Open Access

The role of mutations in core protein of hepatitis B virus in liver fibrosis

  • Ashraf Mohamadkhani1, 2Email author,
  • Ferdous Rastgar Jazii1,
  • Hossein Poustchi2,
  • Omidreza Nouraein1,
  • Shahsanam Abbasi1,
  • Masoud Sotoudeh2 and
  • Ghodratollah Montazeri2
Virology Journal20096:209

https://doi.org/10.1186/1743-422X-6-209

Received: 4 August 2009

Accepted: 26 November 2009

Published: 26 November 2009

Abstract

The core protein of hepatitis B virus encompasses B- and T-cell immunodominant epitopes and subdivided into two domains: the N-terminal and the functional C-terminal consisted phosphorylation sites. Mutations of the core gene may change the conformation of the core protein or cause alteration of important epitopes in the host immune response. In this study twenty nine men (mean age 40 ± 9 years old) with chronic hepatitis B were recruited for direct sequencing of the core gene. Serum ALT and HBV DNA level were measured at the time of liver biopsy. The effects of core protein mutations on patients' characteristics and subsequently mutations in B cell, T helper and cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) epitopes and also C-terminal domain of core protein on the activity of liver disease was evaluated. Liver fibrosis was significantly increased in patients with core protein mutation (1.0 ± 0.8 vs 1.9 ± 1.4 for mean stage of fibrosis P = 0.05). Mutations in CTL epitopes and in phosphorylation sites of C-terminal domain of core protein also were associated with higher liver fibrosis (P = 0.003 and P = 0.04; Fisher's exact test for both). Patients with mutation in C-terminal domain had higher serum ALT (62 ± 17 vs 36 ± 12 IU/l, p = 0.02). Patients with mutations in B cell and T helper epitopes did not show significant difference in the clinical features. Our data suggests that core protein mutations in CTL epitopes and C-terminal domain accompanied with higher stage of liver fibrosis may be due to alterations in the function of core protein.

Introduction

Worldwide, the 350 million people with chronic hepatitis B have a 15-25% risk of dying from HBV-related liver diseases, including cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma [1]. It is evident that 70-84% of cirrhotic patients and 72% of individuals with hepatocellular carcinoma in Iran have evidence of exposure to HBV [2].

Naturally occurring mutations of hepatitis B virus (HBV) genome have an important role in the activity of HBV related liver diseases. Patients with long standing active liver disease are at high risk to develop liver cirrhosis or hepatocellular carcinoma [3]. The genome of hepatitis B virus encodes four overlapping open reading frames that are translated to viral core protein or HBc particle, the surface proteins, a reverse transcriptase (RT), and HBx [4]. The core protein is the major polypeptide of the nucleocapsid that during virus assembly polymerizes around a complex consisting of pregenomic mRNA and viral polymerase [5]. Core protein with genotype D which is frequent in Iran [6] holding 183 amino acids with a set of closely linked α-helices [7] and consists of two distinct domains, an N-terminal domain with 144 residues required for the assembly of the 32 nm nucleocapsid and a functional C-terminal domain [5, 8]. Empty core shells made from truncated HBc at residue 149 revealed the important role of C-terminal in viral genome binding and nuclear transport of the core protein [911]. The C-terminal arginine-rich domain with a high similarity to protamin, consists of three repeated SPRRR motifs corresponded to the part of core protein that interact closely with RNA [5]. In this domain phosphorylated site residues located in amino acid sequences 155-183. Immature nucleocapsids which contain RNA are phosphorylated at six sites, while the mature nucleocapsids which contain DNA are completely dephosphorylated either inside cells or in extracellular virions [9]. This phosphorylation clearly plays an important role in the regulation of the function of C-terminal core protein [10, 12]. Regard to HBc particles include into the HBV vaccines it can be demonstrated that core protein is a major target for antiviral immune response [13]. There is evidence that the HBc represents an important target for immune mediated viral clearance [14] by inducing B cell, T helper cell and cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) responses [15]. Important recognition sites of the core protein are represented by the amino acid sequences 18-27, 88-96 and 141-151 for the CTL epitopes and amino acid sequences 1-20, 28-47, 50-69, 72-105 and 108-165 for T helper epitopes [1517]. The immunodominant B cell recognition sites within HBcAg have been found around residues 74-89 and 126-135 [15, 16]. Mutations in both B- and T-cell epitopes associated with viral persistence[16, 18] influencing the host immune response and also the natural course of infection [19]. Previous studies showed that mutations in the region of the CTL epitopes promoted the immune selection pressure accompanied with particular clinical manifestations [20, 21]. The Inflammatory activity produced by viral adaptive mechanism may persist in up to 15% of cases, leading to the development of cirrhosis [22].

Mutations in the functional C-terminal domain of the core protein might impact on other biochemical properties of this protein that have not been studied well. Considering the importance of the C-terminal core protein during viral replication that might be in interaction with some cellular proteins, our study objectives were to provide a pilot data in a group of male patients with chronic hepatitis B for the presence of mutations in the C-terminal of the core protein as well as in B cell, T helper and CTL epitopes of HBV core gene sequence and the effects of these mutations on the clinical, biochemical and virological parameters of patients. We also employed a computational prediction approach to define the function of the core protein.

Materials and methods

Human Subjects and Clinical Assessment

Chronic hepatitis B patients with HBeAg negative attending the Hepatitis Clinic of Shariati Hospital were evaluated. Twenty nine male subjects with detectable HBV DNA and candidate for liver biopsy were enrolled for the analysis of the prevalence of HBc mutations. The assessed laboratory parameters were included serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and viral load measured by standard methods. Serological markers for HBsAg, HBeAg were tested using commercially available enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kits from RADIM (Italy). Liver biopsies from all patients were performed to define the stage of fibrosis using the modified HAI scoring system [23]. Serum samples were collected at the initial assessment before liver biopsy. Concurrence of hepatitis C virus and human immunodeficiency virus infections and autoimmune liver disease was excluded for all enrolled individuals. None of the patients received antiviral treatment prior to liver biopsy. Study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of our unit.

Quantitative HBV DNA Assay and Direct Sequencing of Core Protein

HBV DNA was extracted from 200 μl of serum using QIAamp DNA Blood Mini Kit (QIAGEN USA). HBV DNA was then quantified in the Light-Cycler (Roche) using the RealART™ HBV LC PCR (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany) according to the manufacturer's instructions. To amplify the nucleotide sequence encoding HBcAg, a pair of primers designed for PCR, the forward primer (position 374-392): 5'-TAGGAGGCTGTAGGCATAA-3' and the reverse primer (Position 1095-1114): 5'-GAACAGTAGAAGAATAAAGC-3'. Sequences were obtained by direct sequencing of a fresh PCR product on an ABI automated sequencer following concentration using a QIAEX II protocol (Qiagen, Crawley, UK).

Analysis of Core Protein by Bioinformatics Tools

Deduced amino acid sequences of 29 core genes were aligned using CLUSTALX developed by the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI, Bethesda, MD). Sequence similarity was assessed using BLASTP (NCBI, Bethesda, MD) with searching protein sequence databases. The nature of the kinase to interact with core protein was predicted by NetPhosK as a kinase-specific phosphorylation site predictor (online at http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/NetPhosK/). The biological function process of core protein was predicted by Protein Function Prediction (PFP) Version 2.0 beta release (online at http://dragon.bio.purdue.edu/pfp).

Statistical Analysis

Continuous variables were compared using an independent t-test and categorical variables were compared using Fisher's exact test. The data are expressed as the mean ± SD. SPSS for Windows Version 14 (SPSS Inc, Chicago, USA) was used for all analyses. Two-tailed P value of < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.

Results

Clinical, Laboratory, and Virological Data of the Patients

The study group included 29 male subjects with a mean of 42 ± 9 years old. All patients had liver biopsies with the average length of 1.6 ± 0.8 cm and portal triads numbered 9 ± 6 per biopsy. HAI score and stage of fibrosis had a mean of 5.7 ± 2.4 and 1.6 ± 1.3 respectively (Table 1). Deduced amino acid sequences encoding the core protein of HBV from 29 patients against HBV genotype D consensus sequence showed that all patients were infected with genotype D. Nineteen of 29 (65.5%) patients had amino acid mutations in the full length of core protein while mutations in the phosphorylation site of the C-terminal were detected in 5 (17.5%). Amino acid residues 77, 80, 130 and 135 corresponded to B cell epitopes, amino acid residues 12, 35, 38, 64, 66, 113 and 116 to T helper epitopes and amino acid residues 93, 147 and 151 restricted to CTL epitopes [15, 20]. Positions of mutations in deduced amino acid residues compared to consensus residue of genotype D in 29 patients are shown in Table 2.
Table 1

Analysis of clinical factors in relation to the presence of mutations in the core protein in 29 patients with chronic hepatitis B virus infection

Clinical factor

All patients (n = 29)

Wild Type

(n = 10)

Mutant

(n = 19)

P value

Age* (Years)

42 ± 9

43 ± 8

41 ± 9

0.5

ALT* (IU/l)

41 ± 16

34 ± 13

44 ± 16

0.09

HBV DNA*

(Log copies/ml)

4.2 ± 0.8

4.0 ± 0.9

4.3 ± 0.8

0.4

HAI score*

5.7 ± 2.4

5.1 ± 2.2

6.1 ± 2.4

0.2

Stage of Fibrosis*

1.6 ± 1.3

1.0 ± 0.8

1.9 ± 1.4

0.05

*Mean ± SD

Table 2

Amino Acid mutation of HBc sequence deviated from HBV core gene.

 

T helper epitopes

CTL epitopes

B cell epitopes

C-terminal

subject

T12

S35

Y38

E64

M66

E113

I116

M93

T147

R151

E77

A80

P130

P135

S176

S181

1

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

2

-

-

-

D

I

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

P

3

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

4

-

-

F

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Q

-

-

-

-

-

5

S

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

V

A

-

6

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

T

-

-

-

-

7

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

8

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

V

-

-

-

V

-

-

-

-

9

-

-

-

D

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

P

10

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

11

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

T

-

-

-

V

-

-

-

-

12

-

T

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

13

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

14

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

15

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

16

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Q

-

-

-

17

-

-

-

D

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

18

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

19

-

-

F

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

P

20

-

-

-

-

-

-

L

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

21

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

22

-

-

-

D

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Q

-

-

23

S

-

-

-

I

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Q

-

-

-

24

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

25

-

-

F

-

-

-

-

-

-

R

-

-

-

-

-

P

26

-

-

-

-

-

Q

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

27

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

T

-

-

-

V

-

-

-

-

28

-

T

-

D

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

29

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

C

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Frequency (%)

2(6.9)

2(6.9)

3(10.3)

5(17.2)

2(6.9)

1(3.4)

1(3.4)

3(10.3)

1(3.4)

1(3.4)

1(3.4)

4(13.8)

2(6.9)

2(6.9)

1(3.4)

4(13.8)

The consensus sequence of genotype D is shown in the first line. Dashes represent residues identical to the reference residues.

Association of Core Protein Mutations with the Outcome of HBV Infection

Comparisons of various clinical features in terms of the presence of mutations in the core protein are presented in Table 1. The presence of mutations in core protein was associated with higher serum ALT although this was not significant. However liver fibrosis significantly increase in patients with core protein mutation (1.0 ± 0.8 vs 1.9 ± 1.4 P = 0.05). When the Immunodominant epitopes and C-terminal domain of HBV core protein were separately analyzed the mutation of CTL epitopes showed higher viral replication (4.1 ± 0.8 vs 4.9 ± 0.7 log copies/ml, p = 0.05). There was no significant difference in the clinical features of patients with mutation in B cell and T helper epitopes. We observed a significantly increased serum ALT of patients with mutations in C-terminal domain (36 ± 12 vs 62 ± 17 IU/I, P = 0.02). Table 3 presented the clinical findings of chronic hepatitis B patients in correlation with mutations in Immunodominant epitopes and C-terminal domain of HBV core protein. The mean of HAI score and fibrosis stage in subjects with mutations in C-terminal domain when compared with those without this mutations were 7.6 ± 2.2 vs 5.3 ± 2.2, p = 0.06 and 3.4 ± 1.1 vs 1.3 ± 0.7, p = 0.02. However, we found no significant difference between the mean score of HAI and fibrosis stage with mutations in CTL epitopes.
Table 3

The correlation of mutations in Immunodominant epitopes and C-terminal domain of HBV core protein with clinical finding of 29 chronic hepatitis B patients

 

Immunodominant epitopes

Wild type/Mutant**

Wild type/Mutant**

Mutation site

B cell

P*

CTL

P*

T helper

P*

C-terminal domain

P*

Frequency (%)

20/9 (68/32)

 

24/5 (82/17)

 

16/13 (55/45)

 

24/5 (82/17)

 

Age (Years)

42 ± 8/40 ± 9.6

0.5

42 ± 8.3/38 ± 9.3

0.3

42 ± 8.7/41 ± 8.5

0.5

41 ± 8/44 ± 10

0.6

ALT (IU/l)

42 ± 18/38 ± 11

0.4

39 ± 14/48 ± 21

0.4

35 ± 13/47 ± 17

0.06

36 ± 12/62 ± 17

0.02

HBV DNA

(Log copies/ml)

4.2 ± 0.7/4.2 ± 1

0.9

4.1 ± 0.8/4.9 ± 0.7

0.05

4.3 ± 0.9/4.2 ± 0.7

0.6

4.2 ± 0.9/4.5 ± 0.3

0.2

HAI score

6 ± 2.4/5.2 ± 2.4

0.4

5.4 ± 2.3/7.4 ± 2.1

0.1

5.6 ± 2/5.8 ± 2.8

0.6

5.3 ± 2.2/7.6 ± 2.2

0.06

Stage of Fibrosis

1.7 ± 1.3/1.4 ± 1

0.4

1.3 ± 1/2.8 ± 1.4

0.3

1.3 ± 0.9/1.9 ± 1.5

0.2

1.3 ± 0.7/3.4 ± 1.1

0.02

*t Test. **Mean ± SD

To examine the relationship of these mutations with the stage of fibrosis, patients were classified based on the score of liver fibrosis less and more than 2 (set as cut off point). As illustrated in Table 4, statistical analysis of the relationships between the mutations in the core gene and the stage of fibrosis showed that mutations in C-terminal domain with codon 181 being most frequently affected were significantly associated with development of liver fibrosis. Mutations in CTL epitopes of core protein also associated with higher liver fibrosis (P = 0.003 and P = 0.04; Fisher's exact test for both).
Table 4

The relationships between the mutations in the core gene and the Stage of fibrosis

Core region

Stage of Fibrosis

Patients with mutation in core protein

(n = 19)

 

Mutations in:

Mean ± SD

Fibrosis score <2(%)

Fibrosis score >2 (%)

P-value*

Core protein

1.9 ± 1.3

13(68)

6(32)

0.06

T helper epitopes

1.9 ± 1.5

9(69)

4(31)

0.3

CTL epitopes

2.8 ± 1.4

2(40)

3(60)

0.04

B cell epitopes

1.4 ± 1.1

7(77)

2(23)

1.0

C-terminal domain

3.4 ± 1.1

1(20)

4(80)

0.003

*Fisher's exact test P-value

#Number (%)

Functional Analysis of Core Protein

Core protein with the largest number of serine sites in C-terminal tail could be widely phosphorylated by kinases. Amino acid residues 176 and 181 which were defined as mutation sites in current study had high score performance value for different kinases presented by NetPhosK predictor. PFP algorithm searched conventional databases with relative probability of Gene Ontologies (GO) to predict the most probable GO annotations in three Biological Process (BP), Molecular Function (MF) and Cellular Component (CC) categories which is presented in Fig. 1 and Table 5. According to this prediction the feature of viral nucleocapsid with the highest score of 73709 in CC category related to the full length of core protein while the function of core protein in two other categories BP and MF limited to C-terminal domain.
Figure 1

Predicted GO annotations for HBV core protein sequence, The PFP algorithm scored GO terms individually and includes information from distantly related sequences to HBV core protein. The function of each GO has been shown in table 5.

Table 5

Prediction scores for top 5 predictions function of HBV core protein in each GO category

GO term

Short Def

Raw Score

Term Type

GO0030154

cell differentiation

13589.15

BP

GO0007399

neurogenesis

11229.85

BP

GO0042981

regulation of apoptosis

9909.73

BP

GO0006916

anti-apoptosis

5241.9

BP

GO0006633

fatty acid biosynthesis

4198.2

BP

GO0003723

RNA binding

11434.09

MF

GO0005083

small GTPase regulatory/interacting protein activity

4155.72

MF

GO0000166

nucleotide binding

3985.78

MF

GO0046872

metal ion binding

3868.07

MF

GO0008987

quinolinate synthetase A activity

3672.6

MF

GO0019013

viral nucleocapsid

73709.99

CC

GO0009507

chloroplast

6016.97

CC

GO0005739

mitochondrion

3530.83

CC

GO0016021

integral to membrane

3426.14

CC

GO0016528

sarcoplasm

2591.69

CC

Discussion

Mutant HBV could display enhanced virulence with increased levels of HBV replication, or alteration of epitopes which is important in the host immune response. Sequence variation in core protein is one of the powerful viral strategies for escaping recognition by the host's immune response linked to virus persistence or severity of chronic hepatitis B infection [18]. The reason for selection of amino acid changes in hepatitis B virus proteins, as well as their functional or immunological relevance is speculative [24]. Through the evolution, most functional DNA is expected to have attained a sequence that is near optimal for its environment [25]. Previous work from Iran has indicated a high nucleotide identity for HBV isolates from 98.4 to 100% [6] in overall that suggests mutations in the HBV core gene sequence were more likely resulted from natural selection during the course of infection.

We detected mutations in immunedominant epitopes and C-terminal domain of core protein in 65.5% of our patients with chronic hepatitis B. The results revealed increased liver fibrosis in patients with mutation in both C-terminal domain and CTL epitopes. The mean of fibrotic stage found to be highest in patients with mutations in phosphorylation sites of C-terminal domain. Patients with mutations in the CTL epitopes accompanied with active viral replication. A proposed mechanism for this observation is that selection of mutations in the CTL epitopes alters core antigenicity that results in not to be recognized by the corresponding immune response and consequently induce a new immune response as evidenced by the high levels of HBV DNA recorded in such cases. Patients with mutation in C-terminal domain of core protein had higher level of ALT than their counterparts. Elevated aminotransferase values reflect increased histologic necroinflammatory disease activity.

The structure of core protein is largely α-helical rods with C-terminal basic tail that interact closely with viral RNA pregenome or the viral DNA genome [11]. The C-terminal of the core protein is highly conserved with repetitive structure that is required for many aspects of viral production. This may be due to its functional significance, as well as to the overlapping P gene [8, 10]. HBV core protein appears as a phosphoprotein and many kinases have been reported to be associated with viral capsid [26]. This was confirmed by NetPhosK predictor tool in which C-terminal of core protein is phosphorylated by multiple protein kinases to interact with intracellular protein. Phosphorylation is the most important and best understood modification to modulate protein activity and signal propagation for homeostasis processes like cell cycle progression, differentiation, development and peptide hormone response [27]. The maturation stage of the HBV has been shown to be correlated to the phosphorylation state of core molecules [12]. This phosphorylation clearly plays an important role in the regulation of C-terminal domain function [28].

To explain the effect of mutations of core protein in the biological process of the cell, we predicted the major functions of the core protein of hepatitis B virus. Protein prediction function showed that viral nucleocapsid activity has the highest score for the whole of HBc molecule in cellular component GO category (Fig. 1). This is consistent with experimental data that the HBc sequence 1-144 was sufficient for self assembly and HBV pregenome encapsidation but not for binding to the viral pregenome or the viral DNA genome and the production of relaxed circular HBV DNA [5, 10].

Furthermore, other predicted functions of HBc were limited to C-terminal domain which is rich in phosphorylation sites (Fig. 1). We suggested that the molecular function and biological process of core protein are more affected by mutations mainly in phosphrylation sites of C-terminal domain. Usuda et al showed that HBV core proteins (p21c) from symptom-free carriers have a higher extent of phosphorylation than hepatitis patients [29] which is consistent with our finding in this study. In this study, 4 out of 5 mutations in the phosphorylation sites of the C-terminal core protein related to a proline replacing a serine residue at position 181 that is particularly frequent in HBV of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma or end stage liver disease [30, 31]. It was demonstrated by Kim et al, that the intracellular level of HBx can be downregulated by HBc via a novel mechanism involving the activation of the proteasome-mediated degradation of HBx. They showed that the C-terminal half of HBc is responsible for its inhibitory effect and suggested that HBc act as a novel regulator of the HBV life cycle and hepatocellular carcinogenesis [32]. Mutation of phosphorylation sites in the C-terminal domain might change the regulatory effects of HBc on HBx and consequensing HBx-mediated apoptosis that could be interpreted by predicted apoptotic regulatory function of HBc. Some unknown secondary structure as a result of mutation in the core protein may determine its role in the biological function and replication of hepadnavirus. Additional in vivo studies for the effects of core protein mutations on cellular function are required to determine its precise impact on the development of liver fibrosis. These findings may provide useful insights for the design of improved drug for the treatment of HBV infection.

Conclusion

In conclusion, HBV populations with combinations of mutations in phosphorylation site in C-terminal domain and CTL epitopes of core protein were associated with more severe liver fibrosis.

Abbreviations used in this paper

(HBV): 

Hepatitis B virus

(CHB): 

Chronic hepatitis B

(CTL): 

Cytotoxic T lymphocyte.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by National Institute of Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology Tehran, Iran.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
National Institute of Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology
(2)
Digestive Disease Research Centre, Medical Science/University of Tehran, Shariati Hospital

References

  1. Margolis HS, Alter MJ, Hadler SC: Hepatitis B: evolving epidemiology and implications for control. Semin Liver Dis 1991, 11: 84-92. 10.1055/s-2008-1040427View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Lankarani KB, Nabipoor I: Reassessment of the role of hepatitis B and C viruses in postnecrotic cirrhosis and chronic hepatitis in southern Iran. Irn J Med Sci 1999, 24: 117-121.Google Scholar
  3. Lim YS, Kim WR: The global impact of hepatic fibrosis and end-stage liver disease. Clin Liver Dis 2008, 12: 733-746. 10.1016/j.cld.2008.07.007View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Seeger C, Mason W, Zoulim F: Hepadnaviruses. In Fields virology. Edited by: Knipe DM, Howley PM. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2007:2977-3029.Google Scholar
  5. Nassal M: The arginine-rich domain of the hepatitis B virus core protein is required for pregenome encapsidation and productive viral positive-strand DNA synthesis but not for virus assembly. J Virol 1992, 66: 4107-4116.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Poustchi H, Mohamadkhani A, Bowden S, Montazeri G, Ayres A, Revill P, Farrell GC, Locarnini S, George J, Malekzadeh R: Clinical significance of precore and core promoter mutations in genotype D hepatitis B-related chronic liver disease. J Viral Hepat 2008, 15: 753-760. 10.1111/j.1365-2893.2008.00998.xView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Wynne SA, Crowther RA, Leslie AG: The crystal structure of the human hepatitis B virus capsid. Mol Cell 1999, 3: 771-780. 10.1016/S1097-2765(01)80009-5View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Seifer M, Standring DN: A protease-sensitive hinge linking the two domains of the hepatitis B virus core protein is exposed on the viral capsid surface. J Virol 1994, 68: 5548-5555.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Machida A, Ohnuma H, Tsuda F, Yoshikawa A, Hoshi Y, Tanaka T, Kishimoto S, Akahane Y, Miyakawa Y, Mayumi M: Phosphorylation in the carboxyl-terminal domain of the capsid protein of hepatitis B virus: evaluation with a monoclonal antibody. J Virol 1991, 65: 6024-6030.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Zlotnick A, Cheng N, Stahl SJ, Conway JF, Steven AC, Wingfield PT: Localization of the C terminus of the assembly domain of hepatitis B virus capsid protein: implications for morphogenesis and organization of encapsidated RNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1997, 94: 9556-9561. 10.1073/pnas.94.18.9556PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Roseman AM, Berriman JA, Wynne SA, Butler PJ, Crowther RA: A structural model for maturation of the hepatitis B virus core. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2005, 102: 15821-15826. 10.1073/pnas.0504874102PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Perlman DH, Berg EA, O'Connor PB, Costello CE, Hu J: Reverse transcription-associated dephosphorylation of hepadnavirus nucleocapsids. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2005, 102: 9020-9025. 10.1073/pnas.0502138102PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. La Torre G, Nicolotti N, de Waure C, Chiaradia G, Specchia ML, Mannocci A, Ricciardi W: An assessment of the effect of hepatitis B vaccine in decreasing the amount of hepatitis B disease in Italy. Virol J 2008, 5: 84. 10.1186/1743-422X-5-84PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Chisari FV: Rous-Whipple Award Lecture. Viruses, immunity, and cancer: lessons from hepatitis B. Am J Pathol 2000, 156: 1117-1132.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Pumpens P, Grens E: HBV core particles as a carrier for B cell/T cell epitopes. Intervirology 2001, 44: 98-114. 10.1159/000050037View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Bozkaya H, Ayola B, Lok AS: High rate of mutations in the hepatitis B core gene during the immune clearance phase of chronic hepatitis B virus infection. Hepatology 1996, 24: 32-37. 10.1002/hep.510240107View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Khakoo SI, Ling R, Scott I, Dodi AI, Harrison TJ, Dusheiko GM, Madrigal JA: Cytotoxic T lymphocyte responses and CTL epitope escape mutation in HBsAg, anti-HBe positive individuals. Gut 2000, 47: 137-143. 10.1136/gut.47.1.137PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Alexopoulou A, Baltayiannis G, Eroglu C, Nastos T, Dourakis SP, Archimandritis AJ, Karayiannis P: Core mutations in patients with acute episodes of chronic HBV infection are associated with the emergence of new immune recognition sites and the development of high IgM anti-HBc index values. J Med Virol 2009, 81: 34-41. 10.1002/jmv.21337View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Pumpens P, Grens E, Nassal M: Molecular epidemiology and immunology of hepatitis B virus infection - an update. Intervirology 2002, 45: 218-232. 10.1159/000067915View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Ferrari C, Bertoletti A, Penna A, Cavalli A, Valli A, Missale G, Pilli M, Fowler P, Giuberti T, Chisari FV, et al.: Identification of immunodominant T cell epitopes of the hepatitis B virus nucleocapsid antigen. J Clin Invest 1991, 88: 214-222. 10.1172/JCI115280PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Bertoletti A, Sette A, Chisari FV, Penna A, Levrero M, De Carli M, Fiaccadori F, Ferrari C: Natural variants of cytotoxic epitopes are T-cell receptor antagonists for antiviral cytotoxic T cells. Nature 1994, 369: 407-410. 10.1038/369407a0View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Hsu YS, Chien RN, Yeh CT, Sheen IS, Chiou HY, Chu CM, Liaw YF: Long-term outcome after spontaneous HBeAg seroconversion in patients with chronic hepatitis B. Hepatology 2002, 35: 1522-1527. 10.1053/jhep.2002.33638View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Ishaka K, Baptistab A, Bianchic L, Callead F, Grootee JD, Gudatf F: Histological grading and staging of chronic hepatitis. J Hepatology 1995, 22: 696-699. 10.1016/0168-8278(95)80226-6View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Lu YW, Tan TL, Zhang J, Chen WN: Cellular apoptosis induced by replication of hepatitis B virus: possible link between viral genotype and clinical outcome. Virol J 2007, 4: 117. 10.1186/1743-422X-4-117PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Lynch M: The origins of eukariotic gene structure. Mol Biol Evol 2006, 23: 450-468. 10.1093/molbev/msj050View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Melegari M, Wolf SK, Schneider RJ: Hepatitis B virus DNA replication is coordinated by core protein serine phosphorylation and HBx expression. J Virol 2005, 79: 9810-9820. 10.1128/JVI.79.15.9810-9820.2005PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Cohen P: The origins of protein phosphorylation. Nat Cell Biol 2002, 4: E127-130. 10.1038/ncb0502-e127View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Basagoudanavar SH, Perlman DH, Hu J: Regulation of hepadnavirus reverse transcription by dynamic nucleocapsid phosphorylation. J Virol 2007, 81: 1641-1649. 10.1128/JVI.01671-06PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Usuda S, Okamoto H, Tsuda F, Tanaka T, Miyakawa Y, Mayumi M: An enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay with monoclonal antibodies for the determination of phosphorylated hepatitis B core protein (p21c) in serum. J Virol Methods 1998, 72: 95-103. 10.1016/S0166-0934(98)00019-6View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Minami M, Poussin K, Kew M, Okanoue T, Brechot C, Paterlini P: Precore/core mutations of hepatitis B virus in hepatocellular carcinomas developed on noncirrhotic livers. Gastroenterology 1996, 111: 691-700. 10.1053/gast.1996.v111.pm8780574View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Brind A, Jiang J, Samuel D, Gigou M, Feray C, Brechot C, Kremsdorf D: Evidence for selection of hepatitis B mutants after liver transplantation through peripheral blood mononuclear cell infection. J Hepatol 1997, 26: 228-235. 10.1016/S0168-8278(97)80035-9View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Kim JH, Kang S, Kim J, Ahn BY: Hepatitis B virus core protein stimulates the proteasome-mediated degradation of viral X protein. J Virol 2003, 77: 7166-7173. 10.1128/JVI.77.13.7166-7173.2003PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Mohamadkhani et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2009

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.