Open Access

Prevalence of Korean cats with natural feline coronavirus infections

  • Dong-Jun An1,
  • Hye-Young Jeoung1,
  • WooSeog Jeong1,
  • Jee-Yong Park1,
  • Myoung-Heon Lee1 and
  • Bong-Kyun Park2Email author
Virology Journal20118:455

https://doi.org/10.1186/1743-422X-8-455

Received: 26 January 2011

Accepted: 28 September 2011

Published: 28 September 2011

Abstract

Background

Feline coronavirus is comprised of two pathogenic biotypes consisting of feline infectious peritonitis virus (FIPV) and feline enteric coronavirus (FECV), which are both divided into two serotypes. To examine the prevalence of Korean cats infected with feline coronavirus (FCoV) type I and II, fecal samples were obtained from 212 cats (107 pet and 105 feral) in 2009.

Results

Fourteen cats were FCoV-positive, including infections with type I FCoV (n = 8), type II FCoV (n = 4), and types I and II co-infection (n = 2). Low seroprevalences (13.7%, 29/212) of FCoV were identified in chronically ill cats (19.3%, 16/83) and healthy cats (10.1%, 13/129).

Conclusions

Although the prevalence of FCoV infection was not high in comparison to other countries, there was a higher prevalence of type I FCoV in Korean felines. The prevalence of FCoV antigen and antibody in Korean cats are expected to gradually increase due to the rising numbers of stray and companion cats.

Keywords

FCoV IFCoV IISeroprevalence

Background

Feline coronavirus (FCoV) is an enveloped, positive-sense, single-stranded RNA virus of the family Coronavirideae within the order Nidovirales. FCoVs are comprised of two pathogenic biotypes [1] consisting of feline infectious peritonitis virus (FIPV) and feline enteric coronavirus (FECV), which are both divided into two serotypes (Type I and II). The serotypes differ in their growth characteristics in cell culture and antigenicity, relative to canine coronaviruses (CCoVs) [2].

The prevalence of type I and II FCoV have been surveyed in many countries, including Japan [3], United States [4], United Kingdom [5], Austria [6], Switzerland [7], and Taiwan [8]. The majority of field isolates in these countries are of type I, regardless of the assay method [4].

FCoVs are associated with mild or subclinical enteric infections [9]. However, in a small proportion of cats, FCoV infection leads to the development of a lethal, immune-mediated condition known as feline infectious peritonitis (FIP) [10, 11]. FIP is a complex immune disease involving virus or viral antigen, antiviral antibodies, and complement. Cats that do not develop anti-FCoV antibodies do not develop FIP.

Serological surveys of FCoV infection have involved detection of antibody by indirect fluorescent antibody assay (IFA) or enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) [1215]. A plaque-reduction neutralization test (PRNT) was developed to serologically distinguish FCoV type I and II infections in cats [16].

In a previous study, the number of cats raised in Seoul, the capital city of South Korea, was reported to be around 30,000 in 2004 [17]. The most common breed in Korea is the Korean short hair cat, but this has been changing the recent years due to the increasing number of cats that are being raised as companion cats. Previously, there have been case reports of FIP in a Persian chinchilla (2 years age, female) and a Korean short hair cat (3 months age, male) [18], but no nationwide survey for FCoV has been carried out in Korea.

Therefore, the objectives of the current study were to identify the seroprevalence of FCoV and to classify the FCoV serotypes in Korean cats in comparison with prevalence in other countries.

Methods

Cat specimens

Feline serum and fecal swab samples were collected from 212 cats consisting of 107 samples from six local animal hospitals (four in Seoul and two in Kyunggi) and 105 samples from two animal shelters (Incheon and Daejeon) in 2009. Of the 212 samples, 129 were from clinically healthy cats and 83 were from cats displaying symptoms of illness that included inappetence, anorexia, weight loss, lethargy, icterus, fever, diarrhea, and thoracic effusion.

RNA extraction and reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)

Viral RNA was extracted from fecal samples using TRIzol LSb (Invitrogen, Valencia, CA) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Two RT-PCR methods were used: one enabled the highly sensitive detection in fecal samples and the other distinguished type I from type II. The former method was based on nested PCR using primers for the amplification of the highly conserved 3'-untranslated region (3'-UTR) of the FCoV genome [19]. The latter method [8], which was based on the spike gene region of the FCoV genome, is a multiplex-nested PCR using 2 μL of the first PCR product as the template and nested primers [5] for discrimination of Type I and II FCoVs. In addition, FCoV positive samples were further tested for feline panleukopenia virus (FPLV) using a specific FPLB primer set and conditions previously described [20] to identify possible relationships between the two viruses.

IFA detection of anti-FCoV antibody

Anti-FCoV antibody titers in feline serum samples were determined by IFA using porcine kidney-15 (PK-15) cells and porcine transmissible gastroenteritis virus (TGEV) [19]. In brief, PK-15 cells were inoculated with TGEV at a multiplicity of infection of 10 plaque forming units (PFU)/cell and incubated for 8 h at 37°C. PK-15 cells were trypsinized, mixed approximately half-and-half with uninfected cells, and seeded into wells of eight-well glass plates (Nutacon, Amsterdam, The Netherlands). Cells were incubated for 60 min at 37°C with serial two-fold dilutions of serum samples in phosphate buffered saline (PBS), washed three times for 5 minutes, and incubated for 1 hour with fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated goat anti-feline immunoglobulin G (KPL, Gaithersburg, MD).

Phylogenetic analysis

Korean FCoV sequences from this study and 30 sequences from global FCoV isolates obtained from GenBank were aligned using the Clustal X 1.83 sequence alignment program [21]. Nucleotide and amino acid sequence identities among the Korean FCoV isolates were calculated using BIOEDIT 7.053 [22]. The phylogenetic tree was created by a neighbor-joining method using MEGA 4.0 software [23].

Results

The total number of positive fecal samples for FCoV 14 cats, which were mostly Korean short hair breeds over one year of age. Of these FCoV positive cats, three were identified to be co-infected with FPLV (Table 1).
Table 1

Summary for 14 cats with Feline Coronavirus type I, and II, or co-infection.

Cat No

Breed

Gender

Age

(month)

Region

Collection Site

Collection Month

FCoVs type

Strain

Accession No

Antibody titer (IFA)

FPLV

420

Domestic short hair

M

12

Kyonggi

Hospital

April

I

08K-420

JN654401

80

-

478

Domestic short hair

M

9

Seoul

Hospital

April

I

08K-478

JN654402

640

-

559

Domestic short hair

M

30

Kyonggi

Hospital

April

I & II

08K-559/I

08K-559/II

JN654403

JN654411

160

-

609

Domestic short hair

F

14

Seoul

Hospital

May

II

08K-609

JN654412

20

-

656

Scottish Fold

F

12

Daejeon

Shelter

May

II

08K-656

JN654413

640

-

958

Domestic short hair

M

12

Incheon

Shelter

June

I

08K-958

JN654404

40

-

1011

Scottish Fold

M

42

Seoul

Hospital

June

I

08K-1011

JN654405

20

+

1154

Domestic short hair

F

11

Daejeon

Shelter

July

II

08K-1154

JN654414

80

-

1177

Perisan

M

14

Kyonggi

Hospital

July

I

08K-1177

JN654406

320

-

1429

Scottish Fold

F

15

Seoul

Hospital

Aug

I & II

08K-1429/I

08K-1429/II

JN654407

JN654415

80

-

1549

Domestic short hair

M

10

Incheon

Shelter

Sep

I

08K-1549

JN654408

640

-

1552

Domestic short hair

M

12

Seoul

Hospital

Sep

I

08K-1552

JN654409

20

+

1553

Domestic short hair

F

24

Seoul

Hospital

Sep

II

08K-1553

JN654416

160

-

1991

Domestic short hair

M

24

Incheon

Shelter

Dec

I

08K-1991

JN654410

80

+

Among the 212 feline fecal swab samples, eight were positive for FCoV type I, four were positive for type II, and two were positive for types I and II (Table 2). Eleven of the positive samples were from cats displaying symptoms of infection. Three of the positive samples were from asymptomatic cats (Table 2). Among the ill cats, the infections were due to type I (n = 6), type II (n = 3) and both types I and II (n = 2). Of the three positive samples from asymptomatic cats, two were type I and one was type II (Table 2). Of the 107 specimens collected from six local animal hospitals, the nine FCoV-infected cats included type I (n = 5), type II (n = 2), and types I and II (n = 2) (Table 1). The 105 fecal swab samples obtained from two animal shelters included five that were FCoV positive (three type I and two type II; co-infection was not evident).
Table 2

Prevalence of feline CoV in Korea by type and clinical status.

Clinical status

Number of case tests

  

Typable

 

Total

 

Type I

Type II

Type I and II

 

Ill

6/83 (7.2%)

3/83 (3.6%)

2/83 (3.6%)

11/83 (13.5%)

Healthy

2/129 (1.6%)

1/129 (0.8%)

0/129 (0%)

3/129 (2.3%)

Total

8/212 (3.8%)

4/212 (1.9%)

2/212 (0.9%)

14/212 (6.6%)

Alternatively, canine coronavirus (CCoV) or TGEV can be used as a target antigen because of their close serological identity with FCoV. The prevalence of anti-FCoV antibody in the feline samples was low (29/212; 13.7%) and comprised 20-fold (n = 5), 40-fold (n = 6), 80-fold (n = 5), 160-fold (n = 3), 320-fold (n = 2), 640-fold (n = 4), 1280-fold (n = 3), and 2560-fold (n = 1) (Figure 1). The 29 cats having FCoV antibodies included 16 of the 83 ill cats (19.3%) and 13 of the 129 healthy cats (10.1%), and, according the location of sample collection, represented animal hospital cats (14.0%, 15/107) and shelter cats (13.3%, 14/105).
Figure 1

Distribution of immunoflurorecent assay (IFA) titers to FCoV among cats. IFA titers are expressed as the reciprocal value of the highest dilution. On the left half are chronically ill cats and on the right half are healthy cats.

A phylogentic analysis was performed using spike gene partial sequences from 46 CoVs including Korean FCoV from the current study (n = 16), FCoVs obtained globally (n = 23), CCoVs (n = 5), raccoon dog CoV (RDCoV; n = 1), and Chinese fetter badger CoV (CFBCoV; n = 1). The phylogenetic tree data set was resampled 1000 times to generate bootstrap percentage values. The phylogenic tree clearly delineated types I and II FCoVs. The analysis showed that of the ten Korean FCoVs in the type I group, nine type I FCoVs belonged to a different lineage when compared to strains isolated from other parts of the world, and only the Korean FCoV 08K-1991 was grouped with UCD1 (Japan). All six Korean type II FCoVs (08K-609, 08K-656, 08K-1154, 08K-1553, 08K-559/II and 08K-1429/II) was shown to be originated from the same lineage as F20-54-II isolated from Japan (Figure 2).
Figure 2

Phylogenetic relationships between partial spike gene sequences of 46 coronaviruses. The samples were comprised of 16 FCoVs from Korea, 23 FCoVs from around the world, five CCoVs, one RDCoV, and one CFBCoV. All sequences except the 16 FCoV sequences derived from the current study (in boldface) were obtained from GenBank. An unrooted phylogenetic tree was constructed from aligned sequences by the neighbor-joining (NJ) method using MEGA 4.0 software. Bootstrap percentages are shown above those branches that are supported in at least 60% of the 1,000 replicates. Scale bar indicates nucleotide substitutions per site.

Discussion

The prevalence of type I and II FCoVs has been surveyed in many countries [38, 16]. Similar to these other countries, the majority of FCoV infections in Korea was shown to be of type I (66.7%), with type II constituting approximately 33.3%. The type I virus is more genetically diverse than type II, perhaps reflecting its global distribution and a long period of persistence of the virus in asymptomatic cats [5, 24].

Previous studies have reported the proportion of infected cats that are co-infected with type I and II viruses were as high as 15.8% (6/38) in Taiwan [8] and 6.8% (5/74) in Austria [6]. In the current study, there was no incidence of co-infection with type I and II FCoV in healthy cats, whereas the prevalence of co-infection in ill Korean cats was somewhat higher (14.3%, 2/14) than that reported in cats from Austria. Investigation of both of the co-infected Korean cats revealed that they dwelled in a house that also had a dog as a companion animal. This indicates that type II FCoV may have originated from a double recombination between type I FCoV and type II CCoV [25].

Previous research conducted in several countries has revealed that 69-91% of seropositive cats are suspected of having a type I infection [3, 4, 7]. In the present study, although the evaluation for seroprevalence by the virus neutralization test between types I and II FCoV could be not performed, FCoV seroprevalence was presently somewhat lower than the previously reported prevalences from other countries.

In a study conducted in Japan in the early 1990s, a low prevalence of FCoV antibodies was detected in chronically diseased cats (21.3%) and non-diseased cats (13.4%) by IFA [3]. A more recent study in that country that utilized PRNT reported a substantially greater (three times) seroprevalence [16]. The latter authors suggested that, despite the differing analysis regimens and samples, type II FCoV infection has been decreasing in Japanese domestic cats in recent years. Accordingly, we anticipate that the use of the PRNT array for Korean feline specimens would produce a higher seroprevalence than was evident using IFA.

Phylogenic analysis of the spike gene of FCoV types I and II clearly discriminated between the two types (Figure 2), in agreement with previous results [8]. The 16 Korean FCoVs in our study were classified into two serotypes, type I (n = 10) and II (n = 6) on the neighbor joining tree which was inferred using the Kimura 2 parameter model assuming uniform rates of change among sites. Geographical origin or sub-lineage classification of the FCoVs was not evident due to low nodal support value, but the perfect bootstrap percentage on the node (CCoV C8-45) indicates that our strains may have originated from this type II prototype.

In this study, we examined the prevalence of Korean cats infected with type I and II FCoV and identified the seroprevalence of FCoV in Korean cats. Type I and II FCoV are not highly prevalent in comparison to the prevalence of other countries. However, in recent years Korean feline population, has been rising and it's possible their occurrence may increase in the future.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to Ms Hyun-Jung Kim for technical assistance.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
National Veterinary Research and Quarantine Service
(2)
Department of Veterinary Medicine Virology Lab, College of Veterinary Medicine, Seoul National University

References

  1. Pedersen NC: An overview of feline enteric coronavirus and infectious peritonitis virus infections. Feline Pract 1987, 23: 7-22.Google Scholar
  2. Pedersen NC, Black JW, Boyle JF, Evermann JF, McKeirnan AJ, Ott RL: Pathogenic differences between various feline coronavirus isolates. Adv Exp Med Biol 1984, 173: 365-380.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Hohdatsu T, Okada S, Ishizuka Y, Yamada H, Koyama H: The prevalence of types I and II feline coronavirus infections in cats. J Vet Med Sci 1992, 54: 557-562. 10.1292/jvms.54.557View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Vennema H: Genetic drift and genetic shift during feline coronavirus evolution. Vet Microbiol 1999, 69: 139-141. 10.1016/S0378-1135(99)00102-9View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Addie DD, Schaap IA, Nicolson L, Jarrett O: Persistence and transmission of natural type I feline coronavirus infection. J Gen Virol 2003, 84: 2735-2744. 10.1099/vir.0.19129-0View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Benetka V, Kubber-Heiss A, Kolodziejek J, Nowotny N, Hofmann-Parisot M, Mostl K: Prevalence of feline coronavirus types I and II in cats with histopathologically verified feline infectious peritonitis. Vet Microbiol 2004, 99: 31-42. 10.1016/j.vetmic.2003.07.010View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Kummrow M, Meli ML, Haessig M, Goenczi E, Poland A, Pedersen NC, Hofmann-Lehmann R, Lutz H: Feline coronavirus serotypes 1 and 2: seroprevalence and association with disease in Switzerland. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol 2005, 12: 1209-1215.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Lin CN, Su BL, Wanga CH, Hsieh MW, Chueh TJ, Chueh LL: Genetic diversity and correlation with feline infectious peritonitis of feline coronavirus type I and II: A 5-year study in Taiwan. Vet Microbiol 2009, 136: 233-239. 10.1016/j.vetmic.2008.11.010View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Pedersen NC, Boyle JF, Floyd K, Fudge A, Barker J: An enteric coronavirus infection of cats and its relationship to feline infectious peritonitis. Am J Vet Res 1981, 42: 368-377.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Poland AM, Vennema H, Foley JE, Pedersen NC: Two related strains of feline infectious peritonitis virus isolated from immunocompromised cats infected with a feline enteric coronavirus. J Clin Microbiol 1996, 34: 3180-3184.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Vennema H, Poland A, Foley J, Pedersen NC: Feline infectious peritonitis viruses arise by mutation from endemic feline enteric coronaviruses. Virology 1998, 243: 150-157. 10.1006/viro.1998.9045View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Horzinek MC, Osterhaus ADME: Feline infectious peritonitis: a worldwide serosurvey. Am J Vet Res 1979, 40: 1487-1492.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Ishida T, Washizu T, Fukuoka J, Toriyabe K, Uchino T, Motoyoshi S: Feline infectious peritonitis virus antibody test using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. J Vet Med Sci 1987, 49: 145-149.Google Scholar
  14. Pedersen NC: Serologic studies of naturally occurring feline infectious peritonitis. Am J Vet Res 1976, 37: 1449-1453.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Scott FW: FIP antibody test--interpretation and recommendations. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1979, 175: 1164-1168.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Shiba N, Maeda K, Kato H, Mochizuki M, Iwata H: Differentiation of feline coronavirus type I and II infections by virus neutralization test. Vet Microbiol 2007, 124: 348-352. 10.1016/j.vetmic.2007.04.031View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Myung BY, Kim SE, Shim KM, Ryu JW, Kim SH, Moon C, Bae CS, Choi SH, Kang SS, Park H: Clinical characteristics of oral diseases on stray cats in Gwangju. Korean J Vet Res 2010, 50: 303-310.Google Scholar
  18. Kim TS, Lee SH, Lim SJ, Park HJ, Song ES, Jung DW, Kim DH, Song KH: Application of thromboxane synthetase inhibitor (Ozagrel HCL) in feline infectious peritonitis. Korean J Vet Res 2010, 50: 63-69.Google Scholar
  19. Herrewegh AA, de Groot RJ, Cepica A, Egberink HF, Horzinek MC, Rottier PJ: Detection of feline coronavirus RNA in feces, tissues, and body fluids of naturally infected cats by reverse transcriptase PCR. J Clin Microbiol 1995, 33: 684-689.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. An DJ, Jeong W, Jeoung HY, Yoon SH, Kim HJ, Park JY, Park BK: Phylogenetic analysis of feline panleukopenia virus (FPLV) strains in Korean cats. Res Vet Sci 2011, 90: 163-167. 10.1016/j.rvsc.2010.05.010View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Plewniak F, Jeanmougin F, Higgins DG: The CLUSTAL_X windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res 1997, 25: 4876-4882. 10.1093/nar/25.24.4876PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Hall TA: BIOEDIT: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symp Ser 1999, 41: 95-98.Google Scholar
  23. Tamura K, Dudley J, Nei M, Kumar S: MEGA4: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis (MEGA) software version 4.0. Mol Biol Evol 2007, 24: 1596-1599. 10.1093/molbev/msm092View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Herrewegh AA, Mähler M, Hedrich HJ, Haagmans BL, Egberink HF, Horzinek MC, Rottier PJ, de Groot RJ: Persistence and evolution of feline coronavirus in a closed cat-breeding colony. Virology 1997, 234: 349-363. 10.1006/viro.1997.8663View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Herrewegh AA, Smeenk I, Horzinek MC, Rottier PJ, de Groot RJ: Feline coronavirus type II strains 79-1683 and 79-1146 originate from a double recombination between feline coronavirus type I and canine coronavirus. J Virol 1998, 72: 4508-4514.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© An et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement