- Open Access
Importance of A-loop complementarity with tRNAHis anticodon for continued selection of tRNAHis as the HIV reverse transcription primer
© Ni et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2007
- Received: 17 November 2006
- Accepted: 10 January 2007
- Published: 10 January 2007
Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV-1) preferentially selects tRNALys,3 as the primer for reverse transcription. HIV-1 can be forced to select alternative tRNAs through mutation in the primer-binding site (PBS) and a region upstream of the PBS designated as the A-loop. Alteration of the PBS and A-loop to be complementary to the 3' terminal nucleotides and anticodon of tRNAHis results in HIV-1 that can stably utilize this tRNA for replication.
In the current study, we have investigated the effect that mutations within the A-loop have on the stability of HIV-1 with a PBS complementary to tRNAHis. For these studies, we have altered the A-loop to be complementary to tRNAMet, tRNAGln, tRNAIle, tRNAThr and tRNASer. All substitutions of the A-loops with the PBS complementary to tRNAHis resulted in a reduction of infectious virus obtained following transfection of proviral genomes in the 293T cells. Virus replication in SupT1 cells was also impaired as a result of the alteration of the A-loop. Viruses with the A-loop complementary to tRNALys,3 and tRNASer reverted to utilize tRNALys,3 following in vitro replication. In contrast, viruses with the A-loop complementary to the other tRNAs remained stable and continued to use tRNAHis. RNA modeling of the stem-loop structure revealed that nucleotides were displayed on the loop region that could potentially interact with the anticodon of tRNAHis. To further explore the effects of the A-loop mutations on virus replication, the A-loops complementary to tRNASer or tRNAHis were cloned into the wild type genome with the PBS complementary to tRNALys,3. Transfection of proviral genomes which contained the wild type PBS and A-loops complementary to tRNASer or tRNAHis into 293 T cells did not impact on the production of viruses as measured by p24 antigen ELISA. However, viruses with the A-loop complementary to tRNAHis had greatly reduced infectivity and replicated poorly in SupT1 compared to the wild type or viruses with the A-loop complementary to tRNASer.
These studies demonstrate that complementarity of A-loop region with the anticodon of tRNAHis has a pronounced effect on the capacity of HIV-1 to utilize tRNAHis as the primer for reverse transcription. Complementarity between A-loop and anticodon of the tRNA then is important for the selection of the tRNA primer used for reverse transcription.
- Infectious Virus
- Wild Type Virus
- Prime Selection
- SupT1 Cell
- Proviral Genome
The hallmark of retrovirus replication is the process by which the RNA genome is converted to a DNA intermediate prior to integration into the host cell chromosome. This process, termed reverse transcription is catalyzed by a virally encoded enzyme reverse transcriptase [1, 2]. A cellular tRNA is captured by retroviruses for use as the primer for the initiation of reverse transcription. The 3' terminal 18-nucleotides of the tRNA is complementary to an 18-nucleotide region in the viral RNA genome designated as the primer-binding site (PBS) [3–5]. The reverse transcriptase uses the tRNA bound to the PBS as the primer to copy the viral genome. During reverse transcription, the reverse transcriptase copies the tRNA primer to regenerate the PBS. Thus, the PBS of integrated proviruses is complementary to the tRNA primer used for initiation [6–8].
Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV-1) preferentially selects tRNALys,3 as the primer for replication [9–12]. Previous studies have shown that alteration of the PBS to be complementary to alternative tRNAs, allows HIV-1 to transiently utilize these tRNAs for replication [13–15]. However, HIV-1 with the PBS complementary to these alternative tRNAs revert following in vitro culture to utilize tRNALys,3. Previous studies from this lab have attempted to force HIV-1 to utilize alternative tRNAs for replication [16–20]. To achieve this, mutations have been made in an upstream region, designated as the A-loop. Previous studies using both chemical and enzymatic analysis have shown that the A-loop interacts with the anticodon region of tRNALys,3 in the initiation complex . Alteration of the A-loop region to be complementary to certain tRNA molecules along with mutations in the PBS allow HIV-1 to utilize certain alternative tRNAs as primer for replication. Using this approach, we have generated viruses which can utilize tRNALys1,2, tRNAHis, tRNAGlu, tRNAMet and more recently tRNAThr [16–19, 22, 23]. HIV-1 with alterations in the A-loop and PBS to be complementary to tRNAIle, tRNASer or tRNAGln though were not stable and rapidly reverted back to utilize tRNALys,3 following in vitro replication [20, 23, 24]. The reason for the preference of HIV-1 for a certain tRNAs that can be selected and utilized as primers for replication is unknown. It is possible that primer selection occurs from an intracellular pool of tRNAs. In support of this idea, previous studies have shown a link between primer selection and viral translation [25, 26].
One of the more thoroughly characterized HIV-1 that utilizes alternative tRNA is a virus that has been engineered to replicate using tRNAHis [16, 17]. Previous studies from our laboratory have shown that alteration of the A-loop and PBS to be complementary to tRNAHis results in a virus that can stably utilize this tRNA for in vitro replication. Analysis of virus that had undergone extensive in vitro replication revealed a RNA stem-loop structure in which the nucleotides complementary to the anticodon of tRNAHis were displayed on the loop region. A previous study has shown that this RNA stem loop structure has the potential to interact with tRNAHis in vitro .
In the current study, we have further explored the specificity of the A-loop in the primer selection process. Since RNA structure of the A-loop is probably important, we have used A-loop regions from viruses that have been engineered to stably utilize alternative tRNAs (tRNAMet and tRNAThr). We have also used A-loop regions that are complementary to the anticodon of tRNAIle, or tRNASer or tRNAGln which are not stably used by HIV-1. The A-loop regions thus display nucleotides complementary to the different tRNAs on the loop of an RNA stem-loop. Analysis of the replication and stability of the PBS revealed that certain A-loops effectively substitute for the A-loop complementary to the anticodon of tRNAHis to allow the virus to stably utilize this tRNA for replication. The presence of nucleotides that can interact with the anti-codon of tRNAHis correlates with the stability of these viruses following in vitro replication. Alteration of the A-loop region complementary to the anticodon of tRNAHis can also impact on the replication of the wild type virus. The results of these studies demonstrate that the complementarity of the A-loop region with the anticodon region of tRNAHis is important for the stable selection and use of this tRNA as the primer for reverse transcription.
Construction of HIV-1 with A-loop mutations and PBS complementarity to tRNAHis
We first analyzed the production of infectious virus following transfection of the proviral genomes into 293T cells. In general, we found that the amount of virus produced as determined p24 antigen from the transfection supernatant was comparable for all of the mutants and similar to that of the wild type virus (NL4-WT). Thus, alteration of the A-loop and PBS did not effect virus production as measured by p24 antigen. However, alteration of the PBS resulted in a reduction in the production of infectious virus, as determined by the JC53-BL assay, to levels that were approximately 20% that of the wild type virus. This result is consistent with previous studies from our laboratory which have shown that alteration of the PBS generally results in a reduction production of infectious virus, but not viral proteins, as compared to the wild type virus.
We next compared the replication of viruses in which the PBS was complementary to tRNAHis with different A-loop combinations. In the first of experiments, we analyzed the replication of NL4-His-SerAC, NL4-His-IleAC and NL4-His-GlnAC. Previous studies have shown that viruses with the U5-PBS complementary to these tRNAs (tRNASer, tRNAIle and tRNAGln) were unstable and reverted to tRNALys,3 during culture [24, 28]. The replication of NL4-His-SerAC was delayed compared to that of the wild type virus, eventually reaching a peak level at Day 35 post initiation of culture. The viruses derived from NL4-His-GlnAC and NL4-His-IleAC also exhibited a delay in replication reaching a peak at a similar time approximately 42 days post initiation of culture (Figure 2B). Analysis of the PBS of these viruses revealed that NL4-His-SerAC had reverted to utilize tRNALys,3. In contrast, viruses derived from NL4-His-GlnAC and NL4-His-IleAC retained the PBS complementary to tRNAHis for the duration of the culture. Finally, we analyzed the replication of viruses in which the A-loop had been mutated to be complementary to tRNAMet or tRNAThr; previous studies have shown that U5-PBS complementary to these tRNAs remain stable following in vitro replication . All of these viruses exhibited a delayed replication compared to the wild type virus. It was only during the end of the culture period (approximately 30–42 days) that these viruses reached peak levels of p24 antigen in the culture (Figure 2C). However, analysis of the PBS of these viruses revealed that all had retained the PBS complementary to tRNAHis, indicating a stable use of this tRNA as the primer for replication.
Effect of A-loop alteration on replication of wild type virus
We next compared the replication of theses viruses in SupT1 cells (Figure 4D). In the case of the wild type virus (NL4-WT), a rapid increase in the production of infectious virus, peaking at approximately Day 14 to 21-post initiation of culture. The virus derived from NL4-SerAC gave a similar replication profile peaking again at Day 14 to 21. In contrast, virus derived from NL4-HisAC was poorly infectious during the culture period examined barely producing enough virus to be detected using the p24 ELISA. In fact, replication of NL4-His-HisAC was approximately 100 fold greater than NL4-HisAC (as determined by p24 antigen in the culture supernatant), indicating the A-loop modification with change in the PBS to be complementary to tRNAHis facilitated selection and use of tRNAHis as the replication primer.
Previous studies from this laboratory have utilized a genetic approach to understand the mechanism of primer selection by HIV-1 [16–20, 22]. Alteration of both the A-loop region and PBS to be complementary to several different tRNAs resulted in HIV-1 having the capacity to stably utilize these tRNAs for replication. Viruses which can utilize tRNAHis, tRNAMet, or tRNAThr have been previously described [16–18, 23]. All of these viruses maintain the PBS complementary to the cognate tRNA, although their replication is diminished compared to the wild type. In contrast, the viruses in which PBS and A-loop were complementary to tRNAIle, tRNASer, or tRNAGln did not utilize these tRNAs following in vitro culture, and rapidly reverted to utilize tRNALys,3 [20, 23, 24]. It was not clear though, from our previous studies if the nucleotide sequence within the A-loop region and the RNA structure of this A-loop region were important for the virus to maintain a PBS to an alternative tRNA. The results of our current study highlight the importance of the nucleotide sequence displayed on the A-loop region for the unique selection of tRNAHis as the primer for replication. Only those viruses in which the A-loop region contained nucleotides that could interact with the anticodon region of tRNAHis stably maintained the PBS complementary to tRNAHis following replication. Indeed, even viruses NL4-His-IleAC and NL4-His-GlnAC stably maintained a PBS complementary to tRNAHis following in vitro replication. Viruses in which the PBS and A-loop region were complementary to tRNAIle or tRNAGln though rapidly reverted to utilize tRNALys,3 following in vitro replication [20, 23, 24]. One explanation for this discrepancy is that the availability of tRNAHis, tRNAIle and tRNAGln could differ for selection as primers for HIV-1 reverse transcription. We would expect that if tRNAIle or tRNAGln were available for primer selection, it would compete with tRNAHis for interaction with the A-loop region which could potentially compromise the stability of the PBS following in vitro replication. The stability of the A-loop regions complementary to tRNAMet and tRNAThr that allow the virus to stably utilize tRNAHis might mean that tRNAHis has a greater intracellular availability for primer selection. This explanation will also account for the results obtained with the virus NL4-His-SerAC, which contained nucleotides displayed on the loop region that are complementary to the anticodon of tRNASer. This virus rapidly reverted to utilize tRNALys,3 following in vitro replication. Without tRNASer available to interact with the A-loop, and because the nucleotides in the A-loop of NL4-His-SerAC are not complementary to the anticodon of tRNAHis, tRNALys,3 would be favored for capture, leading to the conversion of the PBS to be complementary to tRNALys,3.
The results of our studies support the idea that A-loop region plays an important role in the selection of tRNAHis as an alternative primer for HIV-1 replication [16, 17]. Previous studies have utilized in vitro systems to demonstrate that the A-loop region does interact with the anticodon of tRNAHis . The results of our current studies again support that this interaction is important for the continued selection of tRNAHis as the primer for reverse transcription. A surprising result from our studies was the impact of the A-loop region complementary to tRNAHis on the replication of the wild type virus with the PBS complementary to tRNALys,3 (NL4-WT-HisAC). In fact, NL4-WT-HisAC replicated poorly compared to the wild type virus or NL4-WT-Ser which contained the A-loop region complementary to tRNASer. This inhibition of replication was not due to production of virus as demonstrated following transfection of proviral genomes in the 293T cells where we recovered similar amounts of p24 antigen in the culture supernatants. Rather, the major effect was on the production of infectious virus as determined both by the JC53-BL assay and from analysis of virus replication studies in SupT1 cells. How the A-loop complementary to the anti-codon would inhibit replication of the virus with a PBS complementary to tRNALys,3 is unclear. One possibility could be that because of the availability of tRNAHis, the A-loop attracts tRNAHis to the U5-PBS. The presence of both tRNAHis and tRNALys,3 with the U5-PBS could interfere with primer selection, accounting for the lower production of infectious virus.
In the current study, we have further investigated the mechanism of HIV-1 primer selection using a unique virus which has been engineered to use tRNAHis as the primer for replication. For HIV-1 to select tRNAHis as the primer, previous studies have found that additional mutations were required in the A-loop region upstream of the PBS to be complementary to the anticodon of tRNAHis [16, 17]. Viruses in which the A-loop region contains nucleotides complementary to the anticodon of tRNAHis stably maintained the PBS complementary to tRNAHis following in vitro replication. In contrast, viruses which the A-loop contained nucleotides that could not interact with the anticodon of tRNAHis (NL4-His-SerAC or NL4-His) reverted to utilize tRNALys,3 following a short-term in vitro culture. Substitution of the A-loop in the wild type genome to be complementary to the anticodon of tRNAHis rather than tRNALys,3 had a profound impact on virus replication.
Our results are consistent with the idea that there is an interaction between the tRNA and A-loop region and PBS could facilitate the selection of the primer. If the A-loop region is complementary to alternative tRNAs that are available (e.g. tRNAHis), this interaction could interfere with the efficient selection of tRNALys,3. A previous study described several alternative RNA structures in the 5' NTR that could function as a riboswitch for dimerization and encapsidation . When considered in the context of the results presented in this study, it is possible that the RNA structures could be involved in the selection of the tRNA primer through interaction with the A-loop and PBS. Many riboswitch elements have been identified in the 5' NTR of bacterial RNAs including T-box RNAs which interact with tRNAs [30–33]. It is possible that the process of primer selection/capture could involve a riboswitch like mechanism in which the A-loop-PBS co-ordinates the capture of available tRNAs, such as tRNAHis, tRNAMet, tRNAThr and of course tRNALys,3. Additional experiments will be needed to delineate the important features of the interaction between the U5-PBS and tRNA that are involved in primer selection.
Construction of mutant proviral genomes
All mutations were made in pUC119PBS or derivatives using the Quick change II site-directed mutagenesis kit (Stratagene, LaJolla, CA). The pUCHis-SerAC, pUCHis-ThrAC, pUCHis-IleAC, pUCHis-MetAC, pUCHis-GlnAC are the mutants with PBS complementary to tRNAHis while A-loop complementary to the anticodon of tRNASer, tRNAThr, tRNAIle, tRNAMet and tRNAGln respectively. For all these pUCHis mutants, the modifications in A-Loop were made with pUC119HisAC as the template. In pUC119HisAC, both PBS and A-Loop are pared with tRNAHis. The primers for pUC119His-SerAC were 5'-GACCCTTTTAGTCAGTGTGCTTCTAACGCTAGCAAT GGTGC-3' (sense) and 5'-GCACCATTGCTAGCGTTAGAAGCACACTGACTAAAA GGGTC-3' (anti-sense); the primers for pUC119His-ThrAC were 5'-GACCCTTTTAGT CAGTGTGCTACAAACGCTAGCAATGGTGC-3' (sense) and 5'-GCACCATTGCTA GCGTTTGTAGCACACTGACTAAAAGGGTC-3' (anti-sense); the primers for pUC119His-IleAC were 5'-GACCCTTTTAGTCAGTGTGCATAAACGCTAGCAATG GTGCC-3' (sense) and 5'-GGCACCATTGCTAGCGTTTATGCACACTGACTAAAA GGGTC-3' (anti-sense); the primers for pUC119His-MetAC were 5'-GACCCTTTTAG TCAGTGTGCATGAACGCTAGCAATGGTGCC-3' (sense) and 5'-GGCACCATTGC TAGCGTTCATGCACACTGACTAAAAGGGTC-3' (anti-sense) and the primers for pUC119His-GlnAC were 5'-GACCCTTTTAGTCAGTGTGCCAAAACGCTAGCAAT GGTGC-3' (sense) and 5'-GCACCATTGCTAGCGTTTTGGCACACTGACTAAAAG GGTC-3' (anti-sense). To construct the mutants with wild type PBS and altered A-loop regions, the starting plasmid was pUC119PBS. To construct HIV-1 with the A-loop to be complementary to tRNAHis with PBS complementary to tRNALys,3, the three additional nucleotides 628, 635, 654 were changed to the G, A and C, because these three mutations have been shown to facilitate the usage of tRNAHis together with A-loop mutations [17, 27]. The site-directed mutagenesis was carried out on the plasmid pUC-119 vector that has wild type PBS. The synthetic oligonucleotides primers to construct pUC-WT-HisAC were 5'-GTCAGTGTGGAAAATCGCTAGCAATGGCGCCCGAACAGGGACCTGA AAGCGAAAGGGAAAC-3' (sense) and 5'-GTTTCCCTTTCGCTTTCAGGTCCCTGT TCGGGCGCCATTGCTAGCGATTTTCCACACTGAC-3' (antisense). Following the mutagenesis, the clones were confirmed by DNA sequencing. All the pUC119 mutants were digested with HpaI and BssHII and inserted into SmaI and BssHII sites of NL4-3 HIV-1 proviral plasmid. The resulting NL4-3 mutants were verified by the automated DNA sequencing.
The 293T cells were maintained in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM) (Cellgro, Hemdon, VA) plus 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) (Hyclone, Logan UT) and 1% antibiotic-antimycotic (Bibco BRL, Rockville, MD). SupT1 cells were maintained in RPMI 1640 (Cellgro, Hemdon, VA), supplemented with 15% FBS and 1% antibiotic-antimycotic.
Transfections were performed according to the protocol of Fugene 6 transfection Reagent (Roche Molecular Biochemicals, Indianapolis, IN). 3 ul Fugene reagent was added to 100 ul of DMEM without FBS, the 2 ug of proviral plasmid DNA was added 5 minutes later. The mixture was incubated at room temperature for 45 minutes then added to one well of a 6-well plate with 40% confluent 293T cells in DMEM with 10% FBS. The transfections were incubated at 37°C for 72 hours, then the supernatants were collected and centrifuged with 24,000 × g for 1 minute. The supernatants were aliquoted and stored at -80°C. The p24 antigen of the supernatants was analyzed by ELISA (Beckman Coulter, Miami, FL) and infectivity was determined by JC53-BL assay as described previously.
Infection of SupT1 and virus replication
The viral supernatants with 1000IU infectivity were used to infect 1 × 106 SupT1 cells. The mixture of virus and SupT1 cells were incubated at 37°C for 4 hours, shaking every 30 minutes. The mixtures were then transferred to 25 cm2 tissue culture flasks and the final volumes were adjusted to 10 mL by RPMI 1640 plus 15% FBS and 1% antibiotic-antimycotic.
The infected SupT1 cells were passaged at 1:4 every 3 days. When the cells were cleared because of syncytia, the fresh 1 × 106 SupT1 cells were added to all cultures. Every 7 days, 1 mL of cell culture was collected and centrifuged at 24,000 × g for 1 minute. The supernatant and cell pellets were store at -80°C for further analysis.
DNA sequencing of viral U5-PBS region
High-molecular-Weight DNA (HWM) was extracted from infected SupT1 cell pellets by Wizard genomic DNA purification kit (Promega, Madison, WI) following the protocol. The fragment containing U5-PBS region was amplified from HMW by PCR with primers EcoRI (5'-CGGAATTCTCTCTCCTTCTAGCCTCCGCTAGTC-3') and SphI (5'-CCTTGAGCATGCGATCTACCACACACAAGGC-3'). The resulting PCR products were run on 1% agarose gel and the amplified fragments were cut and purified with the Qiagen Gel Purification kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA). The sequence of purified DNA was determined by automated DNA sequencing with EcoRI as primer.
We thank members of the Morrow Laboratory for helpful discussions. DNA sequencing was carried out by the UAB CFAR DNA Sequencing Core (AI 27767). CDM acknowledges help from MAR. This work was supported by a grant from the NIH to CDM (AI34749).
- Baltimore D: RNA-dependent DNA polymerase in virions of RNA tumour viruses. Nature 1970, 226: 1209-1211. 10.1038/2261209a0PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Temin HM, Mizutani S: RNA-dependent DNA polymerase in virions of Rous sarcoma virus. Nature 1970, 226: 1211-1213. 10.1038/2261211a0PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Panet A, Berliner H: Binding of tRNA to reverse transcriptase of RNA tumor viruses. J Virol 1978, 26: 214-220.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Peters G, Dahlberg JE: RNA-directed DNA synthesis in Moloney murine leukemia virus: Interaction between the primer tRNA and the genome RNA. J Virol 1979, 31: 398-407.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Temin HM: Structure, variation and synthesis of retrovirus long terminal repeat. Cell 1981, 27: 1-3. 10.1016/0092-8674(81)90353-6PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gilboa E, Mitra SW, Goff S, Baltimore D: A detailed model of reverse transcription and tests of crucial aspects. Cell 1979, 18: 93-100. 10.1016/0092-8674(79)90357-XPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Taylor JM: An analysis of the role of tRNA species as primers for transcription into DNA of RNA tumor virus genomes. Biochem Biophys Acta 1977, 473: 57-71.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Varmus HE: Form and function of retroviral proviruses. Science 1982, 216: 812-820. 10.1126/science.6177038PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Muesing MA, Smith DH, Cabradilla CD, Benton CV, Lasky LA, Capon DJ: Nucleic acid structure and expression of the human AIDS/lymphadenopathy retrovirus. Nature 1985, 313: 450-458. 10.1038/313450a0PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ratner L, Haseltine W, Patarca R, Livak KJ, Starcich B, Josephs SF, Doran ER, Rafalski JA, Whitehorn EA, Baumeister K, Ivanoff L, Petteway Jr. SR, Pearson ML, Lautenberger JA, Papas TS, Ghrayeb J, Chang NT, Gallo RC, Wong-Staal F: Complete nucleotide sequence of the AIDS virus, HTLV-III. Nature 1985, 313: 277-284. 10.1038/313277a0PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Mak J, Kleiman L: Primer tRNAs for reverse transcription. J Virol 1997, 71: 8087-8095.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Marquet R, Isel C, Ehresmann C, Ehresmann B: tRNAs as primer of reverse transcriptases. Biochimie 1995, 77: 113-124. 10.1016/0300-9084(96)88114-4PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wakefield JK, Wolf AG, Morrow CD: Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 can use different tRNAs as primers for reverse transcription but selectively maintains a primer binding site complementary to tRNALys,3. J Virol 1995, 69: 6021-6029.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Li X, Mak J, Arts EJ, Gu Z, Kleiman L, Wainberg MA, Parniak MA: Effects of alterations of primer-binding site sequences on human immunodeficiency virus type 1 replication. J Virol 1994, 68: 6198-6206.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Das AT, Klaver B, Berkhout B: Reduced replication of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 mutants that use reverse transcription primers other than the natural tRNALys,3. J Virol 1995, 69: 3090-3097.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Wakefield JK, Kang SM, Morrow CD: Construction of a type 1 human immunodeficiency virus that maintains a primer binding site complementary to tRNAHis. J Virol 1996, 70: 966-975.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Zhang Z, Kang SM, Li Y, Morrow CD: Genetic analysis of the U5-PBS of a novel HIV-1 reveals multiple interactions between the tRNA and RNA genome required for initiation of reverse transcription. RNA 1998, 4: 394-406. 10.1017/S1355838298971849PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kang SM, Zhang Z, Morrow CD: Identification of a human immunodeficiency virus type 1 that stably uses tRNALys1,2 rather than tRNALys,3 for initiation of reverse transcription. Virology 1999, 257: 95-105. 10.1006/viro.1999.9615PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kang SM, Morrow CD: Genetic analysis of a unique human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) with a primer binding site complementary to tRNAMet supports a role for U5-PBS stem-loop RNA structures in initiation of HIV-1 reverse transcription. J Virol 1999, 73: 1818-1827.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Kang SM, Zhang Z, Morrow CD: Identification of a sequence within U5 required for human immunodeficiency virus type 1 to stably maintain a primer binding site complementary to tRNAMet. J Virol 1997, 71: 207-217.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Isel C, Ehresmann C, Keith G, Ehresmann B, Marquet R: Initiation of reverse transcription of HIV-1: Secondary structure of the HIV-1 RNA/tRNA(3Lys) (template/primer). J Mol Biol 1995, 247: 236-250. 10.1006/jmbi.1994.0136PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Dupuy LC, Kelly NJ, Elgavish TE, Harvey SC, Morrow CD: Probing the importance of tRNA anticodon: human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) RNA genome complementarity with an HIV-1 that selects tRNAGlu for replication. J Virol 2003, 77: 8756-8764. 10.1128/JVI.77.16.8756-8764.2003PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ni N, Morrow CD: Impact of forced selection of tRNAs on HIV-1 replication and genome stability highlight preferences for selection of certain tRNAs. Virus Res 2006., In press:Google Scholar
- Li M, Eipers PG, Ni N, Morrow CD: HIV-1 designed to use different tRNAGln isoacceptors prefers to select tRNAThr for replication. Virol J 2006., Accepted:Google Scholar
- Kelly NJ, Palmer MT, Morrow CD: Selection of retroviral reverse transcription primer is coordinated with tRNA biogenesis. J Virol 2003, 77: 8695-8701. 10.1128/JVI.77.16.8695-8701.2003PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kelly NJ, Morrow CD: Yeast tRNAPhe expressed in human cells can be selected by HIV-1 for use as a reverse transcription primer. Virology 2003, 313: 354-363. 10.1016/S0042-6822(03)00243-5PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Rigourd M, Goldschmidt V, Brule F, Morrow CD, Ehresmann B, Ehresmann C, Marquet R: Structure-function relationships of the initiation complex of HIV-1 reverse transcription: the case of mutant viruses using tRNA as primer. Nuc Acid Res 2003, 31: 5764-5775. 10.1093/nar/gkg754View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Harboe M, Wiker HG: The 38-kDa protein of Mycobacterium tuberculosis: A review. J Infect Dis 1992, 166: 874-884.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ooms M, Huthoff H, Russell R, Liang C, Berkhout B: A riboswitch regulates RNA dimerization and packaging in human immunodeficiency virus type 1 virions. J Virol 2004, 78: 10814-10819. 10.1128/JVI.78.19.10814-10819.2004PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sudarsan N, Hammond MC, Block KF, Welz R, Barrick JE, Roth A, Breaker RR: Tandem riboswitch architectures exhibit complex gene control functions. Science 2006, 314: 300-304. 10.1126/science.1130716PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Mandal M, Breaker RR: Gene regulation by riboswitches. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2004, 5: 451-463. 10.1038/nrm1403PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Soukup JK, Soukup GA: Riboswitches exert genetic control through metabolite-induced conformational change. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2004, 14: 344-349. 10.1016/j.sbi.2004.04.007PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Winkler WC, Breaker RR: Regulation of bacterial gene expression by riboswitches. Annu Rev Microbiol 2005, 59: 487-517. 10.1146/annurev.micro.59.030804.121336PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.