Open Access

Surveillance of avirulent Newcastle disease viruses at live bird markets in Eastern China during 2008–2012 reveals a new sub-genotype of class I virus

  • Jie Zhu1, 2,
  • Haixu Xu1, 2,
  • Jingjing Liu1, 2,
  • Zhenzhen Zhao1, 2,
  • Shunlin Hu1, 2,
  • Xiaoquan Wang1, 2 and
  • Xiufan Liu1, 2Email author
Virology Journal201411:211

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12985-014-0211-2

Received: 15 September 2014

Accepted: 21 November 2014

Published: 4 December 2014

Abstract

Background

The strains of Newcastle disease virus (NDV) can be divided into two distinct clades: class I and class II. At present, limited molecular epidemiological data are available for the class I virus at live bird markets (LBMs). Knowing the genomic and antigenic characteristics of class I NDVs might provide important insights into the evolution dynamics of these viruses. In this study class I NDVs isolated from LBMs in Eastern China between 2008 and 2012 were characterized.

Results

We characterized 34 class I NDVs genetically and 15 of the 34 NDVs pathologically which originated from geese, chickens and ducks at live bird markets. Based on the older classification system, twelve of fourteen strains isolated from 2008 to 2010 belonged to sub-genotype 3b. However, the rest 22 strains formed a separate novel cluster in genotype 3, which was designated as sub-genotype 3c. When based on the new classification system, sub-genotype 3b was classified into sub-genotype 1a and the sub-genotype 3c was classified into sub-genotype 1b. Over 62% (21/34) of the viruses were chicken-origin and only 13 isolates were waterfowl-origin. The Cross-neutralization reactions between CK/JS/05/11, CK/JS/06/12 and the vaccine strain LaSota showed significant antigenic differences between them.

Conclusions

Currently, sub-genotype 3c (or 1b) NDVs are the most frequently isolated classI strains at LBMs in Eastern China., and the class I NDVs has transferred from waterfowls to chickens and circulated in chicken flocks extensively.

Keywords

Class I Newcastle disease virus Sub-genotype 3c Sub-genotype 1b Genetic Antigenticy

Background

Newcastle disease (ND) is caused by Newcastle disease virus(NDV)which has caused severe economic losses all around the world [1],[2]. NDV is a member of avian paramyxovirus (APMV), which belongs to the genus Avulavirus, sub-family Paramyxovirinae, family Paramyxoviridae, and order Mononegavirales[3]. The genome of NDV is a single-stranded, negative-sense, nonsegmented RNA of approximately 15.2 kb. The viral genome is comprised of six genes: nucleocapsid (NP), phosphoprotein (P), matrix (M), fusion (F), hemagglutinin–neuraminidase (HN), and RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (L) [4]. The strains of NDV can be divided into two distinct clades: class I and class II, and based on the older classification system, both clades could be divided into 9 genotypes, and the class II clade can be divided into fifteen genotypes when based on the new classification system, while the class I clade can be divided into three sub-genotypes [5]–[7].

Liu et.al has found that the class I virus strains circulating among Eastern China were genotype 2 and 3, while the genotype 3 can be divided into two sub-genotype: 3a and 3b [8]. In 2012, one class I virus isolated in Eastern China was ascribed to genotype 4 [9], which means that the class I viruses circulating in Eastern China were mix. As Liu et al. [8] only concerned about the class I virus circulating in ducks at LBMs in Eastern China, and deals of chickens were also existed at the live bird markets (LBMs), however, the circulation of the class I virus among chickens has not been well elucidated. In this study, we collected 7106 cloacal swabs from 600 flocks including both chickens and waterfowls for virus isolation from 2008 to 2012 and 34 class I isolates were characterized phylogentically while and 15 of the 34 NDVs were pathologically characterized.

Results

Isolation and identification of the NDVs from the LBMs in Eastern China

We obtained a total of 7106 samples by monthly collections from multiple avian species at LBMs in Eastern China during May 2008 to April 2012, and 247 NDVs were isolated and identified with a total isolation rate of 3.48%. As is shown in Table 1, a total of 3.32% (236/7106) class I NDVs were identified and the isolation rates in colder months (from November to March) were higher than in warmer months (from April to October) which is consistent with the previous report [8]. Furthermore, the monthly isolation rate varied from 0 to 7.5% and the yearly isolation rate varied from 2.91% to 5.67% and January 2012 had the highest isolation rate although no specific thing about these times was found. The 236 class I NDVs were collected from 34 flocks (21 from the chickens and 13 from the waterfowls), and the details for these isolates were listed in Table 2.
Table 1

Monthly isolations of NDVs from cloacal swabs of multiple avian species at live bird markets for wholesale in Eastern China during May 2008 to April 2012

Year

Positive/sample

Total

Isolation rate (%)

Jan

Feb

Mar

Apr

May

June

July

Aug

Sep

Oct

Nov

Dec

2008

-

-

-

-

4/200

8/180

1/90

1/100

10/200

0/100

4/100

4/130

32/1100

2.91

2009

8/200

8/180

5/100

5/140

1/100

5/130

0/130

1/160

2/130

7/200

4/110

5/120

51/1700

3.00

2010

9/160

7/150

11/180

5/140

1/100

5/130

0/140

1/140

2/180

7/190

4/150

5/140

57/1800

3.16

2011

11/180

5/160

8/180

7/140

5/100

2/130

0/150

0/130

4/150

5/160

2/175

7/145

56/1800

3.11

2012

15/200

13/180

10/150

10/176

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

40/706

5.67

total

43/740

33/670

34/610

27/596

11/500

20/570

1/510

3/530

18/660

19/650

14/535

21/535

  

Isolation Rate (%)

5.81

4.93

5.57

4.53

2.20

3.51

0.200

0.57

2.73

2.92

2.62

3.93

 

3.32

Table 2

Details of the representative NDVs isolated from the domestic avian species at LBMs in Eastern China during 2008 to 2012

Virus strains

Year of isolation

Location (Province)

Host

ICPI

MDT

Cleavage site of fusion protein

Class

subgenotype

Accession number

D/JS/1/08

2008

Jiangsu

Duck

0

>120 h

EQQERL

I

3b

KM509016

CK/AH/02/08

2008

Anhui

Chicken

0

>120 h

EQQERL

I

3b

KM509017

Go/SD/03/08

2008

Shandong

Goose

0

>120 h

EQQERL

I

3b

KM509018

CK/HeN/04/08

2008

Henan

Chicken

NTa

NT

EQQERL

I

3b

KM509019

Go/JS/01/09

2009

Jiangsu

Goose

0

>120 h

EQQGRL

I

3b

KM509020

Go/JS/02/09

2009

Jiangsu

Goose

0

>120 h

EQQERL

I

3b

KM509021

D/JS/03/09

2009

Jiangsu

Duck

0

>120 h

ERQERL

I

3c

KM509022

D/JS/04/09

2009

Jiangsu

Duck

NT

NT

EQQERL

I

3b

KM509023

CK/JS/05/09

2009

Jiangsu

Chicken

NT

NT

EQQERL

I

3b

KM509024

CK/SD/06/09

2009

Shandong

Chicken

NT

NT

EQQERL

I

3b

KM509025

D/JS/01/10

2010

Jiangsu

Duck

0

>120 h

EQQERL

I

3b

KM509026

CK/JS/02/10

2010

Jiangsu

Chicken

0

>120 h

ERQERL

I

3c

KM509027

CK/JS/03/10

2010

Jiangsu

Chicken

0

>120 h

EQQERL

I

3b

KM509028

CK/JS/04/10

2010

Jiangsu

Chicken

NT

NT

EQQERL

I

3b

KM509029

D/SH/05/10

2010

Shanghai

Duck

NT

NT

EQQERL

I

3b

KM509030

CK/JS/06/10

2010

Jiangsu

Chicken

NT

NT

ERQERL

I

3b

KM509031

Go/JS/01/11

2011

Jiangsu

Gose

0

>120 h

ERQERL

I

3c

KM509032

CK/JS/02/11

2011

Jiangsu

Chicken

0

>120 h

ERQERL

I

3c

KM509033

CK/JS/03/11

2011

Jiangsu

Chicken

0

>120 h

ERQERL

I

3c

KM509034

CK/JS/04/11

2011

Jiangsu

Chicken

NT

NT

ERQERL

I

3c

KM509035

CK/JS/05/11

2011

Jiangsu

Chicken

NT

NT

ERQERL

I

3c

KM509036

CK/JS/06/11

2011

Jiangsu

Chicken

NT

NT

ERQERL

I

3c

KM509037

CK/JS/07/11

2011

Jiangsu

Chicken

NT

NT

ERQERL

I

3c

KM509038

CK/JS/08/11

2011

Jiangsu

Chicken

NT

NT

ERQERL

I

3c

KM509039

D/JS/01/12

2012

Jiangsu

Duck

NT

NT

ERQERL

I

3c

KM509040

D/JS/02/12

2012

Jiangsu

Duck

0

>120 h

ERQERL

I

3c

KM509041

CK/JS/03/12

2012

Jiangsu

Chicken

0

>120 h

ERQERL

I

3c

KM509042

CK/JS/04/12

2012

Jiangsu

Chicken

0

>120 h

ERQERL

I

3c

KM509043

CK/JS/05/12

2012

Jiangsu

Chicken

NT

NT

ERQERL

I

3c

KM509044

CK/JS/06/12

2012

Jiangsu

Chicken

NT

NT

ERQERL

I

3c

KM509045

Go/JS/07/12

2012

Jiangsu

Goose

NT

NT

ERQERL

I

3c

KM509046

Go/SH/08/12

2012

Shanghai

Goose

NT

NT

ERQERL

I

3c

KM509047

CK/HeN/09/12

2012

Henan

Chicken

NT

NT

ERQERL

I

3c

KM509048

CK/SD/10/12

2012

Shandong

Chicken

NT

NT

ERQERL

I

3c

KM509049

aNT: not test.

Phylogenetic analysis

236 samples were detected to be positive in the 7106 swabs, but the result of sequences showed that the viruses isolated in the same flock were 100% homology. At last, we have got 34 isolates in this manuscript. The F gene of the 34 NDVs from each flock were sequenced and analyzed phylogentically with 20 representative reference class I F gene sequences, and the phylogentic tree was constructed based on the variable region of the F genes (47-420 nt) which was shown in Figure 1.
Figure 1

Phylogenetic tree of class I NDV isolatess based on the older classification methods by the variable region (nt 47–420) of the F gene. The reference class I NDV isolates characterized in this study were shown in bold.

Based on the previous classification system, all the viruses were grouped together with the Hong Kong LBM strains and the earlier Eastern China strains which have been designated as genotype 3 [5],[6],[8]. Except CK/JS/02/10 and D/JS/03/09, all strains isolated among 2008 to 2010 were grouped together with two duck-origin virus isolated in Jiangsu and Zhejiang (D/ZJ/26/05, D/JS/1/07) that have been designated as sub-genotype 3b [8]. However, the rest 22strains formed a new cluster which evolutionary distance with sub-genotype 3a and 3b was 0.068 and 0.099 (Table 3), respectively. Therefore, this new cluster was separated from the two established sub-genotypes in genotype 3 and designated as sub-genotype 3c. As is shown in Figure 2, when utilized the new classification system proposed by Diel et al. [7], the 34 strains could also be clustered into two separated sub-genotypes: 1a and 1b. Meanwhile, the sub-genotype 3b belonged to sub-genotype 1a in the new classification system and sub-genotype 3c belonged to sub-genotype 1b.
Table 3

Estimation of evolutionary distances between sub-genotypes of genotype 3

Sub-genotype

Evolutionary distances

3a

3b

3c

3a

 

0.021

0.016

3b

0.101

 

0.020

3c

0.068

0.099

 
Figure 2

Phylogenetic tree of class I NDV isolatess based on the new classification methods by the complete sequence the F genes. The reference class I NDV isolates characterized in this study were shown in bold.

The above genotypic classification of NDVs could be also reflected by comparisons of the deduced amino acid sequence of the F gene. When deduced amino acid sequences of the F gene of the three sub-genotypes were compared, different amino acid profiles were present between the 3c and the other 2 sub-genotype NDVs in genotype 3. Three different amino acids were present between the 3a and 3c viruses of F gene (Table 4), and 3c strains displayed the substitutions W10L, E47D and V118I. As shown in Table 4, when compared with the sub-genotype 3b viruses, the 3c viruses had the following amino acid substitutions: P6S, V19A, S36P, R48K, I69M, Q113R, I165V, T176A, I206V, F214L, S231L, V237I, Y337H, I386L, L396M, R445Q, D489N, T522A, R530K and S531A.
Table 4

Subtype-specific residue substitutions in the deduced genotype 3 F protein sequence

Sub-genotypes

6

10

12

18

19

22

36

47

48

69

113

118

165

176

206

214

231

237

337

386

396

445

489

522

530

531

S

L

A

V

A

S

P

D

K

M

R

I

V

A

V

L

L

i

H

L

M

Q

N

A

K

A

3a

-a

W

V

-

-

L/-

-

E

-

-

-

-

NTb

NT

NT

NT

NT

NT

NT

NT

NT

NT

NT

NT

NT

NT

3b

P/-

-

T/-

M

V

-

S/-

-

R

I

Q

-

I

T

I

F

S

V

Y

I

L

R

D

T

R

S

3c

-

-

V/-

L/-

T/-

-

Q/-

-

-

-

-

V

L/-

-

G/-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

a-indicates genetic identity with the consensus residue.

bNT: not test.

Pathogenicity tests

We selected 3 viruses each year to test the pathogenicity, and the results of the pathogenicity tests showed that all the selected isolates had an intracerebral pathogenicity index value 0 and a mean death time > 120 h, which was consistent with the tyipical avirulent motif 112EQ/RQERL117 at the F cleavage sites.

Antigenic difference assays

As is shown in Table 5, cross-neutralization and -hemagglutination inhibition reactions between the two isolates confirmed the significant antigenic differences between the isolates and vaccine strain. In the neralization test, the R value between the CK/JS/05/11 and CK/JS/06/12 and LaSota were only 0.17 and 0.12, respectively. When 0.67 ≤ R ≤ 1.5, indicates no significant antigenic difference between the two viruses and 0.5 ≤ R ≤ 0.67 indicates a minor difference between the two viruses. An R value of R < 0.5 indicates a major difference between the two virus strains.
Table 5

Coefficients of antigenic similarity (R) between NDV isolates and LaSota strain

Strain

LaSota

CK/JS/05/11

0.24a 0.17b

CK/JS/06/12

0.27a 0.12b

aCross-hemagglutination inhibition test.

bChicken embryo cross-neutralization test.

Discussion

Currently, most of the avirulent NDVs isolated from the LBMs in America and Korea belonged to class I clade. [10]–[12]. Liu et.al have reported that the class I viruses circulated in waterfowls from 2002 to 2007 at LBMs in Eastern China were genotype 2 and 3 which could be divided into two separated groups: 3a and 3b [8]. In this paper, we conducted the continuous surveillance and characterization of class I clade NDVs both from the chicken and waterfowl flocks at LBMs in Eastern China during 2008 to 2012 and found a new separate cluster in genotype 3 which possessed its own characteristic amino acid substitutions on the F protein (Tables 1 and 2).

During May 2008 to April 2012, 247 NDVs were isolated from the LBMs in Eastern China and 95.5% (236/247) were class I NDVs, which indicated that the class I NDVs were still frequently isolated among the birds at LBMs. Researchers have already ensured that the class I clade NDVs mainly circulated among waterfowls [5],[6],[8], however in this research, 21 of the 34 classI NDV-positive flocks were the chicken-origin, which indicates that the cross-species transmission has been appeared and class I NDVs have already become frequently isolated among the chickens. In china, deals of chickens and waterfowls are made together at the LBMs, therefore the LBM has been one of the important sites for pathogens inter- or cross-species transmission. Considering the higher isolation of the class I NDVs at the LBMs, much attention should be paid to the transmission of class I NDV at this site.

All the isolates in this study were clustered into genotype 3 which was divided into two sub-genotypes 3a and 3b in the previous study [6],[8]. However, a separate cluster was identified here based on the phylogenetic analysis of the partial F genes. As is illustrated by Diel et al. [7], different genotypes should have an average distance per site >10% (0.1) and different sub-genotypes should have an average distance per site between 3 (0.03) and 10% (0.1), while its evolutionary distance with 3a and 3b was 0.068 and 0.099, respectively, which has met the requirement to form a new sub-genotype and was designated here as 3c. Based on the two classification methods, the isolates from 2008–2010 are more similar to older previously studied isolates and the more recent strains (2011–2012) are clustering together and the waterfowl-origin isolation rate is higher than the 2011–2012 isolation rate, which means that the class I NDV is keeping evolution in the poultry flocks and can affect the chickens more efficiency. Comparing the partial F genes between the three sub-genotypes, we found that the sub-genotype 3a and 3c shared the same cleavage site EQQERL and 3c viruses showed both higher nucleotide and amino acid homologous with sub-genotype 3a when compared with 3b. Therefore the sub-genotype 3c viruses might evolve from the sub-genotype 3a.

Previously, seven neutralizing epitopes positioned at residues 72, 74, 75, 78, 79, 157 to 171, and 343 of the F protein have been identified [13]–[16]. When compared the F genes of 3c cluster with the vaccine strain LaSota, four of these epitopes were changed as follows: A75Q, A79S, V168I, and D170S, which displayed the antigenic difference between them and was confirmed by the results derived from the cross-HI and -neutralization tests in this study. Class I NDVs are the avirulent strains usually isolated from waterfowls [5],[8], however, Yu et. al found that the class I avirulent virus could be generated into virulent one through consecutive passages in the chicken only by two residues alteration at the F cleavage site [17]. As is reported that, the virulent class I viruses which were phylogenetically closely related to those found in WS have previously been found [18],[19], and the risk of ND epidemic would be introduced due to its high infection rate in the poultry flocks, the significant antigenic difference and low genetic homology with the vaccine strain [20]. Therefore, continuous surveillance for the class I NDVs both from the LBMs and poultry farms should be performed and strict control strategies should be developed to eliminate the potential risk caused by these NDVs.

Conclusions

The NDVs isolated at LBMs during 2008–2012 belonged to sub-genotype 3b (or 1a), and a newly identified cluster 3c (or 1b) which has already transferred from waterfowls to terrestrial birds and has been frequently isolated in the chicken flocks extensively.

Materials and methods

Virus isolation and identification

We collected cloacal swab samples from the LBMs in Eastern China (Figure 3) since 2008 to 2012, and each flocks we collected 5–15 samples. And all the swabs were inoculated into the allantoic cavities of 9 to 11 day old specific-pathogen-free (SPF) chicken embryos and incubated at 37°C for two passages of 96 hours each [6]. Allantoic fluids from the incubated eggs were harvested after the completion of two passages and were then assayed for hemagglutination activity (HA) by following the OIE protocols for NDV; the presence of NDV was confirmed by hemagglutination inhibition (HI) assay with NDV-specific polyclonal antiserum [21]. The NDV isolates obtained from the surveillance that were selected for pathogenicity tests and genetic studies are presented in Table 2.
Figure 3

Map of China showing Shanghai and Shandong, Henan, Anhui, Jiangsu provinces where sampling birds came from during the NDV surveillance program at LBMs.

Viral RNA exaction

Virus RNA extraction was prepared from infective allantoic fluid using TRIzol LS (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, California, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The RNA pellets were resuspended in RNase-free water after washing with 70% ethanol and were stored at −70°C until use. And the initial RT reaction was performed as described previously [22].

Sequencing of the partial F genes

According to the published F gene sequences from the GenBank database, we designed a pair of primers for the amplification of the partial F genes: FTY1: CGTAGAAAA AACACGGGTAGAAGA (nt 4494–4517), FTY2: CAGGTAGGTRGCACGCATATTATT (5429–5452). The DNA amplification was performed for 25 cycles consisting of 30 seconds at 94°C, 1 min at 58°C, and followed by a final elongation of 10 min at 72°C. The complete F genes were amplified by the primes designed by Liu et al. [8]. The PCR products were sequenced at Sangon (Shanghai, China).

Phylogenetic analysis and inference of the evolutionary distances

In this study, we obtained class I reference NDV F gene sequences representing previously class I genotypes 1 to 9 based on the previously established classification system and reference strains representing the newly established classification system as 1a, 1b and 1c from the Genbank, while the accession numbers of these NDVs were shown in the phylogenetic trees. The prediction of amino acid sequences, alignment of sequences, and phylogenetic analysis were performed using MegAlign in the Lasergene package (DNASTAR Inc. Madison, WI, U.S.). Phylogenetic tree was created using the neighbor-joining method and MEGA 5.2 based on comparison of partial F gene sequences (between nt 47 and 420). The evolutionary distances were inferred by the software MEGA5 and the mean interpopulational evolutionary diversity (mean evolutionary distance between genotypes) was determined using the Maximum Composite Likelihood model [7],[23].

Pathogenicity tests

The intracerebral pathogenicity index in 1-day-old chicks and the mean death time in 9 to 11-day-old SPF chicken embryos were determined for some of the isolates in this study as Liu did previously [2].

Comparision of the antigenic difference between the isolates and vaccine strain

The anti-serum against CK/JS/06/12, CK/JS/05/11 and LaSota were prepared from the SPF chickens vaccinated with inactivated oil-emulsion LaSota, CK/JS/06/12 and CK/JS/05/11, respectively. Three weeks post-vaccination, serum were collected and stored at −70°C until use. The coss-haemagglutination inhibition (HI) and cross-neutralization tests to measure the antigenic difference between the isolates and the vaccination strain LaSota, were performed as described previously [24].

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by Chinese Special Fund for Agro-Scientific Research in the Public Interest (201303033, 201003012), the Earmarked Fund for Modern Agro-Industry Technology Research System (nycytx-41-G07), National Natural Science Foundation of China (31172338), and the Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD).

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Animal Infectious Disease Laboratory,College of Veterinary Medicine, Yangzhou University
(2)
Jiangsu Co-innovation Center for Prevention and Control of Important Animal Infectious Diseases and Zoonoses, Yangzhou University

References

  1. Alexander DJ: Newcastle disease and other avian paramyxoviruses. Rev Sci Tech 2000, 19: 443-462.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Liu XF, Wan HQ, Ni XX, Wu YT, Liu WB: Pathotypical and genotypical characterization of strains of Newcastle disease virus isolated from outbreaks in chicken and goose flocks in some regions of China during 1985–2001. Arch Virol 2003, 148: 1387-1403.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Mayo MA: A summary of taxonomic changes recently approved by ICTV. Arch Virol 2002, 147: 1655-1663. 10.1007/s007050200039PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Kattenbelt JA, Stevens MP, Gould AR: Sequence variation in the Newcastle disease virus genome. Virus Res 2006, 116: 168-184. 10.1016/j.virusres.2005.10.001PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Kim LM, King DJ, Curry PE, Suarez DL, Swayne DE, Stallknecht DE, Slemons RD, Pedersen JC, Senne DA, Winker K, Afonso CL: Phylogenetic diversity among low-virulence newcastle disease viruses from waterfowl and shorebirds and comparison of genotype distributions to those of poultry-origin isolates. J Virol 2007, 81: 12641-12653. 10.1128/JVI.00843-07PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Kim LM, King DJ, Suarez DL, Wong CW, Afonso CL: Characterization of class I Newcastle disease virus isolates from Hong Kong live bird markets and detection using real-time reverse transcription-PCR. J Clin Microbiol 2007, 45: 1310-1314. 10.1128/JCM.02594-06PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Diel DG, da Silva LH, Liu H, Wang Z, Miller PJ, Afonso CL: Genetic diversity of avian paramyxovirus type 1: proposal for a unified nomenclature and classification system of Newcastle disease virus genotypes. Infect Genet Evol 2012, 12: 1770-1779. 10.1016/j.meegid.2012.07.012PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Liu X, Wang X, Wu S, Hu S, Peng Y, Xue F: Surveillance for avirulent Newcastle disease viruses in domestic ducks (Anas platyrhynchos and Cairina moschata) at live bird markets in Eastern China and characterization of the viruses isolated. Avian Pathol 2009, 38: 377-391. 10.1080/03079450903183637PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Meng C, Qiu X, Jin S, Yu S, Chen H, Ding C: Whole genome sequencing and biological characterization of Duck/JS/10, a new lentogenic class I Newcastle disease virus. Arch Virol 2012, 157: 869-880. 10.1007/s00705-012-1248-4PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Choi KS, Lee EK, Jeon WJ, Kwon JH, Lee JH, Sung HW: Molecular epidemiologic investigation of lentogenic Newcastle disease virus from domestic birds at live bird markets in Korea. Avian Dis 2012, 56: 218-223. 10.1637/9699-030311-ResNote.1PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. King DJ, Seal BS: Biological and molecular characterization of Newcastle disease virus isolates from surveillance of live bird markets in the northeastern United States. Avian Dis 1997, 41: 683-689. 10.2307/1592161PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Seal BS, Wise MG, Pedersen JC, Senne DA, Alvarez R, Scott MS, King DJ, Yu Q, Kapczynski DR: Genomic sequences of low-virulence avian paramyxovirus-1 (Newcastle disease virus) isolates obtained from live-bird markets in North America not related to commonly utilized commercial vaccine strains. Vet Microbiol 2005, 106: 7-16. 10.1016/j.vetmic.2004.11.013PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Neyt C, Geliebter J, Slaoui M, Morales D, Meulemans G, Burny A: Mutations located on both F1 and F2 subunits of the Newcastle disease virus fusion protein confer resistance to neutralization with monoclonal antibodies. J Virol 1989, 63: 952-954.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Toyoda T, Gotoh B, Sakaguchi T, Kida H, Nagai Y: Identification of amino acids relevant to three antigenic determinants on the fusion protein of Newcastle disease virus that are involved in fusion inhibition and neutralization. J Virol 1988, 62: 4427-4430.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Yusoff K, Nesbit M, McCartney H, Meulemans G, Alexander DJ, Collins MS, Emmerson PT, Samson AC: Location of neutralizing epitopes on the fusion protein of Newcastle disease virus strain Beaudette C. J Gen Virol 1989,70(Pt 11):3105-3109. 10.1099/0022-1317-70-11-3105PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Meulemans G, Gonze M, Carlier MC, Petit P, Burny A, Long L: Protective effects of HN and F glycoprotein-specific monoclonal antibodies on experimental Newcastle disease. Avian Pathol 1986, 15: 761-768. 10.1080/03079458608436338PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Shengqing Y, Kishida N, Ito H, Kida H, Otsuki K, Kawaoka Y, Ito T: Generation of velogenic Newcastle disease viruses from a nonpathogenic waterfowl isolate by passaging in chickens. Virology 2002, 301: 206-211. 10.1006/viro.2002.1539PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Alexander DJ, Campbell G, Manvell RJ, Collins MS, Parsons G, McNulty MS: Characterisation of an antigenically unusual virus responsible for two outbreaks of Newcastle disease in the Republic of Ireland in 1990. Vet Rec 1992, 130: 65-68. 10.1136/vr.130.4.65PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Gould AR, Kattenbelt JA, Selleck P, Hansson E, Della-Porta A, Westbury HA: Virulent Newcastle disease in Australia: molecular epidemiological analysis of viruses isolated prior to and during the outbreaks of 1998–2000. Virus Res 2001, 77: 51-60. 10.1016/S0168-1702(01)00265-9PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Miller PJ, King DJ, Afonso CL, Suarez DL: Antigenic differences among Newcastle disease virus strains of different genotypes used in vaccine formulation affect viral shedding after a virulent challenge. Vaccine 2007, 25: 7238-7246. 10.1016/j.vaccine.2007.07.017PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Kim LM, King DJ, Guzman H, Tesh RB, da Rosa AP T, Bueno R Jr, Dennett JA, Afonso CL: Biological and phylogenetic characterization of pigeon paramyxovirus serotype 1 circulating in wild North American pigeons and doves. J Clin Microbiol 2008, 46: 3303-3310. 10.1128/JCM.00644-08PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Wu S, Wang W, Yao C, Wang X, Hu S, Cao J, Wu Y, Liu W, Liu X: Genetic diversity of Newcastle disease viruses isolated from domestic poultry species in Eastern China during 2005–2008. Arch Virol 2010, 156: 253-261. 10.1007/s00705-010-0851-5View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Tamura K, Kumar S: Evolutionary distance estimation under heterogeneous substitution pattern among lineages. Mol Biol Evol 2002, 19: 1727-1736. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a003995PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Alexander DJ: Manual of diagnostic tests and vaccines for terrestrial animals, Office of International Des Epizooties. Volume 5th edition. World Organisation for Animal Health, Paris; 2004.Google Scholar

Copyright

© Zhu et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.