Skip to main content


We're creating a new version of this page. See preview

  • Research
  • Open Access

Determination of HCV genotypes and viral loads in chronic HCV infected patients of Hazara Pakistan

  • 1,
  • 1, 2,
  • 3,
  • 1, 2,
  • 4Email author and
  • 5
Virology Journal20118:466

  • Received: 21 July 2011
  • Accepted: 9 October 2011
  • Published:


Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) genotype and viral load are two significant predictive variables knowledge of which might persuade treatment decisions. The objective of the present study was to identify the distribution of different HCV genotypes circulating in the study area and to estimate viral load in chronically HCV infected patients. Out of total 305 HCV positive patients, 177 (58%) were males and 128 (42%) were females. Frequency breakup of the HCV positive patients was 169, 69, 38 and 29 from Abbottabad, Mansehra, Haripur and Battagram districts respectively. Out of the total 305 tested serum samples, 255 (83.06%) were successfully genotyped whereas 50 (16.4%) samples were found with unclassified genotypes. Among typable genotypes, 1a accounted for 21 (6.8%) 1b for 14 (4.6%), 2a for 4 (1.31%) 3a for 166 (54.42%) and genotype 3b for (8.19%). Twenty five (8.19%) patients were infected with mixed HCV genotypes. Viral load distribution was classified into three categories based on its viral load levels such as low (< 60, 0000 IU/mL), intermediate (60,0000-80,0000 IU/mL) and high (> 80,0000 IU/mL). The baseline HCV RNA Viral load in HCV genotype 3 infected patients was 50 (26.17%), 46 (24.08%) and 95 (49.73%) for low, intermediate and high categories respectively. For genotypes other than 3, these values for low, intermediate and high viral load categories were 50 (43.85), 35 (30.70) and 29 (25.43) respectively. Pre-treatment viral load in patients with untypable genotype was 19 (38.00%), 5 (20.00%) and 11 (44.00%) for low, intermediate and high viral load categories. Viral load distribution was also categorized sex wise; for males it was 58 (32.76%), 26 (14.68%) and 93 (52.54%) whereas for females it was 40 (31.25%), 34 (26.56%) and 54 (42.18%) for low, intermediate and high viral load respectively. In conclusion HCV genotype 3a is the most prevalent genotype circulating in Hazara Division like other parts of pakistan. Pre-treatment viral load is significantly high (p 0.014) in patients infected with HCV genotype 3 as compared to other genotypes.


  • Viral Load
  • Sustained Virological Response
  • Mixed Genotype
  • Hazara Division
  • Viral Load Distribution


Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is a principal cause of chronic liver diseases including liver fibrosis, liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma [1, 2]. Nearly 170-200 million individuals infected globally including 10-17 million persons in Pakistan [1, 35]. HCV is an enveloped virus having positive single stranded RNA as its genome that was firstly discovered in 1989 belonging to a virus family Flaviviridae [3, 6, 7]. HCV genome is approximately 9.6 kb in length with single open reading frame and encodes a polypeptide of 3000 amino acids [8, 9]. Total six major HCV genotypes and multiple subtypes have been identified from around the world [10]. Identification of HCV genotype/subtype is extremely important clinically before prescribing therapy because genotypes 1 & 4 show more resistance as compared to genotypes 2 and 3 to PEG-IFN plus ribavarin therapy, therefore different types of HCV genotypes require different duration and dose of anti viral therapy [11]. Treatment durations for genotypes 1 and 4 are 48 weeks where as for 2 and 3 is 24 weeks with PEG-IFN plus ribavarin therapy [12]. Prevalence of viral genotypes has been documented in three different patterns to date [1]. First pattern differentiate by high genetic heterogeneity involves different geographical regions of West Africa with types 1 and 2 [13], Central Africa with type 4 [14] and Asia with types 3 and 6 [15]. Second pattern entails regions with a few subtypes circulating in an intravenous drugs abusers groups, e.g., subtype 3a [16]. The last pattern involves areas where a single subtype is circulate, such as in Egypt with subtype 4a [17] and South Africa with subtype 5a [18].

Beside HCV genotypes, pre-treatment viral load has also been shown to be prognostic indicator of response to antiviral therapy [19] as increased pre-treatment viral load has been linked with low rates of response to standard interferon therapy [2022]. Several studies have shown that patients with lower pre-treatment viral load (< 80,0000) are more likely to positively respond to currently available antiviral therapy as compared to high pre-treatment viral load (> 80,0000) [2325]. The findings of several studies have also been indicated that a decline in HCV viral load during the first 2-12 weeks of therapy with antiviral treatment indicate to be prognostic of therapeutic efficacy [26, 27]. Hence HCV genotype, baseline viral load and decrease of viral load in the stage of initial therapy play important roles in modifying and optimizing antiviral treatment [28].

In Pakistan few large scale studies are available that have been conducted in different districts, cities and towns for the identification of HCV genotypes in chronic HCV infected patients circulating in that particular areas [5, 2931]. No study is available from Pakistan that has correlated pre-treatment viral load with HCV genotypes. Therefore, this study was conducted to identify the distribution of different HCV genotypes/Subtypes and pre-treatment HCV RNA viral load in HCV infected patients belonged to different parts of Hazara Division of Pakistan.



Total of 305 serum samples were collected from different chronically HCV infected patients for HCV genotyping along with specifically designed data sheets from patients visiting/attending various secondary and tertiary collection centers situated in different cities/towns of Hazara Division of Khyber Pakhtoonkhaw (KPK), Pakistan. Informed consent was taken in written form from each participated patient including, demographic characteristic, age, district, and estimated time of infection along with complete address and phone number of the patients. Written informed consent was taken from each patient.

HCV Qualitative test

Samples were subjected firstly for the detection of HCV RNA qualitatively as previously describe by Idrees [32]. Reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR) was done for the identification of HCV RNA. RNA was extracted from 100 μl patient's sera using Quigen RNA extraction kit according to the kit protocol. Nested PCR were performed using Taq DNA polymerase enzyme (Fermentas Technologies USA) in a volume of 20 μl reaction mix. The nested PCR products were visualized on 2% agarose gel under "UV"light using "Uvitec" gel documentation system.

HCV Quantitative test

HCV RNA quantification was done by using SmartCycler II Real-time PCR (Cepheid, Sunnyvale, Calif. USA) with HCV RNA quantification kits (Sacace Biotechnologies, Italy). The SmartCycler II system is a PCR system by which amplification and diagnosis were accomplished at same time with TaqMan technology (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, Calif) using fluorescent probes to investigate amplification after each replicating cycle. The lower and upper detection limits of the used assay were 250 and 5.0 × 108 IU/mL, respectively. Specimens yielding values above the upper limit were diluted 100-fold, retested and the obtained values were multiplied by this dilution factor to get the actual HCV RNA concentration in international units (IU) per mL.

HCV Genotyping

All qualitative PCR positive sera were subjected to HCV genotyping by using type-specific HCV genotyping procedure as described previously in detail [33]. Briefly, 10 μl (about 50 ng) of HCV RNA was reverse transcribed to cDNA using 100 U of M-MLV RTEs at temperature of 37°C for 50 minutes. Two μl of synthesized cDNA was used for PCR amplification of 470-bp region from HCV 5'NCR along with core region by first round PCR amplification. The amplified first round PCR product were subjected to two second rounds of nested PCR amplifications. One with mix-I primers set and the second with mix-II primers set in a reaction volume of 10 μl. Mix-I had specific genotype primers set for 1a, 1b, 1c, 3a, 3c and 4 genotypes and mix-II contain specific genotype primers set for 2a, 2c, 3b, 5a and 6a.

Statistical Analysis

Given data was analyzed and the summary statistic was carried out by a statistical package, SPSS version 10.0. All variables results were given in the form of rates (%). Chi Square test was used for categorical variables that measured association among categorical variables. All data are presented as mean values or number of patients. P-values less than 0.05 were considered significant


Distribution of HCV genotypes in studied patients

Table 1 shows the distribution of HCV genotypes in the studied population. Out of total 305 patients, more than 88% were male and about 42% were female. Out of the total 305 tested serum samples, type-specific PCR fragments were seen in 255 (83.06%) serum samples whereas 50 (16.4%) samples were found with untypeable genotypes as no genotype-specific band was seen in these samples. The distribution of typeable genotypes is as follows: genotype 1a accounted for 21 (6.8%), 1b for 14 (4.6%), 2a for 4 (1.31%) 3a for 166 (54.42%) and genotype 3b for 25 (8.19%) patients. Twenty five (8.19%) patients were infected by two (mixed) genotypes at a time. Predominant genotype of the study is 3a followed by 3b. The predominant genotype among males was 3 (61.58%), followed genotype 1 (11.86%), 2 (1.69%), mixed genotype (8.47%) and undetermined (16.38%). Similarly the frequent genotype among the infected female patients was 3 (64.06%) followed genotype 1 (10.39%), genotype 2 (0.78), (16.40%) and mixed genotypes (7.81%). The HCV sub-genotype pattern in males was: subtype 3a was identified in 96 (54.23%), 3b in 12 (9.37%), 1a in 11 (6.21%), 1b in 10 (5.64%) and 2a in 3 (1.69%) HCV infected patients. Among the females it was: subtype 3a in 70 (54.68%), 3b in 12 (9.37%), 1a in 10 (7.8%), 1b in 4 (3.12%) and 2a was identified in 1 (0.78%) patient.
Table 1

Pattern of HCV genotype among the infected patients (N = 305)



Male (%)

Female (%)

Total (%)

Genotype 1


21 (11.86%)

14 (10.93%)

35 (11.47%)



11 (6.21%)

10 (7.8%)

21 (6%)



10 (5.64%)

4 (3.12%)

14 (4%)

Genotype 2


3 (1.69%)

1 (0.78%)

4 (1.31%)



3 (1.69%)

1 (0.78%)

4 (1.31%)

Genotype 3


109 (61.58%)

82 (64.06%)

191 (62.62%)



96 (54.23%)

70 (54.68%)

166 (86.91%)



13 (7.34%)

12 (9.37%)

25 (13.08%)

Mixed Genotypes


15 (8.47%)

10 (7.81%)

25 (8.19%)



29 (16.38%)

21 (16.40%)

50 (16.39%)






Distribution of HCV genotypes in different age groups

The distribution of HCV genotypes in different age group patients is shown in table 2. Genotype 3a was the predominant genotype (45.8%) in young patients (ages between 31-40 years). Frequent prevalence was found in age group of 31-40
Table 2

Pattern of HCV genotypes/subtypes in different age groups (N = 305)


Age groups (in years)







> 60



8 (38.08%)

3 (14.3%)

8 (38.08%)

2 (9.0%)




3 (21.42%)

7 (50%)

2 (14.5%)

2 (14.5%)



1 (25%)

1 (25%)

1 (25%)





2 (1.2%)

33 (19.9%)

76 (45.8%)

32 (19.3%)

15 (9.03%)

8 (4.81%)


2 (8%)

8 (32%)

7 (28%)


1 (4%)

1 (4%)

Mixed genotypes

4 (16%)

4 (16%)

8 (32%)

5 (20%)

3 (12%)



7 (28%)

7 (28%)

21 (24%)

8 (16%)

6 (12%)



16 (5.25%)

64 (20.32%)




11 (3.61%)

Distribution of HCV genotypes in different parts of Hazara

Table 3 demonstrates the prevalence of HCV genotypes that were recorded from HCV patients belonged to different parts of Hazara Division. Among the typeble genotypes 169 belonged to Abbottabad. Among the genotypes samples from Abbottabad 12 (7.10%) were 1a, 10 (5.10%) were 1b, 100 (59.17%) were 3a, 12 (7.10%) were untypable and 26 (15.38%) were with mixed genotypes. Genotypes distribution among the patients of Mansehra was 69. Among these, 4 (5.79%) were 1a, 2 (2.8%) were 1b, 40 (57.97%) were 3a, 10 (3.55%) were 3b and 8 (11.59%) were with mixed genotypes. Five (7.24%) were untypeable. Out of 38 samples that were genotyped in HCV positive sera from Haripur, 3 (7.89%) were 1a, 18 (47.36%) were 3a, 4 (10.52%) were 3b, 8 (21.05%) were with mixed genotypes and 3 (7.89%) were undetermined. Prevalence of HCV genotypes among Battagram positive patients were 29 in which 2 (6.89%) were 1a, 1 (3.44%) was 2a, 8 (27.58%) were 3a, 5 (17.24%) were 3b, 8 (27.58%) were with double infection and 5 (17.24%) were unclassified HCV.
Table 3

Prevalence of HCV genotypes in different geographic regions of Hazara (N = 305)



Isolated from Abbottabad

Isolated from Mansehra

Isolated from Haripur

Isolated from Battagram

P Value



































< 0.05














> 0.05








HCV RNA viral loads in male and female patients with different genotypes

Viral load was classified into three categories based on its level such as low (< 60, 0000 IU/ml), intermediate (60,0000-80,00000 IU/ml) and high (> 80,00000 IU/ml) viral load. Base line HCV Viral load for each genotype in both male and female patients are shown in table 4. Pre-treatment viral load was found high significantly (p 0.014) in patients infected with HCV genotype 3 as compared to other genotypes. No significant difference was observed in male and female HCV infected patients (p 0.343).
Table 4

HCV RNA viral load categories and their distribution in sex and genotype in studied population


Viral load

P value


< 60,0000


> 80,0000


Genotype 3





Other genotypes

















Genotype 3





Other genotypes







Genotype 3












Genotype 3












Genotype 3











Hazara Division is a historical and beautiful locality of the province Khyber Pakhtoonkhaw (KPK) province of Pakistan. This part of the world has been mapped such that on the North and East lies the Northern Areas and Azad Kashmir, to the South are the Islamabad Capital Territory and the province of Punjab, while the rest of KPK lies to its West. The river forms majority of the western border of the Division by running in a North-south fashion. Hazara Division is one of the most diverse regions based on the ethnic groups it is comprised of, such as Awan, Dhund Abbassi, Gabari, Ghakkar, Gujjar, Jadoon, Karlal, Karlugh, Kohistanis, Maddakhel, Mishawani, Paracha, Shilmani, Syed, Swati, Tahirkheli, Tanoli, Tareen, Turks, Kashmiri, Dilazak and the Isazai Pashtoon respectively [34].

In this study we have studied the distribution of HCV genotypes and associated these genotypes with gender. The results of this study clearly showed that there is no variation among the HCV genotypes and gender as different HCV genotypes were distributed with same ratio between males and females. In agreement with this observation of our study, no significant difference was seen by Idrees and Riazuddin [5] in gender and variation among genotypes in this part of the world. On the other hand in contrast to our observation, in Libya HCV genotypes were not distributed with same pattern between males and females as seen in Pakistan. In Libya, the prevalence of HCV genotype 1 was found to be significantly associated with males while genotype 4 was seen frequently in females [35]. Our results indicated that high prevalence rate 40.32% of HCV infection was found between age group of 30-40. These findings are in agreement with the findings of Ahmad et al, [29] that highest rate of prevalence was observed in age group of ≤ 40 years and similar findings were also observed by Inamullah et al, [30]. But our findings contradict from that of Muhammad et al, [36] that high HCV prevalence rate in Pakistan was found in old age group people. So these results suggest that early diagnosis of HCV might be due to the awareness of public about HCV infection in this part of the world. Currently a number of studies have been carried out to find the frequencies of various HCV genotypes in different geographical regions of Pakistan and the most prevalent genotype was 3a [5, 28, 31, 37]. Data analysis of the present study showed that genotype 3a (54.42%) has high prevalence rate followed by 3b and 1a in chronic HCV infected patients. These results confirmed the findings of other studies reported from Pakistan that the most prevalent genotype is 3a followed by genotype 3b and 1a, respectively [27, 6, 5, 33, 38]. Identified HCV genotypes in our study showed no regional difference and was distributed with same fashion predominant genotype was 3a followed by 3b as has also been reported by Ali et al., [27] from various regions of Pakistan where the authors concluded that there is no regional difference in HCV genotype distribution. Our pattern of HCV genotypes distribution is similar to that reported from neighboring countries like in Iran and India where predominant genotype is 3 [39, 40], and is different from South Asian countries such as Japan and Thailand where genotype 1 is the common HCV genotype [41, 42].

In the present study 8.19% of the studied patients were found infected by two different genotypes at the same time, majority of these were thalassaemic patients who had received unsafe blood in past. Our results are supported by other studies that show that mixed genotypes are more frequent where blood transfusion is common especially in thalassaemic patients [27]. Franciscus [21] states that mixed genotypes in a single patient may affect the antiviral therapy response and disease succession. We were unable to identify HCV genotypes 4, 5 and 6 in the current study. This observation confirmed the previously reported arguments that these three genotypes are not existing in this region or these are partially absent from Pakistan [27, 28].

It has already been reported that patients with higher viral load show lower response rates to standard antiviral therapy as compared to patients having lower viral load [21]. Our findings carry some important implication for the therapeutic hindrance that genotype 3 is the most common genotype in Pakistan [5] and also in our studied patients. Untimely detection and treatment are significant to achieve a high level of sustained virological response (SVR) [43]. Early time detection involves the identification of low HCV RNA level [11]. As determined by Von et al., [21] and Dalgard et al, [22], that shorter therapy schedules told that genotype 3 HCV infected patients with low baseline viral load (HCV-RNA, < 600, 000-800, 000 IU/mL) had more likely to attained a sustained virological response (SVR) as compared to those with a high viral load (HCV-RNA > 60000-800000 IU/mL). We found only 50 (26.17%) patients infected by genotype 3 in our studied patients that had intermediate viral load (< 80,0000) after HCV RNA quantification. As per the research findings Von et al. [21], patients having genotype 3 and with high viral load (> 80,0000 IU/mL) should be treated for 24 weeks where as patients with low (< 80,0000 IU/mL) RNA viral load might be treated for 16 weeks for those patients whose HCV RNA PCR is undetectable at week 4 of treatment. Our findings along with those of Von et al. [21] further recommend that extensive information about HCV genotype and basal RNA viral load is necessary when planning therapy strategies against HCV at national level. These results also help to modify antiviral therapy individually for infected HCV patients with genotype 3 that will reduce economic burden, side effects of antiviral therapy, and also may promote optimize response rates. Finally the results of this study show that more than one genotype of HCV circulates in Hazara Division of KPK, Pakistan. Pre dominant genotype was 3a followed by 3b and 1a.


In the present study, we conclude that HCV genotype 3a is the most prevalent genotype circulating in this region of the world. Regional difference do exists in HCV genotypes. Majority of the infected patients are young ages between 31-40 years. Baseline viral load is significantly high in patients infected by HCV genotype 3 (subtypes a & b) as compared to other genotypes such as 1 (subtypes a, b, c), 2 (subtypes a, b) and untypeable genotypes.



Thanks to all the clinicians and patients for their cooperation in the study.

Authors’ Affiliations

Department of Biotechnology, University of Malakand, Chakdara, Khyber Pakhtoonkhaw, Pakistan
Department of Botany, University of Malakand, Chakdara, Khyber Pakhtoonkhaw, Pakistan
Department of Genetics, Hazara University, Mansehra, Pakistan
Division of Molecular Virology, National Centre of Excellence in Molecular Biology University of Punjab Lahore, Pakistan
Department of Gastroenterology, Sheikh Zayed Medical Comple, Lahore, Pakistan


  1. Simmonds P: Genetic diversity and evolution of hepatitis C virus--15 years on. J Gen Virol 2004, 85: 3173-3188. 10.1099/vir.0.80401-0View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Poynard T, Ratziu V, Benhamou Y, Opolon P, Cacoub P, Bedossa P: Natural history of HCV infection. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2000, 14: 211-228. 10.1053/bega.1999.0071View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Butt S, Idrees M, Akbar H, Rehman I, Awan Z, Afzal S: The changing epidemiology pattern and frequency distribution of hepatitis C virus in Pakistan. Infect Genet Evol 2010, 10: 595-600. 10.1016/j.meegid.2010.04.012View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Khan S, Attaullah S, Ayaz S, N Khan S, Shams S, Ali I, Bilal M, Siraj S: Molecular Epidemiology of HCV among Health Care Workers of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa . Virology Journal 2011, 8: 105. 10.1186/1743-422X-8-105PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Idrees M, Riazuddin S: Frequency distribution of hepatitis C virus genotypes in different geographical regions of Pakistan and their possible routes of transmission. BMC Infect Dis 2008, 8-69.Google Scholar
  6. Idrees M, Lal A, Naseem M, Khalid M: High prevalence of hepatitis C virus infection in the largest province of Pakistan. J Dig Dis 2008, 9: 95-103. 10.1111/j.1751-2980.2008.00329.xView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Choo QL, Richman KH, Han JH, Berger K, Lee C, Dong C, Gallegos C, Coit D, Medina-Selby R, Barr PJ, Weiner A, Bradley DW, Kuo G, Houghton M: Genetic organization and diversity of the hepatitis C virus. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1991, 88: 2451-2455. 10.1073/pnas.88.6.2451PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Inchauspe G, Zebedee S, Lee DH, Sugitani M, Nasoff M, Prince AM: Genomic structure of the human prototype strain H of hepatitis C virus: comparison with American and Japanese isolates. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1991, 88: 10292-20296. 10.1073/pnas.88.22.10292PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Lemon SM, Walker CM, Alter MJ, Yi M: Hepatitis C virus. In Fields Virology. Lippincot Williams and Wilkins, Philadelpia; 2007:1253-1304.Google Scholar
  10. Zein NN, Persing D: Hepatitis C genotypes: current trends and future implications. Mayo Clin Proc 1996, 71: 458-462. 10.4065/71.5.458View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Jimenez-M R, Urbie-S F, Guillen L-P, Garza C-L, Hernandez Ca-G: Distribution of HCV genotypes and HCV RNA viral load in different geographical regions of Mexico. Annals Hepatology 2010, 9: 33-39.Google Scholar
  12. Hanatyszyn HJ: Chronic hepatitis and genotyping: the clinical significance of determining HCV genotypes. Antiviral Ther 2005, 10: 1-11.Google Scholar
  13. Candotti D, Temple J, Sarkodie F, Allain JP: Frequent recovery and broad genotype 2 diversity characterize hepatitis C virus infection in Ghana, West Africa. J Virol 2003, 77: 7914-7923. 10.1128/JVI.77.14.7914-7923.2003PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Ndjomou J, Pybus OG, Matz B: Phylogenetic analysis of hepatitis C virus isolates indicates a unique pattern of endemic infection in Cameroon. J Gen Virol 2003, 84: 2333-2341. 10.1099/vir.0.19240-0View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Abid K, Quadri R, Veuthey AL, Hadengue A, Negro F: A novel hepatitis C virus (HCV) subtype from Somalia and its classification into HCV clade 3. J Gen Virol 2000, 81: 1485-1493.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Pawlotsky JM, Tsakiris L, Roudot-Thoraval F, Pellet C, Stuyver L, Duval J, Dhumeaux D: Relationship between hepatitis C virus genotypes and sources of infection in patients with chronic hepatitis C. J Infect Dis 1995, 171: 1607-1610. 10.1093/infdis/171.6.1607View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Chamberlain RW, Adams N, Saeed AA, Simmonds P, Elliott RM: Complete nucleotide sequence of a type 4 hepatitis C virus variant, the predominant genotype in the Middle East. J Gen Virol 1997,78(Pt 6):1341-1347.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Trepo C: Genotype and viral load as prognostic indicators in the treatment of hepatitis C. Journal of Viral Hepatitis 2000, 7250-257.Google Scholar
  19. Yoshioka K, Kakumu S, Wakita T: Detection of hepatitis C virus by polymerase chain reaction and response to interferon-a therapy: relationship to genotypes of hepatitis C virus. Hepatology 1992, 16: 293-299. 10.1002/hep.1840160203View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Martinot-Peignoux M, Marcellin P, Pouteau M: Pretreatment serum hepatitic C virus RNA levels and hepatitis C virus genotype are the main and independent prognostic factors of sustained response to interferon alfa therapy in chronic hepatitis C. Hepatology 1995, 22: 1050-1056.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Bell H, Hellum K, Harthug S: Genotype, viral load and age as independent predictors of treatment outcome of interferon-α 2a treatment in patients with chronic hepatitis C. Scand J Infect Dis 1997, 29: 17-22. 10.3109/00365549709008658View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Franciscus A: HCV genotypes and Quasipcies. Hepatitis C support project.2006. []Google Scholar
  23. Von Wagner M, Huber M, Berg T: Peginterferon-alpha-2a (40KD) and ribavirin for 16 or 24 weeks in patients with genotype 2 or 3 chronic hepatitis C. Gastroenterology 2005, 129: 522-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Dalgard O, Bjoro K, Hellum KB: Treatment with pegylated interferon and ribavarin in HCV infection with genotype 2 or 3 for 14 weeks: a pilot study. Hepatology 2004, 40: 1260-5. 10.1002/hep.20467View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Hayashi J, Kawakami Y, Nabeshima A: Comparison of HCV RNA levels by branched DNA probe assay and by competitive polymerase chain reaction to predict effectiveness of interferon treatment for patients with chronic hepatitis C virus. Dig Dis Sci 1998, 43: 384-391. 10.1023/A:1018874910195View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Kakumu S, Aiyama T, Okumura A, Iwata K, Ishikawa T, Yoshioka K: Earlier loss of hepatitis C virus RNA in interferon therapy can predict a long-term response in chronic hepatitis C. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 1997, 12: 468-472. 10.1111/j.1440-1746.1997.tb00468.xView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Vrolijk JM, de Knegt RJ, Veldt BJ, Orlent H, Schalm SW: The treatment of hepatitis C: history, presence and future. Neth J Med 2004, 62: 76-82.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Ahmad W, Ijaz B, Javed TF, Jahan S, Shahid I, Khan FM, Hassan S: HCV genotype distribution and possible transmission risks in Lahore, Pakistan. World J Gastroenterol 2010, 16: 4321-4328. 10.3748/wjg.v16.i34.4321PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Ali A, Ahmed H, Idrees M: Molecular epidemiology of Hepatitis C virus genotypes in Khyber Pakhtoonkhaw of Pakistan. Virol J 2010, 203: 1-7.Google Scholar
  30. Inamullah Idrees M, Ahmed H, Ghafoor S, Ali M, Ali L, Ahmed A: Hepatitis C virus genotype circulating in district Swat of Khyber Pakhtoonkhaw , Pakistan. Virology Journal 2011, 8-16.Google Scholar
  31. Idrees M: Common genotypes of hepatitis C virus present in Pakistan. Pak J Med Res 2001, 40: 46-49.Google Scholar
  32. Idrees M: Development of an improved HCV Genotyping Assay for the Detection of Common Genotypes and subtypes in Pakistan. J Virol Meth 2008, 150: 50-56. 10.1016/j.jviromet.2008.03.001View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Ghulam M: Mansehra-an introduction, science-religion Dialogue. 2003, 20: 50-61.Google Scholar
  34. Elasifer AH, Agnnyia YM, Al-Alagi BA, Daw MA: Epidemiological manifestations of hepatitis C virus genotypes and its association with potential risk factors among Libyan patients. Virology Journal 2010, 7: 317. 10.1186/1743-422X-7-317PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Muhammad N, Jan MA: Frequency of hepatitis "C" in Buner, NWFP. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak 2005, 15: 11-14.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Rehman I, Idrees M, Ali M, Ali L, Butt S, Hussain A, Akbar H, Afzal S: Hepatitis C virus genotype 3a with phylogenetically distinct origin is circulating in Pakistan. Genetic Vaccines and Therapy 2011, 9: 2. 10.1186/1479-0556-9-2PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Sarwat A, Naeem M, Hussain A, Kakar N, Babar ME, Ahmad J: Prevalence of hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotypes in Balochistan. Mol Biol Rep 2008.Google Scholar
  38. Altuglu I, Soyler I, Ozacar T, Erensoy S: Distribution of hepatitis C virus genotypes in patients with chronic hepatitis C infection in Western Turkey. Int J Infect Dis 2008, 12: 239-244. 10.1016/j.ijid.2007.07.003View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Chowdhury A, Santra A, Chaudhuri S, Dhali GK, Chaudhuri S, Maity SG, Naik TN, Bhattacharya SK, Mazumder DN: Hepatitis C virus infection in the general population: a community-based study in West Bengal, India. Hepatology 2003, 37: 802-809. 10.1053/jhep.2003.50157View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Shinji T, Kyaw Y, Gokan K, Tanaka Y, Ochi K: Analysis of HCV genotypes from blood donors shows three new HCV types 6 subgroups exist in Myanmar. Acta Med Okayama 2004,58(3):135-42.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Tokita H, Okamoto H, Luengrojanakul P, Vareesangthip K, Chainuvati T, Iizuka H, Tsuda F, Miyakawa Y, Mayumi M: Hepatitis C virus variants from Thailand classifiable into five novel genotypes in the sixth (6b), seventh (7c, 7d) and ninth (9b, 9c) major genetic groups. J Gen Virol 1995, 76: 2329-2335. 10.1099/0022-1317-76-9-2329View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Zeuzem S, Lee JH, Franke A: Quantifcation of the initial decline of serum hepatitis C virus RNA and response to interferon alfa. Hepatology 1998, 27: 1149-1156. 10.1002/hep.510270433View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Pawlotsky JM: Mechanism of antiviral treatment efficacy and failure in chronic hepatitis C. Antiviral Res 2003, 59: 1-11. 10.1016/S0166-3542(03)00088-3View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar


© Ali et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.