Open Access

Revised cutoff values of ALT and HBV DNA level can better differentiate HBeAg (-) chronic inactive HBV patients from active carriers

  • Bushra Ijaz1Email author,
  • Waqar Ahmad1,
  • Fouzia T Javed2,
  • Sana Gull1 and
  • Sajida Hassan1
Virology Journal20118:86

https://doi.org/10.1186/1743-422X-8-86

Received: 1 February 2011

Accepted: 27 February 2011

Published: 27 February 2011

Abstract

Background and Aims

ELISA is still used as primary test for diagnosis HBV disease. However, ELISA-positive patients were marked as HBV inactive after confirmation with PCR and vice versa. Our aim was to assess the performance of new cut-off value of ALT, HBV DNA load and significance of AST as screening tool for HBeAg (-) chronic active or inactive patients in Pakistani population.

Materials and methods

In a cross-sectional, cohort study, 567 HBeAg (-) patients followed for one year were selected. Patients with persistent elevated ALT than normal and HBV DNA ≥ 100,000 copies/mL were taken as active chronic. Diagnostic values for ALT, AST and HBV DNA load in HBV HBeAg (-) chronic active and inactive patients compared using receiver operation characteristic (ROC) curves.

Results

Of 567 HBeAg (-) patients, 228 were classified as chronic inactive and 339 as active. HBV infection was dominant in male. Serum ALT, AST and HBV DNA levels showed significant and high AUROC to differentiate chronic HBeAg (-) inactive patients from active. AUROC for Serum ALT, AST and HBV DNA were observed 0.997, 0.969 and 1.000, respectively. For revised cut off value for ALT (30 IU/L for male and 19 IU/L for female) and HBV DNA load ≥100,000 copies/mL, a PPV of 97%, NPV of 94%, a sensitivity of 98%, and a specificity of 92% was observed to discriminate active carriers from inactive carriers. We also observed 93.5% specificity, 83.1% sensitivity, 82% PPV and 89.5% NPV for AST ≤20 IU/L to differentiate inactive carriers from active ones in our study group.

Conclusions

Revised cut off value of ALT and NIH derived HBV DNA value can better discriminate between HBeAg (-) chronic active and inactive patients.

Introduction

Almost 170-200 million of the world population is infected with HBV, leading to world's most common cancer "Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)", causing nearly one million deaths per year. Approximately, 20% of chronic HBV patients have eventually progressed to liver cirrhosis, and some infections have evolved into HCC in a substantial number of patients [1, 2].

The most common contradiction in diagnosis of HBV patients is the differentiation of chronic active cases from the inactive carriers, as they share same serological profile. Diagnosis of disease outcome in these patients with PCR and HBV DNA levels assay, and defining the state of infection with these tools is emerging during last decade [35]. However, in many countries and regions like United States, Western Europe and other high or middle income countries, ELISA is still used and majority of the positive tests are not confirmed by PCR. It is interesting to note that many HBeAg (-) patients showed presence of chronic active HBV in further screening by PCR and vice versa [6]. To differentiate active chronic HBV from inactive carrier state, an arbitrary serum HBV DNA level of 100000 copies/mL has been proposed by the United States national Institute of health (NIH) [7]. During HBV disease progression, after seroconversion (HBeAg (+) to HBeAg (-), HBeAg consists of two clinical forms; one known as chronic inactive with low persistant aminotransferase levels and HBV DNA levels (≤ 100,000 copies/ml) and second with no HBeAg, high ALT and HBV DNA levels (≥ 100,000 copies/ml). In low-income countries like Pakistan, many patients refused to do PCR and liver biopsy procedure due to poverty and cost of these tests. Beside these challenges, the growing concern is the early detection of viral hepatic disease and liver damage. For this purpose, in routine laboratory tests, elevated alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels are used as indicators of liver cell injury and as non-invasive diagnostic tests [8]. Elevated AST levels are usually predominant in liver cirrhosis with increased ALT levels [9, 10]. During assessment of liver disease due to hepatitis, serum AST and ALT levels are most commonly used serum markers to detect acute and chronic hepatocytes cytotoxicity [1113]. Now a days, the main emphasis of workers is early detection of liver damage due to chronic HBV, however, there is always questions about the effectiveness of these test because of their low sensitivity [14, 15]. Several studies in Italy, China, Korea and Hong Kong showed that ALT levels higher than the normal limits are strongly associated with an increased risk of liver cirrhosis in HBV infected patients [1619]. Recent studies revealed that in patients with HBeAg (-), high ALT levels greater than 0.5x to the upper limit of normal (ULN) relate to advance fibrosis and ALT > 30 IU/L and 19 IU/L in male and female respectively, with base line HBV DNA levels > 100000 copies/ml; can better differentiate between active chronic HBV patients from inactive chronic carriers [11, 12, 2022]. While, Degertekin et al. proposed HBV DNA cutoff values of 5000 copies/mL to differentiate between active chronic HBV patients from inactive chronic carriers [23]. These studies indicates ALT level as a reliable serum marker leading to fact that HBV natural history can vary from one population to another [24]. Therefore, we should determine more reliable cutoff value for serum ALT and AST levels to predict active HBV patients according to our population.

The aim of our study was to assess the relationship between HBV DNA load, AST and ALT levels in HBeAg (-) patients, review the performance of serum ALT and HBV DNA levels as the screening tool for liver disease and to find whether new cutoff values of ALT and HBV DNA are able to predict HBV infection in Pakistani population. The need of PCR and invasive procedure liver biopsy may be eradicated if the serum biochemical marker ALT with high positive or negative predictive values of HBeAg (-) patients can be obtained and thus minimize the cost of PCR and therapy time.

Material and methods

Patients

Patients of this study were the native Pakistani people referred to Pathology department, Jinnah Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan, for biochemical and serological tests. This retrospective cross-sectional study was carried out from March 2008 to September 2009 with collaboration of National Centre of Excellence in Molecular Biology, University of the Punjab, Lahore, Pakistan. Blood samples (10 mL) collected from each patient tested for HBsAg and HBeAg by ELISA. All patients did not have any history about HBV vaccination or disease infection, and/or other type of hepatitis. The routine liver function tests (LFTs) were estimated for each patient in hospital laboratory. Patients with positive serology and/or positive test for HBV alone and no evidence of liver failure were included in this study. Informed consents were obtained from patients containing their bio data and lab results. This study was approved by the Institutional ethics committee.

Laboratory assays

Test for HBsAg and HBeAg were done by using ELISA kits (Abbot Diagnostics). Serum ALT and AST levels were measured by using commercially available Hitachi-7600 series automatic analyzer. The normal limits considered for ALT was 40 IU/L and for AST 35 IU/L. Serum HBV DNA was evaluated by using commercially available polymerase chain reaction assay (Amplicor HBV Moniter test; Roche Diagnostic System, Inc., Branchburg, New Jersey) with lower limit of detection 80 copies/mL and accurate range 500-200,000 copies/mL according to manufacturer protocol.

Selected patients were HBeAg (-) with base line ALT determined at first visit. Patients ALT levels were determined four times every three months. Patients were divided into two groups as inactive (A) and active (B) chronic carriers based on HBeAg absence, liver diagnosis by ultrsonography, persistent ALT levels and HBV DNA load. Patients with ≥ 100000 HBV DNA copies/mL and continual elevated ALT levels were considered as active chronic carriers.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using the statistical package for social studies (SPSS) version 16 for windows. Student t-test and chi-square tests were applied to evaluate differences in proportions. P value <0.05 was considered significant. Univariate analysis includes the variables age, HBV DNA levels, ALT and AST. Gender and PCR results were taken as independent categorical factors. Spearman correlation was used to assess the association between two quantitative variables. The diagnostic validity of serum ALT, AST and HBV DNA load and their combination were tested for classification of HBeAg (-) patients into active and inactive chronic patients. ROC curves were drawn for predicting values of ALT, AST and ALT at specific cut off values. Cutoff values for AST and ALT were 40 and 35 IU/L for each respectively, while for HBV DNA cut off values were 2000, 5000, 20,000, 50,000 and 100,000 copies/mL, respectively. New cut off values with high sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV were also predicted.

Results

Patient's clinical characteristics

A total of 567 HBeAg (-) patients were selected for this study. Patient's data is given in Table 1. The mean age of the patients was 32.20 ± 11.9. Of 567 patients, 228 were classified into HBeAg (-) chronic inactive, while remaining 339 were active. The age difference between both groups was not significant (P = 0.181). Male were dominant in both groups. Out of 228 inactive and 339 active patients, 58 and 114 were female respectively (P = 0.038). Among 170 chronic inactive male, 168 have ALT < 30IU/L; while 51 chronic inactive female out of 58, have ALT < 19 IU/L. Regarding AST levels, 225 inactive and 74 active carriers have their AST levels < 35 IU/L. Baseline ALT and AST values were significantly higher in HBeAg (-) chronic active patients (P < 0.05).
Table 1

Clinical characteristics of HBsAg positive patients

Patients characteristics

Inactive carriers n = 228

Active carriers n = 339

P-value

M/F

170/58

225/114

0.038

Age

31.3 ± 12.1

32.75 ± 11.7

0.181

ALT (IU/L)

17.3 ± 4.3

70.3 ± 15.1

0.000

AST (IU/L)

15.9 ± 7.1

48.4 ± 22.6

0.000

HBV DNA (copies/mL)

4.9 × 103

6.5 × 108

0.000

HBV DNA levels were five times elevated in active carriers (HBV DNA levels = 4.38 × 108 (± 1.04 × 109) copies/mL vs 6.9 × 104 (± 4.9 × 105) copies/mL). More than 99% (n = 227) inactive carriers patients have HBV DNA levels less than 50, 000 copies/mL, and below undetected limits (< 200 copies/mL) in 21 patients.

Application of revised cutoff values

Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves were drawn for ALT, AST and HBV DNA levels. All of them showed high area under the curve (AUC) to discriminate HBeAg (-) active carriers from inactive as mentioned in Table 2 (see also Figure 1).
Table 2

ROC curve analysis of serum AST, ALT and HBV DNA levels

Test Result Variable(s)

Area

SE

P-value

95% C I

    

Lower Bound

Upper Bound

AST

0.969

0.006

0.000

0.957

0.982

ALT

0.997

0.002

0.000

0.994

1.001

HBV DNA level

1.000

0.000

0.000

1.000

1.000

Figure 1

ROC curve of serum ALT, AST and HBV DNA levels for HBeAg (-) patients showed serum ALT, AST and HBV levels could better predict HBV chronic active carriers at given cutoff value .

We observed approximately same sensitivity and specificity for the HBV DNA level ≥ 50,000 and NIH described limits ≥100,000 copies/mL. This value was much better than HBV DNA value of 2000, 5000 and 20,000 copies/mL. In general cohort, ALT and AST ≤ 20 IU/L were observed in 200 and 191 patients, respectively. ALT ≤ 30 IU/L showed high sensitivity (99.1%) and specificity (97.4%), while normal AST value (≤ 35 IU/L) showed high sensitivity (98.6%) but low specificity (77.8%) to discriminate active and inactive chronic HBeAg (-) carriers, respectively. In combination, ALT and HBV DNA levels; if ALT value were ≥30 IU/L for male and ≥19 IU/L for female, and HBV DNA load ≥100,000 copies/mL, a PPV of 97%, NPV of 94%, a sensitivity of 98%, and a specificity of 92% was observed to discriminate active carriers from inactive carriers (Table 3).
Table 3

Validity of serum ALT, AST and HBV DNA levels for the differentiation of patients with HBeAg (-) inactive chronic hepatitisB from active chronic HBeAg (-) carriers

Lab tests

Spe%

Sen%

PPV%

NPV%

Inactive carriers (n = 228)

Chronic carriers (n = 339)

ALT (IU/L)

≤ 20

99.1

87.7

99

92

200/28

2/337

≤ 30

97.4

99.1

96

99.3

226/2

8/331

≤ 35

96.6

99.6

96

99.6

227/1

9/330

≤ 40

93.4

100

93

100

228/0

16/323

AST (IU/L)

≤ 20

93.5

83.7

82

89.5

191/37

40/317

≤ 30

79.1

95.6

75.4

96.4

218/10

71/268

≤ 35

77.8

98.6

75.2

98.8

225/3

74/264

≤ 40

63.1

99.1

64.4

99.5

227/1

124/214

HBV DNA (Copies/mL)

≤ 2000

100

48.2

100

75

110/118

0/339

≤ 5000

100

75.4

100

84

172/56

0/339

≤ 20,000

100

95.1

100

95

217/21

0/339

≤ 50,000

100

99.1

100

99

227/1

0/339

≤ 100,000

100

100

100

100

228/0

0/339

ALT + HBV DNA (Our findings)

ALT (30 M/19F) HBV DNA (≤ 100,000 copies/mL)

92

98

97

94

210/18

5/334

ALT + HBV DNA (Assy et al.[22])

ALT (30 M/19F) HBV DNA (≤ 100,000 copies/mL)

100

92

100

86

-

-

A statistical significant correlation was found between HBV DNA levels and ALT in HBeAg (-) chronic active patients (r = 0.911, P < 0.05). However, no such association was observed in case of ALT in chronic inactive patients and AST in both groups (Figure 2).
Figure 2

Correlation of ALT and AST with HBV DNA levels in HBeAg chronic inactive and active patients . A and C: association between ALT and AST with HBV DNA levels in chronic inactive carriers; B and D: association between ALT and AST with HBV DNA levels in chronic active carriers.

Discussion

In this study, we assess the performance of new cut off values for serum ALT levels in male and female to predict active HBV in HBeAg (-) patients. As high ALT levels are thought to be associated with chronic HBV, and are commonly used during evaluation of HBV [10, 2528]. It is interesting to know that HBV evaluation depend on geographical association of the host and viral factors. Prati et al. proposed new cutoff value of ALT ≥ 30 IU/L in male and ≥19 IU/L in female [12], while Assy et al. 2009 reported ALT ≥ 30 IU/L in male and ≥ 19 IU/L in female along with HBV DNA levels ≥ 100000 copies/mL can classify a patient into the active carrier state [22]. Although, serum AST levels are not thought to be incredibly useful predictor of HBV disease, we also evaluate their performance either they are useful or not for discriminating HBeAg (-) chronic active from inactive patients.

Previous studies reported raised serum ALT levels from ULN can predict liver dysfunction with 90% specificity and 56% sensitivity [29], but according to Kim et al. prior testing of ELISA along with ALT level can better predict liver function as compared to only ALT levels [30]. This is particularly important because without performing PCR and liver biopsy, the decision as to predict HBeAg (-) chronic inactive is difficult. ROC curve analysis was performed to find out an accurate cutoff value for ALT, AST and HBV DNA load to guess HBeAg (-) inactive chronic patients from active (Table 2 and 3). Serum ALT, AST and HBV DNA levels were found to be highly significant with immense AUROC. Their performance was assessed by using different cut off values irrespective of patient's gender. We observed same results as described by Prati et al.[12] and Assy et al.[23]. ALT ≤30 IU/L and HBV DNA load ≤ 100,000 copies/mL showed high sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV to differentiate HBeAg (-) inactive chronic patients from active. In combination (ALT and HBV DNA levels) we observed higher sensitivity (98%) and NPV (94%) than previously described [22] (92% and 86%, respectively) (Table 3).

Although Borg et al. found AST level as an important predictor during same circumstances [31], and in our study single AST value (≤ 20 IU/L) also showed high sensitivity and specificity, its prognostic ability was not better than serum ALT and HBV DNA. Our results are in agreement with Assay et al[22]. that the new baseline value for ALT levels (30 IU/L for male and 19 IU/L for female) notably perform well than AST as given in Table 3.

We detect HBV DNA in all patients. By using new cut off value of ALT, HBV DNA cut off values 50, 000 and 100,000 copies/mL showed same investigative performance and were better than 2000, 5000 and 20,000 copies/mL. These results indicate that NIH proposed HBV DNA levels limits are useful, and our findings are according to the study by Assy et al.[22] as given in Table 3. As HBV DNA load and liver damage appears to be different in HBeAg (+) and negative patients. In HBeAg (+) patients, no correlation was found between severity of liver damage and HBV DNA load [3234]. In recent study by Kim et al. (2011) validate the performance of ALT and HBV DNA, and found that these markers may also used for discriminating patients with HBeAg (-) active carriers from inactive [35]. In our study, HBV DNA load was five times higher in chronic active patients. We also observed a positive significant correlation between HBV DNA levels and ALT in chronic active patients (Figure 2) leading to the conclusion that inflammation increases in patients with elevated HBV DNA levels as HBeAg has immunomodulatory action [36]. Recent studies showed that for HBeAg (-) patients, low HBV DNA levels are associated with less liver damage although some studies were unable to observe such relationship [37, 38]. These findings suggest that HBV DNA load and ALT are most convenient techniques to predict active chronic HBV in HBeAg (-) patients.

Although, there are some limitations in our study like absence of liver biopsy data, HBV genotyping and/or a short period of follow up; yet the population size in this study is far larger than reported by others. In conclusion, we verified the new cut off value of ALT and found better results than previously described and also found AST as good predictor.

Authors' information

Bushra Ijaz (M Phil Molecular Biology), Waqar Ahmad (M Phil Chemistry) and Gull S (MSc Biochemistry) are Research Officer; Javed FT is Head Pathology Department Jinnah Hospital, Lahore; while Sajida Hassan (PhD Molecular Biology) is Principal Investigator at CEMB, University of the Punjab, Lahore

Declarations

Acknowledgements

Financial support by Prime Minister program for prevention of hepatitis (2005-10) is highly acknowledged.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Applied and Functional Genomics lab, Centre of Excellence in Molecular Biology, University of the Punjab
(2)
Department of Pathology, Jinnah Hospital

References

  1. Narahari S, Juwle A, Basak S, Saranath D: Prevalence and geographic distribution of Hepatitis C Virus genotypes in Indian patient cohort. Infect Genet Evol 2009, 9: 643-645. 10.1016/j.meegid.2009.04.001View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Ono-Nita SK, Carrilho FJ, Cardoso RA, Nita ME, da Silva LC: Searching for chronic hepatitis B patients in a low prevalence area--role of racial origin. BMC Fam Pract 2004, 5: 7. 10.1186/1471-2296-5-7PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Buti M, Sanchez F, Cotrina M, Jardi R, Rodriguez F, Esteban R, Guardia J: Quantitative hepatitis B virus DNA testing for the early prediction of the maintenance of response during lamivudine therapy in patients with chronic hepatitis B. J Infect Dis 2001, 183: 1277-1280. 10.1086/319677View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Kessler HH, Preininger S, Stelzl E, Daghofer E, Santner BI, Marth E, Lackner H, Stauber RE: Identification of different states of hepatitis B virus infection with a quantitative PCR assay. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol 2000, 7: 298-300.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Zoulim F: Quantification and genotyping in management of chronic hepatitis B and C. Virus Res 2002, 82: 45-52. 10.1016/S0168-1702(01)00386-0View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Nelson KE, Shan H: Confirmatory testing of hepatitis C virus-positive enzyme immunoassay results in limited-resource countries: should it be attempted? Transfusion 2008, 48: 1239-1244. 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2008.01696.xView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Lok AS, McMahon BJ, Chronic hepatitis B: Hepatology. 2007, 45: 507-539. 10.1002/hep.21513View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Pratt DS, Kaplan MM: Evaluation of abnormal liver-enzyme results in asymptomatic patients. N Engl J Med 2000, 342: 1266-1271. 10.1056/NEJM200004273421707View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Dufour DR, Lott JA, Nolte FS, Gretch DR, Koff RS, Seeff LB: Diagnosis and monitoring of hepatic injury. I. Performance characteristics of laboratory tests. Clin Chem 2000, 46: 2027-2049.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Green RM, Flamm S: AGA technical review on the evaluation of liver chemistry tests. Gastroenterology 2002, 123: 1367-1384. 10.1053/gast.2002.36061View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Kim HJ, Oh SW, Kim DJ, Choi EY: Abundance of immunologically active alanine aminotransferase in sera of liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma patients. Clin Chem 2009, 55: 1022-1025. 10.1373/clinchem.2008.102996View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Prati D, Taioli E, Zanella A, Della Torre E, Butelli S, Del Vecchio E, Vianello L, Zanuso F, Mozzi F, Milani S, Conte D, Colombo M: Updated definitions of healthy ranges for serum alanine aminotransferase levels. Ann Intern Med 2002, 137: 1-10.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Sheth SG, Flamm SL, Gordon FD, Chopra S: AST/ALT ratio predicts cirrhosis in patients with chronic hepatitis C virus infection. Am J Gastroenterol 1998, 93: 44-48. 10.1111/j.1572-0241.1998.044_c.xView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Brodkin CA, Daniell W, Checkoway H, Echeverria D, Johnson J, Wang K, Sohaey R, Green D, Redlich C, Gretch D, et al.: Hepatic ultrasonic changes in workers exposed to perchloroethylene. Occup Environ Med 1995, 52: 679-685. 10.1136/oem.52.10.679PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Kelleher TB, Afdhal N: Assessment of liver fibrosis in co-infected patients. J Hepato 2006, 44: S126-S131. 10.1016/j.jhep.2005.11.026View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Kim HC, Nam CM, Jee SH, Han KH, Oh DK, Suh I: Normal serum aminotransferase concentration and risk of mortality from liver diseases: prospective cohort study. BMJ 2004, 328: 983. 10.1136/bmj.38050.593634.63PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Kim WR, Flamm SL, Di Bisceglie AM, Bodenheimer HC: Serum activity of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) as an indicator of health and disease. Hepatology 2008, 47: 1363-1370. 10.1002/hep.22109View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Sherman M: Risk of hepatocellular carcinoma in hepatitis B and prevention through treatment. Cleve Clin J Med 2009, 76: S6-9. 10.3949/ccjm.76.s3.02View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Sung JJ, Chan HL, Wong ML, Tse CH, Yuen SC, Tam JS, Leung NW: Relationship of clinical and virological factors with hepatitis activity in hepatitis B e antigen-negative chronic hepatitis B virus-infected patients. J Viral Hepat 2002, 9: 229-234. 10.1046/j.1365-2893.2002.00352.xView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Yuen MF, Yuan HJ, Wong DK, Yuen JC, Wong WM, Chan AO, Wong BC, Lai KC, Lai CL: Prognostic determinants for chronic hepatitis B in Asians: therapeutic implications. Gut 2005, 54: 1610-1614. 10.1136/gut.2005.065136PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Chan HL, Wong VW, Wong GL, Chim AM, Lai LH, Sung JJ: Evaluation of impact of serial hepatitis B virus DNA levels on development of hepatocellular carcinoma. J Clin Microbiol 2009, 47: 1830-1836. 10.1128/JCM.00029-09PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Assy N, Beniashvili Z, Djibre A, Nasser G, Grosovski M, Nseir W: Lower baseline ALT cut-off values and HBV DNA levels better differentiate HBeAg- chronic hepatitis B patients from inactive chronic carriers. World J Gastroenterol 2009, 15: 3025-3031. 10.3748/wjg.15.3025PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Degertekin B, Lok AS: When to start and stop hepatitis B treatment: can one set of criteria apply to all patients regardless of age at infection? Ann Intern Med 2007, 147: 62-64.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Fattovich G, Bortolotti F, Donato F: Natural history of chronic hepatitis B: special emphasis on disease progression and prognostic factors. J Hepatol 2008, 48: 335-352. 10.1016/j.jhep.2007.11.011View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Dufour DR, Lott JA, Nolte FS, Gretch DR, Koff RS, Seeff LB: Diagnosis and monitoring of hepatic injury. I. Performance characteristics of laboratory tests. Clin Chem 2000, 46: 2027-2049.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Kim HJ, Oh SW, Kim DJ, Choi EY: Abundance of immunologically active alanine aminotransferase in sera of liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma patients. Clin Chem 2009, 55: 1022-1025. 10.1373/clinchem.2008.102996View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Wu XJ, Wang Y, Chen J, Wang GQ: Baseline predictors of virological response for chronic hepatitis B patients. World J Gastroenterol 2009, 15: 4311-4315. 10.3748/wjg.15.4311PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Keeffe EB, Dieterich DT, Han SH, Jacobson IM, Martin P, Schiff ER, Tobias H: A treatment algorithm for the management of chronic hepatitis B virus infection in the United States: 2008 update. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2008, 6: 1315-1341. 10.1016/j.cgh.2008.08.021View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Ferraris R, Colombatti G, Fiorentini MT, Carosso R, Arossa W, de la PM: Diagnostic value of serum bile acids and routine liver function tests in hepatobiliary diseases. Sensitivity, specificity, and predictive value. Dig Dis Sci 1983, 28: 129-136. 10.1007/BF01315142View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Kim HC, Nam CM, Jee SH, Han KH, Oh DK, Suh I: Normal serum aminotransferase concentration and risk of mortality from liver diseases: prospective cohort study. BMJ 2004, 328: 983. 10.1136/bmj.38050.593634.63PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. ter Borg F, ten Kate FJ, Cuypers HT, Leentvaar-Kuijpers A, Oosting J, Wertheim-van Dillen PM, Honkoop P, Rasch MC, de Man RA, van Hattum J, Chamuleau RA, Reesink HW, Jones EA: Relation between laboratory test results and histological hepatitis activity in individuals positive for hepatitis B surface antigen and antibodies to hepatitis B e antigen. Lancet 1998, 351: 1914-1918. 10.1016/S0140-6736(97)09391-4View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Yuen MF, Ng IO, Fan ST, Yuan HJ, Wong DK, Yuen JC, Sum SS, Chan AO, Lai CL: Significance of HBV DNA Levels in Liver Histology of HBeAg and Anti-HBe Positive Patients with Chronic Hepatitis B. Am J Gastroenterol 2004, 99: 20327. 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2004.40440.xView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Manesis EK, Papatheodoridis GV, Sevastianos V, Cholongitas E, Papaioannou C, Hadziyannis SJ: Significance of hepatitis B viremia levels determined by a quantitive polymerase chain assay in patient with hepatitis B e antigen negative chronic hepatitis B virus infection. Am J Gastroentrol 2003, 98: 2261-2267.Google Scholar
  34. Seo Y, Yoon S, Nakaji M, Yano Y, Nagano H, Ninomiya T, Hayashi Y, Kasuga M: Hepatitis B virus DNA in anti- HBe-positive asymptomatic carriers. Intervirology 2003, 46: 43-49. 10.1159/000068123View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Kim ES, Seo YS, Keum , Kim JH, An H, Yim HJ, Kim YS, Jeen YT, Chun HJ, Um SH, Kim CD, Ryu HS, Lee HS: A Threshold HBV DNA Level for Discriminating Patients with Hepatitis B e Antigen-Negative Chronic Hepatitis B from Inactive Carriers. Hep Monthly 2011, in press.Google Scholar
  36. Milich DR: Immune response to hepatitis B virus proteins: relevance of the murine model. Semin Liver Dis 1991, 11: 93-112. 10.1055/s-2008-1040428View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Chan HL, Wong VW, Wong GL, Chim AM, Lai LH, Sung JJ: Viral genotype and hepatitis B virus DNA levels are correlated with histological liver damage in HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B virus infection. Am J Gastroenterol 2002, 97: 406-412. 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2002.05478.xView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Sakugawa H, Nakasone H, Nakayoshi T, Kawakami Y, Yamashiro T, Maeshiro T, Kinjo F, Saito A: Correlation between serum transaminase activity and virus load among patients with chronic liver disease type B. Hepatol Res 2001, 21: 159-168. 10.1016/S1386-6346(01)00085-7View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Ijaz et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.