primary transcripts: introns 1 and 2 (cluster 1 - coordinates 138480 - 140558) and introns 3 and 4 (cluster 2 - coordinates 146334 - 149581). BHRF1 miRNAs are abundant in some EBV-infected lymphoid cell lines but they are absent or scarce in NPC cells. In contrast, BART primary transcripts and microRNAs are extremely abundant in NPC cells [4, 14–16]. So far, however, it is not known whether the BART microRNAs (BART miRNAs) are secreted by NPC cells and whether they can be detected in the plasma and body fluids of NPC patients.
The aim of this study was to investigate secretion of BART miRNAs by NPC cells and their diffusion in the plasma of NPC-xenografted mice and NPC patients. We demonstrate that BART miRNAs are secreted by NPC cells in vitro in association with exosomes (at least a fraction of them). Moreover BART miRNAs are detected in the plasma of NPC-xenografted mice or NPC patients, thus appearing as a potential source of novel tumor biomarkers.
Detection of BART miRNAs in xenografted NPC tumors
Detection of BART miRNAs in exosomes released by NPC cells in vitro
Detection of BART miRNAs in the plasma of xenografted NPC- bearing mice
Detection of BART miRNAs in plasma samples from xenografted mice
Tumor mass/Body mass (average ratio)
Plasma DNA viral load (copies/ml)
Detection of BART miRNAs in the plasma of NPC patients
Clinical and biological characteristics of human subjects investigated for detection of plasma BART miRNAs
Age-sex- Country of origin
Tumor histological type (1)
Plasma viral DNA load (copies/ml)
2 -ΔCt X1000
EBER detection on tumor sections (3)
EBV serology Positive if > 0.2 Negative if < 0.1 (3)
NON-NPC TUMOR CARRIERS
Multiple bone metastases of unknown primary
Not Applicable (NA)
Larynx squamous cell carcinoma
In this study, we intended to investigate whether BART miRNAs are released in the extra-cellular medium by NPC cells and whether they are transported from the tumor site to circulating blood. Our data provide clear evidence that several BART miRNAs are secreted by C15 NPC cells in vitro in association with exosomes (Figure 3). Investigations of plasma samples in xenografted mice demonstrate that extra-cellular release of BART miRNAs also occurs in vivo and support the idea that they have enough stability and mobility to reach circulating blood (Figure 4). The data obtained from plasma samples collected in NPC patients are consistent with this conclusion (Figure 5).
Our study did not primarily intend to make quantification of BART miRNAs in various tumor backgrounds, however our results suggest that there are wide variations in the relative amounts of these microRNAs in NPC tumor lines. Except for miR-BART12, the highest concentrations of BART miRNAs were found in the C15 tumor with a slightly lower level in C666-1 and a much lower level in the C17 xenograft. These results are consistent with previous reports dealing with BART miRNAs or their precursors [14, 24]. The low amount of BART miRNAs in the C17 xenograft might be related to its low number of EBV genome (about 2 copies per cell). However, according to Pratt et al. (2009) the amount of BART miRNAs is rarely correlated to the number of viral templates in latently EBV-infected cells . In contrast with the Daudi lymphoid cell line, the NAD + C15 LCL - which is latently infected by an EBV isolate derived from the C15 tumor - also has substantial expression of the BART miRNAs with a profile somehow similar to the profile of C15. This could suggest that the viral genotype is more important than the cell background to determine the extent of BART miRNA expression.
Regardless of the RNA source, mir-BART7-3p consistently had the highest relative concentration among the 5 BART miRNAs of our panel. This confirms data reported by Pratt et al. . This quantitative difference was even more marked in exosomes than in tumor RNAs, suggesting that miR-BART7-3p is produced at a higher level or is more stable than other BART miRNAs and possibly more efficiently packaged into exosomes.
In terms of diagnosis and patient monitoring, plasma BART miRNAs might become an interesting source of novel biomarkers. High concentrations of miR BART7-3p were detected in plasma samples from xenografted mice for 2 out of 3 NPC tumor lines as well as in plasma samples from 4 out of 5 NPC patients (Tables 1 and 2). We can only speculate about the absence or low level of miR-BART7-3p in the plasma of the NPC patient HEP 1. It might be the consequence of a relatively low tumor mass. It is noteworthy that a significant level of miR-BART7 was detected in the plasma from one NPC patient (EXO 32) in the absence of detectable EBV DNA in the same sample. This suggests that concomitant exploration of plasma EBV DNA and BART miRNAs will have the potential to provide distinct and complementary information about the tumor phenotype.
Additional investigations will be required on patient plasma samples - both NPC and controls - in order to address 2 questions: 1) Are concentrations of BART miRNAs consistently greater in the plasma of NPC patients by comparison with healthy carriers and patients bearing non-NPC tumors ? 2) Under which form, the BART miRNAs are transported in the plasma of NPC patients. Regarding this last question, recent publications suggest that there are two major modes of transport for extra-cellular microRNAs: either in a soluble form linked to proteins or packaged in nanoparticules, especially exosomes . Some of our preliminary data are in favour of plasma BART miRNAs existing under both forms, a point that will deserve further investigations on a larger group of patients.
In terms of physiopathology, the finding of stable extra-cellular BART miRNAs suggests that they can play a role in cell-cell communications, for example communications between malignant and stromal cells. Horizontal transfers of microRNAs with impact on gene expression in recipient cells has already been demonstrated in vitro[6–8]. Exploring in vivo transfer of BART miRNAs to stromal cells will probably require investigations on tumor tissue sections . If the hypothesis of microRNA horizontal transfers in vivo is confirmed, it will have important implications for our understanding of stromal proliferation, angiogenesis, immune escape and possibly metastatic processes. Elucidation of the cellular targets of BART miRNAs will be important in this respect. The pro-apoptotic gene encoding the PUMA protein has been identified as a target for miR-BART5; other cellular genes down-regulated by BART miRNAs will be probably identified in a near future .
This study provides the proof of principle that the BART miRNAs are secreted by NPC cells in vitro and in vivo and can diffuse from the tumor site to the blood stream. It provides the rationale and some methodological clues for comparative detection and quantification of plasma BART miRNAs in series of NPC patients and control individuals.
Tumor xenografts and cell lines
C15 and C17 are xenografted EBV-positive NPC tumor lines permanently propagated by subcutaneous passage into nude mice . Suspensions of NPC cells were obtained by dispersion of xenografted tumors using type II collagenase, sometimes combined with trypsin pre-treatment, as previously described . C666-1 is an EBV-positive NPC tumor line which has been adapted to in vitro culture . It was grown in RPMI supplemented with 25 mM Hepes and 7.5% FCS. Alternatively C666-1 cells were injected sub-cutaneously into nude mice for obtention of xenografted tumors (3 million cells mixed with 100 μl culture medium and 100 μl Matrigel, BD Biosciences, Le Pont-de-Claix, France). All experiments on xenografted NPC tumors were conducted in the animal facility of the Institut de Cancérologie Gustave Roussy, according to institutional guidelines. Daudi is an EBV-positive Burkitt lymphoma cell line . NAD+C15 is a lymphoblastoid cell line (LCL) resulting from transformation of B lymphocytes from a normal adult donor by the C15 EBV-strain . Daudi and NAD+ C15 were grown in RPMI supplemented with 10% FCS. The HeLa cervix carcinoma cell line was cultured in DMEM with 5% FCS.
In vitro production of conditioned culture media containing exosomes
Cells of various types were incubated at appropriate concentrations in culture medium supplemented with 1.5% fetal calf serum (FCS) for 48 h, at 37°C under 5% CO2. C15 and C17 NPC cells were obtained by dispersion of xenografted tumors and incubated in 24 well plates at 1.2 million cells/well in 1.5 ml RPMI medium. HeLa cells were grown to 70% confluency in 175 cm2 flasks and then incubated in 20 ml culture medium (DMEM). Daudi and NAD+C15 cells were incubated at 1 million cells/ml in RPMI (100 million cells/100 ml culture medium/175 cm2 flasks). Following collection, conditioned media were clarified by centrifugation at 300 g for 10 min and at 1890 g for 15 minutes at 4°C to remove biggest cell remnants and debris and frozen at - 80°C.
Purification of exosomes from culture media using a sucrose gradient
This procedure was adapted from the method described by Lamparski et al. . All steps were performed at 4°C. Thawed conditioned culture supernatants (at least 400 ml) were first clarified by a centrifugation at 12 000 g for 35 min and then subjected to ultracentrifugation at 66 000 g for 2 h using a Ti45 Beckman rotor, resulting in a pellet designated as "nano-material pellet". Exosomes contained in this pellet were further purified by flotation on a cushion made of a sucrose solution in deuterium oxide (D2O). Practically, the nano-material pellet was redissolved in filtrated PBS (2 × 9 ml for an initial volume of 400 ml supernatant). One ml of sucrose/D2O solution (20 mM Tris/30% sucrose/D2O pH 7.4) was layed down carefully under 9 ml of nano-material solution at the bottom of a SW41 Ti polycarbonate tube. This two phase discontinuous gradient was subjected to ultracentrifugation at 76 000 g for 75 min on a SW41 Ti Beckman rotor. The faint band containing the exosomes at the surface of the cushion was then collected without disturbing the pellet. The exosomes were diluted 1:5 in PBS and pelleted by ultracentrifugation at 110 000 g in a SW41 Ti rotor for 90 min. Two additional washing steps were performed in a smaller volume (ultracentrifugation at 110 000 g using a TLA100.3 Beckman rotor). Washed exosomes were then processed for protein or RNA extraction. Exosome proteins were extracted in 20 μl of RIPA buffer (150 mM NaCl 5M, 50 mM Tris HCl pH:7,4, 5 mM EDTA, 0,1% SDS, 0,5% NaDOC, 0,5% NP40) supplemented with Complete anti-proteases (Roche, Basel, Switzerland). RNA extraction was started by solubilization in 800 μl of TRI REAGENT (Molecular Research Center, Cincinnati, OH).
Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM)
For negative staining, exosome fractions were observed after dilution in salt buffer (Tris 10 mM, pH 7.5, NaCl 150). Five microliters of solution was adsorbed onto a 300 mesh copper grid coated with a collodion film covered by a thin carbon film, activated by glow-discharge. After 1 min, grids were washed with aqueous 2% (w/vol) uranyl acetate (Merck, France) and then dried with ashless filter paper (VWR, France). TEM observations were carried out on a Zeiss 912AB transmission electron microscope in filtered low loss mode. Electron micrographs were obtained using a ProScan 1024 HSC digital camera and Soft Imaging Software system.
Exosome characterization by western-blot
Exosome lysates were clarified by centrifugation at 16 000 g for 15 minutes at 4°C. Protein concentrations were determined using the Bradford protein Assay (Biorad Laboratories, Gif-sur-Yvette, France). The protein extracts (12.3 μg) were loaded on a Nupage Bis Tris MiniGel (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, New-Mexico) and migration was performed in non-reducing conditions. Monoclonal antibody against CD63 (TS63) was previously described (Charrin, Rubinstein at al, 2001). The gp96 cytoplasmic protein was detected with a rat monoclonal antibody (Stressgen, Ann Harbor, MI) and β-actin was visualized using a monoclonal antibody (AC-74) from Sigma Aldrich (St. Louis, MO).
Collection, separation and storage of mouse and human plasma samples
Blood samples were collected from mice carrying xenografted NPC tumors under anesthesia by intra-cardiac puncture in EDTA tubes. Eight human plasma samples were collected after signature of informed consent from patients of the Institut de Cancérologie Gustave Roussy or Paris hospitals working in collaboration with this institute (Table 2). Five of these samples were collected from NPC patients prior to any treatment whereas two control samples were obtained from patients bearing non-NPC tumors (one adenocarcinoma of unknown primary and one larynx squamous cell carcinoma). Tumor staging was done according to ESMO (European Society of Medical Oncology) guidelines . Additional control plasma samples were obtained from four healthy donors including three EBV-carriers and one EBV-sero-negative adult. Plasma was separated from blood cells by centrifugation at 1700 g at 20°C for 15 min and frozen at - 80°C.
Assessment of EBV-status in tumor biopsies and in plasma samples
EBERs (Epstein-Barr encoded RNAs) which are small untranslated RNAs from EBV - totally distinct from the viral microRNAs and generally very abundant in NPC cells - were detected on tissue sections from the tumor biopsies by in situ hybridization using commercial kits, mainly from Ventana Medical System (Illkirch, France) . Circulating antibodies directed to VCA (viral capsid antigen) and EBNA (Epstein-Barr nuclear antigen) were assessed in human plasma samples using the Vidas(r) EBV kit from Biomerieux (Lyon, France). EBV viral load in plasma samples was quantified as previously described . Briefly: total DNA was extracted from 200 μl plasma aliquots using the QIAmp blood kit (Qiagen Inc., Courtaboeuf, France). Viral load was then determined by real-time quantitative PCR with primers designed to amplify the thymidine kinase gene of EBV (BXLF1). The copy number was determined by reference to a standard curve based on a tenfold serial dilution of a plasmid containing a unique copy of the BXLF1 genomic segment.
RNA extraction from plasma samples
A variant of the TRIzol method was used to purify total RNA from cells as well as from exosomes produced in vitro according to the manufacturer instructions (TriReagent, Molecular Research Center, Cincinnati, OH). Total RNA from mouse and human plasma samples was extracted using the miRVana miRNA Isolation Kit (Ambion, Austin TX). Plasma was thawed on ice and 100 μl was mixed with 700 μl of Lysis/Binding buffer and incubated at room temperature for 5 min. RNA was then purified according to the manufacturer protocol except that centrifugation was extended to 15 min following acid-phenol/chloroform extraction. RNA was eluted in 100 μl RNAse free water. Finally RNA was quantified using a NanoDrop 1000 spectrophotometer.
Single-mode reverse transcription and real time PCR amplification of EBV BART miRNAs
Detection of BART miRNAs was performed using reagents and protocols of the TaqMan MicroRNA Reverse Transcription and TaqMan MicroRNA Assay kits (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). In this experimental system, reverse transcription (RT) is primed using a stem-loop primer specific of each microRNA. Each stem-loop primer has a specific linear portion complementary of the 3' end of the target microRNA and a loop portion containing a universal invariant target sequence. This RT results in a c-DNA joining the microRNA complementary sequence to the invariant sequence. This c-DNA is amplified by TaqMan PCR using a specific forward primer and a universal reverse primer in the presence of a specific hydrolysis probe. Due to spatial constraint of the stem-loop structure, this system is about 100 times more efficient at amplification of mature microRNAs than their precursors . Reverse transcription was done in 15 μl reaction mix including 90 ng total RNA for cells and exosomes or 9.16 μl of the eluted RNA for plasma samples, 3 μl of the RT primer solution (final concentration: 50 nM), 0.15 μl dNTP (1 mM), 1 μl Multiscribe Reverse transcriptase (3.33 U/μl), 1.50 μl of 10× Buffer, 0.19 μl RNase inhibitor (0.25 U/μl) and nuclease free water. The reaction mix was incubated at 16°C for 30 min, 42°c for 30 min, 85°C for 5 min then frozen at -20°C. Single-mode real-time PCR was performed in a 20 μl reaction volume, containing 1.33 μl RT reaction mix providing the cDNA template, 1 μl of the primer mix including - for a given microRNA - the universal reverse primer (0.7 μM), the specific primer (1.5 μM) and the hydrolysis probe (0.2 μM) (TaqMan MicroRNA Assays, Applied Biosystems, foster City, CA), 10 μl of Fast Start Universal Probe Master mix (Roche, Basel, Switzerland) and RNase-free water. The first cycle included one step of 2 min at 50°C and one step of 10 minutes at 95°C. It was followed by 45 cycles including one step of 15 sec at 95°C and one step of 60 sec at 60°C. The following sets of primers and probes were purchased from Applied Biosystems (TaqMan MicroRNA assays): ebv-miR-BART 1-5p (197199_mat), ebv-miR-BART5 (197237_mat), ebv-miR-BART7-3p (197206), ebv-miR-BART12 (005725), ebv-miR-BART13 (005446), RNU44 (001094), hsa-miR-146a (000468), hsa-miR-21(000397). Amplification reactions were performed in an Applied Biosystems Step One Detection System. Data from RT-Q-PCR were analysed using the comparative CT method with RNU44, hsa-miR-21, hsa-miR-146a as endogenous references for tumor samples, exosomes and plasma samples, respectively. The 2 -ΔCT parameter was used as the index of target microRNA relative concentrations.
Multiplex reverse transcription and real time PCR amplification of BART miRNAs
Detection of EBV-miR-BART 1-5p, 5, 7-3p, 12 and 13 was also performed in a multiplex mode, combining a multiplex Reverse Transcription (RT) stage and a stage of single PCR as recommended by the manufacturer. For this aim, a pool of RT stem-loop primers was made by mixing 6.25 pmoles of each primer. Practically, 25 μl of each primer solution were loaded in a 1.5 ml microtube and dried in a speed vacuum for 1 hour at 50°C. All RT dried primers were then solubilised in 100 μl of RNase free water. The same Taqman MicroRNA reverse Transcription kit used for single RT was used for multiplex with a few modifications: 90 ng input RNA was mixed with 4 μl of the RT primer mix (final concentration: 12.5 nM), 0.4 μl dNTPs (2 mM), 2 μl Multiscribe Reverse Transcriptase (5U/μl), 2 μl 10× RT Buffer, 0.25 μl RNase Inhibitor (0.25U/μl) and nuclease free water to reach a volume of 20 μl. Reaction parameters were identical to those used for single reverse transcription. The resulting cDNA was diluted by adding 180 μl of RNase-free water to the 20 μl reaction mix and stored at -80°C. Subsequent real time PCR was performed in the same conditions as when it was combined to single-mode RT, except that 9 μl of final RT reaction mix was mixed with other PCR reagents instead of 1.33 μl.
We thank Eric Le Cam and Sébastien Pfeffer for helpful discussions. Thanks are also due to the Commission Scientifique des Essais Thérapeutiques and the Centre de Ressources Biologiques of the Institut de Cancérologie Gustave Roussy for their help in collection of clinical samples.
This study was supported by grants from the Agence Nationale de la Recherche (EBV-inter), the Institut National du Cancer (INCa-DHOS translational grant) and the Ligue Nationale contre le Cancer (comité du Val de Marne). CG is supported by the Association pour la Recherche sur le Cancer.
- Descriptive, environmental and genetic epidemiology of nasopharyngeal carcinoma[http://www.landesbioscience.com/curie/chapter/4601/]
- Busson P, Keryer C, Ooka T, Corbex M: EBV-associated nasopharyngeal carcinomas: from epidemiology to virus-targeting strategies. Trends Microbiol 2004, 12: 356-360. 10.1016/j.tim.2004.06.005PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Pfeffer S, Zavolan M, Grasser FA, Chien M, Russo JJ, Ju J, John B, Enright AJ, Marks D, Sander C, Tuschl T: Identification of virus-encoded microRNAs. Science 2004, 304: 734-736. 10.1126/science.1096781PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Cai X, Schafer A, Lu S, Bilello JP, Desrosiers RC, Edwards R, Raab-Traub N, Cullen BR: Epstein-Barr virus microRNAs are evolutionarily conserved and differentially expressed. PLoS Pathog 2006, 2: e23. 10.1371/journal.ppat.0020023PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Trang P, Weidhaas JB, Slack FJ: MicroRNAs as potential cancer therapeutics. Oncogene 2008,27(2):S52-57. 10.1038/onc.2009.353PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Rechavi O, Erlich Y, Amram H, Flomenblit L, Karginov FV, Goldstein I, Hannon GJ, Kloog Y: Cell contact-dependent acquisition of cellular and viral nonautonomously encoded small RNAs. Genes Dev 2009, 23: 1971-1979. 10.1101/gad.1789609PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Pegtel DM, Cosmopoulos K, Thorley-Lawson DA, van Eijndhoven MA, Hopmans ES, Lindenberg JL, de Gruijl TD, Wurdinger T, Middeldorp JM: Functional delivery of viral miRNAs via exosomes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2010, 107: 6328-6333. 10.1073/pnas.0914843107PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kosaka N, Iguchi H, Yoshioka Y, Takeshita F, Matsuki Y, Ochiya T: Secretory mechanisms and intercellular transfer of microRNAs in living cells. J Biol Chem 2010, 285: 17442-17452. 10.1074/jbc.M110.107821PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gibbings DJ, Ciaudo C, Erhardt M, Voinnet O: Multivesicular bodies associate with components of miRNA effector complexes and modulate miRNA activity. Nat Cell Biol 2009, 11: 1143-1149. 10.1038/ncb1929PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wang K, Zhang S, Weber J, Baxter D, Galas DJ: Export of microRNAs and microRNA-protective protein by mammalian cells. Nucleic Acids Res 2010.Google Scholar
- Schorey JS, Bhatnagar S: Exosome function: from tumor immunology to pathogen biology. Traffic 2008, 9: 871-881. 10.1111/j.1600-0854.2008.00734.xPubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Taylor DD, Gercel-Taylor C: MicroRNA signatures of tumor-derived exosomes as diagnostic biomarkers of ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2008, 110: 13-21. 10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.04.033PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Skog J, Wurdinger T, van Rijn S, Meijer DH, Gainche L, Sena-Esteves M, Curry WT Jr, Carter BS, Krichevsky AM, Breakefield XO: Glioblastoma microvesicles transport RNA and proteins that promote tumour growth and provide diagnostic biomarkers. Nat Cell Biol 2008, 10: 1470-1476. 10.1038/ncb1800PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Edwards RH, Marquitz AR, Raab-Traub N: Epstein-Barr virus BART microRNAs are produced from a large intron prior to splicing. J Virol 2008, 82: 9094-9106. 10.1128/JVI.00785-08PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Cosmopoulos K, Pegtel M, Hawkins J, Moffett H, Novina C, Middeldorp J, Thorley-Lawson DA: Comprehensive profiling of Epstein-Barr virus microRNAs in nasopharyngeal carcinoma. J Virol 2009, 83: 2357-2367. 10.1128/JVI.02104-08PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zhu JY, Pfuhl T, Motsch N, Barth S, Nicholls J, Grasser F, Meister G: Identification of novel Epstein-Barr virus microRNA genes from nasopharyngeal carcinomas. J Virol 2009, 83: 3333-3341. 10.1128/JVI.01689-08PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Pratt ZL, Kuzembayeva M, Sengupta S, Sugden B: The microRNAs of Epstein-Barr Virus are expressed at dramatically differing levels among cell lines. Virology 2009, 386: 387-397. 10.1016/j.virol.2009.01.006PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Chen SJ, Chen GH, Chen YH, Liu CY, Chang KP, Chang YS, Chen HC: Characterization of Epstein-Barr virus miRNAome in nasopharyngeal carcinoma by deep sequencing. PLoS One 5:Google Scholar
- Hitt MM, Allday MJ, Hara T, Karran L, Jones MD, Busson P, Tursz T, Ernberg I, Griffin BE: EBV gene expression in an NPC-related tumour. Embo J 1989, 8: 2639-2651.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Valadi H, Ekstrom K, Bossios A, Sjostrand M, Lee JJ, Lotvall JO: Exosome-mediated transfer of mRNAs and microRNAs is a novel mechanism of genetic exchange between cells. Nat Cell Biol 2007, 9: 654-659. 10.1038/ncb1596PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Klibi J, Niki T, Riedel A, Pioche-Durieu C, Souquere S, Rubinstein E, Moulec SL, Guigay J, Hirashima M, Guemira F, et al.: Blood diffusion and Th1-suppressive effects of galectin-9-containing exosomes released by Epstein-Barr virus-infected nasopharyngeal carcinoma cells. Blood 2009, 113: 1957-1966. 10.1182/blood-2008-02-142596PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lu Z, Liu M, Stribinskis V, Klinge CM, Ramos KS, Colburn NH, Li Y: MicroRNA-21 promotes cell transformation by targeting the programmed cell death 4 gene. Oncogene 2008, 27: 4373-4379. 10.1038/onc.2008.72PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Mitchell PS, Parkin RK, Kroh EM, Fritz BR, Wyman SK, Pogosova-Agadjanyan EL, Peterson A, Noteboom J, O'Briant KC, Allen A, et al.: Circulating microRNAs as stable blood-based markers for cancer detection. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2008, 105: 10513-10518. 10.1073/pnas.0804549105PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gilligan KJ, Rajadurai P, Lin JC, Busson P, Abdel-Hamid M, Prasad U, Tursz T, Raab-Traub N: Expression of the Epstein-Barr virus BamHI A fragment in nasopharyngeal carcinoma: evidence for a viral protein expressed in vivo. J Virol 1991, 65: 6252-6259.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Busson P, Ganem G, Flores P, Mugneret F, Clausse B, Caillou B, Braham K, Wakasugi H, Lipinski M, Tursz T: Establishment and characterization of three transplantable EBV-containing nasopharyngeal carcinomas. Int J Cancer 1988, 42: 599-606. 10.1002/ijc.2910420422PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Obernosterer G, Martinez J, Alenius M: Locked nucleic acid-based in situ detection of microRNAs in mouse tissue sections. Nat Protoc 2007, 2: 1508-1514. 10.1038/nprot.2007.153PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Choy EY, Siu KL, Kok KH, Lung RW, Tsang CM, To KF, Kwong DL, Tsao SW, Jin DY: An Epstein-Barr virus-encoded microRNA targets PUMA to promote host cell survival. J Exp Med 2008, 205: 2551-2560. 10.1084/jem.20072581PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sbih-Lammali F, Clausse B, Ardila-Osorio H, Guerry R, Talbot M, Havouis S, Ferradini L, Bosq J, Tursz T, Busson P: Control of apoptosis in Epstein Barr virus-positive nasopharyngeal carcinoma cells: opposite effects of CD95 and CD40 stimulation. Cancer Res 1999, 59: 924-930.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cheung ST, Huang DP, Hui AB, Lo KW, Ko CW, Tsang YS, Wong N, Whitney BM, Lee JC: Nasopharyngeal carcinoma cell line (C666-1) consistently harbouring Epstein-Barr virus. Int J Cancer 1999, 83: 121-126. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0215(19990924)83:1<121::AID-IJC21>3.0.CO;2-FPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lamparski HG, Metha-Damani A, Yao JY, Patel S, Hsu DH, Ruegg C, Le Pecq JB: Production and characterization of clinical grade exosomes derived from dendritic cells. J Immunol Methods 2002, 270: 211-226.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Chan AT, Felip E: Nasopharyngeal cancer: ESMO clinical recommendations for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 2009,20(4):123-125. 10.1093/annonc/mdp150PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Dehee A, Asselot C, Piolot T, Jacomet C, Rozenbaum W, Vidaud M, Garbarg-Chenon A, Nicolas JC: Quantification of Epstein-Barr virus load in peripheral blood of human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients using real-time PCR. J Med Virol 2001, 65: 543-552. 10.1002/jmv.2071PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Chen C, Ridzon DA, Broomer AJ, Zhou Z, Lee DH, Nguyen JT, Barbisin M, Xu NL, Mahuvakar VR, Andersen MR, et al.: Real-time quantification of microRNAs by stem-loop RT-PCR. Nucleic Acids Res 2005, 33: e179. 10.1093/nar/gni178PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.