Skip to main content
Download PDF

Inhibitory effect of small interfering RNA on dengue virus replication in mosquito cells

Virology Journal volume 7, Article number: 270 (2010) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Dengue viruses (DENs) are the wildest transmitted mosquito-borne pathogens throughout tropical and sub-tropical regions worldwide. Infection with DENs can cause severe flu-like illness and potentially fatal hemorrhagic fever. Although RNA interference triggered by long-length dsRNA was considered a potent antiviral pathway in the mosquito, only limited studies of the value of small interfering RNA (siRNA) have been conducted.

Results

A 21 nt siRNA targeting the membrane glycoprotein precursor gene of DEN-1 was synthesized and transfected into mosquito C6/36 cells followed by challenge with DEN. The stability of the siRNA in cells was monitored by flow cytometry. The antiviral effect of siRNA was evaluated by measurement of cell survival rate using the MTT method and viral RNA was quantitated with real-time RT-PCR. The presence of cells containing siRNA at 0.25, 1, 3, 5, 7 days after transfection were 66.0%, 52.1%, 32.0%, 13.5% and 8.9%, respectively. After 7 days incubation with DEN, there was reduced cytopathic effect, increased cell survival rate (76.9 ± 4.5% vs 23.6 ± 14.6%) and reduced viral RNA copies (Ct value 19.91 ± 0.63 vs 14.56 ± 0.39) detected in transfected C6/36 cells.

Conclusions

Our data showed that synthetic siRNA against the DEN-1 membrane glycoprotein precursor gene effectively inhibited DEN-1 viral RNA replication and increased C6/36 cell survival rate. siRNA may offer a potential new strategy for prevention and treatment of DEN infection.

Background

Dengue viruses (DENs) are the wildest transmitted arbovirus members of the family Flaviviridae, genus Flavivirus, and compose four serotypes, DEN-1, 2, 3, and 4. As the etiologic agents, DENs can cause severe flu-like illness called dengue fever (DF), and sometimes lethal complication called dengue haemorrhagic fever (DHF) and dengue shock syndrome (DSS) [1, 2]. They transmit diseases to human beings primarily through mosquitoes, mainly Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus. With dramatically growth in recent decades, DF affects 100 million people and results in about 25,000 deaths annually, mostly in tropical and sub-tropical regions. DHF has become a leading cause of serious illness and death among children in some Asian countries [3]. Unfortunately, effective vaccines or therapies against the infection are still not available [4].

RNA interference (RNAi) is a sequence-specific RNA degradation process in the cytoplasm of eukaryotic cells triggered by double-stranded RNA (dsRNA), widely existing in many species from nematode to human [5–8]. Upon introduction into the cells, exogenous dsRNAs are cut into 21-25 nt small interfering RNA (siRNA) by an RNase III-like enzyme called Dicer. The siRNAs form RNA-induced silencing complex (RISC) with other cellular components, and lead to the cleavage of their homologous transcript and eventually the silencing of specific gene [9–11]. RNAi is believed to be an effective endogenous mechanism for host cells to defense against virus attack [12], and has been applied as an exogenous measure to inhibit viral replication, such as HIV [13, 14], influenza A virus [15], HBV [16] and SARS-CoV [17].

DEN is one of the first animal viruses that could be efficiently inhibited by RNAi [12, 18]. Like other flaviviruses, DEN generates intracellular dsRNA as an intermediate of their replication, which may induce RNAi in the host cells. A new explanation for mosquitoes' non-pathogenic and persistent infections of DEN is that RNAi could be an important modulator [19]. Exogenous long length dsRNA corresponding to DEN sequences, introduced by either plasmid or Sindbis viruses, has been proven to mediate RNAi in mosquito C6/36 Cells and lead to inhibition of DEN replication in cultured mosquito cells [20, 21]. Genetically modified Aedes aegypti has been raised to develop dengue virus resistance [22–24]. The mixtures of DEN specific small interfering RNAs, the hallmark of RNAi, were detected in all aforementioned studies. But little was known about the role of single siRNA with particular target sequence in the inhibition of DEN replication. Our present study was designed to investigate if a single siRNA has the inhibitory effect on DEN-1 replication in mosquito cells.

Results

Determination of effective siRNA sequence

Four siRNA sequences (table 1) against different parts of the DEN-1 genome were designed according to the gene sequences of DEN-1 epidemic strain GZ02-218 from Guangzhou City, China 2002(GenBank access No. EF079826), and DEN-1 reference strain (GenBank access No. EU848545). Only one siRNA (DenSi-1) transfected cells showed reduced CPE(< +) after 7 days post-infection (dpi), others showed ++++ CPE, as virus positive control cells did(Figure 1). DenSi-1 was selected for further investigation.

Table 1 sequences and positions of designed siRNA
Full size table
Figure 1
figure 1

CPE Difference in C6/36 cells transfected with four siRNAs. Four siRNA were transfected into C6/36 cells which were challenged by DEN-1. Only DenSi-1 (B) transfected cells showed less CPE(< +) at 7 dpi than cells transfected with other siRNAs. A: normal control group; B-E: siRNA treatment group (transfected with DenSi-1-4); F: siRNA control group; G: positive control group

Full size image

Effects of siRNA on C6/36 survival to DEN challenge

CPE in each group was observed at the 7th dpi. The virus positive control group and control siRNA group showed a large number of CPE up to ++++, characterized by cell swelling and fusing, and reduced cell number; while normal group and siRNA group showed no CPE and no observable decrease in cell number. The cell survival rate of C6/36 cells, measured by MTT assay, of siRNA group was 76.9% ± 4.5%, control-siRNA group was 43.9% ± 3.6%, and virus positive control group was 23.6% ± 14.6%. Compared with virus positive control group, the cell survival rate of siRNA group increased by 2.26-fold (n = 5, P < 0.05), but siRNA control group showed no significant difference (n = 5, P > 0.05) (Figure 2).

Figure 2
figure 2

Effects of siRNA on C6/36 cell survival rate. C6/36 cells were transfected with DenSi-1(B) or control siRNA(C), and challenged by DEN-1(B-D). CPEs were observed and cell survival rates were measured by MTT assay at the 7th dpi. Compared with virus positive control group, the cell survival rate of siRNA group increased by 2.26-fold (n = 5, P < 0.05), but siRNA control group showed no significant difference (n = 5, P > 0.05) A: normal control group; B: siRNA treatment group; C: siRNA control group; D: virus positive control group; Up: CPEs of C6/36 cells at the 7th dpi; Down: MTT assay results for C6/36 cells survival rate at the 7th dpi (n = 5). * P < 0.05, compared with virus positive control group.

Full size image

Effects of siRNA on viral loading in infected C6/36 cells

The amount of intracellular DEN-1 viral loading was detected by Real time RT-PCR at the 7th dpi. The CT value of DEN-1 RNA of siRNA group was 19.91 ± 0.63, control-siRNA group was 14.63 ± 0.91, virus-positive control group was 14.56 ± 0.39, and no viral RNA detectable in normal control group. Compared with the virus positive control group, siRNA group showed significant decrease of viral loading (n = 5, P < 0.05), but control siRNA group showed no significant difference (n = 5, P > 0.05) (table 2). The viral RNA amount of siRNA group was reduced for 25.34 fold (about 40 fold), the inhibition rate was 97.54%.

Table 2 DEN-1 viral RNA load in C6/36 cells at the 7th dpi (n = 5)
Full size table

siRNA transfection efficiency and stability

After transfection with FAM-labeled siRNA, fluorescent signals can be detected in more than half of C6/36 cells cytoplasm under a fluorescent microscope. During the incubation, the fluorescent intensity in the cells gradually decreased (Figure 1). And the percentage of FAM positive cell at 6 h, days 1, 3, 5, and 7 were 66.0%, 52.1%, 32.0%, 13.5%, and 8.9%, respectively, by flow cytometry (Figure 3).

Figure 3
figure 3

Stability of transfected siRNA in C6/36 cells. A: C6/C36 cells were transfected with 1.0 μg FAM-labeled DenSi-1 and cultured for 7 days. FAM fluorescence in the cells was observed under fluorescence microscope(×200); B: C6/36 cells transfected with FAM-labeled siRNAs were harvested at different time points as indicated, washed and resuspended with PBS (pH7.4). FAM fluorescence was quantified by flow cytometry and the percentage of fluorescence positive cells was measured. The rates of C6/36 cells containing FAM-labeled siRNA at 6 hours, 1, 3, 5, and 7 dpi were 66.0%, 52.1%, 32.0%, 13.5% and 8.9%, respectively.

Full size image

Discussion

As a rapid developing technology, RNAi has not only become a powerful tool for studying gene function and development of gene-based therapies, but also been widely used in anti-virus researches. Precious studies suggested that, at the molecular, cellular and individual levels, RNAi can potentially be used to block viral transmission and thus prevent the viral diseases [12, 18]. With the high efficiency, specificity and low cytotoxicity, RNAi offered a new promise of anti-viral therapy.

For ssRNA viruses such as DEN, there genomes are exposed within cytoplasm and become potential targets for RNAi. This likely happened at the moment between the uncoating of viral RNA and the viral replication [25]. Virus resistance has been proven to be generated by RNAi triggered from exogenous DEN-specific dsRNA. Adelman et al.[20] showed this resistance by a 290 nt dsRNA homologous to the type II dengue virus PrM gene which was expressed by plasmid, in cultured mosquito C6/36 cells. Travanty et al.[23] developed transgenic mosquito lines that transcribed the same 290 nt dsRNA with insect promoters, but failed to express in critical site for DEN replication such as midguts. Franz et al.[24] increased the size of dsRNA to 578 nt and succeeded in midgut expression and viral transmission diminishing. In addition to DEN-2, alternation of the replication kinetics of DEN-1 has also proven to be triggered by dsRNA in C6/36 cells [26].

However, long dsRNA fragments are associated with higher cost in synthesis, poorer stability, and raise the chance for mismatch rate. At the same time, introduction of dsRNAs longer than 30 base pairs into mammalian cells will activate the potent interferon and protein kinase R antiviral pathways, resulting in non-sequence-specific effects that can include apoptosis [27]. Therefore, these disadvantages largely restrict the use of long dsRNA in pre-clinical and clinical applications.

siRNAs are degraded products of dsRNA with 21-25 nt in length, and have no such disadvantages because of their short length. They are also described as "hallmark" of RNAi in all previously published papers. We hypotheses that the siRNA derived from the same fraction can have the same inhibitory effect as the dsRNA did. Therefore, in this study, we designed and synthesized 21 nt siRNAs against the DEN-I viral PrM gene, and investigated their inhibition effects of dengue virus replication in transfected C6/36 cells. In four siRNAs we designed, only one showed the function to reduce CPE after DEN infection. As expected, the location of this siRNA in DEN-1 is inside the corresponding location of 290 nt dsRNA reported before in DEN-2.

With transfection of the selected siRNA, C6/36 cells showed reduced CPE, and increased cell survival by 2.26 folds and eliminated viral RNA by about 97.54% compared to virus infection only group, at the 7th dpi. These data indicate that siRNA against DEN viral genome can effectively inhibit viral RNA replication in the C6/36 cells, protect host cell from viral attack, suggesting its potential role in prevention and treatment of dengue fever.

Recent study have shown [19] that Aedes aegypti can produce dsRNAs homologous to dengue viral genes and trigger an intrinsic siRNA anti-viral action, but this endogenous anti-viral mechanism can not effectively inhibit the replication of dengue virus. Data presented in our study revealed that exogenous siRNA in Aedes albopictus cells is effective in inhibiting viral DNA replication. Therefore, it is possible that the anti-viral mechanisms mediated by exogenous and endogenous siRNAs may act synergistically in the protection of cells from viral attacks, although this hypothesis needs further researches to prove.

Because the short siRNAs are unstable inside the cells, and also diluted by continuous cell division, the siRNA contents in the cells decline over time resulting in the weakening of interference effect. From the data in this study, siRNAs can be successfully transfected into 66% of the cells but this percentage gradually reduced with time and siRNA molecules only retained in 8.9% of the cells at the seventh day post transfection. Therefore, maintaining the continuity of RNA interference is crucial for the promotion and application of RNAi technology. Alternative form of vectors, such as retrovirus[28] and nano device[29], will be applied in the future.

Since currently there are no effective therapies or vaccines against Dengue fever, the use of RNAi to suppress dengue virus replication and protect cells from viral attacks will undutiful provide a new research strategy for the prevention and treatment of this disease.

Conclusions

Our data showed that synthetic siRNA against the DEN membrane glycoprotein precursor gene effectively inhibited DEN viral RNA replication and increased C6/36 cell survival rate. siRNA may offer a potential new strategy for prevention and treatment of DEN infection. The stability and inhibitory efficiency of siRNA need further improvement in the future.

Methods

1. Cell culture and virus replication

Type 1 DEN strain GZ02-218 and Aedes albopictus C6/36 cell line were both from the Department of Virology&Immunology in Guangzhou Center for Disease Control and Prevention. C6/36 cells were grown at 28°C, in Eagle's minimal essential medium (MEM, Gibco, USA) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS, Gibco, USA), 100 μg/mL penicillin and streptomycin, pH 7.4(maintain medium). Cells were passaged every 5 to 7 days to maintain exponential growth. DEN-1 strain GZ02-218 was passaged by infecting monolayers of C6/36 cells and viruses were harvested at 12-14 days. TCID50 of virus was measured for viral challenge.

2. siRNA design and synthesis

Four pairs of siRNAs against different parts DEN-1 viral genome were designed online (Qiagen, German) based on the common sequences of the epidemic strain GZ02-218 in Guangzhou City of China in 2002 (GenBank access number EF079826), DEN-1 reference virus strain (GenBank access number EU848545), and other DEN strains. Four siRNA fragments (DenSi-1~4) were synthesized and purified by PAGE electrophoresis (Ambion, USA). siRNAs was also labeled with FAM and purified for visualization after transfection (Ambion, USA). A siRNA fragment inconsistent containing sequence with DEN was used as the negative control (Qiagen, German).

3. Experimental groups

C6/36 cells were cultured in 24-well plate and divided into the following four groups based on different treatments: normal control group(A): cells received no siRNA transfection or viral infection; siRNA treatment group(B): cells transfected with siRNA and subsequently challenged by DEN-1 (GZ02-218); siRNA control group(C): cells transfected with the control siRNA having no common sequence with dengue virus genome and challenged by DEN-1; and virus positive control group(D): cells received no siRNA transfection but directly challenged by DEN-1. Every group contained 6 wells of cells.

4. siRNA transfection and viral infection

C6/36 cells were cultured in maintain medium at 28°C, and then inoculated in 24 well plates at 1 × 106 /well in 0.5 ml medium the day before transfection. When 80% ~ 90% cells grew into monolayer, they were transfected with siRNA molecules according to the manual for HiPerFect Transfection Reagent kit (Qiagen, German). 1.0 μg siRNA and 3 μl HiPerFect Transfection Reagent were used for each well. After cultured at 28°C for 4 hours, the medium with transfection reagent was removed. Cells were washed by MEM, challenged by 100 TCID50 DEN-1 and cultured at 33°C in maintain medium for further investigation.

5. CPE effects of Dengue virus on C6/36 cells

The cytopathic effect (CPE) of DEN-1 infection on C6/36 cells, including cell rounding, syncytium formation and cell death, was evaluated under a light microscope, and scored based on the severity from 0 (no CPE observed, no cell death) to the most severe level ++++ (CPE observed in 100% cells).

6. MTT assay for cell survival rate

At the 7th dpi, MTT assay was applied to measure cell viability. 100 μl MTT was added to every well and incubated for 4 hours then replaced with 1 ml DMSO. The 24-well plate was shaken at 37°C for 10 minutes and OD490 of every well was obtained in a microplate reader. The OD value obtained from the normal control group was set as 100% viability, and the cell survival rate of other groups was calculated as their respective OD value divided by that of the control group.

7. Real-time RT-PCR detection of dengue virus RNA in C6/36 cells

At the 7th dpi, C6/36 cells were collected and viral RNA was isolated with QIAamp Viral RNA Extraction Kit (Qiagen, German), and quantified with the dengue virus real-time fluorescent RT-PCR detection kit (Shenzhen Taitai Genomics, China). PCR reaction conditions were: one cycle of 50°C for 30 min and 95°C for 3 min, then 40 cycles of 95°C for 5 sec and 60°C for 40 sec. The relative amount of viral load in each group was represented by CT value, and the changes between groups were calculated by comparative CT (ΔCT) values.

8. Transfection efficiency and stability of siRNA

C6/36 cells were transfected with FAM-labeled siRNAs and cultured for 7 days. Fluorescence signal was observed under fluorescence microscope at 6 hours, 1, 3, 5, and 7 days. Cells were harvested at every time point, and measured by flow cytometry. siRNA positive cell rate was calculated as the percentage of cells containing fluorescent signals.

9. Statistical analysis

All values were presented as mean ± S.D. Statistical significance was evaluated using the two-tailed Mann-Whitney U-test; P < 0.05 was considered significant.

References

  1. WHO: World Health Organization: Dengue and Dengue Haemorrhagic Fever. Fact Sheet No. 117. Geneva 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kyle JL, Harris E: Global spread and persistence of dengue. Annu Rev Microbiol 2008, 62: 71-92. 10.1146/annurev.micro.62.081307.163005

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Halstead SB: Dengue virus-mosquito interactions. Annu Rev Entomol 2008, 53: 273-291. 10.1146/annurev.ento.53.103106.093326

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Whitehead SS, Blaney JE, Durbin AP, Murphy BR: Prospects for a dengue virus vaccine. Nat Rev Microbiol 2007,5(7):518-528. 10.1038/nrmicro1690

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Fire A, Xu S, Montgomery MK, Kostas SA, Driver SE, Mello CC: Potent and specific genetic interference by double-stranded RNA in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nature 1998, 391: 806-811. 10.1038/35888

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Montgomery MK, Xu S, Fire A: RNA as a target of double-stranded RNA mediated genetic interference in Caenorhabditis elegans. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1998, 95: 15502-15507. 10.1073/pnas.95.26.15502

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Elbashir SM, Lendeckel W, Tuschl T: RNA interference is mediated by 21- and 22-nucleotide RNAs. Genes Dev 2001, 15: 188-200. 10.1101/gad.862301

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Chiu YL, Rana TM: RNAi in human cells: basic structural and functional features of small interfering RNA. Molecular Cell 2002,10(3):549-561. 10.1016/S1097-2765(02)00652-4

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Hammond SM, Bernstein E, Beach D, Hannon GJ: An RNA-directed nuclease mediates post transcriptional gene silencing in Drosophila cells. Nature 2000,404(6775):293-296. 10.1038/35005107

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Meister G, Tuschl T: Mechanisms of Gene Silencing by Double-Stranded RNA. Nature 2004,431(7006):343-349. 10.1038/nature02873

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Mello CC, Conte D Jr: Revealing the World of RNA Interference. Nature 2004,431(7006):338-342. 10.1038/nature02872

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Haasnoot PC, Cupac D, Berkhout B: Inhibition of virus replication by RNA interference. J Biomed Sci 2003,10(6 Pt 1):607-616. 10.1007/BF02256311

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Song E, Lee SK, Dykxhoorn DM, Novina C, Zhang D, Crawford K, Cerny J, Sharp PA, Lieberman J, Manjunath N, Shankar P: Sustained small interfering RNA-mediated human immunodeficiency virus type 1 inhibition in primary macrophages. J Virol 2003,77(13):7174-7181. 10.1128/JVI.77.13.7174-7181.2003

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Lee SK, Dykxhoorn DM, Kumar P, Ranjbar S, Song E, Maliszewski LE, François-Bongarçon V, Goldfeld A, Swamy NM, Lieberman J, Shankar P: Lentiviral delivery of short hairpin RNAs protects CD4 T cells from multiple clades and primary isolates of HIV. Blood 2005,106(3):818-826. 10.1182/blood-2004-10-3959

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Sui HY, Zhao GY, Huang JD, Jin DY, Yuen KY, Zheng BJ: Small interfering RNA targeting m2 gene induces effective and long term inhibition of influenza A virus replication. PLoS One 2009,4(5):e5671. 10.1371/journal.pone.0005671

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Tang KF, Chen M, Xie J, Song GB, Shi YS, Liu Q, Mei ZC, Steinle A, Ren H: Inhibition of hepatitis B virus replication by small interference RNA induces expression of MICA in HepG2.2.15 cells. Med Microbiol Immunol 2009,198(1):27-32. 10.1007/s00430-008-0101-6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Shi Y, Yang DH, Xiong J, Jia J, Huang B, Jin YX: Inhibition of genes expression of SARS coronavirus by synthetic small interfering RNAs. Cell Res 2005,15(3):193-200. 10.1038/sj.cr.7290286

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Sánchez-Vargas I, Travanty EA, Keene KM, Franz AW, Beaty BJ, Blair CD, Olson KE: RNA silencing, Arthropod-borne virus and mosquitoes. Virus Research 102: 65-74. 10.1016/j.virusres.2004.01.017

  19. Sánchez-Vargas I, Scott JC, Poole-Smith BK, Franz AW, Barbosa-Solomieu V, Wilusz J, Olson KE, Blair CD: Dengue virus type 2 infections of Aedes aegypti are modulated by the mosquito's RNA interference pathway. PLoS Pathog 2009,5(2):e1000299. 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000299

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Adelman ZN, Sanchez-Vargas I, Travanty EA, Carlson JO, Beaty BJ, Blair CD, Olson KE: RNA Silencing of Dengue Virus Type 2 Replication in Transformed C6/36 Mosquito Cells Transcribing an Inverted-Repeat RNA Derived from the Virus Genome. J Virol 2002,76(24):12925-12933. 10.1128/JVI.76.24.12925-12933.2002

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Adelman ZN, Blair CD, Carlson JO, Beaty BJ, Olson KE: Sindbis Virus-Induced Silencing of Dengue Viruses in Mosquitoes. Insect Mol Biol 2001,10(3):265-273. 10.1046/j.1365-2583.2001.00267.x

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Olson KE, Adelman ZN, Travanty EA, Sánchez-Vargas I, Beaty BJ, Blair CD: Developing arbovirus resistance in mosquitoes. Insect Biochem Mol Biol 2002, 32: 1333-1343. 10.1016/S0965-1748(02)00096-6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Travanty EA, Adelman ZN, Franz AW, Keene KM, Beaty BJ, Blair CD, James AA, Olson KE: Using RNA interference to develop dengue virus resistance in genetically modified Aedes aegypti. Insect Biochem Mol Biol 2004, 34: 607-13. 10.1016/j.ibmb.2004.03.013

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Franz AW, Sanchez-Vargas I, Adelman ZN, Blair CD, Beaty BJ, James AA, Olson KE: Engineering RNA interference-based resistance to dengue virus type 2 in genetically modified Aedes aegypti . Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2006,103(11):4198-4203. 10.1073/pnas.0600479103

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Uchil PD, Satchidanandam V: Architecture of the flaviviral replication complex. J Biol Chem 2003,278(27):24388-24398. 10.1074/jbc.M301717200

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Caplen NJ, Zheng Z, Falgout B, Morgan RA: Inhibition of viral gene expression and replication in mosquito cells by dsRNA-triggered RNA interference. Mol Ther 2002, 6: 243-251. 10.1006/mthe.2002.0652

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Kumar M, Carmichael GG: Antisense RNA function and fate of duplex RNA in cells of higher eukaryotes. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 1998, 62: 1415-1434.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Nakamura Y, Kogure K, Futaki S, Harashima H: Octaarginine-modified multifunctional envelope-type nano device for siRNA. J Control Release 2007,119(3):360-7. 10.1016/j.jconrel.2007.03.010

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Nawtaisong P, Keith J, Fraser T, Balaraman V, Kolokoltsov A, Davey RA, Higgs S, Mohammed A, Rongsriyam Y, Komalamisra N, Fraser MJ Jr: Effective suppression of Dengue fever virus in mosquito cell cultures using retroviral transduction of hammerhead ribozymes targeting the viral genome. Virol J 2009.,6(73):

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by National Nature Science Foundation of China, Grant Number: 30872980, 30971208, 30973449; National Key Sci-Tech Special Project of China, Grant Number: 2008ZX10002-019, 2009ZX09103-642; Team Project of Nature Science Foundation of Guangdong Province, China, Grant Number: 06201946; Key Project of Nature Science Foundation of Guangdong Province, China, Grant Number: 10251008901000009; Sci-tech Research Project of Guangdong Province, China, Grant Number: 2008B030303041; Key Sci-tech Research Project of Guangzhou Municipality, China, Grant Number: 2006J1-C0141, 2008J1-C191, 2008Z1-E231; Medical Science and Technology Key Research Projects of Guangzhou Municipality, China, Grant Number: 2006-ZDi-10, 2008-ZDi-12. Program for Young Teacher in University, China, Grant Number: 10YKPY28.

Author information

Author notes

    Authors and Affiliations

    1. Guangzhou Center for Disease Control and Prevention, 23 Zhongshan 3rd Road, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510080, China

      Xinwei Wu, Jinya Yue, Yejian Wu, Xiangzhong Li & Liyun Jiang

    2. Department of Education of Guangdong Province, Key Laboratory of Functional Molecules from Marine Microorganisms (Sun Yat-sen University), 74 Zhongshan 2nd Road, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510080, China

      Xinwei Wu & Xia Yang

    3. Department of Neurology, The first hospital affiliated SunYat-sen University, 74 Zhongshan 2nd Road, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510080, China

      Hua Hong

    4. Department of Biochemistry, Zhongshan Medical School, Sun Yat-sen University, 74 Zhongshan 2nd Road, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510080, China

      Jinya Yue, Lei Li, Qiaoyan Li, Guoquan Gao & Xia Yang

    5. China Key Laboratory of Tropical Disease Control (Sun Yat-sen University), Ministry of Education, Guangzhou, 510080, China

      Guoquan Gao

    Authors
    1. Xinwei Wu
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    2. Hua Hong
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    3. Jinya Yue
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    4. Yejian Wu
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    5. Xiangzhong Li
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    6. Liyun Jiang
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    7. Lei Li
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    8. Qiaoyan Li
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    9. Guoquan Gao
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    10. Xia Yang
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    Corresponding authors

    Correspondence to Guoquan Gao or Xia Yang.

    Additional information

    Competing interests

    The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

    Authors' contributions

    WX and HH performed majority of the experiments and wrote the part of material and methods. YJ, WY and LX performed siRNA transfection experiments. JL, LL and LQ cooperated on cell and virus cultures. YX and GG designed the experiments and wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

    Xinwei Wu, Hua Hong and Xia Yang contributed equally to this work.

    Authors’ original submitted files for images

    Below are the links to the authors’ original submitted files for images.

    Authors’ original file for figure 1

    Authors’ original file for figure 2

    Authors’ original file for figure 3

    Rights and permissions

    Open Access This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

    Reprints and permissions

    About this article

    Cite this article

    Wu, X., Hong, H., Yue, J. et al. Inhibitory effect of small interfering RNA on dengue virus replication in mosquito cells. Virol J 7, 270 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1186/1743-422X-7-270

    Download citation

    • Received:

    • Accepted:

    • Published:

    • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1743-422X-7-270

    Keywords

    Virology Journal

    ISSN: 1743-422X