Open Access

An M2e-based synthetic peptide vaccine for influenza A virus confers heterosubtypic protection from lethal virus challenge

  • Ji-Hong Ma1,
  • Fu-Ru Yang1,
  • Hai Yu1,
  • Yan-Jun Zhou1,
  • Guo-Xin Li1,
  • Meng Huang1,
  • Feng Wen1 and
  • Guangzhi Tong1Email author
Contributed equally
Virology Journal201310:227

https://doi.org/10.1186/1743-422X-10-227

Received: 10 November 2012

Accepted: 4 July 2013

Published: 9 July 2013

Abstract

Background

Vaccination is considered as the most effective preventive method to control influenza. The hallmark of influenza virus is the remarkable variability of its major surface glycoproteins, HA and NA, which allows the virus to evade existing anti-influenza immunity in the target population. So it is necessary to develop a novel vaccine to control animal influenza virus. Also we know that the ectodomain of influenza matrix protein 2 (M2e) is highly conserved in animal influenza A viruses, so a vaccine based on the M2e could avoid several drawbacks of the traditional vaccines. In this study we designed a novel tetra-branched multiple antigenic peptide (MAP) based vaccine, which was constructed by fusing four copies of M2e to one copy of foreign T helper (Th) cell epitope, and then investigated its immune responses.

Results

Our results show that the M2e-MAP induced strong M2e-specific IgG antibody,which responses following 2 doses immunization in the presence of Freunds’ adjuvant. M2e-MAP vaccination limited viral replication substantially. Also it could attenuate histopathological damage in the lungs of challenged mice and counteracted weight loss. M2e-MAP-based vaccine protected immunized mice against the lethal challenge with PR8 virus.

Conclusions

Based on these findings, M2e-MAP-based vaccine seemed to provide useful information for the research of M2e-based influenza vaccine. Also it show huge potential to study vaccines for other similarly viruses.

Keywords

Influenza A virus Influenza M2e Synthetic peptide vaccine

Background

Influenza virus is a globally important respiratory pathogen which causes a high degree of morbidity and mortality in humans and animals annually [1]. Influenza virus typically infects 10~20% of the total worldwide population during seasonal epidemics, resulting in three to five million cases of severe illness and 250,000 to 500,000 deaths per year [2]. Moreover, novel influenza strains appear occasionally in the human population, causing pandemics. In 2009, the world confronted the first influenza pandemic of the 21st century, which iscaused by a novel influenza A H1N1 virus [3]. Antigenic and genetic analysis has suggested that this pandemic H1N1 virus is a product of reassortment between genes of the human, avian and swine influenza strains [4].

To date, vaccination is considered as the most effective preventive measure to control influenza. However, conventional vaccines have many drawbacks, the most important is the uncertainty of virus selection strains to be included in each year’s vaccine formulation [5]. The hallmark of influenza virus is the remarkable variability of its major surface glycoproteins, HA and NA, which allows the virus to evade existing anti-influenza immunity in the target population [6]. The potential shortage of pandemic influenza vaccines and the absence of specific-immunity in the human population make the development of a cross-protective influenza vaccine, which is based on conserved antigens, a promising prophylactic strategy. M2e, the ectodomain of the M2 protein, is highly conserved across influenza a subtypes and has become an attractive antigen target for producing a cross-protective influenza vaccine conferring broad spectrum prevention [79]. In contrast to BALB/c mice, Wolf AI, et al. show that immunization of other inbred and outbred mouse strains did not induce protective Abs. So it suggested that it correlated with a defect in T cell but not B cell responsiveness to the M2e-MAPs [10].

In this study we designed a novel tetra-branched multiple antigenic peptide (MAP) based vaccine, which was constructed by fusing four copies of M2e to one copy of foreign T helper (Th) cell epitope. The vaccine can provide heterosubtypic protection against lethal virus challenge.

Results

M2e-MAP immunization could induce high titers of M2e-specific IgG antibodies

To evaluate humoral immune responses induced by M2e-MAP, mice were vaccinated with 10 μg of M2e-MAP plus Freund’s adjuvant as described in Methods, and M2e-specific IgG antibodies were detected in mouse serum samples by ELISA. As shown in Figure 1, M2e-MAP induced strong M2e-specific IgG antibody responses, with the titer of 1:103 7 days post first immunization, then the titer reached of 1:104 before boost, and increased to the highest titer over 1:105 14 days post the boost immunization. In contrast, only background level of antibody responses was detected in the mice vaccine with Freund’s adjuvant alone.
Figure 1

M2e-specific antibody titers induced by M2e-MAP vaccine. Mice were vaccinated with M2e-MAP plus Freund adjuvant (s. c.). Mice receiving Freund were used as negative controls. Sera were collected at 1, 2, 3, 4 weeks post first immunization. The titers were expressed as the highest serum dilution which is greater than twice the average absorbance value at OD450 nm of pre-vaccination sera. The data are expressed as geometric mean titer (GMT) ± standard deviation (SD) of 10 mice per group. The lower limit detection (1:20) is indicated by a dotted line. Experiments were repeated three times.

M2e-MAP vaccination limited replication of virus and attenuated virus-induced lung pathology

Two weeks post boost immunization, mice were challenged with a lethal dose (10LD50) of PR8 and 106EID50 of SwGD96 and SwHLJ1. The vaccinated mice were sacrificed three days after challenge and lung tissues were collected for the detection of viral titers and histopathological examination. Viral titers were determined in SPF eggs and real time PCR methods [11]. In the control group, 3 different types of virus replicated to titers from 102.15 to 105.80 EID50/ml in lungs. In contrast, in SwHLJ1 and SwGD96 challenged group, virus cannot detect in lungs of mice immunized with M2e-MAP (<1.0 log10 EID50/ml) and the titer in lungs dropped to 103.60 EID50/ml in PR8 challenged mice(Table 1).Compared with the adjuvant control group, the average viral amounts in lungs of M2e-MAP-vaccinated mice was significantly lower (P < 0.001) after challenge with SwHLJ1, SwGD96 and PR8 viruses (Figure 2), which suggested that the M2e-MAP can induce potent protective immunity against viral replication following infection with different types of influenza A virus.
Table 1

Virus isolation and titrations in lungs on day 3 post challenge

Immunogena

Virus isolation/total

Protection against challenge and virus titerb

(log10 EID50/ml±S.D.)

 

PR8

SwGD96

SwHLJ1

PR8

SwGD96

SwHLJ1

M2e-MAP+Freund

5/5

0/5

0/5

3.60±0.22

<1

<1

Freund

5/5

5/5

5/5

5.80±0.27

3.26±0.29

2.15±0.34

a. 60 mice per group were injected twice subcutaneously with M2e-MAP plus Freund and Freund as control.

b. Mice were challenged intranasally 2 weeks post 1st boost with 106EID50 of SwGD96, SwHLJ1 and 10LD50 of PR8 viruses. Virus titer of lungs was determined 3 days later in ECE. The values were calculated by the method of Reed-Muench and expressed as the mean log10 EID50/ml±S.D. The lower limit of detection of virus was 1.0 log10 EID50/ml.

Figure 2

Viral amounts in lungs on day 3 post challenge. 5 mice of every challenge group were euthanized 3 days post-challenge and the viral amounts of lungs were determined by real time PCR. The values were expressed as the mean log10 viral copies/μL ±S.D of 5 mice per challenge group. *means in PR8 challenged group P < 0.001 compared to the Freund’s adjuvant control; **means in SwGD96 challenged group P < 0.001 compared to the Freund adjuvant control; ***indicates in SwHLJ1 challenged group P < 0.001 compared to the Freund adjuvant control.

Histopathologic examination showed that PR8 challenged mice, adjuvant control group revealed dramatic histopathological damages including large inflammatory cell infiltration, lung tissue necrosis, abscess formation and accompanied by bleeding, and some lungs tissue showed compensatory emphysema (Figure 3D). In contrast, the M2e-MAP-vaccinated mice lungs exhibited relatively minor pathological changes, with only slight expansion of alveoli, and the interval of alveolar became slightly flat because of pressure (Figure 3A). The vaccine also protected mice against infection by SwHLJ1 and SwGD96 virus, the M2e-MAP-vaccinated mice showed no obvious pathological damage (Figure 3B and C). On the contrary, the adjuvant control mice appeared interstitial pneumonia, alveolar capillaries and small blood vessel wall dilatation and congestion, accompanied by a small amount of bleeding (Figure 3E and F). The above data suggested that M2e-MAP vaccination may protect the mice against challenge of SwHLJ1, SwGD96 and PR8 virus through a combination of limiting viral replication in the lungs and attenuating virus-induced lung pathology.
Figure 3

Histopathological changes in the lungs of virus challenged mice. Immunized mice were challenged by PR8 (A and D), SwGD96 (B and E) and SwHLJ1(C and F) and lungs were collected for histopathological analysis 3 days post challenge (HE stain; bar = 50 um).The figure indicates the representative imagines of histopathological observations of M2e-MAP plus Freund immunized mice or Freund only.

M2e-MAP vaccination provided effective protection from lethal challenge with PR8 virus

To further confirm the protective immunity of M2e-MAP vaccination against lethal infection, mice received lethal challenge (10LD50) of A/Puerto Rico/8/34(PR8; H1N1) strain were monitored for weight loss and death for the subsequent two weeks postchallenge. As shown in Figure 4B, mice vaccinated with M2e-MAP in Freund’s adjuvant rallied from body weight loss eight days after virus infection. In contrast, body weight of the mice in the adjuvant control group dramatically decreased, almost 30%, in some cases. All mice received adjuvant alone died within 9 days after lethal virus challenge. In comparison, 100% of the mice survived in the groups vaccinated with M2e-MAP, with the survival rate significantly different from the matched adjuvant control (P < 0.001) (Figure 4A). These data illustrated that M2e-MAP could afford protection against lethal challenge of PR8 virus.
Figure 4

Survival curve and body weight in PR8 challenged mice. Survival curve and body weight in PR8 challenged mice. Mice were challenged with 10LD50 of PR8 virus intranasally and monitored daily for 2 weeks post challenge. A. Survival rate. The significant different (P<0.0001) of M2e-MAP+Freund versus Freund alone is indicated as *. B. Percentage (%) of mouse body weight. Each point represents mean of 10 mice per group.

Discussion

The considerable antigenic variation in influenza A virus and other virus such as FMDV and HIV presents problems in their control by vaccination [12]. In previous researches anti-M2e Abs induced by M2e-MAPs shows highly cross-reactive and can mediate protection to various viruses [10]. In the case of influenza A virus, an attractive alternative approach would be to develop a cross-protective influenza vaccine based on conserved antigens such as M2e. Several studies have shown that immunization with M2e can protect against influenza A virus infection [13]. Different results and conclusions from previous studies may be due to the difference of carrier proteins, adjuvant or routes of administration. The vaccine described in the present study has several advantages. The researchers showed that branched MAP based vaccine is better than single peptide based vaccine, and results also demonstrated that MAP-based vaccine could give high-titer antibody responses [8]. And vaccines with T-helper epitope can induce an antibody response [14]. So we have designed the vaccine by fusing four copies of M2e to one copy of foreign T helper (Th) cell epitope.

In this study, virus titers were determined by two methods, the first one is the traditional way by SPF eggs, and the second method was real time PCR which was showed previously [11]. Bothexperiments showed that the M2e-MAP could induce strong M2e-specific IgG antibody, which responses following 2 doses immunization in the presence of Freund and limited viral replication. Also it could attenuate histopathological damage in the challenged mice lungs and was able to counteract weight loss and protect mice from lethal challenge with PR8 virus. Therefore, the induction of M2e-specific antibody responses was necessary for M2e-based vaccines in the prevention of these three virus infection.

Several distinct M2-based vaccine constructs have been developed and found that they could induce significant resistance to influenza type A virus replication in mice [1519]. We routinely used a fairly severe viral challenge to evaluate the efficacy of the M2e-based vaccination. It may be noted that the challenge conditions used by various viruses to score protection after vaccination with an M2e-based vaccine vary widely [2022]. In this study high titers M2e-specific antibody responses could be induced following immunization of M2e-MAP plus Freunds’ adjuvant. Using three virus strains to challenge the immuned mice and got good results. After challenged by PR8 virus, a highly lethal virus, it demonstrated a clear-cut protection against mortality. The rest two mild virulence virus strains did not allow to score for survival, but the protection was assayed by reduction of virus titer in lungs homogenates. So we can know that the M2e-MAP play important role in the development of the vaccine.

In conclusion, we designed a novel tetra-branched multiple antigenic peptide (MAP) based vaccine, which was constructed by fusing four copies of M2e to one copy of foreign T helper (Th) cell epitope. This study provided useful information for the further development of M2e-based influenza vaccine.

Materials and methods

Virus and peptide

A/Swine/Heilongjiang/1/05(SwHLJ1; H3N2), A/Swine/Guangdong/96/06(SwGD96; H1N1)were isolated from China [23, 24]. A/Puerto Rico/8/34(PR8; H1N1) is a mouse-adapted virus. Viruses were grown in allantoic fluids of 10-day-old SPF embryonated chicken eggs at 37°C for 3 days. Virus were harvested and stored in aliquots at −80°C. The 50% lethal dose (LD50) of PR8 was determined in mice after serial dilutions of the virus stock and the result was calculated by Reed Muenchmethod [25]. The tetra-branched M2e-MAP was constructed by fusing four copies of a universal sequence which is an extracellular part of M2 protein with one copy of promiscuous T helper (Th) cell epitope [26] by a lysine tree with two additional Lys residues defining a putative cleavage site for cathepsin D [27]. Then it was synthesized by Genscript Co., Ltd (China). The synthesized peptide was prepared at 10 mg/mL in distilled water and stored at −20°C.The structure of M2e-MAP is shown in Figure 5.
Figure 5

Structure of the synthetic M2e-MAP. The M2e-MAP was synthesized on [Fmoc-Lys (Fmoc)] 2-Lys-Cys (Acm)-βAla-Wang Resin in a tetra-branched form, which carries four copies of M2e, those four copies of M2e were fused to one copy of foreign T helper (Th) cell epitope.

Immunization and virus challenge

Six to eight weeks old female SPF BALB/c mice were purchased from the Sino-British SIPPR/BK Animal Co., Ltd (Shanghai, China) and were immunized subcutaneously (s. c.) with M2e-MAP (10μg per mouse) plus Freund’s complete adjuvant (FCA, sigma) at a final volume of 100 μL and boosted with the same amount of immuogen in Freund’s incomplete adjuvant (FIA, Sigma) at a 2-week intervals. Mice injected with Freund’s adjuvant alone were used as negative control. Mice sera were collected at 0,1,2,3 and 4 weeks post first immunization to detect specific antibody responses.

Two weeks after boost, mice were anesthetized and challenged intranasally (i.n.) with a lethal dose (10LD50) of PR8 and 106EID50 of SwGD96 and SwHLJ1. Challenged mice were observed for illness or death and weighed daily for 2 weeks. Lung tissues were collected from euthanized mice on day 3 post-challenge for further virological tests and histopathological analysis.

Antibody detection

The M2e-specific antibody titers were determined by endpoint ELISA. Briefly, 96-well microtitre plates (Costar) were coated with peptide (0.5 μg per well) in 0.1 M carbonate buffer (pH 9.6) overnight at 4°C. After blocking with 5% skim milk in PBS for 2 h, serial diluted mice sera samples were added and incubated for 1 h at 37°C. Washing the ELISA plate, andhorseradish peroxidase (HRP)-labeled goat anti-rabbit IgG (1:10,000 dilution, Beijing Zhongshan Biotechnology) was added and incubated for 1 h at 37°C. Assay was developed using 3, 3′, 5, 5′-tetramethylbenzidine (TMB) (Amresco), and the reaction was stopped by adding 2 M H2SO4. The absorbance at 450 nm was measured by microplate autoreader (BioTek Instruments). The reciprocal of the highest dilution of the serum that is greater than twice average absorbance value of pre-vaccination serum was designated as the antibody titer.

Virus titers in lung

Lung tissues from euthanized mice were aseptically removed and homogenized in 1 ml of cold PBS. The homogenates were frozen at −80°C and later thawed for ease of handing. Solid debris was pelleted by centrifugation. Serial diluted from initial dilutions of 1:10 and then titrated for virus infectivity in 10-day-old SPF ECE. Virus titers were calculated by the Reed-Muench method and expressed as mean log10EID50 per milliliter ± standard deviation (SD).

In addition, lung tissues were also collected and tested by real-time RT-PCR assay recommended by WHO with some modifications as described [11]. Lung tissues were homogenized in 300 μL of cold PBS and viral RNA were extracted by RNeasy Plus Mini kit (QIAGEN). Then reverse transcription were performed and viral amounts in lungs were determined by real-time PCR using the InfA primers and TaqMan probe. The specific primers and labeled fluorogenic-probe were as follows: InfA-F:5-GACCGATCCTGTCACCTCTGAC-3; InfA-R:5-AGGGCATTCTGGACAAAGCGTCTA-3; TaqMan probe:5-FAM-TGCAGTCCTCGCTCACTGGGCACG-BHQ-3.

Histopathological analysis

The lung tissues of challenged mice were removed and immediately fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin, and then embedded in paraffin wax. Sections were made at 4–6 μm thickness and mounted on slides. Histopathological changes were examined by H & E staining and observed under light microscopy.

Statistical analysis

The survival curves were calculated by Kaplan-Meier method and the significance were analyzed with log-rank test. Other data were analyzed by two-tailed Student’s t test. P < 0.0001 was considered significantly different. All analysis were performed by Graphpad Prism software.

Ethical approval

In this study, all of the slaughter experiments were conducted in accordance with the guidelines of Shanghai Veterinary Research Institute, Shanghai, china (permit number SYXK 2011–0116). All animal procedures were approved by the Animal committee of Shanghai Veterinary Research Institute.

Notes

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The study was supported by grants from NSFC-Guangdong Joint Foundation (U0931003), the Ministry of Agriculture of China (No. 2009ZX08010-022B), International Sci & Tech Cooperation Program (2010DFB33920) and the Excellent Scientist Program of Shanghai (09XD1405400).

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Division of Swine Infectious Diseases, Shanghai Veterinary Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences

References

  1. Cox RJ, Brokstad KA, Ogra P: Influenza Virus: Immunity and Vaccination Strategies. Comparison of the Immune Response to Inactivated and Live, Attenuated Influenza Vaccines. Scand J Immunol 2004, 59: 1365-3083.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. De Filette M, Willy MJ, Birkett A, Lyons K, Schultz B, Tonkyro A, Resch S, Fiers W: Universal influenza A vaccine: Optimization of M2-based constructs. Virology 2005, 337: 149-161. 10.1016/j.virol.2005.04.004PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Neumann : Emergence and pandemic potential of swine-origin H1N1 influenza virus. Nature 2009, 459: 931-939. 10.1038/nature08157PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Garten RJ, Davis CT, Russell CA, Shu B, Lindstrom S, Balish A, Sessions WM, Xu X, Skepner E, Deyde V, et al.: Antigenic and genetic characteristics of swine-origin 2009 A(H1N1) influenza viruses circulating in humans. Science 2009,2009(325):197-201.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Webster RG, Bean WJ, Gorman OT, Chambers TM, Kawaoka Y: Evolution and ecology of influenza A viruses. Microbiol Rev 1992, 56: 152-179.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Verhoeyen M, et al.: Antigenic drift between the haemagglutinin of the Hong Kong influenza strains A/Aichi/2/68 and A/Victoria/3/75. Nature 1980, 286: 771-776. 10.1038/286771a0PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Posnett DN, McGrath H, Tam JP: A novel method for producing anti-peptide antibodies. Production of site-specific antibodies to the T cell antigen receptor beta-chain. J Biol Chem 1988, 263: 1719-1725.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Tam JP: Synthetic peptide vaccine design: synthesis and properties of a high-density multiple antigenic peptide system. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1988, 85: 5409-5413. 10.1073/pnas.85.15.5409PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Zharikova D, Mozdzanowska K, Feng J, Zhang M, Gerhard W: Influenza type A virus escape mutants emerge in vivo in the presence of antibodies to the ectodomain of matrix protein 2. J Virol 2005, 79: 6644-6654. 10.1128/JVI.79.11.6644-6654.2005PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Wolf AI, Mozdzanowska K, Williams KL, Singer D, Richter M, et al.: Vaccination with M2e-Based Multiple Antigenic Peptides: Characterization of the B Cell Response and Protection Efficacy in Inbred and Outbred Mice. PLoS One 2011,6(12):e28445. 10.1371/journal.pone.0028445PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Ma JH, Yu H, Zhou YJ, Li GX, Yan LP, Zhang SR, Wang B, Tong GZ: Design and validation of real-time Taqman fluorescence quantitative RT-PCR assay for rapid detection of type A influenza virus. Chinese journal of animal infect diseases 2010, 18: 1-7.Google Scholar
  12. Kilbourne ED: Influenza pandemics of the 20th century. Emerg Infect Dis 2006, 12: 9-14. 10.3201/eid1201.051254PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Slepushkin VA, Katz JM, Black RA, Gamble WC, Rota PA, Cox NJ: Protection of mice against influenza A virus challenge by vaccination with baculovirus-expressed M2 protein. Vaccine 1995, 13: 1399-1402. 10.1016/0264-410X(95)92777-YPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Rodriguez LL, et al.: A synthetic peptide containing the consensus sequence of the G-H loop region of foot-and-mouth disease virus type-O VP1 and a promiscuous T-helper epitope induces peptide-specific antibodies but fails to protect cattle against viral challenge. Vaccine 2003, 21: 3751-3756. 10.1016/S0264-410X(03)00364-5PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Natalie P, Peter P: Toward a Universal Influenza Virus Vaccine: Prospects and Challenges. Annual Review of Medicine 2013, 64: 189-202. 10.1146/annurev-med-120611-145115View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Frace AM, Klimov AI, Rowe T, Black RA, Katz JM: Modified M2 proteins produce heterotypic immunity against influenza A virus. Vaccine 1999, 17: 2237-2244. 10.1016/S0264-410X(99)00005-5PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Neirynck S, Deroo T, Saelens X, Vanlandschoot P, MinJou W, Fiers W: A universal influenza A vaccine based on the extracellular domain of the M2 protein Nat. Med. 1999, 5: 1157-1163.Google Scholar
  18. Okuda K, Ihata A, Watabe S, et al.: Protective immunity against influenza A virus induced by immunization with DNA plasmid containing influenza M gene. Vaccine 2001, 19: 3681-3691. 10.1016/S0264-410X(01)00078-0PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Krystyna M, JinQi F, Mark E, Goran K, Mare C, Laszlo O Jr: Walter Gerhard Induction of influenza type A virus-specific resistance by immunization of mice with a synthetic multiple antigenic peptide vaccine that contains ectodomains of matrix protein 2. Vaccine 2003, 21: 2616-2626. 10.1016/S0264-410X(03)00040-9View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Ciampor F, Thompson CA, Grambas S, Hay AJ: Regulation of pH by the M2 protein of influenza A viruses. Virus Res 1992, 22: 247-258. 10.1016/0168-1702(92)90056-FPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Grambas S, Hay AJ: Maturation of influenza A virus hemagglutinin: estimates of the pH encountered during transport and its regulation by the M2 protein. Virology 1992, 190: 11-18. 10.1016/0042-6822(92)91187-YPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Mozdzanowska K, Feng J, Eid M, Kragol G, Cudic M, Otvos L Jr, Gerhard W: Induction of influenza type A virus-specific resistance by immunization of mice with a synthetic multiple antigenic peptide vaccine that contains ectodomains of matrix protein 2. Vaccine 2003, 21: 2616-2626. 10.1016/S0264-410X(03)00040-9PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Yu H, Hua RH, Zhang Q, Liu TQ, Liu HL, Li GX, Tong GZ: Genetic evolution of swine influenza A (H3N2) viruses in China from 1970 to 2006. J Clin Microbiol 2008, 46: 1067-1075. 10.1128/JCM.01257-07PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Yu H, Zhang PC, Zhou YJ, Li GX, Pan J, Yan LP, Shi XX, Liu HL, Tong GZ: Isolation and genetic characterization of avian-like H1N1 and novel ressortant H1N2 influenza viruses from pigs in China. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2009, 386: 278-283. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2009.05.056PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Lu X, Tumpey TM, Morken T, Zaki SR, Cox NJ, Katz JM: A mouse model for the evaluation of pathogenesis and immunity to influenza A (H5N1) viruses isolated from humans. J Virol 1999, 73: 5903-5911.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  26. Wang CY, Chang TY, Walfield AM, Ye J, Shen M, Chen SP, Li MC, Lin YL, Jong MH, Yang PC, Chyr N, Kramer E, Brown F: Effective synthetic peptide vaccine for foot-and-mouth disease in swine. Vaccine 2002, 20: 2603-2610. 10.1016/S0264-410X(02)00148-2PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Cubillos C, de la Torre BG, Jakab A, Clementi G, Borras E, Barcena J, Andreu D, Sobrino F, Blanco E: Enhanced mucosal immunoglobulin A response and solid protection against foot-and-mouth disease virus challenge induced by a novel dendrimeric peptide. J Virol 2008, 82: 7223-7230. 10.1128/JVI.00401-08PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Ma et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement