Open Access

Transmission of H7N9 influenza virus in mice by different infective routes

  • Linlin Bao1,
  • Lili Xu1,
  • Hua Zhu1,
  • Wei Deng1,
  • Ting Chen1,
  • Qi Lv1,
  • Fengdi Li1,
  • Jing Yuan1,
  • Yanfeng Xu1,
  • Lan Huang1,
  • Yanhong Li1,
  • Jiangning Liu1,
  • Yanfeng Yao1,
  • Pin Yu1,
  • Honglin Chen2 and
  • Chuan Qin1Email author
Contributed equally
Virology Journal201411:185

https://doi.org/10.1186/1743-422X-11-185

Received: 5 December 2013

Accepted: 3 October 2014

Published: 3 November 2014

Abstract

Background

On 19 February 2013, the first patient infected with a novel influenza A H7N9 virus from an avian source showed symptoms of sickness. More than 349 laboratory-confirmed cases and 109 deaths have been reported in mainland China since then. Laboratory-confirmed, human-to-human H7N9 virus transmission has not been documented between individuals having close contact; however, this transmission route could not be excluded for three families. To control the spread of the avian influenza H7N9 virus, we must better understand its pathogenesis, transmissibility, and transmission routes in mammals. Studies have shown that this particular virus is transmitted by aerosols among ferrets.

Methods

To study potential transmission routes in animals with direct or close contact to other animals, we investigated these factors in a murine model.

Results

Viable H7N9 avian influenza virus was detected in the upper and lower respiratory tracts, intestine, and brain of model mice. The virus was transmissible between mice in close contact, with a higher concentration of virus found in pharyngeal and ocular secretions, and feces. All these biological materials were contagious for naïve mice.

Conclusions

Our results suggest that the possible transmission routes for the H7N9 influenza virus were through mucosal secretions and feces.

Keywords

H7N9 influenza virus Direct contact Route of transmission Ocular secretions Feces Pharyngeal secretions

Background

On 19 February 2013, the first patient infected with the novel influenza A H7N9 virus from an avian source showed signs of sickness. More than 347 laboratory-confirmed cases have been reported in mainland China, with 109 cases resulting in death. Most cases of H7N9 infection have occurred in elderly men who had recently been exposed to live poultry. Patients with laboratory-confirmed H7N9 infections had an exposure history that included direct contact with respiratory secretions or fecal material. Exposure to live poultry is a case-fatality risk associated with influenza A H7N9 virus infection [16]. Live bird markets are suspected of being the source of human infections; shutting down live poultry markets resulted in an immediate reduction in cases [7]. There is a precedent for the human transmission of H7 influenza, with limited person-to-person transmission observed in an H7N7 outbreak in the Netherlands in 2003 [8]. Three suspected family clusters of cases were reported [9], indicating the possibility of limited human-to-human transmission of the H7N9 virus [10].

Previous studies have reported aerosol transmission of the H7N9 virus among ferrets [11]. Other researchers have used a mouse model to study contact-dependent transmission of influenza A virus [12]. We evaluated the transmission of the H7N9 virus in mice to provide insights into potential human transmissibility.

Results

Pathogenicity of influenza virus strains in mice

Mice were infected with influenza A/Anhui/1/2013 virus (106.25–108.25 TCID50) to determine the LD50 and survival of H7N9 in mice (Figure 1a). The LD50 values of the three viruses we investigated were 107.5, 101, and 104.8 TCID50 for H7N9, H5N1, and H1N1, respectively. At a dose of 106 TCID50, mice infected with H5N1 or H1N1 virus died during the observation period (Figure 1b). After inoculation with the H7N9 virus at 106 TCID50, weight loss was observed at 2 days post inoculation (dpi; Figure 1c); the average weight loss at 7 dpi was greater than 30%. Mice infected with the H7N9 virus at 106 TCID50 exhibited weight loss from 2 dpi but recovered around 8 dpi.
Figure 1

Avian influenza virus H7N9 (A/Anhui/1/2013) infects mice. (a) LD50 of A/Anhui/1/2013 (H7N9). Representative results of three doses (108.25–106.25 TCID50) are shown. (b) Survival comparison of mice infected with H5N1, H1N1, or H7N9 viruses. (c) Percentage initial weight loss in mice infected with 106 TCID50 of H7N9 (A/Anhui/1/2013). Data are presented as the average values from two independent experiments ± SD (n =10 per group).

Virus titers in the tissues of infected mice administered 106 TCID50 of virus were determined using MDCK cells. Viable virus was detected in the lungs of mice infected with any of the influenza viruses from 1–7 dpi (Additional file 1: Table S2). Virus was transiently isolated from the liver, kidneys, and intestines of H5N1- or H7N9-infected mice, but not H1N1-infected mice (Table 1). The virulence of the H7N9 virus was less than that of the H5N1 virus. Viable virus was detected in the brains of 33% (2/6) of H7N9-infected mice at 2 dpi. The distribution of viruses in tissues was assessed using immunohistochemistry incorporating a mouse monoclonal antibody against the influenza HA nucleoprotein (1:200 dilution). Following H7N9 infection viable antigens were primarily located within epithelial cells of the bronchi and alveoli in the lungs, epithelial cells of the intestine, renal tubules in the kidney, and gliocytes in the brain (Figure 2a). H5N1 antigens were also detected in the brain parenchyma (Figure 2a). Viral antigens were mainly detected in the lungs of H1N1-infected mice (Figure 2a). Confluent interstitial pneumonia, necrosis of epithelial cells of the bronchi and alveoli, inflammatory cell infiltration, congestion, and fibrin exudation were observed at 3 and 5 dpi in lung tissues (Figure 2b).
Table 1

Virus titers in the tissues of infected mice

Virusa

Days post-infection

Virus titer (log10TCID50 ± SD)

  

Heart

Liver

Spleen

Lung

Kidney

Intestine

Brain

Nose

A/CA/07/09 (H1N1)

5

NPd

-b

+

4.83 ± 1.7

-

-

-

NP

A/SZ/406H/06 (H5N1)

5

NP

3.62 ± 1.1

1.62 ± 0.23

3.50 ± 1.92

1.17 ± 0.32

1.38 ± 0.27

2.17 ± 0.41

NP

A/Anhui/1/2013 (H7N9)

1

-

-

-

4.00 ± 1.20

-

-

-

3.50 ± 1.38

2

-

0.81

1.50

5.50 ± 1.90

2.00

-

+c

2.50 ± 0.75

3

-

0.75

-

5.00 ± 1.85

-

 

-

2.50 ± 0.75

5

-

-

-

6.00 ± 2.15

-

0.86 ± 0.13

-

3.50 ± 1.38

 

7

-

-

-

3.50 ± 1.77

-

0.75

-

2.00 ± 0.38

aMice were infected with influenza viruses at a dose of 106 TCID50.

bViable virus was not detected after three passages in MDCK cells.

cCyotpathic effects were observed but TCID50 values were less than 0.5.

dNP, Not performed.

Figure 2

Histopathology and immunohistochemistry (IHC) analysis of infected mice. (a) Distribution of H7N9, H5N1, and H1N1 viruses in the tissues of infected mice as determined by IHC. Representative viral antigen distribution in tissues at 3 dpi is shown. Viral antigens are denoted with solid arrows (400× magnification). (b) Hematoxylin and eosin stain (HE) staining of lung tissues from infected mice (100× magnification).

H7N9 influenza virus transmission in mice

We sought to determine whether mice infected with the H7N9 influenza virus could transmit virus to naïve mice in close contact. At 24 h post-inoculation (hpi), seven H7N9-naïve mice were introduced into the same cage as three intranasally infected mice (107 TCID50). We detected virus in the lungs and intestines of the initially uninfected mice that were placed in contact with mice exposed to H7N9 or H1N1 virus. We were unable to detect H5N1 in either tissue (Table 2).
Table 2

Transmissibility of H7N9 influenza virus in mice put in contact with infected mice

Virus

Virus titer (mean log10TCID50 ± SD)

 

Lung

Kidney

Intestine

Brain

Nose

Infected contact miceb

Weight loss (%)c

Seroconvertedd

Days post-infection

5

7

5 and 7

5

7

5

5

   

A/SZ/406H/06 A/CA/07/09

-

 

NPa

-f

-

-

NP

0

0

0

2.07 ± 0.16

1.47 ± 0.19

NP

-

-

-

+

8/14

11

4/7

A/Anhui/1/2013

1.26 ± 0.41

0.67 ± 0.01

-

1.34 ± 0.25

0.97 ± 0.01

+e

+

7/14

6

3/7

aNP, Not performed.

bNumber of contact mice containing virus in the lung, brain, and nose at 5 and 7 days after co-housing.

cMaximum proportional weight loss.

dHI titers >40.

eCyotpathic effects were observed but TCID50 values were less than 0.5.

fViable virus was not detected after three passages in MDCK cells.

All mice (6/7) exposed to the H7N9 virus exhibited weight loss; the maximal loss observed in one mouse was 6% (Table 2). Around 43% (3/7) of mice exposed to the virus became infected (Table 2). Viable virus was detected in the brain of one mouse and in the nose of another mouse (Table 2). Approximately 6/7 mice exposed to H1N1 exhibited weight loss; the highest level of weight loss approached 11% (Table 2). Of the mice exposed to H1N1, 57% (4/7) became infected (Table 2). In the tissues of the naïve mice that were co-housed with H7N9-infected mice, viral antigens were primarily located in the lung and intestine, similar to their localization in infected mice (Figure 3a). However, virus titers in contact mice were lower than those in the infected mice. Mild lesions were observed in the tissues of naïve mice that were placed in contact with infected mice after 3 days. A dilated area of interstitial pneumonia and congestion were observed in lungs 7 days after contact with infected mice (Figure 3b). We detected antibodies against H7 viruses in seven naïve mice 14 days after contact with infected mice; we also detected H7N9 virus in 3/7 naïve mice (Table 2).
Figure 3

H7N9 virus is transmissible among mice by direct contact. Seven naïve mice were placed in direct contact with three mice infected with 106 TCID50 of H7N9 virus. (a) IHC observations in tissues of mice exposed to H7N9-infected mice. Viral antigen distribution in tissues at 5 days following exposure to infected mice. Viral antigens are denoted with solid arrows (400× magnification). Viral antigens are within the epithelial cells of the bronchi and small intestinal villi, and within infiltrating inflammatory cells of the small intestine. (b) HE staining of lung tissue from mice that came in contact with H7N9-infected mice (100× magnification). At 3 days after coming into contact with infected mice, mild dilation of the interstitial pulmonary vasculature was observed in the lungs; congestion was observed after 7 days.

Secretions from mice infected with H7N9 influenza virus

To evaluate the infectious secretions of H7N9-infected mice, we collected eye and pharyngeal secretions from inoculated mice at 1, 2, and 3 dpi and inoculated them intranasally into mice. Virus was detected in the lungs and intestinal tissues of mice inoculated with the ES-2 inoculum derived from eye secretions, but not with the ES-1 or ES-3 inocula. Virus was detected in the lungs and intestinal tissues of mice administered the TS-1 (throat swab), −2, or −3 inocula. Virus was detected in the lungs and intestines of mice inoculated with feces from H7N9-infected mice (Table 3).
Table 3

Viable virus in naïve mice inoculated with eye, nasal, or fecal samples

Virus sample type

Virus titer (mean log10TCID50 ± SD)

 
 

Lung

Intestine

Nose

ES-1

-

-

-

ES-2

1.17 ± 0.30

0.94 ± 0.62

-

ES-3

-

-

-

TS-1

1.20 ± 0.30

0.94 ± 0.62

-

TS-2

1.02 ± 0.65

0.86

-

TS-3

0.86

0.86

-

F

0.86

0.86

-

Transmission route of H7N9 in mice

We tested different transmission routes in contact mice. When using ES inocula, viable virus was detected in the intestines at 2 days, and in both the lungs and intestines at 4 days. Virus antigens were detected in the lungs, stomach, and intestines. TS inoculum was injected into the tail veins of the mice, and viable virus was detected in the same tissues as for the ocular route of administration. Following virus transmission by the fecal-oral route, virus was detected in the nasal passages, trachea, intestines, and lungs; viral antigens were detected in the lungs, stomach, and intestines (Table 4). At 5 dpi, viral antigens were detected in mice infected via the oral route, primarily within the epithelial cells of the lungs, gastric mucosa, and intestinal mucosa, and in infiltrating inflammatory cells of the small intestine (Figure 4). At the same time point, we also observed limited interstitial pneumonia and inflammatory cell infiltration, degeneration and necrosis of mucosal and gastric epithelial cells, vacuolar degeneration of the epithelial cells of the villi, and degeneration of the small intestine.
Table 4

Detection of viable virus following inoculation of naïve mice via different routes

Route of administration

Days

Virus titer in tissue (TCID50 ± SD)

Viral antigen distribution in tissues

  

Nose

Trachea

Intestine

Lung

Lung

Stomach

Intestine

Oral

3

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

 

5

2.13

2.71

1.80

3.57 ± 1.13

2/3

2/3

2/3

Intravenous

3

-

-

1.80

2.89 ± 0.78

2/3

2/3

2/3

 

5

-

-

1.80

-

-

1/3

1/3

Eye

3

-

-

2.05

-

-

1/3

1/3

 

5

-

-

1.80

1.80

1/3

1/3

1/3

Figure 4

Transmission of influenza H7N9 virus among mice. Naïve mice were inoculated with throat secretions collected from infected mice. At 5 dpi, viral antigens were found in epithelial cells of the lungs, gastric and intestinal mucosa, and in infiltrating inflammatory cells of the small intestine (solid arrows; 400× magnification). At 5 dpi, limited interstitial pneumonia and inflammatory cell infiltration, degeneration and necrosis of epithelial cells in the gastric mucosa, and vacuolar degeneration of epithelial cells in small intestine villi was seen (100× magnification).

Discussion

A second wave of H7N9 viral infections in humans occurred in 2014 across China, with over 50 deaths recorded in 1 month. The Chinese government enforced a temporary closure of live poultry markets in affected provinces, resulting in an immediate reduction in the number of human cases. This provided further evidence of the role live poultry markets play in the spread of the virus, and clearly showed that closure of the markets was an effective control strategy [7]. However, the transmission routes of the H7N9 virus remained unknown, therefore it was still considered a serious threat to human health worldwide [13].

The mouse is a typical model used to evaluate the virulence of influenza viruses, and in its quantitation. It has been reported that a murine model can be used to study contact-dependent transmission of the influenza A virus [12]. In the current study, H7N9 virus-infected mice displayed symptoms of lethality, with pathological changes seen in mice that came in contact with infected mice. We conducted a study on the aerosol transmission of H7N9 in ferrets [11], and used a murine model to study other potential routes of transmission.

Our results indicated that the novel H7N9 virus could efficiently replicate in mice without prior host adaptation. We inoculated BALB/c mice intranasally with A/Anhui/1/2013 to determine H7N9 virus replication, morbidity (as measured by weight loss), and the LD50 in mice. The LD50 titers for the H7N9 virus were lower than those for H5N1 and H1N1 viruses. Mice inoculated with H7N9 virus showed severe morbidity (30% weight loss), a value comparable to that seen for HPAI H5N1 and H1N1 virus infections, which have a high pathogenicity phenotype in this model. Our findings were similar to those reported in previous studies [14]. The H7N9 virus was detected in extra-respiratory intestines, liver, spleen, kidneys, and brains of infected mice, with viral antigen detected in the same tissues. Weight loss was used as a measurable outcome and a marker of virulence following virus infection in these mice [1520]. In our study, the duration of H7N9 virus infection in mice was about 12 days, a similar duration to that seen with human H7N9 infections (4–11 days) [15, 2123]. Virus was detected at higher titers in the lungs than in nasal samples (Table 1). From our transmission experiments we found that virus titers in the lungs of co-housed mice at 5 dpi were higher than those at 7 dpi, with the proportion of infected mice higher than at 7 dpi (Table 2). Results with the H7N9-infected mice were similar to those for H1N1-infected mice. It was previously reported that an avian H7N9 virus effectively replicated in mice with minimal symptoms and that the virus could be transmitted in mice without any pathogenic effects observed [24]. Our results indicate that the H7N9 virus could be transmitted in mice, however weight loss and ruffled coats were observed. The virus was detected at different time points and in several tissues, although virus titer was low.

The transmission of H7N9 influenza virus in ferrets has been shown to occur via aerosols and respiratory droplets [11, 14]. Our results show that the H7N9 influenza virus can also be transmitted between mice via eye secretions (Table 4). Virus in the lung tissues was detected at 4 dpi following ocular administration of ES inocula in mice.

Eye and pharynx secretions, and feces from infected mice proved to be infectious via mucosal, intravenous, and oral routes. Virus was present in lung and intestinal samples (Table 3); at 3 and 7 dpi, mild dilatation of the interstitial pulmonary vasculature was observed in the lungs (Figure 3b). Pathological changes in the lungs were milder in naïve mice than in the infected mice; this difference positively correlated with the amount of virus detected in naïve mice.

Our results indicate that influenza virus can be detected in secretions from the eyes, throat and feces. Virus titer was higher in throat secretions than from eye secretions or fecal samples. Secretions from H7N9-infected mice are able to transmit virus by the ocular, oral, and blood-borne routes. An understanding of viral pathogenesis and of the several transmission routes of the virus would allow for various interventions in animals to prevent a future human pandemic [25].

Conclusion

Viable virus was found in secretions from the eyes and oral cavities of mice infected with the H7N9 influenza virus. The H7N9 virus was transmitted to contact mice by several routes, including the mucosal and fecal-oral routes. We have provided some leads for interpreting transmission of the novel H7N9 influenza virus in humans.

Materials and methods

Viruses

Influenza virus A/Anhui/1/2013 was isolated from a patient with a laboratory-confirmed human A (H7N9) virus infection. The patient was a 35-year-old woman who lived in the Anhui Province of China. On day 6 after the onset of illness, she developed acute respiratory distress syndrome, septic shock, and acute renal damage; the patient died 13 days later [1]. A throat swab (TS) was collected from the patient and propagated in the allantoic sac and amniotic cavity of 9–11-day-old embryonic chicken eggs. The propagated virus was then passaged once in Madin-Darby canine kidney (MDCK) cells. A Q226L (H3 numbering) substitution at the 210-loop of the HA gene was found in this virus. This site has been shown to change receptor binding from avians to humans, possibly increasing the ability of the virus to be transmitted by airborne routes [26]. In addition, the virus encoded PB2 627 K, which is essential for efficient replication of avian influenza viruses in mammals. The highly pathogenic avian influenza A (H5N1) virus A/Shenzhen/406H/06 and 2009 pandemic A (H1N1) virus A/California/07/2009 were also isolated from two patients and propagated in embryonic chicken eggs and MDCK cells. The A (A/Shenzhen/406H/06; H5N1) and 2009 pandemic A (A/California/07/2009; H1N1) viruses were obtained from the University of Hong Kong. MDCK cells were maintained in Eagle’s minimal essential medium (EMEM, Invitrogen) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS), 100 IU/ml penicillin, and 100 μg/ml streptomycin, and were incubated at 37°C/5% CO2.

H7N9 influenza virus in mice

Murine studies were performed in an animal biosafety level 3 (ABSL3) facility using HEPA-filtered isolators. All procedures in this study involving animals were reviewed and approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the Institute of Laboratory Animal Science, Peking Union Medical College (ILAS-PC-2013-006).

The 50% mouse lethal dose (LD50) of the virus was determined by intranasally inoculating five groups of mice (n =10 mice per group) with 10-fold serial dilutions of the virus in a volume of 50 μl. The LD50 was calculated by the method of Reed and Muench [27]. The H5N1 A/Shenzhen/406H/06 and H1N1 A/CA/07/09 strains were used as controls. Mice were infected with 106 TCID50 of H7N9, H1N1, or H5N1 virus to compare the virulence of strains.

We anesthetized female 4-week-old mice using isoflurane, and then inoculated them intranasally with the appropriate virus. Heart, liver, spleen, lungs, kidney, intestines, brain tissue specimens and turbinate samples were collected from mice and placed into 10% (w/v) phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) on 1, 2, 3, 5, and 7 dpi (Additional file 2: Table S1). Viruses were titrated in MDCK cells and virus titer was expressed as TCID50, as per the Reed-Muench method. We euthanized six mice for every virus at each time point. Additionally, three mice were sacrificed for every virus at each time point, with lungs, intestines, and brain tissues collected for immunohistochemical and pathological analysis. The remaining 10 mice in each group were observed daily for weight loss and mortality until 14 dpi.

Murine model of H7N9 virus transmission

Three groups of mice were used in this study. For each group, three 4-week-old BALB/c mice were infected, and seven naïve mice were placed in direct contact with infected mice (Additional file 2: Table S1). The three infected mice were lightly anesthetized and inoculated intranasally with 50 μl of 107 TCID50 virus in PBS as previously described. At 24 hpi, all materials in the cage were replaced and sterilized, and the seven naïve mice (co-housed mice) were placed in the same cage. The seven co-housed mice were observed daily, with detailed recording of clinical signs and weight loss continuing until 14 dpi. To monitor viral shedding, nasal washes were collected from seven co-housed mice at 3, 5, and 7 dpi. One group of mice was used for each time point. We dripped 50 μl of PBS into the nose of each mouse; the liquid was then allowed to fall back into a collection tube. This was repeated three times. The seven co-housed mice were then euthanized at 3, 5, and 7 dpi. The lungs, kidney, brain, and intestines were collected, and immersed into 1 ml of PBS. Virus titers in the tissues were determined using MDCK cells as previously described [27]. The number of co-housed mice that became infected was calculated by determining the virus titer in the lungs, brain, and nose at 5 and 7 days after co-housing. Pathological examination of the lungs and intestines occurred on days 3 and 7. Sera were obtained from co-housed mice on 14 dpi to confirm seroconversion using hemagglutination inhibition (HI) assays with 0.5% chicken erythrocytes.

Secretions from H7N9-infected mice

To collect eye secretions (ESs), a swab pre-wetted with PBS was used to wipe the eyes of six mice (5–7 wipes) at 1, 2, and 3 dpi, and then placed into 1 ml of PBS. Throat swabs (TSs) were collected from inoculated mice at 1, 2, and 3 dpi, and transferred to 1 ml of PBS. The ESs and TSs were vortexed and centrifuged (300 g, 10 min), and the supernatants filtered. Five pellets of fecal (F) samples from inoculated animals were collected at 5 dpi and placed into 10% (w/v) PBS, vortexed, and centrifuged (300 g, 10 min). Supernatants were then filtered. The liquid from the ES, TS, and F samples were used to intranasally inoculate mice on days 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Six inoculated mice were then euthanized at 4 dpi (Additional file 2: Table S1). Tissues from the lungs, nasal cavity, and intestines were collected in 1 ml of PBS. Viral titers in tissues were determined using MDCK cells as previously described.

Transmission route of H7N9 in mice

Conjunctival secretions from H7N9-infected mice were used to wipe the eyes of twelve naïve mice (Eye). Pharynx secretions were injected into the tail veins (150 μl per mouse) of naïve mice (IV). The secretion was concentrated using a hyperfiltration tube (Millipore Amicon). The virus titer of conjunctival secretions was 103.8 TCID50, while that for pharynx secretions was 103.8 TCID50. Similar virus titers were seen for the fecal suspensions. Six naïve mice were given the fecal suspensions from H7N9-infected by gavage administration (Or; 200 μl per mouse). Six mice infected through Or, Eye and IV routes were autopsied at 3 and 5 dpi. Three mice were used for the isolation of lung, tracheal, and intestinal tissues for pathological and histochemical examinations at 5 dpi. Three mice were used to obtain nasal washes and lung tissues to determine virus titers at 3 and 5 dpi (Additional file 2: Table S1).

Virus titrations

Virus titrations were performed by end-point titration in MDCK cells. MDCK cells were inoculated with 100.5-fold serial dilutions of homogenized tissues, nasal washes, and TSs. At 1 hpi, cells were washed once with PBS and incubated in 200 μl of infection medium (EMEM, 100 U/ml penicillin, 100 μg/ml streptomycin, and 1 μg/ml TPCK-trypsin). At 3 dpi, supernatants of infected cell cultures were tested for agglutinating activity using turkey erythrocytes as an indicator of cellular infection. Infectious titers were calculated from five replicates using the Reed-Muench method [27].

Histopathology and immunohistochemistry (IHC)

Animal necropsies were performed according to standard protocols. Samples for histological examination, comprising formalin-inflated lungs, were stored in 10% neutral-buffered formalin, embedded in paraffin, and sectioned (4-μm thickness). The sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin (HE) for examination by light microscopy, or via an immunohistochemical method using a monoclonal antibody against the nucleoprotein of influenza A virus. All slides were examined by a pathologist with 10 years’ experience, and results were confirmed by a second pathologist.

HI assays

Standard HI assays were performed on post-exposure mouse sera using 0.5% turkey erythrocytes against homologous virus. Sera were collected from inoculated or naïve mice at 14 dpi or 14 days after coming into contact with infected mice, respectively, and tested for the presence of H7N9-specific antibodies.

Statistical analysis

Differences in body weight, viral copy numbers, and virus titers among groups were analyzed by one-way ANOVA and post-hoc Bonferroni correction. Differences between two groups were analyzed by Student’s t-test using SPSS 11.5. A P- value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Notes

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by grants from the National Science and Technology Major Projects of Infectious Disease (2012ZX10004501-004, 2012ZX10004404, and 2012ZX10004301-8), the special project on human H7N9 viruses from the Ministry of Science and Technology of China (KJYJ-2013-01-04), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31370203), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (2012Y02 and 2012D15), and the Open Fund of the Key Laboratory of Human Disease Comparative Medicine, Ministry of Health (DWS201214).

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Institute of Laboratory Animal Sciences, Comparative Medicine Center, Peking Union Medical Collage (PUMC); Key Laboratory of Human Disease Comparative Medicine, Ministry of Health, No. 5 Pan Jia Yuan Nan Li, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences (CAMS)
(2)
Department of Microbiology and the Research Center of Infection and Immunology, State Key Laboratory for Emerging Infectious Diseases, The University of Hong Kong,

References

  1. Gao R, Cao B, Hu Y, Feng Z, Wang D, Hu W, Chen J, Jie Z, Qiu H, Xu K, Xu X, Lu H, Zhu W, Gao Z, Xiang N, Shen Y, He Z, Gu Y, Zhang Z, Yang Y, Zhao X, Zhou L, Li X, Zou S, Zhang Y, Li X, Yang L, Guo J, Dong J, Li Q, et al.: Human Infection with a Novel Avian-Origin Influenza A (H7N9) Virus. N Engl J Med 2013,368(20):1888-1897. 10.1056/NEJMoa1304459PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Horby P: H7N9 is a virus worth worrying about. Nature 2013, 496: 399. 10.1038/496399aPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Koopmans M, de Jong MD: Avian influenza A H7N9 in Zhejiang, China. Lancet 2013,381(9881):1882-1883. 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60936-8PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Wu S, Wu F, He J: Emerging risk of H7N9 influenza in China. Lancet 2013, 381: 1539-1540.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Zhang W, Wang L, Hu W, Ding F, Sun H, Li S, Huang L, Li C: Epidemiological characteristics of cases for influenza A (H7N9) virus infections in China. Clin Infect Dis 2013,57(4):619-620.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Uyeki TM, Cox NJ: Global concerns regarding novel influenza A (H7N9) virus infections. N Engl J Med 2013,368(20):1862-1864. 10.1056/NEJMp1304661PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Yu H, Wu JT, Cowling BJ, Liao Q, Fang VJ, Zhou S, Wu P, Zhou H, Lau EH, Guo D, Ni MY, Peng Z, Feng L, Jiang H, Luo H, Li Q, Feng Z, Wang Y, Yang W, Leung GM: Effect of closure of live poultry markets on poultry-to-person transmission of avian influenza A H7N9 virus: an ecological study. Lancet 2014, 383: 541-548. 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61904-2PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Koopmans M, Wilbrink B, Conyn M, Natrop G, van der Nat H, Vennema H, Meijer A, van Steenbergen J, Fouchier R, Osterhaus A, Bosman A: Transmission of H7N7 avian influenza A virus to human beings during a large outbreak in commercial poultry farms in the Netherlands. Lancet 2004, 363: 587-593. 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)15589-XPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Li Q, Zhou L, Zhou M, Chen Z, Li F, Wu H, Xiang N, Chen E, Tang F, Wang D: Preliminary report: epidemiology of the avian influenza A (H7N9) outbreak in China. N Engl J Med 2013,370(6):520-532.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Parry J: H7N9 virus is more transmissible and harder to detect than H5N1, say experts. BMJ 2013, 346: f2568. 10.1136/bmj.f2568PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Xu L, Bao L, Deng W, Dong L, Zhu H, Chen T, Lv Q, Li F, Yuan J, Xiang Z, Gao K, Xu Y, Huang L, Li Y, Liu J, Yao Y, Yu P, Li X, Huang W, Zhao X, Lan Y, Guo J, Yong W, Wei Q, Chen H, Zhang L, Qin C: Novel avian-origin human influenza A(H7N9) can be transmitted between ferrets via respiratory droplets. J Infect Dis 2014, 209: 551-556. 10.1093/infdis/jit474PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Edenborough KM, Gilbertson BP, Brown LE: A mouse model for the study of contact-dependent transmission of influenza A virus and the factors that govern transmissibility. J Virol 2012, 86: 12544-12551. 10.1128/JVI.00859-12PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Meng Z, Han R, Hu Y, Yuan Z, Jiang S, Zhang X, Xu J: Possible pandemic threat from new reassortment of influenza A(H7N9) virus in China. Euro surveillance 2014,19(6):20699.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Belser JA, Gustin KM, Pearce MB, Maines TR, Zeng H, Pappas C, Sun X, Carney PJ, Villanueva JM, Stevens J, Katz JM, Tumpey TM: Pathogenesis and transmission of avian influenza A (H7N9) virus in ferrets and mice. Nature 2013, 501: 556-559. 10.1038/nature12391PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Xu L, Bao L, Li F, Lv Q, Ma Y, Zhou J, Xu Y, Deng W, Zhan L, Zhu H, Ma C, Shu Y, Qin C: Adaption of seasonal H1N1 influenza virus in mice. PLoS One 2011, 6: e28901. 10.1371/journal.pone.0028901PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Jurgens HA, Amancherla K, Johnson RW: Influenza infection induces neuroinflammation, alters hippocampal neuron morphology, and impairs cognition in adult mice. J Neurosci 2012, 32: 3958-3968. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.6389-11.2012PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Kocer ZA, Krauss S, Stallknecht DE, Rehg JE, Webster RG: The potential of avian H1N1 influenza A viruses to replicate and cause disease in mammalian models. PLoS One 2012, 7: e41609. 10.1371/journal.pone.0041609PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Dong W, Li-Feng X, Cun-Lian W, Ming-Ju X, Rui-Hua Z, Ying L, Tong X: A mouse model of swine influenza virus H9N2 infection with acute lung injury. Acta Virol 2012, 56: 227-233. 10.4149/av_2012_03_227PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Tait AR, Davidson BA, Johnson KJ, Remick DG, Knight PR: Halothane inhibits the intraalveolar recruitment of neutrophils, lymphocytes, and macrophages in response to influenza virus infection in mice. Anesth Analg 1993, 76: 1106-1113.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Blisard KS, Davis LE: The sequence of changes in liver and brain in the influenza B virus mouse model of Reye’s syndrome. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 1990, 49: 498-508. 10.1097/00005072-199009000-00005PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Hodgson NR, Bohnet SG, Majde JA, Krueger JM: Influenza virus pathophysiology and brain invasion in mice with functional and dysfunctional Mx1 genes. Brain Behav Immun 2011, 26: 83-89.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Maines TR, Lu XH, Erb SM, Edwards L, Guarner J, Greer PW, Nguyen DC, Szretter KJ, Chen LM, Thawatsupha P, Chittaganpitch M, Waicharoen S, Nguyen DT, Nguyen T, Nguyen HH, Kim JH, Hoang LT, Kang C, Phuong LS, Lim W, Zaki S, Donis RO, Cox NJ, Katz JM, Tumpey TM: Avian influenza (H5N1) viruses isolated from humans in Asia in 2004 exhibit increased virulence in mammals. J Virol 2005, 79: 11788-11800. 10.1128/JVI.79.18.11788-11800.2005PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Reinacher M, Bonin J, Narayan O, Scholtissek C: Pathogenesis of neurovirulent influenza A virus infection in mice. Route of entry of virus into brain determines infection of different populations of cells. Lab Invest 1983, 49: 686-692.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Mok CK, Lee HH, Chan MC, Sia SF, Lestra M, Nicholls JM, Zhu H, Guan Y, Peiris JM: Pathogenicity of the novel A/H7N9 influenza virus in mice. MBio 2013, 4: e00362-13. doi:10.1128/mBio.00362-13PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Pantin-Jackwood MJ, Miller PJ, Spackman E, Swayne DE, Susta L, Costa-Hurtado M, Suarez DL: Role of poultry in spread of novel H7N9 influenza virus in China. J Virol 2014,88(10):5381-5390. 10.1128/JVI.03689-13PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Zhou J, Wang D, Gao R, Zhao B, Song J, Qi X, Zhang Y, Shi Y, Yang L, Zhu W, Bai T, Qin K, Lan Y, Zou S, Guo J, Dong J, Dong L, Zhang Y, Wei H, Li X, Lu J, Liu L, Zhao X, Li X, Huang W, Wen L, Bo H, Xin L, Chen Y, Xu C, et al.: Biological features of novel avian influenza A (H7N9) virus. Nature 2013,499(7459):500-503. 10.1038/nature12379PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Reed LJ, Muench H: A simple method of estimating fifty percent endpoints. Am J Hyg 1938, 27: 493-497.Google Scholar

Copyright

© Bao et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Advertisement