Open Access

Serological survey of canine H3N2, pandemic H1N1/09, and human seasonal H3N2 influenza viruses in cats in northern China, 2010–2014

  • Xuxiao Zhang1,
  • Ye Shen1,
  • Lijie Du1,
  • Ran Wang1,
  • Bo Jiang1,
  • Honglei Sun1,
  • Juan Pu1,
  • Degui Lin1,
  • Ming Wang1,
  • Jinhua Liu1 and
  • Yipeng Sun1Email author
Contributed equally
Virology Journal201512:50

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12985-015-0285-5

Received: 13 October 2014

Accepted: 23 March 2015

Published: 1 April 2015

Abstract

Background

The close contact between cats and humans poses a threat to public health because of the potential zoonotic transmission of influenza viruses to humans. Therefore, we examined the seroprevalence of pandemic H1N1/09, canine H3N2, and human H3N2 viruses in pet cats in northern China from 2010 to 2014.

Finding

Of 1794 serum samples, the seropositivity rates for H1N1/09, canine H3N2, and human H3N2 were 5.7%, 0.7%, and 0.4%, respectively. The seropositivity rate for H1N1/09 in cats was highest in 2010 (8.3%), and then declined continuously thereafter. Cats older than 10 years were most commonly seropositive for the H1N1/09 virus.

Conclusions

Our findings emphasize the need for continuous surveillance of influenza viruses in cats in China.

Keywords

Influenza Antibodies Cat

Different subtypes of influenza viruses are reported to be naturally transmitted to cats from other species worldwide, including avian viruses (H5N1), canine viruses (H3N2), and human viruses (pandemic H1N1/09, seasonal H1N1, and H3N2) [1-3]. The close contact between cats and humans possesses a threat to public health because of the potential zoonotic transmission of influenza viruses to humans. In China, the canine H3N2 and H1N1/09 influenza viruses circulate in dogs [4], and the seasonal H3N2 and H1N1/09 viruses are prevalent in humans [5,6], any of which might be transmitted to cats. Therefore, we examined the seroprevalence of the pandemic H1N1/09, canine H3N2, and human seasonal H3N2 influenza viruses in cats in northern China from January 2010 to June 2014.

A total of 1794 serum samples were collected from domestic cats that presented to the Veterinary Teaching Hospital of China Agricultural University between January 2010 and June 2014 (average, 33.2 ± 9.7 samples/month). These cats were from Beijing, Tianjin, Hebei, Henan, and Shandong Provinces. The A/canine/Beijing/359/2009 (H3N2) canine influenza virus has been described previously [7]. The pandemic A/Beijing/7/2009 (H1N1) and seasonal A/Beijing/126/2012 (H3N2) viruses were isolated from patients with influenza-like illnesses. These viruses were used for both hemagglutination inhibition (HI) and microneutralization (MN) assays. The serum samples were treated with receptor-destroying enzyme (RDE; 1 part serum, 3 parts RDE; Denka Seiken, Ltd, Tokyo, Japan) for 18 h at 37°C, which was then heat inactivated at 56°C for 30 min. Then, 25 μL of serial two fold dilutions of the treated serum samples were mixed with 4 HA units of virus in V-shaped microtiter plates and incubated at room temperature for 30 min. Next 25 μL of 1% chicken RBCs was added to each well and incubated at room temperature for 30 min [8]. The HI titers of tested serum samples ranged from 0 to 512, and samples with HI antibody titers ≥ 32 were considered positive. HI antibody titer is defined as the reciprocal of the highest serum dilution that completely inhibits hemagglutination reaction. WHO guidelines for vaccine evaluation suggest that HI antibody titers 40 indicate 50% protection against influenza A virus [9,10]. Therefore, we defined HI antibody titers 32 as the cut-off levels to estimate the infection rates [11,12]. Of the tested serum samples, 102 (5.7%), 12 (0.7%), and 8 (0.4%) were positive for H1N1/09, canine H3N2, and human H3N2 influenza-virus-specific antibodies, respectively. The seropositivity rate for H1N1/09 in cats was highest in 2010 (8.3%), and then declined continuously thereafter (Figure 1), whereas those for the canine H3N2 and human H3N2 viruses were relatively low in each year. The geometric mean titers (GMTs) of the antibodies against the H1N1/09, canine H3N2, and human H3N2 viruses were 139.9, 149.3, and 44.0, respectively (Figure 2).
Figure 1

Yearly seroprevalence of influenza viruses in domestic cats in northern China.

Figure 2

HI titers in serum samples positive for H1N1/09, canine H3N2, or human H3N2 virus in cats. In total, 1794 serum specimens were tested with an HI assay, and HI antibody titers ≥ 32 were considered positive. The number of positive serum samples for each virus is shown. GMTs and 95% confidence intervals are indicated by long and short horizontal lines, respectively.

All the serum samples that were HI-positive for H1N1/09, canine H3N2, or human H3N2 viruses and a negative control serum sample were tested for each of the three viruses with an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)-based MN assay [13]. Briefly, the treated sera were serially diluted two fold in duplicate and incubated with the test virus at a final viral concentration of 100 50% tissue culture infection dose (TCID50)/100 μL for 2 h at 37°C. The serum–virus mixture was transferred onto an MDCK cell monolayer maintained in minimum essential medium supplemented with TPCK trypsin (2 μg/mL; Worthington Biochemical Corp., USA) and incubated for 24 h. The reaction plate of the MN assay was tested with an ELISA for the presence of the viral nucleoprotein using a specific mouse monoclonal antibody (AA5H; 1:1500 dilution; Abcam Ltd, Hong Kong) as the primary antibody and a goat anti-mouse IgGs antibody as the secondary antibody. The antibody titer was defined as the reciprocal of the highest serum dilution that reduced the amount of viral nucleoprotein in the reaction wells by 50% compared with that in the control wells. The MN titers for the tested strains in the selected samples were all ≥ 80 (range, 80–1280), which correlated with the HI titers according to Spearman’s rank correlation (correlation coefficient = 0.309; P = 0.001), and minimal nonspecific cross-reactivity (MN titers ≤ 20) was observed among the subtypes (Figure 3).
Figure 3

MN titers in serum samples positive for H1N1/09, canine H3N2, or human H3N2 virus in cats. The controls and nonspecific cross-reactivity samples (MN titers ≤ 20) were included.

The associations between age, sex or seasonality and the seroprevalence of H1N1/09, canine H3N2, and human H3N2 in cats were investigated. Pearson’s χ2 test was used to compare the differences between groups. The results are presented in Table 1, and showed that the seroprevalence of H1N1/09 differed statistically significantly among the different age groups (P < 0.001). The seropositive rate for H1N1/09 was higher in cats aged more than 10 years than in the other age groups. There were no statistically significant differences in the seroprevalence of either the canine H3N2 (P = 0.876) or human H3N2 (P = 0.754) virus among the age groups. No significant differences in the seroprevalence of any virus tested according to sex or seasonality were observed (P > 0.05).
Table 1

Characteristics of the tested cats for three influenza viruses and the seroprevalence of the sera against these influenza viruses

Characteristic

No. (%) samples a

No. (%) positive

H1N1/09 b

Canine H3N2 c

Human H3N2 d

Age (year)

    

≤2

455 (25.4%)

12 (2.6%)

2 (0.4%)

1 (0.2%)

3-6

463 (25.8%)

13 (2.8%)

4 (0.9%)

3 (0.6%)

7-9

334 (18.6%)

21 (6.3%)

2 (0.6%)

2 (0.6%)

≥10

542 (30.2%)

56 (10.3%)

4 (0.7%)

2 (0.4%)

  

P e < 0.001

P = 0.876

P = 0.754

Sex

    

Male

1028 (57.3%)

53 (5.2%)

5 (0.5%)

4 (0.4%)

Female

766 (42.7%)

49 (6.4%)

7 (0.9%)

4 (0.5%)

  

P = 0.261

P = 0.272

P = 0.676

Season

    

Spring (Mar–May)

578 (32.2%)

39 (6.7%)

2 (0.3%)

1 (0.2%)

Summer (Jun–Aug)

352 (19.6%)

15 (4.3%)

3 (0.9%)

1 (0.3%)

Autumn (Sep–Nov)

446 (24.9%)

22 (4.9%)

4 (0.9%)

4 (0.9%)

Winter (Dec–Feb)

418 (23.3%)

26 (6.2%)

3 (0.7%)

2 (0.5%)

  

P = 0.356

P = 0.694

P = 0.357

aHI positive samples were analyzed. bH1N1/09 is A/Beijing/7/2009 (H1N1). cCanine H3N2 is A/canine/Beijing/359/2009 (H3N2). dHuman H3N2 is A/Beijing/126/2012 (H3N2). ePearson’s χ2 test was used to compare the differences between groups.

Although neither H1N1/09, canine H3N2, nor human H3N2 has previously been isolated from cats in China, we provided serological evidence that these viruses infected cats in this country. H1N1/09 influenza virus has been repeatedly detected in cats in other countries, and the infected cats present severe respiratory symptoms or even death [14-16]. Evidence of the cat-to-cat transmission of H1N1/09 has be observed both experimentally and clinically [15,17]. In contrast, only one canine H3N2 strain has been isolated from cats [2], and no human seasonal H3N2 virus has been detected in cats. Consistent with these data, the seroprevalence of H1N1/09 (5.7%) was higher than that of canine H3N2 (0.7%) or human seasonal H3N2 (0.4%) in the present study.

Cats aged 10 years or more had a higher seroprevalence of H1N1/09 influenza virus than the other age groups, which might be attributable to the reduced immunity of old cats. The seropositivity rate of H1N1/09 influenza in this study (5.7%) was higher than that in domestic cats in Germany in the period from 2010 to 2011 (1.9%) [18], or in cats in southern China (1.2% by ELISA and 0.6% by HI) [19]. A high prevalence of H1N1/09 was observed among domestic cats in America during the 2009–2010 influenza season (21.8%) [20], and an H1N1/09 outbreak, with a seroprevalence (55%), occurred in a cat colony in Italy in November 2009 [15]. Zhao et al. found a particularly high seropositivity rate for H1N1/09 (21%) in northeastern China from 2012 to 2013 [21]. Our results show that the highest seropositivity rate in cats during the period examined was in 2010, which was possibly related to the outbreak of the H1N1/09 virus in humans in China.

The present study demonstrates that the H1N1/09, canine H3N2, and human H3N2 influenza viruses are prevalent in cats in China. Therefore, the continuous surveillance of influenza viruses in cats in China is necessary to monitor the threat of infection at the human–animal interface.

Notes

Declarations

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Basic Research Program (973 Program) (no. 2011CB504702), the Chinese National High-Tech R&D Program (863 Program) (2012AA101303), and the National Science & Technology Pillar Program (2013BAD12B01).

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
State Key Laboratory of Agrobiotechnology, College of Veterinary Medicine and Key Laboratory of Animal Epidemiology and Zoonosis of the Ministry of Agriculture, China Agricultural University

References

  1. Ali A, Daniels JB, Zhang Y, Rodriguez-Palacios A, Hayes-Ozello K, Mathes L, et al. Pandemic and seasonal human influenza virus infections in domestic cats: prevalence, association with respiratory disease, and seasonality patterns. J Clin Microbiol. 2011;49(12):4101–5.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Park SJ, Kang BK, Jeoung HY, Moon HJ, Hong M, Na W, et al. Complete Genome Sequence of a Canine-Origin H3N2 Feline Influenza Virus Isolated from Domestic Cats in South Korea. Genome Announc. 2013;1(2):e0025312.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Songserm T, Amonsin A, Jam-on R, Sae-Heng N, Meemak N, Pariyothorn N, et al. Avian influenza H5N1 in naturally infected domestic cat. Emerg Infect Dis. 2006;12(4):681–3.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Sun Y, Shen Y, Zhang X, Wang Q, Liu L, Han X, et al. A serological survey of canine H3N2, pandemic H1N1/09 and human seasonal H3N2 influenza viruses in dogs in China. Vet Microbiol. 2014;168(1):193–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Huang WJ, Cheng YH, Li XY, Zhao X, Guo JF, Wang Z, et al. Virological characterization of influenza A(H3N2) virus in Mainland China during 2011-2012. Bing Du Xue Bao. 2013;29(3):258–64.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Liu T, Li Z, Song S, Zhang S, Wang Y, Wang L, et al. Seroepidemiological study of influenza A (H1N1) pdm09 virus following the 2009-2010 wave in Shandong Province. China Scand J Infect Dis. 2013;45(7):552–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Sun Y, Sun S, Ma J, Tan Y, Du L, Shen Y, et al. Identification and characterization of avian-origin H3N2 canine influenza viruses in northern China during 2009-2010. Virology. 2013;435(2):301–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Health WOA. Manual of Diagnostic Tests and Vaccines for Terrestrial Animals. 2012.Google Scholar
  9. De Jong JC, Palache AM, Beyer WE, Rimmelzwaan GF, Boon AC, Osterhaus AD. Haemagglutination-inhibiting antibody to influenza virus. Dev Biol (Basel). 2003;115:63–73.Google Scholar
  10. Eichelberger M, Golding H, Hess M, Weir J, Subbarao K, Luke CJ, et al. FDA/NIH/WHO public workshop on immune correlates of protection against influenza A viruses in support of pandemic vaccine development, Bethesda, Maryland, US, December 10-11, 2007. Vaccine. 2008;26(34):4299–303.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Hancock K, Veguilla V, Lu X, Zhong W, Butler EN, Sun H, et al. Cross-reactive antibody responses to the 2009 pandemic H1N1 influenza virus. N Engl J Med. 2009;361(20):1945–52.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Lerdsamran H, Pittayawonganon C, Pooruk P, Mungaomklang A, Iamsirithaworn S, Thongcharoen P, et al. Serological response to the 2009 pandemic influenza A (H1N1) virus for disease diagnosis and estimating the infection rate in Thai population. PLoS One. 2011;6(1):e16164.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Rowe T, Abernathy RA, Hu-Primmer J, Thompson WW, Lu X, Lim W, et al. Detection of antibody to avian influenza A (H5N1) virus in human serum by using a combination of serologic assays. J Clin Microbiol. 1999;37(4):937–43.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Campagnolo ER, Rankin JT, Daverio SA, Hunt EA, Lute JR, Tewari D, et al. Fatal pandemic (H1N1) 2009 influenza A virus infection in a Pennsylvania domestic cat. Zoonoses Public Health. 2011;58(7):500–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Fiorentini L, Taddei R, Moreno A, Gelmetti D, Barbieri I, De Marco MA, et al. Influenza A pandemic (H1N1) 2009 virus outbreak in a cat colony in Italy. Zoonoses Public Health. 2011;58(8):573–81.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Pigott AM, Haak CE, Breshears MA, Linklater AK: Acute bronchointerstitial pneumonia in two indoor cats exposed to the H1N1 influenza virus. J Vet Emerg Crit Care (San Antonio) 2014; 24(6):715-23.Google Scholar
  17. van den Brand JM, Stittelaar KJ, Van Amerongen G, van de Bildt MW, Leijten LM, Kuiken T, et al. Experimental pandemic (H1N1) 2009 virus infection of cats. Emerg Infect Dis. 2010;16(11):1745–7.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Damiani AM, Kalthoff D, Beer M, Muller E, Osterrieder N. Serological survey in dogs and cats for influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 in Germany. Zoonoses Public Health. 2012;59(8):549–52.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Su S, Yuan L, Li H, Chen J, Xie J, Huang Z, et al. Serologic evidence of pandemic influenza virus H1N1 2009 infection in cats in China. Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2013;20(1):115–7.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. McCullers JA, Van De Velde LA, Schultz RD, Mitchell CG, Halford CR, Boyd KL, et al. Seroprevalence of seasonal and pandemic influenza A viruses in domestic cats. Arch Virol. 2011;156(1):117–20.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Zhao FR, Liu CG, Yin X, Zhou DH, Wei P, Chang HY. Serological report of pandemic (H1N1) 2009 infection among cats in northeastern China in 2012-02 and 2013-03. Virol J. 2014;11:49.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Zhang et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Advertisement