Multiplex Amplification Refractory Mutation System Polymerase Chain Reaction (ARMS-PCR) for diagnosis of natural infection with canine distemper virus
© Chulakasian et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010
Received: 11 March 2010
Accepted: 10 June 2010
Published: 10 June 2010
Canine distemper virus (CDV) is present worldwide and produces a lethal systemic infection of wild and domestic Canidae. Pre-existing antibodies acquired from vaccination or previous CDV infection might interfere the interpretation of a serologic diagnosis method. In addition, due to the high similarity of nucleic acid sequences between wild-type CDV and the new vaccine strain, current PCR derived methods cannot be applied for the definite confirmation of CD infection. Hence, it is worthy of developing a simple and rapid nucleotide-based assay for differentiation of wild-type CDV which is a cause of disease from attenuated CDVs after vaccination. High frequency variations have been found in the region spanning from the 3'-untranslated region (UTR) of the matrix (M) gene to the fusion (F) gene (designated M-F UTR) in a few CDV strains. To establish a differential diagnosis assay, an amplification refractory mutation analysis was established based on the highly variable region on M-F UTR and F regions.
Sequences of frequent polymorphisms were found scattered throughout the M-F UTR region; the identity of nucleic acid between local strains and vaccine strains ranged from 82.5% to 93.8%. A track of AAA residue located 35 nucleotides downstream from F gene start codon highly conserved in three vaccine strains were replaced with TGC in the local strains; that severed as target sequences for deign of discrimination primers. The method established in the present study successfully differentiated seven Taiwanese CDV field isolates, all belonging to the Asia-1 lineage, from vaccine strains.
The method described herein would be useful for several clinical applications, such as confirmation of nature CDV infection, evaluation of vaccination status and verification of the circulating viral genotypes.
Canine distemper is a highly contagious disease caused by canine distemper virus (CDV), which belongs to the genus Morbillivirus of the family Paramyxoviridae. Although CDV primarily infects canids, infection of other terrestrial and aquatic carnivores has been reported [1–7]. CDV infection causes a systemic disease with severe immunosuppression involving primary replication of the virus in macrophages and lymphocytes of the respiratory tract, as well as in various lymphoid tissues .
The genome of CDV is approximately 15.7 kb in length and consists of a single-stranded, negative-sense RNA encoding the following eight viral proteins: two transcriptase-associated proteins (the phosphoprotein P and the large protein L) and the nucleocapsid protein (N) that encapsidates the viral RNA, a single envelope-associated matrix (M) protein and two glycoproteins: haemagglutinin/attachment protein (H) and a fusion protein (F) . The F protein is responsible for viral fusion with host cells. The open reading frame of the F gene encodes 662 amino acids, which comprise a pre-signal peptide (Fsp), the F1 subunit and the F2 subunit; the latter two subunits are produced via post-translational proteolysis of the primary translation precursor product, designated pre-F0 [10, 11].
CDVs worldwide could be clustered into six major genetic lineages; America, European, Asia-1, Asia-2, Arctic, and Vaccine [12–16]. Over the last five decades, CDV isolates from the latter lineage, such as Onderstepoort, and Snyder Hill, were applied in vaccine production and used as conventional distemper vaccines [17, 18]. Recently, a new vaccine based on the contemporary vaccine strain (Vaccine X, GenBank: EU072198) has been used for immunisation. Sequence analysis, however, revealed that the contemporary strain used for Vaccine X is genetically distinct from the other CDVs in the vaccine lineage (used in conventional distemper vaccines).
Canine distemper is an incurable multisystemic viral disease that causes respiratory signs, gastrointestinal disorders, and progressive neurological signs. Prevention of CDV infection mainly relies on the use of live attenuated vaccines. Current routine serological tests detecting serum antibody titers are difficult to distinguish that animals have been vaccinated or late in infection as the modified live vaccines may result in a false positive in the first few weeks after immunisation. This rise the difficulties not only in the epidemic surveillance monitoring CDV outbreaks in domestic and wild animals, but also in the clinical diagnosis as a reference for treatment strategies, either continuing therapy or euthanasia. Recently, several molecular based assays have been established [12, 15, 19–21] to definitively clarify CDV infection. These molecular methods can only differentiate wild type and conventional vaccine strians. However, they are not able to identify the contemporary vaccine strain from the circulating wild type CDVs and thus it is possible that dogs vaccinated with the contemporary vaccine could be regarded as wild type CDV infection.
The goal of this study is to establish a simple and rapid assay for differentiating CDV of natural infection from that of vaccination which could be broadly adopted in countries where both conventional and contemporary distemper vaccines are commonly used in the vaccination program. Our previous report showed that there was a remarkable genetic diversity in the Fsp region among different CDV isolates , we further examined variation of Fsp and its upstream non-coding region (M-F untranslated region; M-F UTR) between circulating wild-type CDV and the vaccine strains in Taiwan. Toward this objective, CDVs from local isolates and three commonly used vaccines were sequenced and subjected to phylogenetic analysis. In addition, based on the determined divergent sequences, a multiplex ARMS-PCR system and enzyme recognition profile for the F gene and its upstream non-coding region were accordingly developed and successfully applied to the differentiation of vaccine strains and field isolates.
Sequence and phylogenetic analysis
To determine the phylogenetic relationships among of CDV field and vaccine strains, considering the limited sequence information of F gene from other countries, phylogenetic analysis of H gene was conducted to determine the lineage relationship of various CDV strains. Initially, full-length H gene sequences of the seven local CDV were identified (GenBank: FJ705230 to FJ705239). Consistent with our previous report , the local strains originated from CDV-Asia-1 lineage. Furthermore, unlike vacc-Q and Vacc-N (Onderstepoort strain), Vacc-P was distinct, placed near strains of America (additional file 1).
Comparison of the nucleotide sequences of field isolates from Taiwan with commercial CDV vaccines using the CDV M-F UTR and part of the F gene (nucleotides 4325-5325)
If these results are examined as a whole, all of the local isolates were found to be closely related to strains belonging to the Asia-1 lineage, which is distant and phylogenetically distinct from the vaccine strains. Additionally, the analysis of the three commercial vaccines indicated that two out of the three seem to have originated from a common ancestor similar to other vaccine strains (Onderstepoort and Convac), while only Vacc-P strain has a closer phylogenetic relationship with our local strains.
Differentiation of the vaccine strains and the field CDV isolates by Multiplex ARMS-PCR
Amplification refractory mutation system (ARMS)-PCR, also called allele-specific oligonucleotide PCR, was originally designed for the detection of known sequence polymorphisms, such as point mutations . Using just two pairs of primers in a single PCR tube, this method can simultaneously amplify both mutant and wild type alleles, plus it allows for the amplification of an internal DNA control. This technique has been applied to the genotyping, analysis of genetic disorders [25–27], and the diagnosis of several different virus infections [26, 28, 29]. The discrimination of amplification mainly depends on the mismatch nucleotide at the most 3'-terminus of primer . The allele-specific (or lineage-specific) priming of the PCR process will only permit amplification to occur when the most 3'-terminal nucleotide matches with its target sequences (Fig 1).
Alignment of the sequences revealed the substitution of three adenines at positions 530-532 in all three vaccine strains; while the sequences at the same positions in the local isolates are T/CGC (marked with square in Fig. 3A). Interestingly, this T/CGC, located 35 nucleotide downstream from Fsp start codon, also can be observed in other Asia-1 CDVs, including strains from Taiwan (49 strains) and China, published in GenBank database (Fig. 3B). This apparent variation allowed the design of a genotype-specific primer that would differentiate local strains from the vaccine strains. With this in mind, in order to increase the discrimination power, the last three nucleotides at the 3'-end of the forward F-wt and the reverse R-vacc primers were designed to specifically target this particular region of the wild type or field isolates, respectively. In addition, two universal outer primers, reverse R-wt and forward F-vacc were designed to act as primer pairs for nested ARMS-PCR amplification (Fig. 1).
Moreover, in order to further evaluate whether this multiplex assay can be used to characterise vaccine strains among the local strains, we performed PCR with the two sets of primers and different combinations of templates, such as one of the vaccine strains with or without the presence of a field isolate. The results consistently produced the correct 590 bp and 300 bp PCR products according to the templates present in the amplification (Fig. 4B). No cross-reactivity between the heterotypic primer pairs and the CDV strains was observed, this indicates that the multiplex ARMS-PCR is able to distinguish local isolates from vaccine strains even in a mixed population.
Base on the sequence homogeneity in agreement with the vaccine lineage, within the similar position of 590bp-product in other CDV strains from GenBank, three adenosines (AAA) located 35 nucleotide downstream from Fsp start codon, were observed in CDV isolates from Asia-2, America, Europe lineages (Fig. 3B), indicating that the forward F-vacc and reverse R-vacc primers, designed to circumstantially target AAA motif (Fig 1), are potentially able to amplify 590bp-products for recognition of these three CDV lineages. Thus, in order to specify these CDVs from vaccine strain, the further genotyping assay is needed to develop.
Genotyping of CDV vaccine strains by restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP)
Within 590 nucleotides, the recognition site of Bam H I was observed in contemporary vaccine, but not in CDV-Vaccine cluster. The RFLP analysis was performed to differentiate contemporary vaccine from other vaccine strains. As expected, a smaller fragment of 504 bp was detected from Vacc-P amplicon digested with Bam H I, whereas the other two vaccines remained undigested (Fig. 4C). Thus, these results indicated that the RFLP analysis may be applied for further characterized the contemporary vaccine strain from other vaccine strains.
In this study, differential ARMS-PCR and RFLP genotyping system were established on the basis of the genetic divergence spanning from the intergenic region of the M and F genes to the Fsp region of F gene. The level of genetic variation of the F gene between the vaccine and circulating CDV strains in Taiwan was documented in our previous study . Here we showed that, in addition to the F gene, low nucleotide similarity was found across the intergenic region of the M and F genes between the vaccine and field strains. Our results are consistent with a previous report, in which the genetic divergence of the M-F UTR was approximately two-fold higher than that of the most divergent coding sequence of the H gene .
Interference due to the presence of pre-existing antibodies produced by vaccination or a previous infection will affect the results of any serological diagnosis of CDV. In order to reinforce the interpretation resulting from serology based methods, the development of a method that allows the diagnosis and differentiation of CDV acquired by natural infection from that used for vaccination is worthwhile. Martella et al (2007) developed an RT-PCR genotyping system based on the lineage-specific nucleotide polymorphisms scattered over the H gene. Their system was used to characterise the major CDV lineages; European, Asia-1, Asia-2, Arctic, and Vaccine strains . However, because of limitations in primer design, this system was not able to amplify CDV belonging to the America cluster and vaccine X. Very recently, another multiplex PCR assays was reported by Si et al (2010); in which primers targeting H gene was designed to distinguish field strains from China and strains from vaccine cluster, i.e. Onderstepoort . Likewise, Uema et al (2005) reported that presence of Eco RV and Ssp I enzyme recognition sites of H gene in Asia strains was able to differentiate those without these sequences i.e. vaccine strains . However, within the same DNA fragment, the Ssp I site also found in Vacc-P and American CDVs (Data not shown), indicating that this method was not able to differentiate contemporary vaccine strains from CDVs in Asia-1 and Asia-2 lineages. Therefore, the PCR genotypic system and RFLP assay targeting on H gene described previously will be jeopardized when the vaccine derived from contemporary virus strain were generally conducted.
In this study, the highly conserved TGC at positions 530-532 in pre-signal peptide (Fsp) of the local strains (Fig. 3A) allowed us to design genotype specific primer pairs to distinguish local CDV strains (Asia-1) from three vaccines, including the contemporary strains (Fig. 1). As expected, the size difference between the vaccine specific and field strain specific products provided a simple and reliable method of identification and differentiation of CDV (Fig. 4A), even when mixed templates from field and vaccine strains were used (Fig. 4B). Although the identity of the Fsp amino acid sequence, when the Taiwan strains and vaccine strains are compared, was as low as 64-67% , surprisingly, an analysis of Fsp region in various CDV strains in GenBank database indicates that TGC motif used to specifically target local isolates is highly conserved among the Asia-1 lineage. These findings demonstrated that our assay will be able to reliably differentiate field CDV (Asia-1 lineage, as tested in present study) from the two major lineages of conventional vaccines, namely Vacc-N/Vacc-Q and contemporary vaccine, namely Vacc-P.
Comparison of the restriction enzyme profile within 590 nucleotide of non-coding region between M and F gene (nucleotide 4403-4492) in different CDV lineages.
Restriction enzyme recognition site
Expected size of fragments (base pair)
Bam H I
27, 40, 19, 504
27, 59, 196, 308
27, 59, 504
At present, control of CDV relies on immunisation with vaccines, mostly live attenuated vaccines. A multiplex ARMS-PCR assay developed in this study can be considered as a practical and robust tool for the rapid differentiation of current circulating CDV and vaccine strains based on the sequence polymorphism in the F gene and its upstream M-F UTR. When used clinically, this assay, for the first time, is able to effectively identify the origin of a CDV infection and, most importantly, confirm the presence of a natural CDV infection.
Sample collection and preparation
Regardless of vaccination history, seven isolates of CDV were obtained from dogs' nasal swabs with the clinical suspicion of canine distemper provided by the Veterinary Teaching Hospital of National Chung Hsing University and by the Taichung City Animal Protection and Health Inspection Center. Nasal swabs were homogenised in 1 ml of phosphate buffered saline (PBS) and then centrifuged at 8,000 g for 1 min. Supernatants were collected and kept at -80°C for further experiments. In addition, three live-attenuated commercial vaccines, Vacc-P, Vacc-N and Vacc-Q, all currently used in Taiwan, were also included in this study.
Purification of the nucleic acid, reverse transcription and amplification of F gene
Total nucleic acid was extracted from the supernatants of swabs and vaccines using the RNeasy Mini 50 kit (QIAGEN) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Total RNA (1 μg) and random 8-mer primers (50 μM) were denatured at 65°C for 5 min and cooled down on ice. To synthesise the first-strand cDNA, the RNA and primers were mixed in 5 × reaction buffers, 0.1 M DDT, 0.5 mM of each deoxynucleotide, 200 U SuperScript III reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen) and 40 U RNase inhibitor. A total of 20 μL of the mixture was initially incubated at 25°C, then the reaction was held at 65°C for 60 min and finally it was terminated by incubation at 70°C for 10 min. Following this, the first round amplification was conducted by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) with the outer primers CDF-F: 5'-AGAGTGCAAAATAGTAAGAATCCAAGC-3' and CDF-R: 5'-GAAAGAGACTGGCTATTCCGATGC-3', which amplified a fragment containing the M gene (115 downstream nucleotides; 4325-4439), M-F UTR (495 nucleotides; 4440-4934) and the F gene (first 391 nucleotides; 4935-5325) (Fig. 1). Thermocycling conditions for amplification started with an initial denaturation at 95°C for 5 min and then the reaction mixture was subjected to 35 cycles of heat denaturation at 95°C for 1 min, primer annealing at 55°C for 2 min, DNA extension at 72°C for 2 min; this was followed by a final extension at 72°C for 7 min. The identity of the resulting PCR products was verified by direct automated sequencing.
The Multiplex ARMS-PCR assay
The F gene products from the first round PCR were then further simultaneously amplified by multiplex ARMS-PCR using two primer sets in order to distinguish the vaccine and field strains. The specific primer sets, namely F-wt and R-vacc, were designed according to the different sequences obtained and specifically targeted either the field isolates or the vaccine strains (Fig. 1). The primers used for vaccine strain amplification were F-vacc: 5'- CATCAGCCATGATCAGGGTCTTTTC-3' and R-vacc: 5'-GGGCGGTCTTGTTGGGTATGTGTTT-3'. The primers used for field strain amplification were F-wt: 5'-AATTCCCAAAAAATCCAAACCCTGC-3' and R-wt: 5'-GATTGCCGCCTCTTGAACCAGGAA-3'. The amplification conditions for the multiplex-nested ARMS-PCR were 95°C for 5 min followed by 35 cycles of denaturation at 95°C for 1 min, annealing at 55°C for 2 min, DNA extension at 72°C for 2 min and a final extension at 72°C for 7 min. All amplification cycles were performed in a DNA thermal cycle (GeneAmp PCR system 2700). The PCR products were resolved by 1.2% agarose gel electrophoresis with Health safe nucleic acid stain. Product sizes were determined with reference to a 100 base pair (bp) DNA Ladder.
Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism (RFLP) analysis
For genotyping, the PCR product amplified with primers F-vacc and R-vacc was isolated by using the Purelink™ PCR purification kit (Invitrogen), and resulting product was further digested with restriction enzyme Bam H I (New England Biolabs). A 4 ml-aliquot was digested with 1.5 U of Bam H I at 37°C for 90 min according to the manufacturer's recommendation. The resulting restriction fragments were resolved by 1.2% Tris acetate-EDTA-agarose gel electrophoresis.
Several CDV strains were selected for phylogenetic analysis. The nucleotide sequence accession numbers in the GenBank database for the F gene and its upstream region, M-F UTR, sequences of the reference strains used in this study are: A75/17-USA (GenBank: AF164967), Raccoon 00-2601-USA (GenBank: AY443350), Raccoon 00-2689-USA (GenBank: AY649446), Raccoon 98-2646 (GenBank: AY542312), Raccoon 98-2654 (GenBank: AY466011), Raccoon 98-2645 (GenBank: AY445077) and Onderstepoort (GenBank: AF305419).
Nucleotide sequences corresponding to the CDV F and H genes were aligned using the CLUSTAL W multiple alignment method with BioEdit software  and compared with other previously published sequences reported in GenBank. The phylogeny of the nucleotide and amino acid alignments were analysed using distance matrix methods (DNADIST for nucleotide sequence and PROTDIST for amino acid sequence, followed by NEIGHBOR) using the PHYLIP software package . The datasets were subjected to bootstrap analysis based on 1,000 re-samplings of the original data and the SEQBOOT program was used to produce a majority-rule consensus tree.
The authors wish to thank Dr. Sarah M. Richart (Department of Biology and Chemistry, Azusa Pacific University, CA, USA) for editorial assistance and Taichung City Animal Protection and Health Inspection Center, Taichung, Taiwan for the sample collection. This study was supported by the Bureau of Animal and Plant Health Inspection and Quarantine, the Council of Agriculture (grant number: GA97104), and National Scientific Council (grant number: NSC96-2313-B-005-016-MY3), Taiwan.
- Appel MJ, Summers BA: Pathogenicity of morbilliviruses for terrestrial carnivores. Vet Microbiol 1995, 44: 187-191. 10.1016/0378-1135(95)00011-XPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Blixenkrone-Moller M, Svansson V, Have P, Orvell C, Appel M, Pedersen IR, Dietz HH, Henriksen P: Studies on manifestations of canine distemper virus infection in an urban dog population. Vet Microbiol 1993, 37: 163-173. 10.1016/0378-1135(93)90190-IPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gemma T, Watari T, Akiyama K, Miyashita N, Shin YS, Iwatsuki K, Kai C, Mikami T: Epidemiological observations on recent outbreaks of canine distemper in Tokyo area. J Vet Med Sci 1996, 58: 547-550.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Roelke-Parker ME, Munson L, Packer C, Kock R, Cleaveland S, Carpenter M, O'Brien SJ, Pospischil A, Hofmann-Lehmann R, Lutz H, et al.: A canine distemper virus epidemic in Serengeti lions (Panthera leo). Nature 1996, 379: 441-445. 10.1038/379441a0PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Barrett T: Morbillivirus infections, with special emphasis on morbilliviruses of carnivores. Vet Microbiol 1999, 69: 3-13. 10.1016/S0378-1135(99)00080-2PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Martella V, Pratelli A, Cirone F, Zizzo N, Decaro N, Tinelli A, Foti M, Buonavoglia C: Detection and genetic characterization of canine distemper virus (CDV) from free-ranging red foxes in Italy. Mol Cell Probes 2002, 16: 77-83. 10.1006/mcpr.2001.0387PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Guiserix M, Bahi-Jaber N, Fouchet D, Sauvage F, Pontier D: The canine distemper epidemic in Serengeti: are lions victims of a new highly virulent canine distemper virus strain, or is pathogen circulation stochasticity to blame? J R Soc Interface 2007, 4: 1127-1134. 10.1098/rsif.2007.0235PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Krakowka S: Mechanisms of in vitro immunosuppression in canine distemper virus infection. J Clin Lab Immunol 1982, 8: 187-196.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- von Messling V, Oezguen N, Zheng Q, Vongpunsawad S, Braun W, Cattaneo R: Nearby clusters of hemagglutinin residues sustain SLAM-dependent canine distemper virus entry in peripheral blood mononuclear cells. J Virol 2005, 79: 5857-5862. 10.1128/JVI.79.9.5857-5862.2005PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Cherpillod P, Zipperle L, Wittek R, Zurbriggen A: An mRNA region of the canine distemper virus fusion protein gene lacking AUG codons can promote protein expression. Arch Virol 2004, 149: 1971-1983.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Merz DC, Scheid A, Choppin PW: Importance of antibodies to the fusion glycoprotein of paramyxoviruses in the prevention of spread of infection. J Exp Med 1980, 151: 275-288. 10.1084/jem.151.2.275PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Martella V, Elia G, Lucente MS, Decaro N, Lorusso E, Banyai K, Blixenkrone-Moller M, Lan NT, Yamaguchi R, Cirone F, et al.: Genotyping canine distemper virus (CDV) by a hemi-nested multiplex PCR provides a rapid approach for investigation of CDV outbreaks. Vet Microbiol 2007, 122: 32-42. 10.1016/j.vetmic.2007.01.005PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bolt G, Jensen TD, Gottschalck E, Arctander P, Appel MJ, Buckland R, Blixenkrone-Moller M: Genetic diversity of the attachment (H) protein gene of current field isolates of canine distemper virus. J Gen Virol 1997,78(Pt 2):367-372.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Uema M, Ohashi K, Wakasa C, Kai C: Phylogenetic and restriction fragment length polymorphism analyses of hemagglutinin (H) protein of canine distemper virus isolates from domestic dogs in Japan. Virus Res 2005, 109: 59-63. 10.1016/j.virusres.2004.10.008PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hashimoto M, Une Y, Mochizuki M: Hemagglutinin genotype profiles of canine distemper virus from domestic dogs in Japan. Arch Virol 2001, 146: 149-155. 10.1007/s007050170198PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Demeter Z, Lakatos B, Palade EA, Kozma T, Forgach P, Rusvai M: Genetic diversity of Hungarian canine distemper virus strains. Vet Microbiol 2007, 122: 258-269. 10.1016/j.vetmic.2007.02.001PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Brown AL, Vitamvas JA, Merry DL Jr, Beckenhauer WH: Immune response of pups to modified live-virus canine distemper-measles vaccine. Am J Vet Res 1972, 33: 1447-1456.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Haig DA: Canine distemper: immunization with avianized virus. Onderstepoort J Vet Res 1956, 17: 19-53.Google Scholar
- Mochizuki M, Hashimoto M, Hagiwara S, Yoshida Y, Ishiguro S: Genotypes of canine distemper virus determined by analysis of the hemagglutinin genes of recent isolates from dogs in Japan. J Clin Microbiol 1999, 37: 2936-2942.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Schatzberg SJ, Li Q, Porter BF, Barber RM, Claiborne MK, Levine JM, Levine GJ, Israel SK, Young BD, Kiupel M, et al.: Broadly reactive pan-paramyxovirus reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction and sequence analysis for the detection of Canine distemper virus in a case of canine meningoencephalitis of unknown etiology. J Vet Diagn Invest 2009, 21: 844-849.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Si W, Zhou S, Wang Z, Cui S: A multiplex reverse transcription-nested polymerase chain reaction for detection and differentiation of wild-type and vaccine strains of canine distemper virus. Virol J 2010, 7: 86. 10.1186/1743-422X-7-86PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lee MS, Tsai KJ, Chen LH, Chen CY, Liu YP, Chang CC, Lee SH, Hsu WL: The identification of frequent variations in the fusion protein of canine distemper virus. Vet J 2010, 183: 184-190. 10.1016/j.tvjl.2008.10.001PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Chan KW, Hsieh HH, Wang HC, Lee YJ, Sung MH, Wong ML, Hsu WL: Identification, expression and antigenic analysis of recombinant hemagglutinin proteins of canine distemper virus. J Virol Methods 2009, 155: 18-24. 10.1016/j.jviromet.2008.09.024PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Newton CR, Graham A, Heptinstall LE, Powell SJ, Summers C, Kalsheker N, Smith JC, Markham AF: Analysis of any point mutation in DNA. The amplification refractory mutation system (ARMS). Nucleic Acids Res 1989, 17: 2503-2516. 10.1093/nar/17.7.2503PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Vannucchi AM, Pancrazzi A, Bogani C, Antonioli E, Guglielmelli P: A quantitative assay for JAK2(V617F) mutation in myeloproliferative disorders by ARMS-PCR and capillary electrophoresis. Leukemia 2006, 20: 1055-1060. 10.1038/sj.leu.2404209PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Chen Q, Lu P, Jones AV, Cross NC, Silver RT, Wang YL: Amplification refractory mutation system, a highly sensitive and simple polymerase chain reaction assay, for the detection of JAK2 V617F mutation in chronic myeloproliferative disorders. J Mol Diagn 2007, 9: 272-276. 10.2353/jmoldx.2007.060133PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Newton CR, Heptinstall LE, Summers C, Super M, Schwarz M, Anwar R, Graham A, Smith JC, Markham AF: Amplification refractory mutation system for prenatal diagnosis and carrier assessment in cystic fibrosis. Lancet 1989, 2: 1481-1483. 10.1016/S0140-6736(89)92931-0PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gramegna M, Lampertico P, Lobbiani A, Colucci G: Detection of the hepatitis B virus major pre-core mutation by the amplification refractory mutation system technique. Res Virol 1993, 144: 307-309. 10.1016/S0923-2516(06)80046-4PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Liang TJ, Bodenheimer HC Jr, Yankee R, Brown NV, Chang K, Huang J, Wands JR: Presence of hepatitis B and C viral genomes in US blood donors as detected by polymerase chain reaction amplification. J Med Virol 1994, 42: 151-157. 10.1002/jmv.1890420210PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Liermann H, Harder TC, Lochelt M, von Messling V, Baumgartner W, Moennig V, Haas L: Genetic analysis of the central untranslated genome region and the proximal coding part of the F gene of wild-type and vaccine canine distemper morbilliviruses. Virus Genes 1998, 17: 259-270. 10.1023/A:1008069805011PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hall TA: BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symp Ser 1999, 41: 95-99.Google Scholar
- Felsenstein J: PHYLIP - Phylogeny Inference Package (Version 3.2). Cladistics 1989, 5: 164-166.Google Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.