Skip to main content

Evidence of association between hepatitis C virus genotype 2b and nosocomial transmissions in hemodialysis centers from southern Brazil



Hepatitis C virus infection is a serious public health problem. Hemodialysis is considered one of the main risk factors of HCV infection, due to several invasive medical procedures and potential nosocomial transmission that patients with chronic renal failure (CRF) are continuously submitted. The aims of this study were to determine the prevalence of HCV and its genotypes in patients with CRF in hemodialysis units in southern Brazil.


Demographic data and risk factors for HCV transmission were collected and analyzed. These data were obtained from patients undergoing hemodialysis treatment from January 2009 to August 2010, on two dialysis units of Rio Grande, southern Brazil. Genotyping was carried out by sequencing analysis of HCV NS5b, core-E1 junction and 5′UTR genomic regions.


One hundred fifty-nine patients under regular hemodialysis treatment were studied. HCV prevalence was 23.3%. HCV-infected patients had been on dialysis treatment for 91.9 months, a more prolonged period compared to HCV-negative patients (p = 0.001). While HCV genotypes 1b and 3a were identified as the most frequent strains, a surprisingly high proportion of genotype 2b was observed among patients in one of the dialysis centers compared to the general HCV-infected population of the same area. Hemodialysis treatment exposure time and healthcare working were associated with HCV infection.


Besides the efforts to minimize nosocomial transmission of HCV, some events of transmission are still evidenced in dialysis units.


Approximately 170 million people worldwide are infected with the hepatitis C virus (HCV) and are at risk of developing chronic hepatitis, cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma [1, 2]. Moreover, HCV infection is the most common indication for liver transplantation in developed countries [3].

Brazil has an intermediate prevalence of hepatitis C, varying from 2.5% to 10% [4]. Recently, a nationwide and comprehensive cross-sectional, population-based survey has reported an HCV seropositivity rate of 1.38% [5]. Nevertheless, in the southern region of the country, anti-HCV positive confirmed cases are higher than the national average (9.4 versus 5.4 per 100,000 subjects in 2011, respectively) [6].

Hemodialysis is considered one of the major risk factors for HCV infection, due to numerous vascular access procedures, periodic blood transfusions and potential nosocomial transmission to which patients with chronic renal failure (CRF) are continuously subjected [1, 7]. In spite of effective control and safe medical practices implemented to reduce the risk for transmission of infectious diseases among hemodialysis patients, sporadic outbreaks in dialysis units still occur. The major procedures to prevent HCV nosocomial transmission include protocols for handling bodily fluids, isolation policies and use of erythropoietin to minimize blood transfusions [7, 8]. Some factors, such as blood transfusions and duration of hemodialysis treatment, have been particularly related to a higher mortality rate among those patients [913].

HCV infection varies by patient characteristics, geographic location, socioeconomic aspects, number of patients per dialyzer and rigorous use of the strictest biosafety standards [14, 15]. Differences in patient behavior and community exposure factors may also contribute to the higher prevalence of HCV in hemodialysis units [15]. HCV prevalence among Brazilian hemodialysis patients ranges from 11% to 90% but HCV genotype characterization is not well documented [1621]. HCV genotype 1a is the most prevalent, followed by 1b and 3a [2125], except for the study by Busek and colleagues [20] who found genotype 2b as the second most prevalent.

Chronic renal patients have particular features that impair HCV diagnostics. Slight increases in aminotransferases levels, intermittent viremia and negative anti-HCV serology for a long period after infection are characteristics commonly observed in this population [7, 19]. HCV RNA detection by RT-PCR is the best method to diagnose HCV infection in patients with CRF [26, 27], despite the intermittent viremia described in 33% to 67% of anti-HCV positive patients [7].

The aims of this study were to determine the prevalence of HCV and its genotypes in patients with CRF in two hemodialysis centers of Rio Grande, southern Brazil, and the main risk factors associated with infection in this patient group.


The population analyzed comprised 57.2% of males, the mean age was 56.9 years (SD ± 15.9), and 65.4% were Caucasians. With respect to education, 66.7% were illiterate or had not completed elementary school. The main reported risk behaviors for HCV were blood transfusion (94.3%) and surgical procedures (90%). Approximately 2% of the patients reported hemophilia, 2% were intravenous drugs users (IDU), 3% shared syringes or needles and 2% informed use of inhaled cocaine.

HCV prevalence in the analyzed dialysis units was 23.3% (37/159). The mean age among HCV positive patients was 54.9 years (SD ± 13.3) and 62.2% were male. The statistical model for HCV infection was adjusted for age. Table 1 shows the crude and adjusted PRs for HCV infection according to HCV risk factors. As observed, the multivariate analysis revealed a significant PR for healthcare workers of 4.26 (p = 0.048).

Table 1 Crude (cPR) and adjusted (aPR) prevalence ratios for HCV infection according to risk factors (n = 159)

The average time of hemodialysis among all patients enrolled in this study was 55.1 months (SD ± 58). By contrast, HCV-positive patients had been on dialysis treatment for 92 months (SD ± 82), a time period significantly higher if compared to HCV-negative patients (44 ± 43 months; p = 0.001). In the multivariate analysis depicted in Table 1, this variable also showed borderline significance (p = 0.09) as independently associated with HCV infection. Whereas pre- and post-dialysis urea, potassium, calcium and phosphorus levels did not differ between HCV-negative and positive patients (data not shown), mean serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) was significantly higher among infected patients (17.1 versus 27.6 IU/L; p = 0.003), an expected finding.

All serological results were confirmed by HCV RNA detection followed by PCR of NS5b or 5′UTR (Table 2). HCV genotyping was carried out in 31 (84%) of the infected patients, based on phylogenetic analysis of NS5b sequences. In six cases, HCV subtyping was not possible due to negative PCR results for this viral genomic region. These comprised four genotype 1 strains, one genotype 2 and one genotype 3. Overall, 33 5′UTR and 31 NS5b sequences were determined. For isolates for which both NS5b and 5′UTR sequences were available, both regions revealed the same genotype in all cases. According to the analysis of NS5b region, 14 belonged to genotype 1; four were subtype 1a (13%) and 10 were subtype 1b (32.5%). All genotype 2 isolates (n = 7) belonged to subtype 2b, with a prevalence of 22%. HCV genotype 3 (subtype 3a), was also present in 10 subjects (32.5%). All genotypic classifications were further confirmed by HCV 5′UTR sequencing (data not shown). A single additional genotype 2b isolated was found in Unit 1, for which only the 5′UTR genomic region was available. Figure 1A depicts all HCV NS5b fragments phylogenetically analyzed. It is evident from the tree that all genotype 2b isolates characterized in this work (all from Unit 2) clustered together, although only a fairly significant bootstrap value was achieved (70%). This cluster is not observed for the remaining genotypes found (Figure 1A), for which the sequences are interleaved with database reference sequences. However, some subtype 1a and 1b sequences are strongly similar in the analyses, and a common source of transmission in those cases cannot be completely ruled out.

Table 2 HCV subtype distribution in patients under hemodialysis according to phyogenetic analysis of the 5′UTR and NS5b genomic regions
Figure 1

Phylogenetic tree depicting the HCV NS5b ( A ) or the core-E1 junction ( B ) genomic region of the analyzed isolates. HCV isolates characterized in the study are highlighted with symbols (circle, subtype 1b; square, subtype 1a; diamonds, subtype 2b; triangles, subtype 3a). Only bootstrap support values above 80% are shown, which differentiate major HCV genotypes and subtypes. The tree was rooted with a subtype 7a sequence, a variant not found in Brazil. Bars below the trees represents a genetic distance of 5% at the nucleotide level.

In order to corroborate the existence of a transmission cluster harboring the HCV subtype 2b sequences in Unit 2, phylogenetic analysis of another HCV genomic region (the core-E1 boundary) was carried out. A semi-nested PCR of that region was attempted for five out of the seven HCV-2b viruses observed in Unit 1, and of those four E1 sequences were generated. As shown in Figure 1B, the four sequences still clustered together with a bootstrap value of 80%, further highlighting the transmission cluster seen with NS5b sequences.


This is the first study characterizing the prevalence of HCV genotypes among patients undergoing hemodialysis treatment in southern Brazil. A higher prevalence of genotype 2b has been found, a genotype with rare occurrence in Brazil, what suggests a possible nosocomial transmission event in one of the two hemodialysis units studied herein. Nosocomial transmission is still a common event in dialysis units, and the proper detection of HCV infection among these patients remains a challenge.

The HCV infection prevalence found in this study (23.3%) was higher compared to previous studies in general population at the same region, which reports prevalence of 6% to 8.6% [28]. On the other hand, when studies conducted with patients on hemodialysis are considered, HCV prevalence of 14.6% to 46.7% have been reported in different Brazilian cities [16, 17, 19, 20]. This discrepancy largely highlights HCV as a major morbidity in hemodialysis units, jeopardizing the safety of patients with CRF.

In this study, hemodialysis treatment time and healthcare occupation were significantly associated with HCV infection, the majority of them occurring in older adults and men. Meyers and colleagues [29] have also found association of HCV infection with time of hemodialysis treatment.

Several geographic and ethnic differences in the prevalence of HCV genotypes, as well as temporal, behavioral and cultural differences, have been reported [30, 31]. While in Brazil HCV genotypes 1 and 3 are predominant, in some Latin American countries, like Argentina and Venezuela, genotypes 1 and 2 prevail, responding for approximately 90% of the cases [32]. In Europe, a continuous decrease of genotype 3 is observed, and an increase of genotype 2 has been registered [33, 34]. The HCV genotype distribution in this study was similar to those reported by other authors for the same geographic region, with HCV genotypes 1 and 3 being responsible for most infections [3537]. Genotype 3a has been reported as particularly common in southern Brazil [36, 38]. Noteworthy, however, is the high prevalence of genotype 2b among the patients treated in the hemodialysis units enrolled here, especially from one of the units studied. This is a unique characteristic, considering the low prevalence of this genotype in Brazil [15, 21, 33, 39, 40]. These findings suggest a potential role of nosocomial transmission among the patients involved.

Hepatitis C is the most common cause of chronic viral liver disease in haemodialysis patients [17]. Several risk factors for HCV acquisition have been identified among these patients, including surgery and frequent blood transfusions they are submitted to. Furthermore, nosocomial transmission in the dialysis units may be associated with hemodialysis procedures, such as aerosol formation during fistula cannulation for vein access, accidents with contaminated blood and direct contact with contaminated materials used by infected patients [41].

Our hypothesis of nosocomial transmission of HCV genotype 2 is also supported by the phylogenetic analysis of the characterized isolates. All subtype 2b sequences clustered together for two distinct HCV genomic regions analyzed, suggesting a common source of infection. This feature was not seen for the other genotypes studied, where database reference sequences intermingled with query sequences, except for a few potential transmission links within the subtype clades. On the other hand, it is likely that subtype 2b circulates in Brazil as a monophyletic lineage, based on recent nationwide HCV sequence analyses (Lampe et al., Antivir Ther in press). Therefore, we cannot exclude the possibility that the subtype 2b cluster seen here reflects such single introduction of this subtype in the country, rather than a bonafide intra-unit dissemination. However, epidemiological data regarding the frequency of this subtype in Brazil largely argues in favor of the nosocomial transmission hypothesis. Yet this is the likely scenario in the analyzed setting, one cannot completely rule out the additional possibility that the genetic background of this variant facilitates its parenteral transmission. Paraboni and colleagues [26] found an association of HCV genotype 2b with dental procedures in southern Brazil. Added to this factor, other aspects associated to CRF patients may also be considered to explain the higher prevalence of genotype 2b, and its facilitated transmission among medical or dental interventions. Finally, yet genotype 2b is not a common variant in Brazil, it is a very prevalent genotype in neighboring countries of its southern boundaries, like Argentina, with which Brazil has an intense population interflow. Such scenario may also contribute to the higher prevalence of genotype 2b in the area.

The Brazilian Public Health System has established guidelines to prevent the spread of HCV in dialysis units [42]. These actions included rigorous implementation of universal precautions and biosafety procedures, screening for anti-HCV among patients, sterilization of dialysis machines and all instruments used and training of healthcare workers. Another important measure implemented is the isolation of patients with positive serology for anti-HCV, even during their transport or transfer, because of the risk of vascular bleeding due to heparinization during dialysis [2, 15, 43]. Under this scenario, it is important to know the serological status of all patients in the unit, so that measures can be implemented successfully. The difficulties on diagnosing HCV infection on CRF patients constitute the major limitation against the efforts to avoid nosocomial transmission on dialysis units. Due to late seroconversion on these patients, serological testing alone is inconclusive for HCV screening, generating false negative results [19, 26, 44, 45].


In conclusion, it has been extensively discussed that patients on hemodialysis treatment are at high risk for HCV infection. Besides the efforts to minimize or eliminate nosocomial transmission of HCV, some events can still be detected in different dialysis units. It is important to consider HCV RNA measurement in these patients, because the immunosuppression inherent to chronic renal disease, as a preventive factor against nosocomial spread of HCV.


Patients and study design

This was a prospective study, developed among patients undergoing hemodialysis treatment from January 2009 to August 2010, followed at two dialysis units located in the city of Rio Grande, southern Brazil. One hundred and fifty nine patients were enrolled in this survey, 116 from Unit 1 and 43 from Unit 2. The study was conducted with the approval of the local Ethics Committee of the Federal University of Rio Grande (number 7222741/2008). Written informed consent was obtained from all patients, and eligibility criteria included age over 17 years and agreement to answer a standardized questionnaire containing sociodemographic variables as well as information on risk behaviors and practices relevant to HCV acquisition.


HCV serology, alanine aminotransferase levels and other biochemical variables were carried out at the dialysis units. Both units performed HCV screening on their patients periodically, on a quarterly basis, by a third-generation anti-HCV ELISA (Imuno-Elisa Anti-HCV, Wamma Diagnóstica, São Paulo, Brazil). During serological screening, one additional sample of 5 mL of whole blood was collected into an ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid tube from each patient enrolled in the study. Plasma was separated and sent to the Laboratory of Molecular Biology of Universidade Federal do Rio Grande (FURG) and stored at −80°C. HCV-positive samples (n = 37) were thawed and analyzed for HCV RNA detection and genotyping.

Determination of HCV RNA and HCV genotype

Viral RNA was extracted from 140 μL of plasma with the QIAamp Viral RNA extraction kit (Qiagen, Chatsworth, USA). A final volume of 60 μL of viral RNA was mixed with 600 ng of random primers (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, USA) in diethylpyrocarbonate-treated water and incubated for 10 min at 70°C. Reverse transcription was carried out with 200 U of Moloney Murine Leukemia Virus reverse transcriptase (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, U.S.A.), 0.1 mol/L DTT, 25 U of RNaseOUT (Life Technologies) and 0.5 mmol/L of each deoxynucleotide for 90 minutes at 37°C. A semi-nested polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay was conducted with the primers Pr3 (5′-TATGAYACCCGCTGYTTTGACTC-3′; outer foward), Pr4 (5′-GCNGARTAYCTVGTCATAGCCTC-3′; inner foward) and Pr5 (5′-GCTAGTCATAGCCTCCGT-3′; reverse) to amplify a 380 bp product corresponding to an internal region of HCV NS5b gene [46]. Additional nested PCR assays were performed with primers PTC1 (5′CGTTAGTATGAGTGTCGTGC3′) and NCR2 (5′ATACTCGAGGTGCACGGTCTACGAGACCT3′) in the first round, and with PTC3 (5′GTGTCGTGCAGCCTCCAGG3′) and NCR4 (5′CACTCTCGAGCACCC TATCAGGCAGT3′) in the second round, to amplify a 220 bp product corresponding to a region of HCV 5′UTR (Campiotto et al., 2005). Finally, for a subset of HCV subtype 2b (see Results), another semi-nested PCR reaction was carried out for amplifying a 470 bp viral genomic fragment spanning the end of the core and the beginning of the E1 genes, using the primers E1-Fow (5′GGCGTCGGTGTYAGRGTYCTGG3′), E1-1stRev (5′GGCRGTCCGRTTTATGTGCC3′) and E1-2ndRev (5′ATGACYTTGGCCCACGCTCC3′). PCR products were analyzed by electrophoresis through a 1.5% agarose gel stained with ethidium bromide.

PCR products were sequenced using the Big Dye v.3.1 kit in an ABI 3130XL Genetic Analyzer (both from Life Technologies). Sequences were manually edited with SeqMan v7.0 (DNASTAR Inc., Madison, USA) and aligned with BioEdit v.7.02316 along with HCV reference sequences from the Los Alamos National Laboratory HCV Database ( Genotypes were determined through phylogenetic inference using neighbor-joining and Kimura’s two-parameter, with 1000 bootstrap replicates, in MEGA 5.

All NS5b DNA sequences generated in this study have been deposited in GenBank and were assigned the numbers [GenBank: JQ711195-JQ711198, KC520829-KC520855]. 5′UTR sequences have not been deposited because they are shorter than 200 bp, a sine qua non condition for submission to the GenBank database.

Statistical analyses

All analyses were performed with STATA® v. 8.0 (Stata Corporation, 2009). The association of time on dialysis in months and HCV infection was assessed by a Student’s t test. HCV prevalence and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated. Bivariate analysis was performed for calculating the prevalence ratios and CIs of several factors and outcomes. In order to adjust for potential confounders, a multivariate analysis was performed using Poisson regression and prevalence ratios (PRs) were determined.


  1. 1.

    Chen SL, Morgan TR: The natural history of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. Int J Med Sci 2006, 3: 47-52.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Shepard CW, Finelli L, Alter MJ: Global epidemiology of hepatitis C virus infection. Lancet Infect Dis 2005, 5: 558-567. 10.1016/S1473-3099(05)70216-4

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Willems M, Metselaar HJ, Tilanus HW, Schalm SW, de Man RA: Liver transplantation and hepatitis C. Transpl Int 2002, 15: 61-72.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    World Health Organization: Hepatitis C Fact Sheet.

  5. 5.

    Pereira LM, Martelli CM, Moreira RC, Merchan-Hamman E, Stein AT, Cardoso MR, Figueiredo GM, Montarroyos UR, Braga C, Turchi MD: Prevalence and risk factors of Hepatitis C virus infection in Brazil, 2005 through 2009: a cross-sectional study. BMC Infect Dis 2013, 13: 60. 10.1186/1471-2334-13-60

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Hepatites Virais em Números.

  7. 7.

    Fabrizi F, Bunnapradist S, Lunghi G, Martin P: Kinetics of hepatitis C virus load during hemodialysis: novel perspectives. J Nephrol 2003, 16: 467-475.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Hinrichsen H, Leimenstoll G, Stegen G, Schrader H, Folsch UR, Schmidt WE: Prevalence and risk factors of hepatitis C virus infection in haemodialysis patients: a multicentre study in 2796 patients. Gut 2002, 51: 429-433. 10.1136/gut.51.3.429

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Salama G, Rostaing L, Sandres K, Izopet J: Hepatitis C virus infection in French hemodialysis units: a multicenter study. J Med Virol 2000, 61: 44-51. 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9071(200005)61:1<44::AID-JMV7>3.0.CO;2-J

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Carneiro MA, Teles SA, Lampe E, Espirito-Santo MP, Gouveia-Oliveira R, Reis NR, Yoshida CF, Martins RM: Molecular and epidemiological study on nosocomial transmission of HCV in hemodialysis patients in Brazil. J Med Virol 2007, 79: 1325-1333. 10.1002/jmv.20932

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Lampe E, Yoshida CF, De Oliveira RV, Lauer GM, Lewis-Ximenez LL: Molecular analysis and patterns of ALT and hepatitis C virus seroconversion in haemodialysis patients with acute hepatitis. Nephrology (Carlton) 2008, 13: 186-192. 10.1111/j.1440-1797.2008.00931.x

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Baid-Agrawal S, Pascual M, Moradpour D, Frei U, Tolkoff-Rubin N: Hepatitis C virus infection in haemodialysis and kidney transplant patients. Rev Med Virol 2008, 18: 97-115. 10.1002/rmv.565

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Khan S, Attaullah S, Ali I, Ayaz S, Khan SN, Siraj S, Khan J, Naseemullah : Rising burden of Hepatitis C Virus in hemodialysis patients. Virol J 2011, 8: 438. 10.1186/1743-422X-8-438

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Barril G, Traver JA: Decrease in the hepatitis C virus (HCV) prevalence in hemodialysis patients in Spain: effect of time, initiating HCV prevalence studies and adoption of isolation measures. Antiviral Res 2003, 60: 129-134. 10.1016/j.antiviral.2003.08.008

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Engel M, Malta FM, Gomes MM, Mello IM, Pinho JR, Ono-Nita SK, Carrilho FJ: Acute hepatitis C virus infection assessment among chronic hemodialysis patients in the Southwest Parana State, Brazil. BMC Public Health 2007, 7: 50. 10.1186/1471-2458-7-50

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Carvalho M, Branco PB, Luvizotto ML, Valderrama DE, Rabone S, Doi E, Ivantes C, Muzzillo DA: High Prevalence of Hepatitis C Virus Infection in Chronic Hemodialysis Patients. Braz J Infect Dis 1999, 3: 144-148.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Carneiro MA, Martins RM, Teles SA, Silva SA, Lopes CL, Cardoso DD, Vanderborght BO, Yoshida CF: Hepatitis C prevalence and risk factors in hemodialysis patients in Central Brazil: a survey by polymerase chain reaction and serological methods. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz 2001, 96: 765-769. 10.1590/S0074-02762001000600003

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Santana GO, Cotrim HP, Mota E, Parana R, Santana NP, Lyra L: Antibodies to hepatitis C virus in patients undergoing hemodialysis in Salvador, BA, Brazil. Arq Gastroenterol 2001, 38: 24-31. 10.1590/S0004-28032001000100006

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Moreira R, Pinho JR, Fares J, Oba IT, Cardoso MR, Saraceni CP, Granato C: Prospective study of hepatitis C virus infection in hemodialysis patients by monthly analysis of HCV RNA and antibodies. Can J Microbiol 2003, 49: 503-507. 10.1139/w03-065

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Busek SU, Baba EH, Tavares Filho HA, Pimenta L, Salomao A, Correa-Oliveira R, Oliveira GC: Hepatitis C and hepatitis B virus infection in different hemodialysis units in Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz 2002, 97: 775-778. 10.1590/S0074-02762002000600003

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Albuquerque AC, Coelho MR, Lopes EP, Lemos MF, Moreira RC: Prevalence and risk factors of hepatitis C virus infection in hemodialysis patients from one center in Recife, Brazil. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz 2005, 100: 467-470. 10.1590/S0074-02762005000500003

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Silva LK, Silva MB, Rodart IF, Lopes GB, Costa FQ, Melo ME, Gusmao E, Reis MG: Prevalence of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection and HCV genotypes of hemodialysis patients in Salvador, Northeastern Brazil. Braz J Med Biol Res 2006, 39: 595-602. 10.1590/S0100-879X2006000500005

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Freitas SZ, da Cunha RV, Martins RM, Teles SA, Ibanhes ML, Motta-Castro AR: Prevalence, genotypes and risk factors associated with hepatitis C virus infection in hemodialysis patients in Campo Grande, MS, Brazil. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz 2008, 103: 405-408.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Souza KP, Luz JA, Teles SA, Carneiro MA, Oliveira LA, Gomes AS, Dias MA, Gomes SA, Yoshida CF, Martins RM: Hepatitis B and C in the hemodialysis unit of Tocantins, Brazil: serological and molecular profiles. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz 2003, 98: 599-603. 10.1590/S0074-02762003000500003

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Martins RM, Teles SA, Freitas NR, Motta-Castro AR, Souto FJ, Mussi A, Amorim RM, Martins CR: Distribution of hepatitis C virus genotypes among blood donors from mid-west region of Brazil. Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo 2006, 48: 53-55. 10.1590/S0036-46652006000100012

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Brandao AB, Fuchs SC, Silva MA, Emer LF: Diagnosis of hepatitis C in clinical practice: review of the literature. Rev Panam Salud Publica 2001, 9: 161-168. 10.1590/S1020-49892001000300005

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Rahnavardi M, Hosseini Moghaddam SM, Alavian SM: Hepatitis C in hemodialysis patients: current global magnitude, natural history, diagnostic difficulties, and preventive measures. Am J Nephrol 2008, 28: 628-640. 10.1159/000117573

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Germano FN, da Silva TM, Mendoza-Sassi R, Martinez AM: High prevalence of users who did not return to the Testing and Counseling Center (TCC) for knowing their serological status: Rio Grande, RS, Brazil. Cien Saude Colet 2008, 13: 1033-1040. 10.1590/S1413-81232008000300026

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Meyers CM, Seeff LB, Stehman-Breen CO, Hoofnagle JH: Hepatitis C and renal disease: an update. Am J Kidney Dis 2003, 42: 631-657. 10.1016/S0272-6386(03)00828-X

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Wasley A, Alter MJ: Epidemiology of hepatitis C: geographic differences and temporal trends. Semin Liver Dis 2000, 20: 1-16. 10.1055/s-2000-9506

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Khaja MN, Madhavi C, Thippavazzula R, Nafeesa F, Habib AM, Habibullah CM, Guntaka RV: High prevalence of hepatitis C virus infection and genotype distribution among general population, blood donors and risk groups. Infect Genet Evol 2006, 6: 198-204. 10.1016/j.meegid.2005.04.001

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Pujol FH, Loureiro CL: Replacement of hepatitis C virus genotype 1b by genotype 2 over a 10-year period in Venezuela. J Clin Gastroenterol 2007, 41: 518-520. 10.1097/01.mcg.0000248010.55149.ce

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Micalessi MI, Gerard C, Ameye L, Plasschaert S, Brochier B, Vranckx R: Distribution of hepatitis C virus genotypes among injecting drug users in contact with treatment centers in Belgium, 2004–2005. J Med Virol 2008, 80: 640-645. 10.1002/jmv.21145

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Svirtlih N, Delic D, Simonovic J, Jevtovic D, Dokic L, Gvozdenovic E, Boricic I, Terzic D, Pavic S, Neskovic G: Hepatitis C virus genotypes in Serbia and Montenegro: the prevalence and clinical significance. World J Gastroenterol 2007, 13: 355-360.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Paraboni ML, Sbeghen MD, Wolff FH, Moreira LB: Risk factors for infection with different hepatitis C virus genotypes in southern Brazil. ScientificWorldJournal 2012, 2012: 946954.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Campiotto S, Pinho JR, Carrilho FJ, Da Silva LC, Souto FJ, Spinelli V, Pereira LM, Coelho HS, Silva AO, Fonseca JC: Geographic distribution of hepatitis C virus genotypes in Brazil. Braz J Med Biol Res 2005, 38: 41-49.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Germano FN, dos Santos CA, Honscha G, Strasburg A, Gabbi B, Mendoza-Sassi RA, Soares EA, Seuanez HN, Soares MA, Martinez AM: Prevalence of hepatitis C virus among users attending a voluntary testing centre in Rio Grande, southern Brazil: predictive factors and hepatitis C virus genotypes. Int J STD AIDS 2010, 21: 466-471. 10.1258/ijsa.2009.009089

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Silva CM, Costi C, Krug LP, Ramos AB, Grandi T, Gandolfi VL, Menezes ME, Ocampos M, Niel C, Rossetti ML: High proportion of hepatitis C virus genotypes 1 and 3 in a large cohort of patients from Southern Brazil. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz 2007, 102: 867-870. 10.1590/S0074-02762007005000122

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Silva LK, Silva MB, Lopes GB, Rodart IF, Costa FQ, Santana NP, Parana R, Santana A, Reis MG: Prevalence of hepatitis C virus infection and HCV genotypes among hemophiliacs in the State of Bahia, Northeastern Brazil: analysis of serological and virological parameters. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop 2005, 38: 496-502. 10.1590/S0037-86822005000600010

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    De Moraes CR: Hepatits C virus infection in hemodialysis patients and workers. A case–control study in Santa Catarina state dialysis units. Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo 2001, 43: 66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Carneiro MA, Teles SA, Dias MA, Ferreira RC, Naghettine AV, Silva SA, Lampe E, Yoshida CF, Martins RM: Decline of hepatitis C infection in hemodialysis patients in Central Brazil: a ten years of surveillance. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz 2005, 100: 345-349. 10.1590/S0074-02762005000400002

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Ministério da Saúde do Brasil: Resolução RDC n° 154 Volume 110. Brasília: Diário Oficial da União; 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Yang CS, Chang HH, Chou CC, Peng SJ: Isolation effectively prevents the transmission of hepatitis C virus in the hemodialysis unit. J Formos Med Assoc 2003, 102: 79-85.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Schroter M, Feucht HH, Schafer P, Zollner B, Laufs R: High percentage of seronegative HCV infections in hemodialysis patients: the need for PCR. Intervirology 1997, 40: 277-278. 10.1159/000150558

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Yuki N, Ishida H, Inoue T, Tabata T, Matsushita Y, Kishimoto H, Kato M, Masuzawa M, Sasaki Y, Hayashi N, Hori M: Reappraisal of biochemical hepatitis C activity in hemodialysis patients. J Clin Gastroenterol 2000, 30: 187-194. 10.1097/00004836-200003000-00012

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Sandres-Saune K, Deny P, Pasquier C, Thibaut V, Duverlie G, Izopet J: Determining hepatitis C genotype by analyzing the sequence of the NS5b region. J Virol Methods 2003, 109: 187-193. 10.1016/S0166-0934(03)00070-3

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


We are indebted to the healthcare personnel of both hemodialysis centers for providing patient support and the samples analyzed in this study. This study was funded by the Brazilian Ministry of Education (CAPES) through the PhD scholarship to FNG; the Brazilian Ministry of Health, through intramural grants to the Brazilian Cancer Institute (INCA); the Brazilian Research Council (CNPq) grant # 573806/2008-0 (National Institute of Science and Technology for Cancer Control) and the Rio de Janeiro State Science Foundation (FAPERJ) grant # E-26/102.858/2008. Funding agencies supported the acquisition of material and reagents and did not take part in patient selection, analysis of results or the writing of this manuscript.

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marcelo Alves Soares.

Additional information

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ contributions

NMOS and FNG conducted all experimental procedures. RAMS performed the statistical analyses. HNS provided reagents and infrastructure for the experimental procedures. MAS and AMBM conceived and financed the study. NMOS, FNG and MAS wrote the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Naylê Maria Oliveira da Silva, Fabiana Nunes Germano contributed equally to this work.

Authors’ original submitted files for images

Below are the links to the authors’ original submitted files for images.

Authors’ original file for figure 1

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

da Silva, N.M.O., Germano, F.N., Mendoza-Sassi, R.A. et al. Evidence of association between hepatitis C virus genotype 2b and nosocomial transmissions in hemodialysis centers from southern Brazil. Virol J 10, 167 (2013).

Download citation


  • Hepatitis C virus
  • Genotype
  • Hemodialysis
  • Nosocomial infection
  • Southern Brazil