Skip to main content

Screening and functional analysis of differentially expressed genes in EBV-transformed lymphoblasts



Epstain-Barr virus (EBV) can transform human B lymphocytes making them immortalized and inducing tumorigenic ability in vitro, but the molecular mechanisms remain unclear. The aim of the present study is to detect and analyze differentially expressed genes in two types of host cells, normal human lymphocytes and coupled EBV-transformed lymphoblasts in vitro using gene chips, and to screen the key regulatory genes of lymphocyte transformation induced by EB virus.


Fresh peripheral blood samples from seven healthy donors were collected. EBV was used to transform lymphocytes in vitro. Total RNA was extracted from 7 cases of the normal lymphocytes and transformed lymphoblasts respectively, marked with dihydroxyfluorane after reverse transcription, then hybridized with 4 × 44 K Agilent human whole genome microarray. LIMMA, String, Cytoscape and other softwares were used to screen and analyze differentially expressed genes. Real-time PCR was applied to verify the result of gene expression microarrays.


There were 1745 differentially expressed genes that had been screened, including 917 up-regulated genes and 828 down-regulated genes. According to the results of Generank, String and Cytoscape analyses, 38 genes may be key controlled genes related to EBV-transformed lymphocytes, including 22 up-regulated genes(PLK1, E2F1, AURKB, CDK2, PLCG2, CD80, PIK3R3, CDC20, CDC6, AURKA, CENPA, BUB1B, NUP37, MAD2L1, BIRC5, CDC25A, CCNB1, RPA3, HJURP, KIF2C, CDK1, CDCA8) and 16 down-regulated genes(FYN, CD3D, CD4, CD3G, ZAP70, FOS, HCK, CD247, PRKCQ, ITK, LCP2, CXCL1, CD8A, ITGB5, VAV3, CXCR4), which primarily control biological processes such as cell cycle, mitosis, cytokine-cytokine pathway, immunity response and so on.


Human lymphocyte transformation induced by EB virus is a complicated process, involving multiple-genes and –pathways in virus-host interactions. Global gene expression profile analysis showed that EBV may transform human B lymphocytes by promoting cell cycle and mitosis, inhibiting cell apoptosis, hindering host immune function and secretion of cytokines.


Epstain-Barr virus (EBV) is closely associated with many kinds of human tumors, including nasopharyngeal carcinoma, Burkitt lymphoma, Hodgkin's lymphoma, post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders (PTLD) and others [13]. EBV can localize to B cells during latent infections, since cells in this phase only express EBV latent proteins with weak immunogenicity, thereby inhibiting the body’s ability to recognize and eliminate EBV-infected cells. Under certain conditions and the actions of some inducing factors, the latent infecting EBV is reactivated, which can induce abnormal proliferation or transformation of B cells, and might induce the genesis of EBV associated tumors in some cases [1].

EBV can transform human B lymphocytes making them immortalized and inducing tumorigenic ability in vitro[4], but the molecular mechanisms remain unclear. In this study, normal peripheral blood lymphocytes (PBLs) and coupled EBV transformed lymphoblastoid cell lines (LCLs) were used as experimental models to screen and compare the differentially expressed genes of the two types of host cells in vitro, using human whole genome microarrays, which possess different characteristics and the same genetic background, and to analyze the biological functions and interactions. Molecular regulatory networks for EBV-induced human lymphocyte transformation were constructed to reveal the key genes involved in the malignant transformation of EBV-infected lymphocytes.

Materials and methods

Preparation of EBV suspension

B95-8 cells with well-defined morphologies were selected, and the cell concentration was adjusted to 106-7/ml after the last change of culture medium. Cells were then incubated at 37°C and 5% CO2 incubator for 7 ~ 10 d. The cultured solution was collected on the 10th day, and centrifuged at 4000 r/min and 4°C for 30 min. The supernatant was filtered through 0.45 μm microporous membranes, subpackaged and sealed in freezing tubes and stored at −80°C.

Establishment of LCLs

Fresh peripheral blood samples from seven healthy adult donors were collected. Detection of EBV-VCA-IgG kit (ELISA) for the serum and PCR amplification of EBV-LMP1 in the whole blood DNA were used to verify EBV infection status of the seven blood donors. All of the seven donors were EBV-positive.

Normal PBLs were separated from fresh peripheral blood samples using human lymphocyte separation medium (Cat #LTS1077, Tian Jin Hao Yang Biological Manufacture Co., Ltd.) and washed twice with RPMI 1640. A portion of the obtained PBLs were lysed with Trizol (Invitrogen, USA) and preserved at −80°C, whereas the remaining PBLs were used for EBV transformation according to the method described by David [5]. Briefly, 2 ~ 3 × 106 normal PBLs were resuspended in RPMI 1640 which contained 2 ml cyclosporine A ([Sandoz], with a final concentration of 2 μg/ml) and 25% fetal bovine serum, and then inoculated to two wells of a 24-well plate. One ml of EBV suspension was added to each well. A week later, lymphoblastoid-like changes in cell morphology, volume enlarging, and cell aggregation were observed. One-half of the cultivating mediums were exchanged every 3 ~ 4 d. After four weeks, the cells were transferred to a 25 ml culture bottle for subculturing. Resuscitation activity of seven samples of transformed cells that were stored in liquid nitrogen for four weeks was well, and could be used for continuous subculturing. The successfully transformed LCLs were lysed with Trizol and stored at −80°C.

Screening and analysis of differentially expressed genes

Total RNA was extracted from seven cases of the normal lymphocytes and transformed lymphoblasts, respectively, marked with dihydroxyfluorane after reverse transcription, then hybridized with Agilent whole genome microarray (Design ID. 14850). Agilent whole genome microarray and hybridization experiment were provided and completed by Kangchen Bio-tech Inc (Shanghai, China). Agilent whole genome microarray included 41000 genes. Sixty-mer oligonucleotide probes were manufactured using a computer-driven inkjet printing process with Sureprint technology. Probe designed was based on database resources including Genbank, Ensemble and others, and was screened and optimized following well-tested protocols. The microarrays were scanned using Agilent Microarray Scanner (G2505B), with Agilent Feature Extraction and Agilent Genepix GX software. LIMMA was used to screen differentially expressed genes. Cluster 3.0 and Tree View software were used for cluster analyses. GO and Pathway software were used for analysis of gene function. Generank was used for gene ranking, and String and Cytoscape software were used to draw genetic interaction network.

Real-time PCR verification

Four genes of interest were randomly selected from differentially expressed genes screened in the above experiments. Real-time PCR was performed with GADPH as an internal control to verify the microarray results. Primer sequences (5'-3') were as follows: E2F1: upstream GAACTGGGCTGCCGAGGT, downstream AGGACGTTGGTGATGTCATAGAT; PLK1: upstream CAAGTGGGTGGACTATTCGGA, downstream CATTGTAGAGGATGAGGCGTGT; BIRC5: upstream GAGTCCCTGGCTCCTCTACTG, downstream TCACTGGGCCTGTCTAATTCAC; FYN: upstream GGAAGGAGATTGGTGGGAA, downstream CACGGATAGAAAGTGAATAGGC; GADPH: upstream GGGAAACTGTGGCGTGAT, downstream GAGTGGGTGTCGCTGTTGA. Both normal lymphocytes and transformed lymphoblasts were verified for seven samples, and each experiment was repeated three times.


EBV-transformed lymphoblastes

Morphological observation of successfully transformed LCLs by inverted microscopy showed that cells were rounded with obviously enlarged volumes, in which some cells showed filiform antenna or pseudopods, clustered and suspended growth. Occasionally tens or hundreds of cells aggregated into cluster [5], and could be subcultured in vitro infinitely (Figure 1). RT-PCR results of EBV-LMP1 of each cases of the LCLs derived from the seven donors was positive.

Figure 1

EBV-transformed lymphoblasts in vitro (×200). The volumes of successfully transformed lymphoblasts were significantly enlarged, rounded or ellipsed, where some had filiform antenna or pseudopodia. Cells aggregated into clusters and could be subcultured in vitro infinitely.

Screening of differentially expressed genes

Microarray hybridization signal scanning showed that fluorescence signaling was strong and uniform, quality control was good, signal to noise ratio was low and the signal intensity reflected the RNA expression of the samples. All the raw data was standardized by robust quantile, then LIMMA software with false positive rate less than 0.0001 and two-fold changes in differential expression as a standard was used in screening genes. Results showed that there were 1,745 significantly differentially expressed genes in each of the seven samples, including 917 up-regulated genes and 828 down-regulated genes.

Biological function analysis of differentially expressed genes

Hierarchical cluster analysis of differentially expressed genes showed that the genes ultimately clustered into two major branches, which indicated that the differentially expressed genes were well distinguished between normal PBLs and LCLs, and there existed significant difference between the expression patterns of two kinds of host cell genes (Figure 2A).

Figure 2

Heatmap of differentially expressed genes. (A) Heatmap of 1745 differentially expressed genes. Norms 1 ~ 7: normal lymphocytes 1 ~ 7, Trans 1 ~ 7: EBV-transformed lymphoblasts 1 ~ 7. Dendrograms showed that the differentially expressed genes ultimately clustered into two major branches, which indicated that the differentially expressed genes could distinguish normal PBLs and LCLs, and there existed significant difference between the expression patterns of two kinds of host cell genes. (B) Heatmap of 38 key controled genes. the 38 genes also clustered into two major branches, including 22 up-regulated genes and 16 down-regulated genes, and the expression of each genes can be notified. Up-regulated genes were labeled in red, down-regulated genes were labeled in green, genes showed no significant expression difference were labeled in black both in A and B.

Drawing and analysis of differentially expressed genes interaction networks. Differentially expressed genes were weight-sequenced according to the Generank algorithm (Table 1). Generank was based on the premise that nodes with more multiple of differentially expression and joint-edges have more important biological function [6, 7]. Therefore, genes with the more advanced rankings were more biologically important in the process of EBV-transformation of lymphocytes. The 1,745 differentially expressed genes were mapped to the "experiment" and "database" sublibraries using String online software, and the Confidence Score was set at a high confidence level of 700. Results showed that there existed interactions among 350 nodes with a total of 1,292 joint-edges, and there were 88 nodes with ≥ 10 joint-edges, including 1051 joint-edges, accounting for 81% of the total, which suggested that the 88 genes may have important functions in EBV-transformed B lymphocytes (Figure 3). Among these 88 nodes, 38 were either ranked in the top 100 up-regulated genes or the top 100 down-regulated genes in Generank rank, which included 22 up-regulated genes and 16 down-regulated genes (Figure 2B). Annotation and analysis results of Genecards and Pathway showed that the up-regulated genes were mainly related to cell cycle, mitosis, DNA replication, and apoptosis regulation, whereas the down-regulated genes were mainly related to immunocyte activation, MHC-II/TCR/BCR expression and interaction, and cytokine interaction (Table 1).

Table 1 Functional annotation of 38 differentially expressed genes
Figure 3

Interaction networks maps of differentially expressed genes. Up-regulated genes were labeled in red, down-regulated genes were labeled in green. labeled genes had ≥ 10 joint-edges, labeled nodes were the 38 genes that ranked the top 100 of up-regulated genes or the top 100 of down-regulated genes in the Generank rank. There were 88 nodes with ≥ 10 joint-edges in the map, including 1051 joint-edges, which accounted for 81% of the total.

Results of real-time PCR verification

Real-time PCR results showed that trends in expression change for the randomly selected four genes were consistent with the microarray results. PLK1, E2F1, BIRC5 showed a high expression level in LCLs, and low expression in FYN (Table 2), verifying that the microarray results were accurate and reliable.

Table 2 Results of real-time PCR verification


The accumulation of high-throughput gene and protein expression profile data has greatly promoted the application of computer science and technology in functional gene studies. However, complex biological functions are not simply controlled by a single gene, as certain biological processes are realized by the cooperation of a series of genes. In this study, normal peripheral blood lymphocytes (PBLs) and coupled EBV-transformed lymphoblastoid cell lines (LCLs) were analyzed using Agilent human whole genome microarrays, in which 1,745 differentially expressed genes were screened. Our results indicated that EBV-induced human lymphocyte transformation was a process involving multiple genes and pathways in virus-host interactions. Hierarchical clustering analysis of the 1,745 differentially expressed genes showed that they were well distinguished between normal PBLs and LCLs, as there were significant differences between the expression patterns of the two types of host cells. There were 88 differentially expressed genes with ≥ 10 joint-edges, accounted for 81% of the total jonit-edges, which suggested that these genes may play an important role in the process of EBV transformation of B lymphocytes.

Cell cycle and mitosis promoted differentially expressed genes

Viral genes can induce changes in the cell cycle of the host cell during the immortalization of B lymphocytes by EBV [8]. EBV latent proteins can up-regulate cyclin D1 expression in host cell, initiate the cell cycle and promote the G1-S phase transition through several signaling pathways [9, 10]. EBV can also induce the up-regulation of CDK2 and CDK1 in the host cell [11]. CDK2 not only acted on the boundary of G1/S phase, but also had a key regulatory effect on S phase progression and DNA synthesis. CDK1 could promote the end of S phase and start G2 phase. The cyclin B1/CDK1 complex triggered G2/M phase transition and promoted mitosis to enter into anaphase. The activation of CDK2 was dependent on the regulation of transcription factor E2F. Research has shown that EBNA-6 and EBV transcription activation factor Zta and Rta could induce up-regulation of E2F1 in the host cell [12, 13]. Annotation of differentially expressed genes and signal pathway analyses showed that up-regulated genes (CDC6, RPA3, etc.) participated in the initiation of DNA replication and DNA recombination. Therefore, we presumed that EBV might promote the progression of the cell cycle, induce B lymphocyte transformation and obtain infinite proliferation ability through up-regulating of certain cell cycle related genes.

Lacoste et al (2010) found that chromosome rearrangement might occur in subcultured early phase EBV-LCLs, mainly including chromosome deletion, chromosome fragments, dicentric chromosomes and unbalanced chromosome translocation, and aneuploidy variation may occur during the 12th week post-infection [14], suggesting that EBV can induce unstable variation of the host cell genome. Gruhne et al (2009) confirmed that EBNA-1 induced DNA damage, LMP-1 inhibited DNA repair and apoptosis regulation, and EBNA-3 C down-regulated BubR1 transcription resulting host cell released CDC20 and then passived spindle checkpiont [15]. Pan et al (2009) showed that the cell spindle checkpoint could be disturbed by EBNA2 through down-regulation of MAD2 and up-regulation of PLK1, resulting in unstable chromosome variation [16]. Up-regulation of several spindle checkpoint related genes were observed in this study, including PLK1, AURKA, AURKB, NUP37, CENPA, BUB1B, CDCA8 and others. Considering that cell aneuploidy variation was mostly induced by disruption in the spindle checkpoint [17], we presumed that EBV might up-regulate the expression of a series of spindle checkpoint related genes, thus inducing change in the stability of the genome, as well as inducing B lymphocyte cell transformation and abnormal proliferation.

Cell apoptosis inhibited differentially expressed genes

Abnormal cell proliferation has a close relation with disordered apoptosis regulation. Ng Siok-Bian et al [18] reported that LMP1 could activate NF-κB and MYC to mediate the high expression of the BIRC5 (Survivin), an inhibitor of apoptosis protein, in extranodal nasal-type NK/T cell lymphoma cells. However, LU et al [19] proposed that EBNA1 formed a complex with Sp1 or Sp1-like protein, and the cis-element of the complex combined with the BIRC5 promoter induced the up-regulation of BIRC5. In addition, Ando et al [20] reported that there existed a sequence-specific PLK1 binding region in P53, where PLK1 inhibited the transcription activity and apoptosis regulation ability of p53 by binding to this region. The high expression of BIRC5 and PLK1 in LCLs in this study suggested that EBV can inhibit B cell apoptosis and impel cell immortalization through multiple ways.

Host immune function hindered differentially expressed genes

Among the EBV-induced down-regulated genes, several were involved in T/B cell activation of the host, suggesting that EBV regulated changes in immune function of the host during transformation of B cells. A microarray experiment conducted by Sengupta et al [21] confirmed that EBV could limit the expression of MHC-I chain-related genes in nasopharyngeal carcinoma cells. Rovedo et al [22] showed that LMP2A can bind to the SH-2 functional domain of FYN and block normal BCR signal transduction. The binding of FYN specific sequences and CD3 is required for T cell activation [23]. Gene function annotation showed that down-regulated genes, such as CD3D, CD4, CD3G, ZAP70, LCP2, ITK, etc., were involved in immunocytes activation and immune-related signal pathways, suggesting that EBV may inhibit the expression of these genes to hinder the normal immune surveillance and clearance of the host, which may allow virus-infected cells to evade immune surveillance, and ultimately induce the transformation or even malignancy of EBV-infected cells. Our previous experiments have confirmed that human-derived B-cell lymphoma could be induced in SCID mice transplanted with EBV seropositive donor’s lymphocytes [24, 25], which supported the hypothesis that EBV-induced lymphomas were related to immune suppression or deficiency.

EBV BZLF1 is the switch for EBV latent state into lytic state. The expression of the BZLF1 gene is initiated from the promoter Zp, which is normally suppressed in EBV-transformed B cell. Liang et al [26] demonstrated BZLF1 gene can be activated by TGF-β through the cooperation of Smad3/Smad4 and c-Jun/c-Fos that formed a complex. The proto-oncogene product c-Fos is a component of the transcription factor AP-1. Mao et al [27] demonstrated fos protein was rarely expressed in the primary cutaneous B-cell lymphoma (PCBCL), and the result of KEGG pathway analysis showed that fos participate in B/T cell receptor signalling pathway. In this study, we hypothesized EBV may down-regulated fos to maintain its latent infection and to evade host immune surveillance and ultimately lead to the transformation of B lymphocytes.

It is noteworthy that other studies had showed that EBV could change cytokine secretion of the host cell, thereby inhibiting normal immune function, and was also an important regulatory factor for the transformation or malignant change of the B lymphocytes induced by EBV. Ehlin-Henriksson et al [28] indicated that EBNA2 and LMP1 can down-regulate the expression of CXCR4 in B-cell lymphoma cells. Chen et al [29] confirmed that EBNA-3B inhibited the expression of CXCR4 in EBV-infected B cells, thus affecting the B-cell homing and disturbing the normal immune barrier of the host. Down-regulation of cytokine-related genes-CXCR4 and CXCL1 in LCLs were also observed in this study. Therefore, we presumed that the change in expression of cytokine-related genes induced by EBV was also a regulatory factor in hindering host immune function and transformation of B lymphocytes.

In summary, EBV-induced B lymphocyte transformation was a complicated process, which involved many genes and pathways changes between virus and host interaction. Global gene expression profile analysis showed that there existed significant differences in the gene expression patterns between LCLs and normal host lymphocytes, and EBV may induce the transformation of human B lymphocytes by promoting cell cycle and mitosis, inhibiting cell apoptosis, regulating cytokine secretion, and hindering normal immune function. Our present results filtered out 38 key regulatory genes. The function and specific effect in EBV-transformed lymphocytes of the these key regulatory genes screened from EBV-transformed lymphoblastoid cell lines (LCLs) need to be further studied. This study provided important information on the molecular mechanism of lymphocyte transformation by EBV, and laid a foundation for subsequent gene validation and functional studies.



Epstein-Barr virus


peripheral blood lymphocytes


lymphoblastoid cell lines


normal lymphocytes


transformed lymphoblasts.


  1. 1.

    Carbone A, Gloghini A, Dotti G: EBV-associated lymphoroliferative disorders: classification and treatment. Oncologist 2008,13(5):577-585. 10.1634/theoncologist.2008-0036

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Baumforth KR, Young LS, Flavell KJ, Constandinou C, Murray PG: The Epstein-Barr virus and its association with human cancers. Mol Pathol 1999,52(6):307-322. 10.1136/mp.52.6.307

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Zhang Y, Peng J, Tang Y, He J, Peng J, Zhao Q, He R, Xie X, Peng X, Gan R: The prevalence of Epstein-Barr virus infection in different types and sites of lymphomas. Jpn J Infect Dis 2010,63(2):132-135.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Sugimoto M, Tahara H, Ide T, Furuichi Y: Steps involved in immortalization and tumorigenesis in human B-lymphoblastoid cell lines transformed by Epstein-Barr virus. Cancer Res 2004,64(10):3361-3364. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-0079

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Spector DL, Goldman RD, Leinwand LA: Cells: A Laboratory Manual. 1st edition. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, New York; 1998:71-77.

    Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Luscombe NM, Babu MM, Yu H, Snyder M, Teichmann SA, Gerstein M: Genomic analysis of regulatory network dynamics reveals large topological changes. Nature 2004,431(7006):308-312. 10.1038/nature02782

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Khalyfa A, Gharib SA, Kim J, Dayyat E, Snow AB, Bhattacharjee R, Kheirandish-Gozal L, Goldman JL, Gozal D: Transcriptomic analysis identifies phosphatases as novel targets for adenotonsillar hypertrophy of pediatric obstructive sleep apnea. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2010,181(10):1114-1120. 10.1164/rccm.200909-1398OC

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Klein G, Klein E, Kashuba E: Interaction of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) with human B-lymphocytes. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2010,396(1):67-73. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2010.02.146

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Saha A, Halder S, Upadhyay SK, Lu J, Kumar P, Murakami M, Cai Q, Robertson ES: Epstein-Barr virus nuclear antigen 3 C facilitates G1-S transition by stabilizing and enhancing the function of cyclin D1. PLoS Pathog 2011,7(2):e1001275. 10.1371/journal.ppat.1001275

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Zhang W, Zeng Z, Zhou Y, Xiong W, Fan S, Xiao L, Huang D, Li Z, Li D, Wu M, Li X, Shen S, Wang R, Cao L, Tang K, Li G: Identification of aberrant cell cycle regulation in Epstein-Barr virus-associated nasopharyngeal carcinoma by cDNA microarray and gene set enrichment analysis. Acta Biochim Biophys Sin (Shanghai) 2009,41(5):414-428. 10.1093/abbs/gmp025

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    O'Nions J, Allday MJ: Deregulation of the cell cycle by the Epstein-Barr virus. Adv Cancer Res 2004, 92: 119-186.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Guo Q, Qian L, Guo L, Shi M, Chen C, Lv X, Yu M, Hu M, Jiang G, Guo N: Transactivators Zta and Rta of Epstein-Barr virus promote G0/G1 to S transition in Raji cells: a novel relationship between lytic virus and cell cycle. Mol Immuno 2010,47(9):1783-1792. 10.1016/j.molimm.2010.02.017

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Kashuba E, Yurchenko M, Yenamandra SP, Snopok B, Isaguliants M, Szekely L, Klein G: EBV-encoded EBNA-6 binds and targets MRS18-2 to the nucleus, resulting in the disruption of pRb-E2F1 complexes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2008,105(14):5489-5494. 10.1073/pnas.0801053105

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Lacoste S, Wiechec E, Dos Santos Silva AG, Guffei A, Williams G, Lowbeer M, Benedek K, Henriksson M, Klein G, Mai S: Chromosomal rearrangements after ex vivo Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection of human B cells. Oncogene 2010,29(4)):503-515.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Gruhne B, Kamranvar SA, Masucci MG, Sompallae R: EBV and genomic instability–a new look at the role of the virus in the pathogenesis of Burkitt's lymphoma. Semin Cancer Biol 2009,19(6):394-400. 10.1016/j.semcancer.2009.07.005

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Pan SH, Tai CC, Lin CS, Hsu WB, Chou SF, Lai CC, Chen JY, Tien HF, Lee FY, Wang WB: Epstein-Barr virus nuclear antigen 2 disrupts mitotic checkpoint and causes chromosomal instability. Carcinogenesis 2009,30(2):366-375.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    McIntosh JR: Structural and mechanical control of mitotic progression. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol 1991, 56: 613-619. 10.1101/SQB.1991.056.01.070

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Ng SB, Selvarajan V, Huang G, Zhou J, Feldman AL, Law M, Kwong YL, Shimizu N, Kagami Y, Aozasa K, Salto-Tellez M, Chng WJ: Activated oncogenic pathways and therapeutic targets in extranodal nasal-type NK/T cell lymphoma revealed by gene expression profiling. J Pathol 2011,223(4):496-510. 10.1002/path.2823

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Lu J, Murakami M, Verma SC, Cai Q, Haldar S, Kaul R, Wasik MA, Middeldorp J, Robertson ES: Epstein-Barr Virus nuclear antigen 1 (EBNA1) confers resistance to apoptosis in EBV-positive B-lymphoma cells through up-regulation of survivin. Virology 2011,410(1):64-75. 10.1016/j.virol.2010.10.029

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Ando K, Ozaki T, Yamamoto H, Furuya K, Hosoda M, Hayashi S, Fukuzawa M, Nakagawara A: Polo-like Kinase 1 (Plk1) Inhibits p53 Function by Physical Interaction and Phosphorylation. J Biol Chem 2004,279(24):25549-25561. 10.1074/jbc.M314182200

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Sengupta S, den Boon JA, Chen IH, Newton MA, Dahl DB, Chen M, Cheng YJ, Westra WH, Chen CJ, Hildesheim A, Sugden B, Ahlquist P: Genome-wide expression profiling reveals EBV-associated inhibition of MHC class I expression in nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Cancer Res 2006,66(16):7999-8006. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-4399

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Rovedo M, Longnecker R: Epstein-Barr Virus Latent Membrane Protein 2A Preferentially Signals through the Src Family Kinase Lyn. J Virol 2008,82(17):8520-8528. 10.1128/JVI.00843-08

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Filby A, Seddon B, Kleczkowska J, Salmond R, Tomlinson P, Smida M, Lindquist JA, Schraven B, Zamoyska R: Fyn regulates the duration of TCR engagement needed for commitment to effector function. J Immunol 2007,179(7):4635-4644.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Gan R, Yin Z, Liu T, Wang L, Tang Y, Song Y: Cyclosporine A effectively inhibits graft-versus-host disease during development of Epstein-Barr virus-infected human B cell lymphoma in SCID mouse. Cancer Sci 2003,94(9):796-801. 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2003.tb01521.x

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Gan R, Xie X, He J, Liu X, Hong L, Tang Y, Liu F, Xie H: Gene analysis of Epstein-Barr virus-associated lymphomas in hu-PBL/SCID chimeras. Tumori 2010,96(3):465-472.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Liang CL, Chen JL, Hsu YP, Ou JT, Chang YS: Epstein-Barr virus BZLF1 gene is activated by transforming growth factor-beta through cooperativity of Smads and c-Jun/c-Fos proteins. J Biol Chem 2002,277(26):23345-23357. 10.1074/jbc.M107420200

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Mao X, Orchard G: Abnormal AP-1 protein expression in primary cutaneous B-cell lymphomas. Br J Dermatol 2008,159(1):145-151. 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2008.08579.x

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Ehlin-Henriksson B, Liang W, Cagigi A, Mowafi F, Klein G, Nilsson A: Changes in chemokines and chemokine receptor expression on tonsillar B cells upon Epstein-Barr virus infection. Immunology 2009,127(4):549-557. 10.1111/j.1365-2567.2008.03029.x

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Chen A, Zhao B, Kieff E, Aster JC, Wang F: EBNA-3B- and EBNA-3 C-regulated cellular genes in Epstein-Barr virus-immortalized lymphoblastoid cell lines. J Virol 2006,80(20):10139-10150. 10.1128/JVI.00854-06

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant 81071620, grant 81072198), and Foundation of the Construct Program of the Key Discipline in Hunan Province (2011–76).

Author information



Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Runliang Gan or Yimou Wu.

Additional information

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors' contributions

DY and TY carried out the establishment of LCLs, participated in the analysis of differentially expressed genes and drafted the manuscript. DY and HF performed the bioinformatic analysis of differentially expressed genes. ZY and CA carried out the cell culture and preparation of EBV suspension. GR and WY conceived of the study, and participated in its design and coordination. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Authors’ original submitted files for images

Below are the links to the authors’ original submitted files for images.

Authors’ original file for figure 1

Authors’ original file for figure 2

Authors’ original file for figure 3

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dai, Y., Tang, Y., He, F. et al. Screening and functional analysis of differentially expressed genes in EBV-transformed lymphoblasts. Virol J 9, 77 (2012).

Download citation


  • Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)
  • Lymphocyte transformation
  • Lymphoblastoid cell line (LCL)
  • Gene expression
  • Gene chip