Skip to main content
Download PDF

Characterization of recurrent cytomegalovirus reactivations post allogenic stem cell transplantation in a population with high seropositivity

Virology Journal volume 21, Article number: 149 (2024) Cite this article

Abstract

Objectives

This study aimed to characterize incidences of CMV reactivations within one year post-allo-SCT and identify risk factors for CMV second reactivation episode in population with high seropositivity where first CMV reactivation episode deemed to be high.

Methods

This retrospective cohort study analyzed data from 359 allo-SCT patients aged 14 and older admitted to a tertiary academic hospital. Data on demographic and clinical factors, CMV serostatus, conditioning regimens, graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis, engraftment time, and CMV reactivations were collected.

Results

First and second CMV reactivations occurred in 88.9% and 18.4% of post-allo-SCT patients respectively. Patients were stratified into two groups based on primary disease necessitating allo-SCT, patients with malignant (Group 1) and non-malignant (Group 2) hematological disease. Factors associated with the second reactivation included cord blood as a stem cell source, human leukocyte antigen mismatch, acute graft-versus-host disease, and hematological malignancies. Patients with non-malignant hematological disease displayed better outcomes, including a higher rate of spontaneous clearance of first CMV reactivation (70% versus 49.4%) and lower rates of second CMV reactivation (9.6% versus 31%) than those with malignant hematological disease. The one-year overall survival rate was 87.7% (95.5% in non-malignant hematological disease and 78.13% in malignant hematological disease).

Conclusion

Our findings are concordant with previous local study in regard to high rate of first CMV reactivation post-allo-SCT. It appears that patients with nonmalignant hematological disease had better outcomes, such as lower second CMV reactivation and higher survival rates compared to patients with malignant hematological disease. Further investigation is needed to identify other factors affecting recurrent CMV reactivations in allo-SCT in patients with malignant hematological disease.

Introduction

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) reactivation after allogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) is considered one of the main risk factors for increased mortality post-allo-SCT [1, 2]. It is associated with higher rate of graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) and bacterial and fungal infections in allo-SCT recipients [3, 4]. The global average prevalence of CMV seropositivity was estimated to be as low as 66% in European regions which considered to be the lowest and as high as 90% in Eastern Mediterranean which considered to be the highest [5]. CMV seropositive status is one of the important predicting factors for post-allo-SCT CMV reactivation owing to its ability to regulate immune system response [6].

Onset of CMV reactivation is typically reported within 28 to 72 days after transplantation; affecting 40–60% of bone marrow allogeneic transplant recipients and may progress to severe CMV-related diseases [7,8,9]. It is worth mentioning that variation in CMV reactivation definition among clinical studies may contribute to the wide ranges of CMV reactivation rates seen in literature. Two strategies are presented to prevent CMV reactivation, prophylaxis and preemptive therapy. Preemptive therapy used to be the standard of care to avoid toxicities associated with antiviral therapy; until letermovir approved in 2017 [6]. Antiviral drugs are valganciclovir, ganciclovir and foscarnet that are well known for their clinical effectiveness in reducing CMV viral load and their toxicities (hematological toxicity with valganciclovir and ganciclovir; nephrotoxicity with foscarnet) [6, 10, 11]. The American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy (ASTCT) recommended letermovir prophylaxis for adult CMV seropositive allogeneic SCT recipients, to begin no later than 28 days after SCT and continuing through day 100 [12].

Letermovir is an antiviral agent that inhibits the CMV DNA terminase complex, a requisite for viral DNA processing and packaging. It received approval from the Food and Drug Administration in 2017 for prophylaxis in adult seropositive SCT recipients [13]; notably, this agent was more effective in lowering the incidence of CMV reactivation than placebo without compromising engraftment in CMV-seropositive patients [13]. To date, letermovir is a non-formulary drug in most healthcare institutions in Saudi Arabia, including our institution the Ministry of National Guard Health Affairs (MNGHA).

A previous study conducted by Damlaj et al. at the MNGHA has described CMV reactivation after allo-SCT in 195 patients and revealed that over 90% of patients developed first episode of CMV reactivation post-allo-SCT [14]. CMV reactivation prevention strategy followed at our institution is preemptive therapy. The cutoff CMV viral load that triggers starting antiviral therapy is more than or equal to 1000 copies/mL. Additionally, they identified several risk factors associated with decreased overall survival at two years, including advanced age, underlying malignant diseases, and chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGvHD).

Evidently, data describing risk factors associated with recurrent CMV reactivations in populations with high rate of first CMV reactivation post-allo-SCT are lacking. Hence, this study aimed to identify the incidence of first and second recurrent CMV reactivations post-allo-SCT and risk factors for second recurrent CMV reactivation episode considering the high rate of first recurrent CMV reactivation post-allo-SCT.

Materials and methods

Study design and setting

This was a retrospective single-center cohort study of patients who underwent allo-SCT between April 2014 and June 2022. Patients aged 14 years or older were required to have undergone serial CMV quantitative PCR post-allo-SCT, monitored at least once weekly during the initial 90 days post-transplantation, and then bi-weekly thereafter, to be included in the study. Number of patients with no CMV reactivation was recorded to identify rate of first CMV reactivation but excluded from analysis. Patients who died within 30 days of transplantation with no documented CMV reactivation episodes and those who received antiviral treatment for CMV DNAemia without CMV quantitative PCR testing for monitoring were excluded from the study.

This study received Institutional Review Board approval (NRC22R/011/01) from the King Abdullah International Research Center at the MNGHA Hospital in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Data collection and statistical analysis

The following data were collected: demographic and baseline comorbidities, underlying disease, conditioning regimen, source of stem cell transplant, type of donor (human leukocyte antigen [HLA] typing), type of GvHD prophylaxis if received, time for engraftment, presence of acute and/or chronic GvHD, CMV donor-recipient serostatus, time to first CMV reactivation after transplantation, and need for antiviral therapy for CMV DNAemia with peak levels of serum CMV PCR. Non-relapse mortality at 90 days post-allo-SCT and overall one-year survival were also collected. Furthermore, data were analyzed based on allo-SCT recipients with malignant and non-malignant hematological diseases. First and second CMV reactivation post-allo-SCT and spontaneous clearance were monitored and recorded for both groups in this study.

The main outcome variables were the incidence of first and second CMV reactivations within one year of clearing the first episode of CMV reactivation as the primary outcomes. Non-relapse mortality 90 days after stem cell transplantation (SCT) and overall one-year survival were the secondary outcomes.

The main independent variable was the hematological malignancy status, which was classified into two groups: yes and no. Other control variables included age, sex, body mass index (BMI), liver disease, diabetes mellitus, heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, hypertension, renal disease, stroke, bedridden status, smoking, respiratory disease, conditional regimen, source of stem cell transplant, type of donor, donor-recipient CMV serostatus, receiving GvHD prophylaxis including calcineurin inhibitors, methotrexate, mycophenolate, cyclophosphamide, systemic steroid, acute GvHD, chronic GvHD, grade I-IV of acute GvHD, viral load at first reactivation, and peak viral level before starting anti-CMV if indicated.

A series of univariate tests, including chi-square and Student’s t-tests, were used to compare patients with and without hematological malignancies, with a significance level of p < 0.05. The data were analyzed using R Core Team (2020).

Three independent logistic regression models were generated to predict the main dependent variables (second CMV reactivation, non-relapse mortality at 90 days post-allo-SCT and overall one-year survival). The models were based on an automatic stepwise selection process from the list of independent and control variables. All intended variables were entered into the model at a significance level of 0.3 to enter the model, and a significance level of 0.35 was required for a variable to stay in the model.

Definitions

  • CMV monitoring: Whole blood specimen was collected in EDTA tubes then centrifuged for which plasma (supernatant) was transferred to another tube. QIAGEN EZ1 assay was used for Viral DNA extraction and Abbott Real Time CMV m2000rt assay for CMV amplification following standardization reference according to the 1st WHO international standard techniques. The sensitivity of the assay is 20 copies/mL (31.2 IU/mL) of plasma. Abbott Real Time CMV assay targets UL34 and UL80.5 genes sequence within CMV genome which are highly specific and conserved for CMV. Rare mutations might be present in highly conserved regions of CMV genome for which Abbott Real Time CMV assay mitigate this risk by amplifying two selected targets of the conserved regions as indicated in the product package insert [15].

  • First recurrent CMV reactivation post-allo-SCT was defined as the first detectable CMV viral load from blood samples post-allo-SCT (viral load > 20 copies/mL) for at least two consecutive tests, one week apart [16].

  • Second recurrent CMV reactivation post-allo-SCT was defined as the first detectable CMV viral load from blood samples post-allo-SCT (viral load > 20 copies/mL) within one year (must be > 4 weeks) after clearing the first CMV reactivation for at least two consecutive tests, one week apart [16].

  • Spontaneous clearance of CMV DNAemia was defined as the first two negative CMV PCR tests from blood samples one week apart, without any medical intervention [16].

  • CMV DNAemia clearance was defined as a spontaneous clearance but with medical intervention (anti-CMV therapy).

  • Conditioning regimen

Myeloablative conditioning (MAC) was defined as high-dose of chemotherapy (alkylating agent) with or without total body irradiation based regimens [17]. It does not allow for autologous hematological recovery secondary to complete ablation of bone marrow [18].

Reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) was defined based on the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR) operational definitions discussed at Reduced-Intensity Conditioning Regimen Workshop (illustrated below) [19].

  • TBI less than or equal to 500 cGy as a single fraction or less than or equal to 800 cGy if fractionated.

  • Total busulfan less than or equal to 9 mg/kg of oral busulfan

  • Total melphalan less than or equal to140 mg/m [2].

  • Thiotepa less than 10 mg/kg

Non-myeloablative (NMA) conditioning was defined by regimens that resulted in minimal cytopenia with no stem cell support needed [17].

  • Engraftment was defined as the first of three consecutive days with an absolute neutrophil count higher than 0.5 × 109/L (sustained > 20 × 109/L platelets and hemoglobin > 80 g/L and free of transfusion requirements).

Results

Demographic characteristics

A total of 404 patients were screened between April 2014 and June 2022, 359 of whom met the inclusion criteria (Fig. 1). Of the excluded patients, 45 were excluded because of the absence of CMV first reactivation post-allo-SCT; hence, the incidence of patients with documented first CMV reactivation post-allo-SCT from the total screened patients was 88.9% (n = 359/404). The patients were subsequently categorized into two groups based on the underlying disease necessitating allo-SCT: patients with malignant hematological diseases (MHD; Group 1, n = 160) and those with non-malignant hematological diseases (NHD; Group 2, n = 199).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Flowchart illustrating patient screening and inclusion and exclusion criteria. CMV: Cytomegalovirus

Full size image

Table 1 displays the characteristics of patients who experienced documented first CMV reactivation post-allo-SCT. These patients were predominantly male (57%), had an average age of 29 years, and an average BMI of 24 kg/m2.

Table 1 Baseline characteristics of allogenic SCT with CMV reactivations
Full size table

Malignant hematological diseases (Group 1)

In the MHD group, one hundred and sixty patients had a mean age of 34 years, and approximately 60% of them were male. Only 13% had at least one comorbidity, with diabetes mellitus being the most common, followed by hypertension. The most common underlying diseases necessitating allo-SCT were acute lymphoblastic leukemia and acute myeloid leukemia in approximately 75% of patients. Furthermore, more than 75% of the patients received a myeloablative regimen during the conditioning phase. The source of stem cells was primarily peripheral blood (> 90%). More than 80% of stem cell recipients received HLA-matched donors, whereas only 16% received mismatched donors. Notably, approximately 94% (~ 150) of patients had a D + /R + CMV serostatus. Importantly, nearly half of the patients developed acute GvHD (33.75%; 54/160) that progressed to chronic GvHD (48%; 26/54).

Overall, majority of patients had acute lymphoblastic leukemia, received myeloablative regimen for conditioning regimen and received HLA- matched donor. Supplementary data are presented in Table 1.

Non-malignant hematological diseases (Group 2)

A total of 199 patients with an average age of 26 years were predominantly male (55%), with a BMI of 23.7 kg/m2. Stroke and other neurological diseases, followed by diabetes mellitus and renal disease were the most frequently observed comorbidities.

More than 90% of the patients in this group had sickle cell anemia and aplastic anemia as the underlying diseases necessitating allo-SCT. Most patients received a non-myeloablative conditioning regimen, followed by a reduced-intensity regimen (83% and 14%, respectively). Similar to Group 1, the source of stem cells was peripheral cells in > 90% of the patients. Most of the patients had an HLA-matched donor. Moreover, the CMV serostatus was positive for donors and recipients in more than 84% of the patients, followed by negative donors and positive recipients. Most patients achieved full engraftment at 3 weeks post-SCT. Finally, 21 patients developed acute GvHD, with most patients having Grade I GVHD (57%; n = 12).

Predominantly, patients had sickle cell anemia and received non-myeloablative conditioning regimen. Rate of acute GvHD is significantly lower compared to Group1 (10.55% versus 33.75%, p = 0.001). Further details are provided in Table 1 and supplementary Table 1.

Incidence of recurrent CMV reactivations post-allo-SCT

Recurrent CMV reactivations in the group 1:

The mean time between allo-SCT and the first episode of recurrent CMV reactivation was 23.8 days, with an average first-detected viral load of 3670 copies/mL. The percentage of patients who spontaneously cleared CMV DNAemia without needing anti-CMV treatment was 49.4% (n = 79) at a mean time of 55 days. Twenty-nine percent of the patients (n = 47) were admitted for febrile neutropenia, with confirmed bacterial infections in approximately 90% of them. Thirty-eight percent of patients received antibiotics for either febrile neutropenia and/or bacterial infection, with the most frequently prescribed antibiotics being meropenem, vancomycin, and piperacillin/tazobactam. Patients developed DNAemia and necessitated anti-CMV therapy, specifically with valganciclovir, ganciclovir, and foscarnet, for 48, 46, and 13 patients, respectively. A total of 79 patients (49.4%) received anti-CMV treatment, among whom 67 (85%) successfully cleared CMV viremia through treatment. Moreover, seven patients developed CMV disease, manifesting as pneumonitis (n = 4), colitis (n = 2), and hepatitis (n = 1). Further details are available in Table 2.

Table 2 Description of first and second recurrent CMV reactivations, CMV pre-emptive therapy and disease
Full size table

Thirty one percent of patients developed second recurrent CMV reactivation within an average time of 82 days post clearance of first episode of CMV reactivation post-all-SCT. Viral load levels and rate of spontaneous clearance improved compared to the first CMV recurrent reactivation episode. More details in Table 2 and Figs. 2 and 3

Fig. 2
figure 2

Onset of recurrent CMV reactivations and spontaneous clearance. Allo-SCT: Allogenic Stem Cell Transplantation, CMV: Cytomegalovirus. MHD: Malignant Hematological Disease, NHD: Non-malignant Hematological Diseases

Full size image
Fig. 3
figure 3

Disposition of patients with first CMV recurrent reactivation. CMV: Cytomegalovirus. MHD: Malignant Hematological Disease. NHD: Non-malignant Hematological Diseases

Full size image

Recurrent CMV reactivation in the group 2:

The average time for first recurrent CMV reactivation was approximately 17 days post-allo-SCT, with an average viral load of 107 copies/mL at the first documented activation. The viral load peaked at an average of 5537 copies/mL. Notably, seventy percent of patients (70%, n = 139/199) experienced spontaneous clearance within an average time of 57 days following reactivation. Approximately 25% of the patients with first recurrent CMV reactivation developed febrile neutropenia, and 18% had confirmed bacterial infections. Those who did not achieve spontaneous clearance were treated with anti-CMV therapy (30%, n = 60/199), utilizing valganciclovir (n = 33), ganciclovir (n = 25), or foscarnet (n = 21). Of these, 88% achieved CMV DNAemia clearance (n = 53/60), and within this subgroup, two patients developed CMV diseases. Further details are provided in Table 2.

Approximately, 10% of patients developed second recurrent CMV reactivation within 44 days after the clearance of first episode. Similarly, second episode of CMV reactivation in this group was associated with better outcomes in terms of viral load levels and rate of spontaneous clearance as in MHD group. Full descriptive data provided in Table 2 and Figs. 2 and 4

Fig. 4
figure 4

Disposition of patients with second CMV recurrent reactivation. CMV: Cytomegalovirus. MHD: Malignant Hematological Disease. NHD: Non-malignant Hematological Diseases

Full size image

Non-relapse mortality at 90 days post-allo-SCT and one-year overall survival rate

The non-relapse mortality at 90 days post-allo-SCT was 3.8%, with one-year overall survival rate of 78.13% in MHD group. In contrast, in the NHD group, three patients died within 90 days after allo-SCT and the one-year overall survival was 95.5%.

The one-year overall survival in the MHD group was significantly lower than did those in the NHD group (78.13% vs. 95.5%, p < 0.001).

Predictors of second recurrent CMV reactivation risk and overall survival at one year

Factors associated with an increased rate of second recurrent CMV reactivation within one year following the initial episode of first recurrent CMV reactivation post-allo-SCT include cord blood as a source of transplanted stem cells, HLA mismatch, patients with acute GvHD, and those with hematological malignancies; the respective Odds Ratios and 95% Confidence Intervals, along with p-values, are as follows: (2.7; 1.05–6.88, p = 0.04), (6.8; 2.44–19.31, p = 0.0008), (2.1; 1.01–4.36, p = 0.047), and (2.98; 1.55–5.72, p = 0.001).

For first-year overall survival, patients who received cord blood as a source of SCT had a higher risk for death at 1 year than did those who did not (Odds Ratio [OD]; 95% Confidence Interval [CI], p-value: 0.20; 0.08–0.538, 0.001). Similarly, those with hematological malignancies had a higher risk for death at 1 year compared than did those without such malignancies (OD; 95% CI, p-value: 0.223; 0.098–0.506, 0.0003) (Table 3).

Table 3 Multivariate logistic regression analysis of predictors and risk factors for second CMV reactivation within one-year after clearing first episode of CMV reactivation post allo-SCT and overall survival in one year
Full size table

Discussion

This study was the first to evaluate the first and second recurrent CMV reactivation episodes in patients who underwent allo-SCT in a population with high CMV seropositivity; stratified based on underlying malignant and non-malignant hematological diseases. Unsurprisingly, 89% of patients experienced first recurrent CMV reactivation, regardless of their underlying disease; however, the outcomes were different [14]. Outcomes such as the rate of CMV DNAemia spontaneous clearance, second recurrent CMV reactivation, and overall survival at 1 year were all favorable in the NHD group compared to those in the MHD group. Specifically, the second recurrent CMV reactivation, patients with hematological malignancies were at a higher risk of the second recurrent CMV reactivation (31%) than those with non-malignant hematological diseases (9.6%). Compared with other study, the overall second reactivation rate was (24%), with the majority of patients having hematological malignancies and CMV D + /R + or D-/R + serology in > 80% of the patients [20]. Moreover, only (65%) of patients experienced first CMV reactivation post-allo-SCT. Authors utilized preemptive approach for prevention of CMV reactivation where CMV viral load threshold was not described in their study. Additionally, CMV reactivation was defined as CMV viral load necessitating anti-CMV therapy which might explain the differences between our results and theirs. Thus, direct, and meaningful comparison between two studies is impossible taking into consideration previously mentioned limitations.

In the NHD group of our cohort, we made a comparison with the results of the study by Takenaka et al., who investigated CMV reactivation in patients with aplastic anemia undergoing allo-SCT. The rates of first recurrent CMV reactivation were 90% and 55% in our and Takenaka's cohorts, respectively, which can be attributed to the notably high rate of seropositivity in our cohort and different definition of CMV reactivation in their study (CMV viremia > 500 copies/mL). Takenaka et al. calculated the overall survival for a period of 3 years post-allo-SCT, making it challenging to directly compare with our 1-year overall survival rates (88% versus 95.5%) [21]. It is conceivable that the overall survival could decline in our cohort if monitoring were extended over a longer period.

A higher proportion of patients in the NHD group were able to spontaneously clear CMV DNAemia, exhibited lower average CMV viral peak levels, and manifested a reduced rate of second recurrent CMV reactivation (9.6%). Contributing factors to this reduced rate include a smaller proportion of patients receiving cord blood as a source of transplanted stem cells and fewer instances of mismatched-related and acute GvHD. In contrast, the MHD group demonstrated divergent behavior concerning the aforementioned outcomes, making it evident that hematological malignancy triples the risk of second recurrent CMV reactivation. The lack of comparative studies for assessing risk factors associated with second recurrent CMV reactivation posed challenges in the preparation of this manuscript. However, this appears to be the first study to address this issue within an allo-SCT population. Moreover, Wagner-Drouet et al. reported the rates of recurrent CMV reactivations for the first and second episodes without evaluating risk factors (n = 101/154, 65.6%; 24/101, 19.8%) [20].

In our study population, we observed a positive association between acute GvHD and second recurrent CMV reactivation. This finding is consistent with previous studies that proven this association with first CMV reactivation [22,23,24,25]. The results of the study by Akahoshi et al., who examined the development of grade II-IV acute GvHD in patients with first CMV reactivation, showed bidirectional relationship between both [25].

In multivariate analysis, HLA mismatch was associated with a six-fold increase in the incidence of second recurrent CMV reactivation; however, it could be augmented by the presence of other factors, such as acute GvHD and umbilical cord cells as a source of transplanted stem cells and type of GvHD prophylaxis received [25,26,27].

High-dose steroids were not significantly associated with a greater risk of CMV second reactivation in our population, contradicting the results of a recent study by Suarez-Liedo et al. [28]. They found a significantly higher incidence of CMV reactivation and recurrence in the group with D + /R + CMV serostatus who received steroids than in patients who did not receive steroids in the same group [28]. Moreover, the effects of high-dose steroids on CMV-specific immune reconstitution remain controversial [29]. Some studies have shown that patients with allo-SCT who receive high-dose steroids have lower levels of CD8 + /INF + lymphocytes (cytomegalovirus-specific CD8 + T cells) than those who do not receive high-dose steroids do [28, 30], whereas others showed steroid use is associated with qualitative rather than quantitative dysfunctional CMV- CD8 + T cells [31].

It is notable that time for CMV reactivations were significantly longer in patients with hematological malignancies compared to those with non-malignant diseases as illustrated in Fig. 2. One explanation would be that CMV reactivations might initially happen in the peripheral organs/ tissues and could not achieve detectable amount of CMV DNAemia in the blood of patients with hematological disease in a timely fashion [32]. This opens the door to discuss the utility of CMV- specific CD8 + T cells for diagnosis of CMV reactivation in situations where CMV DNA plasma level test result is unsatisfactory.

Letermovir is indicated for CMV prophylaxis in CMV-seropositive allo-SCT patients starting between days 0 and 28 post-SCT and extended to day 100 for CMV prophylaxis [8]; if unavailable owing to cost, access, or other factors, a preemptive approach is recommended [19]. In a pivotal phase 3 randomized clinical trial, compared to placebo, letermovir significantly reduced the incidence of clinically significant CMV infection through week 24 post-allo-SCT (18.9% vs. 44.3%; p< 0.001) [8]. This significant finding led to its approval as primary prophylaxis against CMV in CMV-seropositive allo-SCT patients. Another study in which letermovir was administered to high-risk patients indicated that letermovir effectively prevented and delayed CMV infections [20]. The results revealed a significant reduction in CMV infection rates compared to data from the period before the introduction of letermovir (10% vs. 54%, p < 0.001). However, several healthcare institutions in Saudi Arabia have yet to integrate letermovir as a standard policy; instead, it is often used as a non-formulary alternative, primarily for secondary CMV prophylaxis. Based on our study findings, which highlight a significant prevalence of CMV-seropositive patients and, consequently, a high occurrence of CMV reactivations, we advocate the inclusion of letermovir in the formulary and its integration as a standard policy for allo-SCT infection prophylaxis in our institution to mitigate CMV-related risks and complications. Lastly, the presence of hematological malignancies tripled the occurrence risk of second recurrent CMV reactivation and impacted overall survival at one year, with a 20% probability of decreased survival by one year.

Nonetheless, this study had several limitations. First, this was a single-center, retrospective study. Furthermore, owing to the retrospective nature of this study, some missing data could bias the results as possible confounding factors that could hinder the statistical analysis. Therefore, future prospective multicenter studies are needed to identify additional risk factors for CMV reactivations.

Conclusion

Our study showed that majority of allo-SCT patients experienced first recurrent CMV reactivation, possibly because of the high prevalence of CMV seropositivity before transplantation. Other outcomes, such as the rate of spontaneous clearance of CMV DNAemia, second CMV reactivation, and overall survival at one year, were all favorable in the NHD group compared with those of the MHD group which highlights the significance impact of underlying disease on recurrent CMV reactivations.

Availability of data and materials

Data and materials involved in this study are available upon request from the corresponding author.

References

  1. Teira P, et al. Early cytomegalovirus reactivation remains associated with increased transplant-related mortality in the current era: a CIBMTR analysis. Blood. 2016;127(20):2427–38.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Green ML, et al. Cytomegalovirus viral load and mortality after haemopoietic stem cell transplantation in the era of pre-emptive therapy: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet Haematol. 2016;3(3):e119–27.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Chan ST, Logan AC. The clinical impact of cytomegalovirus infection following allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation: Why the quest for meaningful prophylaxis still matters. Blood Rev. 2017;31(3):173–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Nichols WG, et al. High risk of death due to bacterial and fungal infection among cytomegalovirus (CMV)-seronegative recipients of stem cell transplants from seropositive donors: evidence for indirect effects of primary CMV infection. J Infect Dis. 2002;185(3):273–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Zuhair M, et al. Estimation of the worldwide seroprevalence of cytomegalovirus: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Rev Med Virol. 2019;29(3):e2034.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Jakharia N, Howard D, Riedel DJ. CMV infection in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: prevention and treatment strategies. Curr Treat Options Infect Dis. 2021;13(3):123–40.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Vallejo M, et al. Risk prediction of CMV reactivation after allogeneic stem cell transplantation using five non-HLA immunogenetic polymorphisms. Ann Hematol. 2022;101(7):1567–76.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Mariotti J, et al. Risk factors for early cytomegalovirus reactivation and impact of early cytomegalovirus reactivation on clinical outcomes after T cell-replete haploidentical transplantation with post-transplantation cyclophosphamide. Transplant Cell Ther. 2022;28(3):169 e1-169 e9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Azevedo LS, et al. Cytomegalovirus infection in transplant recipients. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2015;70(7):515–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Chawla JS, et al. Oral valganciclovir versus ganciclovir as delayed pre-emptive therapy for patients after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant: a pilot trial (04–0274) and review of the literature. Transpl Infect Dis. 2012;14(3):259–67.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Reusser P, et al. Randomized multicenter trial of foscarnet versus ganciclovir for preemptive therapy of cytomegalovirus infection after allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Blood. 2002;99(4):1159–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hakki M, et al. American Society for transplantation and cellular therapy series: #3-Prevention of cytomegalovirus infection and disease after hematopoietic cell transplantation. Transplant Cell Ther. 2021;27(9):707–19.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Marty FM, et al. Letermovir prophylaxis for cytomegalovirus in hematopoietic-cell transplantation. N Engl J Med. 2017;377(25):2433–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Damlaj M, et al. Optimal pre-emptive cytomegalovirus therapy threshold in a patient population with high prevalence of seropositive status. Curr Res Transl Med. 2020;68(3):131–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Abbott Real Time CMV m2000rt assay for CMV amplification A.M. Inc, Editor. 2017, Abbott Laboratories Des Plaines. p. 1–15.

  16. Ljungman P, et al. Definitions of cytomegalovirus infection and disease in transplant patients for use in clinical trials. Clin Infect Dis. 2017;64(1):87–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Bacigalupo A, et al. Defining the intensity of conditioning regimens: working definitions. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2009;15(12):1628–33.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Gyurkocza B, Sandmaier BM. Conditioning regimens for hematopoietic cell transplantation: one size does not fit all. Blood. 2014;124(3):344–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Giralt S, et al. Reduced-intensity conditioning regimen workshop: defining the dose spectrum. Report of a workshop convened by the center for international blood and marrow transplant research. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2009;15(3):367–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Wagner-Drouet E, et al. Standardized monitoring of cytomegalovirus-specific immunity can improve risk stratification of recurrent cytomegalovirus reactivation after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Haematologica. 2021;106(2):363–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Takenaka K, et al. Negative impact of cytomegalovirus reactivation on survival in adult patients with aplastic anemia after an allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a report from transplantation-related complication and adult aplastic anemia working groups of the Japan Society for hematopoietic cell transplantation. Transplant Cell Ther. 2021;27(1):82 e1-82 e8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Ljungman P, et al. Risk factors for the development of cytomegalovirus disease after allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Haematologica. 2006;91(1):78–83.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Ljungman P, Hakki M, Boeckh M. Cytomegalovirus in hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am. 2011;25(1):151–69.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Akahoshi Y, et al. Effect of cytomegalovirus reactivation with or without acute graft-versus-host disease on the risk of nonrelapse mortality. Clin Infect Dis. 2021;73(3):e620–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Cantoni N, et al. Evidence for a bidirectional relationship between cytomegalovirus replication and acute graft-versus-host disease. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2010;16(9):1309–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Yokoyama H, et al. Effects of HLA mismatch on cytomegalovirus reactivation in cord blood transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2019;54(7):1004–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Ueda Oshima M, et al. Impact of GVHD prophylaxis on CMV reactivation and disease after HLA-matched peripheral blood stem cell transplantation. Blood Adv. 2023;7(8):1394–403.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Suarez-Lledo M, et al. Deleterious effect of steroids on cytomegalovirus infection rate after allogeneic stem cell transplantation depends on pretransplant cytomegalovirus serostatus of donors and recipients. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2018;24(10):2088–93.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Pastore D, et al. Recovery of CMV-specific CD8+ T cells and Tregs after allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell transplantation. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2011;17(4):550–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Cwynarski K, et al. Direct visualization of cytomegalovirus-specific T-cell reconstitution after allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Blood. 2001;97(5):1232–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Ozdemir E, et al. Cytomegalovirus reactivation following allogeneic stem cell transplantation is associated with the presence of dysfunctional antigen-specific CD8+ T cells. Blood. 2002;100(10):3690–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Zhang J, et al. The establishment of a cytomegalovirus -specific CD8(+) T-cell threshold by kinetic modeling for the prediction of post-hemopoietic stem cell transplant reactivation. iScience. 2022;25(11):105340.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study did not receive any specific grants from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or non-profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Pharmaceutical Care, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Ministry of National Guard-Health Affairs, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

    Hajar Y. AlQahtani, Nada AlSuhebany, Shuroug A. Alowais & Bashayer AlShehri

  2. King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

    Hajar Y. AlQahtani, Nada AlSuhebany, Shuroug A. Alowais, Ahmad AlHarbi, Hind Alhatmi, Sarah Almansour, Abdulellah Almohaya & Mohammed Bosaeed

  3. King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

    Hajar Y. AlQahtani, Sarah Almansour & Abdulellah Almohaya

  4. College of Pharmacy, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

    Nada AlSuhebany, Shuroug A. Alowais, Amirah Alghanim, Hessa Alqahtani, Lama Alkhathran, Majd Alyaqub & Mariam Alsulimani

  5. Department of Clinical Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, Al-Kharj, Al Riyadh Province, Saudi Arabia

    Abdullah Althemery

  6. Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Ministry of National Guard-Health Affairs, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

    Ahmad AlHarbi, Hind Alhatmi, Sarah Almansour, Abdulellah Almohaya & Mohammed Bosaeed

  7. College of Medicine, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

    Ahmad AlHarbi, Hind Alhatmi & Mohammed Bosaeed

Authors
  1. Hajar Y. AlQahtani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Nada AlSuhebany
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Shuroug A. Alowais
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Bashayer AlShehri
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Abdullah Althemery
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Amirah Alghanim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Hessa Alqahtani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Lama Alkhathran
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Majd Alyaqub
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Mariam Alsulimani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Ahmad AlHarbi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Hind Alhatmi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Sarah Almansour
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Abdulellah Almohaya
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  15. Mohammed Bosaeed
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

H.A., N.A., BA, and M.B. conceptualized the research idea and designed the study methodology. A.A., H.A., L.A., M.A. and M. Alsulimani collected the data. H.A., A. Althemery, N.A. and S.A. analyzed the data and reviewed initial draft of the manuscript. All authors agreed on final version of the manuscript for final submission.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hajar Y. AlQahtani.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of King Abdullah International Medical Research Center (protocol number NRC22R/011/01). Due to the design of this study, informed consent from patients was not required. The research was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. The research team restricted the participants’ information and maintained confidentiality throughout the study period by assigning serial numbers to each participant.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing financial interests or personal relationships that may have influenced the work reported in this study.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

AlQahtani, H.Y., AlSuhebany, N., Alowais, S.A. et al. Characterization of recurrent cytomegalovirus reactivations post allogenic stem cell transplantation in a population with high seropositivity. Virol J 21, 149 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12985-024-02421-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12985-024-02421-y

Keywords

Virology Journal

ISSN: 1743-422X