Skip to main content

Identification of a conserved neutralizing epitope in Seneca Valley virus VP2 protein: new insight for epitope vaccine designment

Abstract

Background

Seneca Valley virus (SVV) is a picornavirus that causes vesicular disease in swine. Clinical characteristics of the disease are similar to common viral diseases such as foot-and-mouth disease virus, porcine vesicular disease virus, and vesicular stomatitis virus, which can cause vesicles in the nose or hoof of pigs. Therefore, developing tools for detecting SVV infection is critical and urgent.

Methods

The neutralizing antibodies were produced to detect the neutralizing epitope.

Results

Five SVV neutralizing monoclonal antibodies (mAb), named 2C8, 3E4, 4C3, 6D7, and 7C11, were generated by immunizing mouses with ultra-purified SVV-LNSY01-2017. All five monoclonal antibodies exhibited high neutralizing titers to SVV. The epitopes targeted by these mAbs were further identified by peptide scanning using GST fusion peptides. The peptide 153QELNEE158 is defined as the smallest linear neutralizing epitope. The antibodies showed no reactivity to VP2 single mutants E157A. Furthermore, the antibodies showed no neutralizing activity with the recombinant virus (SVV-E157A).

Conclusions

The five monoclonal antibodies and identified epitopes may contribute to further research on the structure and function of VP2 and the development of diagnostic methods for detecting different SVV strains. Additionally, the epitope recognized by monoclonal antibodies against VP2 protein may provide insights for novel SVV vaccines and oncolytic viruses development.

Background

Seneca Valley virus (SVV) is a positive single-stranded RNA virus belonging to the Picornaviridae [1]. In the early stage of infection, the virus colonizes the tonsils and begins to replicate and multiply in large quantities, and then enters the bloodstream to cause viremia, which passes through the blood circulation and enters the main organs [2, 3]. And in the early stage of the disease, the sick pigs showed anorexia, lameness, fever, and snooze; then the skin or mucous membranes such as the nose, tongue, and hooves formed white swelling, followed by ulceration [3,4,5]. The first strain of Seneca Valley virus (SVV-001) was isolated in 2002 [6]. It was used to treat certain neuroendocrine tumors, such as non-small cell lung cancer [7]. Therefore, it has always been considered a non-pathogenic virus. Since 2015, a large number of SVV infections has been observed in piglets in Brazil [8], the United States [9], and China [10, 11]. The veterinary diagnostic laboratory at Iowa State University in the United States has sequenced the whole gene and found that the homology of all newly isolated strains is as high as 99%-100%. However, the difference was significant compared to the early SVV (1988–2011) sequence [12]. Phylogenetic tree analysis showed that SVV has mutated in the past 30 years with increased pathogenicity.

SVV virion is an icosahedral structure with no capsule and a diameter of 27 nm. The viral genome contains 7280 nucleotides [13]. SVV genome contains a single open reading frame (ORF) encoded by 6543 nt, which is cleaved into four structural proteins and eight non-structural proteins [14]. The P1 polypeptide is cleaved by 3C protease into VP0, VP3, and VP1, which constitute the viral nucleocapsid, and the mature VP0 is cleaved to form VP2 and VP4 [1]. VP1, VP2, and VP3 proteins are distributed on the outer surface of the capsid, while VP4 protein is on the inner surface of the capsid [1, 15]. Previous studies have shown that VP1, VP2, and VP3 proteins can induce the production of neutralizing antibodies. The antigenicity is relatively strong and conservative, and the proteins can be considered the main diagnostic target antigen of SVV [16,17,18,19].

To promote a comprehensive study of SVV infection and antiviral molecular mechanisms, we have prepared a series of neutralizing monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) against SVV VP2 protein in this study. The function of these monoclonal antibodies has been verified by neutralization assay, indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (iELISA), indirect immunofluorescence assay (IFA), and western blot. The epitope recognized by monoclonal antibodies against VP2 protein may provide new insight for vaccine development against SVV virulent strains.

Methods

Reagents and materials

SVV-LNSY01-2017 used in this study was isolated from the pig with Porcine primary vesicular disease (PIVD). Baby hamster kidney cells (BHK21 cells; ATCC, CCL-10) were cultured in Dulbecco’s modified essential medium (HyClone, SH30022.01) containing 10% fetal bovine serum (Gibco, 16000044) and 100 U/ml of penicillin (GENVIEW, GA3502) at 37 °C in a humidified 5% CO2 incubator. Myeloma cells SP2/0 (ATCC, CRL-1581) were grown in RPMI 1640 medium (HyClone, SH30809.01) containing 10% FBS, 100 U/ml of penicillin grown under the same conditions as those described above. SPF level BalB/c mice were purchased from the Animal Experimental Center of Huazhong Agricultural University. Protein A/G Agarose (sc-2003) was purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology. Alexa Fluor 555 goat anti-mouse (A32727) antibodies were obtained from Invitrogen. Polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF, 46978100) membranes were purchased from Roche.

Virus propagation and purification

BHK-21 cells were infected with an amount of 0.01 MOI SVV-LNSY01-2017 when the cell culture area reached 80%. BHK-21 cells with typical cytopathic effects (CPE) were collected at 48 h post-infection (hpi) and then repeatedly frozen and thawed 2 times, and then the virus solution was harvested. The virus solution was concentrated and precipitated at 30,000 rotating speed per minute (r/min), and then the supernatant was discarded and the precipitation was resuspended with PBS (pH = 7.4). The precipitation was dissolved at 4 °C for 12 h, and then the supernatant was collected by centrifugation at 12,000 rpm and then centrifuged at 40,000 rpm by a sucrose gradient. Subsequently, the virus band was taken up for de-sucrose treatment, and the precipitation was resuspended with PBS (pH = 7.4) and stored at − 80 °C. Purified viruses were further identified by SDS-PAGE and western blot analysis.

Monoclonal antibody production

4-week-old female SPF BalB/c mice purchased from the Laboratory Animal Center of Huazhong Agricultural University (Wuhan, China), were subcutaneously immunized with 40 µg of purified SVV-LNSY01-2017 particles with an equal amount of complete Freund's adjuvant. After the initial immunization, mice were immunized 2 times with the same dose of purified SVV-LNSY01-2017 particles with an equal amount of incomplete Freund's adjuvant at two-week intervals. After mice were immunized three times, serum samples were collected from the immunized mice and serum titers were detected by indirect ELISA/virus neutralization assay. Three days after the fourth booster immunization, mice splenocytes were harvested and fused with SP2/0 using 50% polyethylene glycol (50% PEG, Sigma, Aldrich). Hybridoma culture supernatants were screened by virus neutralization assay and the positive hybridoma cells were cloned by a limiting dilution. Stable hybridoma clones (106 cells) were injected intraperitoneally into liquid paraffin-pretreated abdominal cavities of BalB/c mice. Then the monoclonal antibodies were harvested and purified by a Protein A/G purification kit (NAbTMProtein A/G Spin Kit, Thermo Scientific, Fremont, CA, USA), and their activity was characterized by western blot and indirect immunofluorescence assay (IFA).

Virus neutralization assay

The antibody-secreting hybridoma cells are screened by virus neutralization assay. Briefly, the hybridoma cell supernatant was serially diluted twofold, mixed with 200 TCID50 SVV-LNSY01-2017 in equal volumes, and placed in a 37 °C CO2 incubator for 2 h. The mixture was inoculated into a single layer of BHK-21 cells in a 96-well plate at 100 μL/well and cultured for 3 to 4 days in a CO2 incubator at 37 °C. Then the cytopathic condition was recorded to identify neutralizing hybridoma cells. The neutralizing hybridoma cells were subcloned into new 96-well plates by limiting dilution. After three rounds of subcloning, the hybridoma cells capable of stably secreting neutralizing antibodies were obtained.

Indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay

ELISA plates were coated overnight at 4 °C with 100 μL of inactivated SVV-LNSY01-2017 (1 μg/mL) diluted in bicarbonate coating buffer (1.59 g/L Na2CO3 and 2.93 g/L NaHCO3, pH = 9.6). The wells of the plate were washed 3 times with PBS and then blocked with 5.0% bovine serum albumin (BSA) in PBS (PBSA) for 2 h at 37 °C. The wells were drained and incubated with 100 μL of two-fold serially diluted mAbs (from 1:100 to 1:12,800) for 1 h at 37 °C. The wells were then washed three times with PBS containing 0.05% Tween-20 (PBST) and then incubated with 100 μL of horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG (1:10,000, Boster, Wuhan, China) for 1 h at 37 °C. After 3 times washing with PBST, the reactions were developed with 50 μL/well substrate A (0.1 M citrate/phosphate buffer [pH 5.0]) and 50 μL/well solution B (0.04% o-phenylenediamine; 0.14% H2O2) for 10 min at room temperature and then terminated with 50 μL/well of 2 M H2SO4. The optical densities (OD) at 630 nm were measured using a microplate reader.

Western blot identification of monoclonal antibodies

293 T cells were transfected with plasmids to express the indicated protein. At 24 h posttransfection, cells were harvested and treated with lysis buffer (1.19% HEPES, 0.88% NaCl, 0.04% EDTA, 1% NP-40) containing a protease inhibitor (Roche, UK), and then incubated on ice for 30 min. Equal amounts of proteins were subjected to 12% sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) and then the separated protein was transferred onto polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) membranes (Roche, UK). The membrane was blocked with 5% skim milk at room temperature for 2 h, and then the membrane was incubated with the indicated antibodies for 2 h at room temperature. The membrane was washed 5 times with PBST, and then incubated with horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-labeled goat anti-mouse IgG (1:5000) for 1 h. The positive bands were visualized by electrochemiluminescence (ECL) reagents and developed on film.

Indirect immunofluorescence identification

BHK-21 cells were cultured in 96-well plates. When the cells are full of a single layer, the cells were inoculated with 2000 TCID50 SVV-LNSY01-2017. When the cell cytopathic effect reached 70–80%, it was fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 30 min and permeated with 0.2% Triton X-100 at room temperature for 20 min. The cells were blocked with PBS (pH = 7.4) containing 3% BSA for 30 min and then washed with PBS three times. 100 μL/well of hybridoma cell supernatant was added to different culture wells and the samples were incubated at 37℃ for 1 h. After the cells were washed with PBS three times, Alexa Fluor 555 goat anti-mouse antibodies (1:1000 dilution) were added and the samples were incubated for 30 min in dark at room temperature. The results were observed under a fluorescence microscope.

Construction of mutant infectious SVV cDNA clones

Infectious SVV cDNA clones were conserved in our laboratory. Mutagenesis of SVV-E157A construct was performed using site-directed mutagenesis (C214-01/02; Vazyme). The construct was identified through DNA sequencing. To rescue viruses, plasmids containing full-length viral cDNAs were transfected into 293 T cells using JetPRIME (PT-114–07; Polyplus Transfection) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. When about 70% of cells exhibited CPE, the media was collected. Then the virus was serially passaged five times on BHK-21 cells. Stocks from each passage were stored at -80˚C. Each passage viruses were sequenced to identify the stability of the virus.

Statistical analysis

The preceding experiments were performed in triplicate. The various treatments were compared by an unpaired, two-tailed Student's t-test while assuming unequal variance. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Meanwhile, P < 0.001 and P < 0.0001 were marked with two (**) and three (***) asterisks, respectively.

Results

Preparation of immunogen

To obtain large batches of viruses, BHK-21 cells were infected with 0.01 MOI SVV. When the CPE occurred, the virus solution was collected after the cells were frozen and thawed. Viral bands were obtained by ultra-high-speed centrifugation and sucrose gradient centrifugation, and the purified virus was confirmed by SDS-PAGE. As shown in Fig. 1A, SVV structural proteins VP1, VP2, VP3, and VP4 were correct in size, and impurity protein was less in lane 8. Western blot analysis was performed using SVV VP1 antibodies. The result showed that VP1 protein was detected and the size was as expected (Fig. 1B). The result demonstrated that we obtained high purity and high concentration of SVV particles, and the purified virus can be used to immunize mice to manufacture mAbs.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Immunogen preparation. A Components of the samples during ultra-high speed centrifugation were analyzed by SDS-PAGE and visualized by Coomassie blue staining. 1: Clear cell debris; 2: Concentrated supernatant; 3: Concentrated precipitate; 4: Sample layer; 5: 20% sucrose layer; 6: 35% sucrose layer; 7: 50% sucrose layer; 8: Virus Bands layer; 9: 65% sucrose layer; M: Protein Marker. B After the virus was desucrosed, the rabbit-derived antibody against SVV VP1 protein prepared in our laboratory was used as a primary antibody, and the purified SVV was identified by western blot. M: Protein Marker

Functional analysis of mAbs

To verify whether these monoclonal antibodies are suitable for IFA measurement, a single layer of BHK-21 cells was infected with 0.01 MOI SVV. After cytopathic effect (CPE) occurred, the cells were stained with the prepared five monoclonal antibodies. As shown in Fig. 2A, the cells staining with monoclonal antibodies displayed bright red fluorescence signals while the cells staining with SP2/0 cultured supernatant did not, indicating that all the antibodies can react well with viral proteins. Subsequently, we performed neutralizing titer tests of these monoclonal antibodies. BHK-21 cells were incubated with virus-antibody mixtures and cultured for 3 days. The Reed-Muench method was used to calculate the neutralization titer. The results showed that the ascites neutralization titers of the five antibodies were significantly higher than those of the culture supernatant, and the ascites neutralization titers of 2C8 and 3E4 could reach 1: 210 (Fig. 2B). Next, we tested the application of these prepared mAbs in ELISA. The readout of the ELISA plate demonstrated that all five mAbs can be used as primary antibodies to detect SVV-LNSY01-2017 by using the ELISA assay (Fig. 2C). Western blot analysis showed that all mAbs can react with VP2, but not VP1 or VP3 (Fig. 2D). Collectively, these results indicate that five neutralizing antibodies react with SVV VP2.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Functional analysis of monoclonal antibodies. A BHK-21 cells were infected with 0.01 MOI SVV-LNSY01-2017 for 36 h and then conducted for immunostaining analysis with 5 monoclonal antibodies. The mouse SP2/0 cell culture supernatant was used as a negative control. The cells were analyzed by an inverted fluorescence microscope. Scale bar: 200 μm. B The hybridoma cell supernatant and purified ascites of the five monoclonal antibodies were twofold multiple dilution and mixed with 200 TCID50 SVV. BHK-21 cells were incubated with virus-antibody mixtures to determine their neutralizing titers. C The prepared five monoclonal antibodies were used as primary antibodies in an indirect ELISA to test their reactivity with the virus. D 293 T cells were transfected with plasmids encoding VP1, VP2, or VP3. The cell lysates were conducted for western blot analysis with 5 monoclonal antibodies

Epitope mapping of VP2 protein

To determine the linear epitopes recognized by these prepared monoclonal antibodies, the full length of SVV VP2 gene was truncated to 8 parts, with 20 bp overlap between adjacent parts (Fig. 3A), and the truncations were constructed into the pGEX-KG vector for expression of eight truncated proteins. Western blot analysis showed that all eight truncated proteins were successfully expressed in BL21 (DE3) E.coli. Strikingly, all five monoclonal antibodies recognized fragments containing the region 143-166aa (Fig. 3B). To determine the fine epitopes of these mAbs, nine truncations between the 143-166aa region were constructed (Fig. 3C). The results showed that all five antibodies recognized the fragment containing the polypeptide 153QELNEE158 (Fig. 3D), indicating that the polypeptide 153QELNEE158 was the smallest linear epitope required to bind the monoclonal antibodies.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Identification of VP2 protein neutralizing linear epitopes by the antibodies. A Schematic diagram of the SVV VP2 protein fragment used for epitope mapping. V1: 1-110aa; V2: 100-200aa; V3: 190-284aa; V4: 100-138aa; V5: 129-166aa; V6: 157-200aa; V7: 100-153aa; V8: 143-200aa. B 293 T cells were transfected with plasmids encoding VP2 truncations for 24 h. The cell lysates were conducted for western blot analysis with the antibodies. C Schematic diagram of the SVV VP2 protein fragment used for epitope mapping. P1: 148-284aa; P2: 154-284aa; P3: 1-159aa; P4: 1-155aa; P5: 1-157aa; P6: 150-284aa; P7: 152-284aa; P8: 153-284aa; P9: 1-158aa. D 293 T cells were transfected with plasmids encoding VP2 truncations for 24 h, and then the cell lysates were conducted for western blot analysis with the antibodies

Character analysis of the neutralizing epitope

To understand the structural mechanism of the epitope identified by the mAbs, the 3D structure was predicted using an online computer software program. The results revealed that the mAbs recognized neutralizing epitope is fully exposed on the surface of the predicted SVV VP2 structure (Fig. 4A). Sequence alignment analysis of novel epitopes from the different SVV isolates was performed to determine if the novel epitopes identified by the five neutralizing antibodies were conserved among different SVV reference strains. The results showed that the epitope 153QELNEE158 was conserved in SVV VP2 (Fig. 4B).

Fig. 4
figure 4

Character analysis of the neutralizing epitope. A The relative spatial position of the identified neutralizing epitope is presented in cartoons and spheres from a partially predicted 3D structure of SVV VP2. The epitope recognized by 6D7 is shown in yellow. B The amino acid alignment was performed on different SVV isolates VP2 protein using MEGA 7.0.26 software. The smallest linear epitope of 153QELNEE158 is shown inside the red box

Identification of the pivotal point in the neutralizing epitope

Eukaryotic recombinant expression plasmids with single-site mutants of VP2 were constructed, and recombinant proteins were obtained by transfection of 293 T cells. Western blot analysis showed that VP2 protein with a single-site mutant E157A did not react with 6D7-mAb, indicating that E157 was the pivotal point required for VP2 protein to bind the antibodies (Fig. 5A). Additionally, the recombinant virus containing the mutant E157A was constructed to evaluate whether E157A was the key neutralizing point. The virus was serially passaged five times on BHK-21 cells. Stocks from each passage were stored at -80˚C. Each passage viruses were sequenced to identify the stability of the virus. As shown in Fig. 5B, VP1 protein in both WT virus- and E157A mutant virus-infected cells can be detected, but only WT-virus VP2 protein can be detected when the primary antibody was 6D7-mAb. In addition, 6D7-mAb exhibited powerful neutralizing effects on wild-type SVV, but it showed no neutralizing effects on recombinant SVV (SVV-E157A) (Fig. 5C). Taken together, E157 is the pivotal point for 6D7-mAb to neutralize SVV.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Identification of the pivotal point in the neutralizing epitope. A Reactivity of monoclonal antibodies to VP2 mutants. B 293 T cells were infected with recombinant virus (SVV-E157A) or wild-type SVV (SVV-WT) for 8 h, and then the cells were collected for western blotting. C The neutralizing titers of 6D7-mAbs to SVV-E157A and SVV-WT

Discussion

Although SVV was successfully isolated and identified in 2002 [1], SVV infection was found to cause herd disease for the first time when there was an outbreak of the porcine idiopathic vesicular disease in 2007 [20]. The same year, clinical signs of vesicular disease appeared in a herd of pigs at a slaughterhouse in the United States. Pig are often co-infected with SVV and other vesicular viruses [19], and the clinical symptoms between SVV and other vesicular viruses are difficult to distinguish [1, 8]. Therefore, the development of monoclonal antibodies is undoubtedly important for the establishment of immunological detection methods. Additionally, neutralizing antibodies can be used to treat viral infections. Due to its oncolytic effect, SVV was often used to explore human cancer treatment [14, 21, 22]. Nevertheless, neutralizing antibodies induced by SVV impaired its oncolytic effect. The construction of a recombinant virus with neutralizing epitope mutations contributes to SVV oncolytic effects.

The capsid protein of SVV is composed of four structural proteins: VP1, VP2, VP3, and VP4, which contain the main epitope region. Dvorak used a modified prokaryotic expression vector pET-24b to express and then purified VP1, VP2, and VP3 proteins and coated the three recombinant proteins with ELISA plates, respectively [18]. Through the verification of a large number of clinical samples, it was found that the sensitivity and specificity of the ELISA plate coated with the VP2 protein alone were better than that of the ELISA plate coated with the VP1 and VP3 proteins. And Goolia used cELISA, VNT, and IFAT to continuously detect antibodies in SVV-infected pig serum [17]. The diagnostic specificity and sensitivity for cELISA were 98.2% and 96.9%, and for VNT were 99.6% and 98.2%. When comparing based on the Kappa coefficient, there is a strong agreement between cELISA, VNT, and IFAT. Virus ultra-high-speed centrifugation is an effective method to obtain high concentration and high purity antigen. In 2017, Mike Strauss used the ultra-ionization purification method and obtained high purity virus particles through a cesium chloride gradient. Three structural proteins VP1, VP2, and VP3 can be seen by SDS-PAGE detection. To develop specific tools to assist SVV detection, we prepared high-purity SVV virus particles and generated 5 monoclonal antibodies against neutralizing epitopes. These five antibodies all recognize the linear epitopes 153QELNEE158 of VP2 protein, which is conserved among SVV. We also construct the recombinant virus and further demonstrate that E157 is the pivotal point for 6D7-mAb to neutralize SVV. After a comprehensive analysis of the experimental results of Goolia and Dvorak, we speculate that VP2 is likely to be the major immunogenic protein.

Functional analysis showed that all five mAbs can be used for ELISA, western blot, and IFA assays. In addition, the SVV neutralizing activity of the five mAbs was determined by neutralization assay, and the highest neutralizing titer reached 1: 210. In conclusion, we have prepared five neutralizing monoclonal antibodies against SVV VP2 protein to facilitate the early detection of SVV infection using ELISA, western blot, and IFA.

Conclusions

In the present study, we obtain five SVV neutralizing monoclonal antibodies and identify that E157 is the key amino acid site of the VP2 neutralizing epitope. The five monoclonal antibodies and identified epitopes may contribute to further research on the structure and function of VP2 and the development of diagnostic methods for detecting different SVV strains. Additionally, the epitope recognized by monoclonal antibodies against VP2 protein may provide insights for novel SVV vaccines and oncolytic viruses development.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analyzed in this study are included in this published article.

Abbreviations

SVV:

Seneca Valley virus

ORF:

Open reading frame

iELISA:

Indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay

IFA:

Indirect immunofluorescence assay

CPE:

Cytopathic effect

MOI:

Multiplicity of infection

WT:

Wild type

References

  1. Hales LM, Knowles NJ, Reddy PS, Xu L, Hay C, Hallenbeck PL. Complete genome sequence analysis of Seneca Valley virus-001, a novel oncolytic picornavirus. J Gen Virol. 2008;89:1265–75.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Leme RA, Alfieri AF, Alfieri AA. Update on Senecavirus infection in Pigs. Viruses. 2017;9:e170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Joshi LR, Fernandes MHV, Clement T, Lawson S, Pillatzki A, Resende TP, Vannucci FA, Kutish GF, Nelson EA, Diel DG. Pathogenesis of Senecavirus A infection in finishing pigs. J Gen Virol. 2016;97:3267–79.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Leme RA, Oliveira TE, Alcantara BK, Headley SA, Alfieri AF, Yang M, Alfieri AA. Clinical manifestations of Senecavirus A infection in Neonatal Pigs, Brazil, 2015. Emerg Infect Dis. 2016;22:1238–41.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Montiel N, Buckley A, Guo B, Kulshreshtha V, VanGeelen A, Hoang H, Rademacher C, Yoon KJ, Lager K. Vesicular disease in 9-week-old pigs experimentally infected with Senecavirus A. Emerg Infect Dis. 2016;22:1246–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Venkataraman S, Reddy SP, Loo J, Idamakanti N, Hallenbeck PL, Reddy VS. Structure of Seneca Valley Virus-001: an oncolytic picornavirus representing a new genus. Structure. 2008;16:1555–61.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Poirier JT, Dobromilskaya I, Moriarty WF, Peacock CD, Hann CL, Rudin CM. Selective tropism of Seneca Valley virus for variant subtype small cell lung cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2013;105:1059–65.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Leme RA, Zotti E, Alcantara BK, Oliveira MV, Freitas LA, Alfieri AF, Alfieri AA. Senecavirus A: an emerging vesicular infection in Brazilian pig herds. Transbound Emerg Dis. 2015;62:603–11.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Canning P, Canon A, Bates JL, Gerardy K, Linhares DC, Pineyro PE, Schwartz KJ, Yoon KJ, Rademacher CJ, Holtkamp D, Karriker L. Neonatal mortality, vesicular lesions and lameness associated with Senecavirus A in a U.S. Sow Farm. Transbound Emerg Dis. 2016;63:373–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Wu Q, Zhao X, Bai Y, Sun B, Xie Q, Ma J. The first identification and complete genome of Senecavirus A affecting pig with idiopathic vesicular disease in China. Transbound Emerg Dis. 2017;64:1633–40.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Qian S, Fan W, Qian P, Chen H, Li X. Isolation and full-genome sequencing of Seneca Valley virus in piglets from China, 2016. Virol J. 2016;13:173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Willcocks MM, Locker N, Gomwalk Z, Royall E, Bakhshesh M, Belsham GJ, Idamakanti N, Burroughs KD, Reddy PS, Hallenbeck PL, Roberts LO. Structural features of the Seneca Valley virus internal ribosome entry site (IRES) element: a picornavirus with a pestivirus-like IRES. J Virol. 2011;85:4452–61.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Pinheiro-de-Oliveira TF, Fonseca-Junior AA, Camargos MF, Laguardia-Nascimento M, Giannattasio-Ferraz S, Cottorello ACP, de Oliveira AM, Goes-Neto A, Barbosa-Stancioli EF. Reverse transcriptase droplet digital PCR to identify the emerging vesicular virus Senecavirus A in biological samples. Transbound Emerg Dis. 2019;66:1360–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Segalés J, Barcellos D, Alfieri A, Burrough E, Marthaler D. Senecavirus A. Vet Pathol. 2016;54:11–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Strauss M, Jayawardena N, Sun E, Easingwood RA, Burga LN, Bostina M. Cryo-Electron Microscopy Structure of Seneca Valley Virus Procapsid. J Virol. 2018;92:e01927.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Maggioli MF, Lawson S, de Lima M, Joshi LR, Faccin TC, Bauermann FV, Diel DG. Adaptive Immune Responses following Senecavirus A Infection in Pigs. J Virol. 2018;92:e01717.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Goolia M, Vannucci F, Yang M, Patnayak D, Babiuk S, Nfon CK. Validation of a competitive ELISA and a virus neutralization test for the detection and confirmation of antibodies to Senecavirus A in swine sera. J Vet Diagn Invest. 2017;29:250–3.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Dvorak CM, Akkutay-Yoldar Z, Stone SR, Tousignant SJ, Vannucci FA, Murtaugh MP. An indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for the identification of antibodies to Senecavirus A in swine. BMC Vet Res. 2017;13:50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Bracht AJ, O’Hearn ES, Fabian AW, Barrette RW, Sayed A. Real-time reverse transcription PCR assay for detection of Senecavirus A in Swine vesicular diagnostic specimens. PLoS ONE. 2016;11:e0146211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Pasma T, Davidson S, Shaw SL. Idiopathic vesicular disease in swine in Manitoba. Can Vet J. 2008;49:84–5.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Reddy PS, Burroughs KD, Hales LM, Ganesh S, Jones BH, Idamakanti N, Hay C, Li SS, Skele KL, Vasko AJ, et al. Seneca Valley virus, a systemically deliverable oncolytic picornavirus, and the treatment of neuroendocrine cancers. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2007;99:1623–33.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Wadhwa L, Hurwitz MY, Chevez-Barrios P, Hurwitz RL. Treatment of invasive retinoblastoma in a murine model using an oncolytic picornavirus. Cancer Res. 2007;67:10653–6.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

This work was supported by grants from the National Key R&D Program of China (2021YFD1800300), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (32072841).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

WW and QL conceived and designed research. WW and XC conducted experiments and wrote the manuscript. XL and HC contributed new methods and revised the manuscript. PQ analyzed data. All authors read and approved the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiangmin Li.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All animal experiments were performed following the National Institute of Health Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wen, W., Chen, X., Lv, Q. et al. Identification of a conserved neutralizing epitope in Seneca Valley virus VP2 protein: new insight for epitope vaccine designment. Virol J 19, 65 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12985-022-01791-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12985-022-01791-5

Keywords

  • Seneca Valley virus
  • Monoclonal antibody
  • Neutralization test
  • VP2 protein
  • Neutralizing epitope