Skip to main content
Download PDF

A systematic literature review and meta-analysis of characterization of canine parvoviruses 2 prevalent in mainland China

Virology Journal volume 17, Article number: 195 (2020) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Canine parvovirus 2 (CPV-2) is a pathogenic virus that infects dogs, causing a highly infectious disease. Monitoring CPV-2 spread is an important part of prevention; however, the prevalence and epidemiological characteristics of CPV-2 have not been systematically evaluated and analyzed in mainland China. Therefore, a systematic review and meta-analysis were performed to assess prevalence and epidemiological characteristics of CPV-2 in domestic dogs in mainland China.

Methods

In this study, Chinese and English literature on CPV-2 epidemiology published between January 2006 and December 2019 was evaluated. Regarding meta-analysis, the random-effect model was employed by forest plot with 95% of confidence interval. The number of CPV-2 infections was identified and the pooled prevalence of infection, as well as the epidemiological characteristics, was calculated using meta-analysis.

Results

A total of 39 studies (data from 137,844 dogs) met the evaluation criteria and were used in our study. The pooled prevalence of CPV-2 infection in mainland China was 36%. CPV-2 infection were associated with age, breed, sampling season and immunization status, but not with gender, publication time and diagnostic methods.

Conclusions

Our results indicated that CPV-2 is prevalent among dogs in China. It is therefore necessary to carry out continuous surveillance and epidemiological studies of CPV-2. In addition, accordingly, effective measures should be taken to prevent the transmission and spread of CPV-2 among the Chinese dog population.

Background

Canine parvovirus 2 (CPV-2) is a linear, non-segmented, single-stranded DNA virus that belongs to the family Parvoviridae and causes a highly infectious disease [1]. The main clinical characteristics of CPV-2 infection are acute gastroenteritis symptoms, such as vomiting, fever, leucopoenia, and diarrhoea that affect dogs of different ages, especially for young puppies 6 months and younger [2]. CPV-2 infection is usually acquired through contact with infected dog faeces, vomit, saliva, and contaminated water or food. It was reported that the prevalence of CPV-2 was correlated with age, season, immune status and regional distribution [3]. In addition, the prevalence of CPV-2 also showed seasonal characteristics. Generally speaking, the infection is more serious in the spring, late autumn and early winter [4].

CPV-2 is a potentially fatal pathogen in domestic dogs and other canine species. It may also infect other animals, such as cats because it has evolved into variant types that can infect cats [5]. Studies have shown that CPV-2 is a variant of the feline parvovirus (FPV)-like virus that was found in faecal samples from dogs with diarrhoea and quickly spread around the world [6]. Subsequently, the CPV-2, which had previously been unable to infect cats, has been replaced by different but closely related antigen CPV-2 variants and is capable of infecting cats, suggesting that CPV-2 may have the ability to spread across species [7]. A transformation of animal virus into a zoonotic virus, either by mutation or by recombination, has been reported. Examples of host switching viruses include the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV) [8], Middle East respiratory coronavirus (MERS-CoV) [9], and some subtypes of influenza A virus (IAV) [10,11,12]. Therefore, the analysis of animal virus infection rates and epidemiological characteristics is necessary to reduce the risk of cross-species transmission between animals and humans and to prevent the potential threat of animal virus pandemic among humans.

CPV-2 was first reported in the USA in 1978 and has become prevalent worldwide, especially in China and other Asian countries [13, 14]. In 1978, there was a large outbreak of mixed infection of CPV-2 and canine coronavirus (CCoV) in dogs in the USA with high morbidity and mortality, attracting extensive global attention [15]. In China, the first record of CPV-2 was in 1982, and the infections were reported in widespread regions of China because of the high morbidity and mortality [16]. Since then, a number of studies on CPV-2 infection have been performed in China. Currently, CPV-2 infection has previously been reported in 23 provinces in China, and a long-term investigation has revealed that the rates of CPV-2 infection among Chinese domestic dog populations varied from 5.9 to 85.9% [17, 18]. These data provide a basic reference for our understanding of the epidemiological characteristics of CPV-2 in China. However, regional epidemiological studies are limited by sample size, sampling location, and season because China is a large country with a diverse climate. Therefore, the prevalence and risk factors of CPV-2 in China are not fully understood. Hence, this study focussed on a systematic review and meta-analysis to summarise the prevalence of CPV-2 and examine the potential risk factors of CPV-2 infection in mainland China.

Materials and methods

Search strategy

The study search was planned and performed according to the Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology guidelines [19]. To identify the epidemiological studies on CPV-2 in China, the literature published either in English or Chinese was searched up to December 2019. English databases (PubMed, Google Scholar, Cochrane library, and Clinical Trials) and Chinese databases (CNKI, Cqvip, WANFANG data, and Baidu scholar) were searched using “Canine parvovirus or CPV”, “epidemiology or incidence or prevalence”, “dog or canine”, and “China or Chinese”, or variants and combinations of these words, as keywords. Studies included in this systematic review had to contain any epidemiological data related to CPV-2 among dog populations from mainland China.

Exclusion criteria

The following studies were excluded from this systematic review and meta-analysis: (1) data from countries and regions outside mainland China; (2) literature that had review studies, case reports, press releases, newsletters, forums, and questionnaire surveys; (3) non-epidemiological studies (e.g., basic research); (4) no clear sampling time, sample size, infection rate, and prevalence rate in the study; and (5) insufficient information and duplicated findings.

Data extraction

The corresponding data were extracted from studies that met inclusion criteria and extracted into a Microsoft Excel datasheet. Recorded bibliographic data contained the following information: province, study design, background information, sample size, detection method, publication year, author, detection method, and sampling season.

Quality of publications

The selected publications were independently evaluated by two reviewers based on the established inclusion criteria. These publications were selected based on the information provided in the title and/or abstract as well as their full-text availability in Chinese or English. Furthermore, these publications had to contain prevalence data related to CPV-2 in mainland China. The quality of selected publications was assessed using the Newcastle–Ottawa scale (NOS). Studies with scores of 5 or above (out of 10) were included in the meta-analysis.

Statistical analysis

This study was planned and performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) [20]. In the eligible studies, a random effects model was utilised to calculate the pooled prevalence of CPV-2 infection among domestic dogs. Meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager 5.3 (Copenhagen: The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration, 2014). The pooled estimates were the outcome of the meta-analysis and visualised the heterogeneity among the included studies using Forest plots. Forest plots were used to summarise estimates with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The heterogeneity index among the included studies was determined using the Cochrane’s Q test (chi-squared) and Higgins I2 statistics. An I2 > 50% represents substantial heterogeneity [21]. Potential publication bias was assessed using a funnel plot. It was considered significant when the P value was less than 0.05.

Results

Description of studies

Based on search strategies of databases, a total of 5008 Chinese or English articles were identified. After the preliminary screen, 76 full-text articles were selected, and papers, duplicate citations, and studies not relevant to the current meta-analysis were removed. After excluding 37 articles with incomplete data, 39 articles met the inclusion criteria and were included in the systematic review (Fig. 1). The articles were published between 2006 and 2019, and covered 20 provinces in China. A cross-sectional study of all articles was performed, and period prevalence was calculated (Table 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Flow chart for screening eligible studies

Full size image
Table 1 Included studies of CPV-2 infection among dogs in mainland China
Full size table

Prevalence of CPV-2 infection in mainland China

A total of 137,844 domestic dogs and 27,464 CPV-2-positive cases were included in the meta-analysis. The total prevalence of CPV-2 in mainland China was 36% at 95% CI (0.31, 0.41), and demonstrated a strong heterogeneity (Chi2 = 29,260.2, I2 = 100%, P < 0.00001) (Fig. 2). Data from 39 studies were collected from 20 provinces, with the eastern and northern provinces being the majority. Among those provinces, the prevalence in Liaoning and Hunan provinces were higher than 70%, while that in most provinces of northern China reached above 30% (Fig. 3). The prevalence of CPV-2 in administrative districts of China (from highest to lowest) was as follows: 63% in Northeast China, 48% in Southwest China, 43% in North China, 38% in Central China, 29% in Northwest China, and 18% in East China. The prevalence of CPV-2 in Northeast China was higher than that in other administrative districts of China (Table 2).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Random-effects meta-analysis of CPV-2 infection in mainland China

Full size image
Fig. 3
figure 3

Map of CPV-2 infection in mainland China. Northeast China: Heilongjiang, Jilin, Liaoning; Northern China: Inner Mongolia, Shanxi, Hebei, Beijing, Tianjin; Northwest China: Xinjiang, Qinghai, Gansu, Ningxia, Shaanxi; Eastern China: Shandong, Anhui, Jiangxi, Jiangsu, Zhejiang, Shanghai, Fujian; Southern China: Guangxi, Guangdong, Shenzhen, Hainan, Macao, Hong Kong; Central China: Henan, Hunan, Hubei; Southwest China: Tibet, Yunnan, Guizhou, Sichuan, Chongqing

Full size image
Table 2 Infection of CPV-2 in dogs in mainland China
Full size table

Correlates of CPV-2 prevalence

As shown in Table 2, we analysed the risk factors related to the prevalence of CPV-2 infection in dogs. Among these risk factors, the occurrence of CPV-2 infection was significantly associated with age, sampling season, immunisation status, and breed: (1) the prevalence of infection in young dogs under 6 months of age was 68%, while that in dogs 6 months of age or above was 20%, which is a significant difference (P < 0.05); (2) the prevalence in unimmunised dogs (68%) was higher than that in immunised dogs (20%), and shows a significant difference (P < 0.05); (3) the prevalence of CPV-2 was the highest in spring (34%) and the lowest in summer (15%), which was significantly different (P < 0.05). The infection was more frequent in spring than in other seasons; (4) the prevalence of infection in purebred dogs was 66%, while in mutts it was 24% (P < 0.05), indicating that CPV-2 was more susceptible in purebred dogs than in mutts. However, the prevalence of CPV-2 in male dogs was 45%, and in female it was 38%; The prevalence based on the antigen Rapid CPV Ag Test kit was 43%, and based on the PCR it was 39%; The prevalence relying to publication year of included studies was as follows: Before 2016 35% and 2016 or later 40%. These results all shows no significant difference (P > 0.05), indicating that CPV-2 prevalence was less affected by gender, diagnostic methods and published time.

Discussion

To the best of our knowledge, the present study is the first meta-analysis investigating the prevalence of CPV-2 infection in domestic dogs in mainland China. In recent years, a large number of studies on CPV-2 have provided a deeper understanding of CPV-2 infection in Chinese domestic dogs. Statistics of the infection rates and epidemic characteristics of CPV-2 in the region are available through epidemiological studies; however, a large sample size is required to reduce the sampling error. This is because as the number of samples increases, the sample gets closer to the population. Furthermore, the climate in the north and south of China are different, which may have an impact on the prevalence of CPV-2. To understand the prevalence and epidemiological characteristics of CPV-2 in China, it is not possible to simply integrate the epidemiological data collected at different times and locations. Therefore, this study focussed on a systematic review and meta-analysis to summarise the prevalence of CPV-2 and examine the potential risk factors of CPV-2 infection in mainland China.

The estimates provided in our studies were based on data from 20 provinces in mainland China, and it demonstrated that the total prevalence of CPV-2 in mainland China was 36%. Statistics of subgroups showed that the prevalence of CPV-2 in northeast China was 63%, which was significantly higher than that in other administrative districts. Moreover, the highest rate (81%) of prevalence is observed in Liaoning province than in other provinces. The prevalence of CPV-2 varied from 15 to 81% in 20 provinces. Therefore, our study shows that CPV-2 is prevalent in Chinese dogs.

Although dogs of all ages can be infected with CPV-2, puppies are more susceptible, and become infected by CPV-2 show illness within 3–7 days, presenting with severe gastroenteritis, lethargy, vomiting, fever, and diarrhoea [57,58,59]. In this study, we observed that the prevalence of CPV-2 infection was significantly higher in puppies under 6 months of age, confirming that puppies were at a greater risk of contracting CPV-2 compared to adult dogs. This difference might be due to immature development of immune organs and lymphoid tissues, resulting in weakened body resistance in puppies [60]. Moreover, the prevalence of CPV-2 in purebred dogs was lower than that in hybrids in this study. These differences may be attributed to hybrids being able to adapt better to local climates and conditions, and developing more resistance to CPV-2 [37].

According to the current subgroup meta-analysis, the prevalence of CPV-2 was 34% in spring, which was higher than in other seasons. Spring is characterized by greater temperature differences between day and night, and if the dogs' immune system do not adapt to these temperature differences, that can decrease dogs’ immunity, which could be the reason for the seasonal variations in the prevalence of CPV-2 infection. In addition, the lower critical temperature for CPV-2 survival may also explain the seasonal variation in CPV-2 infection rates. Furthermore, several studies have reported that CPV-2 infection rates were higher in spring, which could be because people spend more time walking their dogs outdoors in the spring, thus increasing the chances of dogs being exposed to viral pathogens in the environment [17]. Therefore, these results showed that CPV-2 infection occurs throughout the year and is more prevalent in the spring. It is suggested that dogs be kept warm when the temperature between day and night varies greatly in spring. In addition, outdoor activity should be reduced to decrease the risk of CPV-2 infection.

Analyzing the subgroups, the prevalence of CPV-2 in unvaccinated dogs was significantly higher than those in vaccinated dogs. The reason for this is that dogs injected with vaccine can resist infection as they produce high levels of antibodies. However, interestingly, there was also prevalence (20%) in immunised dogs in this study. This could be attributed to improper immunisation procedures, improper preservation of vaccine, and inaccurate vaccination dose leading to immune failure. It could be because some Chinese dog owners prefer to get their dogs vaccinated at a kennel or pet shop rather than at an animal hospital. In addition, some dog owners are reluctant to cooperate with the hospital to have their dogs fully examined, which results in the immune effect not being detected effectively [29]. Therefore, enhancing the scientific awareness of dog owners, standardising immunisation procedures, and strengthening supervision over the transportation and preservation of vaccines are keys to improving immunisation efficiency.

The application of in-clinic immunochromatographic assays is available for the diagnosis of CPV infection in everyday veterinary practise, as the procedure is simple, inexpensive, and timely [61]. It only requires a faecal sample to permit diagnosis in vivo, which can assist in the early diagnosis of CPV. Meanwhile, PCR technology is also used for the investigation of CPV-2, as it is rapid, efficient, and highly accurate [62]. In the current study, the prevalence found in PCR was slightly lower than that found in in-clinic immunographic assays. This could be due to the high sensitivity and specificity of PCR to identify the species level and its acceptable genetic diversity. However, the difference in prevalence detected by the two diagnostic methods was not significant (P > 0.05), indicating that there is a fair agreement between in-clinic immunographic assay and PCR findings [63].

Our study had several limitations. First, one study identified during our systematic review did not have full text, leading to loss of qualified data. Second, the factors available for analyses were limited, with only publication date, geographical location, sampling season, gender, breed, diagnostic methods, and immunisation status retained. As a result, other potential risk factors were not analysed. Furthermore, the 39 included studies were cross-sectional studies. Therefore, more high-quality epidemiological studies on CPV-2 infection in Chinese domestic dogs should be carried out in the future to gain a more comprehensive understanding of the current situation of CPV-2 in China.

Conclusions

In conclusion, based on the results of this study, we found that the CPV-2 is prevalent in mainland China and even highly prevalent in some regions in China. In addition, the results illustrated correlation between CPV-2 prevalence and seasonality, a dog’s age/gender/breed/vaccination. Furthermore, the results suggest there is a need for continuous research on CPV-2 infection in more dogs to help other researchers to delve into the risk factors for CPV-2 infection, and indicate effective measures should be taken to reduce the prevalence according to the risk factors for CPV-2 infection.

Availability of data and materials

The data analyzed during the current study was available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

CPV-2:

Canine parvovirus 2

CCoV:

Canine coronavirus

SARS-CoV:

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus

MERS-CoV:

Middle East respiratory coronavirus

IAV:

Influenza A virus

MOOSE:

Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology

NOS:

Newcastle–Ottawa scale

PRISMA:

Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis

PCR:

Polymerase chain reaction

References

  1. Decaro N, Buonavoglia C. Canine parvovirus—a review of epidemiological and diagnostic aspects, with emphasis on type 2c. Vet Microbiol. 2012;155(1):1–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Zhong Z, Liang L, Zhao J, et al. First isolation of new canine parvovirus 2a from Tibetan mastiff and global analysis of the full-length VP2 gene of canine parvoviruses 2 in China. Int J Mol Sci. 2014;15(7):12166–87.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Cavalli A, Desario C, Kusi I, et al. Detection and genetic characterization of Canine parvovirus and Canine coronavirus strains circulating in district of Tirana in Albania. J Vet Diagn Invest. 2014;26(4):563–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Miranda C, Thompson G. Canine parvovirus: the worldwide occurrence of antigenic variants. J Gen Virol. 2016;97(9):2043–57.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bandai C, Ishiguro S, Masuya N, et al. Canine coronavirus infections in Japan: virological and epidemiological aspects. J Vet Med Sci. 1999;61(7):731–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Zhao Y, Lin Y, Zeng X, et al. Genotyping and pathobiologic characterization of canine parvovirus circulating in Nanjing. Chin Virol J. 2013;10:272.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Zhao H, Wang J, Jiang Y, et al. Typing of canine parvovirus strains circulating in North-East China. Transbound Emerg Dis. 2017;64(2):495–503.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Wang J, Lin P, Zhao H, et al. Continuing evolution of canine parvovirus in China: isolation of novel variants with an Ala5Gly mutation in the VP2 protein. Infect Genet Evol. 2016;38:73–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Truyen U, Parrish CR. Canine and feline host ranges of canine parvovirus and feline panleukopenia virus: distinct host cell tropisms of each virus in vitro and in vivo. J Virol. 1992;66(9):5399–408.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Bolles M, Donaldson E, Baric R. SARS-CoV and emergent coronaviruses: viral determinants of interspecies transmission. Curr Opin Virol. 2011;1(6):624–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Azhar EI, El-Kafrawy SA, Farraj SA, et al. Evidence for camel-to-human transmission of MERS coronavirus. N Engl J Med. 2014;370(26):2499–505.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Pawestri HA, Nugraha AA, Han AX, et al. Genetic and antigenic characterization of influenza A/H5N1 viruses isolated from patients in Indonesia, 2008–2015. Virus Genes. 2020;56(4):417–29.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Appel MJG, Scott FW, Carmichael LE. Isolation and immunisation studies of a canine parvo-like virus from dogs with haemorrhagic enteritis. Vet Rec. 1979;105:156–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Zhuang QY, Qiu Y, Pan ZH, et al. Genome sequence characterization of canine parvoviruses prevalent in the Sichuan province of China. Transbound Emerg Dis. 2019;66(2):897–907.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Tanner WD, Toth DJ, Gundlapalli AV. The pandemic potential of avian influenza A (H7N9) virus: a review. Epidemiol Infect. 2015;143(16):3359–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Yan HX, Xu HF, He WJ, et al. Phylogenetic analysis of HA and NA genes of influenza H1N1 viruses from 1918 to 2017. Acta Virol. 2019;63(2):195–202.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Zhao Z, Liu H, Ding K, et al. Occurrence of canine parvovirus in dogs from Henan province of China in 2009–2014. BMC Vet Res. 2016;12(1):138.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Zhao CG, Wang TK, Gu JF, et al. Epidemic characteristics of canine parvovirus disease in Changping District, Beijing. Anim Husb Vet Med. 2013;45(11):77–9 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Stroup DF, Berlin JA, Morton SC, et al. Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) group. JAMA. 2000;283(15):2008–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Shamseer L, Moher D, Clarke M, et al. Group, preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation. BMJ. 2015;350:g7647.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Higgins JP, Thompson SG. Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat Med. 2002;21:1539–58.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Wu J, Gao XT, Hou SH, et al. Molecular epidemiological and phylogenetic analyses of canine parvovirus in domestic dogs and cats in Beijing, 2010–2013. J Vet Med Sci. 2015;77(10):1305–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Li GK, Chen XX, Chen AX. Analysis on the prevalence of canine parvovirus in Liuzhou from 2004 to 2009. Guangxi Anim Sci Vet Med. 2010;26(4):203–4 (in Chinese).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Zhang J, Xia YH, Zhou HZ, et al. Investigation on the prevalence of dog disease in Beijing, China. Chin J Prev Vet Med. 2010;3:894–8 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Bai LH. The molecular epidemiological investigation of canine parvovirus infection in Beijing. Chin Acad Agric Sci. 2011. p. 15–6 (in Chinese).

  26. Zhang WW, Zhang ZX, Sun YZ, et al. Epidemiological features of Canine Parvovirus(CPV)in Beijing, China. Chin J Vet Med. 2016;52(3):82–4 (in Chinese).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Chen XR, Yang J, Zhang YH, et al. Molecular epidemiological investigation of canine parvovirus in Chengdu area. Chin Liv Pou Bre. 2019;09:3–5 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Fu Y. Etiological investigation of canine parvovirus and canine distemper virus in Changchun of Jilin Province. Univ Jilin Agric. 2017 (in Chinese).

  29. Zhang KM. Epidemiological Survey of Canine Common Viral Diarrhea in Jilin. Agr: China. Univ. of. Jilin; 2019 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Zhuo GR, Di HS, Lu W, et al. Investigation and treatment of canine parvovirus disease in Taizhou Jiangsu Province. Jiangsu Agric Sci. 2015;43(5):216–9.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Jing SY, Zhao QX, Song SB, et al. Investigation and analysis of canine parvovirus disease in Lanzhou city. Anim Husb Vet Med. 2018;37(2):60–5 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Zhang CX. Statistical analysis of clinical cases of dogs and cats in a pet hospital. Heilongjiang Anim Sci Vet Med. 2013;10:100–3 (in Chinese).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Lou HJ, Yan ZQ. Investigation on the prevalence of dog disease in nanjing, jiangsu province, China. Kennel Tech. 2010;2:12–4 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Tai D, Wei P, Wu WZ, et al. Clinical investigation of canine parvovirus disease in a pet hospital in Nanjing. Chin JVet Med. 2008;44(10):57 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Huang HX, Wang P, Liu LK, et al. Epidemiological investigation of canine parvovirus disease in Nanning. Guangxi Anim Sci Vet Med. 2018;34(2):76–9 (in Chinese).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Kang YL. Epidemiological investigation of canine parvovirus disease in Qingdao. Shandong Anim Sci Vet Med. 2016;37(3):40–1 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Yang JF. Research on the clinical characteristic of canine parvovirus disease. In: The 13th national symposium on veterinary surgery the 1st symposium on small animal medicine and the 3rd symposium on cow diseases. 2006; p 430–4 (in Chinese).

  38. Yang CL. Epidemiological investigation of canine parvovirus disease. Vet Tribune. 2012, p 82–3 (in Chinese).

  39. Geng ZX, Shi YS, Zheng YP, et al. Epidemiological investigation of canine parvovirus. Chin Anim Husb Vet Med. 2009;36(11):135–7 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Fu LJ, Pei XD, Wang XY, et al. Investigation and epidemic analysis of canine parvovirus disease. Chin Anim Husb Vet Med. 2012;39(5):225–7 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Yang QZ, Fu L. Analysis and analysis of the situation and flow of the disease in dogs. Modern Anim husb. 2014;06:62–3 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Zeng JH. Analysis of clinical condition and experiences of diagnose and treatement in canine parvovirus infection. Northwest A&F University. 2013 (in Chinese).

  43. Zhao N, Guo JN. Epidemiological investigation and treatment of canine parvovirus disease. Hubei Anim Sci Vet Med. 2013;34(3):10–3 (in Chinese).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Lin Y, Di QH, Fu HB, et al. Establishment and application of double PCR for canine parvovirus and canine coronavirus. Adv Anim Med. 2011;32(10):71–4 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Sun YZ, Dai YL, Ni XX, et al. Analysis on epidemic features of canine multi-pathogen infectious diseases in Qingdao City of Shandong Province. Chin Anim Insp. 2016;33(3):14–6 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Ju HB, Chen G, Niu GB, et al. Investigation of canine distemper and canine parvovirus infection in Shanghai. Chin J Anim Infect Dis. 2012;20(4):69–73 (in Chinese).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Chen HL. Investigation of common canine diseases in Shaoxing Zhejiang. Anim Sci Vet Med. 2012;04:40–1 (in Chinese).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Zan F, Bai HX, Cui J. Investigation and prevention control measures of common infectious diseases in canine in Tianjin area. Tianjin Agric Sci. 2017;24(4):90–3 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Luo HQ, Song XZ, Wang QY, et al. Epidemiological investigation of canine parvovirus disease in small animal hospital in Wenzhou area. Acta Agri Zhejiangensis. 2014;26(4):887–91 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Ma JP, Wang ZG. Epidemiological investigation and treatment of canine parvovirus disease in Ulanqab city. Heilongjiang Anim Sci Vet Med 2014; 06:137–138, 230 (in Chinese).

  51. Zhao WW. The prevalence and analysis of canine infectious diseases in Wuhan in recent years. Hunan Agric Univ. 2014 (in Chinese).

  52. Chen ZR, Chen JH, Li MJ, et al. Epidemic situation and prevention of canine parvovirus in Xichang. Guangdong Anim Husb Vet Sci Technol. 2016;41(2):39–42 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  53. Han GQ. Epidemiology investigation of canine distemper and canine parvovirus disease of korla of Xinjiang. Shihezi Univ. 2014 (in Chinese).

  54. Wu J, Liu Q, Hou Y, et al. Epidemiological investigations of canine parvoviral disease in Shihezi City of Xinjiang. Beijing Agric. 2011;05:80–2.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Ye Y. Investigation of canine pox fever, canine parvovirus disease and coronavirus disease in Changsha and study of therapeutic effects of traditional Chinese medicine. Hunan Agri Univ. 2016 (in Chinese).

  56. Wu HG, Wang XM, Liu JN, et al. Epidemic characteristics of canine parvovirus disease in Zhengzhou city. Anim Husb Vet Med. 2012;44(5):111–2 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  57. Carman PS, Povey RC. Pathogenesis of canine parvovirus-2 in dogs: haematology, serology and virus recovery. Res Vet Sci. 1985;38:134–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Nelson DT, Eustis SL, McAdaragh JP, et al. Lesions of spontaneous canine viral enteritis. Vet Pathol. 1979;16:680–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Parrish CR. Pathogenesis of feline panleukopenia virus and canine parvovirus. Baillieres Clin Haematol. 1995;8:57–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. Xu GM, Cao SF, Che YG, et al. Analysis of the incidence and treatment of 245 ceases of canine parvovirus disease. Anim Husb Vet Med. 2017;49:117–9.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Schmitz S, Coenen C, König M, Thiel HJ, Neiger R. Comparison of three rapid commercial Canine parvovirus antigen detection tests with electron microscopy and polymerase chain reaction. J Vet Diagn Invest. 2009;21(3):344–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Decaro N, Elia G, Martella V, et al. A real-time PCR assay for rapid detection and quantitation of canine parvovirus type 2 in the feces of dogs. Vet Microbiol. 2005;105(1):19–28.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Kantere MC, Athanasiou LV, Spyrou V, et al. Diagnostic performance of a rapid in-clinic test for the detection of Canine Parvovirus under different storage conditions and vaccination status. J Virol Methods. 2015;215–216:52–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

No applicable.

Funding

This study was supported by Special Fund for Local Science and Technology Development Guided by the Chinese Government (2018L3011), Fujian natural science foundation general project (2019J01804), Major projects of Key project of Fujian provincial youth natural fund (JZ160481) and Education and scientific research projects of young and middle-aged teachers in Fujian Province (JAT160483).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. College of Life Science of Longyan University, Longyan, 364012, China

    Bo Dong, Gaoqiang Zhang, Junyu Bai & Weiming Lin

  2. Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory for the Prevention and Control of Animal Infectious Diseases and Biotechnology, Longyan, 364012, China

    Bo Dong & Weiming Lin

  3. Longyan University Animal Hospital, Longyan, 364012, China

    Bo Dong & Weiming Lin

  4. Shenzhen An An Animal Hospital, Shenzhen, 518000, China

    Jiajia Zhang

Authors
  1. Bo Dong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Gaoqiang Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jiajia Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Junyu Bai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Weiming Lin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Bo Dong and Weiming Lin collected literatures, conceived the experiments and drafted the manuscript. Gaoqiang Zhang and Jiajia Zhang evaluated the literatures. Bo Dong and Junyu Bai extract data and performed the statistical analysis. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Bo Dong or Weiming Lin.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Consent for publication

No applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dong, B., Zhang, G., Zhang, J. et al. A systematic literature review and meta-analysis of characterization of canine parvoviruses 2 prevalent in mainland China. Virol J 17, 195 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12985-020-01462-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12985-020-01462-3

Keywords

  • CPV-2
  • Systematic review
  • Meta-analysis

Virology Journal

ISSN: 1743-422X