Open Access

Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus infection: virus-host cell interactions and implications on pathogenesis

Virology Journal201512:218

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12985-015-0446-6

Received: 5 October 2015

Accepted: 1 December 2015

Published: 22 December 2015

Abstract

Middle-East Respiratory Syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) was identified to cause severe respiratory infection in humans since 2012. The continuing MERS epidemic with a case-fatality of more than 30 % poses a major threat to public health worldwide. Currently, the pathogenesis of human MERS-CoV infection remains poorly understood. We reviewed experimental findings from human primary cells and ex vivo human lung tissues, as well as those from animal studies, so as to understand the pathogenesis and high case-fatality of MERS. Human respiratory epithelial cells are highly susceptible to MERS-CoV and can support productive viral replication. However, the induction of antiviral cytokines and proinflammatory cytokines/chemokines are substantially dampened in the infected epithelial cells, due to the antagonistic mechanisms evolved by the virus. MERS-CoV can readily infect and robustly replicate in human macrophages and dendritic cells, triggering the aberrant production of proinflammatory cytokines/chemokines. MERS-CoV can also effectively infect human primary T cells and induce massive apoptosis in these cells. Although data from clinical, in vitro and ex vivo studies suggested the potential for virus dissemination, extrapulmonary involvement in MERS patients has not been ascertained due to the lack of autopsy study. In MERS-CoV permissive animal models, although viral RNA can be detected from multiple organs of the affected animals, the brain of human DPP4-transgenic mouse was the only extrapulmonary organ from which the infectious virus can be recovered. More research findings on the pathogenesis of MERS and the tissue tropisms of MERS-CoV may help to improve the treatment and infection control of MERS. 

Background

General overview of MERS and MERS-CoV

In September 2012, a novel lineage C betacoronavirus was identified as the etiological agent to cause severe respiratory infection in humans in the Middle East [1]. The novel virus was formally named as Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) by the Coronavirus Study Group of International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses in 2013 [2]. As of 23 September 2015, MERS-CoV has caused 1570 infection cases and 555 deaths in over 20 countries worldwide, with a high case-fatality of more than 30 % [3]. The continuing MERS epidemic in the Middle East is believed to be related to the failure to control the zoonotic sources, most probably the dromedary camels, which results in ongoing camel-to-human transmission [49]. While all primary cases of MERS have been epidemiologically linked to the Middle East, numerous clusters in the community and healthcare settings have also been reported. The largest healthcare-associated outbreak occurred in the Republic of Korea in 2015, in which 186 cases including 36 deaths occurred after the index patient returned from the Middle East [10]. The high case-fatality rate of MERS and the capability of MERS-CoV to cause outbreaks in healthcare facilities pose significant threat to public health worldwide.

Unlike most other human-pathogenic coronaviruses, which mainly cause self-limiting upper respiratory tract infections, MERS-CoV is capable of causing severe disease with lower respiratory tract involvement and extrapulmonary manifestations [11, 12]. Patients with severe MERS often present with pneumonic symptoms including fever, cough and dyspnea, with some progressing to respiratory failure and acute respiratory distress syndrome [13, 14]. Extrapulmonary manifestations such as renal failure, hepatic dysfunction, and diarrhea are not uncommon [13, 15]. Additionally, deranged coagulation profile and hematological changes may also be observed in severe MERS [15]. The infectious virus could be recovered exclusively from patients’ respiratory tract, whilst viral RNA could be detected extrapulmonary specimens such as blood, urine and stool by nucleic acid amplification tests [16, 17]. These clinical and laboratory findings are suggestive of possibly disseminated viral infection.

MERS bears some resemblance to severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) in terms  of clinical manifestation. The etiological agent of SARS is a lineage B betacoronavirus, SARS coronavirus (SARS-CoV). In 2002–2003, SARS-CoV infected more than 8000 patients with a case-fatality rate of 9.6 %, affecting over 30 countries worldwide [1820]. However, unlike SARS, no autopsy study has been conducted in deceased MERS patients. Therefore, our understanding of the pathogenesis of MERS remains largely elusive. In this review, we summarize the current knowledge on MERS-CoV cellular tropisms and the virus-host interaction observed in in vitro human cells, ex vivo human tissues, and their implications on the pathogenesis of MERS. The relevant findings in MERS-CoV infected experimental animals are also reviewed, aiming to recapitulate the human MERS disease and to better the understanding of pathogenesis of human MERS-CoV infection.

Cellular tropism of MERS-CoV in respiratory system and innate immune response upon infection

The primary infection site of MERS is human respiratory tract. It was demonstrated that MERS-CoV could effectively infect and robustly replicate in the human airway epithelium [21, 22]. Ex vivo tissues from human respiratory tract were also examined for the cellular tropism of MERS-CoV [23, 24]. It was shown that MERS-CoV infected non-ciliated bronchial epithelial cells, bronchiolar epithelial cells, alveolar epithelial cells and endothelial cells of pulmonary vessels [23]. Additionally, upon MERS-CoV infection in ex vivo lung tissues, the uninfected cells underwent massive apoptosis with extensive caspase 3 activation, implicating that paracrine mechanism may contribute to the induction of apoptosis [23]. Another study in human ex vivo lung tissue echoed the discovery of MERS-CoV’s productive infection and replication, as well as the occurrence of infection-induced apoptosis in human lung tissue [24]. Moreover, it was shown that MERS-CoV infection in ex vivo lung tissues displayed the comparable extent and kinetics to the infection of highly pathogenic avian H5N1 influenza virus in lung tissues of the same donors, indicating the high infectivity of MERS-CoV in human respiratory epithelium [24]. However, in the latter study, MERS-CoV could also infect ciliated bronchial epithelial cells while these cells were not susceptible to the virus in the former study [23, 24]. Notably, the studies in human ex vivo airway tissues invariably revealed that pulmonary endothelial cells were highly susceptible to MERS-CoV [23, 24], suggesting that MERS-CoV infection in respiratory tract could potentially develop into a systematic or disseminated infection. Taken together, human respiratory epithelium is highly permissive to MERS-CoV. The effective infection results in robust viral propagation and massive induction of apoptosis. These studies provided pathological basis of the major pulmonary features of MERS i.e., pneumonia and acute lung injury.

As the first line of host defense, human epithelial cells are stimulated to produce antiviral and proinflammatory cytokines and chemokines to eliminate the invading pathogens. Based on the studies in human primary respiratory epithelial cells, respiratory epithelial cell lines and ex vivo human lung tissue, there has been a consensus recognition that the induction of antiviral interferons (i.e. type I and III IFNs) was basically dampened, although type I and type III IFNs treatment can effectively inhibit the MERS-CoV replication [2123]. Additionally, MERS-CoV infection failed to elicit strong proinflammatory cytokines response in human primary respiratory epithelial cells and ex vivo respiratory tissues [21, 23, 24]. The respiratory epithelial cell line Calu-3 cells were used to study the early and late phase of innate immune response after MERS-CoV infection. It was demonstrated that the proinflammatory cytokines/chemokines such as IL-1β, IL-8 and IL-6 exhibited a delayed but marked induction upon MERS-CoV infection [25]. Based on these observations, antagonistic mechanisms of MERS-CoV to attenuate innate immune response have been extensively sought. A number of MERS-CoV proteins, including the papain-like protease, membrane protein, and accessory proteins 4a, 4b and 5, have been identified to suppress the interferon production [2629]. Among them, MERS-CoV 4a was shown to suppress PACT-induced activation of RIG-I and MDA5 and circumvent the innate immune response [27]. Additionally, MERS-CoV papain-like protease exhibited the deubiquitinating and deISGylating activities and suppressed the innate immune response [29]. Collectively, MERS-CoV may have evolved multiple antagonistic mechanisms to dampen or attenuate the host defense, which contributed to the high pathogenicity in humans.

Consistent with the responsiveness of MERS-CoV to interferon treatment in vitro, combinational treatment of IFN-α2b and ribavirin reduced virus replication and improved clinical outcome in MERS-CoV infected rhesus macaques [30]. It was further demonstrated that IFN-β1b treatment showed a better outcome in the virus-inoculated common marmosets [31].

The human immune cells involved in MERS-CoV infection

While the cellular tropism of SARS-CoV in human respiratory tract resembles that of MERS-CoV [21, 22], a number of immune cells displayed distinct susceptibility to MERS-CoV and SARS-CoV.

Macrophages

The novel MERS-CoV has a broad tissue and cellular tropism including human monocytic cell line, THP-1 [32]. A subsequent study focused on human macrophages and demonstrated that MERS-CoV could efficiently infect and replicate in human monocyte-derived macrophages (MDMs) [33]. Notably, a 2–4-log increase in viral RNA was consistently detected in MERS-CoV infected MDMs derived from different donors within 48 h post infection. In addition, MERS-CoV significantly induced the expression of proinflammatory and chemotactic cytokines and chemokines, including IP-10/CXCL-10, MCP-1/CCL-2, MIP-1α/CCL-3, RANTES/CCL-5, IL-8, and IL-12, in the infected human macrophages [33]. In the meantime, MERS-CoV triggered the upregulation of MHC class I-, MHC class II-, and costimulation-related genes in MDMs. Furthermore, by utilizing ex vivo organ culture, the authors demonstrated that the alveolar macrophages in human lung tissues were susceptible to MERS-CoV [33].

The SARS-CoV can infect human macrophages. However, viral replication of SARS-CoV in human macrophages was abortive and no infectious virus particles were produced [3437]. Despite an abortive infection, the SARS-CoV infection in human macrophages induced the expression of a number of proinflammatory chemokines including IP-10/CXCL10 and MCP-1/CCL2. On the other hand, the induction of IFN-α and IFN-β, which are important antiviral cytokines and key components of innate immunity, was largely absent [35, 37].

Dendritic cells

Dendritic cells are essential sentinels of the immune system, which detect invading pathogens and bridge the innate immune system with the adaptive immune system. Infection of human monocyte-derived dendritic cells (mDCs) by MERS-CoV was productive as evidenced by the progressive increase in viral antigen expression, increase in viral RNA, and increase in virus titer in the culture media of the infected cells [38]. Intriguingly, in the same study, the authors reported that MERS-CoV induced no IFN-β and marginal IFN-α expression in infected dendritic cells. On the other hand, MERS-CoV triggered substantial expression of IFN-γ, IL-12, IP-10/CXCL-10 and RANTES/CCL-5, which was significantly higher than that of SARS-CoV-infected dendritic cells. In addition, the surface expression of MHC class II and costimulatory molecule was disturbed in MERS-CoV-infected dendritic cells, which might contribute to the immune dysregulation during MERS-CoV infection [38]. Recently, Scheuplein et al. reported the infection of plasmacytoid dendritic cells by MERS-CoV. Remarkably, the author concluded that although MERS-CoV infection in plasmacytoid dendritic cells was abortive, the infection induced the production of large amounts of type I and type III IFNs exclusively in these cells [39].

In the case of SARS-CoV, a number of studies demonstrated that human dendritic cells were susceptible to SARS-CoV but were unable to support viral replication [35, 36, 40]. Nonetheless, SARS-CoV infection led to the phenotypic and functional maturation of dendritic cells, with regard to MHC class II and costimulatory molecule expression, T cell-stimulatory capacity, and cytokine/chemokine production including TNF-α, MIP-1α/CCL-3, RANTES/CCL-5, IP-10/CXCL-10, and MCP-1/CCL-2 [35, 40]. Importantly, Zhao et al. demonstrated the potential role of dendritic cells in controlling the pathogenesis of SARS-CoV in a mouse study. In particular, the authors showed that severe outcome of SARS-CoV infection correlated with the slow kinetics of virus clearance and delayed activation of respiratory dendritic cells [41].

Collectively, in contrast to the inability to elicit the production of proinflammatory cytokines in human respiratory epithelial cells, MERS-CoV and SARS-CoV are able to stimulate the induction of proinflammatory cytokines/chemokines in human macrophages and dendritic cells. However, the question arises whether the triggered innate immune response is beneficial or detrimental in MERS-CoV and SARS-CoV infected patients since the host immune response may act as a two-edged sword at different stages of disease [42]. Therefore, further studies are warranted in experimental animals and patients to elucidate how the virus-host interaction in these immune cells affect the pathogenesis of human coronavirus infections.

T lymphocytes

Although lymphopenia is commonly observed in SARS and MERS patients, the exact cause of lymphopenia currently remains unknown. It has been postulated that SARS-CoV may directly infect T cells and lead to T cell depletion [43]. However, alternative models for lymphopenia upon SARS-CoV infection have also been proposed, including sequestration of lymphocytes within the inflamed tissues, cytokine-induced cell death, as well as suppression of hematopoietic progenitor cells in bone marrow or thymus [37]. As for the infection of MERS-CoV, a recent study demonstrated that the infection of human DPP4-transduced and T cell-deficient mice with MERS-CoV resulted in the persistence of MERS-CoV in the lungs while the virus was cleared in control mice and B cell-deficient mice. These findings hinted that T cells might play critical roles in controlling the pathogenesis of MERS-CoV [44]. Subsequently, a study published earlier this year directly addressed the issue of MERS-CoV infection in T cells. The authors demonstrated that T cells from human peripheral blood mononuclear cells, human lymphoid tissues, and the spleen of common marmosets were highly susceptible to MERS-CoV. Furthermore, MERS-CoV induced substantial apoptosis in the infected T cells that involved the activation of the intrinsic and extrinsic caspase-dependent apoptosis pathways [45]. The results suggested that the unusual capacity of MERS-CoV to infect T cells and induce apoptosis might contribute to the high pathogenicity of the virus.

The role of T cells in controlling the pathogenesis of SARS-CoV infection remains incompletely understood. In a mouse study, it was observed that depletion of CD4+ T cells resulted in enhanced interstitial pneumonitis and delayed clearance of SARS-CoV from the lung tissues, which was associated with reduced production of neutralizing antibody and cytokines as well as reduced pulmonary recruitment of lymphocytes [46].

Possible involvement of extrapulmonary organs upon MERS-CoV infection

MERS-CoV viral RNA could be detected in blood, urine and stool specimens of some MERS patients, suggesting that the virus dissemination may occur [17]. We and others have shown that endothelial cells of blood vessel in human ex vivo lung tissues were permissive to MERS-CoV [23, 33], which may provide the pathological basis of the potential virus dissemination. In addition, it has been demonstrated that MERS-CoV can infect human monocyte-derived dendritic cells and cause productive viral replication [38]. Human primary T cells are also readily susceptible to MERS-CoV [45]. Dendritic cells and T cells are migrating cells in the human body. Therefore, the MERS-CoV infected dendritic cells and T cells may allow the virus to disseminate systemically beyond the respiratory tract. Collectively, extrapulmonary organs and tissues are very likely to be involved in MERS-CoV infection in vivo. However, so far, no human autopsy study has been documented. To address the possible extrapulmonary involvement, we have to seek evidence from MERS-CoV infected experimental animals although none of these animals can fully recapitulate the human MERS disease.

MERS-CoV infection and pathogenesis in non-human primate model and small animal models

The receptor for MERS-CoV was identified to be an exopeptidase, dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP4) [47]. The role of DPP4 as the main determinant in the host tropism of MERS-CoV has been elucidated in several studies [4850]. Commonly used laboratory animal species such as Syrian hamster, mice and ferrets are not susceptible to MERS-CoV since DPP4 orthologs of these animal species are unable to bind MERS-CoV spike protein and mediate virus entry [49, 51, 52]. The MERS-CoV inoculation in rabbits displayed an asymptomatic infection. Neither significant histopathological change nor clinical symptom was observed in these rabbits although the virus could be detected from lung tissues [53]. Camels are susceptible to the MERS-CoV isolated from human. Although the infected camels can shed large amounts of virus from the upper respiratory tract, the disease signs were mild [54]. Among all experimental animals tested for the development of MERS animal models, rhesus macaques developed a mild to moderate respiratory infection [55, 56] whereas common marmosets displayed a moderate to severe respiratory disease after inoculation using a combination routes of intranasal, intra-tracheal, oral and ocular [57]. In marmosets, the MERS-CoV infection was suggested to be a disseminated infection since viral RNA was detectable in nearly all tested tissues in all infected animals, including blood, kidney, intestine, liver and spleen etc. However, except for the samples from the respiratory tract, isolation of infectious virus in other organs was not successful. Interestingly, the susceptibility of macrophages to MERS-CoV as evidenced in the in vitro and ex vivo studies was verified in alveolar macrophages of MERS-CoV infected marmoset [57].

The first MERS mouse model was generated by prior transduction of adenoviral vector expressing human DPP4 (hDPP4). These mice displayed a transient viral pneumonia which resolved within 1–2 weeks after infection [44]. Several lines of human DPP4 transgenic mice have been subsequently reported. MERS-CoV infection and replication were invariably evidenced in these hDPP4 transgenic mice [5860]. However, disease sign and pathology in these mice differed, which appeared to depend on the promoters controlling the expression of hDPP4 gene. Pascal et al. replaced the mouse DPP4 ORF with human DPP4 so that the knocked-in hDPP4 is under the control of the endogenous mouse DPP4 promoter [60]. The authors believed that this strategy may render hDPP4 to be expressed in a physiologically-relevant context. After virus inoculation in these mice, MERS-CoV robustly replicated in the mouse lung. However, the inoculated mice did not exhibit disease signs, without any extrapulmonary involvement. On the other hand, two lines of hDPP4 transgenic mice which had the transgene under the control of chicken β-actin promoter [58] and cytokeratin 18 promoter [59] respectively, were highly permissive to MERS-CoV infection. The mice developed progressive pneumonia with fatal outcome after intranasal inoculation. The infectious virus can constantly and exclusively be recovered from lung and brain tissues [58, 59]. Similar to the marmoset study, while viral RNA can also be detected from extrapulmonary organs including the heart, spleen and intestines, virus isolation from these organs was unsuccessful. The hDPP4 transgenic mouse with cytokeratin 18 (CK18) promoter was generated in parallel with another transgenic mouse line with surfactant protein C (SPC) promoter. SPC promoter confers transgene expression in bronchiolar and alveolar epithelia while CK18 promoter can drive a more universal transgene expression in epithelia of liver, kidney, gastrointestinal tract and some cells in the nervous system, apart from respiratory tract. The hDPP4 mice with CK18 promoter developed lethal infection after intranasal inoculation of MERS-CoV. In contrast, the same inoculation in the hDPP4 mice with SPC promoter caused no mortality or body weight loss [59]. Therefore, the morbidity and mortality in human DPP4 transgenic mice may correlate to the tissue/cellular distribution and/or the expression intensity of the transgene. Notably, a common discovery among these MERS-CoV susceptible animals was that the gene expression of antiviral cytokines, proinflammatory cytokines and chemokines was elevated [55, 57, 58]. Collectively, the tissue tropisms of MERS-CoV in human hosts have not been fully elucidated although there has been accumulating evidence of possible extrapulmonary involvement in MERS patients. Undoubtedly, hDPP4 transgenic mouse studies are conducive for the development of antivirals or vaccines against MERS-CoV. However, in terms of implication for the pathogenesis in human MERS, findings from these hDPP4 transgenic mice must be interpreted with great caution. An in-depth investigation of the tissue tropisms of MERS-CoV in human hosts will facilitate our understanding towards the transmission route and pathogenesis of MERS.

The MERS-CoV mouse models have been utilized to test the efficacy of antiviral drug, neutralization antibody and vaccine. A Venezuelan equine encephalitis replication particle expressing MERS-CoV spike protein (VRP-S) was demonstrated to substantially reduce the virus titer in lung tissues of the immunized hDPP4 transduced mouse model [44]. The same group subsequent examined the VRP-S in a more permissive hDPP4 transgenic mouse model [59]. The VRP-S immunized hDPP4 transgenic mice were completely protected from lethal infection. Pretreatment with serum of the mouse immunized with VRP-S can also be protected from fatal infection [59]. Two fully human neutralization antibodies binding to distinct epitopes of MERS spike protein, which were generated using the mouse expressing human antibody, displayed the pre- and post-exposure protection efficacy from MERS-CoV infection in hDPP4 transgenic mice [61].

Conclusions

The pathogenesis of human MERS-CoV infection remains poorly understood. Human respiratory epithelium is highly susceptible to MERS-CoV and can support productive viral replication. However, MERS-CoV has evolved multiple antagonistic mechanisms to attenuate the induction of antiviral and proinflammatory cytokines in the affected epithelial cells. Additionally, MERS-CoV can readily infect and robustly replicate in human macrophages and dendritic cells, which elicits the aberrant production of proinflammatory cytokines/chemokines. MERS-CoV can also effectively infect human primary T cells and induce massive apoptosis in these cells. Although clinical presentations as well as in vitro and ex vivo studies implicated the potential virus dissemination upon MERS-CoV infection, the extrapulmonary involvement has not been ascertained. In the MERS-CoV permissive animal models, viral RNA can be detected from multiple organs of the infected animals. However, recovery of the infectious virus was unsuccessful in most extrapulmonary organs. More studies are warranted to further characterize the tissue tropisms of MERS-CoV for the better understanding towards the pathogenesis of MERS.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The studies were partially supported by Theme-based Research (TBR) Scheme (T11/707/15, Research Grants Council of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region), National Science and Technology Major Projects of Infectious Disease (2012ZX10004501-004) and Health and Medical Research Fund (HMRF 14131392, Food and Health Bureau, The Government of Hong Kong Special Administrative Region).

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
State Key Laboratory of Emerging Infectious Diseases, The University of Hong Kong
(2)
Department of Microbiology, The University of Hong Kong, Queen Mary Hospital
(3)
Research Centre of Infection and Immunology, The University of Hong Kong
(4)
Carol Yu Centre for Infection, The University of Hong Kong

References

  1. Zaki AM, van Boheemen S, Bestebroer TM, Osterhaus AD, Fouchier RA. Isolation of a novel coronavirus from a man with pneumonia in Saudi Arabia. N Engl J Med. 2012;367:1814–20.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. de Groot RJ, Baker SC, Baric RS, Brown CS, Drosten C, Enjuanes L, et al. Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV): announcement of the coronavirus study group. J Virol. 2013;87:7790–2.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Middle East Respiratory Syndrome coronavirus, Disease outbreak news [http://www.who.int/csr/don/23-september-2015-mers-kuwait/en/]
  4. Haagmans BL, Al Dhahiry SH, Reusken CB, Raj VS, Galiano M, Myers R, et al. Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus in dromedary camels: an outbreak investigation. Lancet Infect Dis. 2014;14:140–5.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Reusken CB, Haagmans BL, Muller MA, Gutierrez C, Godeke GJ, Meyer B, et al. Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus neutralising serum antibodies in dromedary camels: a comparative serological study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2013;13:859–66.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Chan JF, Lau SK, To KK, Cheng VC, Woo PC, Yuen KY. Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus: another zoonotic betacoronavirus causing SARS-like disease. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2015;28:465–522.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. To KK, Hung IF, Chan JF, Yuen KY. From SARS coronavirus to novel animal and human coronaviruses. J Thorac Dis. 2013;5 Suppl 2:S103–108.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Chan JF, To KK, Tse H, Jin DY, Yuen KY. Interspecies transmission and emergence of novel viruses: lessons from bats and birds. Trends Microbiol. 2013;21:544–55.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Lau SK, Li KS, Tsang AK, Lam CS, Ahmed S, Chen H, et al. Genetic characterization of betacoronavirus lineage C viruses in bats reveals marked sequence divergence in the spike protein of pipistrellus Bat coronavirus HKU5 in Japanese pipistrelle: implications for the origin of the novel middle east respiratory syndrome coronavirus. J Virol. 2013;87:8638–50.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Korean Society of Infectious D. Korean society for healthcare-associated infection C, prevention: an unexpected outbreak of Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus infection in the republic of Korea, 2015. Infect Chemother. 2015;47:120–2.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Chan JF, Lau SK, Woo PC. The emerging novel Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus: the “knowns” and “unknowns”. J Formos Med Assoc. 2013;112:372–81.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Chan JF, Choi GK, Tsang AK, Tee KM, Lam HY, Yip CC, et al. Development and evaluation of novel real-time reverse transcription-PCR assays with locked nucleic acid probes targeting leader sequences of human-pathogenic coronaviruses. J Clin Microbiol. 2015;53:2722–6.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Assiri A, Al-Tawfiq JA, Al-Rabeeah AA, Al-Rabiah FA, Al-Hajjar S, Al-Barrak A, et al. Epidemiological, demographic, and clinical characteristics of 47 cases of Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus disease from Saudi Arabia: a descriptive study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2013;13:752–61.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Al-Tawfiq JA, Hinedi K, Ghandour J, Khairalla H, Musleh S, Ujayli A, et al. Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus: a case–control study of hospitalized patients. Clin Infect Dis. 2014;59:160–5.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Guery B, Poissy J, el Mansouf L, Sejourne C, Ettahar N, Lemaire X, et al. Clinical features and viral diagnosis of two cases of infection with Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus: a report of nosocomial transmission. Lancet. 2013;381:2265–72.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Who Mers-Cov Research G: State of Knowledge and Data Gaps of Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus (MERS-CoV) in Humans. PLoS Curr 2013, 5.doi:10.1371/currents.outbreaks
  17. Corman VM, Albarrak AM, Omrani AS, Albarrak MM, Farah ME, Almasri M, Muth D, Sieberg A, Meyer B, Assiri AM, et al.: Viral shedding and antibody response in 37 patients with MERS-coronavirus infection. Clin Infect Dis 2015, Epub ahead of printGoogle Scholar
  18. Peiris JS, Guan Y, Yuen KY. Severe acute respiratory syndrome. Nat Med. 2004;10:S88–97.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Cheng VC, Lau SK, Woo PC, Yuen KY. Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus as an agent of emerging and reemerging infection. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2007;20:660–94.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Peiris JS, Lai ST, Poon LL, Guan Y, Yam LY, Lim W, et al. Coronavirus as a possible cause of severe acute respiratory syndrome. Lancet. 2003;361:1319–25.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Kindler E, Jonsdottir HR, Muth D, Hamming OJ, Hartmann R, Rodriguez R, et al. Efficient replication of the novel human betacoronavirus EMC on primary human epithelium highlights its zoonotic potential. MBio. 2013;4:e00611–00612.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Zielecki F, Weber M, Eickmann M, Spiegelberg L, Zaki AM, Matrosovich M, et al. Human cell tropism and innate immune system interactions of human respiratory coronavirus EMC compared to those of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus. J Virol. 2013;87:5300–4.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Chan RW, Chan MC, Agnihothram S, Chan LL, Kuok DI, Fong JH, et al. Tropism of and innate immune responses to the novel human betacoronavirus lineage C virus in human ex vivo respiratory organ cultures. J Virol. 2013;87:6604–14.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Hocke AC, Becher A, Knepper J, Peter A, Holland G, Tonnies M, et al. Emerging human middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus causes widespread infection and alveolar damage in human lungs. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2013;188:882–6.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Lau SK, Lau CC, Chan KH, Li CP, Chen H, Jin DY, et al. Delayed induction of proinflammatory cytokines and suppression of innate antiviral response by the novel Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus: implications for pathogenesis and treatment. J Gen Virol. 2013;94:2679–90.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Yang Y, Zhang L, Geng H, Deng Y, Huang B, Guo Y, et al. The structural and accessory proteins M, ORF 4a, ORF 4b, and ORF 5 of Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) are potent interferon antagonists. Protein Cell. 2013;4:951–61.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Siu KL, Yeung ML, Kok KH, Yuen KS, Kew C, Lui PY, et al. Middle east respiratory syndrome coronavirus 4a protein is a double-stranded RNA-binding protein that suppresses PACT-induced activation of RIG-I and MDA5 in the innate antiviral response. J Virol. 2014;88:4866–76.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Yang X, Chen X, Bian G, Tu J, Xing Y, Wang Y, et al. Proteolytic processing, deubiquitinase and interferon antagonist activities of Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus papain-like protease. J Gen Virol. 2014;95:614–26.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Mielech AM, Kilianski A, Baez-Santos YM, Mesecar AD, Baker SC. MERS-CoV papain-like protease has deISGylating and deubiquitinating activities. Virology. 2014;450–451:64–70.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Falzarano D, de Wit E, Rasmussen AL, Feldmann F, Okumura A, Scott DP, et al. Treatment with interferon-alpha2b and ribavirin improves outcome in MERS-CoV-infected rhesus macaques. Nat Med. 2013;19:1313–7.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Chan JF, Yao Y, Yeung ML, Deng W, Bao L, Jia L, et al. Treatment with Lopinavir/ritonavir or interferon-beta1b improves outcome of MERS-CoV infection in a nonhuman primate model of common marmoset. J Infect Dis. 2015;212(12):1904–13.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Chan JF, Chan KH, Choi GK, To KK, Tse H, Cai JP, et al. Differential cell line susceptibility to the emerging novel human betacoronavirus 2c EMC/2012: implications for disease pathogenesis and clinical manifestation. J Infect Dis. 2013;207:1743–52.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Zhou J, Chu H, Li C, Wong BH, Cheng ZS, Poon VK, et al. Active replication of Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus and aberrant induction of inflammatory cytokines and chemokines in human macrophages: implications for pathogenesis. J Infect Dis. 2014;209:1331–42.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Yilla M, Harcourt BH, Hickman CJ, McGrew M, Tamin A, Goldsmith CS, et al. SARS-coronavirus replication in human peripheral monocytes/macrophages. Virus Res. 2005;107:93–101.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Tseng CT, Perrone LA, Zhu H, Makino S, Peters CJ. Severe acute respiratory syndrome and the innate immune responses: modulation of effector cell function without productive infection. J Immunol. 2005;174:7977–85.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Ziegler T, Matikainen S, Ronkko E, Osterlund P, Sillanpaa M, Siren J, et al. Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus fails to activate cytokine-mediated innate immune responses in cultured human monocyte-derived dendritic cells. J Virol. 2005;79:13800–5.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Cheung CY, Poon LL, Ng IH, Luk W, Sia SF, Wu MH, et al. Cytokine responses in severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-infected macrophages in vitro: possible relevance to pathogenesis. J Virol. 2005;79:7819–26.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Chu H, Zhou J, Wong BH, Li C, Cheng ZS, Lin X, et al. Productive replication of Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus in monocyte-derived dendritic cells modulates innate immune response. Virology. 2014;454–455:197–205.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Scheuplein VA, Seifried J, Malczyk AH, Miller L, Hocker L, Vergara-Alert J, et al. High secretion of interferons by human plasmacytoid dendritic cells upon recognition of Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus. J Virol. 2015;89:3859–69.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Law HK, Cheung CY, Ng HY, Sia SF, Chan YO, Luk W, et al. Chemokine up-regulation in SARS-coronavirus-infected, monocyte-derived human dendritic cells. Blood. 2005;106:2366–74.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Zhao J, Zhao J, Van Rooijen N, Perlman S. Evasion by stealth: inefficient immune activation underlies poor T cell response and severe disease in SARS-CoV-infected mice. PLoS Pathog. 2009;5:e1000636.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. van den Brand JM, Smits SL, Haagmans BL. Pathogenesis of Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus. J Pathol. 2015;235:175–84.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Gu J, Gong E, Zhang B, Zheng J, Gao Z, Zhong Y, et al. Multiple organ infection and the pathogenesis of SARS. J Exp Med. 2005;202:415–24.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  44. Zhao JC, Li K, Wohlford-Lenane C, Agnihothram SS, Fett C, Zhao JX, et al. Rapid generation of a mouse model for Middle East respiratory syndrome. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014;111:4970–5.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  45. Chu H, Zhou J, Wong BH, Li C, Chan JF, Cheng ZS, Yang D, Wang D, Lee AC, Li C, et al.: Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus Efficiently Infects Human Primary T Lymphocytes and Activates the Extrinsic and Intrinsic Apoptosis Pathways. J Infect Dis 2015. Epub ahead of printGoogle Scholar
  46. Chen J, Lau YF, Lamirande EW, Paddock CD, Bartlett JH, Zaki SR, et al. Cellular immune responses to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV) infection in senescent BALB/c mice: CD4+ T cells are important in control of SARS-CoV infection. J Virol. 2010;84:1289–301.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  47. Raj VS, Mou H, Smits SL, Dekkers DH, Muller MA, Dijkman R, et al. Dipeptidyl peptidase 4 is a functional receptor for the emerging human coronavirus-EMC. Nature. 2013;495:251–4.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  48. van Doremalen N, Miazgowicz KL, Milne-Price S, Bushmaker T, Robertson S, Scott D, et al. Host species restriction of Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus through its receptor, dipeptidyl peptidase 4. J Virol. 2014;88:9220–32.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  49. Raj VS, Smits SL, Provacia LB, van den Brand JM, Wiersma L, Ouwendijk WJ, et al. Adenosine deaminase acts as a natural antagonist for dipeptidyl peptidase 4-mediated entry of the Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus. J Virol. 2014;88:1834–8.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  50. Cockrell AS, Peck KM, Yount BL, Agnihothram SS, Scobey T, Curnes NR, et al. Mouse dipeptidyl peptidase 4 is not a functional receptor for Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus infection. J Virol. 2014;88:5195–9.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  51. Coleman CM, Matthews KL, Goicochea L, Frieman MB. Wild-type and innate immune-deficient mice are not susceptible to the Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus. J Gen Virol. 2014;95:408–12.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  52. de Wit E, Prescott J, Baseler L, Bushmaker T, Thomas T, Lackemeyer MG, et al. The Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) does not replicate in Syrian hamsters. PLoS One. 2013;8:e69127.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  53. Haagmans BL, van den Brand JM, Provacia LB, Raj VS, Stittelaar KJ, Getu S, et al. Asymptomatic Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus infection in rabbits. J Virol. 2015;89:6131–5.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  54. Wernery U, Corman VM, Wong EY, Tsang AK, Muth D, Lau SK, et al. Acute middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus infection in livestock Dromedaries, Dubai, 2014. Emerg Infect Dis. 2015;21:1019–22.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  55. Munster VJ, de Wit E, Feldmann H. Pneumonia from human coronavirus in a macaque model. N Engl J Med. 2013;368:1560–2.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  56. de Wit E, Rasmussen AL, Falzarano D, Bushmaker T, Feldmann F, Brining DL, et al. Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) causes transient lower respiratory tract infection in rhesus macaques. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013;110:16598–603.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  57. Falzarano D, de Wit E, Feldmann F, Rasmussen AL, Okumura A, Peng X, et al. Infection with MERS-CoV causes lethal pneumonia in the common marmoset. PLoS Pathog. 2014;10:e1004250.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  58. Agrawal AS, Garron T, Tao X, Peng BH, Wakamiya M, Chan TS, et al. Generation of a transgenic mouse model of Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus infection and disease. J Virol. 2015;89:3659–70.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  59. Li K, Wohlford-Lenane C, Perlman S, Zhao J, Jewell AK, Reznikov LR, Gibson-Corley KN, Meyerholz DK, McCray PB, Jr.: Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus Causes Multiple Organ Damage and Lethal Disease in Mice Transgenic for Human Dipeptidyl Peptidase 4. J Infect Dis 2015. Epub ahead of printGoogle Scholar
  60. Pascal KE, Coleman CM, Mujica AO, Kamat V, Badithe A, Fairhurst J, et al. Pre- and postexposure efficacy of fully human antibodies against spike protein in a novel humanized mouse model of MERS-CoV infection. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015;112:8738–43.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  61. Peiris JS, Chu CM, Cheng VC, Chan KS, Hung IF, Poon LL, et al. Clinical progression and viral load in a community outbreak of coronavirus-associated SARS pneumonia: a prospective study. Lancet. 2003;361:1767–72.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Zhou et al. 2015