Open Access

Application of real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction to the detection the matrix, H5 and H7 genes of avian influenza viruses in field samples from South Korea

  • Hye-Ryoung Kim1,
  • Jae-Ku Oem1,
  • You-Chan Bae1,
  • Min-Su Kang1,
  • Hee-Soo Lee1 and
  • Yong-Kuk Kwon1Email author
Virology Journal201310:85

https://doi.org/10.1186/1743-422X-10-85

Received: 5 October 2012

Accepted: 6 March 2013

Published: 14 March 2013

Abstract

Background

The rapid and accurate identification of the H5 and H7 subtypes of avian influenza (AI) virus is an important step for the control and eradication of highly pathogenic AI outbreaks and for the surveillance of AI viruses that have the potential to undergo changes in pathogenicity in poultry and wild birds. Currently, real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RRT-PCR) is routinely used for the rapid detection of the H5 and H7 genes, but misidentification is frequent for emergent isolates and viruses isolated from diverse regions due to the high sequence variation among AI viruses.

Findings

In this study, an RRT-PCR method was tested for the detection of matrix, H5 and H7 genes from diverse subtypes of AI viruses and from field samples obtained through AI surveillance in South Korea over the last four years. Both RRT-PCR and conventional experiment (virus isolation using egg inoculation followed by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction) agreed on the virus-positive samples. And the comparison of the results with 174 clinical samples showed a high level of agreement without decreasing the specificity and sensitivity.

Conclusions

This assay could be useful tool for the rapid detection of AI using the field samples from domestic poultry and wild birds in South Korea, and continuous regional updates is needed to validate primer sets as the AI virus evolves.

Keywords

Avian influenza virus Real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RRT-PCR) H5 and H7 subtype Virus detection

Findings

Influenza A viruses are classified on the basis of the antigenic properties of their surface glycoproteins hemagglutinin (HA) and neuraminidase (NA). Influenza A has been demonstrated to have 16 HA subtype and 9 NA subtypes, and viruses of all subtypes and viruses of the majority of possible combinations have been isolated from avian species [1, 2].

Influenza A viruses containing the HAs of subtypes H5 and H7 may become highly pathogenic upon introduction into poultry, and highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) viruses causing devastating economic losses in the poultry industry have been found to belong to the H5 or H7 subtype [36]. Therefore, the ability to rapidly characterize AI viruses is crucial for facilitating the timely implementation of control measures [7].

Real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RRT-PCR) assays have been developed and are used globally: these assays are used for the rapid detection of H5 in many Asian countries (H5N1 epidemic) and as a screening method in several countries in Europe and North America [811]. The evaluation and design of primer and probe sets are key elements in establishing a method to identify AI subtypes due to the high sequence variation among AI viruses of diverse origins and the emergence of new isolates [12, 13].

Virus isolation (VI) using egg inoculation and conventional reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) has been conducted for the diagnosis of AI in South Korea since the first HPAI outbreak in 2003. However, the establishment of RRT-PCR as a first-line screening method to process high numbers of samples is important because of the increasing need for AI surveillance studies in wild birds and domestic ducks, which are hypothesized to be strong candidates for the introduction of HPAI and to be reassortment vessels [14, 15].

A 10% homogenate of feces or cloacal swabs was prepared in phosphate-buffered saline and centrifuged, and the supernatant was used to inoculate the embryonating chicken eggs (ECEs). Viruses tested were propagated in 9- to 11- day-old ECEs and harvested from allantoic fluids of inoculated eggs after 4 days of incubation at 37°C. Hemagglutination (HA) test was practiced with the collected allantoic fluids using 1% chicken red blood cell. Viral RNA was extracted from HA positive-allantoic fluids using Viral Gene-spin™ Viral DNA/RNA extraction kit (iNtRON biotechnology, Inc., South Korea). AI viruses were subtyped using RT-PCR tests that were performed using the AccuPower® RT-PCR premix (Bioneer, Daejeon, South Korea) amplification reagents and the primer sets from previously published reports [1619] by using the following temperature profile: one cycle of 30 min at 42°C and 5 min at 94°C, 40 cycles that each consisted of 30-s at 94°C, 30-s at 57°C and 30-s at 72°C, and extension at 72°C for 10 min. The RT-PCR products were run on a 1% agarose gel stained with ethidium bromide and electrophoresed at 100 V for 20 min.

For new RRT-PCR test, viral RNA was extracted from the supernatant of field samples using the same kit mentioned above. And all RRT-PCR assays were performed with a one-step PrimeScript™ RT-PCR kit (TaKaRa, Kyoto, Japan) in a 25-μl master reaction mixture containing the following components: 12.5 μl of kit-supplied 2X One-Step RT-PCR buffer III, 0.5 μl of kit-supplied TaKaRa Ex Taq™ HS, 0.5 μl of kit-supplied PrimeScript™ RT enzyme Mix II, 4 μl of RNA template and 0.5 μl each of forward and reverse primer (20 pmol), 0.5 μl of probe (6 pmol) and sufficient RNase-free water to bring the final volume to 25 μl. RRT-PCR assays were performed in a Smart Cycler II thermocycler with the following thermocycling conditions: a 5-min reverse transcription step at 42°C, a 10-sec heat activation of the Taq polymerase at 95°C a 40 cycles of PCR amplification. The conditions for each PCR varied depending on the target gene as follows: for the matrix gene, we used a 1-s denaturation at 95°C and a 20-s step annealing at 60°C; for the H5 subtype gene, we used a 1-s denaturation at 95°C, a 20-s annealing step at 57°C and a 5-s e1ongation step at 72°C; and for the H7 subtype gene, we used a 1-s denaturation step at 95°C, a 20-s annealing step at 45°C and a 5-s step e1ongation at 72°C.

Previous published forward and reverse primers and probes for the matrix and H5 genes [20, 21] were observed the concern for sensitivity to detect low pathogenic avian influenza (LPAI) viruses including H5 subtype isolated in South Korea. Based on sequence comparison including 40 LPAI H5 gene, 70 HPAI H5 genes and Korean AI viruses genes [GenBank: JX235977 to JX236026, JX258651 and JX258652], the primer and probe sets were used intact or were modified to contain 1 or 2 mixed bases (Table 1 and Additional file 1: Table S2). The primer and probe sets for the H7 genes were designed in this study using sequences (37 genes from Eurasian-lineage viruses and 20 genes from South Korea strains) downloaded from the Influenza Virus (Table 1). Because of the significant sequence variability of H7 genes, multiple alignment was performed and primers and probe were designed to minimize nucleotide mismatches in the Eurasian H7 viruses (data not shown). All probes were labeled at the 5 end with 6-carboxyfluorescein (FAM) (reporter dye) and at the 3 end with the 6- carboxytetramethylrhodamine (TAMRA) (quencher dye).
Table 1

Primers and probes for detecting of matix, H5 and H7 genes of avian influenza viruses

Gene

Primer or probe

Sequence

Product size (bp)

Reference

Matrix

M-Kr forward

AAGACCAATCCTGTCACCTCTGA

104

[21]

M-Kr reverse

CAAAGCGTCTACGCTGCAGTCC

[21]

M-Kr probe

FAM-TTTGTNTTYACGCTCACCGTGCC-TAMRA

modified [21]

H5

H5-Kr forward

TGACTACCCGCAGTATTCAG

145

[20]

H5-Kr reverse

AGACCAGCTAYCATGATTGC

modified [20]

H5-Kr probe

FAM-TCAACAGTGGCRAGTTCCYTAGCA-TAMRA

modified [20]

H7

H7-Kr forward

ATAGCRGGTTTYATTGAAAA

134

newly designed

H7-Kr reverse

CCTGTTATTTGATCAATTGC

newly designed

H7-Kr probe

FAM-TGGGAAGGTCTVRTTGAYGG-TAMRA

newly designed

The 50% egg infectious dose (EID50) titers were determined in 11-day-old SPF ECEs, and virus titers were calculated by the Reed and Muench method [22]. To calculate the limit of detection of RRT-PCR method, RNAs from A/duck/Korea/Cheonan/2010(H5N1) of 7.8 logEID50/0.1 ml titer and A/duck/Korea/A76/2010(H7N7) of 6.8 logEID50/0.1 ml titer were extracted and serially diluted 10-fold in molecular biology-grade water and tested with Table 1 primer sets.

The sensitivity and specificity of the RRT-PCR assay were compared with those of VI in embryonating eggs combined with RT-PCR using 15 reference influenza viruses with different HA types, 71 isolates of Korean AI viruses, and 174 fecal or cloacal samples collected during the HPAI outbreak season from 2010 to 2011 in South Korea.

The primer and probe set was tested with RNA obtained from influenza virus isolates representing all 15 HA subtypes of human- and avian-origin influenza viruses and 71 avian influenza viruses with various subtypes isolated from South Korea. The matrix primer set was able to detect most of the type A influenza viruses. The RRT-PCR for the matrix gene detected 98.8% of 86 influenza A viruses of various subtypes and origins and showed high sensitivity (Table 2 and Additional file 1: Table S1). The A/duck/Czechoslovakia/1956(H4N6) virus was not detected by the matrix primer set; the sequence of this old H4N6 strain has one mismatch each with the reverse primer and the probe in this set.
Table 2

Real-time RT-PCR application to avian influenza viruses * isolated in South Korea (No. of positive result/No. of tested viruses)

 

H1

H2

H3

H4

H5

H6

H7

H9

H10

H11

H12

Total

M

6/6

3/3

9/9

8/8

10/10

6/6

8/8

8/8

6/6

5/5

2/2

71/71

H5

-

-

-

-

9/10

-

-

-

-

-

-

9/10

H7

-

-

-

-

-

-

8/8

-

-

-

-

8/8

*List of Korean AI viruses was shown in Additional file 1: Table S2.

Not test.

A/wildbird/L60-2/08(H5N2) virus was not detected.

The H5 and H7 primer sets detected the RNAs from the virus isolates of their respective subtypes. The RRT-PCR assays for H5 and H7 showed positive results for most of LPAI viruses of the H5 and H7 subtypes and for two H5N1 HPAI viruses isolated in 2006 and 2010 in South Korea, but the A/wild bird/L60-2/2008(H5N2) virus was not detected (Table 2 and Additional file 1: Table S1). The A/wild bird/L60-2/2008(H5N2) virus is known to exhibit an unusual sequence relative to other H5N2 LPAI viruses isolated in South Korea [23, 24].

A total of 174 clinical samples were collected from 58 chickens, 64 domestic ducks and 52 wild birds with suspected HPAI infections. A total of 101 samples of the 174 samples were positive for type A influenza virus by both VI plus RT-PCR and RRT-PCR. Sixty-nine samples were negative for type A influenza virus by both methods. Four samples were positive by RRT-PCR but negative by VI plus RT-PCR. Seventy-nine H5 samples and 2 H7 samples were positive in both assays, and 95 and 172 samples, respectively, were negative in both assays (Table 3). The results of the VI plus RT-PCR assay and the RRT-PCR assay for detecting the H5 and H7 genes did not differ, but the two assays did not agree with respect to the matrix gene for four samples. These samples were collected from one domestic duck and three mallards and the results of the RRT-PCR assay for the matrix gene showed high Ct values (> 38), that were close to the cutoff of 40 cycles to be considered negative.
Table 3

Summary of real-time RT-PCR and virus isolation/RT-PCR results for 174 individual samples from poultry and wild birds

 

Current method

New method (real time RT-PCR)

(VI/RT-PCR)

Positive

Negative

(No. of samples)

M

positive (101)

101

0

Negative (73)

4

69

H5

positive (79)

79

0

negative (95)

0

95

H7

positive (2)

2

0

negative (172)

0

172

Therefore, the sensitivity of this new method assay to detecting the M, H5 and H7 genes of AI viruses were 99.5% (186/187), 98.9% (89/90) and 100% (11/11) and the specificity of that were 94.5% (69/73), 100% (170/170) and 100% (249/249), respectively.

The average detection limits (50% egg infective doses [EID50]/0.1 ml) of the matrix, H5 and H7 genes were 101.8, 102.8 and 101.8 EID50/0.1 ml, respectively.

Since the 2008 H5N1 HPAI outbreak in South Korea, hundreds of thousands of samples have been collected every year from wild birds in migratory bird habitats, from domestic ducks on farms and from poultry at live bird markets for the detection AI viruses to control the spread of HPAI [14, 25]. However, VI plus RT-PCR protocol, the standard method for AI surveillance, is time and labor intensive and there is a possibility of cross-contamination when handling the infectious samples. Therefore, we applied and evaluated the RRT-PCR as a screening method for AI virus detection and subtyping using the clinical samples. This assay showed high sensitivity and specificity in the evaluation of AI viruses of diverse origins and various HA types and in the evaluation of clinical samples, relative to the VI plus RT-PCR assay.

However, the test failed to detect the matrix gene of the A/duck/Czechoslovakia/1956(H4N6) virus and the H5 gene of the A/wild bird/L60-2/2008(H5N2) virus, although one or two mismatches are tolerable. The reason for this failure is unclear, but it may be due to the mismatch in the reverse primer with both viruses and not to the mismatches in the probes [26]. There were false positive results for the matrix gene for four fecal samples from three wild birds and a domestic duck. The high Ct values were near the cutoff for a negative result, and additional studies must be performed to determine the best method to remove RRT-PCR inhibitors associated with fecal samples.

Reports of the validation of any test generally specify the species and type of sample tested [27]. Our study was performed using diverse AI viruses isolated in South Korea from 2008 to 2011 and clinical samples from poultry and wild birds collected during the H5N1 HPAI outbreak from 2010 to 2011. Moreover, the isolation of many AI viruses, sequencing analysis and AI virus characterization in South Korea enabled us to apply and evaluate this RRT-PCR assay [23, 25, 2831].

This RRT-PCR test described in the present study could be a useful diagnostic tool for rapid screening and surveillance in wild birds and poultry. The identification of the H5 and H7 genes for the rapid detection of HPAI is important as a control measure of outbreak. And the detection of the M gene of influenza A virus from the field samples of wild birds and poultry is also necessary for the further study like virus isolation and characterization of AI viruses, as a few known pandemics in humans and several outbreaks in poultry have had their origins in LPAI viruses of other subtypes [32].

Finally, the regularly re-evaluation of this assay is essential to use as the official tool for AI surveillance in South Korea, because the HA gene of Influenza A virus is well known for its high sequence divergence both between and within subtypes [33] and newly evolving emergent viruses could be introduced from other countries H5N1 HPAI endemic.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Hyuk-Man Kwon for his excellent technical assistance. This work was supported by a grant from the National Animal Disease Control Project of the Ministry of Food, Agriculture, Forest and Fisheries, Republic of Korea.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Animal, Plant and Fisheries Quarantine and Inspection Agency

References

  1. Alexander D, Brown I: Recent zoonoses caused by influenza A viruses. Revue scientifique et technique (International Office of Epizootics) 2000, 19: 197.Google Scholar
  2. Fouchier R, Munster V, Wallensten A, Bestebroer T, Herfst S, Smith D, Rimmelzwaan G, Olsen B, Osterhaus A: Characterization of a novel influenza A virus hemagglutinin subtype (H16) obtained from black-headed gulls. J Virol 2005, 79: 2814. 10.1128/JVI.79.5.2814-2822.2005PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Lee CW, Swayne DE, Linares JA, Senne DA, Suarez DL: H5N2 avian influenza outbreak in Texas in 2004: the first highly pathogenic strain in the United States in 20 years? J Virol 2005, 79: 11412-11421. 10.1128/JVI.79.17.11412-11421.2005PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Banks J, Speidel E, Moore E, Plowright L, Piccirillo A, Capua I, Cordioli P, Fioretti A, Alexander D: Changes in the haemagglutinin and the neuraminidase genes prior to the emergence of highly pathogenic H7N1 avian influenza viruses in Italy. Arch Virol 2001, 146: 963-973. 10.1007/s007050170128PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Lasley FA: Economics of avian influenza: control vs noncontrol. Avian Dis 2003, 47: 390-399.Google Scholar
  6. Halvorson D, Capua I, Cardona C, Frame D, Karunakaran D, Marangon S, Ortali G, Roepke D, Woo-Ming B: The economics of avian influenza control. Proc. 52nd Western Poultry Disease Conference, Sacramento, CA 2003, 5-7.Google Scholar
  7. Zhao S, Jin M, Li H, Tan Y, Wang G, Zhang R, Chen H: Detection of antibodies to the nonstructural protein (NS1) of avian influenza viruses allows distinction between vaccinated and infected chickens. Avian Dis 2005, 49: 488-493. 10.1637/7321-010405R1.1PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Van der Goot J, Koch G, De Jong M, Van Boven M: Quantification of the effect of vaccination on transmission of avian influenza (H7N7) in chickens. PNAS USA 2005, 102: 18141. 10.1073/pnas.0505098102PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Cattoli G, Drago A, Maniero S, Toffan A, Bertoli E, Fassina S, Terregino C, Robbi C, Vicenzoni G, Capua I: Comparison of three rapid detection systems for type A influenza virus on tracheal swabs of experimentally and naturally infected birds. Avian Pathol 2004, 33: 432-437. 10.1080/03079450410001724058PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Spackman E, Senne DA, Myers T, Bulaga LL, Garber LP, Perdue ML, Lohman K, Daum LT, Suarez DL: Development of a real-time reverse transcriptase PCR assay for type A influenza virus and the avian H5 and H7 hemagglutinin subtypes. J Clin Microbiol 2002, 40: 3256-3260. 10.1128/JCM.40.9.3256-3260.2002PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Tsukamoto K, Noguchi D, Suzuki K, Shishido M, Ashizawa T, Kim MC, Lee YJ, Tada T: Broad detection of diverse H5 and H7 hemagglutinin genes of avian influenza viruses by real-time reverse transcription-PCR using primer and probe sets containing mixed bases. J Clin Microbiol 2010, 48: 4275-4278. 10.1128/JCM.01264-10PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Peter PMLS: Orthomyxoviridae: the viruses and their replication. In Fields virology. 5th edition. Edited by: Knipe DM, Howley PM. Philadephia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2007.Google Scholar
  13. Swayne DE, Halvorson DA: Influenza. In Disease of poultry. Edited by: Saif YM, Barnes HJ, Glisom JR, Fadly AM, McDougald LR, Swayne DE. Ames, Iowa: Iowa State University Press; 2003:135-160.Google Scholar
  14. Kim HR, Kim BS, Bae YC, Moon OK, Oem JK, Kang HM, Choi JG, Lee O: H5N1 subtype highly pathogenic avian influenza virus isolated from healthy mallard captured in South Korea. Vet Microbiol 2011, 151: 386-389. 10.1016/j.vetmic.2011.03.004PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Gu M, Liu W, Cao Y, Peng D, Wang X, Wan H, Zhao G, Xu Q, Zhang W, Song Q, Li Y, Liu X: Novel Reassortant highly pathogenic avian influenza (H5N5) viruses in domestic ducks, china. Emerg Infect Dis 2011, 17: 1060-1063. 10.3201/eid1706.101406PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Fereidouni SR, Starick E, Grund C, Globig A, Mettenleiter TC, Beer M, Harder T: Rapid molecular subtyping by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction of the neuraminidase gene of avian influenza A viruses. Vet Microbiol 2009, 135: 253-260. 10.1016/j.vetmic.2008.09.077PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Fouchier R, Bestebroer T, Herfst S, Van Der Kemp L, Rimmelzwaan G, Osterhaus A: Detection of influenza A viruses from different species by PCR amplification of conserved sequences in the matrix gene. J Clin Microbiol 2000, 38: 4096-4101.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Lee M, Chang P, Shien J, Cheng M, Shieh H: Identification and subtyping of avian influenza viruses by reverse transcription-PCR. J Virol Meth 2001, 97: 13-22. 10.1016/S0166-0934(01)00301-9View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Munch M, Nielsen L, Handberg K, Jørgensen P: Detection and subtyping (H5 and H7) of avian type A influenza virus by reverse transcription-PCR and PCR-ELISA. Arch Virol 2001, 146: 87-97. 10.1007/s007050170193PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Suarez DL, Das A, Ellis E: Review of rapid molecular diagnostic tools for avian influenza virus. Avian Dis 2007, 51: 201-208. 10.1637/7732-101006-REGR.1PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Ward C, Dempsey M, Ring C, Kempson R, Zhang L, Gor D, Snowden B, Tisdale M: Design and performance testing of quantitative real time PCR assays for influenza A and B viral load measurement. J Clin Microbiol 2004, 29: 179-188.Google Scholar
  22. Reed L, Muench H: A simple method of estimating fifty per cent endpoints. American J Epidemiol 1938, 27: 493.Google Scholar
  23. Kim HR, Park CK, Oem JK, Bae YC, Choi JG, Lee OS, Lee YJ: Characterization of H5N2 influenza viruses isolated in South Korea and their influence on the emergence of a novel H9N2 influenza virus. J Gen Virol 2010, 91: 1978-1983. 10.1099/vir.0.021238-0PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Briand FX, Niqueux E, Brochet AL, Hars J, Jestin V: Unusual H5N2 Avian Influenza Virus Escapes Current Detection. J Clin Microbiol 2011, 49: 2376-2377. 10.1128/JCM.00479-11PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Kim HR, Lee YJ, Lee KK, Oem JK, Kim SH, Lee MH, Lee O: Genetic relatedness of H6 subtype avian influenza viruses isolated from wild birds and domestic ducks in Korea and their pathogenicity in animals. J Gen Virol 91: 208-209.Google Scholar
  26. Kim LM, Afonso CL, Suarez DL: Effect of probe-site mismatches on detection of virulent Newcastle disease viruses using a fusion-gene real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction test. J Vet Diagn Invest 2006, 18: 519. 10.1177/104063870601800601PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Jacobson RH: Principles of validation of diagnostic assays for infectious disease. In Manual of diagnostic tests and vaccines for terrestrial animals. Chapter 1.1.4. Paris, France: World organization for Animal Health; 2006:34-45.Google Scholar
  28. Kim HR, Park CK, Lee YJ, Woo GH, Lee KK, Oem JG, Kim SH, Jean YH, Bae YC, Yoon SS: An outbreak of highly pathogenic H5N1 avian influenza in Korea. Vet Microbiol 2008, 141: 362-366.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Lee YJ, Choi YK, Kim YJ, Song MS, Jeong OM, Lee EK, Jeon WJ, Jeong W, Joh SJ, Choi KS: Highly pathogenic avian influenza virus (H5N1) in domestic poultry and relationship with migratory birds, South Korea. Emerg Infect Dis 2008, 14: 487-490. 10.3201/eid1403.070767PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Kim HR, Park CK, Lee YJ, Oem JK, Kang HM, Choi JG, Lee OS, Bae YC: Low pathogenic H7 subtype avian influenza viruses isolated from domestic ducks in South Korea and the close association with isolates of wild birds. J Gen Virol 2012, 93: 1278-1287. 10.1099/vir.0.041269-0PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Kim HR, Lee YJ, Oem JK, Bae YC, Kang MS, Kang HM, Choi JG, Park CK, Kwon YK: Characterization of H10 subtype avian influenza viruses isolated from wild birds in South Korea. Vet Microbiol 2012, 161: 222-228. 10.1016/j.vetmic.2012.07.014PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Munster VJ, Veen J, Olsen B, Vogel R, Osterhaus ADME, Fouchier RAM: Towards improved influenza A virus surveillance in migrating birds. Vaccine 2006, 24: 6729-6733. 10.1016/j.vaccine.2006.05.060PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Suarez DL: Evolution of avian influenza viruses. Vet Microbiol 2000, 74: 15-27. 10.1016/S0378-1135(00)00161-9PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Kim et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement