Open Access

Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders and Epstein-Barr virus DNAemia in a cohort of lung transplant recipients

  • Fausto Baldanti1Email author,
  • Vanina Rognoni1,
  • Alessandro Cascina2,
  • Tiberio Oggionni2,
  • Carmine Tinelli3 and
  • Federica Meloni2
Virology Journal20118:421

https://doi.org/10.1186/1743-422X-8-421

Received: 18 May 2011

Accepted: 5 September 2011

Published: 5 September 2011

Abstract

Background

Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders (PTLD) are serious complications in lung transplant recipients. No consensus on EBV DNAemia levels predictive of PTLD has been reached. In addition, in many instances EBV DNAemia is determined in patients with suggestive symptoms only.

Methods

The characteristics of five patients with PTLD as well as the prevalence of EBV DNAmia in a cohort of 137 consecutive patients receiving lung transplantation are described.

Results

Twenty-six out of 137 patients (18.9%) were excluded from the analysis because lost at follow-up or dead from PTLD-independent reasons within three months of transplantation. EBV DNA in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) was determined in 83/111 patients (74.8%) because of potential PTLD-related symptoms, while 28 patients (25.2%) showed no symptoms and were not examined. EBV DNAemia was positive in 53/83 patients (63.8%), and negative in 30/83 patients (36.2%). PTLD was diagnosed in five (4.5%) patients at a median time of 270 (range 120-870) days following transplantation. All five PTLD (three large B-cell lymphomas, one Hodgkin lymphoma and one possible pre-neoplastic lesion) were potentially associated with EBV infection. However, only 3/5 patients with PTLD had detectable EBV DNAemia: < 1,000 copies EBV DNA/1 × 105 PBMC in one patient and > 1,000 copies EBV DNA/1 × 105 PBMC in two patients.

Conclusion

A systematic multidisciplinary (clinical, radiologic, virologic and histologic) approach is mandatory for the diagnosis and management of PTLD in lung transplant recipients, while monitoring of symptomatic patients only may provide an incomplete or late picture of the clinical problem. In addition, staining for EBV antigens and quantification of EBV DNA in biopsy specimens should always be performed to understand the role of EBV infection in the pathogenesis of PTLD.

Keywords

EBV PTLD DNAemia lung transplant recipients

Background

Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders (PTLD) represent serious infectious complications in lung transplant recipients, who are at a greater risk than kidney, heart and liver transplant recipients [13]. However, the heterogeneous spectrum of clinical conditions included in PTLD definition (ranging from polymorphic lymphoproliferation to aggressive lymphomas) [3, 4], the wide time span from transplantation to emergence [2] and the debated pathogenetic role of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) [2, 46] make it difficult to perform cohort studies in transplant recipients [18]. In particular, the wide time interval to PTLD onset in different patient groups affects the feasibility of a tight monitoring of EBV DNA in blood, particularly in patients with late onset of PTLD, such as solid organ transplant recipients. Thus, systematic monitoring of EBV DNAemia in many transplant centers is often impossible as it depends on clinical manifestations suggestive of PTLD. For these reasons, the role of detection and quantification of EBV DNA in blood compartments (EBV DNAemia), used for monitoring patients at risk for PTLD [913] and guiding preemptive treatment [9, 1416] is still debated.

Here we describe the characteristics of five patients who developed PTLD and the prevalence of EBV DNAemia in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) in a cohort of 137 consecutive patients submitted to lung transplantation in a single transplantation center in Northern Italy from 2000-2007. Diagnosis and treatment of this elusive disease remains a clinical challenge.

Materials and methods

This retrospective study aimed at evaluating the prevalence and levels of EBV DNAemia in PBMC in a cohort of patients submitted to single-lung, double-lung or heart-lung transplantation in a single transplantation center in Northern Italy from 2000 to 2007.

From 2000 to 2003, EBV DNAemia was determined using a quantitative PCR technique [9], while from 2004 to 2007 a real-time PCR technique was adopted [17]. The two assays showed comparable sensitivity, being both able to reproducibly detect 10 EBV DNA copies in a background of 1 × 105 PBMC. In addition, the comparative analysis of a subset of PBMC samples as well as the results of an international quality control program QCMD http://www.qcmd.org showed agreement between the two PCR assays for quantification of EBV DNA levels (data not shown). Results were expressed as EBV DNA copy number/1 × 105 PBMC, and samples with no PCR signals were scored as containing < 10 EBV DNA copies/1 × 105 PBMC.

EBV DNAemia was prospectively determined when the patient exhibited symptoms or signs potentially associated with PTLD: fever of unknown origin, lymphoadenopathy, cytopenia, leukopenia, weight loss and asthenia. A presumptive diagnosis of PTLD was made based on virologic and radiologic findings and a definitive diagnosis was made by histologic or cytologic examination of tissue biopsies or needle aspirates.

Immune suppression therapy was reduced in patients showing EBV DNA values > 1,000 copies/1 × 105 PBMC [9]. Patients presenting with overt lymphomas were submitted to standard treatment protocols.

All the patients signed an informed consent at the time of transplantation. The study was approved by the Internal Review Board (protocol no. P-20080013903, Jun 3, 2008). Due to the retrospective nature of the study and the impossibility to obtain informed consent from patients deceased and lost at follow-up, the IRB allowed the analysis of anonymized stored samples and data (IRB protocol no. P-20020001513, Jan 18, 2010).

The Shapiro-Wilk's test was used to test the normal distribution of quantitative variables. If they were normally distributed, mean and standard deviation (SD) were used to summarize the results. Otherwise, median and Interquartile range (IQR; 25° - 75° percentile) were used. Specificity and sensitivity (with 95% Confidence Intervals) were used to compare positive and negative results. Differences between median EBV DNAemia levels at first detection and at peak of infection were evaluated with the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. The chi-squared statistics or Fisher's exact test, as appropriate, were applied to compare qualitative variables. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. All tests were two-sided. Data analysis was performed with the STATA statistical package (vers: 9; Stata Corporation, College Station, 2008, Texas, USA).

Results

Stored data of 137 patients receiving a single-lung (n = 58), double-lung (n = 74) or heart-lung (n = 5) transplantation from January 2000 to June 2007 were retrospectively analyzed. Data have been prospectively generated and archived as part of routine monitoring of infectious complications in solid organs transplant recipients. Ninety-nine patients (72.2%) were male, median age at transplantation was 52 years (range 13-71).

Twenty-six out of 137 patients (18.9%) were excluded from the analysis because lost at follow-up or dead from PTLD-independent reasons within 3 months after transplantation. The remaining 111 patients (81.1%) were considered representative of the entire cohort, since no differences in sex, age at transplantation, type of transplantation and distribution of underlying diseases were observed (p > 0.05 for all parameters).

Twenty-eight out of 111 patients (25.2%) never showed symptoms suggestive of PTLD and were not examined for EBV DNAemia, while 83 (74.8%) patients were examined at least once (median test no. 3; IQR 2 - 5) due to the presence of potential PTLD-related symptoms.

EBV DNAemia was positive in 53/83 patients (63.8%), while 30/83 patients (36.2%) were EBV DNA-negative. EBV DNAemia was first detected at a median time of 263 days from transplantation (IQR: 80 - 952). Among the 53 EBV DNA-positive patients, 10 (18.8%) showed EBV DNAemia levels > 1,000 copies/1 × 105 PBMC (median 2,430; range 1,208-1,311,180), while 43 patients showed lower values (median, 116; range 10-704).

Overall, PTLD was diagnosed in 5/111 (4.5%) patients at a median time of 270 days after transplantation (range 120-870) in the presence of different EBV DNA levels in PBMC: 2 patients scored as EBV DNAemia negative, 1 patient showed < 1,000 copies EBV DNA/1 × 105 PBMC and 2 patients showed > 1,000 copies EBV DNA/1 × 105 PBMC. Characteristics of the five patients with PTLD are summarized in Table 1.
Table 1

Characteristics of 5 lung transplant recipients patients with posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD).

Pt. #, age, sex

Underlying disease

Date of TX

Type of TX

Onset of PTLD

Immuno suppressive

treatment (dosage)

PTLD description

EBV DNA copies/105PBMC

1, 29, M

cystic fibrosis

Dec. 2000

double-lung

May 2003

Ciclosporin (350 mg/die)

Steroid (5 mg/die)

Laterocervical HL

1,760

2, 25, F

cystic fibrosis

Sep. 2001

double-lung

May 2002

Ciclosporin (150 mg/die)

Steroid (40 mg/die)

Mediastinic large B-cells NHL

< 10

3, 53, M

sarcoidosis

Dec. 2001

single-lung

Nov. 2002

Ciclosporin (250 mg/die)

Steroid (25 mg/die)

Mediastinic large B-cells NHL

< 10

4, 39, M

Istiocytosis X

Dec. 2004

double-lung

May 2005

Ciclosporin (550 mg/die)

Steroid (5 mg/die)

thoracic localization of EBV-positive B-cell lymphoma.

307

5, 63, M

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis

Aug. 2006

double-lung

Dec. 2006

Ciclosporin (300 mg/die)

Steroid (20 mg/die)

Mycophenolate mofetil (1000 mg/die)

Single nodule in lower left lobe, double mediastinic nodule (at histology, no tumor markers)

751,000 EBV DNA copies/μg tissue DNA, 8,500,000 copies/ml BAL

15, 289

TX: transplantation; PBMC: peripheral blood mononuclear cells; M: male; F: female; HL: Hodgkin lymphoma; NHL: non-Hodgkin lymphoma.

In more detail, Patient #1, developed primary EBV infection two months after transplantation and low-level EBV DNAemia persisted for one year (Figure 1). Twenty-five months after transplantation, EBV DNAemia peaked at 1,420 copies/105 PBMC in the absence of PTLD symptoms. Tapering of immune suppression was associated with reduction of EBV DNAemia in PBMC (Figure 1). Three and a half years post transplantation the patient presented with laterocervical Hodgkin lymphoma (mixed cell) in the presence of 1,760 copies EBV DNA/1 × 105 PBMC. Following multiple treatment courses with interferon and anti-CD20 MAb, remission of the lymphoma was achieved. In parallel, disappearance of EBV DNA in blood was observed (Figure 1). This patient died five years and eight months after transplantation of bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome.
Figure 1

Kinetics of EBV DNAemia in a lung transplant recipient developing primary EBV infection and PTLD in the post-transplant period. The dotted line indicates EBV DNAemia levels. The dark-grey boxes indicate treatment periods. The time of PTLD diagnosis is indicated by the arrow.

Patient #2 developed a broncho-mediastinic diffuse large B-cell lymphoma eight months after transplantation. EBV DNA in PBMC was negative. The disease was refractory to chemotherapy and the patient died eight months later.

Patient #3, developed a diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in the upper lobe of the transplanted lung associated with homolateral hilar-mediastinic lymphadenopathy 11 months after transplantation. EBV DNAemia was negative. No remission was achieved despite chemotherapy and the patient died three months later.

In patient #4, lung nodules suggestive of lymphoma were detected by computerized tomography (CT) four months after transplantation. Leukopenia (2,290 cells/μl) associated with marked lymphopenia (8%) was simultaneously recorded. EBV DNAemia was positive at a low level (183 copies/1 × 105 PBMC). One month later, fever and asthenia prompted a second CT scan analysis which revealed significant hilar bronchial and vascular infiltrate of the left lung. Bronchoscopy showed extrinsic occlusion of the major left bronchial lumen and concomitant infiltrate of the bronchial wall. Histology confirmed the presence of a diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Immunohistochemistry documented the presence of EBV antigens in more than 80% of neoplastic cells. EBV DNAemia was still low (395 copies/1 × 105 PBMC). Leukopenia (3,560 cells/μl) and lymphopenia (8%) still persisted. Remission of the B-cell lymphoma was not achieved following seven courses of chemotherapy. Two years after transplantation, 19 copies EBV DNA/1 × 105 PBMC were shown in the presence of normal leukocyte counts. The patient died three months later of a massive hemophtysis.

In patient #5 a routine CT scan analysis performed four months after transplantation showed a non-infiltrative nodular lesion lacking contrast enhancement in the left lower lobe. Positron emission tomography (PET) analysis did not show increased glucose uptake in the lesion, while two additional controlateral mediastinal nodules showed increased glucose uptake. Histologic examination of the lung lesion showed the presence of nonspecific inflammatory infiltrates. PCR showed high EBV DNA levels in PBMC (15,289 copies/1 × 105 PBMC), lung nodule aspirate (751,000 copies/μg tissue DNA) and bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) (8,500,000 copies/ml). Taken together these data were suggestive of a pre-neoplastic EBV-associated PTLD. The patient was submitted to significant tapering of the immune suppressive regimen. One month later, a reduction in the nodule size and EBV DNA level in PBMC (Figure 2) were observed. On the other hand, PET analysis showed the persistence of increased glucose uptake in mediastinic lesions. EBV DNA determination in a lymphnode biopsy showed 131,118,000 EBV DNA copies/0.5 ug tissue DNA (Figure 2). Two months later, EBV DNAemia levels were reduced by 4.9-fold (3,108 copies/1 × 105 PBMC) and EBV DNA levels in BAL by 3.8-fold (2,213,300 EBV DNA copies/ml BAL) (Figure 2). The size of the mediastinic nodules was reduced as well, and the intraparenchymal lesion disappeared (Figure 2). Nine months after transplantation, CT scan analysis showed the absence of lung and mediastinal nodules, while EBV DNAemia persisted at levels > 1,000 EBV DNA copies/1 × 105 PBMC (Figure 2). The patient is currently alive and well.
Figure 2

Kinetics of EBV DNAemia and computerized tomography scan analysis in a patient with PTLD. (A) Monitoring by computerized tomography scan analysis of an intrathoracic PTLD nodule (white arrow) in a lung transplant recipient. (B) EBV DNA levels in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC), bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) and biopsy specimens.

Tapering of immune suppression was associated with disappearance of EBV DNAemia in the other eight patients with EBV DNAemia levels > 1,000 copies in the absence of radiologic findings for PTLD.

Discussion

PTLD had a prevalence of 4.5% in patients with > 3 months follow-up. This data is in agreement with previous reports [3, 18]. Despite the low number of PTLD in our series, some conclusions can be drawn. Although all five confirmed PTLD (3 large B-cell lymphomas, 1 Hodgkin lymphoma and 1 possible pre-neoplastic lesion) were potentially associated with EBV infection [3], only 3 patients had detectable EBV DNAemia (patient #1, 4 and 5). Thus, the two patients with negative EBV DNAemia (patient #2 and 3) were either carrying a B-cell PTLD not driven by EBV [5] or the effect of EBV infection on lymphoproliferation had been localized at the intra-thoracic level [19]. Unfortunately, biopsies were not analyzed for EBV antigens or nucleic acids, and neither hypothesis can be dismissed. Among the three EBV DNAemia-positive patients with PTLD, two showed high and one low EBV DNAemia levels. However, EBV DNAemia could have been underestimated in the latter due to lymphopenia

In conclusion: i) a combined clinical, radiological, virological and histologic approach is mandatory for the diagnosis and management of PTLD, ii) staining for EBV antigens and quantification of EBV DNA in biopsy specimens should always be performed in parallel, iii) when critically evaluated in the clinical context, EBV DNAemia remains a useful parameter to follow-up patients at risk for PTLD, although the present data suggest that this disorder may occur also in the absence of detectable EBV DNAemia, iv) the role of other biologic factors remains to be elucidated.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We thank Laurene Kelly for revision of the English and Daniela Sartori for manuscript editing. This work has been supported in part by the Ministero della Salute, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo Ricerca Corrente grant no. 80207.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Laboratori Sperimentali di Ricerca, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo
(2)
Clinica di Malattie dell'Apparato Respiratorio, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo
(3)
Servizio di Epidemiologia Clinica e Biometria, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo

References

  1. Opelz G, Dohler B: Lymphomas after solid organ transplantation: a collaborative transplant study report. Am J Transplant 2004, 4: 222-230. 10.1046/j.1600-6143.2003.00325.xView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Ghobrial IM, Habermann TM, Macon WR, Ristow KM, Larson TS, Walker RC, Ansell SM, Gores GJ, Stegall MD, McGregor CG: Differences between early and late posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorders in solid organ transplant patients: are they two different diseases? Transplantation 2005, 79: 244-247. 10.1097/01.TP.0000144335.39913.5CView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Bakker NA, van Imhoff GW, Verschuuren EAM, van Son WJ: Presentation and early detection of post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder after solid organ transplantation. Transplant Int 2007, 20: 207-218. 10.1111/j.1432-2277.2006.00416.xView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Nalesnik MA: Clinicopathologic characteristics of post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders. Recent Results Cancer Res 2002, 159: 9-18. 10.1007/978-3-642-56352-2_2View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Leblond V, Davi F, Charlotte F, Dorent R, Bitker MO, Sutton L, Gandjbakhch I, Binet JL, Raphael M: Posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorders not associated with Epstein-Barr virus: a distinct entity? J Clin Oncol 1998, 16: 2052-2059.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Dotti G, Fiocchi R, Motta T, Mammana C, Gotti E, Riva S, Cornelli P, Gridelli B, Viero P, Oldani E, Ferrazzi P, Remuzzi G, Barbui T, Rambaldi A: Lymphomas occurring late after solid-organ transplantation: influence of treatment on the clinical outcome. Transplantation 2002, 74: 1095-1102. 10.1097/00007890-200210270-00007View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Lucioni M, Capello D, Riboni R, Ippoliti G, Campana C, Bandiera L, Arcaini L, Rossi D, Cerri M, Dionigi P, Lazzarino M, Magrini U, Viganò M, Gaidano G, Paulli M: B-cell posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorders in heart and/or lung recipients: clinical and molecular-histogenetic study of 17 cases from a single institution. Transplantation 2006, 82: 1013-1023.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Schubert S, Renner C, Hammer M, Abdul-Khaliq H, Lehmkuhl HB, Felix Berger F, Hetzer R, Reinke P: Relationship of immunosuppression to Epstein-Barr viral load and lymphoproliferative disease in pediatric heart transplant patients. J Heart Lung Transplant 2008, 27: 100-105. 10.1016/j.healun.2007.09.027View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Baldanti F, Grossi P, Furione M, Simoncini L, Sarasini A, Comoli P, Maccario R, Fiocchi R, Gerna G: High levels of Epstein-Barr virus DNA in blood of solid-organ transplant recipients and their value in predicting posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorders. J Clin Microbiol 2000, 38: 613-619.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Stevens SJ, Pronk I, Middeldorp JM: Toward standardization of Epstein-Barr virus DNA load monitoring: unfractionated whole blood as preferred clinical specimen. J Clin Microbiol 2001, 39: 1211-1216. 10.1128/JCM.39.4.1211-1216.2001PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Wagner HJ, Wessel M, Jabs W, Smets F, Fischer L, Offner G, Bucsky P: Patients at risk for development of posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder: plasma versus peripheral blood mononuclear cells as material for quantification of Epstein-Barr viral load by using real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction. Transplantation 2001, 72: 1012-1019. 10.1097/00007890-200109270-00006View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Fafi-Kremer S, Brengel-Pesce K, Barguès G, Bourgeat MJ, Genoulaz O, Seigneurin JM, Morand P: Assessment of automated DNA extraction coupled with realtime PCR for measuring Epstein-Barr virus load in whole blood, peripheral mononuclear cells and plasma. J Clin Virol 2004, 30: 157-164. 10.1016/j.jcv.2003.10.002View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Benden C, Aurora P, Burch M, Cubitt D, Lloyd C, Whitmore P, Neligan SL, Elliott MJ: Monitoring of Epstein-Barr viral load in pediatric heart and lung transplant recipients by real-time polymerase chain reaction. J Heart Lung Transplant 2005, 24: 2103-2108. 10.1016/j.healun.2005.06.014View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. McDiarmid SV, Jordan S, Kim GS, Toyoda M, Goss JA, Vargas JH, Martín MG, Bahar R, Maxfield AL, Ament ME, Busuttil RW: Prevention and preemptive therapy of postransplant lymphoproliferative disease in pediatric liver recipients. Transplantation 1998, 66: 1604-1611. 10.1097/00007890-199812270-00006View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Comoli P, Labirio M, Basso S, Baldanti F, Grossi P, Furione M, Viganò M, Fiocchi R, Rossi G, Ginevri F, Gridelli B, Moretta A, Montagna D, Locatelli F, Gerna G, Maccario R: Infusion of autologous Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-specific cytotoxic T cells for prevention of EBV-related lymphoproliferative disorder in solid organ transplant recipients with evidence of active virus replication. Blood 2002, 99: 2592-2598. 10.1182/blood.V99.7.2592View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Lee TC, Savoldo B, Rooney CM, Heslop HE, Gee AP, Caldwell Y, Barshes NR, Scott JD, Bristow LJ, O'Mahony CA, Goss JA: Quantitative EBV viral loads and immunosuppression alterations can decrease PTLD incidence in pediatric liver transplant recipients. Am J Transplant 2005, 5: 2222-2228. 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2005.01002.xView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Baldanti F, Gatti M, Furione M, Paolucci S, Tinelli C, Comoli P, Merli P, Locatelli F: Kinetics of Epstein-Barr virus DNA load in different blood compartments of pediatric recipients of T-cell-depleted HLA-haploidentical stem cell transplantation. J Clin Microbiol 2008, 46: 3672-3677. 10.1128/JCM.00913-08PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Raj R, Frost AE: Lung retransplantation after posttransplantantation lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD): a single-center experience and review of literature of PTLD in lung transplant recipients. J Heart Lung Transplant 2005, 24: 671-679. 10.1016/j.healun.2004.04.011View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Levenson BM, Ali SA, Timmons CF, Mittal N, Muthukumar A, Payne DA: Unusual case of Epstein-Barr virus DNA tissue positive: Blood negative in a patient with post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder. Pediatr Transplantation 2009, 13: 134-138. 10.1111/j.1399-3046.2008.00965.xView ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Baldanti et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement