A new duck circovirus sequence, detected in velvet scoter (Melanitta fusca) supports great diversity among this species of virus
© Matczuk et al. 2015
Received: 5 May 2015
Accepted: 28 July 2015
Published: 8 August 2015
The aim of this study was to investigate the presence of circoviruses in wild bird populations, in Poland. Circoviruses possess immuno-suppressive properties and might interfere with the health of wild birds.
83 birds, which belonged to 23 species, were tested with broad-range, nested PCR. The obtained PCR products were sequenced and new primers designed, to analyse the full-length, viral genome. A phylogenetic analysis was conducted, to find any relationship to known circoviruses.
The circovirus DNA sequence was found in 4 birds. All samples originated from the velvet scoter (Melanitta fusca) a marine duck from the Merginae sub-family. Birds which tested positive for the circovirus were found dead in fishing nets, off the Baltic coast. During post-mortem examination, carcasses of two of the scoters showed only light emaciation, while the two other birds appeared healthy. The obtained, full-length, circovirus sequence revealed 1,988 nucleotides and the presence of typical features (i.e. Cap, Rep and ORF3). Nucleotide similarity to other duck circoviruses was 84 to 86 %. Phylogenetic analysis of the complete genome and cap gene, indicated that the new circovirus is related to known duck circoviruses, especially to sub-types sometimes referred to as duck circovirus genotype 1, but not genotype 2.
In this study, we have reported a new duck circovirus sequence detected in the velvet scoter, a species of marine duck. Sequence comparison and phylogenetic analysis of the new virus sequence support previous reports that duck circovirus (DuCV) is a species with a high degree of diversity. The viral sequence obtained from the velvet scoter suggests that DuCV may infect birds from the Anatinae sub-family. More studies are needed to prove if the velvet scoter and other marine ducks act as a reservoir for DuCV.
Viruses from the Circoviridae family infect a wide range of vertebrates. The virions are about 20 nm in diameter and are composed of naked nucleocapsids, with a circular, single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) genome of approximately 2 kbp, in size . The genome organization is ambisense, meaning that the two main, open reading frames (ORFs) responsible for encoding replicase (Rep) and capsid (Cap) respectively, are arranged inversely . Some circoviruses also encode the third, small protein, known as ORF3, which is usually inversely nested, within the coding sequence of Rep. Between the stop codons of the ORFs of Cap and Rep, a hairpin -like structure is known to consist of a palindromic sequence. This structure is the point of origin for replication (Ori) of the circovirus .
In domestic animals, circovirus infections might be sub-clinical, but often manifest themselves as serious diseases, with a high, economic impact . Some examples include, porcine circovirus 2 (PCV2) affecting pigs worldwide , psittacine beak and feather disease virus (PBFDV) which is a causative agent of the aforementioned disease, in many psittacine birds . In chickens, the chicken anaemia virus (CAV) which belongs to the Gyrovirus genus, is responsible for the depletion of immune cells, immuno-suppression and growth abnormalities . In domestic ducks, duck circovirus (DuCV) affects mostly young animals. The disease is associated with feathering disorders, poor body condition, low body weight and severe immuno-suppression . The International Committee on the Taxonomy of Viruses (ICTV) recognises DuCV as a single species. However, based on the genomic sequences of DuCV, some scientists divide this circovirus into two genotypes; DuCV 1 and DuCV 2 [8, 9]. A similar disease occurs in domestic geese and is caused by the closely related goose circovirus (GoCV) .
In wild birds, different circovirus species have been detected and characterized, among them, viruses infecting finch, gull, raven and starling [11–13]. In wild waterfowl, two different types of swan circovirus have been discovered in mute swans . Due to minimal data on circovirus infections, among the free-roaming, avian species available in the world, it is supposed that circovirus infections, in wild birds, display similar symptoms to those observed in domestic birds. In some wild bird species, feather abnormalities have been observed, but primarily, circovirus infections are asymptomatic and associated with immuno-suppression, leading to bird emaciation and an increased susceptibility to secondary pathogens [12, 15, 16].
Cross-infection between closely related avian species remains a possibility, but only between related species, because of a high degree of circovirus host-specificity. Cross-infection between free-living ducks or geese and their farmed counterparts are also considered possible .
Although it is known that circovirus infections of farmed geese and ducks are common and widespread, at present, there is a lack of information about the prevalence of the duck or goose circovirus and about the affinity of free-living, bird circoviruses to those isolated from domestic birds.
The aim of this study was to investigate the presence of circoviruses in the wild bird population of Poland. The new DuCV DNA sequence was detected in one of the species: the velvet scoter (Melanitta fusca) and subsequently characterized.
DNA of circovirus detected in free-living birds
Order of birds
Species of bird (english/latin)
Number of birds tested
Number (%) of circovirus positive birds
mallard duck/Anas platyrhynchos
long-tailed duck/Clangula hyemalis
velvet scoter/Melanitta fusca
common scoter/Melanitta nigra
common swift/Apus apus
eurasian coot/Fulica atra
eurasian siskin/Carduelis spinus
green finch/Carduelis chloris
black redstart/Phoenicurus ochruros
hooded crow/Corvus cornix
great crested grebe/Podiceps cristatus
little owl/Athene noctua
snowy owl/Bubo scandiacus
pygmy owl/Glausidium passerinum
tawny owl/Stric aluco
great cormorant/Phalacrocorax carbo
In total, 23 velvet scoters were tested, which means that prevalence in this bird species was 17.4 %. In some birds, the virus was detected only in the DNA sample from the liver (bird 8) the spleen (bird 3) or, in both samples (bird 23 and bird 1) (Fig. 1). A smaller, weaker PCR product was also visible on the gel of positive samples (Fig. 1). Circovirus DNA was not detected in any other tested bird species. The 350 bp PCR products were sequenced and analysed with BLAST, which showed that these partial sequences of the rep gene have a nucleic acid similarity of 88 to 91 %, with those of known duck circoviruses. Using primers specific to duck circovirus, the 600 bp product corresponding to a partial, rep gene sequence was obtained from all 4 positive samples, in nested PCR, while the DNA from the other 19 velvet scoters was negative. BLAST analysis of the amplified 600 bp product, showed that these partial sequences of the rep gene have a nucleic acid similarity of 91 to 92 %, with those of known duck circoviruses, and 99 % among themselves. Amplification of the 1,700 bp product, comprising of the remaining circovirus sequence, was possible for 3 out of 4 samples (sample 1, 3, and 8, but not 23). These PCR products were subjected to cloning (using a PCR cloning kit, Qiagen). However, regardless of multiple attempts and protocol optimizations, we were unable to obtain any positive clone. Direct sequencing, with multiple primers, revealed the whole, circular, ssDNA circovirus sequence of 1,988 nt, which was deposited in GenBank (accession number KP943594). In this paper, the new viral sequence will be called DuCV VS.
BLAST analysis showed that the whole genome sequence of DuCV VS is most similar (86 % similarity) to the DuCV strain HZ09 (EU344802.1).
In this study, we have reported the discovery of a new, circular ssDNA genomic sequence from the liver and spleen samples of a marine duck, the velvet scoter, as collected in Poland.
The circovirus infection of Anseriformes is multi-systemic and the virus can be detected in the bursa of Fabricius, spleen, liver, kidney and thymus [18, 10]. The bursa is the most predominant place for circovirus replication, in birds. Unfortunately, the preparation of this organ is possible only in young birds. In other visceral organs, circovirus DNA can be detected on various days, post-infection. In the case of the experimental GoCV infection of young geese, viral DNA was detected in liver only 28 days post-infection (d.p.i.) and in the spleen 49 d.p.i., while in the bursa of Fabricius, at all tested time points, 28, 35 and 49 d.p.i. . In our study, examined birds showed the presence of viral DNA, in both liver and spleen, or only in one organ of the two tested.
Only 2 of the circovirus positive birds showed slight emaciation, so it seems that the infection is only sub-clinical, in adult velvet scoter. To confirm this, more samples should be analysed, especially ones originating from young birds. This is also important, because the velvet scoter is an endangered species .
Interestingly, during a bacteriological investigation of the same birds, we found that only 4 circovirus, positive velvet scoters were co-infected with Campylobacter spp. (3 Campylobacter jejuni and 1 Capmylobacter lari) while these bacteria were never isolated from any of the tested circovirus, negative velvet scoter (Krawiec M., data not published). Some authors have reported that other bacterial infections, such as Chlamydia psitaci and Salmonella spp. seem to be more prevalent in birds co-infected with circoviruses [19, 20].
In this study, the circovirus sequence was not detected in other tested bird species. This could be either due to the lack of circoviruses circulating in those species, seasonal factors or the total number of birds from each tested species. For instance, 8 other Anseriformes were negative and the mallard duck often harboured the duck circovirus sequence [15, 16].
Based on sequence analysis, the new sequence is related to the duck circovirus. According to Circoviridae taxonomy rules, the new circovirus sequence must possess more than 20 % sequence divergence from the already-known viral genome, to be considered as an individual virus species . Therefore, the new circovirus sequence is not divergent enough to be called a distinct virus species, at least when only the DNA sequence is compared.
Based on phylogenetic analysis, it has been proposed that duck circoviruses are grouped into two genotypes DuCV 1 and DuCV 2 [8, 9]. The ICTV does not recognise this division. However, for the phylogenetic analysis of DuCV VS, the distinction of two separate genotypes was considered.
The phylogenetic analysis of the whole genome and the cap gene alone, showed that the new circovirus is related to DuCV genotype 1. But analysing the rep gene alone gives a different result, suggesting that the new circovirus does not belong to any particular genotype. Detailed phylogenetic analyses of the PCV1 and PCV2, which are the most studied viruses of the Circoviridae, revealed that the rep gene is subject to the highest selective pressure, and that the cap gene should be used for the phylogenetic analysis, if the whole genome sequence is not available .
Data presented in this study suggests that the circovirus sequence detected in the velvet scoter belong to the DuCV species and seems to be more related to DuCV 1. Overall, the phylogenetic analysis performed with the new sequence of DuCV VS suggests great diversity among DuCV, as a species.
The velvet scoter and mallard duck belong to distinct sub-families, Merginae and Anatinae, respectively. It is not known if the circoviruses can cross species barriers and to establish this, the more sophisticated molecular clock analysis should be conducted . As circoviruses are causing loses in domestic duck and geese, there is also a need to obtain more data from wild species of Anseriformes.
The new circovirus sequence belongs to DuCV and was detected in the velvet scoter. Also, on the basis of the relationship of DuCV VS with the duck circovirus, the possibility of cross-infection occurring between farm and free-living birds cannot be discounted. The sequence of the new circovirus found in the velvet scoter suggests that duck circoviruses are very diverse.
Materials and methods
Samples were collected from September 2011 to August 2013. This study included 83 wild birds, from 10 orders and 23 different species, which are presented in Table 1. All tested birds were dead and material, including liver and spleen, were collected during necropsy. Mallard ducks and Eurasian coots were obtained during the hunting season, by two hunting associations, in accordance with local hunting laws, special permissions and hunting programs. Great cormorants were also included and came from the lakes of the Lower Silesia region. Samples from the great cormorants were obtained during the annual population cull, in Poland, with the consent of the Regional Directorate of Environmental Protection, in Wrocław, Poland (no. WPN. 6205.67.2012.MK.1). Samples from velvet scoters, long-tailed ducks, common scoters, razorbills, guillemots, red throated-loons and great crested grebes were collected from birds found dead in fishing nets, off the Baltic coast, between February and April 2013. When found dead, small garden birds were also brought to our University by ornithologists, veterinarians or private persons. The remaining tested, wild bird species were delivered after death, from wildlife rescue centres, where they died before treatment procedures could be introduced. Research was conducted with the consent of the 2nd Local Ethical Committee for Animal Experiments (Wrocław, Poland; no. 41/2011).
During the necropsy of birds, spleen and liver samples were collected and stored at −20 °C, until further processing. Approximately 25 mg of tissue was subjected to DNA isolation.
DNA extraction, PCR and sequencing
Total DNA was isolated, with a Syngen Tissue DNA Mini Kit (Syngen Biotech, Wrocław, Poland) according to manufacturer’s instructions. During isolation, the sample was treated with 20 μg/ml of RNase A (ThermoScientific). The extracted DNA was eluted in 100 μl of a TE (Tris-hydrochloride buffer, 1 mM EDTA, pH 8.0) and stored at −20 °C. DNA concentration was measured with spectrophotometry and there was approximately 200 ng/ μl of each sample. To amplify the circovirus sequence, the nested PCR, described earlier, was performed . The 25 μ l reaction mixture contained: 0.5 μl of the template DNA, 1× U DreamTaq polimerase (Thermo Scientific) 1× PCR Dream Taq buffer, 80 μM dNTP (Thermo Scientific) and 25 pmol of each of the primers Cv-s (5′AGAGGTGGGTCTTCACNHTBAAYAA3′) Cv-as (5′ AAG GCA GCC ACC CRT ARA ART CRT C 3′) Cn-s (5′ AGC AAG GAA CCC CTC AYY TBC ARG G 3′) and Cn-as (5′ ACG ATG ACT TCN GTC TTS MAR TCA CG 3′) (Genomed, Warszawa, Poland) for the first and second round of PCR, respectively. The reaction mixtures were subjected to a cycling condition, as described in the original publication. The positive control was DNA extracted from the blood of a PBFDV, positive parrot . The second PCR reaction products were visualized on 1.8 % agarose gel, bands were excised from the gel and purified with a Gel-Out kit, according to manufacturer’s instructions (A&A Biotechnology, Gdańsk, Poland). Sanger sequencing was performed with a forward and reverse primer, used for PCR reaction (Genomed, Warszawa, Poland). Readings from both directions were collated and the sequence was subjected to BLAST.
The nucleotide DNA from the positive samples was subjected to another PCR reaction, with primers specific to the duck circovirus rep gene, with the primers DuCv forward (5′ CGG CGC TTG TAC TCC GTA CTC 3′ and DuCv reverse (5′ CCC GCG TGG TTT GTA ATA CTT G 3′) . Products of approximately 600 bp were visualised on 1.8 % agarose gel, excised from the gel and purified with a Gel-Out kit, according to manufacturer’s instructions (A&A Biotechnology, Gdańsk, Poland). Sanger sequencing was performed with a forward and reverse primer, used for PCR reaction (Genomed, Warszawa, Poland). Readings from both directions were collated and, using the nucleotide sequence, a new set of primers was designed for amplification of the remaining, circovirus genomic sequence. These primers were as follows: DuCVCloneFor: 5′ CTA GAA CGG CTT CGT CAC CTG ATC 3′ and DuCVCloneRev: 5′ GAA TCC CTG AAG TGT AGG TGT AC 3′. PCR conditions were as follows: 1 cycle at 94 °C for 5mins, 35 cycles at 94 °C for 30 s, 56 °C for 30 s, 72 °C for 90 s and 1 cycle of 72 °C for 10mins.
For sequencing of the remaining part of the circovirus genome, the PCR reaction was performed on a DNA sample from the spleen of one particular velvet scoter. High fidelity polymerase, Phusion (Thermo Scientific) was used, the conditions were as follows: 1 cycle at 98 °C for 5mins, 35 cycles at 98 °C for 30s, 60 °C for 30s, 72 °C for 90s and 1 cycle at 72 °C for 10mins. The PCR product was prepared for sequencing, as described above. Primers DuCVCloneFor and DuCVCloneRev were used for sequencing, from both directions. The obtained sequences were aligned to one contig, with SeqMan Pro software (Lasergene, USA). To improve sequencing genome coverage, new primers were designed, with the primer walking method: VS500F (5′AGC GGG TCT AAA TTT ATC AAC AT 3′) VS500R (5′ GCT ATC CTC GCC GGT CAG TCG 3′) VS1100F (5′ CGC CAT TGC CGT TGC TAT CC 3′) and VS1100R (5′ GCT TGT GCC CTC CCG TTC C 3′) which amplified 500 bp and 1.100 bp fragments of the circovirus genome, respectively (cycling condition upon request). The PCR product was sequenced, as mentioned earlier and a new consensus sequence was assembled, from contigs obtained from all previous sequencing results, with the use of SeqMan Pro software (Lasergene, USA). The consensus sequence was checked for circularity, with pairwise alignment (NCBI) of the forward and reverse sequence.
Identification of the putative ORFs was made with the aid of an ORF Finder (NCBI). Sequence analyses were performed with BLAST (NCBI). Nucleotide sequences were aligned and compared to other Circoviridae sequences, extracted from GenBank, using the ClustalW algorithm, within MEGA 6.06 software . Phylogenetic analyses were carried out with MEGA 6.06, using the maximum likelihood method and the neighbour joining method, with a bootstrap confidence of 1.000. Amino acid analysis was conducted with ClustaW multiple alignment (NCBI).
The research project was financed by the National Centre for Research and Development- project, number NO 12 0126 10. Publication was supported by the Wroclaw Centre of Biotechnology, The Leading National Research Centre (KNOW) for years 2014–2018.
The authors would like to thank Tomasz Piasecki from the Department of Epizootiology and Clinic of Birds and Exotic Animals, Wrocław University of Environmental and Life Sciences (Poland) who kindly provided PBFD control DNA for this study.
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
- Todd D, Mc Nulty MS, Adair BM, Allan GM. Animal circoviruses. Adv Virus Res. 2001;57:1–70.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Mankertz A, Caliskan R, Hatterman K, Hillenbrand B, Kurzendoerfer P, Mueller B, et al. Molecular biology of Porcine circovirus: analyses of gene expression and viral replication. Vet Microbiol. 2004;98:81–8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Alarcon P, Rushton J, Wieland B. Cost of post-weaning multi-systemic wasting syndrome and porcine circovirus type-2 subclinical infection in England – An economic disease model. Prev Vet Med. 2013;110:88–102.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Allan GM, Ellis JA. Porcine Circoviruses: A Review. J Vet Diagn Invest. 2000;12:3–14.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ritchie BW, Niagro FD, Lukert PD, Steffens WL, Latimer KS. Characterization of a new virus from cockatoos with psittacine beak and feather disease. Virology. 1989;171:83–8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Adair B. Immunopathogenesis of chicken anemia virus infection. Dev Comp Immunol. 2000;24:247–55.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hattermann K, Schmitt C, Soike D, Mankertz A. Cloning and sequencing of Duck circovirus (DuCV). Arch Virol. 2004;148:2471–80.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zhang Z, Jia R, Lu Y, Wang M, Zhu D, Chen S, et al. Identification, genotyping, and molecular evolution analysis of duck circovirus. Gene. 2013;529:288–95.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Fu G, Shi S, Huang Y, Cheng L, Peng C, Wan C, et al. Genetic diversity and genotype analysis of duck circovirus. Avian Dis. 2011;55:311–18.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Guo J, Tian J, Tan X, Yu H, Ding S, Sun H, et al. Pathological observations of an experimental infection of geese with goose circovirus. Avian Pathol. 2011;40:55–61.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Todd D, Scott ANJ, Fringuelli E, Shivraprasad HL, Gavier-Widen D, Smyth JA. Molecular characterization of novel circoviruses from finch and gull. Avian Pathol. 2007;36:75–81.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Stewart ME, Perry R, Raidal SR. Identification of a novel circovirus in Australian ravens (Corvus coronoides) with feather disease. Avian Pathol. 2006;35:86–92.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Johne R, Fernández-de-Luco D, Höfle U, Müller H. Genome of a novel circovirus of starlings, amplified by multiply primed rolling-circle amplification. J Gen Virol. 2006;87:1189–95.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Halami MY, Nieper H, Müller H, Johne R. Detection of a novel circovirus in mute swans (Cygnus olor) by using nested broad-spectrum PCR. Virus Res. 2008;132:208–12.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Woods IW, Latimer KS. Circovirus infection of pigeons and other avian species In: Saif YM, Barnes HJ, Glisson JR, Fadly AM, McDougald LR, Dwayne DE, editors. Diseases of Poultry. 11th edn. Iowa State Press 2007. p. 202–211.Google Scholar
- Todd D, Gortazar C. Circovirus infection In: Gavier-Widen D, Duff JP, Meredith A, editors. Infectious Diseases of wild mammals and birds in Europe. 1st edn. Blackwell Publishing Ltd. 2012. p. 67–72.Google Scholar
- BirdLife International; 2013. Melanitta fusca IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2013.2, International Union for Conservation of Nature. http://www.iucnredlist.org/details/22724836/0
- Banda A, Galloway-Haskins RI, Sandhu TS, Schat KA. Genetic analysis of a duck circovirus detected in commercial pekin ducks in New York. Avian Dis. 2007;51:90–5.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Stenzel T, Pestka D, Choszcz D. The prevalence and genetic characterization of Chlamydia psittaci from domestic and feral pigeons in Poland and the correlation between infection rate and incidence of pigeon circovirus. Poultry Sci. 2014;93:3009–16.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Cha SY, Song ET, Kang M, Wei B, Seo HS, Roh JH, et al. Prevalence of duck circovirus infection of subclinical pekin ducks in South Korea. J Vet Med Sci. 2014;76:597–99.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Biagini P, Bendinelli M, Hino S, Kakkola L. Circoviridae. In: King, AMQ, Adams MJ, Carstens EB, Lefkowitz E. (eds) Virus Taxonomy:Ninth Report of the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses. Elsevier/Academic Press, London. 201:343–49.Google Scholar
- Olvera A, Cortey M, Segalés J. Molecular evolution of porcine circovirus type 2 genomes: phylogeny and clonality. Virology. 2007;357:175–85.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Firth C, Charleston MA, Duffy S, Shapiro B, Holmes EC. Insights into the evolutionary history of an emerging livestock pathogen: porcine circovirus 2. J Virol. 2009;83:12813–21.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Julian L, Piasecki T, Chrząstek K, Walters M, Muhire B, Harkins GW, et al. Extensive recombination detected among beak and feather disease virus isolates from breeding facilities in Poland. J Gen Virol. 2013;94:1086–95.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Tamura K, Peterson D, Peterson N, Stecher G, Kumar S. MEGA5: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol Biol Evol. 2011;28:2731–39.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar