- Open Access
Antiviral activity of micafungin against enterovirus 71
- Chonsaeng Kim†3,
- Hyunju Kang†1, 5,
- Dong-eun Kim†1, 5,
- Jae-Hyoung Song4,
- Miri Choi1,
- Mingu Kang1,
- Kyungjin Lee3,
- Hae Soo Kim3,
- Jin Soo Shin3,
- Hyejeong Jeong1,
- Sunhee Jung1,
- Sang-Bae Han5,
- Jong Heon Kim6,
- Hyun-Jeong Ko4,
- Chong-Kyo Lee3,
- Meehyein Kim3 and
- Sungchan Cho1, 2Email author
© The Author(s). 2016
- Received: 3 February 2016
- Accepted: 7 June 2016
- Published: 13 June 2016
Enterovirus 71 (EV71) is a major causative agent of hand-foot-mouth disease (HFMD) and also causes severe neurological complications, leading to fatality in young children. However, no effective therapy is currently available for the treatment of this infection.
We identified small-molecule inhibitors of EV71 from a screen of 968 Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved drugs, with which clinical application for EV71-associated diseases would be more feasible, using EV71 subgenomic replicon system. Primary hits were extensively evaluated for their antiviral activities in EV71-infected cells.
We identified micafungin, an echinocandin antifungal drug, as a novel inhibitor of EV71. Micafungin potently inhibits the proliferation of EV71 as well as the replication of EV71 replicon in cells with a low micromolar IC50 (~5 μM). The strong antiviral effect of micafungin on EV71 replicon and the result from time-of-addition experiment demonstrated a targeting of micafungin on virion-independent intracellular process(es) during EV71 infection. Moreover, an extensive analysis excluded the involvement of 2C and 3A proteins, IRES-dependent translation, and also that of polyprotein processing in the antiviral effect of micafungin.
Our research revealed a new indication of micafungin as an effective inhibitor of EV71, which is the first case reporting antiviral activity of micafungin, an antifungal drug.
- Enterovirus 71 (EV71)
- FDA-approved drug
- Antiviral drug
Enterovirus 71 (EV71) is one of the major etiological agent of hand-foot-mouth disease and also causes severe neurological symptoms, such as aseptic meningitis, encephalitis and acute flaccid paralysis, which can lead to even death [1–4]. Since its first discovery in 1969, EV71 outbreak has occurred frequently in the Asia-Pacific region and caused hundreds of annual deaths. Despite its enormous threat to public health, currently no effective vaccines or therapeutic drugs are yet available.
EV71 is a member of human enterovirus A (HEV-A) species under genus Enterovirus in the Picornaviridae family . EV71 is a small and non-enveloped virus with a positive-sense single-stranded RNA genome of 7500–8000 nucleotides that is composed of a long open reading frame (ORF) flanked by 5’ and 3’nontranslated regions (NTR) [2, 6]. First, virus particle attaches and enters into host cells via specific receptors, and then the viral RNA genome is released into the cytoplasm. The viral RNA is used as mRNA for the initiation of translation at the internal ribosomal entry site (IRES) in the 5’ NTR, producing a large polyprotein. The viral polyprotein is further cleaved into individual viral proteins (VP4, VP2, VP3, VP1, 2Apro, 2B, 3A, 3B, 3Cpro, and 3Dpol) by two viral proteases 2Apro and 3Cpro. Negative-sense RNA genomes are also generated mainly by the action of 3Dpol and serve as templates for the production of positive-sense RNA genomes . Amplified positive-sense RNA genomes are packaged by structural proteins (VP1, VP2, VP3, and VP4) to produce infectious viral particles and then released from the host cell.
Effective antiviral drugs for the treatment of various diseases associated with enteroviral infection have been enthusiastically explored. Currently, many synthetic compounds (Gemcitabine , Pleconaril [8, 9], CsA , BPROZ , GPP3-1 , LVLQTM , Enviroxime , rupintrivir , DTrip-22 , and aurintricarboxylic acid ) and natural products (lycorine , raoulic acid , chrysin , and ginsenosides [20, 21]) have been reported to have inhibitory activities against part of or broad range of enteroviruses. However, none of them has been demonstrated to be sufficiently effective at the clinical level. Undesirable side effects in vivo are another limiting factor for the therapeutic application of those compounds. Therefore, the development of new anti-enteroviral drug candidates are urgently required before the enteroviruses cause more severe health problems in human society. In this regard, we chose FDA-approved drugs with proven clinical safety, with which new clinical application for EV71-associated diseases would be more favorable, for screen of anti-EV71 chemicals.
Here, we identified micafungin as an effective inhibitor of EV71 from a screen of 968 FDA-approved drugs. Micafungin potently inhibited the proliferation of EV71 in LLC-MK2 Derivative cells and moderately inhibited that of Coxsackievirus B3 (CVB3) in HeLa cells. Moreover, micafungin showed a strong inhibitory effect on the replication of EV71 replicon in Vero cells, indicating its effect on intracellular process(es) that are independent of the virus particle. As for the mode of action, further analysis ruled out the involvement of some of intracellular process(es), such as polyprotein processing by 3Cpro, IRES-dependent translation, and 2C and 3A proteins, in the antiviral action of micafungin.
Cells, viruses, and chemicals
Vero, HeLa, 293 T, LLC-MK2 Derivative, and H1HeLa cells were used as described previously . EV71 (strain BrCr) (ATCC VR-1775), EV71 (strain H) (ATCC VR-1432) were purchased from ATCC, and EV71 (strain 1095) was kindly provided by Yorihiro Nishimura . Those were expanded in LLC-MK2 Derivative cells. CVB3 and Human rhinoviruses were used as previously described . FDA-approved drug library version 2 was purchased from Enzo life science for screen of antiviral compound. Micafungin (Selleckchem), and Rupintrivir (Santa Cruz) were purchased and dissolved in DMSO for further analysis.
Anti-flag and -β-actin monoclonal antibodies were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich. EV71 3C antibody (GTX630191) was purchased from GeneTex. Anti-dsRNA J2 mouse monoclonal antibody was purchased from English & Scientific Consulting Kft. Secondary antibodies conjugated to horseradish peroxidase or Alexa Fluor 488 were purchased from Thermo Fisher Scientific and Life Technologies, respectively.
Plasmids pRibFluc-EV71 wt and p53CB3-LUC, which contains the firefly luciferase gene in place of the P1 capsid coding region of EV71 and CVB3 viral genome, were generously provided by Frank J. M. van Kuppeveld (Utrecht University, Netherlands). Plasmids pRib-LUC-CB3/T7-wt [23–25] and pRib-LUC-CB3/T7-(2C-A224V, I227V, A229V or 3A-H57Y) mutant clones [25, 26], were also used. Ribomax large-scale RNA production system (Promega) was used for the synthesis of replicon RNAs . To perform a screen of 968 FDA-approved drugs (Selleckchem), Vero cells (3 × 105 cells/well) were transfected with 0.4 μg of the EV71 or CVB3 replicon RNAs using Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen), split into 96 well plates (2 × 104 cells/well), and simultaneously treated with 10 μM of chemicals in 1 % DMSO solution. Eight hours after treatment of EV71 and CVB3 replicons, cells were assayed for firefly luciferase activity using One-Glo Luciferase Assay System (Promega). CellTiter-Glo Luminescent Cell Viability Assays (Promega) was used for measuring cytotoxicity.
Antiviral activity assay
Antiviral activity of chemicals was tested as previously described . Mock-infected and DMSO (1 %)-treated cells were regarded as a 100 % survival and virus-infected and DMSO (1 %)-treated cells were regarded as a 0 % survival. The antiviral activity of compounds was calculated as the percentage of the control.
Cell toxicity assay
MTT assay or CellTiter-Glo Luminescent Cell Viability Assay Kit (Promega) was used for measuring cell toxicity as described previously . Cell toxicity was calculated as the percentage of the control.
Cells in 96-well plate were infected with EV71 (1 MOI) and treated with micafungin. At 20 h after infection, cells were fixed and permeabilized with a 3:1 mixture of ice-cold methanol-acetone. Infected cells were stained with anti-dsRNA antibody and anti-mouse secondary antibody conjugated with Alexa Fluor 488 and followed by counterstaining with 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) (Product # 62248, Thermo Scientific). Operetta system (Perkin Elmer) was used for capturing images. Viral infection was quantified using HARMONY software in Operetta system. The ratio of infection was calculated as the percentage of the control.
Western blotting and RT-PCR
Virus-infected samples were prepared as described in immunofluorescence microscopy section. Western blotting was performed as previously described . Twenty hours after infection, total cell lysates were harvested and analyzed using anti-3C and -β-actin antibodies. RT-PCR was performed as previously described . For RT-PCR of viral RNA, total cellular RNAs were purified using QIAGEN RNeasy Mini Kit according to manufacturer’s manual. Reverse transcription was performed with random hexamer and SuperScript III reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen). The region spanning from 3B to 3C of EV71 was amplified with primer csp120 (5’-TTGAACCTTAGTGGTAAGCCCAC-3’) and csp121 (5’-GTGATTGATCCCTTCTATGAG-3’) and Accupower PCR premix (Bioneer). The β-actin mRNAs were also analyzed as a loading control.
Micafungin (20 μM) and rupintrivir (4 μM) were added to LLC-MK2 Derivative cells at indicated time points before or after EV71 infection. At 20 h post-infection, cells were fixed and stained with anti-dsRNA antibody and AF488-conjugated anti-mouse secondary antibody. Nuclei were counterstained with DAPI. The quantification of viral infection was done as described in immunofluorescence microscopy section. Viral infection was calculated as the percentage of the control.
Dual luciferase reporter plasmids pR/EV71(strain BrCr)/F-PEST and pR/CVB3/F-PEST were exploited and IRES assay was performed as previously described .
3C protease assay
293 T cells were transfected with pcDNA3-flag-3CD  using X-tremeGENE DNA Transfection Reagent (Roche), maintained for 15 h, and treated with 10 μM of micafungin for another 9 h before being subjected to Western blotting with anti-flag antibody.
Screening of anti-EV71 compounds from FDA-approved drugs
Next, to examine whether primary hits inhibit the proliferation of intact EV71 in cells, EV71 (BrCr)-infected LLC-MK2 Derivative cells were treated with 2 and 10 μM concentrations of the 21 identified compounds for 96 h and then analyzed by MTT assay, which is prevalently used for quantitative measurement of cell viability. In this assay, EV71 infection causes a cytopathic effect (CPE) on the LLC-MK2 Derivative cells, reducing the cell viability by almost 100 %, and any compound with antiviral activity can cause a relative increase in the cell viability. Among 21 primary hits tested, the treatment with micafungin most highly increased the cell viability by more than 60 % compared with the DMSO-treated control (Fig. 1c). In the same condition, rupintrivir, a potent 3C inhibitor, showed strong antiviral activity as previously reported . Gemcitabine, recently identified as an anti-enteroviral compound , also showed a moderate anti-EV71 activity. Intriguingly, micafungin is a well-known antifungal drug and has never been reported to have any antiviral activity. Thus, we decided to further investigate its antiviral activity (Fig. 1d).
Micafungin potently inhibits the proliferation of EV71 in mammalian cells
To further confirm the antiviral activity of micafungin in EV71-infected cells, viral proteins and RNAs were analyzed. EV71-infected LLC-MK2 Derivative cells were treated with a broad range of concentrations of micafungin for 20 h, and then the total cell extracts and RNAs were prepared and analyzed by Western blot with anti-3C antibody and RT-PCR with primers corresponding to the 3B-3C regions, respectively. The amount of EV71 3C protein decreased by the treatment with micafungin in a dose-dependent manner and is hardly detected at 10 μM (Fig. 3c), which is similar to those observed in EV71-infected cells and replicon assays (EC50 = 2–10 μM). Similar antiviral effects were also shown in the viral RNA analysis. The amount of EV71 RNAs were dramatically reduced by the micafungin treatment with an estimated EC50 of ~5 μM (Fig. 3d).
Moreover, the strong antiviral activity of micafungin was further confirmed by another approach, in which EV71-infected LLC-MK2 Derivative cells were visualized by staining the dsRNA with an antibody conjugated with a fluorescent dye, and quantified by counting the stained cells. EV71-infected cells exhibited a strong fluorescent signal of the dsRNA and then gradually decreased by a dose-dependent treatment of micafungin, with an estimated IC50 of 10 μM (Fig. 3e and Additional file 5: Figure S5). Collectively, these results clearly demonstrated that micafungin is a strong inhibitor of EV71.
Micafungin has a moderate antiviral activity against other enteroviruses
In order to examine whether micafungin has an antiviral effect on a broad spectrum of enteroviruses, we tested other enteroviruses such as Coxsackievirus group B type 3 (CVB3) and human rhinovirus (HRV), which are also single-strand, positive-sense enteroviruses that are significantly affecting public health. CVB3, one of the most well-studied enteroviruses and a member of HEV-B, is one of the main causes of viral meningitis, myocarditis, and pancreatitis [29, 30]. HRV, the predominant cause of the common cold, also belongs to the genus Enterovirus along with EV71 and CVB3 . Micafungin had an antiviral effect in CVB3-infected HeLa cells, but its activity was much weaker than that observed in EV71-infected LLC-MK2 Derivative cells (compare Fig. 3a and Additional file 6: Figure S6A). Similarly, weak antiviral activities of micafungin were also shown in H1HeLa cells infected with three different types of HRV (HRV-14, HRV-21, and HRV-71) (Additional file 7: Figure S7).
Micafungin affects virion-independent intracellular processes during EV71 infection
Even though there has been an increasing demand for antiviral therapy to control EV71 infections, no effective antiviral drugs of EV71 are currently available. Most of anti-EV71 inhibitors are only at the preliminary stages of drug development . Moreover, even rapidly moving drug candidates such as rupintrivir (a potent 3Cpro inhibitor) and pleconaril (a coat protein binder) have been dropped from further clinical development because of concerns about viral resistance, side effects, or poor efficacy in patients . Thus, the development of new antiviral drugs against EV71 is urgently required before EV71 causes more severe health problems in human beings. To efficiently achieve this goal, we searched for new antiviral compounds against EV71 from the FDA-approved drugs, which would facilitate the clinical application of drug candidate for EV71-associated diseases. In the present study, we identified micafungin, a drug for antifungal therapy, as an anti-EV71 agent. Extensive analysis in various assay systems explicitly demonstrated that micafungin is a potent inhibitor of EV71, which is the first report about its antiviral activity.
Micafungin is an FDA-approved antifungal drug for the therapy of diseases associated with Candida infection mostly. It is a large lipopeptide molecules with a complex aromatic side chain , and is classified into echinocandin family which inhibits the synthesis of the cell wall by targeting β-1,3-D-glucan synthase of fungi . Even though fungi are eukaryotes like human beings, the cell wall is not shared by either mammalian cells or viruses . In this regard antiviral effect of micafungin does not seem to be related with inhibition of β-1,3-D-glucan synthase. Unfortunately, more biological activities of micafungin have not been defined yet, thus it is not easy to explain the precise mechanism of antiviral effect on EV71. Nevertheless, based on our extensive analysis we could speculate the possible mode of action that micafungin probably targets intracellular event during EV71 infection such as translation, polyprotein processing, replication, or other such processes rather than virion-dependent processes such as viral entry and assembly. In the following studies, the underlying mechanism of antiviral effect by micafungin will be further investigated through the identification of viral mutation(s) conferring viral resistance to the treatment with micafungin. Moreover, it will be worthy to test the possible antiviral activities of caspofungin and anidulafungin, which are also antifungal drugs in echinocandin family [33, 35–37].
In this study, we provide a new function of micafungin, the drug currently being used for antifungal therapy, as an effective antiviral inhibitor of life-threatening EV71. Further validation in virus-infected animal models remains to suggest micafungin as an anti-EV71 drug candidate. Given that micafungin has been recently reported to show some hepatotoxic side-effects in vivo, the effectiveness at a low dose will be required.
This research was supported by a grant of the Korea Health Technology R&D Project through the Korea Heath Industry Development Institute (KHIDI), funded by the ministry of Health & Welfare (HI14C2124), the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF-2015M3A9C7030128), Korea Research Institute of Chemical Technology (KK1603-C00), and the KRIBB Research Initiative Programs.
SC, CK and HK conceived the study. SC, CK and HK designed the experiments. CK, HK, DEK, JHS, KL, HSK, JSS, HJ, SJ, and MGK performed the experiments. SC, CK, JHK, SBH, HJK, CKL and MK analyzed the data. HJK, CKL and MHK provided the valuable materials. SC, DEK, CK and MC wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
- Chumakov M, Voroshilova M, Shindarov L, Lavrova I, Gracheva L, Koroleva G, Vasilenko S, Brodvarova I, Nikolova M, Gyurova S, et al. Enterovirus 71 isolated from cases of epidemic poliomyelitis-like disease in Bulgaria. Arch Virol. 1979;60:329–40.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- McMinn PC. An overview of the evolution of enterovirus 71 and its clinical and public health significance. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2002;26:91–107.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Song J, Yeo SG, Hong EH, Lee BR, Kim JW, Kim J, Jeong H, Kwon Y, Kim H, Lee S, et al. Antiviral Activity of Hederasaponin B from Hedera helix against Enterovirus 71 Subgenotypes C3 and C4a. Biomol Ther (Seoul). 2014;22:41–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wang SM, Lei HY, Huang KJ, Wu JM, Wang JR, Yu CK, Su IJ, Liu CC. Pathogenesis of enterovirus 71 brainstem encephalitis in pediatric patients: roles of cytokines and cellular immune activation in patients with pulmonary edema. J Infect Dis. 2003;188:564–70.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Oberste MS, Maher K, Kilpatrick DR, Pallansch MA. Molecular evolution of the human enteroviruses: correlation of serotype with VP1 sequence and application to picornavirus classification. J Virol. 1999;73:1941–8.PubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Wu KX, Ng MM, Chu JJ. Developments towards antiviral therapies against enterovirus 71. Drug Discov Today. 2010;15:1041–51.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kang H, Kim C, Kim DE, Song JH, Choi M, Choi K, Kang M, Lee K, Kim HS, Shin JS, et al. Synergistic antiviral activity of gemcitabine and ribavirin against enteroviruses. Antiviral Res. 2015;124:1–10.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Shang L, Xu M, Yin Z. Antiviral drug discovery for the treatment of enterovirus 71 infections. Antiviral Res. 2013;97:183–94.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zhang G, Zhou F, Gu B, Ding C, Feng D, Xie F, Wang J, Zhang C, Cao Q, Deng Y, et al. In vitro and in vivo evaluation of ribavirin and pleconaril antiviral activity against enterovirus 71 infection. Arch Virol. 2012;157:669–79.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Qing J, Wang Y, Sun Y, Huang J, Yan W, Wang J, Su D, Ni C, Li J, Rao Z, et al. Cyclophilin A associates with enterovirus-71 virus capsid and plays an essential role in viral infection as an uncoating regulator. PLoS Pathog. 2014;10:e1004422.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Shih SR, Tsai MC, Tseng SN, Won KF, Shia KS, Li WT, Chern JH, Chen GW, Lee CC, Lee YC, et al. Mutation in enterovirus 71 capsid protein VP1 confers resistance to the inhibitory effects of pyridyl imidazolidinone. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2004;48:3523–9.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- De Colibus L, Wang X, Spyrou JA, Kelly J, Ren J, Grimes J, Puerstinger G, Stonehouse N, Walter TS, Hu Z, et al. More-powerful virus inhibitors from structure-based analysis of HEV71 capsid-binding molecules. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2014;21:282–8.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Falah N, Montserret R, Lelogeais V, Schuffenecker I, Lina B, Cortay JC, Violot S. Blocking human enterovirus 71 replication by targeting viral 2A protease. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2012;67:2865–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Heinz BA, Vance LM. The antiviral compound enviroxime targets the 3A coding region of rhinovirus and poliovirus. J Virol. 1995;69:4189–97.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Dragovich PS, Prins TJ, Zhou R, Webber SE, Marakovits JT, Fuhrman SA, Patick AK, Matthews DA, Lee CA, Ford CE, et al. Structure-based design, synthesis, and biological evaluation of irreversible human rhinovirus 3C protease inhibitors. 4. Incorporation of P1 lactam moieties as L-glutamine replacements. J Med Chem. 1999;42:1213–24.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chen TC, Chang HY, Lin PF, Chern JH, Hsu JT, Chang CY, Shih SR. Novel antiviral agent DTriP-22 targets RNA-dependent RNA polymerase of enterovirus 71. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2009;53:2740–7.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Urbinati C, Chiodelli P, Rusnati M. Polyanionic drugs and viral oncogenesis: a novel approach to control infection, tumor-associated inflammation and angiogenesis. Molecules. 2008;13:2758–85.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Choi HJ, Lim CH, Song JH, Baek SH, Kwon DH. Antiviral activity of raoulic acid from Raoulia australis against Picornaviruses. Phytomedicine. 2009;16:35–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Liu J, Yang Y, Xu Y, Ma C, Qin C, Zhang L. Lycorine reduces mortality of human enterovirus 71-infected mice by inhibiting virus replication. Virol J. 2011;8:483.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Song JH, Choi HJ, Song HH, Hong EH, Lee BR, Oh SR, Choi K, Yeo SG, Lee YP, Cho S, Ko HJ . Antiviral activity of ginsenosides against coxsackievirus B3, enterovirus 71, and human rhinovirus 3. J Ginseng Res. 2014;38:173–9.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Fuzzati N. Analysis methods of ginsenosides. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci. 2004;812:119–33.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nishimura Y, Shimojima M, Tano Y, Miyamura T, Wakita T, Shimizu H. Human P-selectin glycoprotein ligand-1 is a functional receptor for enterovirus 71. Nat Med. 2009;15:794–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- van Kuppeveld FJ, Galama JM, Zoll J, Melchers WJ. Genetic analysis of a hydrophobic domain of coxsackie B3 virus protein 2B: a moderate degree of hydrophobicity is required for a cis-acting function in viral RNA synthesis. J Virol. 1995;69:7782–90.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- van Ooij MJ, Vogt DA, Paul A, Castro C, Kuijpers J, van Kuppeveld FJ, Cameron CE, Wimmer E, Andino R, Melchers WJ. Structural and functional characterization of the coxsackievirus B3 CRE(2C): role of CRE(2C) in negative- and positive-strand RNA synthesis. J Gen Virol. 2006;87:103–13.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wessels E, Notebaart RA, Duijsings D, Lanke K, Vergeer B, Melchers WJ, van Kuppeveld FJ. Structure-function analysis of the coxsackievirus protein 3A: identification of residues important for dimerization, viral rna replication, and transport inhibition. J Biol Chem. 2006;281:28232–43.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ulferts R, van der Linden L, Thibaut HJ, Lanke KH, Leyssen P, Coutard B, De Palma AM, Canard B, Neyts J, van Kuppeveld FJ. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor fluoxetine inhibits replication of human enteroviruses B and D by targeting viral protein 2C. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2013;57:1952–6.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Kim H, Choi K, Kang H, Lee SY, Chi SW, Lee MS, Song J, Im D, Choi Y, Cho S. Identification of a novel function of CX-4945 as a splicing regulator. PLoS One. 2014;9, e94978.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Kang H, Song J, Choi K, Kim H, Choi M, Lee SY, Kim C, Lee SJ, Song MJ, Kang H, et al. Efficient lytic induction of Kaposi's sarcoma-associated herpesvirus (KSHV) by the anthracyclines. Oncotarget. 2014;5:8515–27.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Sawyer MH. Enterovirus infections: diagnosis and treatment. Semin Pediatr Infect Dis. 2002;13:40–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Whitton JL, Cornell CT, Feuer R. Host and virus determinants of picornavirus pathogenesis and tropism. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2005;3:765–76.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- De Palma AM, Heggermont W, Lanke K, Coutard B, Bergmann M, Monforte AM, Canard B, De Clercq E, Chimirri A, Purstinger G, et al. The thiazolobenzimidazole TBZE-029 inhibits enterovirus replication by targeting a short region immediately downstream from motif C in the nonstructural protein 2C. J Virol. 2008;82:4720–30.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Patick AK. Rhinovirus chemotherapy. Antiviral Res. 2006;71:391–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Iwamoto T, Fujie A, Sakamoto K, Tsurumi Y, Shigematsu N, Yamashita M, Hashimoto S, Okuhara M, Kohsaka M. WF11899A, B and C, novel antifungal lipopeptides. I. Taxonomy, fermentation, isolation and physico-chemical properties. J Antibiot (Tokyo). 1994;47:1084–91.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Douglas CM. Fungal beta(1,3)-D-glucan synthesis. Med Mycol. 2001;39 Suppl 1:55–66.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Denning DW. Echinocandin antifungal drugs. Lancet. 2003;362:1142–51.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nyfeler R, Keller-Schierlein W. Metabolites of microorganisms. 143. Echinocandin B, a novel polypeptide-antibiotic from Aspergillus nidulans var. echinulatus: isolation and structural components. Helv Chim Acta. 1974;57:2459–77.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Masurekar PS, Fountoulakis JM, Hallada TC, Sosa MS, Kaplan L. Pneumocandins from Zalerion arboricola. II. Modification of product spectrum by mutation and medium manipulation. J Antibiot (Tokyo). 1992;45:1867–74.View ArticleGoogle Scholar