Skip to main content

Advances in HBV infection and replication systems in vitro

Abstract

Background

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) is a DNA virus belonging to the Hepadnaviridae family that has limited tissue and species specificity. Due to the persistence of HBV covalently closed circular DNA (cccDNA) in host cells after HBV infection, current antiviral drugs cannot eradicate HBV. Therefore, the development of an active cell culture system supporting HBV infection has become the key to studying HBV and developing effective therapeutic drugs.

Main body

This review summarizes the significant research achievements in HBV cell culture systems in vitro, including embryonic hepatocytes and primary hepatocytes, which support the virus infection process most similar to that in the body and various liver tumor cells. The discovery of the bile-acid pump sodium-taurocholate co-transporting polypeptide (NTCP) as the receptor of HBV has advanced our understanding of HBV biology. Subsequently, various liver cancer cells overexpressing NTCP that support HBV infection have been established, opening a new door for studying HBV infection. The fact that induced pluripotent stem cells that differentiate into hepatocyte-like cells support HBV infection provides a novel idea for the establishment of an HBV cell culture system.

Conclusion

Because of the host and tissue specificity of HBV, a suitable in vitro HBV infection system is critical for the study of HBV pathogenesis. Nevertheless, recent advances regarding HBV infection in vitro offer hope for better studying the biological characteristics of HBV, the pathogenesis of hepatitis B, the screening of anti-HBV drugs and the mechanism of carcinogenesis.

Introduction

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) is a partially circular double-stranded DNA virus with a limited host range and high species specificity. Generally, only the liver tissue of humans, chimpanzees, and tree shrews are susceptible to HBV [1]. HBV infection can cause hepatitis and liver dysfunction, and the disease can progress to chronic infection, with some further progressing to cirrhosis or even liver cancer. It is also a severe global health problem worldwide, especially in Asia and Africa. According to the latest global epidemiological statistics regarding HBV, an estimated 257 million people are living with HBV infection (defined as hepatitis B surface antigen-positive). Approximately 1 million people die each year from liver failure, cirrhosis or primary hepatocellular carcinoma caused by HBV infection, and approximately 300,000 of these individuals reside in China. HBV is the leading cause of death among all infectious diseases. Due to the persistence of HBV covalently closed circular DNA (cccDNA) in host cells after HBV infection, antiviral drugs cannot eradicate HBV [2,3,4], and a safe and curative treatment for patients with chronic HBV infection is therefore lacking. Currently, establishing an effective HBV infection system is the key to studying viral infection mechanisms and drug screening to solve this problem. However, because of the loss of HBV receptors on the surface of hepatocytes and changes in the cell structure and growth environment under in vitro conditions [5], establishing a stable hepatic-derived HBV infection system in vitro is difficult. Currently, many HBV infection systems in vitro have been established in the field of hepatitis B research. Although these systems have shortcomings, they are useful in the study of HBV to some extent and play an important role in the development and evaluation of anti-HBV drugs.

This review summarizes representative HBV in vitro infection systems, including recombinant cell lines obtained by integrating the HBV genome into the liver cancer cell genome by genetic engineering techniques and sodium-taurocholate co-transporting polypeptide (NTCP) overexpressing hepatoma cell lines permissive for HBV infection established based on the discovery of the HBV-specific receptor bile-acid pump NTCP. Besides, the differentiation of induced pluripotent stem cells into hepatocyte-like cells (HLCs) provides more possibilities for studying HBV. The establishment of the HBV/hepatitis C virus (HCV) coinfection system provides a reliable platform for studying the interaction between HBV and HCV and the host.

HBV replication cell lines

HepG2.2.15 cells

Sells et al. introduced the recombinant vector pDoLT-HBV-1 (a vector that contains two head-to-tail dimers of HBV in a tail-to-tail orientation) and a plasmid containing the neomycin resistance gene into the human hepatoma cell line HepG2 by co-transfection and established the HepG2.2.15 cell line by G418 screening [6]. The cell line carries HBV DNA that includes gene sequences integrated into the host chromosomal, extrachromosomal relaxed circular DNA, cccDNA and an incomplete copy of the HBV genome. Besides, the cell line can produce a variety of HBV-specific mRNAs (3.5 kb, 2.5 kb, 2.1 kb) [7] and express all viral markers, stably secreting HBsAg, HBeAg and Dane particles for a long period. The concentration of HBsAg detected in the culture supernatant of HepG2.2.15 cells reached 4.2~94.3 µg/L, and 22 nm spherical and rod-shaped particles as well as 42 nm particles could be detected by immunoelectron microscopy, which confirmed that HepG2.2.15 cells could support not only the replication of HBV DNA but also the packaging and secretion of Dane particles. Since this cell line was derived from hepatoma cells, it can be subcultured for a long time. Besides, it supports continuous virus replication and produces infectious virions, so it is a widely used cell culture system for studying HBV. Although the establishment of the HepG2.2.15 cell line provides an effective model for studying the structure, function, gene expression and regulation of HBV DNA and the initial screening of anti-HBV drugs in vitro, this cell line also has certain limitations, including the following. (i) This cell line does not recapitulate natural infection: the HBV DNA is integrated into the chromosome of the host cell, so it can simulate the process of virus replication but not the process of virus invasion into cells.(ii)This cell line is insensitive to direct infection with serum containing HBV, which due to the lack of NTCP, a specific receptor for HBV infection.(iii) Although the replication and expression of HBV in hepatocytes are reproduced, this model is divorced from the environment in which the body's immune system affects HBV (iv) HepG2.2.15 cells cannot be used for the study of HBV adsorption, cellular entry or virus uncoating. (v) Since HepG2.2.15 cells were derived from HepG2 cells, they cannot be used for the study of HBV carcinogenicity. This cell line has been used in studies on the later steps of the HBV life cycle, the interaction of immune cells with cells containing HBV, and the evaluation of antiviral drugs.

HepAD38 (EF9, EFS19) cells

Ladner et al. transfected HepG2 cells with the plasmid pTet-HBV which was constructed by removing the cytomegalovirus immediate-early (CMV-IE) promoter from plasmid pCMV-HBV fused with the ayw subtype of the HBV genome and replacing it with the tetracycline-responsive CMV-IE promoter to obtain the HepAD38 cell line [8]. The HepAD38 cell genome contains 1.1 copies of the HBV genome, whose expression is regulated by the inducible CMV-IE promoter. Due to the disruption of the precore gene, the HepAD38 cell line produces approximately 11 times more HBV DNA than HepG2.2.15 cells. In the HepAD38 cell line, tetracycline can be used to regulate HBV replication. When tetracycline is contained in the medium, HBV cannot be synthesized because of the inhibition of pgRNA synthesis. After removing tetracycline, the cells immediately express pgRNAs, cccDNA and HBV. Owing to the low sensitivity of direct cccDNA detection and the fact that the detection results are susceptible to interference by rcDNA signals, the HBeAg secreted by HepAD38 cells can be used as the main surrogate marker of cccDNA; therefore, the replication level of cccDNA can be estimated by detecting HBeAg directly. Compared to HepG2.2.15 cells, HepAD38 cells produce higher levels of HBV and can accurately regulate the commencement of viral replication. Similar to that of HepG2.2.15 cells, the limitation of the HepAD38 cell line is that it is not suitable for studying the interaction between virus and host cells in the early stage of HBV infection. This HBV cell culture system is suitable for studying HBV replication processes and anti-HBV drug screening. Guo et al. and Cai et al. optimized HepAD38 cells to generate HepDE19 and HepDES19 cells. HepDE19 cells perform all the functions of HepAD38 cells, but the dependency relationship between secreted HBeAg and cccDNA is closer than that in the HepAD38 cell line; thus, HBeAg is the only surrogate marker of cccDNA. While HepDES19 cells produce more cccDNA than HepDE19 cells, HepDES19 cells are more suitable for screening anti-HBV drugs and for observing the effects of drugs on cccDNA [9, 10]. In addition, Guo H and his colleagues established HepBHAe82 cells, which improved the detection of cccDNA marker [11]. Another derivative, Hep38.7-Tet cells, which have higher HBV replication and cccDNA levels than the abovementioned cell lines, has also been used [12].

Ad-HBV1.3 system

He et al. used adenovirus as a vector to introduce a 1.3-fold overlength HBV genome into the 293packaging cell line and then infected HepG2 cells with packaged recombinant virus (Ad-HBV1.3) to construct the Ad-HBV1.3-HepG2 system. This system can effectively initiate the replication of hepatitis DNA virus and express a high level of HBV. HBV protein, RNA, DNA and all replicative intermediates can be detected among the products. The presence of cccDNA indicates that intracellular hepadnavirus replication takes place in the native transcriptional template outside the chromosome; therefore, the replication cycle is independent of linear viral genomes, same as in natural infections [13]. The adenoviral vector can be used to adjust the level of HBV replication by altering the amount of recombinant viral DNA. Adenovirus-mediated HBV genomic transfer can help to study the ability of cells from different species to support HBV replication and the role of viral proteins in regulating the viral life cycle. Because of the integration of the green fluorescent protein (GFP) gene into the adenovirus cytoskeleton plasmid, the infection efficiency of the virus can be directly observed. After adenovirus genome transfer, the establishment of hepadnavirus cccDNA in heterologous cells will be helpful to investigate which step of the hepadnavirus replication cycle is supported by each cell and to analyze the cellular determinants [13]. Unlike the baculovirus system, in which gene transfer is limited to certain species [14], this system has no species barrier. Compared with the HepG2.2.15 cell line, this system has the advantages of highly expressing HBV and artificially controlling the mutation and expression of the HBV genome and can be used for in vivo experiments. In particular, of all known gene delivery vectors, adenovirus vectors are the most effective for transferring exogenous DNA to the livers of various experimental animals [15, 16]. The Ad HBV system has no species barrier, so it can achieve HBV replication in hepatocytes of its non-specific host. However, this system has significant cytotoxicity, which might restrict its application on certain questions, such as due to the failure of an increased vector dosage to increase antigen production, it is not suitable for assessing the antiviral effects of drugs.

HBV baculovirus system

Delaney et al. used baculovirus to introduce a replication competent HBV genome into HepG2 cells to establish the HBV recombinant baculovirus/HepG2 system [17]. The recombinant system can express various HBV antigens. High levels of HBV antigen, replicative intermediate, extracellular DNA, and cccDNA can be detected in this system [18]. In addition to secreted antigens, viral products such as HBV transcripts, replicative intermediates, and cccDNA were also present at levels proportional to the multiplicity of infection (MOI). HBV replication in the HBV recombinant baculovirus/HepG2 system can be maintained at high levels for at least 35 days with a dose-dependent expression level and virus infection. Compared with HepG2.2.15 cells, this cell line has an approximately 100 times higher HBV replication level. A unique aspect of the HBV recombinant baculovirus/HepG2 system is its ability to easily detect rcDNA and cccDNA; therefore, the system can be used to quantify the effects of antiviral agents on nuclear HBV DNA [19]. It can also be used to study the resistance of HBV to nucleoside analogs [17, 18]. However, the HBV recombinant baculovirus/HepG2 system also has flaws: (i) Baculovirus enters mammalian cells through nonspecific endosomal uptake rather than receptor-mediated mechanism [20]; (ii) baculovirus-mediated gene transfer is restricted to certain species; and most importantly, (iii) traditional baculovirus vectors are not suitable for use in animal experiments because they are rapidly inactivated by the complement system [14, 21].

Cell lines that can be infected with HBV

Human fetal hepatocytes

As the natural host of HBV, human embryonic hepatocytes have characteristics similar to those of adult hepatocytes; therefore, many researchers initially tried to establish and apply the human embryonic hepatocyte system. Ochiya et al. obtained large numbers of mononuclear polyhedral hepatocytes arranged in trabeculae from fetal liver tissue at 20-24 weeks of gestation. After cultured for approximately one week, glycogen, glucose-6-phosphatase and transpeptidase could be detected in the medium; on the second day after the cells were plated, albumin could be detected and continued to be secreted until the 16th day, retaining the regular morphologies and biochemical characteristics for at least 2 weeks of subsequent culture [22]. Viral replication indexes were detected both in the culture medium and intracellularly after using primary human fetal hepatocytes with HBV infection. It is clear that fetal human hepatocyte culture in vitro can simulate the biological function of hepatocytes in the human body, and the cells have enhanced survivability, proliferation and differentiation compared with human primary adult hepatocytes [22]. Its advantages as a replication system of HBV infection include the following: (i) the cells can be infected by serum containing HBV particles; (ii) all known viral proteins, RNAs and DNAs observed in HBV infected livers in vivo can also be produced in infected fetal human hepatocytes in vitro; (iii) the cells release infectious viral particles; (iv) the cells can produce cccDNA. However, this system also has limitations; its infection efficiency to HBV is only approximately 12%; moreover, after being attacked by the virus, the cells are no longer sensitive to HBV, and thus the spreading of virus to adjacent cells does not occur [22]. Productive infection of these cells can be maintained for only a limited period of time (up to 16-18 days), while maintaining a normal hepatocyte phenotype [23]. Lázaro et al. established the serum-free primary cultures of human fetal hepatocytes that can retain hepatocytic traits for 2-4 months [24]. Zhou et al. cocultured primary embryonic hepatocytes with nonparenchymal hepatocytes to induce hepatocyte islands, enhancing the differentiation ability of fetal hepatocytes. This resulted in the maintenance of liver function for up to 3 months and maintenance of susceptibility to HBV infection for 10 weeks under in vitro culture conditions [25]. However, the long-term culture of isolated human embryonic hepatocytes in vitro and the preservation of stable biological characteristics remain a problem. The ability of cells to differentiate is limited, and some hepatocyte functions are quickly lost. Importantly, the optimized model could still not overcome the rapid decrease in susceptibility to HBV under in vitro culture conditions. In addition, the limited availability of fetal hepatocytes and donor-dependent variations are major limitations of this system. This model is suitable for studying the early stage of HBV infection [22].

Adult human hepatocytes

The study of HBV-host cell interactions requires an appropriate and reproducible tissue culture system to reliably mimic the viral life cycle, and this need has prompted many researchers to focus on the establishment of in vitro systems by a variety of approaches. However, no effective cell culture system has thus far been developed to support this research. Cultures of primary human adult hepatocytes have the most similar physiological characteristics to hepatocytes in vivo, and thus it is an ideal model for studying HBV. High-yield and high-activity primary human hepatocytes were obtained by two-step perfusion using liver tissue surgically removed from a patient’s liver lobe. In vitro infection experiments confirmed that the cells could be naturally infected by HBV, thereby providing a better method for selecting the tissue source for primary human hepatocyte culture and establishing an HBV infection system [26]. Rijntjes et al. demonstrated that normal primary human hepatocytes can be cryopreserved for a long time. These cells can survive and maintain their typical cell phenotype for 3–4 weeks when inoculated onto an artificially prepared extracellular biological substrate after thawing [27]. Gripon et al. inoculated primary human adult hepatocytes with human serum containing HBV-infected particles, and the detection of HBV antigen and HBV DNA in the culture supernatant indicated that HBV could infect the primary adult hepatocytes [5]. Galle et al. reported that adult hepatocytes seeded on collagen gels after isolation could maintain cell viability for 4 to 6 weeks. Freshly isolated and plated adult hepatocytes were inoculated with human serum containing 1012 HBV-infected particles per liter (1:20 or 1:200 dilution). The results showed that high levels of HBsAg and low levels of HBeAg were secreted in the culture supernatant on the 6th day after infection, reaching maximum values on the 12th day and thereafter declining after 14 days, which indicated HBV replication [28]. Subsequently, Schulze-Berga et al. improved the culture method to prolong the growth time of primary adult hepatocytes in vitro, while maintaining their proliferation capacity and liver-specific functions [26].

Katsura et al. used keratinocyte growth factor (KGF) medium, adding 10% human serum, 10 mol/L nicotinamide (VPP), 10 μg/L endothelial cell growth factor (ECGF), 0.5 mg/L insulin, and 10-7 M dexamethasone as the basic culture medium for human primary hepatocytes, which prolonged their survival time to 56 days and simultaneously maintained their differentiation and function [29]. Gripon et al. reported that HBV infection was greatly enhanced when adult primary hepatocytes were coincubated with HBV in the presence of polyethylene glycol (PEG) [30]. Notably, Ishida et al. established a novel HBV infection system in vitro using fresh human hepatocytes isolated from the chimeric mice with humanized liver, which demonstrated susceptibility to HBV, and the maximum infection rate was approximately 80% in the presence of PEG. Besides, this system can support the complete HBV life cycle [31]. Ulvestad et al. simulated the microenvironment of the liver by allowing human hepatocyte cultures to be maintained for a long period and to retain numerous liver-specific functions by culturing human primary hepatocytes in a 3D bioreactor system [32]. These findings have laid the foundation for studying the pathogenesis of HBV and screening antiviral drugs using the primary hepatocyte model. However, although HBV infected adult primary hepatocytes similar to HBV natural infection, the cells could not be subcultured and the growth time was limited. Additionally, after plating, the function of mature hepatocytes declines rapidly and the cells lose their typical polygonal morphology, causing the gradual loss of sensitivity to viruses, which is the main obstacle to their application. This may be because hepatocytes cultured in vitro lose cell-cell communication between parenchymal and nonparenchymal cells in an in vivo environment, and their interaction is essential for regulating cell growth and differentiation and for coordinating the multiple functions of the liver [33,34,35]. Primary human hepatocytes have advantages that no tumor cell line can match, which include direct infection by HBV, close resembling the physiological and biological indicators of natural infection, making primary human hepatocytes the most reliable in vitro infection system.

However, primary hepatocytes are terminally differentiated cells that cannot be subcultured and have a limited life cycle. The rapid loss of the unique function and morphology of mature liver cells leads to the gradual loss of susceptibility to HBV. Although the problem of primary human hepatocyte source scarcity and the inability to scale up in previous years has limited the application of primary human hepatocytes in related fields, some laboratories have recently reported methods of primary human hepatocyte amplification in vitro to solve this problem. In the Yan He-Xin laboratory, the 2D culture method was used to induce human hepatocytes to dedifferentiate into liver stem cells that could be expanded in vitro, thereby reversing and expanding primary hepatocytes and leading to the development of a new cell source for HBV-host cell interaction studies [36]. Using the 2D culture method, Zhang et al. added Wnt3a and other factors to the culture medium to establish a new in vitro culture system for human hepatocytes, which increased the amplification of human primary hepatocytes in vitro by up to 10,000-fold [37]. Recently, the Roel Nusse laboratory at Stanford University and the Hans Clevers laboratory in the Netherlands successfully expanded human primary hepatocytes in vitro by inducing hepatocytes to form organoids in vitro [38, 39]. Although the various methods for culturing human primary hepatocytes have their own advantages and disadvantages, the establishment of these methods for the in vitro expansion of hepatocytes will certainly substantially promote the development of liver research, enabling many experiments that were previously impossible. Primary human hepatocytes are commercially available.

Compared with the traditional 2D monolayer cell culture, 3D cell culture has significant advantages. 3D cell-culture models exceed 2D culture systems by promoting higher levels of cell differentiation and tissue organization. 3D culture technology creates a three-dimensional micro-environment for liver cells, which can accurately reproduce the complex environment of liver cells in natural tissues in vitro, and achieve a high degree of simulation of the real ECM (extracellular matrix) of biological tissues in vitro. In recent years, various liver 3D models have been proposed, including 3D liver ball models, liver slice systems based on microfluidic technology, etc., and their culture methods and materials used are different.

PHH can be cultured as 3D spheroids, with diameters between 200 and 300 µm. Multiple methods for the generation of spheroids have been presented, including stirring bioreactors [40], aggregation in hanging drops, or culture on ultralow attachment (ULA) surfaces. 3D spherical cultured hepatocytes retained their RNA expression levels of various phase I (CYP1A2, CYP2C9, and CYP3A4) and phase II enzymes (GSTA1 and UGT2B7) [41]. Immunofluorescence microscopy of human hepatocyte spheroids confirmed the presence of the liver-specific markers, hepatocyte nuclear factor 4α, albumin, cytokeratin 18, and cytochrome P450 3A. In addition, hepatocyte spheroids can spontaneously assemble a functional bile canaliculi network after 3-4 weeks of culture [40]. PHH spheres retain the drug metabolism and metabolic characteristics of freshly isolated hepatocytes, which can be used for long‐term analyses of drug metabolism and liver function and moreover is suitable for investigating in vitro metabolism of very low clearance drugs as well as for studying time‐dependent inhibition of drug metabolism for relevant periods [42]. In addition to determining drug clearance, they are used for metabolite identification, enzyme inhibition, and enzyme induction studies [43,44,45].

As these models are static and closed, the concentration of metabolites will rise to non-physiological levels, and the compact structure of 3D cultured cells will cause hypoxia and nutrient transport problems.

The liver chip based on microfluidic technology can effectively solve these problems. Microfluidics is a technology that precisely controls and manipulates micro-scale fluids, especially sub-micron structures. It is also called Lab-on-a-Chip or microfluidic chip technology. The application of microfluidics in organs-on-chips enables the efficient transport and distribution of nutrients and other soluble cues throughout the viable 3D tissue constructs. The liver-chip based on microfluidic technology provides physiologically relevant conditions that can retain the in vivo-like phenotype and bioactivity of hepatocytes [46]. The Advantages of microfluidic cell culture systems include the presence of dynamic flow conditions and mechanical stimulations within their microchannels, mimicking what is observed in vivo [47]. Furthermore, microfluidic devices can provide chemical concentration gradients with high sensitivity and precision. These gradients are indispensable for regulating essential biological processes such as chemotaxis, cell migration and differentiation, immune responses, and wound healing.

Co-culture system

Although primary hepatocyte culture is the best model for studying HBV infection in vitro, in most studies, within a few days of being isolated, primary human hepatocytes undergo a rapid dedifferentiation process and viral infections are abortive due to the rapid loss of hepatic functions [28].

Zhou et al. established a feasible method to prevent this dedifferentiation by co-culturing human fetal hepatocytes with hepatic non-parenchymal cells to maintain the differentiation features of human fetal hepatocytes [25]. In this co-culture system, the bile canalicular structures could be observed and hepatocytic features could be further maintained for up to an additional 3 months. Morphological examination showed that the piled-up hepatocytes formed island-like aggregates, and the piled-up hepatocytes in the 'hepatic islands' were surrounded and invaded by non-parenchymal cells. There are a number of multiple cellular cavities formed by an orderly arrangement of albumin-positive hepatocytes in the culture, which were probably liver organoids. Both albumin and CK18, which are the markers of mature hepatocytes, were stably expressed in this co-culture system. CYP 3A4, a member of the cytochrome P450 mixed-function oxidase system, was also expressed at high levels throughout the culture period, indicating good maintenance of the drug-metabolizing ability in the cocultured hepatocytes. Infecting these cultures with HBV, the infected hepatocytes survived, and continued to secrete HBsAg and HBeAg up to 114 days post-seeding, and cccDNA was also observed in the cells infected with HBV. Most importantly, these human fetal hepatocytes still exhibited susceptibility to HBV infection after long-term maintenance, for as long as 10 weeks.

Winer et al. established SACC by plating PHHs with non-parenchymal stromal cells in collagen-coated tissue culture plates, utilizing reported protocols to promote advanced liver morphology, to enhance many liver specific functions in order to extend the culture periods [48, 49]. HBV infection in SACC PHH was highly reproducible and did not depend on particular lots of pooled hepatocyte donors or batches of cell culture-derived HBV inocula. HBsAg, HBeAg, cccDNA and pgRNA were detected in SACC-PHHs infected with HBV. Immunofluorescent visualization of HBcAg demonstrated that most of the hepatocytes in the culture were infected. The secretion of HBsAg sustained for more than 30 days postinfection without suppression of cell-intrinsic antiviral defenses. When HBV was used to infect SACC PHH prepared from hepatocytes of different donors, only minor differences in the quantity of cccDNA and pgRNA were observed, indicating that SACC-PHHs were robustly infected. Therefore, the platform could be scaled to a format amenable to high throughput screening (HTS)applications. Moreover, the SACC-PHH platform can be used to test the utility of various direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) and putative host-targeting antivirals (HTAs). The SACC-PHHs platform may have utility for assessing preclinically the efficacy of other entry inhibitors and possibly (vaccine-induced) neutralizing antibodies [50].

Primary Tupaia hepatocytes

Tree shrews are small nonchewing toothed animals similar to primates in terms of phylogeny. They are the only animals known to be infected with HBV other than chimpanzees. HBV can infect primary tree shrew hepatocytes. cccDNA and four kinds of mRNA can be detected in cultured hepatocytes, and secretion of HBsAg and HBeAg can be detected in the cell culture supernatant [51]. The early phase of HBV infection of tree shrew hepatocytes is very similar to that of human hepatocytes, in which the pre-S1 and S antigens are essential [52]. However, the infection efficiency of tree shrew liver cells by HBV is low. Studies have shown that human serum components can block HBV infection of tree shrew liver cells, while purified virus particles can significantly enhance the ability of the virus to bind and infect tree shrew hepatocytes. To eliminate the effect of human serum components on viral invasion, Yan et al. infected tree shrew hepatocytes with recombinant adenovirus vector containing the whole HBV genome, and the cultured primary tree shrew hepatocytes could support all processes of HBV replication. In addition to forming cccDNA and secreting HBsAg and HBeAg, the cells could also support the generation of complete virus particles. This system has some advantages over other cell culture systems:(i) primary Tupaia hepatocytes are more readily available and exhibit a more constant susceptibility to HBV than primary human hepatocytes; and (ii) the results of infecting primary Tupaia hepatocytes with HBV in vitro can be verified in vivo by infection of Tupaia with HBV. Tree shrew primary hepatocytes have been widely used to study HBV infection. In a study by Yan H et al., the original Tupaia hepatocytes were used as target cells for photosynthetic cross-linking experiments, and the synthetic pre-S1 peptide was the key to identifying NTCP as a receptor for HBV and HDV [53]. Li et al. established a microRNA database for primary tree threw hepatocytes and analyzed the miRNAs from the primary hepatocytes of tree threw after HBV infection [54].

HepaRG cells

In 2002, Gripon et al, researchers at the French National Institute of Medicine, isolated cells from the liver tumor tissues of female patients with HCV infection and secondary liver cancer. Initially, the cells obtained an undifferentiated morphology after several passages. Then, the authors induced the cells to differentiate into cells with the functional characteristics of mature hepatocytes and biliary cells by adding DMSO and hydrocortisone to the medium. Finally, through purification and screening, the cell line HepaRG was obtained [55]. HepaRG is a hepatic progenitor cell line with directed differentiation potential that has a morphology similar to that of mature hepatocytes and can express hepatocyte-specific proteins after induction. HepaRG cells have been confirmed to be infected with HBV and secrete HBV antigen particles as well as cccDNA. However, HepaRG cells are only partially sensitive to HBV. Schulze et al. analyzed the reason why HBV infection is dependent on the differentiation and polarization state of the cell. The formation of hepatocyte-like structures and the resulting transformation of membrane polarity render HepaRG cells susceptible to infection by allowing access to the basolateral localized HBV-specific receptor(s) [56]. This cell line can be used for transduction with adeno-associated virus (AAV) or lentiviruses and is also suitable for direct HBV serum infection similar to primary hepatocytes. HepaRG cells support the complete HBV life cycle, including the viral entry step, and are the best tool for HBV virology research and new drug screening [57]. When culturing these cells, DMSO was previously added to the medium to increase the infection rate of HBV [30]. However, despite improving the culture conditions, the efficiency of HepaRG infection with HBV was only approximately 10–15%. Moreover, as a cell culture system for studying HBV, the viral replication level in the HepaRG cell line is far less than that obtained with plasmid transfection. These issues have created bottlenecks for current in vitro infection experiments. Because this cell line can express various functionally normal detoxification enzymes, it has been widely used to study drug metabolism and toxicity [58, 59]. This cell line is also suitable for studying the mechanism of virus adsorption and entry into host cells under natural conditions.

In vitro systems based on induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cell-derived human hepatocytes

Due to the scarcity of human primary hepatocytes and difficulties with long-term culture, the metabolic function of these cells is rapidly lost in vitro in short-term culture, which limits the use of primary hepatocytes. However, hepatoma cell lines lack a variety of cellular pathways and are not susceptible to HBV infection, making such cell lines unusable for the study of HBV-host interaction mechanisms. Therefore, it is necessary to find a more suitable cell culture system for studying the life cycle of HBV and the mechanisms of interaction with the host. Some researchers have attempted to use pluripotent stem cells as a breakthrough to establish cell culture systems suitable for HBV research. In 2007, the Japanese scientist Shinya Yamanaka transferred retroviruses containing human Oct3/4, Sox2, Klf4, and c-Myc into adult human dermal fibroblasts and dedifferentiated the cells into pluripotent stem cells by reprogramming. Induced pluripotent stem cells are similar to embryonic stem cells and embryonic adult pluripotent stem cells (APSCs), have multidirectional differentiation potential and are capable of maintaining genetic stability and self-renewal in culture [60]. Likewise, Duncan et al. produced human iPS (hiPS) cells by transducing foreskin fibroblasts with lentiviruses expressing OCT3/4, SOX2, NANOG and LIN28 [61, 62]. By supplementing the medium with B27 and 100μg/L activin A (ACTA), human iPS cells could differentiate into terminal endoderm, and continuously adding 20 μg/L BMP4, 10 μg/L FGF and 20 μg/L hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) under O2/5% CO2 culture conditions could further induce their directional differentiation into hepatocytes. HLCs derived from iPS cells have a morphology and characteristics similar to those of hepatocytes differentiated from human embryonic stem cells and have various liver function manifestations, including glycogen accumulation, indocyanine green metabolism, lipid accumulation, urea synthesis, uptake of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) and albumin expression. Mamoru Watanabe et al. established an immature proliferating hepatocyte-like cell line (iPS-HPCs) and a differentiated hepatocyte-like cell line (iPS-Heps) using induced pluripotent stem cell-derived hepatocyte lines. These two cell lines can express NTCP and their respective hepatocyte markers [63]. Sakurai et al. reported that with the differentiation of human-induced pluripotent stem cells into HLCs, the expression levels of several genes involved in HBV infection gradually increased [64]. Xia et al. Optimized the culture conditions to enable iPSCs to differentiate into HLC in a shorter time (15d). After differentiation, the HLCs maintained their differentiated state and allowed HBV infection for more than 4 weeks. Besides, they found that HLCs expressed the viral receptor NTCP more stable than primary human hepatocytes and HLCs supported robust infections and some spread of HBV [65]. Hideki Taniguchi et al. reported that HBV-infected human-induced pluripotent stem cell -derived liver organoids(hiPSC-Los) could recreate the virus life cycle and virus-induced hepatic dysfunction, which provides a promising individualized infection system for the development of personalized hepatitis therapy [66]. Notably, susceptibility to HBV infection in HLCs was largely dependent on the silencing of the type I interferon response which was demonstrated using a JAK inhibitor after infection. Because the innate immune system in hepatocytes derived from human pluripotent stem cells is intact, a cell bank containing iPS cell lines with extensive genetic variation could help elucidate virus-host interactions during chronic HBV infection and assist with drug development for HBV infection. The authors also confirmed that the expression level of NTCP is an important factor affecting the efficiency of HBV infection in iPS-HPCs. The HBV receptor NTCP, known as one of the central factors induced during the late differentiation of HLCs, was expressed at significantly higher levels in iPS-Heps than in iPS-HPCs, which explained why the shift point for becoming HBV permissive corresponded with the time of the phenotypic switch from hepatoblast-like to HLCs. The authors established the iPS-HPC-NTCP cell line by overexpressing NTCP, and these cells were shown to proliferate infinitely and to have biological characteristics similar to those of normal hepatocytes. The cells can stably proliferate over a long time while retaining a natural immune response. Therefore, they can be used to evaluate the effect of host cell maturity on the infectivity and life cycle of HBV and the effect of specific gene functions on host-HBV interactions. In addition, IPS-HPC and iPS-HPC-NTCP can be used for drug screening and studying the interaction between viruses and hosts and future genetic modifications in host cells. The shortcomings of this cell line are complicated modeling process, strict cell culture conditions and high experimental technical requirements.

NTCP-overexpressing hepatoma cell lines

In general, the first steps in the viral infection of a host cell are binding to the surface receptors on the cell membrane and then entering the cell. Different viruses require their own receptors, and cells with the appropriate receptors can be effectively infected by viruses. Prior to the discovery of specific receptors, HBV was known to interact with cell surface heparan sulfate proteoglycan (HSPG) to mediate adsorption to susceptible cells, but this does not explain the biological mechanism that HBV specifically infects hepatocytes [67].

In 2012, Li et al. reported the discovery of NTCP, a specific receptor for HBV infection [53] (Fig. 1). The authors modified the peptide of the HBV binding receptor (Pre-S1, 2 to 48 amino acids) [68,69,70,71,72] as a probe to search for a protein that binds to the Pre-S1 peptide by using the near-zero distance cross-linking and affinity purification techniques, finally discovering NTCP. By using peptide competition, the authors verified that NTCP specifically bound to Pre-S1, and they then silenced the NTCP gene via molecular biological RNA interference, thereby reducing the infectivity of HBV and hepatitis D virus (HDV). All these findings demonstrate that NTCP is necessary for HBV and HDV infection (as shown in Fig. 1).The authors also discovered that HepaRG cells need to be differentiated by drugs for two weeks before being infected with HBV because of the increased levels of NTCP expressed by the cells after induction.

Fig. 1
figure1

Schematic diagram of HBV entry into HepG2-NTCP cell mediated by NTCP. HBV interacts with the heparan sulfate proteoglycan on the cell surface and binds to the specific receptor NTCP which were overexpressed on the HepG2-NTCP cell, and then enters it. For detailed information, see the text. HSPG: heparan sulfate proteoglycan; NTCP: Na+-taurocholate co-transporting polypeptide; cccDNA: covalently closed circular DNA.

NTCP is a Na+ concentration gradient-dependent transporter located on the basolateral membrane of hepatocytes and can extract cholic acid from the blood [73, 74]. The NTCP expression in HepG2 and Huh7 cell lines, which are insusceptible to HBV, is relatively low, and the transporter is mainly expressed in hepatocytes, which are susceptible to HBV [75]. Destruction of the epithelial barrier of HepaRG cells grants HBV access to the basolateral membrane and thus increases the incidence of HBV infection. Unlike other epithelial cells, the location of NTCP on the basement membrane in mature hepatocytes depends on the polarity of the cell rather than the orientation of the apical membrane, which at least partially explains the problem of rapidly decreased HBV susceptibility caused by decreased primary hepatocytes polarity in vitro [56]. Yan H et al and Yi-Ni et al. compared human and mouse NTCP nucleotides and found that the sequence difference in the NTCP amino acid residues 84–87 was key to the species specificity of HBV infection by constructing a human mouse NTCP gene chimerism model. Replacing amino acids 84-87 in the mouse NTCP with the corresponding human sequence rescued the susceptibility of mouse hepatocytes to human HBV, suggesting that the second extracellular loop in mouse and human NTCP may be a crucial host determinant [72, 76]. Researchers have reported that NTCP-binding agents, including cyclosporin A (CsA) and its derivatives, as well as bile acids, can inhibit HBV entry by interrupting the interaction between NTCP and HBV large surface proteins [72, 77, 78]. Ro41-5253 was found to reduce host susceptibility to HBV infection by modulating the expression level of NTCP. All of these findings indicate that the regulatory pathway of NTCP expression is one determinant of HBV infection susceptibility [79]. Yan et al. used a plasmid as a vector to introduce the NTCP gene into Huh7 and HepG2 cell lines that cannot be infected by HBV or HDV and established HepG2-hNTCP and Huh7-hNTCP cell culture systems. After expressing the NTCP protein, these cells became susceptible to HBV and HDV. After transfected with NTCP, cell lines were infected with HBV, HBeAg, HBsAg, replication intermediates and RNAs could be detected in the culture supernatant [53]. In addition, cell lines such as hNTCP-HepaRG, hNTCP-HepG2 and hNTCP-HEK293 were created by transfection with the hNTCP gene. The discovery of NTCP made it possible to establish an HBV/HCV coinfection cell culture system that simulates natural infections. Yan et al. have demonstrated that overexpressing NTCP in HCV-susceptible Huh7 cells supports HBV infection. Veriier et al. discovered that NTCP mediates not only HBV infection but also HCV infection [80]. Generally, cell culture systems with high expression of hNTCP have the advantage of infinite hepatoma cells proliferations. After the first infection with HBV, virus particles secreted by cell lines with high expression of NTCP can still infect other cells, indicating that these models can support the whole life cycle of the virus and can be used to study the complete mechanism of HBV infection, including early viral invasion. Currently, these models have been used in the large-scale screening of antiviral drugs targeting NTCP [81,82,83,84]. However, these models disadvantageously require a high viral inoculum. Notably, Choijilsuren et al. observed that the physiological concentration of heparin could enhance HBV infection in an NTCP-dependent manner, leading to the establishment of a PEG-free HepG2-NTCP-AS platform that mimics HBV natural infection in vivo more closely than other systems [85]. However, this kind of model does not readily allow numerous viruses to spread between cells, which indicates that NTCP is not the only factor affecting HBV infection of host cells, even if it is possible to increase the infectivity of the progeny viruses by screening susceptible clones and changing the culture conditions [86, 87]. There are also other essential factors that influence HBV infection and replication and may be impaired or even lost in NTCP-overexpressing hepatoma cell lines. Despite the flexibility and handle ability of hepatocellular carcinoma cells, they lack multiple cellular pathways, including innate immune responses such as those related to IFN-α, which are particularly important for eliminating HBV from host cells. This limits their use in the study of virus-host interaction mechanisms [88, 89]. Therefore, although the establishment of an NTCP overexpression hepatoma cell culture system has made great progress, a more stable and more physiologically relevant system is still needed to mimic the HBV infection process in vivo.

Conclusions

The in vitro HBV cell culture system is an important tool for screening anti-HBV drugs, studying the biological properties of HBV and investigating virus-host interactions. We summarized the advantages and shortcomings of all the cell culture systems (as shown in Table 1). Because of the host specificity and tissue specificity of HBV, the availability of a stable and reliable in vitro cell culture system for HBV research is a key factor affecting the study of the mechanism of HBV action. The existing HBV cell culture systems have played an important role in studying the pathogenesis of HBV infection, immune mechanisms, screening of anti-HBV drugs, etc. and have greatly promoted research on the biological characteristics, infection process, and pathogenesis of HBV as well as on the development of anti-HBV related drugs and vaccines.

Table 1. Summary of HBV in vitro hepatocyte culture models

Due to the presence of inhibitory factors in human serum, most HBV cell culture systems in vitro cannot be infected with HBV-positive serum. The HepG2.2.15 and HepAD38 cell lines can continuously secrete HBV particles because of the integration of the HBV genome. HepAD38 cells, in particular, secrete 11 times more virus than HepG2.2.15 cells and are often used as the source of virus for HBV infection in cell culture systems and widely used in related studies. HepG2.2.15 cells have been used in many laboratories to screen anti-HBV drugs. On the other hand, the discovery of the HBV receptor NTCP has promoted research on the mechanism of HBV infection. After overexpressing NTCP, some liver tumor cell lines that could not be infected with HBV became susceptible to HBV, and cell lines that could be infected by HBV, such as the HepaRG cell line, acquired increased susceptibility to HBV. However, cell culture systems that overexpress NTCP still do not result in high cell-to-cell spread and cannot simulate the natural processes of HBV infection. This observation also indirectly indicates that NTCP is not the only factor affecting HBV infection of the host, and tumor cell lines may not express the factors associated with HBV infection and replication. Comparatively, the most ideal model for studying the mechanism of HBV infection is human primary hepatocytes. However, their use is limited owing to the source scarcity and the inability to be cultured in vitro for a long period. In recent years, because of the rapid development of 3D culture technology, large-scale expansion of hepatocytes in vitro has become possible. A number of laboratories have reported a variety of 3D culture methods and the use of 3D culture technology to expand human primary hepatocytes in vitro. Although some of the reported 3D culture techniques have their own advantages and disadvantages, it is believed that in the near future, the further optimized culture system can lead to the achievement of large-scale human hepatocytes expansion in vitro and to the maintenance of mature hepatocyte function for a long period, thus providing an optimal model for the study of HBV infection. The advantages and disadvantages of various cell culture systems for HBV infection in vitro and their applications are shown in Table 1.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

Abbreviations

HBV:

Hepatitis B virus

cccDNA:

Covalently closed circular DNA

NTCP:

Na+-taurocholate co-transporting polypeptide

GFP:

Green fluorescent protein

MOI:

Multiplicity of infection

KGF:

Keratinocyte growth factor

VPP:

Nicotinamide

ECGF:

Endothelial cell growth factor

PEG:

Polyethylene glycol

DMSO:

Dimethyl sulfoxide

AAV:

Adeno-associated virus

IPS:

Induced pluripotent stem

hiPS:

Human iPS cells

ACTA:

Activin A

HGF:

Hepatocyte growth factor

HLC:

Hepatocyte-like cells

LDL:

Low density lipoprotein

iPS-HPCs:

Induced pluripotent stem cell-derived immature proliferating hepatic progenitor-like cell lines

iPS-Heps:

Induced pluripotent stem cell-derived differentiated hepatocyte-like cells

hiPSC-Los:

Human-induced pluripotent stem cell -derived liver organoids

HSPG:

Heparan sulfate proteoglycan

CsA:

Cyclosporin A

ECM:

Extracellular matrix

ULA:

Ultralow attachment

References

  1. 1.

    Asabe S, Wieland SF, Chattopadhyay PK, et al. The size of the viral inoculum contributes to the outcome of hepatitis B virus infection. J Virol. 2009;83(19):9652–62. https://doi.org/10.1128/jvi.00867-09].

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Cheng PN, Liu WC, Tsai HW, et al. Association of intrahepatic cccDNA reduction with the improvement of liver histology in chronic hepatitis B patients receiving oral antiviral agents. J Med Virol. 2011;83(4):602–7. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmv.22014.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Nassal M. HBV cccDNA: viral persistence reservoir and key obstacle for a cure of chronic hepatitis B. Gut. 2015;64(12):1972–84. https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2015-309809.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Zoulim F. New insight on hepatitis B virus persistence from the study of intrahepatic viral cccDNA. J Hepatol. 2005;42(3):302–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhep.2004.12.015.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Gripon P, Diot C, Theze N, et al. Hepatitis B virus infection of adult human hepatocytes cultured in the presence of dimethyl sulfoxide. J Virol. 1988;62(11):4136–43.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Sells MA, Chen ML, Acs G. Production of hepatitis B virus particles in Hep G2 cells transfected with cloned hepatitis B virus DNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1987;84(4):1005–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Sells MA, Zelent AZ, Shvartsman M, et al. Replicative intermediates of hepatitis B virus in HepG2 cells that produce infectious virions. J Virol. 1988;62(8):2836–44.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Ladner SK, Otto MJ, Barker CS, et al. Inducible expression of human hepatitis B virus (HBV) in stably transfected hepatoblastoma cells: a novel system for screening potential inhibitors of HBV replication. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1997;41(8):1715–20.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Guo H, Jiang D, Zhou T, et al. Characterization of the intracellular deproteinized relaxed circular DNA of hepatitis B virus: an intermediate of covalently closed circular DNA formation. J Virol. 2007;81(22):12472–84. https://doi.org/10.1128/jvi.01123-07.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Cai D, Mills C, Yu W, et al. Identification of disubstituted sulfonamide compounds as specific inhibitors of hepatitis B virus covalently closed circular DNA formation. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2012;56(8):4277–88. https://doi.org/10.1128/aac.00473-12.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Cai D, Wang X, Yan R, et al. Establishment of an inducible HBV stable cell line that expresses cccDNA-dependent epitope-tagged HBeAg for screening of cccDNA modulators. Antiviral Res. 2016;132:26–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.antiviral.2016.05.005.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Iwamoto M, Cai D, Sugiyama M, et al. Functional association of cellular microtubules with viral capsid assembly supports efficient hepatitis B virus replication. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):10620. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-11015-4.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Sprinzl MF, Oberwinkler H, Schaller H, et al. Transfer of hepatitis B virus genome by adenovirus vectors into cultured cells and mice: crossing the species barrier. J Virol. 2001;75(11):5108–18. https://doi.org/10.1128/jvi.75.11.5108-5118.2001.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Hofmann C, Sandig V, Jennings G, et al. Efficient gene transfer into human hepatocytes by baculovirus vectors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995;92(22):10099–103.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Bramson JL, Graham FL, Gauldie J. The use of adenoviral vectors for gene therapy and gene transfer in vivo. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 1995;6(5):590–5.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Li Q, Kay MA, Finegold M, et al. Assessment of recombinant adenoviral vectors for hepatic gene therapy. Hum Gene Ther. 1993;4(4):403–9. https://doi.org/10.1089/hum.1993.4.4-403.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Delaney WEt, Miller TG, Isom HC. Use of the hepatitis B virus recombinant baculovirus-HepG2 system to study the effects of (−)-beta-2',3'-dideoxy-3'-thiacytidine on replication of hepatitis B virus and accumulation of covalently closed circular DNA. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1999; 43(8): 2017–26

  18. 18.

    Delaney WET, Isom HC. Hepatitis B virus replication in human HepG2 cells mediated by hepatitis B virus recombinant baculovirus. Hepatology 1998; 28(4): 1134-46. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.510280432

  19. 19.

    Abdelhamed AM, Kelley CM, Miller TG, et al. Rebound of hepatitis B virus replication in HepG2 cells after cessation of antiviral treatment. J Virol. 2002;76(16):8148–60.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Boyce FM, Bucher NL. Baculovirus-mediated gene transfer into mammalian cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996;93(6):2348–52.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Hofmann C, Strauss M. Baculovirus-mediated gene transfer in the presence of human serum or blood facilitated by inhibition of the complement system. Gene Ther. 1998;5(4):531–6. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.gt.3300607.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Ochiya T, Tsurimoto T, Ueda K, et al. An in vitro system for infection with hepatitis B virus that uses primary human fetal hepatocytes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1989;86(6):1875–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Lin M, Chen Q, Yang LY, et al. Hepatitis B virus infection and replication in primarily cultured human fetal hepatocytes. World J Gastroenterol. 2007;13(7):1027–31. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v13.i7.1027.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Lázaro CA, Croager EJ, Mitchell C, et al. Establishment, characterization, and long-term maintenance of cultures of human fetal hepatocytes. Hepatology. 2003;38(5):1095–106. https://doi.org/10.1053/jhep.2003.50448.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Zhou M, Zhao F, Li J, et al. Long-term maintenance of human fetal hepatocytes and prolonged susceptibility to HBV infection by co-culture with non-parenchymal cells. J Virol Methods. 2014;195:185–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jviromet.2013.10.010.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Schulze-Bergkamen H, Untergasser A, Dax A, et al. Primary human hepatocytes: a valuable tool for investigation of apoptosis and hepatitis B virus infection. J Hepatol. 2003;38(6):736–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Rijntjes PJ, Moshage HJ, Van Gemert PJ, et al. Cryopreservation of adult human hepatocytes. The influence of deep freezing storage on the viability, cell seeding, survival, fine structures and albumin synthesis in primary cultures. J Hepatol 1986; 3(1): 7-18

  28. 28.

    Galle PR, Hagelstein J, Kommerell B, et al. In vitro experimental infection of primary human hepatocytes with hepatitis B virus. Gastroenterology. 1994;106(3):664–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-5085(94)90700-5.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Katsura N, Ikai I, Mitaka T, et al. Long-term culture of primary human hepatocytes with preservation of proliferative capacity and differentiated functions. J Surg Res. 2002;106(1):115–23.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Gripon P, Diot C, Guguen-Guillouzo C. Reproducible high level infection of cultured adult human hepatocytes by hepatitis B virus: effect of polyethylene glycol on adsorption and penetration. Virology. 1993;192(2):534–40. https://doi.org/10.1006/viro.1993.1069.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Ishida Y, Yamasaki C, Yanagi A, et al. Novel robust in vitro hepatitis B virus infection model using fresh human hepatocytes isolated from humanized mice. Am J Pathol. 2015;185(5):1275–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajpath.2015.01.028.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Ulvestad M, Darnell M, Molden E, et al. Evaluation of organic anion-transporting polypeptide 1B1 and CYP3A4 activities in primary human hepatocytes and HepaRG cells cultured in a dynamic three-dimensional bioreactor system. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2012;343(1):145–56. https://doi.org/10.1124/jpet.112.195750.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Bhatia SN, Balis UJ, Yarmush ML, et al. Effect of cell-cell interactions in preservation of cellular phenotype: cocultivation of hepatocytes and nonparenchymal cells. Faseb J. 1999;13(14):1883–900.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Malik R, Selden C, Hodgson H. The role of non-parenchymal cells in liver growth. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2002;13(6):425–31.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Kasuya J, Sudo R, Mitaka T, et al. Hepatic stellate cell-mediated three-dimensional hepatocyte and endothelial cell triculture model. Tissue Eng Part A. 2011;17(3–4):361–70. https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.TEA.2010.0033.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Fu GB, Huang WJ, Zeng M, et al. Expansion and differentiation of human hepatocyte-derived liver progenitor-like cells and their use for the study of hepatotropic pathogens. Cell Res. 2019;29(1):8–22. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41422-018-0103-x.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Zhang K, Zhang L, Liu W, et al. In vitro expansion of primary human hepatocytes with efficient liver repopulation capacity. Cell Stem Cell. 2018;23(6):806-819.e4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stem.2018.10.018.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Peng WC, Logan CY, Fish M, et al. Inflammatory cytokine TNFalpha promotes the long-term expansion of primary hepatocytes in 3D culture. Cell. 2018;175(6):1607–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2018.11.012.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Hu H, Gehart H, Artegiani B, et al. Long-term expansion of functional mouse and human hepatocytes as 3D organoids. Cell. 2018;175(6):1591–606. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2018.11.013.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Tostões RM, Leite SB, Serra M, et al. Human liver cell spheroids in extended perfusion bioreactor culture for repeated-dose drug testing. Hepatology. 2012;55(4):1227–36. https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.24760.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Lauschke VM, Shafagh RZ, Hendriks DFG, et al. 3D primary hepatocyte culture systems for analyses of liver diseases, drug metabolism, and toxicity: emerging culture paradigms and applications. Biotechnol J. 2019;14(7):e1800347. https://doi.org/10.1002/biot.201800347.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Vorrink SU, Ullah S, Schmidt S, et al. Endogenous and xenobiotic metabolic stability of primary human hepatocytes in long-term 3D spheroid cultures revealed by a combination of targeted and untargeted metabolomics. Faseb J. 2017;31(6):2696–708. https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.201601375R.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Sohlenius-Sternbeck AK, Jones C, Ferguson D, et al. Practical use of the regression offset approach for the prediction of in vivo intrinsic clearance from hepatocytes. Xenobiotica. 2012;42(9):841–53. https://doi.org/10.3109/00498254.2012.669080.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Wood FL, Houston JB, Hallifax D. Importance of the unstirred water layer and hepatocyte membrane integrity in vitro for quantification of intrinsic metabolic clearance. Drug Metab Dispos. 2018;46(3):268–78. https://doi.org/10.1124/dmd.117.078949.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Hutzler JM, Ring BJ, Anderson SR. Low-turnover drug molecules: a current challenge for drug metabolism scientists. Drug Metab Dispos. 2015;43(12):1917–28. https://doi.org/10.1124/dmd.115.066431.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Hegde M, Jindal R, Bhushan A, et al. Dynamic interplay of flow and collagen stabilizes primary hepatocytes culture in a microfluidic platform. Lab Chip. 2014;14(12):2033–9. https://doi.org/10.1039/c4lc00071d.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Fernandes R, Luo X, Tsao CY, et al. Biological nanofactories facilitate spatially selective capture and manipulation of quorum sensing bacteria in a bioMEMS device. Lab Chip. 2010;10(9):1128–34. https://doi.org/10.1039/b926846d.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Atienzar FA, Novik EI, Gerets HH, et al. Predictivity of dog co-culture model, primary human hepatocytes and HepG2 cells for the detection of hepatotoxic drugs in humans. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2014;275(1):44–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.taap.2013.11.022.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Bonn B, Svanberg P, Janefeldt A, et al. Determination of human hepatocyte intrinsic clearance for slowly metabolized compounds: comparison of a primary hepatocyte/stromal cell co-culture with plated primary hepatocytes and HepaRG. Drug Metab Dispos. 2016;44(4):527–33. https://doi.org/10.1124/dmd.115.067769.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Winer BY, Huang TS, Pludwinski E, et al. Long-term hepatitis B infection in a scalable hepatic co-culture system. Nat Commun. 2017;8(1):125. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-00200-8.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Walter E, Keist R, Niederost B, et al. Hepatitis B virus infection of tupaia hepatocytes in vitro and in vivo. Hepatology. 1996;24(1):1–5. https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.510240101.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Glebe D, Aliakbari M, Krass P, et al. Pre-s1 antigen-dependent infection of Tupaia hepatocyte cultures with human hepatitis B virus. J Virol. 2003;77(17):9511–21.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Yan H, Zhong G, Xu G, et al. Sodium taurocholate cotransporting polypeptide is a functional receptor for human hepatitis B and D virus. Elife. 2012;1:e00049. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.00049.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Xu G, Gao Z, He W, et al. microRNA expression in hepatitis B virus infected primary treeshrew hepatocytes and the independence of intracellular miR-122 level for de novo HBV infection in culture. Virology. 2014;448:247–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.virol.2013.10.016.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Gripon P, Rumin S, Urban S, et al. Infection of a human hepatoma cell line by hepatitis B virus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002;99(24):15655–60. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.232137699.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Schulze A, Mills K, Weiss TS, et al. Hepatocyte polarization is essential for the productive entry of the hepatitis B virus. Hepatology. 2012;55(2):373–83. https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.24707.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Gripon P, Cannie I, Urban S. Efficient inhibition of hepatitis B virus infection by acylated peptides derived from the large viral surface protein. J Virol. 2005;79(3):1613–22. https://doi.org/10.1128/jvi.79.3.1613-1622.2005.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Marion MJ, Hantz O, Durantel D. The HepaRG cell line: biological properties and relevance as a tool for cell biology, drug metabolism, and virology studies. Methods Mol Biol. 2010;640:261–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-60761-688-7_13.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Aninat C, Piton A, Glaise D, et al. Expression of cytochromes P450, conjugating enzymes and nuclear receptors in human hepatoma HepaRG cells. Drug Metab Dispos. 2006;34(1):75–83. https://doi.org/10.1124/dmd.105.006759.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Takahashi K, Tanabe K, Ohnuki M, et al. Induction of pluripotent stem cells from adult human fibroblasts by defined factors. Cell. 2007;131(5):861–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2007.11.019.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Yu J, Vodyanik MA, Smuga-Otto K, et al. Induced pluripotent stem cell lines derived from human somatic cells. Science. 2007;318(5858):1917–20. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1151526.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Si-Tayeb K, Noto FK, Nagaoka M, et al. Highly efficient generation of human hepatocyte-like cells from induced pluripotent stem cells. Hepatology. 2010;51(1):297–305. https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.23354.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Kaneko S, Kakinuma S, Asahina Y, et al. Human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived hepatic cell lines as a new model for host interaction with hepatitis B virus. Sci Rep. 2016;6:29358. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep29358.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Sakurai F, Mitani S, Yamamoto T, et al. Human induced-pluripotent stem cell-derived hepatocyte-like cells as an in vitro model of human hepatitis B virus infection. Sci Rep. 2017;7:45698. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep45698.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Xia Y, Carpentier A, Cheng X, et al. Human stem cell-derived hepatocytes as a model for hepatitis B virus infection, spreading and virus-host interactions. J Hepatol. 2017;66(3):494–503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhep.2016.10.009.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Nie YZ, Zheng YW, Miyakawa K, et al. Recapitulation of hepatitis B virus-host interactions in liver organoids from human induced pluripotent stem cells. EBioMedicine. 2018;35:114–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ebiom.2018.08.014.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Schulze A, Gripon P, Urban S. Hepatitis B virus infection initiates with a large surface protein-dependent binding to heparan sulfate proteoglycans. Hepatology. 2007;46(6):1759–68. https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.21896.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Barrera A, Guerra B, Notvall L, et al. Mapping of the hepatitis B virus pre-S1 domain involved in receptor recognition. J Virol. 2005;79(15):9786–98. https://doi.org/10.1128/jvi.79.15.9786-9798.2005.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Glebe D, Urban S, Knoop EV, et al. Mapping of the hepatitis B virus attachment site by use of infection-inhibiting preS1 lipopeptides and tupaia hepatocytes. Gastroenterology. 2005;129(1):234–45.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    Engelke M, Mills K, Seitz S, et al. Characterization of a hepatitis B and hepatitis delta virus receptor binding site. Hepatology. 2006;43(4):750–60. https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.21112.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. 71.

    Urban S, Gripon P. Inhibition of duck hepatitis B virus infection by a myristoylated pre-S peptide of the large viral surface protein. J Virol. 2002;76(4):1986–90.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  72. 72.

    Ni Y, Lempp FA, Mehrle S, et al. Hepatitis B and D viruses exploit sodium taurocholate co-transporting polypeptide for species-specific entry into hepatocytes. Gastroenterology. 2014;146(4):1070–83. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2013.12.024.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. 73.

    Stieger B, Hagenbuch B, Landmann L, et al. In situ localization of the hepatocytic Na+/Taurocholate cotransporting polypeptide in rat liver. Gastroenterology. 1994;107(6):1781–7.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  74. 74.

    Claro da Silva T, Polli JE, Swaan PW. The solute carrier family 10 (SLC10): beyond bile acid transport. Mol Aspects Med 2013; 34(2–3): 252-69. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mam.2012.07.004

  75. 75.

    Stieger B. The role of the sodium-taurocholate cotransporting polypeptide (NTCP) and of the bile salt export pump (BSEP) in physiology and pathophysiology of bile formation. Handb Exp Pharmacol 2011: 205–259 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14541-4_5

  76. 76.

    Yan H, Peng B, He W, et al. Molecular determinants of hepatitis B and D virus entry restriction in mouse sodium taurocholate cotransporting polypeptide. J Virol. 2013;87(14):7977–91. https://doi.org/10.1128/jvi.03540-12.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  77. 77.

    Watashi K, Sluder A, Daito T, et al. Cyclosporin A and its analogs inhibit hepatitis B virus entry into cultured hepatocytes through targeting a membrane transporter, sodium taurocholate cotransporting polypeptide (NTCP). Hepatology. 2014;59(5):1726–37. https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.26982.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  78. 78.

    Nkongolo S, Ni Y, Lempp FA, et al. Cyclosporin A inhibits hepatitis B and hepatitis D virus entry by cyclophilin-independent interference with the NTCP receptor. J Hepatol. 2014;60(4):723–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhep.2013.11.022.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. 79.

    Tsukuda S, Watashi K, Iwamoto M, et al. Dysregulation of retinoic acid receptor diminishes hepatocyte permissiveness to hepatitis B virus infection through modulation of sodium taurocholate cotransporting polypeptide (NTCP) expression. J Biol Chem. 2015;290(9):5673–84. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M114.602540.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. 80.

    Mutz P, Metz P, Lempp FA, et al. HBV bypasses the innate immune response and does not protect HCV from antiviral activity of interferon. Gastroenterology. 2018;154(6):1791-1804.e22. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2018.01.044.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. 81.

    Watashi K, Urban S, Li W, et al. NTCP and beyond: opening the door to unveil hepatitis B virus entry. Int J Mol Sci. 2014;15(2):2892–905. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms15022892.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  82. 82.

    Saso W, Tsukuda S, Ohashi H, et al. A new strategy to identify hepatitis B virus entry inhibitors by AlphaScreen technology targeting the envelope-receptor interaction. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2018;501(2):374–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2018.04.187.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. 83.

    Miyakawa K, Matsunaga S, Yamaoka Y, et al. Development of a cell-based assay to identify hepatitis B virus entry inhibitors targeting the sodium taurocholate cotransporting polypeptide. Oncotarget. 2018;9(34):23681–94. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.25348.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  84. 84.

    Kaneko M, Futamura Y, Tsukuda S, et al. Chemical array system, a platform to identify novel hepatitis B virus entry inhibitors targeting sodium taurocholate cotransporting polypeptide. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):2769. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-20987-w.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  85. 85.

    Choijilsuren G, Jhou RS, Chou SF, et al. Heparin at physiological concentration can enhance PEG-free in vitro infection with human hepatitis B virus. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):14461. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-14573-9.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  86. 86.

    König A, Yang J, Jo E, et al. Efficient long-term amplification of hepatitis B virus isolates after infection of slow proliferating HepG2-NTCP cells. J Hepatol. 2019;71(2):289–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhep.2019.04.010.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. 87.

    Michailidis E, Pabon J, Xiang K, et al. A robust cell culture system supporting the complete life cycle of hepatitis B virus. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):16616. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-16882-5.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  88. 88.

    Li K, Chen Z, Kato N, et al. Distinct poly(I-C) and virus-activated signaling pathways leading to interferon-beta production in hepatocytes. J Biol Chem. 2005;280(17):16739–47. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M414139200.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  89. 89.

    Tnani M, Bayard BA. Evidence for IRF-1-dependent gene expression deficiency in interferon unresponsive HepG2 cells. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1999;1451(1):59–72.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  90. 90.

    Li GQ, Xu WZ, Wang JX, et al. Combination of small interfering RNA and lamivudine on inhibition of human B virus replication in HepG2.2.15 cells. World J Gastroenterol 2007; 13(16): 2324–7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v13.i16.2324

  91. 91.

    Indrasetiawan P, Aoki-Utsubo C, Hanafi M, et al. Antiviral activity of cananga odorata against hepatitis B virus. Kobe J Med Sci. 2019;65(2):E71-e79.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  92. 92.

    Yang PL, Althage A, Chung J, et al. Hydrodynamic injection of viral DNA: a mouse model of acute hepatitis B virus infection. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002;99(21):13825–30. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.202398599.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  93. 93.

    Lucifora J, Vincent IE, Berthillon P, et al. Hepatitis B virus replication in primary macaque hepatocytes: crossing the species barrier toward a new small primate model. Hepatology. 2010;51(6):1954–60. https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.23602.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  94. 94.

    Wang F, Zhang X, Zhang J, et al. Effect of fibronectin on HBV infection in primary human fetal hepatocytes in vitro. Mol Med Rep. 2012;6(5):1145–9. https://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2012.1029.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  95. 95.

    Rose KA, Holman NS, Green AM, et al. Co-culture of hepatocytes and Kupffer Cells as an in vitro model of inflammation and drug-induced hepatotoxicity. J Pharm Sci. 2016;105(2):950–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-3549(15)00192-6.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  96. 96.

    Baumert TF, Yang C, Schürmann P, et al. Hepatitis B virus mutations associated with fulminant hepatitis induce apoptosis in primary Tupaia hepatocytes. Hepatology. 2005;41(2):247–56. https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.20553.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  97. 97.

    Shlomai A, Schwartz RE, Ramanan V, et al. Modeling host interactions with hepatitis B virus using primary and induced pluripotent stem cell-derived hepatocellular systems. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014;111(33):12193–8. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1412631111.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  98. 98.

    Gómez-Lechón MJ, Tolosa L. Human hepatocytes derived from pluripotent stem cells: a promising cell model for drug hepatotoxicity screening. Arch Toxicol. 2016;90(9):2049–61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00204-016-1756-1.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  99. 99.

    Iwamoto M, Watashi K, Tsukuda S, et al. Evaluation and identification of hepatitis B virus entry inhibitors using HepG2 cells overexpressing a membrane transporter NTCP. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2014;443(3):808–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2013.12.052.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We appreciated Dr. Wenyu Lin for supporting us HepG2-hNTCP cell lines.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81770591, No.81800778), the Chinese National Thirteenth Five Years Project in Science and Technology (2017ZX10202201), the Gilead Sciences Research Scholars Program in Liver Disease–Asia, the Key Medical Talents Fund of Jiangsu Province (ZDRCA2016007) and the Medical Innovation Team Project of Jiangsu Province (CXTDA2017023).

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

RX, PH, YL, JL and CZ designed the manuscript and analyzed the literature. RX, PH and CZ wrote the manuscript and prepared the table. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chuanlong Zhu.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that there are no competing interests regarding the publication of this paper.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xu, R., Hu, P., Li, Y. et al. Advances in HBV infection and replication systems in vitro. Virol J 18, 105 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12985-021-01580-6

Download citation

Keywords

  • Cell culture
  • HBV
  • NTCP
  • Virus-host interactions
  • 3D cell culture system