Skip to main content

Discovery of vaccine-like recombinant SARS-CoV-2 circulating in human

Abstract

For viral diseases, vaccination with live attenuated vaccine (LAV) is one of the most effective means for fighting the diseases. However, LAV occasionally overflows from vaccinated individuals circulate in the population with unforeseen consequences. Currently, SARS-CoV-2 LAVs are undergoing clinical trials. In this study, we found that the viruses isolated from Indian SARS CoV-2 infected persons may be candidate LAV-derived strains, indicating the risk of SARS-CoV-2 LAV spillover from vaccinated persons, increasing the complexity of SARS-CoV-2 detection. In addition, the property of frequent recombination of SARS-CoV-2 increases the chance of LAV virulence reversion. Therefore, how to distinguish the LAV viruses from the wild strain and how to avoid the recombination of the circulating vaccine strain and the wild strain are the challenges currently faced by SARS CoV-2 LAV development.

Introduction

Since the outbreak at the end of 2019, the novel coronavirus pneumonia (COVID-19) has continued to rage around the world, seriously endangering human health and life. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), as of May 30, 2022, more than 520 million people have suffered from the disease, with over 6.28 million deaths (https://covid19.who.int/). Moreover, these numbers keep growing. Its pathogen is acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), which belongs to the genus Betacoronavirus of the family Coronaviridae [314]. The genome of SARS-CoV-2 is positive sense single-stranded RNA up to 30,000 nucleotides, encoding a complex system of structural and non-structural proteins [30], such as spike protein (S), envelope protein (E), nucleocapsid protein (N), and RNA polymerase [1]. Of them, the S protein, exposed on the surface of the virion, is responsible for binding the receptor protein, angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2), and mediates the entry of the virus into the host cell after being cleaved into S1 and S2 by the Furin enzyme of the host cell [23]. In addition, S protein is also the protective antigen of SARS-CoV-2, which can induce the host to produce neutralizing antibodies and terminate its replication of in the host [5].

Vaccination remains the primary means of controlling COVID-19 although different measures are being developed to prevent and treat the pandemic. So far, a large number of vaccines have been used in clinical or are being developed, including inactivated and live attenuated vaccines, recombinant protein vaccines or recombinant subunit vaccines, nucleoid vaccines, and viral vector vaccines. Li and his colleagues reviewed the research progress of these vaccines [15]. An ideal SARS-CoV-2 vaccine should: elicit strong humoral and cellular immune responses; have equipment that is easy to store and transport; and be affordable for all countries, especially low- and middle-income countries. Although various SARS-CoV-2 vaccines have been extensively studied and used [21], rapid antigenic drift and epitope loss greatly compromises their effectiveness [25]. SARS-CoV-2 live attenuated vaccines (LAV) still have their unique advantages: activate all types of host immune responses (cellular, humoral and innate); present all epitopes to the host immune cells, thereby inducing a broad host immune response and avoiding the immune escape caused by antigenic drift as much as possible; and have relatively low storage, transportation and immune costs [4619]. These advantages make LAV especially suitable for less developed regions and countries. Therefore, vaccine research institutions in different countries, including India and the United States (US), are adopting various strategies to construct SARS-CoV-2 LAV [21]. In July 2021, a group from the US reported the efficacy and safety of a candidate SARS-CoV-2 LAV constructed through a deoptimization strategy [28]. In the spike (S) protein gene of this strain, besides the deletion of the segment encoding for the furin cleavage site, 283 point mutations were introduced. Although these artificial mutations did not change the amino acid sequence, the variant is highly attenuated. Its antigen epitope is a perfect match to that of the circulating wild-type (WT) strain, providing the capacity for a broad immune response and making the vaccine more likely to retain efficacy. In Vero E6 cells, COVI-VAC is temperature sensitive and has high replication titer. After COVI-VAC vaccination, Syrian golden hamsters did not show significant pathological changes. In vitro, the sera of immunized hamsters could neutralize the WT virus. In vivo, when hamsters were challenged with the WT virus, COVI-VAC vaccination reduced viral titers in the lung, rendered the virus undetectable in the brain, and protected hamsters from almost all virus-associated weight loss. Moreover, a single intranasal dose could provide enough protection for the inoculated animals. These advantages endow COVI-VAC with the promise of mass vaccination. Groups from many countries have also reported their progress in the research of LAV [162426].

As a pathogen that is prone to homologous recombination between viruses [121327], SARS-CoV-2 LAV virus spilled from the vaccinated population into the environment will inevitably recombine with circulating strains, resulting in new circulating strains with unpredictable consequences. Therefore, knowing whether LAV spill over into the environment from vaccinated individuals is an essential for the safety assessment of LAV. So far, there have been no reports in this regard. India, one of the largest developing countries, is conducting research on LAV [21]. Therefore, in this study, we analyzed the genome sequences of SARS-CoV-2 isolated from infected persons in India before July 2021 in the SARS-CoV-2 databases, to explore the possibility of spillover of LAV so as to provide references for the study of LAV.

Materials and methods

Virus sequences

From the SARS-CoV-2 database of GenBank or GISAID, we collected the genome sequences of 1643 SARS-CoV-2 isolated from infected individuals in India before August 2021. With the help of the MUSCLE program in the MEGA X software package [11], sequence alignments were performed on these sequences, and the optimized alignment results were finally obtained for subsequent analysis.

Recombination analysis

In order to determine whether there is some viruses undergoing genetic recombination in their genome, the recombination analysis software RDP 3.0 [20] was used to analyze the above processed data set to preliminarily screen recombinant sequences. And then, the SimPlot program [18] was used to visualize the genomic sequence similarity between the putative recombinant and their potential parental virus so as to further determine the reliability of the recombination signal.

Phylogenetic analysis

To determine the phylogeny of viruses with recombinant signals, we downloaded the LAV strain and other reference viruses of different genotypes from the SARS-CoV-2 database (Table 1) and analyzed their phylogenetic history. Before the phylogenetic reconstruction, the nucleotide substitution model selection tool MODELS in the phylogenetic analysis software package MEGA X [11] was used to find the optimal substitution model, and then, the maximum likelihood method was used to reconstruct phylogenetic history employing the optimal substitution model. The robustness of the most recent common ancestor of each phylogenetic branch was determined by the bootstrap method of 1000 replications, and the bootstrap value > 70% was regarded as robustness.

Table 1 Representative isolates analyzed in this study

Results and discussion

Analysis of more than 1600 isolates from India revealed two isolates with significant recombination signals. In the detection results of RDP, five methods, GENECONV, MaxChi, Chimaera, SiScan, 3Seq gave significant recombination positive signals (p < 0.01) (Table 2), and it was inferred that the recombination region was located within the S gene.

Table 2 Results of recombination detection

The two viruses with the recombination signal were isolated from two infected peoples on June 30, 2020. After removing the ambiguous bases, their genome sequences had 99.99% similarity, with only four bases different in the S gene (Fig. 1A). Comparing their genome sequences with the wild strains Wuhan-Hu-1 and HKU-SZ-005b isolated early in the virus outbreak, the two Indian isolates were almost identical (> 99.9%) to the two reference virus sequences except for the S gene. However, in the local region of the S gene, their similarity was less than 90% (Fig. 1B). This highly variable region is located in the S2 coding region (Fig. 1B). According to the evolution rate of SARS-CoV-2, the annual substitution rate of each site of the S gene is about 5.7 × 10− 4 [8]. Therefore, if the variation is caused by natural mutation, the S gene of these two Indian isolates might differ from other SARS-CoV-2 isolates by up to 3–4 bases at most. It means that the parent virus that can provide the S2 region for these two Indian isolates may not exist in nature. Therefore, the putative recombination regions on the genomes of the two Indian isolates should not originate from the recombination between SARS-CoV-2 circulating in nature, but are more likely to be the product of genetic engineering.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Comparison of genome sequence similarity between two Indian SARS-CoV-2s and the reference strains. A Genomic sequence comparison between two Indian isolates. The vertical axis is the sequence similarity between the viruses, and the horizontal axis is the corresponding position in the viral genome. The query sequence used for the comparison is the isolate 5844. B Comparison of genome sequence between the isolate 5844 and the reference strains Wuhan-Hu-1 and HKU-SZ-005b. The coding regions of the virus genome are shown with different colors, NSPS, non-structural protein, SPS, structural protein. The arrow points to the hydrolysis site of Furin enzyme

The substituted codon signature also indicated that the S2 region of these two Indian isolates was the product of artificial editing. We analyzed the substitution sites in S2 region of the isolate 5844 and found that after removal of ambiguous bases, there were nucleotide substitutions in codons of approximately 90 amino acids compared to the earliest SARS-CoV-2 isolate, Wuhan-Hu-1. Interestingly, although substitutions also appeared in the first position of very few codons, almost all substitutions occurred in the third position of these codons. Interestingly, all these substitutions took place between synonymous codons and did not change any amino acids of the S protein (Fig. 2). This regular substitution rule is significantly different from the natural mutation in S gene of SARS-CoV-2, and is more in line with LAV constructed by genetic recombination after artificial editing of the S2 region.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Comparison of amino acids (top) and codons (bottom) in the S2 region of Indian isolate 5844 and Wuhan-Hu-1. All ambiguous bases have been removed prior to sequence comparison, resulting in a final comparison of 78 codons (red) and their encoded amino acids (blue)

Based on the above analysis, the two Indian SARS-CoV-2s are likely to be resulted from the spillover of LAV, rather than the product of natural recombination between circulating viruses. To test this hypothesis, using the S2 region of the isolate 5844 as the query sequence, we searched the SARS-CoV-2 database in GenBank to find the virus with the highest genomic similarity to them. It was found that the genomic sequence of the candidate LAV COVI-VAC, which was undergoing phase I clinical trials, had up to 99.6% similarity of the query virus. Until June 2022, with the exception of the vaccine strain COVI-VAC, we have not found any wild circulating strains that are more than 95% similar to the two India isolates in this region (Fig. 3A). This also suggested that the orthologous S gene of them was unlikely to have arisen through natural evolution of SARS-CoV-2. Further comparing the whole genomic sequence of the isolate 5844 with that of COVI-VAC, we found that their differences were in the S2 region, with a substitution of the total of 21 bases, while other regions had almost no changes. It was also noticed that, unlike Isolate_5844, the Furin enzyme cleavage site of COVI-VAC was missing (Fig. 3B). These results indicated that the two Indian strains might not be directly derived from COVI-VAC.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Sequence comparison between the Indian isolate 5844 and its homologous viruses. A Result of BLAST analysis performed in GenBank using the S2 region of the Indian isolate 5844 as the query (BLAST was performed on June 10, 2022). Sequence similarity between the isolate 5844 and other viruses was indicated by a red box. B Genome sequence comparison of the Indian isolate 5844 with the live attenuated vaccine strain COVI-VAC. The vertical axis is the sequence similarity between viruses, the horizontal axis is the position of the virus genome, and the query sequence used for comparison is the isolate 5844

To demonstrate that these two Indian SARS-CoV-2 isolates may be live attenuated vaccine-derived strains, we reconstructed their phylogenetic histories. Phylogenetically, regardless of the S2 region of the genome or other regions, these two Indian isolates and the candidate LAV COVI-VAC formed a monophyletic group (Fig. 4), supporting that they should be spillover vaccine strains.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Phylogenetic histories of different regions of the genome of the two Indian isolates. A Phylogenetic tree inferred from positions 1-24105 of the SARS-CoV-2 genome; B Phylogenetic tree inferred from positions 24,106–25,300 (S2 region) of the SARS-CoV-2 genome. LAV, live attenuated vaccine; WT wild-type viruses

Although we cannot determine their real parents yet, the above results showed that the two SARS-CoV-2 isolates from India might be derived from the LAV candidate strains. Moreover, their S gene is most likely the product of genetic engineering after codon deoptimization. Fortunately, apart from these two Indian viruses, we have not found any more circulating viruses homologous to them in the SARS-CoV-2 databases so far, suggesting that these LAV-derived viruses have not spread widely among the population.

Before July 2021, LAVs were still at stages of laboratory research or phase I clinical trials [21]. The two Indian isolates were collected in June 2020, indicating that they may be the viruses spilled out during animal or clinical trials of LAVs, or resulted from outflow of laboratories. This finding suggested that there was a risk of spillover of LAVs into the environment, and therefore, may have some unpredictable consequences for SARS-CoV-2 control. The immediate impact will be to complicate SARS-CoV-2 surveillance. According to WHO recommendations, a positive real-time PCR result of viral nucleic acid test is the gold standard for determining whether someone is infected by SARS-CoV-2. However, if peoples are infected by the spilled LAV, they will also be test positive of nucleic acid, making it difficult to determine whether they are patients infected by wild SARS-CoV-2. Therefore, how to distinguish vaccine strains circulating in the environment from wild strains is one of the challenges faced by SARS-CoV-2 LAV development. In this sense, the construction of LAVs with gene deletion may be a good option to solve this problem.

Another issue posed by the spillover of LAVs is how to avoid reversion of the virulence of vaccine strains circulating in the environment. Theoretically, due to the use of multiple point mutations during the construction of LAVs, it is unlikely that SARS-CoV-2 will be resulted in virulence reversion through gene mutation. However, homologous recombination among viruses is the intrinsic genetic mechanism by which SARS-CoV-2 evolves rapidly [2172227]. If homologous recombination occurs between wild viruses and vaccine strains circulating in the environment, there will be some unpredictable consequences. One lesson comes from the WHO Global Polio Eradication Program. Through the coverage of large-scale oral poliovirus vaccine, the global control of poliomyelitis has achieved good results, and almost completed the WHO goal of eradicating wild poliovirus [729]. Unfortunately, over the course of several years in the early 2000s, Africa saw several outbreaks of polio associated with attenuated vaccination [10]. After in-depth research, it was found that these outbreaks were caused by the reversion of vaccine virulence because of the recombination of the spillover LAV with enteroviruses [9], which seriously interferes with the polio eradication plan. Therefore, how to avoid vaccine virus spillover and recombine with wild coronaviruses is also an issue that must be considered in the development of SARS-CoV-2 LAVs.

In conclusion, this study found that there might be some LAV-like strains among the SARS-CoV-2 strains circulating in the Indian population. In the phylogenetic trees inferred from different regions of the genome, they fall into the LAV lineage, and thus may be result from spillover of LAV. This finding suggests the risk of loss of live attenuated vaccines from vaccinated individuals into the environment, thereby increasing the complexity of SARS-CoV-2 control. In addition, recombination of attenuated vaccines with wild viruses may also have unforeseen consequences. Therefore, how to avoid recombination between vaccines circulating in the environment and wild strains is an important challenge during the research of LAVs.

Availability of data and materials

The data will be shared on a reasonable request to the corresponding author.

References

  1. Alanagreh L, Alzoughool F, Atoum M. The human coronavirus disease COVID-19: its origin, characteristics, and insights into potential drugs and its mechanisms. Pathogens. 2020;9:331.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Amoutzias GD, Nikolaidis M, Tryfonopoulou E, Chlichlia K, Markoulatos P, Oliver SG. The remarkable evolutionary plasticity of Coronaviruses by Mutation and recombination: insights for the COVID-19 pandemic and the future evolutionary paths of SARS-CoV-2. Viruses. 2022;14:78.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Bao Y, Sun Y, Meng S, Shi J, Lu L. 2019-nCoV epidemic: address mental health care to empower society. Lancet. 2020;395:e37-8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Dumonteil E, Herrera C. Polymorphism and selection pressure of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine and diagnostic antigens: implications for immune evasion and serologic diagnostic performance. Pathogens. 2020;9:584.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Golawski M, Lewandowski P, Jablonska I, Delijewski M. The reassessed potential of SARS-CoV-2 attenuation for COVID-19 Vaccine Development-A systematic review. Viruses. 2022;14:991.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Grifoni A, Weiskopf D, Ramirez SI, Mateus J, Dan JM, Moderbacher CR, Rawlings SA, Sutherland A, Premkumar L, Jadi RS, Marrama D, de Silva AM, Frazier A, Carlin AF, Greenbaum JA, Peters B, Krammer F, Smith DM, Crotty S, Sette A. Targets of T cell responses to SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus in humans with COVID-19 disease and unexposed individuals. Cell. 2020;181:1489–501.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Heymann DL. Polio eradication: finishing the job and protecting the investment. Bull World Health Organ. 2004;82:1.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Jo WK, Drosten C, Drexler JF. The evolutionary dynamics of endemic human coronaviruses. Virus Evol. 2021;7:veab020.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kew O, Morris-Glasgow V, Landaverde M, Burns C, Shaw J, Garib Z, Andre J, Blackman E, Freeman CJ, Jorba J, Sutter R, Tambini G, Venczel L, Pedreira C, Laender F, Shimizu H, Yoneyama T, Miyamura T, van Der Avoort H, Oberste MS, Kilpatrick D, Cochi S, Pallansch M, de Quadros C. Outbreak of poliomyelitis in Hispaniola associated with circulating type 1 vaccine-derived poliovirus. Science. 2002;296:356–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Kew OM, Wright PF, Agol VI, Delpeyroux F, Shimizu H, Nathanson N, Pallansch MA. Circulating vaccine-derived polioviruses: current state of knowledge. Bull World Health Organ. 2004;82:16–23.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kumar S, Stecher G, Li M, Knyaz C, Tamura K. MEGA X: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis across computing platforms. Mol Biol Evol. 2018;35:1547–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Lai MM. Coronavirus: organization, replication and expression of genome. Annu Rev Microbiol. 1990;44:303–33.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Lai MM, Cavanagh D. The molecular biology of coronaviruses. Adv Virus Res. 1997;48:1–100.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Li Q, Guan X, Wu P, Wang X, Zhou L, Tong Y, Ren R, Leung KSM, Lau EHY, Wong JY, Xing X, Xiang N, Wu Y, Li C, Chen Q, Li D, Liu T, Zhao J, Liu M, Tu W, Chen C, Jin L, Yang R, Wang Q, Zhou S, Wang R, Liu H, Luo Y, Liu Y, Shao G, Li H, Tao Z, Yang Y, Deng Z, Liu B, Ma Z, Zhang Y, Shi G, Lam TTY, Wu JT, Gao GF, Cowling BJ, Yang B, Leung GM, Feng Z. Early transmission dynamics in Wuhan, China, of novel coronavirus-infected pneumonia. New Engl J Med. 2020;382:1199–207.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Li Q, Wang J, Tang Y, Lu H. Next-generation COVID-19 vaccines: opportunities for vaccine development and challenges in tackling COVID-19. Drug Discov Ther. 2021;15:118–23.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Liu Y, Zhang X, Liu J, Xia H, Zou J, Muruato AE, Periasamy S, Plante JA, Bopp NE, Kurhade C, Bukreyev A, Ren P, Wang T, Vineet DM, Plante KS, Xie X, Weaver SC, Shi PY. A live-attenuated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine candidate with accessory protein deletions. bioRxiv. (2022). 

  17. Lohrasbi-Nejad A. Detection of homologous recombination events in SARS-CoV-2. Biotechnol Lett. 2022;44:399–414.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Lole KS, Bollinger RC, Paranjape RS, Gadkari D, Kulkarni SS, Novak NG, Ingersoll R, Sheppard HW, Ray SC. Full-length human immunodeficiency virus type 1 genomes from subtype C-infected seroconverters in India, with evidence of intersubtype recombination. J Virol. 1999;73:152–60.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Maitra A, Sarkar MC, Raheja H, Biswas NK, Chakraborti S, Singh AK, Ghosh S, Sarkar S, Patra S, Mondal RK, Ghosh T, Chatterjee A, Banu H, Majumdar A, Chinnaswamy S, Srinivasan N, Dutta S, Das S. Mutations in SARS-CoV-2 viral RNA identified in Eastern India: possible implications for the ongoing outbreak in India and impact on viral structure and host susceptibility. J Biosci. 2020;45:1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Martin DP, Williamson C, Posada D. RDP2: recombination detection and analysis from sequence alignments. Bioinformatics. 2005;21:260–2.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Motamedi H, Ari MM, Dashtbin S, Fathollahi M, Hossainpour H, Alvandi A, Moradi J, Abiri R. An update review of globally reported SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in preclinical and clinical stages. Int Immunopharmacol. 2021;96:107763.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Nikolaidis M, Papakyriakou A, Chlichlia K, Markoulatos P, Oliver SG, Amoutzias GD. Comparative analysis of SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern, including omicron, highlights their common and distinctive amino acid substitution patterns, especially at the spike ORF. Viruses. 2022;14:707.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Nugent MA. The future of the COVID-19 pandemic: How good (or bad) can the SARS-CoV2 spike protein get? Cells. 2022;11:855.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Seo SH, Jang Y. Cold-adapted live attenuated SARS-Cov-2 vaccine completely protects human ACE2 transgenic mice from SARS-Cov-2 infection. Vaccines (Basel). 2020;8:584.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Souza PFN, Mesquita FP, Amaral JL, Landim PGC, Lima KRP, Costa MB, Farias IR, Belem MO, Pinto YO, Moreira HHT, Magalhaes ICL, Castelo-Branco D, Montenegro RC, de Andrade CR. The spike glycoprotein of SARS-CoV-2: a review of how mutations of spike glycoproteins have driven the emergence of variants with high transmissibility and immune escape. Int J Biol Macromol. 2022;208:105–25.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Trimpert J, Dietert K, Firsching TC, Ebert N, Thao TN, Vladimirova T, Kaufer D, Labroussaa S, Abdelgawad F, Conradie A, Hofler A, Adler T, Bertzbach JM, Jores LD, Gruber J, Thiel AD, Osterrieder V, Kunec N. Development of safe and highly protective live-attenuated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine candidates by genome recoding. Cell Rep. 2021;36:109493.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Wang W, Li CP, He M, Li SW, Cao L, Ding NZ, He CQ. The dominant strain of SARS-CoV-2 is a mosaicism. Virus Res. 2021;305:198553.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Wang Y, Yang C, Song Y, Coleman JR, Stawowczyk M, Tafrova J, Tasker S, Boltz D, Baker R, Garcia L, Seale O, Kushnir A, Wimmer E, Mueller S. Scalable live-attenuated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine candidate demonstrates preclinical safety and efficacy. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021;118:e2102775118.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. World-Health-Organization. Progress towards global eradication of poliomyelitis, 2002. Relev Epidemiol Hebd. 2003;78:138–44.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Zhu N, Zhang D, Wang W, Li X, Yang B, Song J, Zhao X, Huang B, Shi W, Lu R, Niu P, Zhan F, Ma X, Wang D, Xu W, Wu G, Gao GF, Tan W, China Novel Coronavirus, Research I, T. A novel coronavirus from patients with pneumonia in China, 2019. New Engl J Med. 2020;382:727–733.

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the sequence submitter for submitting the relevant sequence to the database. We thank anonymous reviewers for their valuable suggestions on improving the manuscript.

Funding

This research is supported by Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province (No. ZR2022MC105) to HCQ.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

HDC collected and processed sequences. HCQ conceptualized the project, analyzed data and wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cheng-Qiang He.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The authors confirm that the ethical policies of the journal, as noted on the journal’s author guidelines page, have been adhered to. No ethical approval was required as this is a study based on the public database data.

Consent for publication

All authors have revised the manuscript prior to submission.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

He, D.C., He, CQ. Discovery of vaccine-like recombinant SARS-CoV-2 circulating in human. Virol J 19, 209 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12985-022-01945-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12985-022-01945-5