Skip to content


  • Short report
  • Open Access

HIV-2 neutralization by intact V3-specific Fab fragments

Virology Journal20085:96

  • Received: 03 March 2008
  • Accepted: 18 August 2008
  • Published:


The V3 region of both HIV-1 gp120 and HIV-2 gp125 surface glycoprotein has been described as a target for neutralizing antibodies. In this study a conformation-sensitive (3C4) and a linear site-specific (7C8) anti-HIV-2 V3 monoclonal antibody (mAb) were characterized. The neutralization capacity of the purified mAbs and their respective papain-generated Fab fragments was analyzed. The Fabs were further characterized by sequence analysis. Our results demonstrate that neither purified mAbs were capable of neutralizing HIV-2, while intact Fab fragments from both mAbs blocked in vitro infection of HIV-2 isolates. Moreover, the conformation sensitive 3C4 Fab neutralized both subtype A and B HIV-2 isolates and SIVsm. Sequence analysis of the hypervariable regions of 3C4 Fab and 7C8 Fab revealed that the third CDR of the heavy chain (CDRH3) of the antibodies was not as long as many of the previously characterized neutralizing antibodies. Our findings suggest that whole 7C8 and 3C4 mAbs are sterically hindered from neutralizing HIV-2, whereas the smaller size of Fab fragments enables access to the V3 region on the virion surface.


  • Papain
  • Viral Neutralization
  • Conformational Epitope
  • Neutralization Assay
  • Papain Digestion


The HIV-1 V3 region has been identified as a target site recognized by neutralizing antibodies [1]. Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) targeting conformational epitopes within the V3 region have been demonstrated to neutralize primary HIV-1 isolates [25]. Furthermore, anti-HIV-1 V3-specific mAbs have recently been shown to have broad cross-reactivity, which was dependent on the extent of masking of the V1/V2 regions and the sequence at the crown of the V3-loop [6].

Neutralizing antibodies have been reported to bind within the HIV-2 V3 region [7, 8], with the FHSQ residues at the tip of the V3-loop [9]. However, mAbs recognizing the linear (FHSQ) site on gp125 could not neutralize HIV-2 isolates [9, 10]. Conversely, a conformational epitope composed of FHSQ (amino acids 315–318 in HIV-2 ISY clone) and WCR (amino acids 329–331) has been described in the V3 region of gp125 [9, 11], where mAbs recognizing conformational epitopes in the gp125 V3 region could neutralize HIV-2 isolates [9, 12]. While the exposure of the V3 region in HIV-1 is debated, the accessibility of neutralizing sites on HIV-2 V3 region has not been as extensively characterized as for HIV-1.

Previously, two hybridoma cell-lines have been isolated from mice immunized with two overlapping peptides of HIV-2 spanning the center and C-terminus of the V3 region [9]. The hybridoma expressing the 3C4 mAb recognized both peptides, while the 7C8 mAb recognized only the center of the V3 region. Mouse ascitic fluid containing 3C4 has been reported to neutralize different isolates of HIV-2 at a dilution of 1:20, whereas the mouse ascitic fluid containing 7C8 had no neutralizing effect. Further characterization of the binding of these two mAbs to recombinant gp125 indicated that 3C4 is conformation sensitive while 7C8 binds to a linear site [13].

In this study, the HIV-2 neutralization capacity of protein A-purified 3C4 and 7C8 mAbs was analyzed. A neutralization assay employing phytohemagglutinin-stimulated PBMCs (peripheral blood mononuclear cells) was used [14]. Two-fold serial dilutions of mAb starting at 100 μg/ml were incubated for one hour at 37°C with a minimum of 15 TCID50 (50% tissue culture infectious dose) tissue culture supernatant from virus infected cells. PBMCs (105) were then added to the mix and incubated overnight at 37°C. The medium was changed with fresh IL-2 containing medium on the following day and on day 4. Seven days after infection, supernatants were collected and analyzed for HIV-2 antigen by a capture ELISA [15]. The neutralization concentration was defined as the concentration where a 80% reduction or more of optical density at 490 nm in the culture supernatant was seen as compare to the negative control (i.e. IC80). To determine the virus inoculum dose, a TCID50 titration was performed in parallel to each neutralization experiment.

Contrary to what has been reported previously for 3C4, up to 100 μg/ml of the purified mAbs did not neutralize any of the HIV-2 isolates tested (data not shown). This could be explained by the fact that ascitic fluid contains > 10 mg/ml of mAb as well as other components that could alter the neutralization effect.

The lack of neutralization capacity displayed by both the linear-specific (7C8) and conformation-sensitive (3C4) antibodies may be related to the accessibility of the epitope recognized by these antibodies. Previous reports on the potent neutralization effect of Fabs compared to mAbs [16, 17] prompted us to study the effect of the size of mAbs on HIV-2 neutralization capacity. Both 7C8 and 3C4 were digested using papain, and the different digestion products were separated using size-exclusion chromatography (Amersham Biosciences). Fab fragments were purified using Superose-12 and eluted in a single peak using 20 mM Tris buffer. Fractions from this peak were pooled and used in the neutralization assays. HIV-2SBL6669 is a CXCR4 co-receptor-using isolate belonging to subtype A. In contrast to the undigested mAbs, both 3C4 and 7C8 Fabs were capable of neutralizing the homologous HIV-2SBL6669 isolate (including the V3 sequence the mAbs were generated against) and the hetrologous CCR5 co-receptor-using laboratory-adapted isolate HIV-2K135. Table 1 indicates the concentrations of 3C4 and 7C8 Fabs required to neutralize HIV-2 as determined on at least two different occasions. HIV-2SBL6669 and HIV-2K135 could be neutralized by both 7C8 and 3C4 Fabs, where 3C4 Fab was capable of viral neutralization at as low a concentration as 0.16 μg/ml. The concentration of 3C4 Fab required for neutralization was dependent on the virus inoculum dose, whereas 0.63 μg/ml of 7C8 Fab was required in the cases where neutralization was observed. In all the neutralization assays, the 3C4 Fab appeared to be twice as potent in neutralization as was the 7C8 Fab. Furthermore, all the primary isolates tested, regardless of co-receptor usage, were neutralized by the 3C4 Fab. Since the neutralization sites recognized by 3C4 are conserved in both HIV-2 and SIV, the neutralization of SIVsm was also assessed. SIVsm was as efficiently neutralized by the 3C4 Fab as the other HIV-2 isolates tested.
Table 1

In vitro virus neutralization exhibited by 7C8 Fab and 3C4 Fab fragments given as the concentration of Fab needed for IC80 neutralization.




Fab Fragment






















< 0.16









































+ Co-receptor usage according to Mörner et al. [11] and Vödrös et al. [30].

* Determined by Jose M. Marcelino (personal communication).

n/a Not applicable.

^ Very high virus inoculum dose.

- No neutralization observed up to 100 μg/ml.

The level of neutralization varied depending on the quality of the Fab produced by the papain digestion, where the digestion efficiency varied between experiments. To further analyze the variation in neutralization efficiency of the generated Fab fragments, Superdex 75 size-exclusion chromatography column was used. Figure 1A depicts the separation of digestion products, where Fabs (peak II) are separated from over-digested Fab fragments (peak III). Fab fragments of molecular weight ~47 kDa were capable of neutralizing HIV-2, whereas over-digested Fab fragments with a lower molecular weight of ~37 kDa were not (data not shown). The preferential papain digestion sites on antibodies is illustrated in the schematic diagram in Figure 1A. As previously described, over-digestion by papain can release Fv from Fab fragments [18, 19], producing a digested Fab fragment incapable of viral neutralization.
Figure 1
Figure 1

Fab production, purification and sequencing. A. Chromatogram of separation of papain digestion products using Superdex-75. The undigested mAb (I) is eluted first, followed by the Fab fragments (II & III) and the Fc fragments along with other small digestion products (IV) are collected last. Bottom right: Analysis of fractions 1–5 on 10% SDS gel demonstrate separation of the Fab fragments (47 kDa) from the over-digested Fab fragments (≈ 37 kDa). Top right: Schematic diagram of mAb digestion by papain as previously described in literature [18]. The bold arrow indicates were papain digests primarily before the cysteine-bridges on mAb (I). The papain can also digest the Fab fragment produced (II), as indicated by dashed arrow. The digested Fab (III) may be missing one of the Fv regions. B. The variable regions of 7C8 and 3C4 heavy and light chains, are aligned respectively. The CDR regions as indicated by immunoglobulin superfamily database[31] are shaded.

The mechanism underlying the more potent neutralizing effect of Fab fragments has been previously correlated with the smaller size of Fab fragments compared to the size of whole IgG, where steric factors could limit the accessibility to neutralizing epitopes [16]. Previous reports have also described different neutralization mechanisms between mAbs and Fabs at the attachment or fusion of the virus with target cells [20, 21].

To characterize the Fab fragments, the variable regions of 7C8 and 3C4 were sequenced according to their subtypes. Sub-typing of 7C8 and 3C4 revealed that both mAbs have kappa light chains and that they belong to subtypes IgG1 and IgG2a, respectively. Alignment of 7C8 and 3C4 variable regions (Figure 1B) indicated that the light chains of both Fabs are more conserved (93% identity) than the heavy chain (53% identity). The predicted CDR loops are indicated in Figure 1B, where the CDR3 loop of 7C8 and 3C4 heavy chains consists of 13 and 11 residues, respectively.

The third CDR of the heavy chain (CDRH3) of an antibody plays a distinctive role in determining antibody specificity [22]. Sequence analysis of 7C8 CDRH3 revealed a comparatively long region of 13 amino acids (aa), whereas the average length of CDRH3 in mice is between 8 and 9 aa and <11% of mice antibodies have a CDRH3 length of >13 aa [22, 23]. Most human anti-gp120 antibodies have CDRH3 of >15 aa [24], as exemplified by the neutralizing mAbs/Fab, 17b, b12, 2F5, and X5 which recognize different epitopes on gp120 and have CDRH3 lengths of 19, 18, 22, and 22 aa respectively [2529]. Therefore, we do not believe that the comparatively longer CDRH3 regions of 3C4 and 7C8 would play a strong role in the viral neutralization.

In conclusion, a confirmation sensitive HIV-2 V3 specific Fab was shown to neutralize both HIV-2 A and B subtypes and SIVsm. Further analyses indicate that the smaller size of intact Fab fragments may be a determining factor for HIV-2 V3-specfic viral neutralization. These results could provide clues to small molecule anti-HIV inhibitors.



The study was supported by the Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.

Authors’ Affiliations

Department of Microbiology, Tumor and Cellbiology, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
Department of Immunology and Vaccinology, Swedish Institute for Infectious Disease Control, Solna, Sweden
AstraZeneca Safety Assessment, Södertälje, Sweden


  1. Huber M, Trkola A: Humoral immunity to HIV-1: neutralization and beyond. J Internal Med 2007, 262: 5-25. 10.1111/j.1365-2796.2007.01819.xView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Binley JM, Wrin T, Korber B, Zwick MB, Wang M, Chappey C, Steigler G, Kunert R, Zolla-Pazner S, Katinger H, Petropoulos CJ, Burton DR: Comprehensive cross-clade neutralization analysis of a panel of anti-human immunodeficiency virus type 1 monoclonal antibodies. J Virol 2004, 78: 13232-13252. 10.1128/JVI.78.23.13232-13252.2004PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Conley AJ, Gorny MK, Kessler JA II, Boots LJ, Ossorio-Castro M, Koenig S, Lineberger DW, Emini EA, Williams C, Zolla-Pazner S: Neutralization of primary human immunodeficiency virus type 1 isolates by the broadly reactive anti-V3 monoclonal antibody, 447-52D. J Virol 1994, 68: 6994-7000.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Zolla-Pazner S, Zhong P, Revesz K, Volsky B, Williams C, Nyambi P, Gorny MK: The cross-clade neutralizing activity of a human monoclonal antibody is determined by the GPGR V3 motif of HIV type 1. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses 2004, 20: 1254-1258. 10.1089/aid.2004.20.1254View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Gorny MK, Revesz K, Williams C, Volsky B, Lauder MK, Anyanywe CA, Krachmarov C, Kayman SC, Pinter A, Nadas A, Nyambi PN, Mascola JR, Zolla-Pazner S: The V3 loop is accessible on the surface of most human immunodeficiency virus type 1 primary isolates and serves as a neutralization epitope. J Virol 2004, 78: 2394-2404. 10.1128/JVI.78.5.2394-2404.2004PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Krachmarov CP, Honnen WJ, Kayman SC, Gorney MK, Zolla-Pazner S, Pinter A: Factors determining the breadth and potency of neutralization by V3-specific human monoclonal antibodies derived from subjects infected with clade A and clade B strains of human immunodeficiency virus type 1. J Virol 2006, 80: 7127-7135. 10.1128/JVI.02619-05PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Björling E, Broliden K, Bernardi D, Utter G, Thorstensson R, Chiodi F, Norrby E: Hyperimmune antisera against synthetic peptides representing the glycoprotein of human ummundeficiency virus type 2 can mediate neutralization and antibody-mediated cytotoxic activity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1991, 88: 6082-6086. 10.1073/pnas.88.14.6082PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Matsushita S, Matsumi S, Yoshimura K, Morikita T, Murakami T, Takatsuki K: Neutralizing monoclonal antibodies against human immunodeficiency virus type 2 gp120. J Virol 1995, 69: 3333-3340.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Björling E, Chiodi F, Utter G, Norrby E: Two neutralizing domains in the V3 region in the envelope glycoprotein gp125 of HIV type 2. J Immunol 1994, 152: 1952-1959.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. McKnight A, Shotton C, Cordell J, Jones I, Simmons G, Clapham PR: Location, exposure, and conservation of neutralizing and nonneutralizing epitopes on human immunodeficiency virus type 2 SU glycoprotein. J Virol 1996, 70: 4598-4606.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Mörner A, Björndal A, Albert J, Kewalramani VN, Littman DR, Inoue R, Thorstensson R, Fenyö EM, Björling E: Primary human immunodeficiency virus type 2 (HIV-2) isolates, like HIV-1 isolates, frequently use CCR5 but show promiscuity in coreceptor usage. J Virol 1999, 73: 2343-2349.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. McKnight A, Dittmar MT, Moniz-Periera J, Ariyoshi K, Reeves JD, Hibbitts S, Whitby D, Aarons E, Proudfoot AE, Whittle H, Clapham PR: A broad range of chemokine receptors are used by primary isolates of human immunodeficiency virus type 2 as coreceptors with CD4. J Virol 1998, 72: 4065-4071.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Sourial S, Nilsson C, Wärnmark A, Achour A, Harris RA: Deletion of the V1/V2 region does not increase the accessibility of the V3 region of recombinant gp125. Curr HIV Res 2006, 4: 229-237. 10.2174/157016206776055066View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Lizeng Q, Skott P, Sourial S, Nilsson C, Andersson S, Ehnlund M, Taveira N, Björling E: Serum immunolglobulin A (IgA)-mediated immunity in human immunodeficiency virus type 2 (HIV-2) infection. Virology 2003, 308: 225-232. 10.1016/S0042-6822(02)00088-0View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Thorstensson R, Walther L, Putkonen P, Albert J, Biberfeld G: A capture enzyme immunoassay for detection of HIV-2/SIV antigen. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 1991,4(4):374-379.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Labrijn AF, Poignard P, Raja A, Zwick MB, Delgado K, Franti M, Binley J, Vivona V, Grundner C, Huang CC, Venturi M, Petropoulos CJ, Wrin T, Dimitrov DS, Robinson J, Kwong PD, Wyatt RT, Sodroski J, Burton DR: Access of antibody molecules to the conserved coreceptor binding site on glycoprotein gp120 is sterically restricted on primary human immunodeficiency virus type 1. J Virol 2003, 77: 10557-10565. 10.1128/JVI.77.19.10557-10565.2003PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Roben P, Moore JP, Thali M, Sodroski J, Barbas CF 3rd, Burton DR: Recognition properties of a panel of human recombinant Fab fragments to the CD4 binding site of gp120 that show differing abilities to neutralize human immunodeficiency virus type 1. J Virol 1994, 68: 4821-4828.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Parham P: Preparation and purification of active fragments from mouse monoclonal antibodies. In Cellular Immunology. Volume 1. 4th edition. Edited by: Weir DM. California: Blackwell Scientific Publications; 1986.Google Scholar
  19. Ornatowska M, Glasel JA: Direct production of Fv-fragments from a family of monoclonal IgGs papain digestion. Mol Immunol 1991, 28: 383-391. 10.1016/0161-5890(91)90151-9View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. McInerney TL, McLain L, Armstrong SJ, Dimmock NJ: A human IgG1 (b12) specific for the CD4 binding site of HIV-1 neutralizes by inhibiting the virus fusion entry process, but b12 Fab neutralizes by inhibiting a postfusion event. Virology 1997, 233: 313-26. 10.1006/viro.1997.8547View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Edwards MJ, Dimmock NJ: Two influenza A virus-specific Fabs neutralize by inhibiting virus attachment to target cells, while neutralization by their IgGs is complex and occurs simultaneously through fusion inhibition and attachment inhibition. Virology 2000, 278: 423-435. 10.1006/viro.2000.0631View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Popkov M, Mage RG, Alexander CB, Thundivalappil S, Barbas CF: Rabbit immune repertoires as sources for therapeutic monoclonal antibodies: the impact of kappa allotype-correlated variation in cysteine content on antibody libraries selected by phage display. J Mol Biol 2003, 325: 325-335. 10.1016/S0022-2836(02)01232-9View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Wu TT, Johnson G, Kabat EA: Length distribution of CDRH3 in antibodies. Proteins 1993, 16: 1-7. 10.1002/prot.340160102View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Johnson G, Wu TT: Preferred CDRH3 lengths for antibodies with defined specificities. Int Immunology 1998, 10: 1801-1805. 10.1093/intimm/10.12.1801View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Kwong PD, Wyatt R, Robinson J, Sweet RW, Sodroski J, Hendrickson WA: Structure of an HIV gp120 envelope glycoprotein in complex with the CD4 receptor and a neutralizing human antibody. Nature 1998, 393: 648-659. 10.1038/31405View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Kwong PD, Wyatt R, Majeed S, Robinson J, Sweet RW, Sodroski J, Hendrickson WA: Structures of HIV-1 gp120 envelope glycoprotein from lab-adapted and primary isolates. Structure 2000, 8: 1329-1339. 10.1016/S0969-2126(00)00547-5View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Saphire EO, Parren PW, Pantophlet R, Zwick MB, Morris GM, Rudd PM, Dwek RA, Stanfield RL, Burton DR, Wilson IA: Crystal structure of a neutralizing human IGG against HIV-1: a template for vaccine design. Science 2001, 293: 1155-1159. 10.1126/science.1061692View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Zwick MB, Komori HK, Stanfield RL, Church S, Wang M, Parren PW, Kunert R, Katinger H, Wilson IA, Burton DR: The long third complementarity-determining region of the heavy chain is important in the activity of the broadly neutralizing anti-human immunodeficiency virus type 1 antibody 2F5. J Virol 2004, 78: 3155-3161. 10.1128/JVI.78.6.3155-3161.2004PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Dharba R, Phogat S, Labrijn AF, Shu Y, Gu Y, Andrykovitch M, Zhang MY, Pantophlet R, Martin L, Vita C, Burton DR, Dimitrov DS, Ji X: Crystal structure of the broadly cross-reactive HIV-1-neutralizing Fab X5 and fine mapping of its epitope. Biochemistry 2004, 43: 1410-1417. 10.1021/bi035323xView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Vödrös D, Thorstensson R, Biberfeld G, Schols D, De Clercq E, Fenyo EM: Coreceptor usage of sequential isolates from cynomolgus monkeys experimentally infected with simian immunodeficiency virus (SIVsm). Virology 2001, 291: 12-21. 10.1006/viro.2001.1164View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. The international ImMunoGeneTics information system database[]


© Sourial and Nilsson; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2008

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.