H9N2 avian influenza infection altered expression pattern of Sphiogosine-1-phosphate Receptor 1 in BALB/c mice
© Tong et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 4 July 2013
Accepted: 24 September 2013
Published: 30 September 2013
The pathological damage inflicted by virulent AIV strains is often caused by inducing a positive feedback loop of cytokines in immune cells that cause excessive inflammation. Previous research has shown that a G protein-coupled receptor, sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor 1 (S1PR1), plays a crucial role in the development of excessive inflammation in influenza virus infection (Cell 146:861–862, 2011; Cell 146:980–991, 2011). BALB/c mice are common laboratory animals used in research of influenza virus; however the effects of influenza infections on expression patterns of S1PR1 in mice are unknown.
We investigated the expression patterns of S1PR1 in normal BALB/c mice and those infected by two distinct H9N2 AIV strains, one (A/chicken/Guangdong/V/2008,V) highly pathogenic, and the other (A/chicken/Guangdong/Ts/2004,Ts), non-pathogenic in mice, using quantitative PCR and immunohistochemistry (IHC) to detect S1PR1 mRNA and protein, respectively.
S1PR1 mRNA was ubiquitously expressed in all the tissues examined, and significant differences were seen in mRNA expression between infected Ts, V and control mice in detected tissues, heart, liver, spleen, kidney and brain. S1PR1 protein was expressed in the cytoplasm and also demonstrated quantitative changes in expression in the various tissues between mice infected with the two strains of AIV.
Our results provided the first look at differences in S1PR1 expression patterns in BALB/c mice infected by non-pathogenic and highly pathogenic H9N2 influenza viruses. This information will not only be helpful in designing experiments to better understand the role of S1PR1 in virus-host interactions but also in developing novel anti-influenza agents to minimize the mortality and morbidity associated with highly virulent strains in avian and human populations.
KeywordsH9N2 BALB/c mice S1PR1 Expression pattern
The avian influenza virus (AIV) H9N2 subtype was first characterized in 1966 as causing mild respiratory diseases in turkeys  and, for the first decade after its isolation, was found only in shorebirds and mallards . However, after almost 50-years evolution and propagation, the H9N2 viruses have spread across most of the earth, circulating in wild bird and domestic poultry populations worldwide. Although AIV infections commonly result in low mortality in avian populations, in immunosuppressed chickens, recent isolates of H9N2 virus have been associated with high mortality in young chicks and a severe decline in egg production in laying chickens via secondary bacterial infections of the upper respiratory tract, resulted in significant economic losses of domestic poultry in many Asian countries [3–9]. In addition to the enormous financial losses, avian influenza virus (AIV) infections in bird populations with represent a repository of virulent genes or conservative gene fragments that can recombine to form new influenza A strains that can cross species boundaries, which increasingly are causing zoonotic infections in humans. One AIV subtype of increasing concern, H9N2, has spread across many countries with a broad range of host species, including humans, pigs and poultry [8–10]. For a longtime, H9N2 influenza virus was ignored because of its relatively low pathogenicity compared with H5N1. However, a recent zoonotic outbreak of H7N9 in China had resulted in many deaths, and the six internal genes (PA,NS,PB2,PB1,NP,M) of the new H7N9 strain come from H9N2 [11, 12]. Similar involvement also announced before that some H9N2 and H1N1 hybrid can replicate in a high titer in vitro and exhibit higher pathogenicity than both parental viruses [12, 13].
Sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor 1 (S1PR1) is one of the five sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). The S1PR1 signaling system exerts its influence on a wide range of physiologic processes via activation of several signaling pathways: JAK/STAT, mTOR/PI3K/Akt, Ras/ERK/MAPK, Phospholipase C activation of PKC/Ca2+ and cyclic AMP [14, 15]. Much research has been done on the role of on S1PR1 in cancer and neuroscience. S1PR1-STAT3 upregulation in tumor cells is critical for maintenance of persistent STAT3 signaling in cancer cells  and can result in premetastatic niche formation through activation of S1PR1-STAT3 and induced factors, enabling myeloid to invade and proliferate and apoptosis resistance at premetastic sites . Protein S protects the blood–brain barrier integrity via Tyro3 and S1PR1, illuminating potentially novel treatments for neurovascular dysfunction resulting from blood–brain barrier damage . However, until recently, little attention was given to the role of S1PR1 in immune response. In 2011, Teijaro, et al. used a S1P1 receptor subtype-selective agonist to suppress innate immune responses, resulting in suppression of cytokine and chemokine secretion and in significantly reduced mortality during infection of mice with a human pathogenic influenza H1N1 [19–21]. This indicated a crucial role of S1PR1 in influenza infection and suggested that S1PR1 signaling may be important in the immune response to other viral infections as well. The aim of the current study was to investigate the contribution of S1PR1 to infection with influenza virus by examining changes in the expression pattern of S1PR1, at the protein level and mRNA level, in normal (uninfected) mice compared to those infected with highly pathogenic and non-pathogenic H9N2 influenza. The results will contribute to get the function of S1PR1 in the infection of influenza virus and get the basic data for the strategies of anti-influenza.
Amplification of S1PR1and sequence analysis
mRNA expression of S1PR1 gene in BALB/c mice detected by Real-Time PCR
S1PR1 expression detected by immunohistochemistry
H9N2 subtype AIV has been circulating in domestic poultry worldwide after almost 50-years evolution and propagation. Though it is defined as a low pathogenic avian influenza itself, H9N2 has caused enormous losses of domestic poultry due to secondary infections, particularly in Asia and countries of the Middle East, H9N2 subtype AIV also represents a significant threat for novel zoonotic influenza viruses in humans via supplying virulent genes or conservative fragments to other influenza strains. Six of eight gene fragments of H7N9 influenza strains isolated in a recent outbreak of AIV in China were verified as being from H9N2 . Moreover, recent reports have shown that the domestic cats and dogs were also susceptible to H9N2 AIV infection [24, 25]; these species might pose an even bigger risk as a reservoir of zoonotic influenza virus due to their close proximity to humans in both developed and developing nations. Additionally, dogs may be able to transmit AIV strains between avian populations .
Inflammation is one of the common pathological features of viral infections, particularly in influenza infection, which is often characterized by excessive inflammation factors and cytokines, resulting in pathological damage of tissues and even fatalities in severe infections. Modulating inflammation during ongoing antiviral therapy to reduce resultant immunopathology is very likely to be beneficial and increase the chances to lower morbidity and mortality associated with some AIV strains . Since the S1PR1 was first discovered on endothelial cells, it has been found engaging in a wide range of pathophysiological activities via modulating S1P signaling. S1PR1, by binding with S1P, could induce endothelial cell migration, proliferation, survival, and morphogenesis [27, 28]. A precise S1P and S1PR1 signaling balance was found to be responsible for the cell growth and regulation of cell metabolism in mammals [29, 30]. In addition, S1PR1 has been shown to control lymphocyte exit and to be required for the egress of both B and T cells [31, 32]. However, an imbalance of S1P-S1PR1 system also participates in pathologic conditions such as cancer and inflammatory diseases [33, 34].
It is because of S1PR1’s pivotal role in modulating the cellular inflammatory response that many researchers shifted their focuses to its role in inflammatory signaling in recent years. It has been demonstrated that over expression of S1PR1 along with other 4 S1P receptors will maintain a basal value even 7 days after injury, suggesting that S1PR1 activation may be a short-term injury response . A recent investigation uncovered a novel function of S1PR1 as the critical regulator of efficient thrombopoiesis; mice lacking the S1P receptor S1PR1 developed severe thrombocytopenia, which suggests new therapeutic approaches for patients with this disease . The role of S1PR1 in influenza infection has also been preliminarily studied by John R. Teijaro, et al. who suppressed excessive innate immune responses through S1P1 signaling, resulting in reduced mortality during infection of mice with a human pathogenic strain of influenza virus [20, 21]. Hence, we hypothesized that S1PR1 might occupy a key position in influenza inflammation, protecting the host from excessive inflammatory symptoms caused by H9N2 infection, which we demonstrated in our previous reports [22, 23]. Based upon our previous findings, we hypothesized that S1PR1 expression might be altered in mice challenged with two AIV strains associated with strong and weak inflammatory and related to differences in their respective mortality rates .
We examined the gene expression profile of S1PR1 to elucidate its function in influenza infection in mice challenged with H9N2 strains associated with high (V) and low (TS) pathogenicity. We found that S1PR1 mRNA was expressed in all tissues of BALB/c mouse examined; this may be the site-specific role of different tissues in infection. When using different influenza virus strains infected the BALB/c mice, the S1PR1 gene expression level showed different variation trends, we speculated this may be related to the strains of influenza virus and need to be further research. There were discrepancies, however, between the mRNA and protein expression levels in some tissues. Inconsistencies between mRNA and protein levels can be caused by many factors: post-transcriptional control, lags in protein translation, deactivation of post-translational protein processing, shorter half-lives of mRNA than proteins in vivo, and regulation of excessive mRNA by host molecules such as miRNA. We found significant differences in the expression pattern of S1PR1 mRNA or protein, both between uninfected and influenza-infected BALB/c mice and between those infected with H9N2 influenza strains that are non-pathogenic and highly pathogenic in mice (TS and V strains, respectively). These differences were most evident in tissues of heart, liver, kidney, brain. This difference correlates well with our previous reports, which identified differences in pathology in these organs between BALB/c mice infected with TS and V stains infection. Inflammation was more apparent in BALB/c mice infected with A/chicken/Guangdong/V/2008 (VK627), and this was confirmed by detection of increased expression of inflammatory cytokines . Although our results confirm previous reports of the role of S1PR1 in pathology associated with infection with influenza, elucidation of the specific mechanism of S1PR1 in the inflammatory response to AIV infections requires further study.
In conclusion, our data showing the distribution tissue expression pattern of S1PR1 in AIV-infected mice further supports a crucial role for S1PR1 in the physiological and pathological processes in influenza. The tissue-specific alteration in the expression pattern of S1PR1 in mice infected with highly pathogenic AIV compared with mice challenged with non-pathogenic AIV suggests differences in immune response are very likely to be associated with S1PR1 signaling pathways. Further research on S1PR1 signaling may enhance research and development of anti-influenza drugs and provide new opportunities for prevention and treatment of other human viral diseases.
Materials and methods
Viruses and BALB/c mice infection by H9N2 influenza virus
The viruses used in study were H9N2 AIV A/chicken/Guangdong/TS/2004 (TSE627), or TS, and A/chicken/Guangdong/V/2008 (VK627), or V. We previously determined that V virus replicates efficiently in mouse brains and is highly pathogenic in mice while TS-infected mice exhibit no clinical symptoms, and TS virus is not detectable in the brains of TS-infected mice [22, 23]. Influenza viral titer was determined by plaque assay, as described in our previous study . A total of 24 six-week old female mice (Guangdong Experimental Animal Center, Guangzhou, China) were randomly divided into 3 groups: TS group (infected by intranasal inoculation with 104 PFU of TS influenza virus in 50 μl of sterile, endotoxin-free PBS); V group (infected intranasally with 104 PFU of V influenza virus in 50 μl of sterile, endotoxin-free PBS); and Control group (treated intranasally with 50 μl of PBS alone). Mice were surveilled for daily weight loss, as a measure of morbidity, as our previous reports [22, 23]. All animal experiments were conducted in a facility accredited by the Association for Assessment and Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care International and in accordance with the guidance of CDC’s Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee. Additionally, all animal experiments had been authorized by Guangdong Province Animal Disease Control Center.
All mice were anesthetized and euthanized at day 5 after inoculation. Tissues including heart, liver, spleen, lung, kidney, brain and stomach were harvested promptly. Each tissue was divided into two parts: one part was frozen in liquid nitrogen for 2 h then stored in -86°C until needed for RNA extraction; the other part was fixed in 10% neutralized buffered formalin for more than one week for immunohistochemistry.
Total RNA was extracted from 100 mg of frozen tissue from each organ using Trizol Reagent (Takara Biotech, Dalian, China), in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions. After being mixed with trichloromethane and centrifuged, the supernatant was transferred and mixed with isopropanol and ethanol. Precipitated RNA was dissolved in RNAse-free H2O then treated with RNase-free DNase I to remove possible contaminating DNA before storage at -86°C.
S1PR1 gene cloning
cDNA was generated from total RNA using reverse-transcriptase (Takara Biotech, Dalian, China), according to the manufacturer’s guidelines. Primers were synthesized as follows: 5’-TGCCTGGAGAAATACC-3’ (forward), 5’-TTCCCAGTGCATTGTT-3’ (reverse). The S1PR1 gene was amplified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in a 50 μl reaction volume with the following programmed conditions: Denaturation at 95°C for 5 min; 35 cycles (denaturation at 95°C for 30 s, annealing at 55°C for 40 s, and elongation at 72°C for 1 min); followed by a final elongation cycle at 72°C for 10 min. The cDNA produced by PCR were resolved by 1.5% agarose gel electrophoresis and visualized by ethidium bromide (EB) staining. Bands were purified by Gel Extraction Kit (Takara Biotech, Dalian, China). An aliquot of each purified PCR products were then cloned into pMD18-T vector (Takara Biotech, Dalian, China), and positive clones were sequenced by Takara Biotech company and were blast in pubmed.
Real time quantitative PCR
The remaining purified cDNAs generated from selected tissues by PCR were normalized to the expression levels of the endogenous β-actin housekeeping gene Quantitative real-time PCR was performed in a total 25 μl reaction volume containing 2 μl of total cDNA, 0.5 μl of forward and reverse primers (20 μM each), 22 μl SYBR® Premix Ex Taq™ reaction mixture (Takara Biotech, Dalian, China) using Bio-Rad iQ™5 Real-Time PCR Detection System (Applied Biosystems, Carlsbad, CA). The primers for S1PR1 gene fragment and β-actin are as follows: S1PR1: 5′-TGCCTGGAGAAATACC-3′ (forward), 5′-TTCCC AGTGCATTGTT-3′ (reverse), β-actin: 5′-CATCCGTAAAGACCTCTATGCCAAC-3′ (forward), 5′-ATGGAGCCACCGATCCACA-3′ (reverse). The reaction was carried out with the following programmed parameters: 35 cycles (95°C for 30 s, 55°C for 40 s, and 72°C for 30 s); followed by a final elongation cycle at 72°C for 10 min. All reactions were performed in triplicates. The relative expression level of S1PR1 gene was calculated by normalizing the levels of S1PR1 transcripts to that of β-actin transcripts using a relative standard curve method. The expression diversity of the S1PR1 gene was transformed using the 2-ΔΔCt formula and normalized with β-actin expression. The melting curves for each PCR were carefully analyzed to avoid nonspecific amplifications in PCR products. Data was analyzed using GraphPad Prism 5 (GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA). Independent sample (two-tailed) t-test and one way anove was used to determine statistical significance between samples. A p-value less than 0.05 (P < 0.05) was considered to be statistically significant, while a p-value less than 0.01 (P < 0.01) was considered to be highly significant.
Samples of formalin fixed tissues were trimmed, dehydrated, embedded in melted paraffin, sliced into 4 μm thick sections and finally mounted on silanized slides pre-treated with silicon. Endogenous peroxidase activities in tissue sections were inactivated in 3% H2O2 for 10 min at room temperature and washed 3 times by 0.02 M PBS (pH = 7.2) at 5 min intervals. Heat-induced epitope retrieval was performed by immersing tissue sections in 10 mM sodium citrate pH 6.0 at high pressure, 100°C for 10 min and then cooled naturally. After being washed 3 times in PBS for 5 min, sections were incubated with rabbit anti-S1PR1 polyclonal antibody (PROTEINTECH, USA), diluted 1:100, for 1.5 h at 37°C. Sections were again washed 3 times in PBS then incubated with HRP-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG antibody for 1 h at 37°C. S1PR1 was then visualized by DAB (3, 3’-diaminobenzidine-tetrahydrochloride) for 4 min according to the manufacturer’s guidelines (ZSGQ-BIO, China). Tissues were dyed using hematoxylin for 1 min, washed under running water for 10 min, dehydrated with histologic grade ethanol, vitrified by dimethylbenzene, and, finally, embedded in neutral balsam.
This work was supported by the National Science Foundation of China (No.81001375), Program for National Broiler Industry (nycytx-42-G3-03) and Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province (No.10251064201000004).
- Homme PJ, Easterday BC: Avian influenza virus infections I Characteristics of influenza A-turkey-Wisconsin-1966 virus. Avian Dis 1970, 14: 66-74. 10.2307/1588557PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kawaoka Y, Chambers TM, Sladen WL, Webster RG: Is the gene pool of influenza viruses in shorebirds and gulls different from that in wild ducks? Virol 1988, 163: 247-250. 10.1016/0042-6822(88)90260-7View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bano S, Naeem K, Malik SA: Evaluation of pathogenic potential of avian influenza virus serotype H9N2 in chickens. Avian Dis 2003, 47: 817-822. 10.1637/0005-2086-47.s3.817PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Aamir UB, Wernery U, Ilyushina N, Webster RG: Characterization of avian H9N2 influenza viruses from United Arab Emirates 2000 to 2003. Virol 2007, 361: 45-55. 10.1016/j.virol.2006.10.037View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Guo YJ, Krauss S, Senne DA, Mo IP, Lo KS, Xiong XP, Norwood M, Shortridge KF, Webster RG, Guan Y: Characterization of the pathogenicity of members of the newly established H9N2 influenza virus lineages in Asia. Virol 2000, 267: 279-288. 10.1006/viro.1999.0115View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kim JA, Cho SH, Kim HS, Seo SH: H9N2 influenza viruses isolated from poultry in Korean live bird markets continuously evolve and cause the severe clinical signs in layers. Vet Microbiol 2006, 118: 169-176. 10.1016/j.vetmic.2006.07.007PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Naeem K, Ullah A, Manvell RJ, Alexander DJ: Avian influenza A subtype H9N2 in poultry in Pakistan. Vet Rec 1999, 145: 560. 10.1136/vr.145.19.560PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Alexander DJ: A review of avian influenza in different bird species. Vet Microbiol 2000, 74: 3-13. 10.1016/S0378-1135(00)00160-7PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Post J, de Geus ED, Vervelde L, Cornelissen JB, Rebel J: Systemic distribution of different low pathogenic avian influenza (LPAI) viruses in chicken. Virol J 2013, 10: 23. 10.1186/1743-422X-10-23PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Peiris M, Yuen KY, Leung CW, Chan KH, Ip PL, Lai RW, Orr WK, Shortridge KF: Human infection with influenza H9N2. Lancet 1999, 354: 916-917. 10.1016/S0140-6736(99)03311-5PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gao R, Cao B, Hu Y, Feng Z, Wang D, Hu W, Chen J, Jie Z, Qiu H, Xu K, et al.: Human infection with a novel avian-origin influenza A (H7N9) virus. N Engl J Med 2013, 368: 1888-1897. 10.1056/NEJMoa1304459PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Van Ranst M, Lemey P: Genesis of avian-origin H7N9 influenza A viruses. Lancet 2013, 381: 1883-1885. 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60959-9PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sun Y, Qin K, Wang J, Pu J, Tang Q, Hu Y, Bi Y, Zhao X, Yang H, Shu Y, et al.: High genetic compatibility and increased pathogenicity of reassortants derived from avian H9N2 and pandemic H1N1/2009 influenza viruses. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2011, 108: 4164-4169. 10.1073/pnas.1019109108PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Rosen H, Gonzalez-Cabrera PJ, Sanna MG, Brown S: Sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor signaling. Annu Rev Biochem 2009, 78: 743-768. 10.1146/annurev.biochem.78.072407.103733PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Rivera J, Proia RL, Olivera A: The alliance of sphingosine-1-phosphate and its receptors in immunity. Nat Rev Immunol 2008, 8: 753-763. 10.1038/nri2400PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lee H, Deng J, Kujawski M, Yang C, Liu Y, Herrmann A, Kortylewski M, Horne D, Somlo G, Forman S, et al.: Stat3-induced S1PR1 expression is critical for persistent Stat3 activation in tumors. Nat Med 2010, 16: 1421-1428. 10.1038/nm.2250PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Deng J, Liu Y, Lee H, Herrmann A, Zhang W, Zhang C, Shen S, Priceman SJ, Kujawski M, Pal SK, et al.: S1PR1-STAT3 signaling is crucial for myeloid cell colonization at future metastatic sites. Cancer Cell 2012, 21: 642-654. 10.1016/j.ccr.2012.03.039PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zhu D, Wang Y, Singh I, Bell RD, Deane R, Zhong Z, Sagare A, Winkler EA, Zlokovic BV: Protein S controls hypoxic/ischemic blood–brain barrier disruption through the TAM receptor Tyro3 and sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor. Blood 2010, 115: 4963-4972. 10.1182/blood-2010-01-262386PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Iwasaki A, Medzhitov R: A new shield for a cytokine storm. Cell 2011, 146: 861-862. 10.1016/j.cell.2011.08.027PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Teijaro JR, Walsh KB, Cahalan S, Fremgen DM, Roberts E, Scott F, Martinborough E, Peach R, Oldstone MB, Rosen H: Endothelial cells are central orchestrators of cytokine amplification during influenza virus infection. Cell 2011, 146: 980-991. 10.1016/j.cell.2011.08.015PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Walsh KB, Teijaro JR, Rosen H, Oldstone MB: Quelling the storm: utilization of sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor signaling to ameliorate influenza virus-induced cytokine storm. Immunol Res 2011, 51: 15-25. 10.1007/s12026-011-8240-zPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Tian J, Qi W, Li X, He J, Jiao P, Zhang C, Liu GQ, Liao M: A single E627K mutation in the PB2 protein of H9N2 avian influenza virus increases virulence by inducing higher glucocorticoids (GCs) level. PLoS One 2012, 7: e38233. 10.1371/journal.pone.0038233PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Li X, Qi W, He J, Ning Z, Hu Y, Tian J, Jiao P, Xu C, Chen J, Richt J, et al.: Molecular basis of efficient replication and pathogenicity of H9N2 avian influenza viruses in mice. PLoS One 2012, 7: e40118. 10.1371/journal.pone.0040118PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zhang K, Zhang Z, Yu Z, Li L, Cheng K, Wang T, Huang G, Yang S, Zhao Y, Feng N, et al.: Domestic cats and dogs are susceptible to H9N2 avian influenza virus. Virus Res 2013, 175: 52-57. 10.1016/j.virusres.2013.04.004PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Amirsalehy H, Nili H, Mohammadi A: Can dogs carry the global pandemic candidate avian influenza virus H9N2? Aust Vet J 2012, 90: 341-345. 10.1111/j.1751-0813.2012.00973.xPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- de Jong MD, Simmons CP, Thanh TT, Hien VM, Smith GJ, Chau TN, Hoang DM, Chau NV, Khanh TH, Dong VC, et al.: Fatal outcome of human influenza A (H5N1) is associated with high viral load and hypercytokinemia. Nat Med 2006, 12: 1203-1207. 10.1038/nm1477PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Brinkmann V: Sphingosine 1-phosphate receptors in health and disease: mechanistic insights from gene deletion studies and reverse pharmacology. Pharmacol Ther 2007, 115: 84-105. 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2007.04.006PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lee MJ, Thangada S, Claffey KP, Ancellin N, Liu CH, Kluk M, Volpi M, Sha'afi RI, Hla T: Vascular endothelial cell adherens junction assembly and morphogenesis induced by sphingosine-1-phosphate. Cell 1999, 99: 301-312. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81661-XPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Pyne S, Pyne NJ: Sphingosine 1-phosphate signalling in mammalian cells. Biochem J 2000, 349: 385-402. 10.1042/0264-6021:3490385PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Spiegel S, Milstien S: Sphingosine 1-phosphate, a key cell signaling molecule. J Biol Chem 2002, 277: 25851-25854. 10.1074/jbc.R200007200PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Cyster JG: Chemokines, sphingosine-1-phosphate, and cell migration in secondary lymphoid organs. Annu Rev Immunol 2005, 23: 127-159. 10.1146/annurev.immunol.23.021704.115628PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Cyster JG, Schwab SR: Sphingosine-1- phosphate and lymphocyte egress from lymphoid organs. Annu Rev Immunol 2012, 30: 69-94. 10.1146/annurev-immunol-020711-075011PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sanchez T, Hla T: Structural and functional characteristics of S1P receptors. J Cell Biochem 2004, 92: 913-922. 10.1002/jcb.20127PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kitano M, Hla T, Sekiguchi M, Kawahito Y, Yoshimura R, Miyazawa K, Iwasaki T, Sano H, Saba JD, Tam YY: Sphingosine 1-phosphate/sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor 1 signaling in rheumatoid synovium: regulation of synovial proliferation and inflammatory gene expression. Arthritis Rheum 2006, 54: 742-753. 10.1002/art.21668PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wamhoff BR, Lynch KR, Macdonald TL, Owens GK: Sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor subtypes differentially regulate smooth muscle cell phenotype. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2008, 28: 1454-1461. 10.1161/ATVBAHA.107.159392PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zhang L, Orban M, Lorenz M, Barocke V, Braun D, Urtz N, Schulz C, von Brühl ML, Tirniceriu A, Gaertner F, et al.: A novel role of sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor S1pr1 in mouse thrombopoiesis. J Exp Med 2012, 209: 2165-2181. 10.1084/jem.20121090PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.