Skip to main content

Hepatitis C Treatment: current and future perspectives


Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is a member of Flaviviridae family and one of the major causes of liver disease. There are about 175 million HCV infected patients worldwide that constitute 3% of world's population. The main route of HCV transmission is parental however 90% intravenous drug users are at highest risk. Standard interferon and ribavirin remained a gold standard of chronic HCV treatment having 38-43% sustained virological response rates. Currently the standard therapy for HCV is pegylated interferon (PEG-INF) with ribavirin. This therapy achieves 50% sustained virological response (SVR) for genotype 1 and 80% for genotype 2 & 3. As pegylated interferon is expensive, standard interferon is still the main therapy for HCV treatment in under developed countries. On the other hand, studies showed that pegylated IFN and RBV therapy has severe side effects like hematological complications. Herbal medicines (laccase, proanthocyandin, Rhodiola kirilowii) are also being in use as a natural and alternative way for treatment of HCV but there is not a single significant report documented yet. Best SVR indicators are genotype 3 and 2, < 0.2 million IU/mL pretreatment viral load, rapid virological response (RVR) rate and age <40 years. New therapeutic approaches are under study like interferon related systems, modified forms of ribavirin, internal ribosome entry site (HCV IRES) inhibitors, NS3 and NS5a inhibitors, novel immunomodulators and specifically targeted anti-viral therapy for hepatitis C compounds. More remedial therapies include caspase inhibitors, anti-fibrotic agents, antibody treatment and vaccines.


Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is a meticulous factor of liver disease and one of the most important health issues worldwide [1, 2]. Hepatitis C has approximately 175 million Global Disease Burden which represent almost 3% of the whole population in the world, each year 3 to 4 million new patients with HCV are diagnosed. HCV remains endemic in many countries of the world [35]. Statistics based on general healthy population revealed that HCV has 5.3% seroprevalence in Pakistan, 2.2% in Turkey and 7.7% in Zimbabwe [68]. Hepatitis C virus infection is not a main factor of mortality in the first decade of infection [9]. Even though, the biological aspects of HCV are revealed to a great extent in recent years, an absolute therapy of hepatitis C remains problematic in a large majority of patients [10] and about 50% HCV patients does not attain sustained virological Responses [1113].

A few years back, it was not easy to study HCV in invitro because there was no proficient system present but fortunately Heller et al got success in establishing in vitro model of HCV virions. This system proves good for high level production and secretion of HCV virions hence this system expands the scope of tools present for HCV study [14, 15]. Many patients remain asymptomatic for years and are only detected on health screening or at the time of blood transfer [16]. Peg. INF and ribavirin therapy is still the therapy of choice for HCV patients besides having many side affects [17, 12]. As HCV is mainly a chronic disease and progress very slowly therefore persistent infection is a typical characteristic of disease which can be found in approximately 75% patient at primarily stage. Prospective studies conducted on natural history suggest that HCV take almost 20 years to develop cirrhosis and only 20% of cirrhotic patient can develop Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC) after 40 years of preliminary infection [18, 10].

HCV genotypes and treatment response

Patients with different HCV genotypes react in a different way to alpha interferon because genotype is one of the strongest prognostic aspects of sustained virological response [19, 20]. This clinical importance of HCV genotype was revealed by clinical studies based on interferon treatment response account [5]. Patients show more sustained virological response when suffered from HCV genotype 2 and 3 as compared to HCV infected persons of genotype1 [6]. Patients infected with HCV genotype 2 and 3 show 65% SVR and patients with HCV genotype 1 show 30% Sustained Virological Response (SVR) [7, 8]. Thus genotype of patients must not be over looked when giving standard interferon therapy. Different ethnic groups respond differently to standard therapy of HCV and hence there is variation in Early Treatment Response (ETR) and SVR rates [21].

Mechanism of Pathogenesis and interferon resistance

Now a number of mechanisms associated with escape of the pathogen from the host's immune response, hepatocyte damage and molecular oncogenesis of hepatocellular carcinoma have been elucidated. Inefficient clearance of virus from patient's body is basically due to the hyper-variability of virus envelope protein that enables HCV to neutralize antibody [22, 23]. Once the virus enters the hepatocytes through receptor mediated endocytosis and starts replication, it initiate damaging of hepatocyte, the major component of which is through the host's own immune response [24, 23]. Interferon is the most potent natural weapon of the host against intra-cellular viral infection. HCV, however, owing to intricate actions of its genomic proteins is equipped with ability to evade the natural interferon-mediated clearance. HCV core protein has been reported to decrease the robustness of the host's immune response by decreasing transcription of interferon induced antiviral genes [25, 23]. HCV NS3/4A protease also has been concerned in inhibiting the interferon amplification loop which otherwise results in suppression of HCV replication. Inhibition of HCV protease can reverse the effects of HCV infection that make protease inhibitors one of the most noteworthy potential therapeutic agents for HCV [26, 25].

Route of transmission and treatment response

At first, it was believed that most frequent route of transmission of HCV was blood transfusion and intravenous drug abuse. But recent epidemiological studies suggest further routes of transmission [27]. The main route of HCV transmission is parental. However 90% intravenous drug users are at highest risk of getting HCV infection such as those who require multiple blood transfusions and blood products (hemophiliacs) or those who go through major surgery [28, 29]. Unlike HBV, HCV infection transfer less frequently by sexual or intimate contact (0.4 to 3%). Domestic contacts are also at low risk [30]. Almost 5% HCV infections are caused by needle stick injury [29, 30]. 3% to 5% infants acquire HCV from infected mother by perinatal transmission [31]. HCV is present in saliva and milk but transfer of HCV infection through breast milk has not been reported [32, 33].

Community barbershops also play a key role in HCV transmission in under development countries [27]. Some other reported risk factors of disease transmission are dental and surgical treatments, circumcision, ear piercing, tattooing and dialysis [3436]. In a study conducted on 3351 patients of HCV in Pakistan it has been documented that more than 70% hepatitis C infections are spread in hospitals by the use of same needle several times and major or minor operations that are extremely frequent in Pakistan. Globally reuse of needles is also common source of transmission [37]. Studies show that RVR and SVR are independent of transmission routes of HCV.

Base line diagnosis

Detection of anti HCV by ELISA is the initial step in diagnosis of HCV infection and it is more than 99% sensitive and specific [38]. PCR is the second main step in the analysis of chronic HCV infection and exposure of virus is usually detectable within 7 to 21 days [39, 40]. Liver biopsy is also an important parameter in diagnosis of chronic HCV infection but as persons infected with genotype 2/3 respond well to standard therapy, treatment can be started without liver biopsy [40].

Therapy for HCV infection

Chronic HCV is treated with a glycoprotein commonly known as interferon (INF) alpha and it is considered the backbone of therapy because it efficiently increases the immune response against virus [41]. Afterward interferon plus ribavirin become a gold standard (3 MIU thrice weekly along with ribavirin 800 to1200 mg per day). This treatment enhances SVR rate up to 38-43%. As SVR greatly depend on HCV genotype so genotype 1 needs treatment for 48 weeks to achieve SVR of 29% and genotype 2 and 3 needs treatment up to 24 weeks to attain SVR rate of 66% [42]. Currently the regular treatment of HCV is pegelated interferon (PEG-INF) in combination with ribavirin. This therapy achieves SVR of about 50% for genotype 1 and 80% for genotype 2 & 3 [43].

There are two types of pegylated interferon; PEG-IFN-alpha-2a and PEG-IFN-alpha-2b. These are dissimilar only by size and configuration of the polyethylene glycol molecules that has binding sites for interferon. The functioning of these two formulated interferon not compared still but both are equally good for HCV treatment [44].

Current HCV therapy for genotypes 2a to 2b, 3a to 3d, 5a, 6a and mixed genotypes infected patients is 3 subcutaneous injections of 3 MU of recombinant interferon alpha and ribavirin (10 mg per day per kg body weight) in one week for 6 months. Individuals infected from HCV genotype 1a to 1c, 4 and mixture of 1 and 4 HCV genotypes should receive three 3 MU subcutaneous injections of recombinant IFN alpha and ribavirin that are given orally (for individuals with ≤ 75 kg body weight) require 1,000 mg per day, for patients with > 75 kg body mass require 1,200 mg per day) in a week for total 48 weeks [45].

Conventional interferon (C-INF) therapy is used for HCV treatment in poor countries because of financial reasons and Pakistan Society of Gastroenterology and GI Endoscopy also recommend the use of C-INF therapy for HCV genotype 3 in Pakistan [46, 40]. In under developed and developing countries including Pakistan, pegylated interferon therapy is beyond the reach of common poor patients [47, 40]. In 2001, FDA permitted two kinds of PEG-INF (i) PEG-INF Alpha 2a (40 KD) and (ii) PEG-INF Alpha 2b (12 KD). These are administered only once a week because they have long half life of plasma (almost 10 times) in comparison with conventional INF. Liver primarily metabolizes PEG-INF Alpha 2a and kidney excretes out PEG-INF Alpha 2b. Recent studies and clinical trials confirmed that SVR rates could be increased by the using mono therapy with PEG-INF 2a or PEG-INF 2b in comparison with conventional interferon [48, 40].

Limitations of Recent HCV Therapy

It has been reported that 40% to 50% patients with HCV genotypes 1 and or 4 early attain SVR in comparison with 80% patients infected with genotypes 2 and or 3 [4, 49]. However PEG-IFN and ribavirin treatment has severe side effects. Major complications of standard interferon and ribavirin therapy are anemia, cytopenias, neutropenia and thrombocytopenia as elucidated in table 1.

Table 1 Contraindications situations for pegylated interferon and ribavirin therapy

Novel types of interferon alpha (albinterferon) are under study; these might be very suitable anti-viral therapy because these can be given just once or twice a month as compared to standard PEG-IFN therapy [4, 49]. Taribavirin, a recently introduced drug, is tested in various randomized trials that show low efficacy but also has a few complains of anemia and the side effects are easily manageable [50, 4]. There are also several side affects associated with conventional interferon and ribavirin therapy including Influenza like sign and symptoms. For example headache, myalgias or arthralgias, fever, anorexia, nausea or vomiting, fatigue, abdominal pains, insomnia, suicide attempt, pruritis, anaemia, redness at injection site, dry skin, leucopoenia, irritability, thrombocytopoenia, anxiety, psychosis and laryngitis [51].

Herbal treatment

There is no effective vaccine developed or excellent drug available for the treatment of HCV. Standard INF therapy in combination with ribavirin show sustained virological response with efficacy of not more than 50%, therefore most of the patients try herbal medicine and conventional medicine all over the world particularly in poor countries. Laccase are largely used as herbal medicine that is extracted from oyster mushroom (Pleurotus ostreatus). Studies showed that laccase is proficient in inhibiting the HCV replication rate [52] however the mechanism of action of this medicine is not known.

Herbal treatment can open a natural and alternative way for treatment of HCV. As Hepatitis C virus infects liver and this infection requires two or more decades to extend into substantial disease, a nutritional supplement might facilitate to decrease or stop disease development. More recent studies regarding herbal treatment provoke a hope for HCV patient that is based on a chemical known as proanthocyandin, extracted from blueberry leaves. It has been reported that proanthocyandin can stop HCV replication in infected patients [53]. According to another study rhizomes of the Chinese medicinal herb Rhodiola kirilowii may also act as possible inhibitor of HCV [54].

Factors affecting treatment response

Treatment response is better in patient of less than 40 years of age in comparison with elderly. Young females respond well to the treatment. High intensity of viremia is related with deprived response. Immunodeficiency, excessive use of alcohol and co-infection with HIV or HBV, all harmfully cause the result to HCV infection [55, 16].

HCV therapy is not suitable for people suffering from severe HCV related cirrhosis, undergone organ transplant, children of < 3 years and specific contraindication to the medication. Interferon causes severe side effect includes, anxiety, irritability personality changes, even suicide, depression or acute psychosis. Ribavirin side effect included anemia, renal dysfunction of coronary artery. Fetal abnormality and fatality are important side effects of ribavirin, a well-known teratogen.

Due to the distinctive character of the virus to develop vaccine against HCV leftovers, a disappointment has been seen due to its high mutation rate. It has already been reported that the rate of HCV reproduction is high and the error-prone polymerase causes mutation continuously. The high HCV replication rate provides sufficient chance of mutation that occurs in the viral population inside an infected person. Production of virus has been estimated at 1012 (one trillion) new HCV virions per day [56]. Studies on chronically infected HCV patients show that rate of mutation in HCV genome has been approximately 0.001 substitutions per genomic site in one year. Such high rate of mutation could result into 8-18 mutations within the RNA of 9.6 kb genomic size. It has also been reported that envelop protein E2 has highly mutated sites known as hypervariable region HVR1. High variation in E2 causes immune escape mutants of the virus as of the neutralizing antibodies and therefore describes the constant viremia. In addition to E2 gene, P7 region has also been shown with increased variability [16].

Future perspectives

New therapeutic approaches are under study like interferon related systems, modified forms of ribavirin, siRNA, internal ribosome entry site (IRES) inhibitors, NS3 and NS5a inhibitors and novel immunomodulators. These are particularly for those patients who show low SVR rate by traditional therapies. More remedial therapies include antifibrotic agents, caspase inhibitors and antibody treatment and vaccines. Particularly targeted antiviral compounds like specifically targeted anti-viral therapy for hepatitis C' (STAT-C) compounds are now under study by scientists that are used along with standard interferon therapy. Reports confirm improved SVR rate at least in HCV genotype 1 patients. Further studies are required to confirm its significance in the clearance of HCV RNA if used as a single therapy without interferon and ribavirin [57, 58].


Currently chronic HCV treatment consists of pegelated interferon alpha and a nucleoside analogue ribavirin for 3 to 18 months. However several side effects are associated with this treatment. New therapeutic approaches are under study and recent clinical trials are being focused on inhibitors of HCV NS3 and NS5a RNA polymerase. Parameters that increase SVR rate for HCV are genotype 2 and 3, age < 40 years and low viral load before treatment.



hepatitis C virus


pegylated interferon


rapid virological response


sustained virological response




end of treatment response


enzyme linked immunosorbant assay


polymerase chain reaction


million international units


standard interferon


hiper variable region


internal ribosome entry site


specifically targeted anti-viral therapy for hepatitis C.


  1. Asselah T, Estrabaud E, Bieche I, Lapalus M, De Muynck S, Vidaud M, Saadoun D, Soumelis V, Marcellin P: Hepatitis C: viral and host factors associated with non-response to pegylated interferon plus ribavirin. Liver Int 2010. ISSN 1478-3223

    Google Scholar 

  2. Alter MJ: Epidemiology of hepatitis C virus infection. World J Gastroenterol 2007,13(17):2436-41.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Butt AA: Hepatitis C virus infection: the new global epidemic. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther 2005, 3: 241-9. 10.1586/14787210.3.2.241

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Soriano V, Peters MarionG, Zeuzem S: New Therapies for Hepatitis C Virus Infection. Clinical Infectious Diseases 2009, 48: 313-20. 10.1086/595848

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Koziel M, Peters M: Viral hepatitis in HIV infection. N Engl J Med 2007, 356: 1445-54. 10.1056/NEJMra065142

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Demirtürk N, Demirdal T, Toprak D, Altindiş M, Aktepe OC: Hepatitis B and C virus in West-Central Turkey: Seroprevalence in healthy individuals admitted to a university hospital for routine health checks. Turk J Gastroenterol 2006, 17: 267-72.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Gangaidzo IT, Moyo VM, Khumalo H, Saungweme T, Gomo Z, Rouault T, Gordeuk VR: Hepatitis C virus in Zimbabwe. Cent Afr J Med 1997, 43: 122-5.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Khokhar N, Gill ML, Malik GJ: General seroprevalence ofhepatitis C and hepatitis B virus infections in population. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak 2004, 14: 534-6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Harris HE, Ramsay ME, Andrews N, Eldridge KP: Clinical course of hepatitis C virus during the first decade of infection: cohort study. BMJ 2002, 324: 1-6. 10.1136/bmj.324.7335.450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Jawaid A, Khuwaja AK: Treatment and vaccination for hepatitis C: present and future. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad 2008,20(1):129-33.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Manns MP, McHutchison JG, Gordon SC, Rustgi VK, Shiffman M, Reindollar R, Goodman ZD, Koury K, Ling M, Albrecht JK: Peginterferon alfa-2b plus ribavirin compared with interferon alfa-2b plus ribavirin for initial treatment of chronic hepatitis C: a randomised trial. Lancet 2001,358(9286):958-965. 10.1016/S0140-6736(01)06102-5

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Baldick CJ, Wichroski MJ, Pendri A, Walsh AW, Fang J, Mazzucco CE, Pokornowski KA, Rose RE, Eggers BJ, Hsu M, Zhai W, Zhai G, Gerritz SW, Poss MA, Meanwell NA, Cockett MI, Tenney DJ: A novel small molecule inhibitor of hepatitis C virus entry. PLoS Pathog 2010.,6(9): pii:e1001086.10.1371/journal.ppat.1001086 10.1371/journal.ppat.1001086

    Google Scholar 

  13. National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference Statement: Management of hepatitis C 2002 (June 10-12, 2002). Gastroenterology 2002,123(6):2082-2099. 10.1053/gast.2002.1232082

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Heller T, Saito S, Auerbach J, Williams T, Moreen TR, Jazwinski A, Cruz B, Jeurkar N, Sapp R, Luo G, Liang TJ: An in vitro model of hepatitis C virion production. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2005, 102: 2579-83. 10.1073/pnas.0409666102

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Sheehy P, Mullan B, Moreau I, Kenny-Walsh E, Shanahan F, Scallan M, Fanning LJ: In vitro replication models for the hepatitis C virus. J Viral Hepa 2007,14(1):2-10. 10.1111/j.1365-2893.2006.00807.x

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Contreras AM, Ochoa-Jiménez RJ, Celis A, Méndez C, Olivares L, Rebolledo CE, Hernandez-Lugo I, Aguirre-Zavala AI, Jiménez-Méndez R, Chung RT: High antibody level: an accurate serologic marker of viremia in asymptomatic people with hepatitis C infection. Transfusion 2010,50(6):1335-43. 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2009.02571.x

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Fried MW, Shiffman ML, Reddy KR, Smith C, Marinos G, Gonçales FL Jr, Häussinger D, Diago M, Carosi G, Dhumeaux D, Craxi A, Lin A, Hoffman J, Yu J: Peginterferon alfa-2a plus ribavirin for chronic hepatitis C virus infection. N Engl J Med 2002,347(13):975-982. 10.1056/NEJMoa020047

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Seeff LB: Natural history of hepatitis C. Am J Med 1999,107(6B):10S-15S. 10.1016/S0002-9343(99)00374-5

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Idrees M, Riazuddin S: Frequency distribution of hepatitis C virus genotypes in different geographical regions of Pakistan and their possible routes of transmission. BMC Infectious Diseases 2008, 8: 69. 10.1186/1471-2334-8-69

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Zein NN, Rakela J, Krawitt EL, Reddy KR, Tominaga T, Persing DH: Hepatitis C virus genotypes in the United States: epidemiology, pathogenicity, and response to interferon therapy. Ann Intern Med 1996, 125: 634-639.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Idrees M, Riazuddin S: A study of best positive predictors for sustained virologic response to interferon alpha plus ribavirin therapy in naive chronic hepatitis C patients. BMC Gastroenterology 2009, 9: 5. 10.1186/1471-230X-9-5

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Brown RJ, Juttla VS, Tarr AW, Finnis R, Irving WL, Hemsley S, Flower DR, Borrow P, Ball JK: Evolutionary dynamics of hepatitis C virus envelope genes during chronic infection. J Gen Virol 2005,86(7):1931-42. 10.1099/vir.0.80957-0

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Choi J, James JHO: Mechanisms of Liver Injury. III. Oxidative stress in the pathogenesis of hepatitis C virus. J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 2006, 290: G847-G851. 10.1152/ajpgi.00522.2005

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Nelson DR: The immunopathogenesis of hepatitis C virus infection. Clin Liver Dis 2001, 5: 931-53. 10.1016/S1089-3261(05)70202-6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. De Lucas S, Bartolome J, Carreno V: Hepatitis C virus core protein down-regulates transcription of interferon-induced antiviral genes. J Infect Dis 2005, 191: 93-9. 10.1086/426509

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Karayiannis P: The hepatitis C virus NS3/4A protease complex interferes with pathways of the innate immune response. J Hepatol 2005, 43: 743-5. 10.1016/j.jhep.2005.07.004

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Raja1 NS, Janjua KA: Epidemiology of hepatitis C virus infection in Pakistan. J Microbiol Immunol Infect 2008, 41: 4-8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Khokhar N, Gill ML, Malik KJ: General seroprevalance of Hepatitis C & hepatitis B virus infections in Pakistan. J Coll Phy Surg Pak 2004,14(9):534-15.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Kiyosawa K, Sodeyama T, Tanaku E: Hepatitis C in hospital employees with needle stick injuries. Ann intern Med 1991, 115: 367-9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Din RU, Kamal A, Khan HU: Hepatitis C. Gomal Journal of Medical Sciences 2004,2(1):27-29.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Papanastasiou DA, Spiliopoulou I, Katinakis S, Karana-Ginopoulou A, Repanti M: Lack of transmission of hepatitis C in household contacts of children with homozygous beta-thalassaemia. Acta Haematol 1997,97(3):168-73. 10.1159/000203675

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Ohto H, Terazawa S, Sasaki N, Sasaki N, Hino K, Ishiwata C, Kako M, Ujiie N, Endo C, Matsui A: Transmission of hepatitis C virus from mothers to infants. N Engl J Med 1994, 330: 744-750. 10.1056/NEJM199403173301103

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Ogasawara S, ki Kagem: Hepatitis C virus RNA in saliva and breast milk of Hepatitis C carriers. Lancet 1993, 341: 561. 10.1016/0140-6736(93)90324-A

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Muhammad N, Jan MA: Frequency of hepatitis "C" in Buner, NWFP. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak 2005, 15: 11-4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Butt AK, Khan AA, Khan SY, Sharea I: Dentistry as a possibl route of hepatitis C transmission in Pakistan. Int Dent J 2003, 53: 141-4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Khokhar N, Aijazi I, Gill ML: Spectrum of hepatocellular carcinoma at Shifa International Hospital, Islamabad. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad 2003, 15: 1-4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Romano CM, de Carvalho-Mello IM, Jamal LF, de Melo FL, Iamarino A, Motoki M, Pinho JR, Holmes EC, de Andrade Zanotto PM: VGDN Consortium: Social networks shape the transmission dynamics of hepatitis C virus. PLoS One 2010.,5(6): e11170.10.137/journal.pone 10.1371/journal.pone.0011170

    Google Scholar 

  38. Iancu LS: Diagnostic strategies in Hepatitis C virus infection. Rev Med Chir Soc Med Nat Iasi 2001,105(1):37-42.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Gretch DR: Diagnostic tests for Hepatitis C. Hepatology 1997,299(1):435-475.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Castillo I, Bartolomé J, Quiroga JA, Barril G, Carreño V: Diagnosis of occult hepatitis C without the need for a liver biops. J Med Virol 2010,82(9):1554-9. 10.1002/jmv.21866

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Caritter RL, Emerson SS: Therapy of hepatitis - meta analysis of interferon alpha 2b trials. Hepatology 1997,26(3,1):835-85.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Poynard T: Randomized trial of interferon alpha-2b plus ribavirin for 48 weeks versus interferon alpha-2b plus placebo for 48 weeks for the treatment of chronic hepatitis-C virus. Lancet 1998, 351: 1426. 10.1016/S0140-6736(98)07124-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Fox RK, Wright TL: Viral Hepatitis. Current diagnosis and treatment. Gastroenterology 2003, 2: 446-562.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Sherman M, Shafran S, Burak K, Doucette K, Wong W, Girgrah N, Yoshida E, Renner E, Wong P, Deschênes M: Management of chronicnhepatitis C: Consensus guidelines. Can J Gastroenterol 2007,21(Suppl C):25C-34C.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Idrees M, Riazuddin S: A study of best positive predictors for sustained virologic response to interferon alpha plus ribavirin therapy in naive chronic hepatitis C patients. BMC Gastroenterol 2009, 9: 5. 10.1186/1471-230X-9-5

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Hamid S, Umar M, Alam A, Siddiqui A, Qureshi H, Butt J: PSG consensus statement on management of hepatitis C virus infection--2003. J Pak Med Assoc 2004, 54: 146-150.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Zuberi Bader, Zuberi Faisal, Memon Sajjad, Qureshi Muhammad, Ali Sheikh, Salahuddin Afsar: Sustained virological response based on rapid virological response in genotype-3 chronic hepatitis C treated with standard interferon in the Pakistani population. World J Gastroenterol 2008,14(14):2218-2221. 10.3748/wjg.14.2218

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Hadziyannis SJ, Cheinquer H, Morgan T: Peg interferon alpha-2a (40 KD) in combination with ribavirin -Efficacy and safety results from phase 3, randomized double blind, multicenter study examining effect of duration and ribavirin dose. J Hepatol 2002,36(1):3. 10.1016/S0168-8278(02)80001-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Zeuzem S, Yoshida E, Benhamou Y: Sustained virologic response rates with albinterferon alfa-2b plus ribavirin treatment in IFN-naïve chronic hepatitis C genotype 1 patients. Hepatology 2007,46(l):317A.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Gish R, Arora S, Rajender K, David RN, Christopher OB, Xu Y: Murphy B:Virological response and safety outcomes in therapy-naive patients treated for chronic hepatitis C with taribavirin or ribavirin in combination with pegylated interferon alfa-2a: a randomized, phase 2 study. J Hepatol 2007, 47: 51-9. 10.1016/j.jhep.2007.02.018

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Orito E, Mizoguchi N: Hepatitis-C virus serotype 2 response more favourably to interferone; a therapy. J Hepatol 1994, 21: 130-2. 10.1016/S0168-8278(94)80149-5

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. El-Fakharany EM, Haroun BM, Ng TB, Redwan ER: Oyster mushroom laccase inhibits hepatitis C virus entry into peripheral blood cells and hepatoma cells. Protein Pept Lett 2010,17(8):1031-9. 10.2174/092986610791498948

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Takeshita M, Ishida YO, Akamatsu E, Ohmori Y, Sudoh M, Uto H, Tsubouchi H, Kataoka H: Proanthocyanidin from Blueberry Leaves Suppresses Expression of Subgenomic Hepatitis C Virus RNA. journal of biological chemistry 2009,284(32):21165-21176. 10.1074/jbc.M109.004945

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Zuo G, Li Z, Chen L, Xu X: Activity of compounds from Chinese herbal medicine Rhodiola kirilowii (Regel) Maxim against HCV NS3 serine protease. Antiviral Res 2007,76(1):86-92. 10.1016/j.antiviral.2007.06.001

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Welfman M, Brotodihardjo A, Crewe E: Coinfection with hepatitis B and C, C and D viruses result in severe chronic liver disease and responds poorly to interferon. J Vviral Hept 1995, 2: 39-45. 10.1111/j.1365-2893.1995.tb00070.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Neumann AU, Lam NP, Dahari H, Gretch DR, Wiley TE, Layden TJ, Perelson AS: Hepatitis C viral dynamics in vivo and the antiviral efficacy of interferon-alpha therapy. Science 1998, 282: 103-7. 10.1126/science.282.5386.103

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Lange CM, C. Sarrazin, Zeuzem S: specifically targeted anti-viral therapy for hepatitis C - a new era in therapy. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2010, 32: 14-28.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Kapadia SB, Brideau-Andersen A, Chisari FV: Interference of hepatitis C vius RNA replication by short interfering RNAs. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2003,100(4):2014-8. 10.1073/pnas.252783999

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to Muhammad Idrees.

Additional information

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors' contributions

SM and SS reviewed the literature, and wrote the manuscript. MI edited the manuscript. AT, SB, BR, AH, SB, ZA, MN, ZF, MA, LA, MA, MA, BK, helped SM & SS in literature review. All the authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Saira Munir, Sana Saleem contributed equally to this work.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Munir, S., Saleem, S., Idrees, M. et al. Hepatitis C Treatment: current and future perspectives. Virol J 7, 296 (2010).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: