Borna disease virus (BDV) infection in psychiatric patients and healthy controls in Iran
© Mazaheri-Tehrani et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014
Received: 24 April 2014
Accepted: 20 August 2014
Published: 3 September 2014
Borna disease virus (BDV) is an evolutionary old RNA virus, which infects brain and blood cells of humans, their primate ancestors, and other mammals. Human infection has been correlated to mood disorders and schizophrenia, but the impact of BDV on mental-health still remains controversial due to poor methodological and cross-national comparability.
This first report from the Middle East aimed to determine BDV infection prevalence in Iranian acute psychiatric disorder patients and healthy controls through circulating immune complexes (CIC), antibodies (Ab) and antigen (pAg) in blood plasma using a standardized triple enzyme immune assay (EIA). Samples of 314 subjects (114 psychiatric cases, 69 blood donors, and 131 healthy controls) were assayed and data analyzed quantitatively and qualitatively.
CICs revealed a BDV prevalence of one third (29.5%) in healthy Iranian controls (27.5% controls; 33.3% blood donors). In psychiatric patients CIC prevalence was higher than in controls (40.4%) and significantly correlating with bipolar patients exhibiting overt clinical symptoms (p = 0.005, OR = 1.65). CIC values were significantly elevated in bipolar (p = 0.001) and major depressive disorder (p = 0.029) patients as compared to controls, and in females compared to males (p = 0.031).
This study supports a similarly high prevalence of subclinical human BDV infections in Iran as reported for central Europe, and provides again an indication for the correlation of BDV infection and mood disorders. Further studies should address the morbidity risk for healthy carriers and those with elevated CIC levels, along with gender disparities.
Borna disease virus (BDV) holds unique features in terms of its cell biology, molecular properties, preference to old brain areas, broad host spectrum , and unusual biological age, dating back to more than 40 million years [2, 3]. The outstanding molecular biology of the virus, and its single
stranded RNA genome leading to the classification  of an own family, Bornaviridae (order Mononegavirales), has been comprehensively reviewed . BDV had first been recognized as an often deadly pathogen of horses and sheep [1, 6] with a wide spectrum in other domestic and farm animals. However, BDV’s non-cytolytic properties, low replication while over-expressing two major proteins, and evidence of modulating neurotransmitter networks , pointed to a long-term adaption toward moderate pathogenicity and persistency .
Human infection and its putative link to mental disorders, first suggested after detection of antibodies , became a key issue inspiring research groups around the globe. After nucleic acid and antigen could be demonstrated in white blood cells of psychiatrically diseased patients , such a link was further strengthened by the finding of specific RNA sequences in post mortem brains of psychiatric patients  and limbic structures from old people .
The impact of human infection was significantly supported by the isolation and sequence characterization of human viruses from psychiatric patients’ blood cells and brain [12–14], and the recent correlation of neurological symptoms in humans with BDV infection . The latest discovery of functional endogenous virus gene pieces integrated in the human and primate ancestor germ lines strongly argued in favor of a long-term co-evolution of virus and hosts [2, 3, 16]. However, a role of BDV, whatsoever, in human mental-health remained controversial, despite of predominantly supportive reports [17–24]. This is mainly due to a great variation in prevalence results largely caused by methodological disparities, due to different antibody and/or RNA techniques, affecting as well cross-national comparability. In contrast, BDV-specific circulating immune complexes, the most prevalent infection markers , have shown to be superior to antibody- or RNA- detection. Pilot prevalence studies could demonstrate that the BDV-CIC enzyme immune assay (EIA) is an easy to perform and robust test format, suitable to conducting comparable surveys in the general population of different countries, as well as longitudinal follow-up studies of patients in clinical cohorts [26–31]. Circulating immune complexes are the result of periods of antigenemia over-expressing N- and P-proteins, and antibody induction in the host, reflecting recent and current virus activity. Evidence for a contribution of BDV infection to disease symptoms has recently been reviewed .
This is the first report from the Middle East, addressing the prevalence of BDV in the human population in Iran. The virus in horses has previously been reported by antibody studies . Here we explore the prevalence of BDV markers among Iranian mentally diseased patients, healthy controls, and blood donors.
Three hundred and fourteen Iranian subjects, including 114 psychiatric patients, 131 sex and age matched healthy controls, and 69 blood donors were included in this study. The association between BDV infection markers in blood plasma and five DSM IV- categorized psychiatric diseases, as well as gender and age of the individuals were analyzed.
Basic data on the population
Mean age + SE
41.08 + 1.009
29.93 + 1.296
37.42 + 1.103
36.20 + 1.477
43.42 + 3.450
34.56 + 2.689
38.33 + 2.863
46.20 + 3.967
37.30 + 0.688
DSM IV codes, numbers and symptoms of psychiatric patients
Single manic episode, moderate
Single manic episode, severe without psychotic features
Single manic episode, severe with psychotic features
Most recent episode manic, moderate
Most recent episode manic, severe without psychotic features
Most recent episode manic, severe with psychotic features
Most recent episode depressed, moderate
Most recent episode depressed, severe without psychotic features
Most recent episode depressed, severe with psychotic features
Most recent episode mixed, moderate
Most recent episode mixed, severe without psychotic features
Most recent episode mixed, severe with psychotic features
Recurrent, severe without psychotic features
Recurrent, severe with psychotic features
Single episode, moderate
Single episode, severe without psychotic features
Single episode, severe with psychotic features
Obsessive compulsive disorder
Enzyme immune assays (EIAs)
The BDV infection markers, circulating immune complexes (CICs), virus antigens (N- and P- protein, N/P-complexes; abbreviated Ag), and antibodies (Ab), were assayed using the triple enzyme immune assay (EIA) system, as described . According to the double- sandwich format, two BDV-specific monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), anti-N mAb (W1) and anti-P mAb (Kfu2), were used to bind any BDV-N- and P-protein or N/P -heterodimers in plasma, either circulating antigen bound to virus- specific host antibodies (CIC- EIA) or free antigen (pAg-EIA). CICs were visualized through alkaline phosphatase (AP)-coupled anti-human IgG and substrate, whereas the Ag-EIA needs a BDV-specific detecting antibody (rabbit hyper-immune serum) followed by AP phosphatase coupled anti-rabbit IgG and substrate. The specificity and sensitivity of the BDV mAbs have been further characterized . In particular, epitope mapping has revealed that both these mAbs are binding to powerful conformational epitopes on either protein, which are formed through 5 binding sites in case of the anti-N mAb (W1) and 3 binding sites in case of the anti-P mAb (Kfu2). None of the W1 binding sites are overlapping with P-protein binding domains on the N-protein, confirming that commonly occurring N/P heterodimers are recognized by W1, as well. In addition, none of either W1- and Kfu2- binding sites are overlapping with functionally important sites on N and P-protein, like NLS (nuclear localization signal) and NES (nuclear export signal). The extraordinarily high binding capacities of these mAbs to native N and P proteins have been determined through affinity-chromatography methods using N and P protein from the brain of a horse with Borna disease, resulting in dissociation constants (KD) of 2.31 × 10-9 for W1 and 3.33 × 10-9 for Kfu2. Like for other antigen assays, recombinant proteins have been used to determine sensitivity and further confirm specificity. The detection limit of 1.5-3 ng/ml of purified recombinant N-protein (rN) has been determined for W1 mAb. Diluting of rN in CIC-, Ag- and Ab- EIA-negative serum did not make any difference, confirming specificity. Additionally, N-protein could be demonstrated in the immune precipitate (IP using W1) of a strongly antigen positive patient’s plasma by western blot, whereas the IP of an antigen-negative plasma showed nothing but the heavy and light chain of the mAb . Furthermore, using recombinant P-protein, either the non-phosphorylated or phosphorylated form, revealed that mAb Kfu2 only detects the activated phosphorylated form. Regarding the antibody assay we followed the exact protocol given earlier . All three assays use the basic coating of antibody-stabilized monoclonal antibodies (W1 and Kfu2) as a standard immune module .
According to the primary experimental setting, a standardized cut off value has been specified as a mean of negative values plus 2 standard deviations, regularly reaching an extinction of < = 0.1 which separates negative and positive scores. The initial dilutions of the samples were 1:20, 1:2, and 1:100 to allow the same cut off value for testing CICs, free Ag, and Ab, respectively . Results were visualized through alkaline phosphatase conjugated antibodies and a colorimetric substrate, absorbance measured in a multichannel photometer (405 nm), and values imported to statistical software .
Repetition of one third of the sample collection was performed and essentially gave the same results.
All data of the patients and controls were submitted to parametric and non-parametric statistical analyses. A comparison of the groups was carried out using independent T-Tests, ANOVA and Chi square tests. The prevalence of BDV infection markers was calculated as based on the cut off value of 0.1. Subjects were classified according to clinical diagnostic, gender and age as independent variables, as based on the CIC data measured.
The detailed evaluation of CIC tests were based on standardized scoring of the OD-values of >0.100- 0.300 to be +, >0.300- 0.600 to be ++, > 0.600 - 1.000 to be +++, and > 1.000 to be ++++ . Prevalence and odds ratios (OR) were calculated. Chi square tests were used for an estimation of statistical differences between the groups. Furthermore, binary logistic regression for an estimation of an individual influence of three basic variables, namely age, gender and clinical diagnosis, on CIC titers was applied.
As shown in Table 1, efforts have been made to include gender and age matched control subjects, but comparability could finally not be achieved. The large disparity in both the female-to-male ratios and age of blood donors compared to patients considerably accounted for this limitation (gender: chi square = 7.758, p = 005; age: by t test, p = 0.015). As shown in Table 2, the majority of bipolar patients (BD) were either manic (59.4%) or in a mixed episode (25%), whereas only 15.6% experienced a recent depression. Of all patients, only 19.3% (10 BMD, 12 MDD patients out of 114) presented with a recent depressive episode.
Circulating immune complexes
Based on CICs we found a mean prevalence of subclinical infection of 29.5% in the healthy Iranian controls, displaying a slightly higher prevalence in blood donors (33.3%) as compared to the healthy subject cohort (27.5%) for whom any mental illness has been excluded.
CIC results against three predictors: sex, age and diagnosis
Pos./Neg. (p %)
Free antibody and antigen
Prevalence of free antibodies and antigen
Free antigen (N-& P-protein)
Additional data analysis
Distribution of categorized CIC results (neg., +, ++, +++) in subgroups
Neg N (%)
This is the first study in Iranian people showing a fairly high prevalence of Bornavirus infection in healthy individuals including blood donors. The results meet reported data from Central Europe of about 30% based on the same infection marker (CIC). The study also supports previous findings that this neurotropic virus infection is more prevalent in psychiatric patients than in healthy donors. According to trends our results are supporting infection patterns in other countries, like Europe, the Americas and Asia which are based on specific antibody- and nucleic acid detection [9, 10, 15, 21, 35–42], despite of largely differing prevalence data. Based on measuring BDV released antigens or antigen-antibody complexes, like CICs [25, 27, 29, 30], our data showed a much better agreement.
Studies questioning and reporting the absence of BDV in both normal and psychiatrically diseased people remain inconclusive as long as no other cohorts have been investigated and no other methods have been applied. Among those are studies of Na et al.  and Hornig et al. .The latter group even neglected an own earlier positive study with contradictory results from the same country . On the other hand, the existence of a human BDV strain has recently been independently proven by an in vitro study in brain cells. Only the human virus was able to reduce proliferation and enhance apoptosis but not the animal-derived laboratory strain of BDV .
Our study used an established triple EIA which had been successfully applied to monitor point- and longitudinal prevalence of BDV infection markers in patients [25, 26]. In our hands, these EIAs were found to be easy to handle and to provide robust and reproducible measurements. It is unfortunate that general acceptance is still pending. In this study, consecutive sampling of admitted patients was not possible. Although the data only refer to cross-sectional sample analysis, BDV markers were significantly more prevalent in Iranian patients with mental diseases than in control subjects. These findings were similar to data reported from Germany [25, 26], Italy  Australia , the CSSR , China (Xia Liu, Peng Xie, pers. communication), and Lithuania (Violeta Mockeliūnienė, Robertas Bunevicius, pers. communication) where the same test system had been applied.
The presence of CIC with or without antibodies indicates a chronic infection; the presence of Ag, with or without CICs at the same time, a currently active infection. The finding of free anti-BDV antibody alone (no antigen, no CICs) is thought to indicate previous exposure to the agent, but not a current active infection . As shown in earlier reports CICs represent the major viral marker explaining the transient disappearance of antibodies and antigens in blood plasma between activated and dormant phases of virus infection, and by this providing also a clue for the true number of silently infected carriers in a healthy cohort or population [25, 26, 34].
Iranian psychiatric patients show a clearly elevated CIC sero-prevalence (40.4%) compared to healthy controls (27.5%). It is of special interest that 33.3% of samples from blood donations were silent virus carriers, a finding confirming Australian  and German pilot reports [17, 26], thus being quite in contrast to an earlier report . Transfusion issues relating to BDV infection are still awaiting further clarification .
BD, MDD and OCD patients presented with infection rates of 45.3%, 50.0% and 40.0%, respectively. However, significance levels were only reached in BD patients. This might be due to the small sample size, but in parametric data analysis, comparing OD values of absorbance (extinction), high levels of CICs in sera from BD and MDD patients were also significant.
In contrast to other reports [47, 48], we found a relatively high sero-prevalence of free Ab and Ag in schizophrenic patients (16.7% and 5.6%, respectively) which is consistent with a relatively low CIC sero-prevalence among those individuals (22.2%, see Table 2). In addition to schizophrenic patients, only BD patients showed free antibodies in their sera (7.8%). This implies that BDV antibodies are usually bound in immune complexes and are therefore becoming transiently absent in the blood stream.
It is of considerable interest that the CIC sero-prevalence adversely correlated with the corresponding age groups (linear regression done using age as continuous data, R = -0.116, p = 0.042), which means that the young patients had highest CIC values, although the age limit includes only adults 18 years and older. This leaves the question whether younger people are either more prone to BDV infection or their immune response is more prominent. It supports a recent finding that young children (from 4–6 months to 3 years of age) had even much higher infection rates, although this pilot study warrants further investigations [28, 34], In addition, it has to be further examined whether and to which extent vertical transmission of BDV in the pregnant horse , mouse  and human  contributes to higher infection rates at young age. In this regard, high prevalence of BDV in the normal population, lifelong persistence of the virus in infected subjects (patients or healthy people), and the so far undisclosed function of endogenized BDV genome stretches [2, 3, 16], might reflect further risk factors warranting urgent future investigations.
Interestingly, significant differences between female and male patients could be measured for the first time (Figure 2. middle, p = 0.031), showing a prevalence of CICs in 42.3% of females, and 38.7% in males. In favor of these findings, two female patients, belonging to the BD and MDD groups, had high CIC titers with levels above 0.6 (+++) (Table 5). The sero-prevalence among healthy controls, however, reached only 25.3% in females and 31.3% in males.
Such sex-related specific differences according to, titers and prevalence of an antibody response to foreign antigens, infectious agents, or even auto antigens are known from the literature [51–55]. Females usually exhibit a stronger humoral immune response, as especially known after vaccination and infection with microbial agents. In fact, estrogens exert stimulatory effects on B cell proliferation and serum IgG levels, whereas testosterone may suppress B cell function [56, 57].
In conclusion, Iranian people seem to fit into the pattern of BDV infections, so far reported worldwide . Moreover, the study benefits from using prevalent infection markers and a highly specific and effective test system [26, 34]. The study confirms evidence for a high infection prevalence, similar to Central Europe, in one third of healthy Iranian subjects, contrasting elevated levels in patients with mood disorders. In view of millions of people worldwide suffering from depression and the huge related health care costs , this study points again to integrating BDV infection surveillance in psychiatric research  rather than to continue in underplaying its impact.
This work was supported by the Iranian Neuroscience Research Network, Ministry of Health [grant number A 162]. We are grateful to Biodaroo Co. for collecting the plasma donors for this study. Long term grants of the DFG, the EU, and the FU Berlin to HL from the early1990s to 2005 contributed to the basic Bornavirus research.
- Ludwig H, Bode L, Gosztonyi G: Borna Disease: a persistent virus infection of the central nervous system. Prog Med Virol. 1988, 35: 107-151.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Horie M, Honda T, Suzuki Y, Kobayashi Y, Daito T, Oshida T, Ikuta K, Jern P, Gojobori T, Coffin JM, Tomonaga K: Endogenous non-retroviral RNA virus elements in mammalian genomes. Nature. 2010, 463: 84-87. 10.1038/nature08695.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Belyi VA, Levine AJ, Skalka AM: Unexpected Inheritance: Multiple integrations of ancient bornavirus and ebolavirus/marburgvirus sequences in vertebrate genomes. PLoS Pathog. 2010, 6: e1001030-10.1371/journal.ppat.1001030.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- de la Torre JC, Bode L, Carbone KM, Dietzschold B, Ikuta K, Lipkin WI, Ludwig H, Richt JA, Staeheli P, Stitz L: Family Bornaviridae. Virus taxonomy 283, classification and nomenclature of viruses. 284 Seventh report of the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses, Volume 10. 2000, [Online] 285 San Diego: Academic Press, Calif, 531-538.Google Scholar
- Lipkin WI, Briese T: Bornaviridae. Fields Virology, Volume II. Edited by: Knipe D, Howley P, Griffin D, Lamb R, Martin M, Roizman B, Straus S. 2007, Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, 1829-1851. 5Google Scholar
- Vahlenkamp TW, Konrath A, Weber M, Mueller H: Persistence of Borna disease virus in naturally infected sheep. J Virol. 2002, 76: 9735-9797. 10.1128/JVI.76.19.9735-9743.2002.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gosztonyi G, Ludwig H: Neurotransmitter receptors and viral neurotropism. Neuropsychiat Clin. 1984, 3: 107-114.Google Scholar
- Rott R, Herzog S, Fleischer B, Winokur A, Amsterdam J, Dyson W, Koprowski H: Detection of serum antibodies to Borna disease virus in patients with psychiatric disorders. Science. 1985, 228: 755-756. 10.1126/science.3922055.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bode L, Zimmermann W, Ferszt R, Steinbach F, Ludwig H: Borna disease virus genome transcribed and expressed in psychiatric patients. Nat Med. 1995, 1: 232-236. 10.1038/nm0395-232.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Salvatore M, Morzunov S, Schwemmle M, Lipkin WI: Borna disease virus in brains of North American and European people with schizophrenia and bipolar disorder. Lancet. 1997, 349: 1813-1814. 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)61693-5.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- de la Torre JC, Gonzalez-Dunia D, Cubitt B, Mallory M, Mueller-Lantzsch N, Grässer FA: Detection of Borna disease virus antigen and RNA in human autopsy brain samples from neuropsychiatric patients. Virology. 1996, 223: 272-282. 10.1006/viro.1996.0479.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bode L, Duerrwald R, Rantam FA, Ferszt R, Ludwig H: First isolates of infectious human Borna disease virus from patients with mood disorders. Mol Psychiatry. 1996, 1: 200-212.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- de la Torre JC, Bode L, Duerrwald R, Cubitt B, Ludwig H: Sequence characterization of human Borna disease virus. Virus Res. 1996, 44: 33-34. 10.1016/0168-1702(96)01338-X.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Nakamura Y, Takahashi H, Shoya Y, Nakaya T, Watanabe M, Tomonaga K, Ameno K, Momiyama N, Taniyama H, Sata T, Kurata T, de la Torre JC, Ikuta K, Iwahashi K: Isolation of Borna disease virus from human brain tissue. J Virol. 2000, 74: 4601-4611. 10.1128/JVI.74.10.4601-4611.2000.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Li Q, Wang Z, Zhu D, Xu M, Chen X, Peng D, Iwata Y, Xie P: Detection and analysis of Borna disease virus in Chinese patients with neurological disorders. Eur J Neurol. 2009, 16: 399-403. 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2008.02516.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Feschotte C: Bornavirus enters the genome. Nature News Views. 2010, 463: 39-40. 10.1038/463039a.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bode: Human infections with Borna disease virus and potential pathogenic implications. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol. 1995, 190: 103-130.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sierra-Honigmann AM, Carbone KM, Yolken RH: Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) search for viral nucleic acid sequences in schizophrenia. Br J Psychiatry. 1995, 166: 55-60. 10.1192/bjp.166.1.55.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Taller AM, Asher DM, Pomeroy KL, Eldadah BA, Godec MS, Falkai PG, Bogert B, Kleinman JE, Stevens JR, Torrey EF: Search for viral nucleic acid sequences in brain tissues of patients with schizophrenia using nested polymerase chain reaction. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1996, 53: 32-40. 10.1001/archpsyc.1996.01830010034006.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Chen CH, Chiu YL, Shaw CK, Tsa MT, Hwang AL, Hsiao KJ: Detection of Borna disease virus RNA from pheripheral blood mononuclear cells in schizophrenia patients and mental health workers. Mol Psychiatry. 1999, 4: 566-571. 10.1038/sj.mp.4000568.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Rybakowski F, Yamaguchi K, Krzyminski S, Zmyslony F, Biernat J, Kocialkowski M, Tandeck A, Trafarska B, Zalejski M, Sawada T, Naraki T, Czerski P, Rajewski A, Rybakowski JK: Detection of anti-Borna disease virus antibodies in patients hospitalized in psychiatric hospitals located in the mid-Western region of Poland. Psychiatr Pol. 2001, 35: 819-829.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ikuta K, Ibrahim MS, Kobayashi T, Tomonaga K: Borna disease virus and infection in humans. Front Biosci. 2002, 7d: 470-495.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Miranda HC, Nunes SO, Calvo ES, Suzart S, Itano EN, Watanabe MA: Detection of Borna disease virus p24 RNA in peripheral blood cells from Brazilian mood and psychotic disorder patients. J Affect Disord. 2006, 90: 43-47. 10.1016/j.jad.2005.10.008.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Nunes SO, Itano EN, Amarante MK, Reiche EM, Miranda HC, de Oliveira CE, Matsuo T, Vargas HO, Vatanabe MO: RNA from Borna disease virus in patients with schizophrenia, schizoaffective patients, and in their biological relatives. J Clin Lab Anal. 2008, 22: 314-320. 10.1002/jcla.20261.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bode L, Reckwald P, Severus WE, Stoyloff R, Ferszt R, Dietrich DE, Ludwig H: Borna disease virus-specific circulating immune complexes, antigenemia, and free antibodies–the key marker triplet determining infection and prevailing in severe mood disorders. Mol Psychiatry. 2001, 6: 481-491. 10.1038/sj.mp.4000909.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bode L, Ludwig H: Borna disease virus infection, a human mental-health risk. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2003, 16: 534-545. 10.1128/CMR.16.3.534-545.2003.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Patti AM, Vulcano A, Candelori E, Ludwig H, Bode L: Borna disease virus infection in the population of Latium (Italy). APMIS Suppl. 2008, 124: 74-76.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Scholbach T, Bode L: Borna disease virus infection in young children. APMIS Suppl. 2008, 124: 83-88.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Flower RL, Kamhieh S, McLean L, Bode L, Ludwig H, Ward CM: Human Borna disease virus infection in Australia: serological markers of infection in multi-transfused patients. APMIS Suppl. 2008, 124: 89-93.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Rackova S, Janu L, Kabickova H: Borna disease virus circulating immunocomplex positivity and psychopathology in psychiatric patients in the Czech Republic. Neuro Endocrinol Lett. 2009, 30: 414-420.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Thakur R, Sarma S, Sharma B: Role of Borna disease virus in neuropsychiatric illnesses: are we inching closer?. Indian J Med Microbiol. 2009, 27: 191-201. 10.4103/0255-0857.53200.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ludwig H, Bode L: From latent herpes viruses to persistent Bornavirus. From the hallowed halls of herpesvirology. Edited by: A tribute to Bernard Roizman, Blaho JA, Baines JD. 2012, Singapore: World Scientific Publ, 169-186.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bahmani MK, Nowrouzian I, Nakaya T, Nakamura Y, Hagiwara K, Takahashi H, Rad MA, Ikuta K: Varied prevalence of Borna disease virus infection in Arabic, thoroughbred and their cross-bred horses in Iran. Virus Res. 1996, 45: 1-13. 10.1016/0168-1702(96)01355-X.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bode L: Human Bornavirus infection- towards a valid diagnostic system. APMIS Suppl. 2008, 124: 21-39.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bode L, Ferszt R, Czech G: Borna disease virus infection and affective disorders in man. Arch Virol Suppl. 1993, 7: 159-167. 10.1007/978-3-7091-9300-6_13.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Iwahashi K, Watanabe M, Nakamura K, Suwaki H, Nakaya T, Nakamura Y, Takahashi H, Ikuta K: Clinical investigation of the relationship between Borna disease virus (BDV) infection and schizophrenia in 67 patients in Japan. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1997, 96: 412-415. 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1997.tb09941.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Takahashi H, Nakaya T, Nakamura Y, Asahi S, Onishi Y, Ikebuchi K, Takahashi TA, Katoh T, Sekiquchi S, Takazawa M, Tanaka H, Ikuta K: Higher prevalence of Borna disease virus infection in blood donors living near thoroughbred horse farms. J Med Virol Jul. 1997, 52: 330-335. 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9071(199707)52:3<330::AID-JMV16>3.0.CO;2-M.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Iwata Y, Takahashi K, Peng X, Fukuda K, Ohno K, Ogawa T, Gonda K, Mori N, Niwa S, Shigeta S: Detection and sequence analysis of Borna disease virus p24 RNA from peripheral blood mononuclear cells of patients with mood disorders or schizophrenia and of blood donors. J Virol. 1998, 72: 10044-10049.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Yamaguchi K, Sawada T, Naraki T, Iqata-Yi R, Shiraki H, Horii Y, Ishii T, Ikeda K, Asou N, Okabe H, Mochizuki M, Takahashi K, Yamada S, Kubo K, Yashiki S, Waltrip RW, Carbone KM: Detection of borna disease virus-reactive antibodies from patients with psychiatric disorders and from horses by electrochemiluminescence immunoassay. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol. 1999, 6: 696-700.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Chalmers RM, Thomas DR, Salmon RL: Borna disease virus and the evidence for human pathogenicity: a systematic review. QJM. 2005, 98: 255-274. 10.1093/qjmed/hci039.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kinnunen PM, Billich C, Ek-Kommonen C, Henttonen H, Kallio RK, Niemimaa J, Palva A, Staeheli P, Vaheri A, Vapalahti O: Serological evidence for Borna disease virus infection in humans, wild rodents and other vertebrates in Finland. J Clin Virol. 2007, 38: 64-69. 10.1016/j.jcv.2006.10.003.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Na KS, Tae SH, Song JW, Kim YK: Failure to detect Borna disease virus antibody and 334 RNA from peripheral blood mononuclear cells of psychiatric patients. Psychiatry Investig. 2009, 6: 306-312. 10.4306/pi.2009.6.4.306.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hornig M, Briese T, Licinio J, Khabbaz RF, Altshuler LL, Potkin SG, Schwemmle M, Siemetzki U, Mintz J, Honkavuori K, Kraemer HC, Egan MF, Whybrow PC, Bunney WE, Lipkin WI: Absence of evidence for bornavirus infection in schizophrenia, bipolar disorder and major depressive disorder. Mol Psychiatry. 2012, 17: 486-493. 10.1038/mp.2011.179.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Li D, Lei Y, Deng J, Zhou C, Zhang Y, Li W, Huang H, Cheng S, Zhang H, Zhang L, Huang R, Liu X, Ma L, Wang X, Li J, Xie P: Human but not laboratory Borna disease virus inhibits proliferation and induces apoptosis in human oligodendrocytes in vitro. PLoS ONE. 2013, 8: e66623-10.1371/journal.pone.0066623. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0066623PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Davidson F, Lycett C, Petrik J, Fazakerley JK: Investigation of frequency of active Borna disease virus infection in Scottish blood donors. Vox Sang. 2004, 86: 148-150. 10.1111/j.0042-9007.2004.00395.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Anand AAP: Is blood transfusion safe? BDV and neuropsychiatric illness. Acta Neuropsychiatrica. 2010, 22: 208-10.1111/j.1601-5215.2010.00473.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Horimoto T, Takahashi H, Sakaquchi M, Horikoshi K, Iritani S, Kazamatsuri H, Ikeda K, Tashiro M: A reverse-type sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for detecting antibodies to Borna disease virus. J Clin Microbiol. 1997, 35: 1661-1666.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Fukuda K, Takahashi K, Iwata Y, Mori N, Gonda K, Ogawa T, Osonoe K, Sato M, Ogata S, Horimoto T, Sawada T, Tashiro M, Yamaguchi K, Niwa S, Shigeta S: Immunological and PCR analyses for Borna disease virus in psychiatric patients and blood donors in Japan. J Clin Microbiol. 2001, 39: 419-429. 10.1128/JCM.39.2.419-429.2001.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hagiwara K, Kamitani W, Takamura S, Taniyama H, Nakaya T, Tanaka H, Kirisawa R, Iwai H, Ikuta K: Detection of Borna Disease Virus in a mare and her fetus. Vet Microbiol. 2000, 72: 207-216. 10.1016/S0378-1135(99)00206-0.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Okamoto M, Hagiwara K, Kamitani W, Sako T, Hirayama K, Kirisawa R, Tsuji M, Ishihara C, Iwai H, Kobayashi T, Tomonaga K, Ikuta K, Taniyama H: Experimental vertical transmission of Borna disease virus in the mouse. Arch Virol. 2003, 148: 1557-1568. 10.1007/s00705-003-0120-y.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Mitchell LA, Zhang T, Tingle AJ: Differential antibody responses to rubella virus infection in males and females. J Infect Dis. 1992, 166: 1258-1265. 10.1093/infdis/166.6.1258.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Mitchell LA, Tingle AJ, Decarie D, Laieunesse C: Serologic responses to measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) vaccine in healthy infants: failure to respond to measles and mumps components may influence decisions on timing of the second dose of MMR. Can J Public Health. 1998, 89: 325-328.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lahita RG: The role of sex hormones in systemic lupus erythematosus. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 1999, 11: 352-356. 10.1097/00002281-199909000-00005.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sieck GC: Genome and hormones: an integrated approach to gender differences in physiology. J Appl Physiol. 2001, 91: 1485-1486.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Grimaldi CM: Sex and systemic lupus erythematosus: the role of the sex hormones estrogen and prolactin on the regulation of autoreactive B cells. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2006, 18: 456-461. 10.1097/01.bor.0000240354.37927.dd.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Rifkind D, Frey JA: Sex difference in antibody response of CFW mice to Candida albicans. Infect Immun. 1972, 5: 695-698.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Jacobson JD, Ansari MA: Immunomodulatory actions of gonadal steroids may be mediated by gonadotropin-releasing hormone. Endocrinology. 2004, 145: 330-336. 10.1210/en.2003-0510.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sobocki P, Jönsson B, Angst J, Rehnberg C: Cost of depression in Europe. J Ment Health Policy Econ. 2006, 9: 87-98.PubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.