Skip to main content
Download PDF

Identification and characterization of a polyomavirus in the thornback skate (Raja clavata)

Virology Journal volume 20, Article number: 190 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Members of the family Polyomaviridae have a circular double-stranded DNA genome that have been identified in various hosts ranging from mammals to arachnids. Here we report the identification and analysis of a complete genome sequence of a novel polyomavirus, Raja clavata polyomavirus (RcPyV1), from a cartilaginous fish, the thornback skate (Raja clavata). The genome sequence was determined using a metagenomics approach with an aim to provide baseline viral data in cartilaginous fish in different ecosystems. The RcPyV1 genome (4,195 nucleotides) had typical organization of polyomavirus, including early antigens (small T; Large T) encoded on one strand and late viral proteins (VP1; VP2) on the complementary strand. Maximum-likelihood phylogenetic analysis of the large T-antigen revealed that RcPyV1 clusters with a polyomavirus obtained from another cartilaginous fish, the guitarfish polyomavirus 1 (GfPyV1). These two share ~ 56% pairwise identity in LT and VP1 protein sequences. These analyses support the hypothesis that cartilaginous fishes have a specific lineage of polyomaviruses.

Introduction

The family Polyomaviridae is composed of small, non-enveloped, double-stranded DNA viruses with a circular genome of approximately 4,000–7,000 nucleotides (nts) in length [1, 2]. These viruses exhibit a conserved organization with an early region and a late region separated by a non-coding regulatory region (NCRR) [3], which contains the early and late promoters and the origin of replication. The early region encodes up to five non-structural tumor antigen proteins, which are involved in viral replication and oncogenesis. The large and small tumor antigen proteins (LT and sT, respectively) are universally expressed by polyomaviruses [1, 3]. The LT is a multiregulatory protein that is required for the initiation of viral replication and activation of the late region promoter, but also for the suppression of its own promoter, thus regulating early gene expression (reviewed in [4]). The precise function of the sT protein is unclear, but it has been suggested to play a role in the regulation of the viral replication cycle (reviewed in [4]). The late region encodes the capsid proteins VP1, VP2 and VP3, which are important for virion assembly and nuclear egress [2, 3]. In addition, the polyomavirus simian virus 40 (SV40) also produces a late VP4 protein [5]. The early and late regions of polyomavirus (PyVs) genomes may further encode alternatively spliced forms of the encoded proteins, such as the alternative large T antigen open reading frame (ALTO; [6] or the agnoprotein [7]). The agnoprotein is a regulatory protein essential for sustaining a productive viral life cycle, being involved in viral DNA replication, viral transcription, virion maturation and release (reviewed in [4]). The ALTO protein has been shown to be expressed, but not being essential, during replication, most likely playing an accessory role [6]. More recently, the DUO protein has also been identified in different polyomavirus (https://ccrod.cancer.gov/confluence/display/LCOTF/Polyomavirus), however, there are no studies addressing its function.

PyVs have been identified in several mammals [8,9,10,11], birds [12], fishes [13, 14] and arthropods [15]. In fish, PyVs have been described in perciform fish such as the black sea bass (Centropristis striata) [16], the gilt-head sea bream (Sparus aurata) [17], the sharp-spined notothen (Trematomus pennellii) and emerald notothen (Trematomus bernacchii) [1, 14], but also in cartilaginous fish taxa such as the giant guitarfish (Rhynchobatus djiddensis) [1, 13]. Chimeric viral genomes that encode proteins related to those of PyVs have been reported in the eel species Anguilla japonica and A. marmorata [18,19,20]. Fish PyVs belong to at least two distinct evolutionary lineages, one comprising perciform-fish PyVs and the other encompassing cartilaginous fish PyVs [14], which only includes a single PyV detected in the giant guitarfish (GfPyV1; [13].

Cartilaginous fishes are the oldest group of extant vertebrates, being the most basal living jawed vertebrates. Cartilaginous fishes can be divided into two very distinct subclasses, Elasmobranchii (sharks, rays and skates) and Holocephali (chimaeras), which branched off from each other almost 420 million years ago [21]. They present a complex immune system, exhibiting one of the greatest functional diversities when compared to other vertebrates [22]. Screening for pathogen communities in cartilaginous fish hosts has been mostly opportunistic and descriptive, and has not covered the taxonomic and ecological diversity of the group. While only a few viruses have been isolated from cartilaginous fish taxa, the few data available show extensive retroviral diversity in the elephant shark (Callorhinchus milii) genome [23], and newly identified RNA and double stranded DNA (dsDNA) viruses in shark and ray species [13, 24,25,26,27,28,29,30].

Here, as part of an ongoing study aiming to provide a baseline data of the viruses associated with various cartilaginous fish with different ecologies, we report the identification of a complete polyomavirus genome from the thornback skate, Raja clavata, a coastal benthic elasmobranch from the order Rajiformes.

Materials and methods

Sampling

A total of ten Raja clavata individuals were collected during the Nephrops Survey Offshore Portugal survey (NepS (FU 28–29)) in June/July 2021 in R/V Mário Ruivo. This survey has been conducted yearly by the Portuguese Institute for the Sea and Atmosphere (IPMA), during the 2nd quarter (May-July), under the EU/DGMARE Fisheries’ Data Collection Framework (DCF), with the aim of monitoring the abundance and distribution of the main crustacean species, namely Nephrops norvegicus (Norway lobster), Parapenaeus longirostris (deepwater rose shrimp) and Aristeus antennatus (red shrimp) (ICES, 2016). The survey design follows a grid that covers the main crustacean fishing grounds in southwest and south coasts within the depth range of 200–750 m (ICES, 2022). The hauls are carried out during daytime at an average speed of 3.2 knots and the duration of each tow is 30 min.

DNA extraction, Illumina sequencing and data processing

DNA was extracted from the spleen tissue from each of the ten Raja clavata. Briefly, approximately of 12 mg of tissue was homogenized with 300 µl of SM buffer (0.1 M NaCl, 50 mM Tris/HCl-pH 7.4, 10 mM MgSO4) and disrupted using a bioruptor. The homogenized sample was centrifuged at 10.000 rpm for 2 min and 200 µl of the supernatant was used to isolate viral DNA using the High Pure Viral Nucleic Acid Kit (Roche Diagnostic, USA), according to manufacturer’s specifications. The extracted viral nucleic acid was then enriched for circular DNA molecules using the rolling circle amplification (RCA) reaction with the TempliPhi™ kit (GE Healthcare, USA). The products from RCA were quantified using Qubit™ dsDNA HS Assay kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA), pooled equimolarly, and sent to Macrogen Inc. (Korea) for library preparation (Nextera DNA XT) and sequencing on an Illumina Novaseq 6000. Following Illumina sequencing, the resulting pair-end-reads were trimmed using Trimmomatic [31], host genome sequences were removed using the RefSeq genome of the Rajiform Amblyraja radiata available at NCBI (RefSeq accession number GCF_010909765.2) as a reference with Bowtie2 [32]. The remaining reads were de novo assembled using Megahit v1.2.9 [33].

Identification of viral genomes

The de novo assembled contigs were, in a first step, examined for putative viral matches using Diamond [34] against the NCBI RefSeq Virus database coupled with Cenote-Taker 2 [35]. The putative viral contigs with > 500 nucleotides in length and e-value ≤ 10− 5 were further analyzed with NCBI BLASTx/BLASTn searches against the refseq_protein and the nucleotide collection (nr/nt) databases, respectively.

Viral genome analysis

Annotated fish and arachnids polyomavirus sequences were downloaded on March 2023 from https://ccrod.cancer.gov/confluence/display/LCOTF/Polyomavirus and were aligned using MAFFT under the algorithm L-INS-i [36].

RcPyV1 putative accessory proteins were annotated using Geneious software version 11.0.18 (https://www.geneious.com), by searching the genomic sequence for ORFs of at least 25 codons.

Pairwise nucleotide divergence calculations were performed for the two polyomaviruses isolated from cartilaginous fishes (GfPyV1 and RcPyV1) using the Sequence Demarcation Tool (SDT) version 1.2 in MUSCLE mode [37].

Recombination analysis

The alignment was screened for recombination using RDP5 [38] with default settings. Only events with an associated p-value < 0.05 detected by three or more recombination detection methods implemented in RDP5 were accepted as plausible evidence of recombination.

Phylogenetic analysis

The final dataset for the phylogenetic analysis included the polyomavirus identified in this study (RcPyV1) and the annotated polyomavirus sequences from fishes and arachnids retrieved from https://ccrod.cancer.gov/confluence/display/LCOTF/Polyomavirus. A total of nine protein sequences for LT and VP1 were aligned using the L-INS-i algorithm on MAFFT [36]. There were a total of 973 positions for LT and 895 positions for VP1 in the final aligned dataset. Maximum likelihood (ML) phylogenetic trees for LT and VP1 proteins were constructed using MEGAX [39]. The rtREV + G + I + F and WAG + G were used as the best-fit amino acid model for LT and VP1, respectively, as determined by MEGAX using ML as statistical method and the Bayesian information criterion as measure, and 1000 bootstrap replicates. The final ML trees were rooted on the arachnids clade.

Results

Polyomavirus genome analysis

A full genomic sequence of 4,195 nts was de novo assembled from the short read data. This genome has similarities to other polyomaviruses. Thus, based on the recommendation by the ICTV Polyomaviridae study group [40], the isolated viral genome was named Raja clavata polyomavirus 1 (RcPyV1, accession number OR159679). RcPyV1 presents the typical genomic organization of polyomaviruses (Fig. 1; Table 1), including the LT and sT antigen genes of the early region in one strand, and the VP1 and VP2 genes of the late region on the opposite strand.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Genomic organization of the Raja clavata polyomavirus (RcPyV1). The size of the genome is indicated in base pairs (bp). The predicted small T antigen (sT) appears in pink, the Large T antigen (LT) is in red, the predicted major capsid protein (VP1) is in blue and the minor capsid protein (VP2) is in green. Additional ORFs of potential interest are indicated in light gray, and the Duo protein is in orange

Full size image
Table 1 Predicted coding regions of RcPyV.
Full size table

The predicted LT antigen (1,806 nts; 602 aa) is encoded by a single ORF and contains several conserved motifs [41] such as the polyomavirus conserved region 1 (CR1) motif (LQKLL), N-terminal Dna J-like motif (HPDKGG), zinc binding domain (CVLCKEDKVHSETH) and the helicase domain with ATPase motifs (GPYNSGKT and GLCPVGLE) (Fig. 1 and Table 1). The putative sT antigen-like (132 nts; 44 aa) was identified 5’ of LT antigen; however, none of its conserved motifs were found and the BLAST searches retrieved no hit to any proteins in GenBank.

The predicted VP1 protein, which is the major structural protein (1952 nts; 328 aa), and the predicted VP2 protein (1030 nts; 269 aa) overlap by 62 nts, and VP2 encodes a predicted N-terminal myristoylation sequence (MGAALAV). We also identified the Duo protein (324 nts; https://ccrod.cancer.gov/confluence/display/LCOTF/Polyomavirus) and other ORFs of potential interest (Fig. 1; Table 2). Yet, we were not able to identify the regulatory Agnoprotein detected in the genome of the close relative giant guitarfish polyomavirus 1 (GfPyV1)[1].

Pairwise comparisons of fish polyomaviruses using SDT showed that PyVs from the two cartilaginous fish share 55.8% and 56.0% of protein identity in LT and VP1 proteins, respectively, (Fig. 2). Among the other encoded viral proteins, the protein identities are lower (22.5% for sT, 38.2% for VP2 and 44.6% in DUO protein). When comparing cartilaginous fishes to perciform fish or arachnids, pairwise identities are lower (26.1–30.1% and 26.1–28.9%, respectively for LT and 25.8–31.2% and 22–26% for VP1, respectively).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Percent identity between large T antigen (a) and VP1 (b) amino acid sequences of polyomaviruses from fish and arachnids. The figure was generated using SDT Virus Classification Tool

Full size image
Table 2 Conserved motifs identified in predicted proteins of RcPyV.
Full size table

Phylogenetic analysis

There were no recombination events detected between fish polyomaviruses. Maximum likelihood phylogenetic trees were constructed from LT (Fig. 3a) and VP1 (Fig. 3b) amino acid sequences and both phylogenetic trees show that GfPyV1 and RcPyV1 cluster together in a specific lineage, reflecting the host topology.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Maximum-likelihood phylogenetic trees of the (a) LT antigen and (b) VP1.

Full size image

Discussion

Polyomavirus genomes range from 3962 to 7369 nts, with the smallest PyV being identified in a cartilaginous fish, the giant guitarfish (Rhynchobatus djiddensis) [13]. The R. clavata polyomavirus reported here, RcPyV1, has a 4,195 nt-long genome, being the second smallest polyomavirus described to date.

Similar to other polyomaviruses, the RcPyV1 genome contains CDS homologous to sT, LT, VP1, VP2 and DUO encoding proteins (Fig. 1; Table 1). When compared with GfPyV1 [1], RcPyV1 lacks the Agnoprotein. The predicted sT antigen seems to be smaller (132 bp; 44aa) when compared to other vertebrates and, like in GfPyV1 [13], it does not contain any conserved motif. Previous studies on fish polyomaviruses indicates that sT usually presents the DnaJ motif while the remaining ORF show no similarity among sequences [14]. This is in agreement with our BLAST search results that revealed that RcPyV1 VP1 has no sequence identity to known proteins. In turn, the LT antigen, known to be crucial for viral replication [8], presents all the other conserved motifs described for polyomaviruses, with the exception of the retinoblastoma protein binding motif (pRB) which is specific to amniote polyomaviruses, and the protein phosphate 2 A (Fig. 1; Table 2). Within LT, we identified the CR1 motif (LQKLL), important for transcriptional regulation [42], the hexapeptide (HPDKGG) involved in protein interactions, the putative nuclear localization signal (PRRSIN), the zinc-finger motif (CVLCKEDKVHSETH) and ATPase motifs (GPYNSGKT and GLCPVGLE), which are important to recruit cellular proteins involved in replication [43].

Additional ORFs of potential interest were detected. These include the putative ORF1 that presents the LxCxE motif (LHCYE), the putative ORF2 and DUO protein. DUO protein has been identified in mammals, birds, fishes and aracnids (https://ccrod.cancer.gov/confluence/display/LCOTF/Polyomavirus), however its function and importance is still unkown.

According to ICTV Polyomavirdae study group recommendations for the classification of polyomaviruses, polyomaviruses that share < 85% pairwise identity in the LT antigen should be considered as a separate species [40]. The LT antigen sequences from the two cartilaginous fish share 56% identity and thus GfPyV1 and RcPyV1 represent members of two different species of polyomaviruses. However, fish polyomaviruses have not yet been assigned to a genus [15].

No signs of infection were detected in the collected samples, however, since this virus was detected in the spleen, it is likely that RcPyV1 is not a contaminant from the environment, but rather a virus infecting the thornback skate. This is also supported by the previous identification of GfPyV1 in the giant guitarfish [13], which is phylogenetically related to RcPyV1.

It has been proposed that polyomaviruses evolution is driven by their hosts, although they often show higher among-sequence divergence levels compared to those of their hosts suggesting that other factors contribute to their evolution [1, 9]. Previous analysis [14] suggested that fish polyomaviruses are divided in two lineages: one lineage clustering viral genomes isolated from perciform fish and lacking the DnaJ domain, and the other lineage grouping viral genomes isolated from cartilaginous fish exhibiting the DnaJ domain. Our results are in line with these observations as in both phylogenetic trees, GfPyV1 and RcPyV1 cluster together, but separately from the remaining perciform fish PyVs. Recombination, which plays an important role in the evolution of PyVs [1, 14], was not found in the GfPyV1 and RcPyV1.

In conclusion, we identified a novel polyomavirus from the cartilaginous fish Raja clavata, which presents the typical features of polyomaviruses: LT with conserved motifs, sT, VP1 and VP2 proteins. RcPyV1 belongs to the same evolutionary lineage as the previously identified GfPyV1, reinforcing that Perciform and cartilaginous fish PyVs are not monophyletic, but rather represent two divergent groups. The pairwise comparisons between RcPyV1 and GfPyV1 and the remaining fish PyVs are in line with this.

Data Availability

The sequence reported here is available in NCBI with the accession number OR159679.

References

  1. Buck CB, Van Doorslaer K, Peretti A, Geoghegan EM, Tisza MJ, An P, Katz JP, Pipas JM, McBride AA, Camus AC, McDermott AJ, Dill JA, Delwart E, Ng TF, Farkas K, Austin C, Kraberger S, Davison W, Pastrana DV, Varsani A. The ancient evolutionary history of polyomaviruses. PLoS Pathog. 2016;12:e1005574.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Moens U, Calvignac-Spencer S, Lauber C, Ramqvist T, Feltkamp MCW, Daugherty MD, Verschoor EJ, Ehlers B, Report I, C. ICTV Virus Taxonomy Profile: Polyomaviridae. J Gen Virol. 2017;98:1159–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Zou W, Imperiale MJ. Biology of Polyomavirus miRNA. Front Microbiol. 2021;12:662892.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Saribas AS, Coric P, Bouaziz S, Safak M. Expression of novel proteins by polyomaviruses and recent advances in the structural and functional features of agnoprotein of JC virus, BK virus, and simian virus 40. J Cell Physiol. 2019;234:8295–315.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Daniels R, Sadowicz D, Hebert DN. A very late viral protein triggers the lytic release of SV40. PLoS Pathog. 2007;3:928–38.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Carter JJ, Daugherty MD, Qi XJ, Bheda-Malge A, Wipf GC, Robinson K, Roman A, Malik HS, Galloway DA. Identification of an overprinting gene in Merkel cell polyomavirus provides evolutionary insight into the birth of viral genes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2013;110:12744–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Frisque RJ, Bream GL, Cannella MT. Human Polyomavirus Jc-Virus Genome. J Virol. 1984;51:458–69.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. DeCaprio JA, Garcea RL. A cornucopia of human polyomaviruses. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2013;11:264–76.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Dunowska M, Perrott M, Biggs P. Identification of a novel polyomavirus from a marsupial host. Virus Evol. 2022;8:veac096.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Garren SB, Kondaveeti Y, Duff MO, Carmichael GG. 2015. Global analysis of mouse polyomavirus infection reveals dynamic regulation of viral and host gene expression and promiscuous viral RNA editing. PLoS Pathog 11, e1005166.

  11. Tao Y, Shi M, Conrardy C, Kuzmin IV, Recuenco S, Agwanda B, Alvarez DA, Ellison JA, Gilbert AT, Moran D, Niezgoda M, Lindblade KA, Holmes EC, Breiman RF, Rupprecht CE, Tong S. Discovery of diverse polyomaviruses in bats and the evolutionary history of the Polyomaviridae. J Gen Virol. 2013;94:738–48.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Kaszab E, Marton S, Erdelyi K, Banyai K, Feher E. Genomic evolution of avian polyomaviruses with a focus on budgerigar fledgling disease virus. Infect Genet evolution: J Mol Epidemiol evolutionary Genet Infect Dis. 2021;90:104762.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Dill JA, Ng TF, Camus AC. 2016. Complete sequence of the Smallest Polyomavirus Genome, Giant Guitarfish (Rhynchobatus djiddensis) polyomavirus 1. Genome announcements 4.

  14. Van Doorslaer K, Kraberger S, Austin C, Farkas K, Bergeman M, Paunil E, Davison W, Varsani A. Fish polyomaviruses belong to two distinct evolutionary lineages. J Gen Virol. 2018;99:567–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Schmidlin K, Kraberger S, Cook C, DeNardo DF, Fontenele RS, Van Doorslaer K, Martin DP, Buck CB, Varsani A. A novel lineage of polyomaviruses identified in bark scorpions. Virology. 2021;563:58–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Peretti A, FitzGerald PC, Bliskovsky V, Pastrana DV, Buck CB. 2015. Genome sequence of a Fish-Associated Polyomavirus, Black Sea Bass (Centropristis striata) Polyomavirus 1. Genome announcements 3.

  17. Lopez-Bueno A, Mavian C, Labella AM, Castro D, Borrego JJ, Alcami A, Alejo A. Concurrence of Iridovirus, Polyomavirus, and a Unique Member of a New Group of Fish Papillomaviruses in Lymphocystis Disease-Affected Gilthead Sea Bream. J Virol. 2016;90:8768–79.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Mizutani T, Sayama Y, Nakanishi A, Ochiai H, Sakai K, Wakabayashi K, Tanaka N, Miura E, Oba M, Kurane I, Saijo M, Morikawa S, Ono S. Novel DNA virus isolated from samples showing endothelial cell necrosis in the japanese eel, Anguilla japonica. Virology. 2011;412:179–87.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Okazaki S, Yasumoto S, Koyama S, Tsuchiaka S, Naoi Y, Omatsu T, Ono S, Mizutani T. Detection of japanese eel endothelial cells-infecting virus in Anguilla japonica elvers. J Vet Med Sci. 2016;78:705–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Wen CM, Chen MM, Wang CS, Liu PC, Nan FH. Isolation of a novel polyomavirus, related to japanese eel endothelial cell-infecting virus, from marbled eels, Anguilla marmorata (Quoy & Gaimard). J Fish Dis. 2016;39:889–97.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Heinicke MP, Naylor GJP, Hedges SB. Cartilaginous fishes (Chondrichthyes), Oxford biology. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Flajnik MF. A cold-blooded view of adaptive immunity. Nat Rev Immunol. 2018;18:438–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Han GZ. Extensive retroviral diversity in shark. Retrovirology. 2015;12:34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Armwood AR, Stilwell JM, Ng TFF, Clauss TM, Leary JH, Mader D, Camus AC. A novel herpes-like virus inducing branchial lesions in a tiger shark (Galeocerdo cuvier). Vet Pathol. 2022;59:348–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Camus A, Dill J, McDermott A, Camus M, Ng F, T.F. Virus-associated papillomatous skin lesions in a giant guitarfish Rhynchobatus djiddensis: a case report. Dis Aquat Organ. 2016;117:253–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Dill JA, Camus AC, Leary JH, Ng TFF. 2018. Microscopic and Molecular Evidence of the First Elasmobranch Adomavirus, the Cause of Skin Disease in a Giant Guitarfish, Rhynchobatus djiddensis. mBio 9.

  27. Garner MM. A retrospective study of disease in elasmobranchs. Vet Pathol. 2013;50:377–89.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Hesse RD, Roach M, Kerr EN, Papudeshi B, Lima LFO, Goodman AZ, Hoopes L, Scott M, Meyer L, Huveneers C, Dinsdale EA. 2022. Phage Diving: An Exploration of the Carcharhinid Shark Epidermal Virome. Viruses 14.

  29. Leibovitz L, Lebouitz SS. A viral dermatitis of the smooth Dogfish, Mustelus-Canis (Mitchill). J Fish Dis. 1985;8:273–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Shi M, Lin XD, Chen X, Tian JH, Chen LJ, Li K, Wang W, Eden JS, Shen JJ, Liu L, Holmes EC, Zhang YZ. The evolutionary history of vertebrate RNA viruses. Nature. 2018;556:197–202.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics. 2014;30:2114–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Langmead B, Salzberg SL. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat Methods. 2012;9:357–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Li D, Luo R, Liu CM, Leung CM, Ting HF, Sadakane K, Yamashita H, Lam TW. MEGAHIT v1.0: a fast and scalable metagenome assembler driven by advanced methodologies and community practices. Methods. 2016;102:3–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Buchfink B, Xie C, Huson DH. Fast and sensitive protein alignment using DIAMOND. Nat Methods. 2015;12:59–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Tisza MJ, Belford AK, Dominguez-Huerta G, Bolduc B, Buck CB. 2021. Cenote-Taker 2 democratizes virus discovery and sequence annotation. Virus Evol 7.

  36. Katoh K, Misawa K, Kuma K, Miyata T. MAFFT: a novel method for rapid multiple sequence alignment based on fast Fourier transform. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002;30:3059–66.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Muhire BM, Varsani A, Martin DP. 2014. SDT: a virus classification tool based on pairwise sequence alignment and identity calculation. PLoS ONE 9, e108277.

  38. Martin DP, Varsani A, Roumagnac P, Botha G, Maslamoney S, Schwab T, Kelz Z, Kumar V, Murrell B. RDP5: a computer program for analyzing recombination in, and removing signals of recombination from, nucleotide sequence datasets. Virus Evol. 2021;7:veaa087.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Kumar S, Stecher G, Li M, Knyaz C, Tamura K. MEGA X: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis across Computing Platforms. Mol Biol Evol. 2018;35:1547–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Calvignac-Spencer S, Feltkamp MCW, Daugherty MD, Moens U, Ramqvist T, Johne R, Ehlers B, Viruses ICT. A taxonomy update for the family Polyomaviridae. Arch Virol. 2016;161:1739–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. An P, Saenz Robles MT, Pipas JM. Large T antigens of polyomaviruses: amazing molecular machines. Annu Rev Microbiol. 2012;66:213–36.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Plevin MJ, Mills MM, Ikura M. The LxxLL motif: a multifunctional binding sequence in transcriptional regulation. Trends Biochem Sci. 2005;30:66–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. An P, Brodsky JL, Pipas JM. The conserved core enzymatic activities and the distinct dynamics of polyomavirus large T antigens. Arch Biochem Biophys. 2015;573:23–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the Portuguese Biological Sampling Program from the EU Data Collection Framework (PNAB/DCF), specifically the scientific team at RV Mario Ruivo for helping in sample collection at the Portuguese crustacean survey.

Funding

This work was supported via national funds through FCT - Foundation for Science and Technology, under the project EXPL/BIA-EVL/1045/2021. FCT also supported the project UIDP/50027/2020. The authors also acknowledge the research support via the project NORTE-01-0246-FEDER-000063, supported by Norte Portugal Regional Operational Programme (NORTE2020), under the PORTUGAL 2020 Partnership Agreement, through the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF). P.P. was supported by Portuguese funds through Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology grant PD/BD/128492/2017.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. CIBIO-InBIO, Research Center in Biodiversity and Genetic Resources, University of Porto, Vairão, 4485-661, Portugal

    Joana Abrantes, Paulo Pereira, Inês Farias, Ana Veríssimo & Fabiana Neves

  2. BIOPOLIS Program in Genomics, Biodiversity and Land Planning, CIBIO, Campus de Vairão, Vairão, 4485-661, Portugal

    Joana Abrantes, Paulo Pereira, Ana Veríssimo & Fabiana Neves

  3. Department of Biology, Faculty of Sciences, University of Porto, Porto, 4169-007, Portugal

    Joana Abrantes

  4. The Biodesign Center for Fundamental and Applied Microbiomics, Center for Evolution and Medicine, School of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA

    Arvind Varsani

  5. Structural Biology Research Unit, Department of Integrative, Biomedical Sciences, University of Cape Town, Observatory, Cape Town, 7925, South Africa

    Arvind Varsani

  6. Portuguese Institute for Sea and Atmosphere, Division of Modelling and Management of Fisheries Resources, Alges, 1495-165, Portugal

    Catarina Maia

Authors
  1. Joana Abrantes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Arvind Varsani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Paulo Pereira
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Catarina Maia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Inês Farias
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Ana Veríssimo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Fabiana Neves
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

FN designed this study. CM and IF collected the samples. FN conducted the laboratory work. FN, AVarsani, AVeríssimo, and PP performed the bioinformatics analysis and prepared the figures and tables. FN and JA drafted the manuscript, and all authors reviewed and edited the manuscript. All the authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fabiana Neves.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Abrantes, J., Varsani, A., Pereira, P. et al. Identification and characterization of a polyomavirus in the thornback skate (Raja clavata). Virol J 20, 190 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12985-023-02149-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12985-023-02149-1

Keywords

Virology Journal

ISSN: 1743-422X