The PB2, PA, HA, NP, and NS genes of a highly pathogenic avian influenza virus A/whooper swan/Mongolia/3/2005 (H5N1) are responsible for pathogenicity in ducks
© Kajihara et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 11 July 2012
Accepted: 28 January 2013
Published: 2 February 2013
Wild ducks are the natural hosts of influenza A viruses. Duck influenza, therefore, has been believed inapparent infection with influenza A viruses, including highly pathogenic avian influenza viruses (HPAIVs) in chickens. In fact, ducks experimentally infected with an HPAIV strain, A/Hong Kong/483/1997 (H5N1) (HK483), did not show any clinical signs. Another HPAIV strain, A/whooper swan/Mongolia/3/2005 (H5N1) (MON3) isolated from a dead swan, however, caused neurological dysfunction and death in ducks.
To understand the mechanism whereby MON3 shows high pathogenicity in ducks, HK483, MON3, and twenty-four reassortants generated between these two H5N1 viruses were compared for their pathogenicity in domestic ducks.
None of the ducks infected with MON3-based single-gene reassortants bearing the PB2, NP, or NS gene segment of HK483 died, and HK483-based single-gene reassortants bearing PB2, NP, or NS genes of MON3 were not pathogenic in ducks, suggesting that multiple gene segments contribute to the pathogenicity of MON3 in ducks. All the ducks infected with the reassortant bearing PB2, PA, HA, NP, and NS gene segments of MON3 died within five days post-inoculation, as did those infected with MON3. Each of the viruses was assessed for replication in ducks three days post-inoculation. MON3 and multi-gene reassortants pathogenic in ducks were recovered from all of the tissues examined and replicated with high titers in the brains and lungs.
The present results indicate that multigenic factors are responsible for efficient replication of MON3 in ducks. In particular, virus growth in the brain might correlate with neurological dysfunction and the disease severity.
Influenza A viruses have eight-segmented, negative, and single-stranded RNA genomes and are serologically divided into 16 hemagglutinin (HA) (H1-H16) and 9 neuraminidase (NA) (N1-N9) subtypes [1, 2]. Influenza A viruses are widely distributed in birds and mammals, including humans. Ecological studies have revealed that wild waterbirds, especially migratory ducks, are the natural hosts of influenza A viruses. Each of the known subtypes of influenza A virus has been perpetuated among water birds and in the water of the lakes where they nest in summer [3, 4]. Furthermore, influenza A viruses circulating in nature are nonpathogenic in ducks and evolutionarily static [5, 6], suggesting that the viruses and hosts have reached a long-established adaptive optimum.
Influenza A viruses maintained in ducks usually do not transmit to and infect chickens directly. It is known that low pathogenic viruses occasionally infect chickens after passage in domestic water birds such as ducks and geese and terrestrial birds such as quails and turkeys, and then may acquire high pathogenicity in chickens through multiple transmissions in the chicken population . Highly pathogenic avian influenza viruses (HPAIVs) are so far restricted to H5 and H7 viruses, although most of the viruses of these subtypes are not highly pathogenic in chickens . In 1997, outbreaks of highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) occurred at live bird markets in Hong Kong and human cases of infection with the H5N1 virus were found [9, 10]. Since then, H5N1 HPAIVs have thus been circulating in poultry for more than a decade .
It was generally thought that ducks could tolerate infection with influenza A viruses, including HPAIVs. In fact, A/Hong Kong/483/1997 (H5N1) (HK483) was not lethal for experimentally infected ducks ; however, in 2002, a large number of water birds, including ducks, geese, and other birds, died due to infection with H5N1 HPAIVs in Hong Kong . In 2005, approximately six thousand migratory water birds were found dead with H5N1 virus infection in Qinghai Lake, China [14, 15] and then virus strains of this subtype have been isolated in the Middle East, Europe, and Africa . Since 2005, H5N1 HPAIVs originating from southern China have been isolated from dead aquatic birds such as swans and geese on their migratory routes to the northern nesting lakes in spring in Japan, Mongolia, and Russia [17–19]. It was reported that ducks experimentally infected with A/whooper swan/Mongolia/3/2005 (H5N1) (MON3) showed neurological dysfunction and died . The mechanism whereby these H5N1 HPAIVs show high pathogenicity in ducks is still unclear.
In chickens, it is well known that insertion of a pair of dibasic amino acid residues at the cleavage site of the HA renders avian influenza viruses capable of infecting endothelial cells, followed by systemic infection [20–22]. Both HK483 and MON3 have multiple basic amino acid residues at the HA cleavage site, representing their high pathogenicity in chickens. The difference in pathogenicity in ducks between HK483 and MON3 hence suggests that factors other than the cleavage activation of the HA molecule contribute to the pathogenicity in ducks. To understand the molecular basis of the high pathogenicity of MON3 in ducks, reassortants were generated between HK483 and MON3 by reverse genetics and compared for their pathogenicity in domestic ducks. The present results indicate that multigenic factors were involved in the high pathogenicity of MON3 in ducks.
Pathogenicity of H5N1 viruses in ducks of different ages
Comparison of pathogenicity of HK483 and MON3 in 1-day-, 2-week-, and 4-week-old ducks
Age of ducks
5.4, 2.5, 2.5
5.5, 4.5, 2.5
-, -, -d
4.3, 3.5, 2.5
-, -, -
2.5, -, -
8.8, 7.3, 7.3
8.5, 5.5, 5.3
5.5, 4.5, -
4.5, 2.5, 3.7
Gene segments responsible for pathogenicity of MON3 in ducks
Replication of reassortants in 2-week-old ducks
Homology of viral genes and proteins between HK483 and MON3
Amino acid (%)
No. of different amino acids
The present study demonstrated that the PB2, NP, and NS genes of MON3 were prerequisite for high pathogenicity in ducks (Figures 1, 2, 4, and 5). Some explorations to clarify the relationship between the constellation of gene segments and pathogenicity of influenza A viruses were hitherto performed mainly using mammals, such as mice, ferrets, and monkeys [26–29]. These reports showed that the growth potential of reassortants differed depending on the constellation of the polymerase genes, suggesting the major contribution of the polymerases to efficient replication in mammals. NP was also shown to play an important role in the efficient replication and expansion of tissue tropism of H5N1 HPAIVs in chickens [30, 31]. Recently, it was demonstrated that the interaction of PB2 and NP with importin-α, a host factor mediating trafficking into the nucleus, where transcription and replication of the viral genome occur, was correlated with host adaptation of influenza A viruses . Amino acid differences of the PB2 and NP between HK483 and MON3 are 27 and 12 positions, respectively (Table 2). These differences are probably responsible for the incompatibility of the PB2 and NP of HK483 with viral proteins of MON3 to show high pathogenicity in ducks. Taken together, it is likely that the polymerase and the NP of MON3 may play a principal role in efficient replication in systemic organs of ducks coordinately with employing host factors involved in virus replication.
Sarmento et al. investigated the contribution of the NS gene to the pathogenicity of H5N1 HPAIVs in ducks and discussed that the NS gene products had a minimal influence on the viral pathogenicity in ducks. Conversely, the present data showed that the NS gene segment of MON3 was also prerequisite for high pathogenicity in ducks (Figures 1 and 4). NS1, encoded in the NS gene, is well known to serve multiple functions in the life cycle of influenza A viruses . The major role of NS1 is considered to be the inhibition of host innate immune responses by limiting interferon production and the subsequent antiviral effects of interferon-induced proteins ; therefore, NS1 has been extensively studied as a molecular determinant of viral pathogenicity mainly in mice and chickens. It was recently reported that deletion of amino acid residues 80–84 in NS1, which is a very common characteristic among H5N1 HPAIVs isolated after 2000, enhanced the pathogenicity of H5N1 viruses in mice and chickens . It is noteworthy that MON3 also has the deletion of amino acid residues 80–84 in NS1 but HK483 does not; however, a plausible explanation of how NS1 with the deletion contributes to high pathogenicity is lacking and it is also unclear whether this finding is applicable to the pathogenicity of H5N1 viruses in ducks. Recently, Barber et al. demonstrated that the cytoplasmic pathogen sensor RIG-I, triggering antiviral effects by recognition of viral RNA, might be associated with the natural resistance of ducks to influenza A virus infection, while RIG-I homologue of chickens has not been identified. It is known that the NS1 of some strains interacted with RIG-I and blocked its signaling pathway and subsequent interferon-β induction ; therefore, it is of interest whether the NS1 of MON3 suppresses innate immune responses of ducks more strongly than that of HK483.
Consistent with the data of Pantin-Jackwood et al., the present study showed that the age of ducks is one of the factors which influenced their susceptibility to H5N1 HPAIVs. MON3 killed all of the 1-day- and 2-week-old ducks, but two of the three 4-week-old ducks infected with MON3 survived. While none of the ducks infected with HK483 died, this virus was recovered from the brains of 1-day-old ducks but not from the brains of 2- and 4-week-old ducks. As previously described by Kishida et al., virus replication in the brain might be a cause of death upon HPAIV infection. Neurological symptoms, such as torticollis, blindness, and convulsion, were distinct characteristics of MON3 infection of ducks. MON3 showed considerably strong tropism for the central nervous system of 2-week-old ducks but HK483 were not detected in their brains (Figure 3), suggesting that efficient virus replication in the brain might correlate with neurological dysfunction and death. It is also known that chickens and humans die of multiple organ failure upon H5N1 virus infection [38, 39]. In 2-week-old ducks, titers of MON3 were significantly higher than those of HK483 in all of the tissue tested (Figure 3). Furthermore, reassortants lethal to ducks showed wide tissue tropism and efficient replication in the lungs and brains (Figures 4 and 5); therefore, multiple organ failure also appeared to be critical for the high pathogenicity of MON3 in ducks.
The present study demonstrated that polygenic factors are involved in the high pathogenicity of MON3. In particular, the PB2, NP, and NS genes of MON3 were prerequisite. Emergence of H5N1 HPAIVs, which caused the death of the water birds in 2002, changed the idea that natural reservoir hosts (i.e., ducks) generally do not die due to influenza A virus infection. H5N1 HPAIVs that emerged in 1997 are still expanding their geographical distribution and the epidemiological study of HPAI in the 2010 migration season suggested the strong possibility that H5N1 HPAIVs might be perpetuated in a migratory bird population in the eastern Eurasian region . These trends underscore the increasing importance of further study on avian influenza in migratory birds. To control HPAI not only in poultry but also in wild birds, the molecular basis of the high pathogenicity of H5N1 viruses in ducks should be clarified, in addition to continued global monitoring of HPAIVs in a migratory bird population.
Experimental infection studies in ducks revealed that the PB2, NP, and NS gene segments of MON3 were prerequisite for the high pathogenicity of MON3 in ducks. A set of the PB2, PA, HA, NP, and NS gene segments of MON3 was required to show full pathogenicity in ducks. These data indicate that multigenic factors are responsible for the pathogenicity of MON3 in ducks. MON3 and reassortants that were lethal to ducks efficiently replicated in the tissues tested, especially in the brain, suggesting a possible correlation between virus growth in the brain and the death of ducks accompanying neurological dysfunction.
Viruses and cells
HK483 was isolated from throat aspirates of the third case of a 13-year-old girl. MON3 was isolated from the brain of a dead whooper swan found at Lake Khunt, Mongolia . Viruses were propagated in 10-day-old embryonated chicken eggs for 48 hours at 35°C. Madin-Darby canine kidney (MDCK) cells and human embryonic kidney 293 T (293 T) cells were cultured according to Tsuda et al..
Generation of reassortants by reverse genetics
Viral RNAs of HK483 and MON3 were extracted as described previously . Full-length genomes of the eight gene segments were cloned into a dual-promoter plasmid, pHW2000 . HK483, MON3, and 24 reassortants between HK483 and MON3 were generated by reverse genetics (Figures 1 and 2). Briefly, MDCK and 293 T cells were cocultured in Opti-MEM 1 (Invitrogen) and transfected with 1 μg of each of the eight plasmids using TransIT-293 (Mirus Bio) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. After six hours of incubation at 37°C, transfection mixture was replaced with Opti-MEM 1. At 72 hours post-transfection, culture supernatant was collected and injected into the allantoic cavity of 10-day-old chicken embryonated eggs. Virus titers in harvested allantoic fluids were determined by the method of Reed and Muench  using embryonated eggs and expressed as EID50 per milliliter.
Experimental infection of ducks
One-day-, 2-week-, and 4-week-old domestic ducks (Cherry Valley strain) were used to assess the pathogenicity of viruses. Viruses (106.0 EID50 in 100 μl of allantoic fluid) were inoculated intranasally into three to nine ducks and clinical signs were monitored at 24-hour intervals over 14 dpi. Undiluted virus stocks of the following seven reassortants were inoculated into ducks, because their titers in 100 μl allantoic fluids did not reach 106.0 EID50 despite attempts to increase their titers through several passages in embryonated eggs (i.e., 104.7, 105.5, 105.4, 104.5, 104.8, 105.0, and 104.5 EID50 were used for MON3 HA/HK483, MON3 NS/HK483, MON3 PB2-PA-NP-NS/HK483, MON3 PB2-HA-NP-NS/HK483, MON3 PB2-PB1-HA-NP-NS/HK483, MON3 PB2-PA-HA-NP-NS/HK483, and MON3 PB2-PB1-PA-HA-NP-NS/HK483, respectively). Ducks exhibiting severe disease signs were euthanized by intravenous injection of pentobarbital (Dainippon Sumitomo Pharma) and recorded as having died the next day. To examine virus replication, each of the reassortants was inoculated into two or three ducks as described above. On 3 dpi, ducks were euthanized and the brains and lungs of 1-day-old ducks and the brains, tracheas, lungs, kidneys, livers, and colons of 2- and 4-week-old ducks were collected aseptically. To make 10% suspensions in minimum essential medium (Nissui Pharmaceutical), the tissue samples were homogenized by a Multi-Beads Shocker (Yasui Kikai). Virus titers in these suspensions were determined by the same method as described above and expressed as EID50 per gram of tissue.
Experimental infection of ducks was carried out in the biosafety level 3 facilities at the Graduate School of Veterinary Medicine, Hokkaido University, Japan according to the Guidelines for Proper Conduct of Animal Experiments of the Science Council of Japan (http://www.scj.go.jp/ja/info/kohyo/pdf/kohyo-20-k16-2e.pdf). The protocol was approved by the Hokkaido University Animal Care and Use Committee (Permit Number: 08-0157).
This study was supported by Strategic Funds for the Promotion of Science and Technology (2011–2013), Japan. The present work was supported in part by the Japan Initiative for the Global Research Network on Infectious Diseases (J-GRID), the Program of Founding Research Centers for Emerging and Reemerging Infectious Disease from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology, Japan, and Japan Racing and Livestock Promotion Foundation. Gratitude is expressed to Dr. M. Tashiro, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Tokyo, Japan, for his generous donation of A/Hong Kong/483/1997 (H5N1). We also wish to thank Takikawa Shinseien, Hokkaido, Japan for providing the domestic ducks in this study. In addition, we would like to thank H. Shibuya for sequencing.
- Kawaoka Y, Cox NJ, Haller O, Hongo S, Kaverin N, Klenk HD, Lamb RA, McCauley J, Palese P, Rimstad E, Webster RG: Family Orthomyxoviridae. In Virus Taxonomy. 8th edition. Edited by: Fauquet CM, Mayo MA, Maniloff J, Desselberger U, Ball LA. California: Elsevier Academic Press; 2005:681-693.Google Scholar
- Fouchier RA, Munster V, Wallensten A, Bestebroer TM, Herfst S, Smith D, Rimmelzwaan GF, Olsen B, Osterhaus AD: Characterization of a novel influenza A virus hemagglutinin subtype (H16) obtained from black-headed gulls. J Virol 2005, 79: 2814-2822. 10.1128/JVI.79.5.2814-2822.2005PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ito T, Okazaki K, Kawaoka Y, Takada A, Webster RG, Kida H: Perpetuation of influenza A viruses in Alaskan waterfowl reservoirs. Arch Virol 1995, 140: 1163-1172. 10.1007/BF01322743PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Okazaki K, Takada A, Ito T, Imai M, Takakuwa H, Hatta M, Ozaki H, Tanizaki T, Nagano T, Ninomiya A, Demenov VA, Tyaptirganov MM, Karatayeva TD, Yamnikova SS, Lvov DK, Kida H: Precursor genes of future pandemic influenza viruses are perpetuated in ducks nesting in Siberia. Arch Virol 2000, 145: 885-893. 10.1007/s007050050681PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kida H, Yanagawa R, Matsuoka Y: Duck influenza lacking evidence of disease signs and immune response. Infect Immun 1980, 30: 547-553.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Kida H, Kawaoka Y, Neave CW, Webster RG: Antigenic and genetic conservation of H3 influenza virus in wild ducks. Virology 1987, 159: 109-119. 10.1016/0042-6822(87)90353-9PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kida H: Ecology of influenza viruses in nature, birds, and humans. Glob Environ Res 2008, 12: 9-14.Google Scholar
- Alexander DJ: A review of avian influenza in different bird species. Vet Microbiol 2000, 74: 3-13. 10.1016/S0378-1135(00)00160-7PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Shortridge KF, Zhou NN, Guan Y, Gao P, Ito T, Kawaoka Y, Kodihalli S, Krauss S, Markwell D, Murti KG, Norwood M, Senne D, Sims L, Takada A, Webster RG: Characterization of avian H5N1 influenza viruses from poultry in Hong Kong. Virology 1998, 252: 331-342. 10.1006/viro.1998.9488PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Centers for Disease Conrrol and Prevention (CDC): Isolation of avian influenza A(H5N1) viruses from humans--Hong Kong, May-December 1997. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 1997, 46: 1204-1207.Google Scholar
- Webster RG, Govorkova EA: H5N1 influenza–continuing evolution and spread. N Engl J Med 2006, 355: 2174-2177. 10.1056/NEJMp068205PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kishida N, Sakoda Y, Isoda N, Matsuda K, Eto M, Sunaga Y, Umemura T, Kida H: Pathogenicity of H5 influenza viruses for ducks. Arch Virol 2005, 150: 1383-1392. 10.1007/s00705-004-0473-xPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sturm-Ramirez KM, Ellis T, Bousfield B, Bissett L, Dyrting K, Rehg JE, Poon L, Guan Y, Peiris M, Webster RG: Reemerging H5N1 influenza viruses in Hong Kong in 2002 are highly pathogenic to ducks. J Virol 2004, 78: 4892-4901. 10.1128/JVI.78.9.4892-4901.2004PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Chen H, Smith GJ, Zhang SY, Qin K, Wang J, Li KS, Webster RG, Peiris JS, Guan Y: Avian flu: H5N1 virus outbreak in migratory waterfowl. Nature 2005, 436: 191-192. 10.1038/nature03974PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Liu J, Xiao H, Lei F, Zhu Q, Qin K, Zhang XW, Zhang XL, Zhao D, Wang G, Feng Y, Ma J, Liu W, Wang J, Gao GF: Highly pathogenic H5N1 influenza virus infection in migratory birds. Science 2005, 309: 1206. 10.1126/science.1115273PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wang G, Zhan D, Li L, Lei F, Liu B, Liu D, Xiao H, Feng Y, Li J, Yang B, Yin Z, Song X, Zhu X, Cong Y, Pu J, Wang J, Liu J, Gao GF, Zhu Q: H5N1 avian influenza re-emergence of Lake Qinghai: phylogenetic and antigenic analyses of the newly isolated viruses and roles of migratory birds in virus circulation. J Gen Virol 2008, 89: 697-702. 10.1099/vir.0.83419-0PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sakoda Y, Sugar S, Batchluun D, Erdene-Ochir TO, Okamatsu M, Isoda N, Soda K, Takakuwa H, Tsuda Y, Yamamoto N, Kishida N, Matsuno K, Nakayama E, Kajihara M, Yokoyama A, Takada A, Sodnomdarjaa R, Kida H: Characterization of H5N1 highly pathogenic avian influenza virus strains isolated from migratory waterfowl in Mongolia on the way back from the southern Asia to their northern territory. Virology 2010, 406: 88-94. 10.1016/j.virol.2010.07.007PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Okamatsu M, Tanaka T, Yamamoto N, Sakoda Y, Sasaki T, Tsuda Y, Isoda N, Kokumai N, Takada A, Umemura T, Kida H: Antigenic, genetic, and pathogenic characterization of H5N1 highly pathogenic avian influenza viruses isolated from dead whooper swans (Cygnus cygnus) found in northern Japan in 2008. Virus Genes 2010, 41: 351-357. 10.1007/s11262-010-0530-3PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Uchida Y, Mase M, Yoneda K, Kimura A, Obara T, Kumagai S, Saito T, Yamamoto Y, Nakamura K, Tsukamoto K, Yamaguchi S: Highly pathogenic avian influenza virus (H5N1) isolated from whooper swans. Japan. Emerg Infect Dis 2008, 14: 1427-1429. 10.3201/eid1409.080655PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Senne DA, Panigrahy B, Kawaoka Y, Pearson JE, Suss J, Lipkind M, Kida H, Webster RG: Survey of the hemagglutinin (HA) cleavage site sequence of H5 and H7 avian influenza viruses: amino acid sequence at the HA cleavage site as a marker of pathogenicity potential. Avian Dis 1996, 40: 425-437. 10.2307/1592241PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Park CH, Ozaki H, Takada A, Kida H, Ochiai K, Umemura T: Primary target cells of virulent strains of type A influenza virus in chicken embryos. Avian Pathol 2001, 30: 269-272. 10.1080/03079450120054677PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Muramoto Y, Ozaki H, Takada A, Park CH, Sunden Y, Umemura T, Kawaoka Y, Matsuda H, Kida H: Highly pathogenic H5N1 influenza virus causes coagulopathy in chickens. Microbiol Immunol 2006, 50: 73-81.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hulse-Post DJ, Franks J, Boyd K, Salomon R, Hoffmann E, Yen HL, Webby RJ, Walker D, Nguyen TD, Webster RG: Molecular changes in the polymerase genes (PA and PB1) associated with high pathogenicity of H5N1 influenza virus in mallard ducks. J Virol 2007, 81: 8515-8524. 10.1128/JVI.00435-07PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Marjuki H, Scholtissek C, Franks J, Negovetich NJ, Aldridge JR, Salomon R, Finkelstein D, Webster RG: Three amino acid changes in PB1-F2 of highly pathogenic H5N1 avian influenza virus affect pathogenicity in mallard ducks. Arch Virol 2010, 155: 925-934. 10.1007/s00705-010-0666-4PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Song J, Feng H, Xu J, Zhao D, Shi J, Li Y, Deng G, Jiang Y, Li X, Zhu P, Guan Y, Bu Z, Kawaoka Y, Chen H: The PA protein directly contributes to the virulence of H5N1 avian influenza viruses in domestic ducks. J Virol 2011, 85: 2180-2188. 10.1128/JVI.01975-10PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Snyder MH, Buckler-White AJ, London WT, Tierney EL, Murphy BR: The avian influenza virus nucleoprotein gene and a specific constellation of avian and human virus polymerase genes each specify attenuation of avian-human influenza A/Pintail/79 reassortant viruses for monkeys. J Virol 1987, 61: 2857-2863.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Salomon R, Franks J, Govorkova EA, Ilyushina NA, Yen HL, Hulse-Post DJ, Humberd J, Trichet M, Rehg JE, Webby RJ, Webster RG, Hoffmann E: The polymerase complex genes contribute to the high virulence of the human H5N1 influenza virus isolate A/Vietnam/1203/04. J Exp Med 2006, 203: 689-697. 10.1084/jem.20051938PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Rudneva IA, Timofeeva TA, Shilov AA, Kochergin-Nikitsky KS, Varich NL, Ilyushina NA, Gambaryan AS, Krylov PS, Kaverin NV: Effect of gene constellation and postreassortment amino acid change on the phenotypic features of H5 influenza virus reassortants. Arch Virol 2007, 152: 1139-1145. 10.1007/s00705-006-0931-8PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Maines TR, Chen LM, Belser JA, Van Hoeven N, Smith E, Donis RO, Tumpey TM, Katz JM: Multiple genes contribute to the virulent phenotype observed in ferrets of an H5N1 influenza virus isolated from Thailand in 2004. Virology 2011, 413: 226-230. 10.1016/j.virol.2011.02.005PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wasilenko JL, Lee CW, Sarmento L, Spackman E, Kapczynski DR, Suarez DL, Pantin-Jackwood MJ: NP, PB1, and PB2 viral genes contribute to altered replication of H5N1 avian influenza viruses in chickens. J Virol 2008, 82: 4544-4553. 10.1128/JVI.02642-07PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Tada T, Suzuki K, Sakurai Y, Kubo M, Okada H, Itoh T, Tsukamoto K: NP body domain and PB2 contribute to increased virulence of H5N1 highly pathogenic avian influenza viruses in chickens. J Virol 2011, 85: 1834-1846. 10.1128/JVI.01648-10PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gabriel G, Klingel K, Otte A, Thiele S, Hudjetz B, Arman-Kalcek G, Sauter M, Shmidt T, Rother F, Baumgarte S, Keiner B, Hartmann E, Bader M, Brownlee GG, Fodor E, Klenk HD: Differential use of importin-α isoforms governs cell tropism and host adaptation of influenza virus. Nat Commun 2011, 2: 156. 10.1038/ncomms1158PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sarmento L, Wasilenko J, Pantin-Jackwood M: The effects of NS gene exchange on the pathogenicity of H5N1 HPAI viruses in ducks. Avian Dis 2010,54(Suppl 1):532-537.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hale BG, Randall RE, Ortín J, Jackson D: The multifunctional NS1 protein of influenza A viruses. J Gen Virol 2008, 89: 2359-2376. 10.1099/vir.0.2008/004606-0PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Long JX, Peng DX, Liu YL, Wu YT, Liu XF: Virulence of H5N1 avian influenza virus enhanced by a 15-nucleotide deletion in the viral nonstructural gene. Virus Genes 2008, 36: 471-478. 10.1007/s11262-007-0187-8PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Barber MR, Aldridge JR Jr, Webster RG, Magor KE: Association of RIG-I with innate immunity of ducks to influenza. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2010, 107: 5913-5918. 10.1073/pnas.1001755107PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Pantin-Jackwood MJ, Suarez DL, Spackman E, Swayne DE: Age at infection affects the pathogenicity of Asian highly pathogenic avian influenza H5N1 viruses in ducks. Virus Res 2007, 130: 151-161. 10.1016/j.virusres.2007.06.006PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Yuen KY, Chan PK, Peiris M, Tsang DN, Que TL, Shortridge KF, Cheung PT, To WK, Ho ET, Sung R, Cheng AF: Clinical features and rapid viral diagnosis of human disease associated with avian influenza A H5N1 virus. Lancet 1998, 351: 467-471. 10.1016/S0140-6736(98)01182-9PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- To KF, Chan PK, Chan KF, Lee WK, Lam WY, Wong KF, Tang NL, Tsang DN, Sung RY, Buckley TA, Tam JS, Cheng AF: Pathology of fatal human infection associated with avian influenza A H5N1 virus. J Med Virol 2001, 63: 242-246. 10.1002/1096-9071(200103)63:3<242::AID-JMV1007>3.0.CO;2-NPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kajihara M, Matsuno K, Simulundu E, Muramatsu M, Noyori O, Manzoor R, Nakayama E, Igarashi M, Tomabechi D, Yoshida R, Okamatsu M, Sakoda Y, Ito K, Kida H, Takada A: An H5N1 highly pathogenic avian influenza virus that invaded Japan through waterfowl migration. Jpn J Vet Res 2011, 59: 89-100.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tsuda Y, Isoda N, Sakoda Y, Kida H: Factors responsible for plaque formation of A/duck/Siberia/272/1998 (H13N6) influenza virus on MDCK cells. Virus Res 2009, 140: 194-198. 10.1016/j.virusres.2008.12.005PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hoffmann E, Neumann G, Kawaoka Y, Hobom G, Webster RG: A DNA transfection system for generation of influenza A virus from eight plasmids. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2000, 97: 6108-6113. 10.1073/pnas.100133697PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Reed LJ, Muench H: A simple method of estimating 50 per cent end-points. Am J Hyg 1938, 27: 493-497.Google Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.