Open Access

First isolation and genetic characterization of pseudocowpox virus from cattle in Japan

Virology Journal201714:172

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12985-017-0840-3

Received: 28 June 2017

Accepted: 30 August 2017

Published: 6 September 2017

Abstract

Background

Pseudocowpox virus (PCPV) infects cattle worldwide with zoonotic potential but has not been isolated in Japan. Thus, the epidemiological status of PCPV infection in cattle is undetermined.

Results

In May 2016, a cattle in a farm in Yamaguchi Prefecture showed white vesicles and hyperemia in the mucosa under the tongue surface, but not on the teats and coronary cushions. A parapoxvirus was isolated from the oral lesion swab and was genetically characterized based on the full-length sequence of B2L gene encoding viral envelope. Phylogenetic analysis showed that the isolated virus was classified into PCPV.

Conclusion

This case indicates its potential spread in Japan. This is the first report of isolation of PCPV in Japan.

Keywords

Pseudocowpox virusCattleOral lesionsIsolation B2L gene

Background

Pseudocowpox virus (PCPV) is a member of the genus Parapoxvirus in the family Poxviridae, which includes bovine papular stomatitis virus (BPSV) and orf virus (ORFV) [1]. Parapoxviruses are commonly known as causative agents of dermal diseases in ruminants worldwide, leading to papular stomatitis and contagious pustular dermatitis, especially in the regions of the lips, nostrils, oral mucosa, and teats. The importance of PCPV is increasingly recognized, primarily because of economic losses to farmers in connection with disease outbreaks and because of their zoonotic potential [2].

In Japan, although serological surveys have revealed that seroprevalence of parapoxvirus is very high in cattle and sheep [3, 4] and multiple BPSVs have been isolated [5], no PCPV has yet been isolated; thus, the epidemiological status of PCPV infection in cattle is undetermined.

We here report the first case of the isolation of PCPV in Japan. We determined the full-length sequence of the B2L gene encoding viral envelope of this isolate, and evaluated its phylogenetic relation to known members of this virus group.

Methods

Clinical and epidemiological investigations

In May 2016, a breeding cow (Japanese Black, female, 13-month old) in a farm in Yamaguchi Prefecture, in the western part of Japan showed anorexia, mild fever, frothy salivation, and hyperemia in the mucosa under the tongue surface. No lesions were observed on the teats or coronary cushions. A few days after the onset of clinical signs, the cattle showed white vesicles on the tongue surface (Fig. 1). These signs were convalescent in about 1 week. No other cattle in the herd showed clinical signs.
Fig. 1

Clinical presentation of an affected cattle with white vesicles in the mucosa under the tongue surface

Sample collection

An oral swab sample was collected from the mucosal lesions of the affected cattle and was homogenized with Eagle’s minimum essential medium (MEM). The sample was centrifuged at 800×g for 10 min at 4 °C. The supernatant was filtered through a 450-nm membrane (Merck Millipore, Cork, Ireland) and used for virus isolation and DNA extraction.

Virus isolation

Virus isolation was performed through inoculation in primary bovine testis (BT) cells; two cell lines, hamster lung (HmLu-1) and Madin-Darby bovine kidney (MDBK) cells were also tested for comparison. The cells were grown in Eagle’s MEM with kanamycin (Nissui Pharmaceutical, Tokyo, Japan) supplemented with 0.295% tryptose phosphate broth (TPB), 0.015% sodium bicarbonate, 0.03% l-glutamine, and 5–10% fetal bovine serum at 37 °C. The cells were cultured in rolling tubes and 24-well plates, washed with maintenance medium (MEM containing 0.295% TPB, 0.015% sodium bicarbonate, 0.03% l-glutamine, and 0.1% bovine serum albumin), and inoculated with 0.1 ml of the processed samples. After adsorption for 60 min at 37 °C, the inocula were replaced with 0.5 ml of maintenance medium. The rolling tube-cultured and 24-well plates-cultured cells were incubated by rotary cultures and stationary cultures, respectively, and observed daily for cytopathic effects (CPE) for at least 7 days. Cultures without CPE were passaged twice in a blinded manner.

Genetic analysis

DNA was extracted both from the oral swab sample and from the BT cells showing a CPE using magLEAD 12gC (Precision System Science, Chiba, Japan). Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplifications were carried out with TaKaRa Ex Taq Hot Start Version (TaKaRa Bio, Shiga, Japan) using a SimpliAmp Thermal Cycler (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Kanagawa, Japan) for detection of the full-length (1137 bp) and partial-length (554 bp) B2L gene encoding envelope of parapoxvirus with the primer sets OVB2LF1/OVB2LR1 [6] and PPV1/PPV4 [5], respectively. PCR products were purified using NucleoSpin Gel and PCR Clean-up (Macherey-Nagel, Düren, Germany), and the nucleotide sequence was determined by direct sequencing using a BigDye Terminator Cycle Sequencing Kit v3.1 (Applied Biosystems, Austin, TX, U.S.A.). Sequence data were aligned using the ClustalW method [7]. Phylogenetic analysis was performed using MEGA 6 software [8]. Phylogenetic trees were constructed using maximum-likelihood methods, and the reliability of the branches was evaluated by bootstrapping with 1000 replicates. Nucleotide and deduced amino acid sequences were compared with those of available corresponding parapoxviruses (Table 1). Bovine viral diarrhea virus [9], epizootic hemorrhagic disease virus [10], bluetongue virus [10], ovine herpesvirus 2 [11], and bovine herpesvirus 1 [12], were not detected by PCR using specific primers for detection of each viruses (data not shown).
Table 1

Nucleotide and deduced amino acid sequence identities (%) of the full-length B2L gene

Virusa

Strain

Host

Nucleotide

Amino acid

Accession number

PCPV

YG2828

Cattle

LC230119

VR634

Cattle

98.6

99.2

GQ329670

TQ

Cattle

98.2

98.7

AY424972

F07.798R

Reindeer

98.4

98.9

JF773692

F07.801R

Reindeer

98.4

98.9

JF773693

F05.990C

Cattle

98.6

98.7

JF773694

F10.3081C

Cattle

98.6

98.7

JF773695

F00.120R

Reindeer

98.4

98.9

GQ329669

Arero/05/2013

Camel

97.2

97.6

KU645549

Arero/04/2013

Camel

97.0

97.1

KU645548

Arero/02/2014

Camel

97.2

97.6

KU645546

Hordha/01/2011

Camel

97.0

97.1

KU645563

ORFV

NZ2

Sheep

94.1

95.0

DQ184476

F07.808R

Reindeer

93.7

93.9

JF773698

SD/DY

Sheep

93.9

93.7

JQ904794

Adet/O03/2012

Sheep

94.0

95.0

KT438515

BPSV

RS

Cattle

85.8

84.4

AY424973

BV-TX09c1

Cattle

85.8

84.7

KM875472

BV-TX09c5

Cattle

85.8

84.7

KM875471

BV-AR02

Cattle

86.1

84.7

AY386265

aPCPV, pseudocowpox virus; ORFV, orf virus; BPSV, bovine papular stomatitis virus

Results

At the third passage, a distinct CPE was observed from 2 to 3 days after inoculation in the rolling tube-cultured BT cells, characterized by a rounded morphology and cell detachment (Fig. 2). We designated the isolate as strain YG2828. However, at the third passage, no CPE appeared in the other cell lines or in stationary cultures. For histological observations, confluent monolayers of BT cells in the chamber slide system were inoculated with the isolate. Twenty-four hours after inoculation, the BT cells were fixed with acetone and stained with hematoxylin-eosin, which revealed pyknosis, and eosinophilic and basophilic cytoplasmic inclusion bodies (data not shown).
Fig. 2

Cytopathic effect observed in BT cells at passage 3. The cells were tested at day 3 after inoculation. Non-infected control (a) and infected (b) cells are shown

Fragments of expected size were amplified by PCR using both primer sets. Neither deletions nor insertions in the nucleotide sequence of the YG2828 strain were found (Additional file 1: Figure S1). Based on the nucleotide/amino acid identities and phylogenetic analysis of the full-length B2L gene, the YG2828 strain was classified as PCPV (Fig. 3). The nucleotide identities against published parapoxviruses ranged from 85.8 to 98.6% (Table 1), and showed the highest identity (98.6%) to three PCPV strains: F05.990C and F10.3081C isolated from cattle in 2005 and 2010 in Finland, respectively, and VR634 isolated from a human in the USA in 1963 with “milker’s nodules” on the hands. The deduced amino acid identities ranged from 84.4 to 99.2%, and showed the highest identity (99.2%) to the VR634 strain (Table 1), even though these strains were isolated independently, chronologically, and geographically.
Fig. 3

Phylogenetic tree of parapoxviruses based on the deduced amino acid sequence of the full-length B2L gene (378 amino acids). The percentage bootstrap values calculated from 1000 replications are indicated above the internal nodes

Discussion

As noted above, seroprevalence of parapoxvirus is very high in cattle in Japan and multiple BPSVs have been isolated [5], but no PCPV has yet been isolated. In this study, a PCPV was firstly isolated in Japan by rotary cultures, but not stationary cultures. Similarly, Mavromoustakis et al. [13] reported that significantly (P < 0.01) less herpes simplex virus was produced in stationary than in rotary cultures. Although the procedures of rotary cultures are more burdensome than those of static cultures, we suggest that rolling of inoculated cultures should be conventionally applied in clinical virology laboratories to aid in the isolation of PCPV. In the affected cattle in this study, there was no evidence of infection on the teats and udder, which are the more common lesion sites of pseudocowpox infection. The classification of parapoxviruses was formerly based on the natural host range, clinical signs, and serology [14], however this does not always reflect the classification revealed by molecular analysis [5] as evidenced by the present study.

Previously, there has only been one report describing the PCR detection of PCPV DNA in Japan, in which PCPV DNA was detected from oral lesions in a calf in Iwate Prefecture, in the northern part of Japan, but virus isolation was unsuccessful [15]. Notably, the partial-length sequence of the B2L gene determined from the PCR product (accession no. AB921003) was identical to that of the present strain YG2828 (data not shown). Thus, our results confirmed that PCPV can be isolated from atypical sites besides the teats and udder, and suggest that YG2828-like PCPV may cause oral lesions in cattle. Moreover, since parapoxviruses cross-react antigenically and two similar strains infected cattle in different locations in separate years, YG2828-like PCPV might be spreading among the cattle population in Japan. It is known that cattle are frequently infected with parapoxvirus subclinically [15] and PCPV has zoonotic potential [2]. Therefore, we recommend to wear gloves for people with regular exposure to cattle mucosa.

Conclusion

A PCPV was firstly isolated in Japan from the oral lesion swab of cattle showing white vesicles and hyperemia in the mucosa under the tongue surface, but not on the teats and coronary cushions, by rotary cultures. Genetic characterization based on the full-length sequence of B2L gene revealed that the isolated virus was genetically close to strains isolated from cattle in the USA and Finland. PCPV is responsible for significant economic losses in the cattle production. Further virological and epidemiological studies to characterize this strain and the possibility of its spread in Japan are highly required.

Abbreviations

BPSV: 

Bovine papular stomatitis virus

BT: 

Bovine testis

CPE: 

Cytopathic effects

HmLu-1: 

Hamster lung

MDBK: 

Madin-Darby bovine kidney

MEM: 

Minimum essential medium

ORFV: 

Orf virus

PCPV: 

Pseudocowpox virus

PCR: 

Polymerase chain reaction

TPB: 

Tryptose phosphate broth

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge Ms. Kaori Shimizu for her assistance in preparation of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was partly supported by a Grant-in-Aid (No. 16H05027) for Scientific Research and by the Grant for Joint Research Program of the Research Center for Zoonosis Control, Hokkaido University, from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Japan.

Availability of data and materials

Sequence data obtained in this study is available in the GenBank (accession no. LC230119).

Authors’ contributions

AO and YI analyzed all data in the experiment and were major contributors in writing the manuscript. AO and AY performed virus isolation and PCR experiments from samples from the affected cattle. AO and YI performed the nucleotide/amino acid identities and phylogenetic analysis. HN performed the histological experiment. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval

This study was approved by the Gifu University Animal Care and Use Committee (Approval number 14094). Sampling of oral swab was performed with informed owner consent.

Consent for publication

Not applicable

Competing interests

All authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Yamaguchi Chubu Livestock Hygiene Service Center
(2)
Laboratory of Food and Environmental Hygiene, Cooperative Department of Veterinary Medicine, Gifu University
(3)
The United Graduate School of Veterinary Sciences, Gifu University
(4)
Education and Research Center for Food Animal Health, Gifu University (GeFAH)

References

  1. Knowles DP. (2011) Poxviridae. In: Maclachlan NJ, Dubovi FJ, editors. Fenner’s Veterinary virology. 4th ed. London: Academic Press; 2011. p. 151–65.Google Scholar
  2. Friederichs S, Krebs S, Blum H, Wolf E, Lang H, von Buttlar H, Büttner M. Comparative and retrospective molecular analysis of parapoxvirus (PPV) isolates. Virus Res. 2014;181:11–21.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Kuroda Y, Yoshida M, Shibahara T, Matsui T, Nakane T, Hara H, Inoshima Y, Sentsui H. An epidemic of parapoxvirus infection among cattle : isolation and antibody survey. J Vet Med Sci. 1999;61:749–53.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Sentsui H, Inoshima Y, Minami A, Yamamoto Y, Murakami K, Shimizu S. Survey on antibody against parapoxvirus among cattle in Japan. Microbiol Immunol. 2000;44:73–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Inoshima Y, Murakami K, Yokoyama T, Sentsui H. Genetic heterogeneity among parapoxviruses isolated from sheep, cattle and Japanese serows (Capricornis crispus). J Gen Virol. 2001;82:1215–20.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Hosamani M, Bhanuprakash V, Scagliarini A, Singh RK. Comparative sequence analysis of major envelope protein gene (B2L) of Indian orf viruses isolated from sheep and goats. Vet Microbiol. 2006;116:317–24.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Thompson JD, Higgins DG, Gibson TJ. CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res. 1994;22:4673–80.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Tamura K, Stecher G, Peterson D, Filipski A, Kumar S. MEGA6: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 6.0. Mol Biol Evol. 2013;30:2725–9.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Vilček Š, Herring AJ, Herring JA, Nettleton PF, Lowings JP, Paton DJ. Pestiviruses isolated from pigs, cattle and sheep can be allocated into at least three genogroups using polymerase chain reaction and restriction endonuclease analysis. Arch Virol. 1994;136:309–23.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Ohashi S, Yoshida K, Yanase T, Kato T, Tsuda T. Simultaneous detection of bovine arboviruses using single-tube multiplex reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction. J Virol Methods. 2004;120:79–85.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Baxter SIF, Pow I, Bridgen A, Reid HW. PCR detection of the sheep-associated agent of malignant catarrhal fever. Arch Virol. 1993;132:145–59.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Rocha MA, Barbosa EF, Guimarães SEF, Dias Neto E, Gouveia AMG. A high sensitivity-nested PCR assay for BHV-1 detection in semen of naturally infected bulls. Vet Microbiol. 1998;63:1–11.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Mavromoustakis CT, Witiak DT, Hughes JH. Effect of high-speed rolling on herpes simplex virus detection and replication. J Clin Microbiol. 1988;26:2328–31.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Robinson AJ, Lyttle DJ. Parapoxviruses : their biology and potential as recombinant vaccines. In: Binns M, Smith GL, editors. Recombinant Poxviruses. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 1992. p. 285–327.Google Scholar
  15. Yaegashi G, Sasaki I, Chiba S, Murakami K. Molecular analysis of parapoxvirus detected in eight calves in Japan. J Vet Med Sci. 2013;75:1399–403.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2017

Advertisement